INSIGHTi

Resurgence of Chemical Weapons Use:
Issues for Congress
Updated September 4, 2020
With increasing numbers of incidents, the use of chemical weapons (CW) has become a growing
international concern two decades after the international community decided to ban them under the 1997
Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). Syrian government forces have used the nerve agent sarin and
chlorine bombs dozens of times since 2013 in that country’s civil war. The Islamic State used mustard gas
in northern Iraq in 2015 and 2016. North Korean agents used the nerve agent VX to assassinate Kim Jong
Nam, the half-brother of the North Korean leader, at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport in February
2017. Russian agents used the Soviet-developed “Novichok”-class nerve agent in an attempted
assassination of a former Russian spy Sergei Skripal in the United Kingdom in March 2018. Russian
opposition figure Alexei Navalny was also poisoned with a Novichok nerve agent in August 2020.
Prior to the Syrian civil war, there had been no major use of chemical weapons since the 1995 terror
attack by the Aum Shinrikyo in Tokyo and by Iraq in the 1980s during its war with Iran. Some argue that
recent use and lack of accountability for such incidents undermine the international norm against
chemical weapons.
The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), originally established to oversee the
destruction of chemical weapons stocks under the CWC and promote the safe and peaceful use of
chemicals, now has additional challenges and responsibilities. Article X of the CWC provides the OPCW
authority to investigate and assist with reported incidents of CW use.
After the use of nerve agent on its territory, the UK called for a Special Session of the OPCW Executive
Council in June 2018 to highlight the gravity of chemical weapons use and to call for giving investigators
the mandate to attribute an attack when possible. CWC member states approved a decision that granted
the OPCW the added authority to attribute chemical attacks under investigation. In addition, the CWC
states in November 2019 adopted two decisions that amended Schedule 1 of the CWC’s Annex on
Chemicals, adding two classes of nerve agents developed during the Cold War—the Novichok class of
nerve agents as well as some carbamate compounds to the schedule, subjecting them to the CWC’s
declaration requirements and other restrictions. Use of Novichok and carbamate compounds as a weapon
was already prohibited under the CWC.
The most recent incident, the poisoning of Russian opposition figure and corruption investigator Alexei
Navalny in Tomsk, Russia, on August 20 again highlights the challenge of responding to CW use.
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN10936
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

---

Congressional Research Service
2
Navalny was med-evacuated to Germany on August 22 for treatment. The German Prime Minister Angela
Merkel stated on September 2, “Alexei Navalny was the victim of an attack with a chemical nerve agent
from the Novichok group.” The White House National Security Council twitter feed stated, “We will
work with allies and the international community to hold those in Russia accountable, wherever the
evidence leads, and restrict funds for their malign activities. The Russian people have a right to express
their views peacefully without fear of retribution of any kind, and certainly not with chemical agents.”
NATO countries on September 4 strongly condemned the attack and called on Russia to cooperate with an
OPCW investigation into the matter and to disclose the Novichok program in full. Russia is a party to the
CWC.
The Director General of the OPCW Fernando Arias said on September 3 that under the CWC, “any
poisoning of an individual through the use of a nerve agent is considered a use of chemical weapons,” and
the organization would respond to any requests for assistance. Under Article 9, CWC states may request
challenge inspections at facilities in member states suspected to be in violation of the convention. To date,
the CWC challenge inspection provision has never been invoked. Articles 9 and 10 of the CWC provide
for investigations into use of chemical weapons on the territory of a CWC State Party.
The OPCW could potentially investigate the Navalny poisoning as it has done in other recent cases. The
OPCW assisted the Malaysian government in its investigation of the February 2017 use of VX there.
OPCW Technical Assistance Visit (TAV) teams also aided Iraqi security forces’ investigations and
confirmed after a June 2017 visit that a non-state actor had used sulfur mustard blister agent in northern
Iraq. At the UK government’s request, the OPCW sent a TAV team to assist with the 2018 investigation of
the Skripal poisoning in Salisbury. A second OPCW TAV returned when two other UK citizens, one
deceased, were contaminated by the nerve agent. OPCW inspectors concurred with the UK technical
analysis of Novichok use in Salisbury. The OPCW has sent multiple investigatory teams to Syria: a
Declaration Assessment Team (DAT), to verify Syrian government compliance with the CWC; a Fact-
Finding Mission (FFM), tasked with confirming reported incidents of CW use; a UNSC-authorized Joint
Investigative Mechanism until 2017; and the OPCW Investigation and Identification Team (IIT)
established in 2018.
Recent CW use by Syria, North Korea, and Russia has triggered U.S. sanctions under the Chemical and
Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 (CBW Act), which requires a
determination of use. The U.S. State Department determined that North Korea’s government ordered the
VX attack in 2017 in Malaysia. The U.S. also concurred with the UK that Russia was responsible for the
Salisbury attack in violation of the CWC in 2018. Sanctions under the CBW Act were imposed on Russia,
but waivers were invoked by the Trump Administration.
Congress may wish to consider how best to respond to the use of chemical weapons, including how future
use could be deterred, and whether U.S. forces are adequately protected. Congress may consider whether
the OPCW has adequate resources for investigations, and it may also examine the success of efforts to
curb proliferation of chemical weapons-related material and technology, such as interdictions,
international sanctions, and export-control assistance programs.

---

Congressional Research Service
3
Author Information

Mary Beth D. Nikitin

Specialist in Nonproliferation




Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

IN10936 · VERSION 5 · UPDATED

---