
 
 
Updated January 12, 2021
The Federal Communications Commission in the Incoming 
Biden Administration: Issues and New Directions
Introduction 
For additional information about Section 230, see CRS 
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the 
Legal Sidebar LSB10484, UPDATE: Section 230 and the 
incoming Biden Administration may take different 
Executive Order on Preventing Online Censorship.  
positions on several key topics than the FCC under the 
Net Neutrality  
Trump Administration, including Section 230 of the 
Net neutrality, the policy that required internet service 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended (Section 230), 
providers to offer equal and nondiscriminatory access to 
net neutrality, and 5G. The recent confirmation of President 
Donald Trump’s
online content, was adopted by the FCC under then-
 nominee to join the FCC, Nathan 
President Obama in 2015 and repealed by the FCC under 
Simington, and Chairman Ajit Pai’s resignation on 
President Trump in 2017. The issue may again be an active 
Inauguration Day will leave the agency with a 2-2 split 
issue for the FCC under the incoming Biden 
between Democratic and Republican commissioners. The 
Administration, specifically, repealing the 2017 Restoring 
FCC typically has five members, with two commissioners 
Internet Freedom Order that reversed the 2015 order.  
and a chairperson from the President’s party. Democrats are 
due to effectively take control of the Senate majority and 
President-elect Biden’s net neutrality policy statement, 
would typically be handling an FCC nominee of the 
issued prior to the Democratic National Convention, states 
incoming President’s party. Current commissioner Jessica 
that his administration would “take strong enforcement 
Rosenworcel has been mentioned as a strong contender for 
action against broadband providers who violate net 
agency chairperson.  
neutrality principles through blocking, throttling, paid 
Topics for Likely FCC Action 
prioritization, or other measures that create artificial 
scarcity and raise consumer prices.” The current 
Although there are numerous issues that the new FCC may 
Democratic commissioners support this position. What 
consider, some issues that are currently under consideration 
action the FCC takes may depend on who is confirmed by 
can be expected to remain active, either to reverse current 
the Senate to fill the final seat on the Commission. 
FCC initiatives or to build on existing work. 
Section 230  
Opening the door for a reinstatement of the 2015 rules is a 
2019 ruling by the D.C. Circuit Court that stated it would 
Section 230 broadly protects operators of “interactive 
computer services” 
defer in this case to agency expertise regarding the 
and their users from liability for 
interpretation of the Communications Act of 1934 (see CRS 
publishing, removing, or restricting access to another 
person’s 
Report R44954, Chevron Deference: A Primer). This would 
content. Criticism of Section 230 has come from 
appear to provide a path for the FCC to reinterpret the law. 
both Democrats and Republicans over content moderation 
If so, it could pass a declaratory ruling to reverse the 2017 
decisions; both parties introduced legislation to amend 
RIFO and reinstate the 2015 Order to reclassify broadband 
Section 230 in the 116th Congress.  
providers from Title I to Title II services. Title I 
On May 28, 2020, President Trump issued an “Executive 
information services are subject to fewer regulations than 
Order on Preventing Online Censorship.” The order 
Title II common carrier telecommunications services. 
required the Secretary of Commerce to ask the FCC to 
Some experts have cited the heightened dependency on the 
initiate a rulemaking to clarify the provisions of Section 
internet during the pandemic as a driver for the FCC to 
230. On August 3, 2020, FCC Chairman Pai announced that 
move beyond a simple reinstatement to also include a 
the agency would be asking for public comment on the 
prohibition on data caps, interconnection fees, and special 
petition for rulemaking. The public comment period on this 
rates through a new net neutrality rulemaking. Any action 
proceeding closed on September 17, 2020, and on October 
by the FCC could be expected to draw legal challenges.  
15, 2020, Chairman Pai announced that the FCC would 
move forward with the rulemaking proceeding. However, 
Congress could preempt any FCC action by permanently 
Chairman Pai did not include the item on the January 15, 
classifying broadband as a Title II service or impose net 
2021, commission meeting agenda, so no final FCC order 
neutrality requirements under Section 706 of the 1996 
will be promulgated prior to President-elect Biden’s 
Telecommunications Act. It could also undertake a larger 
inauguration. President-elect Biden has expressed interest 
update to the act.  
in seeing changes to Section 230 to curb misinformation, 
but has stated he would prefer doing so through legislation 
For additional information about net neutrality, see CRS 
rather than the FCC. 
