
 
November 12, 2020
China’s 14th Five-Year Plan: A First Look
The Communist Party of China (CPC)’s 19th Central 
including national economic, industrial, and technology 
Committee—a body of China’s 376 top Party officials—
development goals and economic competitiveness—and 
held its 5th Plenum in late October 2020 to deliberate on 
“properly handling the relationship between openness and 
China’s 14th Five-Year Plan (FYP) for 2021-2025 and 
independence.” Chinese leaders seek to secure China’s 
economic goals out to 2035. China’s annual Central 
supply chains and boost self-sufficiency in agriculture, 
Economic Work Conference is to review the plans in 
energy, technology, and industry. In a speech to the Party’s 
December before they are unveiled at the annual session of 
Central Economic and Financial Working Group in April 
China’s legislature in March 2021. Initial details suggest 
2020, President Xi called for building “independent, 
that Chinese leaders plan to expand the state’s role in the 
controllable, secure, and reliable supply chains to ensure 
economy and advance national economic security interests; 
industrial and national security with access to at least one 
use market restrictions and its One Belt, One Road global 
alternative source for important products.” President Xi said 
networks to foster Chinese-controlled supply chains; and 
China should “use existing global dependencies on China as 
sharpen the use of antitrust, intellectual property (IP), and 
a counterweight to pressures to shift manufacturing out of 
standards tools to advance industrial policies. To develop 
China” and “use the pull of China’s market to attract global 
capabilities prioritized in its plans, China is repositioning to 
resources and deepen global dependence on China.” Xi also 
obtain foreign technology through partnerships in open 
called for developing and leveraging control of “core 
technology and basic research, and to establish research and 
technologies”—in sectors such as high speed rail, 
development (R&D) centers overseas, and talent programs 
telecommunications and power equipment, and new 
for foreign experts to work in China. Plans for new market 
energy—and localizing technology and critical production 
openings are limited to zones and focus on areas where 
in China, including through import substitution. One Belt, 
China seeks foreign expertise (emerging technologies and 
One Road is often cited as a network to facilitate secure 
education) and capital (financial services). 
trade and gain initial global footholds in MIC2025 sectors. 
To counter offshoring pressures, Hainan Province is 
Dual Circulation and Secure Supply Chains 
reviving incentives for manufacturing that processes 
China faces widening and deepening trade tensions, foreign 
imported inputs for re-export (e.g., duty free import of raw 
pressures on businesses to move some production out of 
materials, components, and equipment) and air and 
China, foreign government restrictions on technology 
shipping logistics. China is also looking to other priorities:  
transfer to China, global scrutiny of Chinese overseas 
commercial activity, and international skepticism about 
Agriculture: The government is drafting a food security 
China’s commitment to market opening and global trade 
plan, has made provincial governors responsible for grain 
rules. Chinese President Xi Jinping is reviving a “dual 
security measures, increasing domestic capabilities, and 
circulation” economic policy that his predecessor used 
diversifying sources for agricultural imports. China plans to 
during the 2009 financial crisis and the “supply side” 
introduce new strains with higher yields (a potential nod to 
reforms that Xi used in 2015 to upgrade industry and launch 
biotech now that China owns Syngenta), and boost 
Made in China 2025 (MIC 2025) industrial policies. Dual 
production of high quality grains and soy. Diversification is 
circulation refers to leveraging the dual forces of domestic 
affecting China’s shortfalls in meeting purchase targets set 
and global demand by developing domestic capacity while 
by the January 2020 U.S.-China trade agreement.  
pursuing openings in global markets. The policy aims to 
boost both domestic supply and demand in response to what 
Technology: China is focused on developing the digital 
Chinese leaders describe as a complex, unstable, and 
economy and cryptocurrency and digital trade rules that it 
uncertain global environment. The approach is not a simple 
aims to push globally. China’s stimulus committed $1.4 
turn inward, but rather seeks to transfer and localize foreign 
trillion over five years for digital infrastructure, including 
capabilities in China and maintain access to global markets 
5G, smart cities, and Internet of Things applications for 
wherever possible—including for key inputs, technology, 
manufacturing. U.S. business has expressed concerns that 
and exports—to develop China’s capabilities. Dual 
(i) these sectors are already restricted, and (ii) procurement 
circulation appears to have intensified China’s non-
in areas such as cloud computing could favor Chinese firms 
reciprocal approach to trade whereby its market has become 
and require technology disclosure and data localization.  
increasingly restrictive while Chinese firms expand 
overseas. In 2009, when global industry contracted, China 
Finance: China is developing a central bank digital 
subsidized production in 13 sectors, funding domestic 
currency to try to influence global finance and ecommerce, 
purchases of these products and exporting excess capacity, 
and to diversify from U.S. dollar financing. The Chinese 
a precursor to China’s One Belt, One Road initiative.  
city Shenzhen and Hainan Province are to pilot cross-border 
cryptocurrency trade and cash pooling of foreign exchange 
Details to date about national, regional, and industry plans 
and China’s currency, the renminbi. The zones are also 
emphasize ensuring China’s national economic security—
promoting financial services investment; the securitization 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
China’s 14th Five-Year Plan: A First Look 
and trading of data, energy, IP, and real estate assets; and 
cross-border financing for Chinese technology firms.  
