INSIGHTi

The COVID-19 Health Care Provider
Relief Fund

June 26, 2020
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, some health care providers limited in-person visits and cancelled
elective procedures
to reduce the spread of COVID-19, prepare for COVID-19 patients, and conserve
personal protective equipment. As a consequence, some providers reported forgone revenue and/or
significant financial challenges, making it difficult to sustain services. To address these concerns,
Congress established the Provider Relief Fund (PRF, or the Fund) in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security (CARES) Act (P.L. 116-136) and appropriated $100 billion “to reimburse, through
grants or other mechanisms, eligible health care providers for health care related expenses or lost
revenues that are attributable to coronavirus.” The Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care
Enhancement Act (PPPHCEA, P.L. 116-139) added an additional $75 billion to the Fund.
The PRF provides grants to eligible health care providers, defined in the law as “public entities, Medicare
or Medicaid enrolled suppliers and providers, and such for-profit entities and not-for-profit entities not
otherwise described in this proviso as the Secretary may specify, within the United States (including
territories), that provide diagnoses, testing, or care for individuals with possible or actual cases of
COVID–19.” Funds do not have to be repaid as long as the provider meets the Fund’s terms and
conditions.
This differs from other provider support programs, such as the Accelerated and Advanced
Payment Program (AAP), expanded in the CARES Act, which provides advance Medicare payments. The
AAP has since been suspended as providers are directed to apply to the PRF. Some providers may have
received funds from both programs. Some providers (e.g., physician practices) may also be eligible for
loans from the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), and can receive funds from both the PRF and PPP, so
long as the funds are not duplicative.
Fund Administration
The PRF is administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) within the
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). HRSA also administers a related fund that provides
reimbursement for COVID-19 testing and treatment for the uninsured, with a portion of PRF funds
allocated for uninsured treatment. Both the PRF and the uninsured fund are administered under contract
with the UnitedHealth Group.
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
IN11438
CRS INSIGHT
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress




Congressional Research Service
2
Eligibility, Terms, and Conditions
To receive PRF funds, providers must submit an application with their tax ID number and required
revenue information. After receiving funds, providers must agree to the terms and conditions, namely,
among others, certification that the funds will be used to prepare for or treat COVID-19 patients or for
lost revenue and will not be used to duplicate another source of payment, and agreement to submit
documentation. Providers also must agree that for all care provided to presumptive or positive COVID-19
cases they “will not seek to collect from the patient out-of-pocket expenses in an amount greater than
what the patient would have otherwise been required to pay if the care had been provided by an in-
network recipient.” In other words, for COVID-19-related care, PRF fund recipients agree not to surprise-
bill patients with presumptive or actual COVID-19. Providers who receive PRF funds for uninsured
COVID-19 care must agree to accept that reimbursement as payment in full.
Allocations
PRF funds are being distributed through general and targeted allocations.
$50 Billion General Distribution:
 $30 billion to health care providers who billed Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) based on
that revenue in 2019.
 An additional $20 billion to some of the same Medicare FFS providers such that the net
allocation of the $50 billion is based on providers’ net patient revenue for 2018 (or the
most recently completed tax year) or the sum of losses incurred for March and April
2020, whichever is less.
Targeted Allocations:
$10 billion, High-Impact Hospitals: to hospitals with 100 or more COVID-19 inpatients,
proportional to the hospital’s COVID-19 case load. On June 8, 2020, HHS asked
hospitals
to update COVID-19 admissions data for a planned second $10 billion high-
impact allocation.
$2 billion, High-Impact Safety Net Hospitals: to high-impact hospitals based on their
prior uncompensated care volume.
$10 billion, Rural Distribution: to rural hospitals, rural health clinics, and rural
community health centers, with each provider receiving a base payment (that varied by
provider type) and an adjustment for the provider’s operating expenses.
$4.9 billion, Nursing Homes: to skilled nursing facilities, with a base payment to each
facility and additional amounts based on patient volume.
Uninsured (amount not specified): to reimburse facilities that provided COVID-19 care to
uninsured patients.
$500 million, Indian Health Service facilities: to facilities operated by the Indian Health
Service, Indian Tribes, and Urban Indian Organizations based on type of facility,
operating expenses, and patient volume.
$10 billion, Safety Net Hospitals-Payments: awards ranging from $5 million to $500
million, to hospitals that serve a disproportionate number of Medicaid patients, have
profitability of 3% or less, or provide large amounts of uncompensated care.
$15 billion, Medicaid and CHIP Providers: HHS sought revenue data from Medicaid and
State Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) providers that


Congressional Research Service
3
did not receive allocations from the general distribution to allocate up to 2% of the
provider’s gross patient revenue.
In total, HHS has announced PRF allocations of more than $112 billion of the $175 billion available. This
does not include the amount that will be reimbursed for uninsured care. HHS has also stated that it is
working to determine a methodology to allocate funds to dentists.
PRF Data
HHS has released data on PRF payments and has provided information on targeted allocation recipients
by state and Congressional District. Data are updated twice weekly.
Congressional Considerations
The House-passed HEROES Act (H.R. 6800) would appropriate an additional $100 billion to the PRF. The
bill also would define lost revenue more explicitly; weight PRF distributions toward Medicaid providers;
take into account other funds a provider received for COVID-19 relief; and apply surprise billing
restrictions
to unobligated PRF funds, newly appropriated PRF funds, and any future PRF appropriations.
Under current law, the restrictions are limited to COVID-19-related testing and care. The act also would
require a final audit of the PRF by the HHS Inspector General (IG); currently, the (IG) is conducting an
audit
of 2020 PRF allocations.

Author Information

Elayne J. Heisler

Specialist in Health Services




Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
IN11438 · VERSION 1 · NEW