
 
 
April 16, 2020
Department of Justice’s Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental 
Funding Program
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act 
the three-year average number of violent crimes committed 
(CARES Act, P.L. 116-136) provided $850 million to the 
in its respective state. Only units of local government that 
Department of Justice (DOJ) to be awarded to state and 
would receive $10,000 or more are eligible for a direct 
local governments to help them “prevent, prepare for, and 
allocation. The balance of funds not awarded directly to 
respond to coronavirus, domestically or internationally.” 
units of local government is administered by the state and 
DOJ is awarding this funding under its Coronavirus 
must be distributed to the state police department or to units 
Emergency Supplemental Funding (CESF) program, which 
of local government that were not eligible to receive a 
is being administered by the Bureau of Justice Assistance 
direct award from BJA. Also, each state is required to “pass 
(BJA). 
through” to units of local government a certain percentage 
of the funds directly awarded to the state. The pass-through 
Per the CARES Act, the $850 million is to be allocated 
percentage is calculated as the ratio of the total amount of 
“pursuant to the formula allocation (adjusted in proportion 
state expenditures on criminal justice for the most recent 
to the relative amounts statutorily designated therefor) that 
fiscal year to the total amount of expenditures on criminal 
was used in fiscal year 2019 for the Edward Byrne 
justice by both the state and all units of local government in 
Memorial Justice Assistance Grant [JAG] program.” 
the past fiscal year. Pass-through percentages for each state 
However, the act also states that “allocation provisions 
are calculated by the Bureau of Justice Statistics using data 
under sections 505(a) through (e) … of the [Omnibus 
on state and government expenditures collected by the U.S. 
Crime Control and Safe Streets Acts of 1968, P.L. 90-351], 
Census Bureau and grant award data from the Federal 
shall not apply to the amount provided under this heading in 
Award Assistance Data System. 
this Act.”  
In effect, while the JAG program formula was used to 
                    Disparate Allocation 
determine which state and local governments are eligible to 
In some instances, a unit of local government or 
receive funding under the CESF program and the amount of 
multiple units of local government are required to 
their allocation, many of the requirements of the JAG 
collaborate on a single joint award with the county. 
program do not apply to funds awarded under the CESF 
This happens when BJA certifies that there is a 
program.  
“disparate allocation,” meaning that one city qualifies 
for an amount that is one-and-a-half times more than 
Brief Overview of the JAG Formula 
the amount for the county with concurrent 
Under the JAG formula, each state’s allocation is based on 
jurisdiction, or when the total amount cities in a single 
its population and the number of reported violent crimes in 
county qualify for is four-times more than the amount 
the state. Specifically, half of a state’s allocation is based on 
for the county. The unit or units of local government 
the state’s respective share of the U.S. population. The 
and county representatives must sign and submit a 
other half is based on the state’s respective share of the 
memorandum of understanding stating that they all 
average number of violent crimes reported to the Federal 
agree on how the joint award, which is the sum of all 
Bureau of Investigation for the three most recent years for 
of the individual awards, will be allocated and used. 
which data are available. Under current law, each state is 
 
guaranteed to receive no less than 0.25% of the amount 
For more information on the JAG program, see CRS In 
appropriated for the JAG program in a given fiscal year 
Focus IF10691, The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice 
(i.e., the minimum allocation). When calculating 
Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. 
allocations, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. 
Virgin Islands, and Guam are considered to be states; 
The CESF Program 
American Samoa and the Northern Mariana Islands are 
BJA has released calculated allocations for state and local 
considered to be one “state,” and their allocation is split 
governments and is accepting applications for grants until 
with 67% going to American Samoa and 33% going to the 
May 29, 2020. Grants under this program are not 
Northern Mariana Islands. 
automatically awarded to state and local governments; they 
have to apply to receive funding. However, grants are not 
After each state’s allocation is determined, 40% of it is 
competitive, so if an eligible jurisdiction submits a fundable 
directly awarded to units of local government in the state 
application it is to receive a grant. 
(this does not occur in the District of Columbia or the 
territories). Awards to units of local government, which 
Grants under the CESF can be used for, but are not limited 
includes Indian tribes that have law enforcement 
to, overtime, equipment (including law enforcement and 
responsibilities, are based on the jurisdiction’s proportion of 
medical personal protective equipment), hiring, supplies 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Department of Justice’s Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program 
(such as gloves, masks, sanitizer), training, travel expenses, 
counties received funding under the CESF program, BJA 
and addressing the medical needs of inmates in state, local, 
took an amount equal to what was awarded to jurisdictions 
and tribal prisons, jails, and detention centers. BJA is to 
that received less than $10,000 under the FY2019 JAG 
determine whether requests to spend CESF funding on 
program ($20.4 million) and distributed it equally among 
projects or purchases other than those listed are allowable 
the 351 zero counties, resulting in an award of $58,008 for 
under the program (i.e., do they help the applicant prevent, 
each of these counties. 
prepare for, and respond to Coronavirus?). 
Allocations under the CESF Program 
                CESF Allocation Calculations 
All states, the District of Columbia, and each of the five 
 
