
 
 
June 30, 2020
New Census Bureau Products Track COVID-19’s Effects
Introduction 
another to avoid overburdening respondents. The sample 
In May 2020, the U.S. Census Bureau released its first 
included four panels in the second and third weeks and is 
findings from the new Household Pulse and Small Business 
including three subsequently. The bureau stated that this 
Pulse Surveys. These experimental products are designed to 
design can offer insights into “how household experiences 
track the effects of the novel coronavirus disease—first 
changed during the pandemic.” 
observed in Wuhan, China, in 2019 (COVID-19)  and 
declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization in 
Advantages and Limitations 
March 2020. The bureau defines such products as those 
The Census Bureau has noted that efforts are underway to 
“using new data sources or methodologies that benefit data 
introduce new questions about COVID-19 into the 
users in the absence of other relevant products.” Long 
statistical agencies’ benchmark surveys. Producing these 
before COVID-19 struck, the federal statistical system 
surveys, however, is “a highly deliberative process,” so data 
produced data that could gauge changes in mortality, health 
on the pandemic might not be released for months or years. 
status, food supplies, unemployment, and business 
The Household Pulse Survey, in contrast, has a short 
conditions, among other important variables. Not 
turnaround time. Although response rates may be 
previously available, however, were the kind of data now 
considerably lower than in the bureau’s traditional surveys, 
provided by the pulse surveys, which are not only detailed 
the pulse survey’s benefits include, in the bureau’s words, 
but also being disseminated in almost real time to help 
“implementation efficiency, cost, and timeliness of 
policymakers respond to the pandemic and plan for 
responses.” 
recovery. 
Because, as the bureau has explained, “experimental data 
Household Pulse Survey 
may not meet all” of its quality standards, it clearly 
The Household Pulse Survey questionnaire is the product of 
identifies the pulse survey data, provides technical 
collaboration among some of the major agencies in the 
documentation, includes a “Source and Accuracy 
federal statistical system, led by the Census Bureau 
Statement” with each release, and invites user feedback 
(Department of Commerce), which is conducting the survey 
about data quality and usefulness. (For an example of a 
and presenting the results. The other collaborators are the 
“Source and Accuracy Statement,” see 
Economic Research Service (Department of Agriculture), 
https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS, Department of Labor), 
technical-documentation/hhp/Source-and-Accuracy-
National Center for Health Statistics (Department of Health 
Statement-May-21-May-26.pdf.) 
and Human Services), National Center for Education 
Statistics (Department of Education), and Department of 
Illustrative Findings: May 21 to May 26, 2020 
Housing and Urban Development, with input from the 
As previously mentioned, Household Pulse Survey results 
Office of Management and Budget. The topics covered are 
are available weekly. The May 21 to May 26 period, 
individuals’ “employment status, spending patterns, food 
highlighted below at the national level, was one in which 
security, housing, physical and mental health, access to 
children could have been meeting educational requirements 
health care, and educational disruption.” Responses are 
from home before the end of the school year, and adults 
made online and are voluntary. 
could have been largely responsible for teaching them. 
Adults, with or without children, could have been facing 
Level of Geography and Frequency 
multiple other challenges, which the survey results indicate. 
The Census Bureau is producing statistics from the survey 
for the 50 states, the District of Columbia (DC), and the 15 
Time devoted to teaching activities. Adults living with 
most populous metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs). 
children enrolled in public or private schools reported 
spending an average of 11.7 hours in the past week (that is, 
Data collection began on April 23, 2020, and is to continue 
the week before respondents answered the survey) on 
for 90 days, with weekly data releases. 
teaching activities with the children. 
Sample Design 
Loss of employment income. Adults living with children 
The survey draws on a systematic sample of housing units 
under age 18 were more likely than adults in childless 
from the Census Bureau’s Master Address File, 
households (55.3% versus 43.3%) to report loss of 
supplemented by email addresses and mobile telephone 
employment income since March 13, 2020. 
numbers from the bureau’s Contact Frame. The initial 
sample, according to the bureau, was divided into three 
Food. Whereas 22.3% of adults reported that, before March 
panels, and each was interviewed up to three times. In 
13, their households had enough food, but not always the 
successive weeks, the bureau is replacing one panel with 
types of food wanted, 31.1% of adults reported this 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
New  Census Bureau Products  Track COVID-19’s  Effects 
situation for the past seven days. The proportions who 
The first data from the survey became available on May 14, 
responded that, before March 13, the household sometimes 
2020; weekly data releases have continued through June.   