In September 2020, the CPC Central Committee called for 
strengthening Party control of the private sector to “build a 
Environmental Technologies: China’s pledge to peak CO
backbone of private economic actors that are reliable and 
2 
emissions by 2030 relies on MIC 2025 goals in power, and 
useful at critical moments.” President Xi has called state firms 
new energy technologies and materials, such as batteries. 
an important pil ar for the Party to govern and rejuvenate 
Plans call for half of vehicles to be electric or fuel-cell 
China, saying they must be stronger, better, and bigger. State 
powered, and the other half hybrid by 2035. China’s 
funding continues to underpin priority sectors. The funding is 
environmental and technology goals are mutually 
challenging to track through a complex web of onshore and 
reinforcing; 14th FYP environmental policies could bolster 
offshore corporate and financial vehicles, including 
China’s efforts to upgrade manufacturing and require 
government guidance funds; local government, insurance, and 
foreign technology transfer to meet new standards. 
asset management companies; venture capital and private 
equity; corporate bonds; and stock listings. 
 “Indigenous” Innovation and Basic Research 
Chinese leaders arguably are emphasizing technology 
Standards, Antitrust and IP Tools 
independence and indigenous innovation—long-standing 
China is midstream in advancing priorities set in the 2006 
themes in China’s industrial policies—while prioritizing 
MLP and the 13th FYP. New plans will likely continue to 
China’s ability to continue to access foreign technology and 
advance sectors and projects prioritized in these plans and 
global markets. The 5th Plenum Communique reinforces 
MIC 2025—including aerospace, artificial intelligence, 
innovation as the core driver of China’s development, a 
biotechnology, information technology, semiconductors, 
direction set in 2006 with China’s Medium and Long Term 
quantum computing, robotics, advanced machinery and rail, 
Plan for Science and Technology (MLP) and the 13th FYP. 
deep sea technologies, and new materials. China will likely 
These plans called for developing indigenous capabilities, 
introduce new projects and areas of emphasis, as well as 
decreasing dependence on foreign technology, and 
policies to advance its next stage of development in these 
advancing emerging technologies. This process of 
areas, including commercialization, standardization, 
“indigenous” innovation involves the introduction, 
financing, and export promotion. New plans emphasize 
absorption, and adaptation of foreign technology that is 
standards development, and antitrust and IPR enforcement 
rebranded as indigenous Chinese capabilities. The Party’s 
to advance industrial policies. These tools were used during 
emphasis on developing domestic innovation capabilities 
China’s 12th and 13th FYPs to require foreign technology 
has underpinned aspects of China’s industrial policies of 
and IP licensing, joint ventures, and divestitures to Chinese 
concern to the U.S. Congress, such as forced technology 
state firms. In 2018, China consolidated market 
transfer, industrial subsidies, state-financed acquisitions of 
competition, IP, and standards authorities in a powerful new 
foreign firms in strategic sectors, cyber intrusions, and other 
regulator—the State Administration for Market Regulation 
forms of IP theft. 
(SAMR)—that is poised to play a key role in implementing 
the 14th FYP. Since then, China’s Academy of Engineering 
The Chinese city Shenzhen is piloting 14th FYP innovation 
and SAMR have been developing China Standards 2035, a 
priorities that include a focus on foreign partnerships and 
plan to set standards in ways that advance Chinese 
overseas centers for basic research. China’s talent plan 
industrial goals and create interoperable civilian and 
incentives include visas and permits to facilitate frequent 
military standards, raising questions about the dual use 
cross-border travel, work, and permanent residence of 
nature of Chinese overseas infrastructure. China’s standards 
foreign experts in China. Reforms seek to commercialize 
setting may focus on new technologies where China may 
research, transfer government patent rights to innovators, 
have greater influence in the absence of existing rules. 
and revitalize national labs. China is looking to securitize IP 
Issues for Congress 
and develop digital IP rights to foster the trade of 
In response to China’s plans to further lean on state-led 
intellectual property. China is targeting foreign 
development, Congress might:  
collaboration in basic research, open technology, and 
overseas research centers to try to skirt export controls and 
  address China’s complex structuring of government industrial 
leverage areas that remain open for U.S. cooperation. These 
subsidies that make it difficult to determine the state’s role and 
ties are allowing China to develop capabilities in priority 
subsidization under global rules;  
areas, such as semiconductor design. Many countries’ 
  respond to China’s unconventional use of antitrust, IP, and 
export controls focus on applied research and technology 
standards tools, including potentially sharpening U.S. 
transfer across national borders. China’s new 
authorities and strengthening the U.S. role in global technical 
semiconductor policies encourage foreign academic and 
bodies to counter China’s policies;  
industry collaboration and Chinese corporate R&D centers 
  constrain China’s access to U.S. open source technology and 
overseas. In June 2020, Chinese firms Huawei and San’an 
basic research and tighten export control gaps; and 
Optoelectronics announced a $1.2 billion R&D center in the 
  use trade policy to facilitate supply chain security and trade 
United Kingdom to develop semiconductor chips. Many top 
and technology collaboration among allies and partners. 
Chinese technology firms—including Alibaba, Baidu, and 
 
Tencent—have U.S. R&D centers. 
Karen M. Sutter, Specialist in Asian Trade and Finance   
State Control and Financing 
Michael D. Sutherland, Analyst in International Trade and 
Finance   
IF11684
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
China’s 14th Five-Year Plan: A First Look 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11684 · VERSION 1 · NEW