Report R40616, The Net Neutrality Debate: Access to 
Broadband Networks. 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
The Federal Communications Commission in the Incoming Biden Administration: Issues and New Directions 
5G  
develop the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF), which 
5G service deployment enjoys bipartisan support and is 
allocates $20.4 billion to subsidize broadband infrastructure 
likely to continue to be advanced through the FCC under 
in underserved rural areas. 
the incoming Biden Administration. Planned increases in 
The FCC under the incoming Biden Administration may 
the availability of spectrum for 5G services through 
work to broaden the recipients of broadband assistance to 
spectrum auctions and reallocations are expected to 
urban and suburban areas. Commissioner Geoffrey Starks 
continue, along with expanded support for wireless 
has stated that over 18 million households lack broadband 
broadband (e.g., 4G and 5G) coverage throughout the 
simply because it’s too expensive. The FCC under the 
country. Given recent disputes over spectrum reallocation, 
incoming Biden Administration may focus additional 
some observers believe that the FCC under the incoming 
attention on issues of affordability affecting the digital 
Biden Administration may focus more attention on policies 
divide. 
aimed at resolving interagency differences and interference 
concerns over spectrum use. The FCC under the incoming 
The FCC under the incoming Biden Administration may 
Biden Administration will likely continue an emphasis on 
look to update some other programs that assist the 
5G network security and protection against cyberattacks, as 
disadvantaged, such as the E-Rate program that provides 
well as maintaining a strong posture towards China and 
broadband access to schools and libraries at a discount, and 
domestically may examine the impact of policies 
the Lifeline program that provides telecommunications 
streamlining infrastructure deployment, and the potential 
services to certain low-income populations. 
adverse environmental and health impacts of 5G. 
For additional information about the digital divide, 
The incoming Biden Administration, including the FCC, is 
broadband deployment, and the Universal Service Fund, 
expected to implement policies to restrict and remove 
including the E-Rate, Lifeline, and RDOF, see CRS Report 
Huawei and ZTE equipment from U.S. telecommunications 
R46613, The Digital Divide: What Is It, Where Is It, and 
networks. This policy would limit the use of U.S. grants 
Federal Assistance Programs; CRS Report R46501, Rural 
funds for such equipment, and promote open-sourced, open 
Digital Opportunity Fund: Requirements and Selected 
architecture approaches for 5G networks to counter the 
Policy Issues; and CRS In Focus IF11520, The Universal 
dominance of Chinese firms in the global 
Service Fund and COVID-19: The FCC and Industry 
telecommunications market. It is expected to continue 
Response. 
working with the interagency “Team Telecom” and the 
Other Topics 
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States 
(CFIUS) on the security of the U.S. telecommunications 
Additional topics, for which President-elect Biden has not 
sector, and continue streamlining the application and 
yet provided specific plans, may also be addressed by the 
evaluation of foreign investment and participation in it. 
FCC under the incoming Administration. 
Team Telecom evaluates foreign investment or 
Broadband Privacy 
participation in U.S. telecommunications companies, while 
In early 2017, Congress and the Trump Administration used 
CFIUS may review foreign investment in and acquisition of 
the Congressional Review Act to overturn strict privacy 
U.S. companies in any industry, including 
rules for broadband internet access providers promulgated 
telecommunications. Additionally, the FCC may remain 
by the FCC under then-President Obama. Without 
focused on advancing 5G technologies through its 5G Fund 
congressional action, the FCC is prohibited from adopting 
for Rural America. 
any new rules on the issue.  
For additional information about 5G, see CRS Report 
Agency Transparency and Process Reform  
R45485, Fifth-Generation (5G) Telecommunications 
Chairman Pai implemented process reforms intended to 
Technologies: Issues for Congress. 
increase transparency of agency actions. For example, one 
Digital Divide 
reform resulted in more votes being taken on rulemakings 
As part of his rural economic development strategy, 
rather than being decided at the bureau or office level. 
President-elect Biden has proposed an investment of $20 
These reforms are widely expected to continue at the FCC 
billion to deploy broadband access to communities where it 
under the incoming Biden Administration. 
is currently unavailable. He has also called for partnering 
Media Mergers, Acquisitions, and Ownership 
with municipal utilities to deploy broadband to rural 
How the FCC under the incoming Biden Administration 
America. His development strategy states 
may scrutinize media mergers, acquisitions, and ownership 
High-speed  broadband  is  essential  in  the  21st 
has been a topic of debate. While some observers believe it 
may engage in closer examination of public interest issues 
century economy. At a time when so many jobs and 
than under the Trump Administration, others have stated 
businesses  could  be  located  anywhere,  high-speed 
that the change of administration is unlikely, on its own, to 
internet  access  should  be  a  great  economic 
affect such activity.  
equalizer for rural America, not another economic 
disadvantage. 
Enforcement 
The FCC under incoming President Biden may provide its 
The incoming Biden Administration may build on the 
Enforcement Bureau with the operational autonomy it had 
Trump Administration’s work in this area. Addressing the 
during the Obama era. During the Trump administration, 
digital divide is an issue that both parties have recognized 
the FCC required a vote by the full Commission to approve 
as an important goal. For example, during the Trump 
penalties such as forfeitures.
Administration, the White House worked with the FCC to 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
The Federal Communications Commission in the Incoming Biden Administration: Issues and New Directions 
 
IF11720
Patricia Moloney Figliola, Specialist in Internet and 
Telecommunications Policy   
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11720 · VERSION 3 · UPDATED