

 
 INSIGHTi 
 
Colombia: Challenges for U.S. Policymakers 
in 2021 
Updated September 22, 2021 
Colombia is a key U.S. ally in Latin America and a long-term security partner. Colombia’s prominence in 
illegal drug production prompted the United States and Colombia to forge close counter-drug ties. Plan 
Colombia, a U.S.-Colombian program that began in 2000, focused initially on counternarcotics and later 
on counterterrorism, laying the foundation for an enduring partnership.  
Hard-hit by waves of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections in 2020-2021, Colombia has 
faced multiple challenges, all while attempting to recover from a pandemic-driven 6.8% economic 
contraction in 2020. These challenges include (1) spikes in coca cultivation and cocaine production; (2) 
violence against human rights and other social activists; (3) mass anti-government protests in mid-2021 
that lasted nearly three months; and (4) instability spilling over from Venezuela, including the migration 
of some 2 million Venezuelans fleeing their homeland’s crises. 
For some Members of Congress, priority aspects of the U.S.-Colombia relationship are close 
collaboration on security and on countering illicit drugs destined mainly for the U.S. market. For others, 
human rights concerns predominate, including accountability for abuses committed during Colombia’s 
decades-long internal armed conflict and more recent human rights violations.  
Post-conflict Security, Human Rights, and Venezuelan Migrants 
Colombia’s 2016 peace accord with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) resulted in the 
demobilization of 13,000 insurgents and the FARC’s transformation from a leftist guerrilla army to a 
political party. Neither the government nor the rebels have upheld all their commitments under the 
agreement. Some guerrillas, known collectively as FARC dissidents, have recently rearmed. 
President Iván Duque, elected in 2018 from the conservative Democratic Center party, campaigned as a 
peace accord critic. Many Colombians have protested what they view as his government’s lackadaisical 
peace accord compliance. Others have blamed the former FARC, FARC dissidents, and now Colombia’s 
largest insurgent group, the National Liberation Army (ELN), for ongoing insecurity. 
The 2016 peace accord established a transitional justice court, known as the JEP (based on its Spanish 
acronym), to identify and punish crimes committed during the conflict. In February 2021, a JEP 
investigation concluded the Colombian Armed Forces (mainly the Army) had killed 6,400 Colombian 
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN11631 
CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
civilians who were falsely presented as enemies killed in combat. Human rights groups consider the so-
called false positive killings a grave abuse and view the Duque government’s criticism of the JEP and 
underfunding of its operations to be unacceptable. 
After the peace accord was ratified in late 2016 and the FARC demobilized in rural zones, the government 
struggled to replace insurgent control with a comprehensive state presence to curb criminal competition 
and armed group expansion to fill the power void. Murders of social, ethnic, and labor leaders and of land 
rights and environmental activists often occurred in remote, ungoverned parts of the country. Colombian 
groups and international bodies such as the U.N. have criticized the Duque administration’s efforts to 
protect social leaders. 
In spring 2021, a proposed tax increase sparked widespread protests for several weeks, even after the 
Duque administration modified and then withdrew the tax increase. Public grievances mushroomed to 
include slow implementation of the peace accords, police brutality against demonstrators, economic 
inequality, crime, and corruption. Although many protested peacefully, blockades and vandalism by some 
demonstrators resulted in an estimated $3 billion of damage to the economy. Domestic and international 
monitoring groups condemned riot police and law enforcement clashes with protesters, which resulted in 
58 deaths and thousands of injuries. In June, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 
denounced Colombian law enforcement’s excessive use of force. In September 2021, the Duque 
administration successfully passed through Congress a significantly revised tax reform, which generated 
little public opposition. 
Colombia has received more than 2 million refugees and migrants from neighboring Venezuela. In 
February 2021, the Duque administration unveiled an innovative program offering Venezuelans who 
entered before January 2021 a decade of temporary protected status. By September 2021, nearly 1.3 
million Venezuelans had registered for access to health care, work permits, other social services, and a 
path to citizenship. President Duque said his government has a moral duty to legalize migrants escaping a 
dictatorship. However, Venezuelans, previously welcomed in Colombia, have become the focus of rising 
xenophobia, due in part to hardships imposed by the pandemic. 
U.S. Policy and Congressional Response 
Since 2000, the U.S. government has provided about $12 billion in bilateral aid to help implement Plan 
Colombia and its successor strategies. At times, congressional views have diverged regarding whether 
U.S. assistance should be weighted toward counternarcotics and security or toward development, peace, 
and human rights. The Trump Administration’s focus was largely on containing Venezuela and reducing 
drug flows. The Biden Administration’s regional aims of strengthening democratic institutions to build 
the rule of law and protect human rights likely will drive bilateral relations. Despite occasional areas of 
tension, the Biden Administration has signaled it will maintain close relations with Colombia.  
Many Members of Congress have praised Colombia’s leadership in promoting a democratic transition in 
Venezuela and its humanitarian response toward migrants fleeing the country. Nevertheless, given the 
significant amount of U.S. support to Colombia’s police over many years, some Members have 
questioned continued funding until police actions against demonstrators are fully investigated.  
Congressional oversight of U.S. assistance has continued to consider the efficacy of Colombia’s antidrug 
efforts. A long-standing but continuing debate is whether to support traditional supply control measures, 
such as the Duque administration’s restart of widespread aerial eradication of coca, or alternative 
approaches, such as prioritizing voluntary eradication and alternative development, as favored in the 
peace accord.  
In FY2021, Congress appropriated more than $463.3 million in bilateral aid for Colombia. The Biden 
Administration’s FY2022 budget request includes $460.2 million in bilateral aid for Colombia. The
  
Congressional Research Service 
3 
House-passed foreign aid appropriations bill for FY2022, H.R. 4373, would provide $461.4 million and 
stipulates that 30% of funding under the International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement (INCLE) 
and Foreign Military Financing accounts would be obligated only after the U.S. Secretary of State 
certifies that Colombia met certain human rights conditions; for the first time, counternarcotics aid under 
INCLE would be subject to certain conditions. 
 
Author Information 
 
June S. Beittel 
   
Analyst in Latin American Affairs 
 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
IN11631 · VERSION 4 · UPDATED