

 
 INSIGHTi 
 
Supply Chain Considerations for COVID-19 
Vaccine Manufacturing 
November 23, 2020 
The development of a vaccine for the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been of 
concern to Congress, as vaccination can be one of the most effective methods of preventing disease 
spread. On November 18, 2020, Pfizer/BioNTech announced that an interim analysis found its newly 
developed vaccine to be “95% effective against COVID-19” and has since filed for an Emergency Use 
Authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. On November 16, 2020, Moderna 
announced that its vaccine, tentatively evaluated as 94.5% effective, will also be submitted for an EUA. 
According to media reports, “Moderna said it would have 20 million doses ready by the end of 2020; 
Pfizer said it would have about 50 million by then.” Providing COVID-19 vaccines—complex, specially 
manufactured and distributed products—involves significant supply chain considerations. Needed 
supplies may be limited in quantity and face global competition.  This Insight provides an overview of 
selected supplies required to manufacture vaccines and ancillary vaccination materials that may pose 
supply chain challenges and describes the federal government’s role in this process. It does not cover 
particular contracts issued, or supplies potentially required for transportation, distribution, and 
administration of eventual vaccines. 
Federal Role in COVID-19 Vaccine Manufacturing  
Through Operation Warp Speed (OWS), a public-private partnership engaged in deploying 
countermeasures against COVID-19, the federal government has entered into contractual agreements with 
medical supply and pharmaceutical companies to procure necessary supplies for countermeasure 
manufacturing. OWS has also invested in manufacturers’ production capabilities, partly by financing new 
factory  construction. While investigational vaccines are still undergoing late-stage clinical trials, 
production of vaccination supplies has begun. Any shortages may hamper vaccine distribution efforts and 
delay the vaccination campaign timeline. Materials of concern include those used to contain the vaccine, 
inject it into the body, increase the body’s immune response, and ensure vaccine safety. Vaccine 
manufacturers stated in a congressional hearing, “we believe we have a path to be able to have all the 
necessary materials for a vaccine program, should we be successful.” Yet, throughout the pandemic, 
transparent, up-to-date reporting on the medical supply chain to federal agencies has, in general, been an 
issue, particularly for drug ingredients or supplies required for manufacturing.  
Congressional Research Service 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
IN11544 
CRS INSIGHT 
Prepared for Members and  
 Committees of Congress 
 
  
 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
Medical-Grade Glass Vials 
Medical-grade glass vials store vaccine doses during transport and are tempered to protect the vaccine 
from temperature fluctuations. They are also specifically engineered not to interact with the vaccine itself, 
thus protecting the formula from degradation or inactivation. Given that multiple doses of vaccine per 
person may be required to ensure immunity, hundreds of millions of vials may be required to meet global 
demand. The federal government has entered into contracts to procure or produce medical-grade glass 
vials, but potential shortages of vials may delay the vaccination campaign. The federal government has 
also entered into contracts for glass vial alternatives, such as plastic vials or prefilled syringes. Plastic 
vials have a thin glass coating on the inside of the vial to protect vaccine purity in transport. Prefilled 
syringes are filled with vaccine and transported to administration sites where they can be used.  
Needles and Syringes 
Needles and syringes are used to physically inject the vaccine into the body, where the formula can then 
elicit an immune response to confer disease immunity to the recipient. As these are single-use supplies, 
used needles cannot be repurposed and must be appropriately disposed of.  Just as with glass vials, OWS 
has entered into public-private contracts with domestic suppliers for needle and syringe production. 
Vaccine Potency and Adjuvant 
Adjuvant is a vaccine ingredient that interacts with immune mechanisms to increase the speed and 
magnitude of the body’s response to an antigen (a substance that initiates an immune response and the 
production of antibodies). The use of adjuvant reduces the amount of antigen required per dose of 
vaccine, allowing the same amount of antigen to go toward creating more doses. There are many different 
formulations of adjuvants, each optimized for a particular class of vaccine. The MF59 adjuvant used for 
influenza vaccine, for example, contains the oil squalene, which is sourced best from shark livers. While 
there are alternative sources of squalene, production capabilities of these alternatives may not be 
sufficient to meet demand. Plant sources, for example, yield far less squalene than shark liver, and 
synthetic versions have yet to be evaluated for safety and efficacy. Squalene’s sourcing from scarce 
animal products may raise environmental concerns as well, given the scale of vaccine production required 
to meet global demands. Neither Pfizer/BioNTech nor Moderna are using this type of adjuvant in their 
vaccines, but other COVID-19 vaccines supported by OWS plan to use squalene adjuvants; potential 
supply shortages may thus affect vaccination timelines. 
Vaccine Quality Control Testing 
Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate (LAL), an enzyme found in the blood of horseshoe crabs, is used to evaluate 
vaccine safety by detecting whether a sample has bacterial contamination. Similar to concerns about 
squalene harvesting from sharks, ramping up LAL harvest from animal sources raises potential 
environmental implications. While there is one approved synthetic variety of LAL, production capabilities 
may need to be evaluated. 
Considerations for Congress 
A lack of needed supplies may hinder efforts to manufacture and distribute vaccines, as some cannot be 
manufactured without ingredients like LAL, and vaccines, in general, cannot be distributed without items 
such as needles and syringes. It may be important, therefore, to ensure continuity of supplies by 
addressing potential shortages early. Congress may benefit from regular, publicly available updates on 
whether supply companies are meeting their production deadlines. This includes deadlines for contracts 
currently in place and for factory improvements to increase production capacity.  Congress may also
  
Congressional Research Service 
3 
consider whether additional contracts may be required to fully meet demand for these supplies. Lastly, 
Congress may consider evaluating whether there is adequate monitoring of supply chain integrity, as any 
interruptions in manufacturing may hamper the vaccination campaign. These efforts may help ensure 
timely rollout of the vaccine(s) following licensure or authorization by the Food and Drug Administration. 
 
Author Information 
 
Simi V. Siddalingaiah 
   
Analyst in Health Economics 
 
 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff 
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of 
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of 
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. 
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United 
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, 
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the 
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
IN11544 · VERSION 1 · NEW