

 
 
January 5, 2022
Federal Grants to States and Local Governments Under 
Continuing Resolutions
Introduction 
the principal purpose is to accomplish a purpose authorized 
Congress uses an annual appropriations process to fund the 
by Congress. Federal assistance programs are also 
routine activities of most federal agencies. This process 
commonly referred to as “federal grant programs.”  
anticipates the enactment of 12 regular appropriations bills 
There are four phases of a federal grant life cycle: pre-
before the beginning of the fiscal year. When this process is 
award, award, grant administration, and post-award (see 
delayed beyond the start of the fiscal year, one or more 
figure below). Interim funding measures that do not provide 
continuing appropriations acts (commonly known as 
“
a full year of funding for federal grant programs potentially 
continuing resolutions” or “CRs”) can be used to provide 
affect each phase. Generally, the impact of the interim 
funding until action on regular appropriations is completed. 
funding may be influenced by certain provisions contained 
Federal agencies operating under a CR may encounter 
within the CR that might provide specific direction to 
difficulties with the budgetary execution of their programs. 
federal grant administering agencies regarding program 
In particular, CRs can limit the ability of agencies to take 
funding. In the absence of provisions for specific grant 
actions that would obligate funds beyond the expiration of 
programs, general grant administration practices may be 
the CR. This can have an impact on the ability of federal 
delayed or otherwise affected when full-year funding is not 
agencies to review and process applications for federal 
provided. For example, federal agencies may delay 
grant programs, and on fiscal planning by state and local 
calculating formula allocations for formula-based programs, 
governments anticipating federal grant funding. 
or may postpone making decisions regarding which 
Grant Administration Issues Under CRs 
applications will be awarded funding in competitive grant 
Federal outlays for grants to states and local governments 
programs. The grant administration practices affected by 
have grown from $16.4 billion in 1940 to $734.9 billion in 
CRs may vary depending on the timing of the interim 
2020 in constant FY2012 dollars. There are currently 
funding measure, with respect to the delays both at the 
approximately 2,073 federal assistance programs authorized 
beginning of the fiscal year due to the initial CR and at later 
by Congress. Federal assistance refers to the transfer of 
phases of the grant life cycle for CRs (and any extensions) 
money, property, services, or other items of value for which 
that have longer duration.
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Federal Grants to States and Local Governments Under Continuing Resolutions 
Grant Pre-award Phase 
recipients with respect to whether additional funding will be 
provided under subsequent funding measures.  Such partial 
Federal grant program administration practices are typically 
grant awards may not be adequate for all grant recipients. 
structured to begin with the pre-award phase beginning at 
For example, if a recipient is provided only partial funding 
the onset of the federal fiscal year. During the pre-award 
for a construction project at the beginning of the fiscal year, 
phase of the federal grant life cycle, federal grant 
they may be hesitant to break ground and begin work 
administering agencies must evaluate the level of 
without knowing whether or when the full amount of 
appropriations provided for grant programs and apply 
federal funding will be available. Such uncertainty may be 
funding allocation methodologies. Continuing resolutions 
less problematic for service-oriented grants since partial 
create two significant challenges during this phase. 
funding might allow a grant recipient to continue providing 
First, CRs prohibit an agency from taking most actions that 
services with smaller grant awards until full funding can be 
would initiate new obligations or “new starts.” Grant 
provided. For partial grant awards to be made, however, 
awards for which the funding would be provided for the 
federal agencies may have to execute several grant 
first time are typically viewed as a “new start” since there is 
agreements for a single project rather than executing a 
no previous contractual relationship with the potential grant 
single grant agreement at the beginning of the fiscal year 
recipient. Such prohibition may also apply to multiyear 
for the entire grant award period, increasing administrative 
grant awards, when the current fiscal year appropriations 
costs for both the federal agency and the grantees. As a 
would fund the second or subsequent years of the grant 
result, agencies may simply delay making any grant awards 
award (most “multiyear” grant awards are structured as a 
until the full-year appropriation is available. 
series of single-year awards with separate grant agreements 
executed at the beginning of each fiscal year). As a result, 
Grant Program Administration Phase 
CRs can delay grant funding for both new grant awards and 
and Post-award Audit Phase 
existing federally funded grant projects. 
Once a federal grant has been awarded, grant recipients can 
begin the programs or services for which federal funding 
Second, CRs do not determine the level of funding that will 
was provided. Continuing resolutions may influence when 
be ultimately available for a given program for the entire 
grant awards are made and whether a single grant award or 
fiscal year, and this uncertainty delays the ability of the 
multiple grant awards are provided. This affects the 
federal grant administering agency to establish funding 
oversight of federal grant programs, because this may cause 
allocations. In turn, this delay creates uncertainty for state 
the grant program administration activities and the post-
and local governments with regard to availability of federal 
award audit activities to overlap. When this happens, a 
funding for grant awards and may create cascading effects 
federal agency may be unable to appropriately evaluate the 
on their budget processes. State governments are frequently 
risks of waste, fraud, and abuse for the program, and for a 
the primary grant recipient for federal grant awards, but the 
particular grant recipient, prior to making subsequent 
majority of those funds are passed through to the sub-state 
awards. 
level. This can be further complicated because the fiscal 
year for most states begins in July and so does not align 
Additionally, when CRs affect the normal timing of grant 
with that of the federal government. This potential impact 
awards, there is the potential for overlapping grant award 
applies to both new awards and to existing awards with 
periods for the same grant recipient. For example, each 
multiyear project timelines. 
grant award typically includes a 12-month period for 
approved activities that commences at the time the grant 
Grant Award Phase 
agreement is executed. If funding to a grant recipient for a 
During the award phase, federal grant administering 
fiscal year is delayed until the middle of that fiscal year 
agencies select grant recipients and develop and execute 
while funding for the next fiscal year becomes available 
grant agreements awarding funding. The extent to which 
without delay, the grant recipient could have overlapping 
CRs affect the award phase may depend upon the duration 
grant award periods. This would create a period of several 
of the award period of the grant program. If the level of 
months where the grant recipient has two active grant 
full-year funding is not determined until later in the fiscal 
awards under the same program at the same time. This 
year, the grant award is typically delayed. While federal 
could create oversight and accountability challenges as well 
agencies can announce the prospective availability of 
as program evaluation challenges for the federal 
funding (through a Notice of Funding Availability) and can 
administering agency. Typically, grant management 
accept applications, federal administering agencies 
practices and achievement of grant program goals are 
generally do not execute new grant agreements until the full 
assessed at the end of the grant’s performance period. In 
appropriation level for a grant program is known since the 
some cases, the federal agency might need to make the 
federal agency cannot obligate funding not yet appropriated 
second grant award prior to evaluating the grantee for 
by Congress. For grant programs that use formula 
appropriate compliance with the previous award. Awarding 
allocations, the amount of individual grant awards cannot 
funding without assessing the use of previous funding may 
be determined until the full funding level is known; thus 
increase the risk of waste, fraud, and abuse. 
grant agreements cannot be executed until the award 
amounts can be calculated.  
Natalie Keegan, Analyst in American Federalism and 
Emergency Management Policy   
Although some grant programs may be able to make partial 
grant awards under CRs if Congress has provided authority 
IF12011
for agencies to do so, uncertainty may remain for grant 
 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Federal Grants to States and Local Governments Under Continuing Resolutions 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF12011 · VERSION 1 · NEW