INSIGHTi
COVID-19 and Direct Payments: Frequently
Asked Questions (FAQs) About the Proposed
Third Round of “Stimulus Checks” in House
Reconciliation Legislation
February 17, 2021
Congress is considering a third round of direct payments to address the continued economic fal out from
the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A first round was included in the CARES Act (P.L.
116-136). A second round was included in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (P.L. 116-260). This
Insight provides a brief overview of the proposed third round of payments—often referred to as “stimulus
checks”—that were included in economic security legislation submitted in response to the reconciliation
directives included in the budget resolution (S.Con.Res. 5). A comparison of major provisions of the first,
second, and proposed third round of payments can be found here.
How much are the proposed payments?
Households would general y be issued a single payment based on the household’s income and size.
Specifical y, the payment would equal $1,400 per eligible individual ($2,800 for most married couples)
plus an additional $1,400 for each dependent as defined for tax purposes. The definition of dependent
would include older children and adult dependents. Households who reported income under $75,000 if
single, $112,500 if single with dependents, or $150,000 for most married couples would general y be
eligible for the maximum amount of the payment. In most cases, for the purposes of these payments, a
household would be al the individuals listed on an income tax return.
How would the payments phase out?
The maximum payment amount would phase out over a range of income: $75,000-$100,000 if single,
$112,500-$150,000 if single with dependents, or $150,000-$200,000 for most married couples. The
payment would be phased down proportional y (or “ratably”) in relation to income in the phaseout range.
For example, if a married couple with two children had $175,000 of income, which is the midpoint of the
phaseout range (50%), the payment would be reduced by 50%, and thus equal $2,800. If the same family
instead had income of $187,500 (75% of the phaseout range), the payment would be reduced by 75%, and
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN11604
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress
Congressional Research Service
2
thus equal $1,400. The larger the payment, al else being equal, the faster the payment would phase down
by income, as il ustrated below by the steeper phaseout segments of the graph.
Who would be eligible for the payments?
Most individuals—except nonresident aliens and individuals who can be claimed as dependents by
another taxpayer—would be eligible to receive these payments. In contrast to the first and second rounds
of payments, al dependents would be included when calculating the maximum payment amount for the
household. Dependents general y include both children (including dependent children in college) and
older adults.
Individuals who died before January 1, 2021, would not be eligible for payments. For married couples in
which one spouse died before January 1, 2021, the maximum payment amount would be halved (i.e.,
$1,400).
Could households that include individuals who do not have Social
Security numbers (SSNs) receive the payments?
Yes, as long as either an eligible individual or their dependent had a Social Security number (SSN).
General y, only eligible individuals and dependents who have SSNs are included in the calculation of the
proposed payment amount. For example, married couples in which only one spouse had an SSN (e.g., the
other had an individual taxpayer identification number, or ITIN) would be eligible to receive up to $1,400
(instead of $2,800). Similarly, if both spouses had ITINs but their dependent had an SSN, the household
would receive $1,400 for the dependent. ITINs are issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to
taxpayers who are not eligible for an SSN so that they can comply with federal tax law. ITIN users
Congressional Research Service
3
include many noncitizens who are unlawfully present or unauthorized to work in the United States. SSNs,
for the purposes of this provision, include any issued by the Social Security Administration, including
those associated with claiming a public benefit.
These taxpayer ID requirements would be relaxed for married joint filers in which at least one spouse is a
member of the Armed Forces. In those cases, if one spouse had an SSN, the married couple could receive
up to $2,800.
How would the payments be automatically issued?
Similar to the first and second rounds of direct payments, the third round of payments would be structured
as a new one-time refundable tax credit against 2021 income taxes. Households would not need to wait
until they filed their 2021 income tax return in early 2022 to receive the payment. Instead, the payments
would be automatical y issued (i.e., the credit would be “advanced”) to eligible households, general y
based on information from 2020 or 2019 income tax returns (i.e., income, number of eligible individuals
and dependents, and taxpayer IDs). If a payment issued in 2021 based on 2019 tax data would have been
larger based on 2020 tax data, the IRS would be directed to issue a supplementary top-up payment within
90 days of the 2020 tax filing deadline or September 1, 2021, whichever is earlier.
For eligible individuals who did not file a 2020 or 2019 income tax return (including those who, as a
result of their low incomes, are not required to file a tax return), the IRS would be given broad authority
to make payments based on information available to the Treasury.
General y, these payments would be automatical y issued to eligible households until December 31, 2021.
Eligible households who did not receive the payment (or who received less than they would have if the
payment amount were based on their 2021 income and family size) would be able to receive the payment
(or receive an additional payment) as a refundable credit on their 2021 tax return. In contrast, if a
household received more than they were eligible for, the difference would not need to be paid back.
Would the payments be taxable and would they affect eligibility for
other programs?
No, the payments would not be taxable. In addition, like other tax credits, the payments would not count
as income or resources for a 12-month period in determining eligibility for, or the amount of assistance
provided by, any federal y funded public benefit program.
Could the payments be reduced for child support or other debts?
The advanced payment of the credit would general y be exempt from offset by Treasury for certain past-
due debts the recipient owes (including past-due child support). In other words, the payment issued in
2021 would not be reduced for these debts. However, any amount of the payment that the taxpayer did not
receive in 2021 (i.e., was not received as an advanced payment) and instead claimed as a credit on their
2021 tax returns would be subject to offset.
Congressional Research Service
4
Author Information
Margot L. Crandall-Hollick
Acting Section Research Manager
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
IN11604 · VERSION 1 · NEW