or often did not have enough to eat were 6.5% and 2.0% 
respectively, compared with 7.5% and 2.3%, respectively, 
Sample Design 
over the past week. Of adults living with children, 9.4% 
The survey’s target population is all nonfarm, single-
reported sometimes not having enough food for their 
location businesses with fewer than 500 employees and 
households before March 13; 2.6% reported often not 
annual receipts of at least $1,000 in the 50 states, DC, and 
having enough food. These adults acknowledged that they 
Puerto Rico. Businesses eligible to participate in the survey 
sometimes (10.6%) or often (2.9%) lacked enough food for 
are those that responded to the 2017 Economic Census. The 
their households in the past seven days. Unemployed adults 
sample had about 940,500 businesses in the first week and 
living with children reported sometimes (14.8%) or often 
has had about 885,000 since then, after email addresses 
(4.9%) having insufficient food for their households in the 
linked to multiple businesses were removed. As the Census 
last week. 
Bureau explained, the sample is divided into nine panels to 
reduce the burden on respondents. 
Mental Health. Over half of adults (55.1%) reported 
“feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge”; 47.2% reported 
Advantages and Limitations 
“having little interest or pleasure in doing things”; and 
A key advantage of the survey, as of its household 
44.8% acknowledged “feeling down, depressed, or 
counterpart, is that it provides frequent, detailed 
hopeless” for “several days,” “more than half the days,” or 
information on the topics covered. 
“nearly every day” during the past week. 
The Census Bureau has pointed out that although the 
Housing. Of adults living in homes that they owned with 
sample for the pulse survey is not a probability sample, 
mortgages, 7.2% reported not having made the previous 
“weights were applied to ensure that each weekly panel 
month’s mortgage payment, while 14.9% of adults living in 
represented the full population.” 
rented housing did not pay the past month’s rent. As for 
confidence that they could make the next month’s payment, 
The survey’s definition of “small business” may differ from 
4.7% of owners with mortgages and 13.2% of renters 
the definition(s) used by other organizations or federal 
expressed “no confidence”; the respective proportions rose 
agencies. 
to 7.7% and 18.4% among those not currently employed. 
Nonresponse bias could affect the survey; businesses closed   
Small Business Pulse Survey 
due to the pandemic might not respond because they have 
Agencies collaborating on the Small Business Pulse Survey 
not received the bureau’s request to do so. Also, the survey 
include, among others, the Small Business Administration, 
estimates could be biased if businesses participating in the 
Minority Business Development Administration and 
survey differ systematically from nonparticipants. 
Bureau of Economic Analysis (both in the Department of 
Commerce), and BLS. 
Illustrative Findings: May 24 to May 30, 2020 
In response to the survey question, “Overall, how has this 
The survey questionnaire collects information about altered 
business been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic?”, a 
conditions facing small businesses during the pandemic, 
national average of 42.9% of businesses reported a “large 
including “overall impact, change in revenues, temporary 
negative effect.” More than half (54.0%) reported decreased 
closings, change in employees, change in employee hours, 
“revenues/sales/receipts” in the past week (referring to the 
supply chain, shift to other goods/services, pickup/carry-
week before businesses answered the survey); 28.4% 
out/delivery, cash on hand, missed loan payments, missed 
reported temporary closings; 13.7% answered that they had 
other payments, requested assistance, received assistance, 
fewer paid employees; and 28.8% reported that the paid 
[and] outlook” about future operations. Responses, like 
employees worked fewer hours. Disruptions in the supply 
those for the Household Pulse Survey, are online and 
chain were noted by 37.0% of businesses. Three-quarters 
voluntary. 
(75.1%) acknowledged requesting assistance from the 
Paycheck Protection Program (see CRS Report R46284, 
Level of Geography and Frequency 
COVID-19 Relief Assistance to Small Businesses: Issues 
The Census Bureau is releasing survey results by state and 
and Policy Options) since March 13, 2020, and 71.0% 
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 
reported receiving assistance from this source since March 
sector and for the 50 most populous MSAs. Examples of 
13. Responding to the question “how much time do you 
NAICS sectors considered in scope for the survey are 
think will pass before this business returns to its normal 
construction; manufacturing; mining, quarrying, and oil and 
level of operations relative to one year ago?”, 41.2% 
gas extraction; transportation and warehousing; utilities; 
answered “more than six months,” while 9.6% did not think 
administrative, support, waste management, and 
the business would return to its normal level of operations. 
remediation services; accommodation and food services; 
retail trade; wholesale trade; healthcare and social 
Jennifer D. Williams, Specialist in American National 
assistance; real estate, rental, and leasing; management of 
Government   
companies and enterprises; information; finance and 
insurance; professional, scientific, and technical services; 
IF11594
educational services; and arts, entertainment, and 
recreation. 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
New  Census Bureau Products  Track COVID-19’s  Effects 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permissio n of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11594  · VERSION  1 · NEW