
 
 
February 23, 2021
Special Financial Assistance to Multiemployer Plans
Section 9704 of the Butch Lewis Emergency Pension Plan 
percentage of active to inactive participants in the plan was 
Relief Act of 2021, included as Subtitle H of the House 
less than 40%; or (4) became insolvent after December 14, 
Ways and Means Committee budget reconciliation 
2014, and was not terminated by the date of enactment. 
recommendations, would provide financial assistance to 
certain financially troubled multiemployer defined benefit 
Under the bill, PBGC would be authorized to issue 
(DB) pension plans. 
regulations specifying that for two years following 
enactment only plans meeting certain conditions would be 
Multiemployer pension plans are sponsored by more than 
able to apply for special financial assistance. The plans 
one employer and are maintained as part of a collective 
would be those likely to become insolvent within five years 
bargaining agreement. In DB plans, participants receive 
of enactment, those for which PBGC would be obligated to 
regular monthly benefit payments in retirement. 
provide more than $1 billion in financial assistance in the 
Multiemployer DB plans annually certify the plan’s 
absence of any special financial assistance, those that have 
financial status—known as the plan’s zone status. A plan 
reduced benefits under MPRA, or those meeting other 
can be in endangered, seriously endangered, critical, or 
conditions as determined by PBGC. 
critical and declining status (or no category if none of these 
apply). Plans in critical status are in poor financial 
Amount of Special Finance Assistance 
condition, and plans in critical and declining status are 
The amount of special financial assistance would be the 
expected to become insolvent within 20 years . About 10% 
amount needed to pay participants’ full plan benefits 
to 15% of multiemployer DB plan participants are in 
through the 2051 plan year. To determine the present value 
critical and declining status plans. 
of benefits, the plan would use the interest rate used in its 
most recent zone certification before January 1, 2021, 
When a multiemployer DB plan becomes insolvent, the 
subject to a maximum  limit.  The limit would be the interest 
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) provides 
rate used by single-employer DB pension plans to discount 
financial assistance to the plan (in the form of loans that are 
their benefits to be paid 20 years or more in the future 
not expected to be repaid) to pay participants’ benefits up to 
(referred to as the third segment rate in Title 26, Section 
a statutory maximum. PBGC  says that its multiemployer 
430(h)(2)(C)(iii),  of the U.S. Code) prior to adjustment for 
insurance program will likely become insolvent in 2026. 
the smoothing corridor in the month (or preceding three 
The federal government has no obligation to provide 
months) of the application, increased by two percentage 
assistance to PBGC. In the absence of legislative action to 
points. In January 2021, the third segment rate was 3.65%, 
address the insolvency of multiemployer plans or the 
so the limit would have been 3.65% + 2.0% = 5.65%. In 
PBGC,  participants in insolvent plans may face large 
2017 (the most recent year for which the data is available), 
benefit reductions, likely receiving less than $2,000 per 
the median interest rate multiemployer plans used to value 
year. 
benefit obligations was 7.0%. Using different interest rates 
would result in differing amounts of financial assistance.  
Special Financial Assistance 
Section 9704 would establish a fund within the PBGC and 
The special financial assistance would be paid to the plan as 
appropriate amounts as necessary to provide special 
a lump sum, would be kept separate from other plan assets, 
financial assistance to certain multiemployer DB plans. The 
and could be invested only in investment grade bonds or 
special financial assistance would not have to be repaid. 
other securities as determined by PBGC.  
Eligibility for Special Financial Assistance 
Participants’ benefits are not subject to the PBGC 
A plan could apply for special financial assistance through 
maximum  guarantee. 
December 31, 2025. A plan would be eligible if it meets at 
least one of the following conditions: the plan (1) was in 
Conditions on Receiving Special Financial 
critical and declining status in any plan year from 2020 
Assistance 
through 2022; (2) had an application to suspend benefits 
Section 9704 would impose a number of conditions on 
under the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 
plans that receive special financial assistance regarding, 
(MPRA, enacted as part of P.L. 113-235)  approved prior to 
among other things, participants’ benefits, withdrawal 
the enactment of the Butch Lewis Emergency Pension Plan 
liability, and PBGC premiums. 
Relief Act of 2021; (3) was in critical status in any year 
from 2020  through 2022 and had a modified funded 
A plan that had previously received approval for benefit 
percentage of less than 40% (calculated as the current value 
suspensions under MPRA would be required to (1) reinstate 
of plan assets divided by the present value of plan 
the benefits and (2) provide payments for benefits that 
liabilities, using a specified interest rate), and the 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Special  Financial  Assistance to Multiemployer  Plans  
participants and beneficiaries had not received because of 
benefits to PBGC maximum  guarantee levels. These plans 
the benefit suspensions. 
would be ineligible for special financial assistance.  
Plans would remain in critical status through 2051. 
