INSIGHTi
Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing: President
Biden’s “Pause”
February 11, 2021
On January 27, 2020, President Biden issued Executive Order (E.O.) 14008, directing multiple
administrative actions to address climate change. Section 208 of the order directed the Secretary of the
Interior to “pause new oil and natural gas leases on public lands or in offshore waters pending completion
of a comprehensive review and reconsideration of Federal oil and gas permitting and leasing practices....”
The E.O. stated that this review must evaluate “potential climate and other impacts” associated with oil
and gas leasing, as wel as whether to adjust royalties paid to the federal government from onshore and
offshore oil and gas production to account for “climate costs.” The required “pause” and review must be
“consistent with applicable law.”
This CRS product briefly examines potential effects of the E.O. on federal offshore oil and gas leasing
activities on the U.S. outer continental shelf. The E.O. could have both short-term and longer-term effects
on these activities, depending partly on the duration of the leasing pause and on any changes to the
offshore oil and gas leasing program as a result of the required review. The agencies responsible for
leasing in federal waters—the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
(BOEM) and Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE)—thus far have altered some
activities based on the E.O. and kept others as before. The climate change effects of the pause and of any
resulting changes to offshore oil and gas activities are beyond the scope of this CRS product.
Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Sales
BOEM schedules offshore oil and gas lease sales through five-year leasing programs. The current
program includes three sales scheduled for 2021—two in the Gulf of Mexico and one in Alaska’s Cook
Inlet—along with one sale in the Gulf of Mexico in the first half of 2022. On February 4, 2021, BOEM
announced it was canceling public meetings and a public comment period related to the Cook Inlet lease
sale as a result of the E.O. As of the date of this CRS product, BOEM had not made a public
announcement regarding the first Gulf of Mexico lease sale of 2021, scheduled for March.
How the review ultimately may affect any paused lease sales is unknown. For example, the review might
or might not lead to changes in lease terms such as rental and royalty rates for these sales going forward,
or the sales could be canceled. BOEM has discretion to regulate lease terms under the Outer Continental
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN11601
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

---

Congressional Research Service
2
Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) and other authorities. Also, under the OCSLA and the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), scheduled sales may be canceled during implementation of a five-year program,
based on environmental reviews associated with individual sales. Such cancel ations sometimes occurred
under previous leasing programs.
New Five-Year Leasing Program
BOEM’s current five-year offshore oil and gas leasing program ends in June 2022. Typical y, preparation
of a new program takes two to three years. During the Trump Administration, BOEM released a draft of a
new five-year program and sought public comment. The Biden Administration could continue to work
from this draft program or could begin a new process.
It is unclear how the E.O. might affect BOEM’s work on the next five-year program. Although the E.O.
cal s for a “pause” on new oil and gas leases, BOEM is required by the OCSLA to prepare a five-year
program. One possibility is that BOEM could undertake some aspects of the E.O.’s required review in the
context of the economic and environmental assessments conducted for the five-year program. For
example, previous five-year programs considered potential climate and other impacts associated with
offshore oil and gas leasing, as is required in the E.O. Some other requirements of the E.O., such as an
evaluation of royalty rates, typical y have been pursued outside the development of five-year programs.
Offshore Drilling Permits
DOI stated in a fact sheet that the E.O.’s “targeted pause does not impact existing operations or permits
for valid, existing leases, which are continuing to be reviewed and approved.” According to a database
maintained by BSEE, more than 30 permits to dril on existing leases have been issued since the E.O.’s
publication on January 27, 2021. (Another BSEE database shows approval of multiple exploration and
development plans for existing leases during that time.) Separately, DOI Secretarial Order 3395, issued on
January 20, 2021, temporarily requires that any fossil-fuel authorizations (such as permits to dril ) be
approved only by specified DOI officials. The secretarial order has a duration of 60 days.
Federal Revenue Implications
Offshore oil and gas revenues provide most or al of the funding for several federal conservation and
restoration programs, including the Land and Water Conservation Fund, the Historic Preservation Fund,
and the newly established National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund. Also, under the
OCSLA and the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006, a portion of offshore oil and gas revenue is
shared with coastal states, with most of the funds going to Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas.
Offshore oil and gas revenues fluctuate from year to year based on multiple factors and totaled $3.7
bil ion in FY2020. More than 90% of this total came from royalties, with the remainder from bonus bids
at lease sales and rents paid prior to production. The E.O.’s leasing pause likely would impact some of
these revenue types earlier than others. For example, if BOEM held no auctions in 2021, no offshore
bonus bids would be collected this year. However, the effect on royalties—which form the high majority
of the offshore revenues shared with states and used for federal programs—would take longer to emerge,
because new offshore oil and gas leases typical y take several years to reach a point where production
would begin and royalties would be generated.

---

Congressional Research Service
3
Author Information

Laura B. Comay

Specialist in Natural Resources Policy




Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

IN11601 · VERSION 1 · NEW

---