territories are eligible to receive funding under the CESF 
CESF appropriation: $850.0 million 
program because they received an FY2019 JAG award. 
 
Only local governments that were eligible to receive a 
Amount available for allocation for FY2019 
direct award from BJA under the FY2019 JAG program are 
through JAG: $263.8 million = $160.7 million in 
eligible to receive grants under the CESF program. 
state base funding + $20.4 million for jurisdictions that 
received less than $10,000 + $82.7 million in direct 
With a few exceptions, allocations were calculated by 
awards to local jurisdictions. 
multiplying eligible jurisdictions’ FY2019 JAG allocations 
 
by 3.22196, which was how many times greater the CESF 
Plus-up factor: CESF appropriation / amount 
appropriation was than the amount that was available to be 
available for allocation for FY2019 through JAG ≈ 
allocated under the JAG program for FY2019 ($263.8 
3.22196. 
million). 
 
State allocations: (state’s FY2019 JAG base funding 
Under the JAG program, state governments receive a base 
* 3.22196) + ((($20.4 million * 3.22196) - $20.4 
amount equal to 60% of the state’s calculated allocation 
million) / 56). 
plus an amount equal to the total for all local jurisdictions 
 
in the state whose calculated allocations were less than 
Non-zero county local jurisdiction allocations: 
$10,000. Under the CESF program, a state’s allocation is 
FY2019 JAG allocation * 3.22196 
equal to its FY2019 base allocation multiplied by 3.22196 
 
plus $807,876. The additional $807,876 each state received 
Zero county allocations: $20.4 million / 351 zero 
is equal to the total amount allocated to jurisdictions that 
counties. 
received less than $10,000 for FY2019 ($20.4 million) 
multiplied by 3.22196 with an amount subtracted for 
 
awards to counties that were not eligible for a direct award 
Helpful Websites 
for FY2019 (see below) and equally divided between the 50 
states, the District of Columbia, and the five territories. 
  State CESF allocations: https://bja.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/
Under the CESF program, states are not required to award 
xyckuh186/files/media/document/fy20-cesf-state-
the $807,876 they receive to jurisdictions that are not 
allocations.pdf 
eligible to apply for a direct award from BJA. Also, the 
pass-through requirement under the JAG program does not 
  Local governments’ CESF allocations: 
apply to CESF funds. 
https://bja.ojp.gov/program/fy20-cesf-allocations 
Some counties with disparate allocations in FY2019 are not 
  CESF program grant solicitation: https://bja.ojp.gov/
eligible to receive any funding because they did not report 
sites/g/files/xyckuh186/files/media/document/bja-2020-
any violent crime data, yet they had expenses related to the 
18553.pdf 
operation of the criminal justice system, such as operating a 
jail or funding a district attorney’s office (so-called zero 
  CESF awards: https://bja.ojp.gov/funding/fy20-cesf-
counties). Under the JAG program, these counties would 
awards 
typically receive some funding or would benefit from a 
JAG-funded program or project because they would have to 
Nathan James, Analyst in Crime Policy   
apply for a joint award with other cities in the county. 
However, under the CESF program the disparate allocation 
IF11508
requirement is not applicable. In order to ensure that zero 
 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Department of Justice’s Coronavirus Emergency Supplemental Funding Program 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11508 · VERSION 2 · NEW