Amount and Timing of Financial Assistance 
The interest rate is an important component for determining 
For 15 years following the receipt of special financial 
the amount of financial assistance. Because the bill’s 
assistance, an employer’s withdrawal liability would not 
specified interest rate limit is lower than the median interest 
take into account the special financial assistance. 
rate in 2017 used by plans when calculating the value of 
Withdrawal liability is an employer’s share of unfunded 
benefits for plan funding purposes, the value of benefits for 
benefits that is paid to the plan when the employer leaves a 
financial assistance purposes would be larger than the 
multiemployer DB plan. 
actuarial value of these benefits. 
PBGC  could impose reasonable conditions on plans 
The special financial assistance would be a lump sum 
receiving special financial assistance relating to increases in 
payment for the amount of the plan’s benefit obligations 
future accrual rates, retroactive benefit improvements, 
through 2051. However, there could be other ways to 
allocation of plan assets, reductions in employer 
provide the funds, such as annually for the amount of each 
contribution rates, diversion of contributions to, and 
year’s benefit payments. 
allocation of, expenses to other benefit plans, and 
withdrawal liability. PBGC  could not impose conditions 
Effect on Plan Financial Position and Employer 
relating to prospective reductions in plan benefits, changes 
Contributions 
to plan governance, or funding rules relating to receiving 
It is unclear how the special financial assistance would 
special financial assistance. 
affect plans’ reported financial positions and employer 
contributions. The bill would allow PBGC  to impose 
Plans that receive special financial assistance would 
reasonable conditions on employer contributions and 
continue to pay PBGC premiums, be deemed to be in 
participants’ benefit levels for plans receiving special 
critical status through the plan year ending in 2051, be 
financial assistance. Because plans would remain in critical 
ineligible to apply for MPRA benefit suspensions, and 
status through 2051, they would remain subject to the 
provide a disclosure that includes an estimate of each 
conditions in their rehabilitation plans. 
employer’s share of the plan’s unfunded vested benefits 
(determined after taking into account the special financial 
Greater Benefit to Certain Employers 
assistance). The disclosure would also include a statement 
Certain employers (e.g., United Parcel Service and Kroger) 
that the plan would have sufficient resources to pay benefits 
have promised to top up the benefits of some retired former 
through the 2051 plan year. 
employees in certain plans if they were reduced as a result 
of PBGC assistance or MPRA. Because this bill would not 
Increase in PBGC Premiums 
reduce participants’ benefits, these employers could benefit 
PBGC  premiums for all multiemployer plans would 
financially by not having to make the top-up payments. 
increase to $52 per participant beginning in 2031 and would 
be adjusted for inflation thereafter. In 2021, multiemployer 
No Structural Changes to Plans 
premiums are $31 and are adjusted for inflation annually.  
The bill would not impose any changes to the structure of 
multiemployer DB plans or plan funding rules to ensure 
Policy Considerations 
that currently financially healthy plans do not need financial 
Some proponents view federal financial assistance to 
assistance in the future. 
multiemployer plans as fulfilling part of a promise made to 
workers. Opponents argue that it is inappropriate to provide 
For Further Information 
federal financial assistance to private sector pension plans. 
CBO Score of Ways and Means Reconciliation 
Simulations by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) 
Recommendations, https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/2021-
indicated that, under this provision, an average of 185 plans 
02/hwaysandmeansreconciliation.pdf 
would receive $86 billion in special financial assistance and 
PBGC’s multiemployer program would remain solvent 
CRS Report R43305, Multiemployer Defined Benefit (DB) 
through the mid-2040s. CBO estimated administrative costs 
Pension Plans: A Primer 
at $0.1 billion. Because the special financial assistance 
would allow plans to delay or prevent insolvency, CBO 
CRS Report R45311, Policy Options for Multiemployer 
estimated that PBGC would spend $2 billion less in 
Defined Benefit Pension Plans 
financial assistance to these plans. Retirees would pay $1.7 
billion in federal income taxes on benefits that would not be 
CRS Report R46366, Single-Employer Defined Benefit 
received in the absence of the special financial assistance. 
Pension Plans: Funding Relief and Modifications to 
Funding Rules 
Participants’ Benefits 
Participants in multiemployer plans that receive special 
JCX-4-21,  Description of the Budget Reconciliation 
financial assistance would not see a reduction in benefits to 
Legislative Recommendations Relating to Pensions, 
the PBGC maximum  benefit level. Plans that became 
https://www.jct.gov/publications/2021/jcx-4-21/ 
insolvent prior to December 14, 2014, reduced participants’ 
John J. Topoleski, Specialist in Income Security 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Special  Financial  Assistance to Multiemployer  Plans 
 
IF11765
Elizabeth A. Myers, Analyst in Income Security  
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permissio n of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11765  · VERSION  1 · NEW