Legal Sidebari

COVID-19 Pandemic’s Effect on Government
Contracts
March 24, 2020
The COVID-19 pandemic and related mandates and recommendations to practice social distancing, work
from home, shelter in place, and self-quarantine impact government contracts by disrupting supply chains
and business operations. These disruptions may make it difficult and potentially impossible for some
federal contractors to perform government procurement contracts as originally contemplated. Disruptions
will likely alter government procurement priorities and have prompted questions about how the novel
COVID-19 pandemic might affect federal acquisitions and government contractor performance. The
pandemic’s effect on existing federal contracts will depend in large part upon agency needs, the duration
of pandemic response actions, and each contract’s type and terms. Legal principles underlying standard
contract clauses that often must be incorporated in procurement contracts under the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) and agency-specific FAR supplements like the Department of Defense’s (DoD’s)
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) will likely guide how agencies and
contractors respond to the pandemic. Additionally, federal emergency response laws, such as the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Stafford Act) and the Defense Production Act of
1950 (DPA), could impact how agencies acquire goods and services to respond to the COVID-19
outbreak.
OMB Guidance on Contract Performance
On March 20, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued guidance on “steps to help ensure []
safety while maintaining continued contract performance in support of agency missions, wherever
possible and consistent with [public health] precautions.” Although contractors establish many of their
own workplace standards, the guidance recommends that agencies “work with their contractors . . . to
evaluate and maximize telework for contractor employees, wherever possible.” It also encourages
agencies to be flexible when administering contracts by providing extensions on deadlines when
necessary because of “COVID-19 related interruptions.” The guidance also notes that agencies should
evaluate “whether it is beneficial to keep skilled professionals or key personnel in a mobile ready state for
activities the agency deems critical to national security or other high priorities.” Finally, the guidance
urges agencies, when appropriate, to use procurement law flexibilities triggered when the President
declared the COVID-19 outbreak an emergency under the Stafford Act.
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
LSB10428
CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

---

Congressional Research Service
2
Under some circumstances, an agency can use more streamlined procurement procedures, called
“simplified acquisition procedures,” for small-dollar purchases. The thresholds for simplified acquisition
procedures are higher for procurements that support a federally declared major disaster or emergency.
Additionally, the Competition in Contracting Act of 1984 (CICA) permits agencies to make sole-source
(i.e., noncompetitive) awards when justified, including when the need for the service or good is of such an
“unusual and compelling urgency” that the government potentially could suffer serious harm if it
followed typical competition procedures. Agency acquisitions in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
might trigger circumstances that justify sole-source awards.
Legal Mechanisms to Address COVID-19-Related Performance
Several standard federal procurement contract provisions provide processes by which the government and
contractors can adapt to COVID-19-related unexpected circumstances. The clauses include Excusable
Delay provisions, Changes clauses, Stop-Work Order provisions, Termination for Convenience clauses,
and Continuation of Essential Contractor Services provisions. Use of these clauses could affect the cost
and timing of contract performance.
Excusable Delays
The FAR requires that many federal contracts include an Excusable Delay contract provision. This
provision provides contractors protections from default liability for delays triggered by events outside a
contractor’s or contracting agency’s control. Triggering events can include “acts of God,” “unusually
severe weather,” as well as “epidemics” and “quarantine restrictions.” This clause potentially could
authorize contractors who cannot perform work on time because of the COVID-19 pandemic more time
to complete performance without suffering contractual consequences (such as payment of liquidated
damages). While some contractors might receive schedule relief (i.e., more time to perform) under this
clause, it likely would not authorize additional compensation, even if the COVID-19 pandemic increases
contract costs. However, other contract provisions potentially could allow COVID-19-related cost relief,
under other contract clauses described below.
Changes Clauses
Federal procurement contracts generally must include some variation of a Changes clause. These clauses
authorize contracting officers to enter into a change order to address changed realities that were not
contemplated at contract consummation. In some cases, the parties can negotiate an “equitable
adjustment” to account for reasonable increases or decreases in costs associated with such changes, when
warranted. Depending on the facts and circumstances, some contracts might need to be performed during
the COVID-19 pandemic, while other contracts could be curtailed or terminated.
The Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, for example,
issued guidance identifying essential critical infrastructure contractors that are “needed to maintain the
services and functions Americans depend on daily and that need to be able to operate resiliently during
the COVID-19 pandemic response.” The guidance identifies essential operations in several industries,
including healthcare, public health, communications, information technology, and law enforcement. If a
contract is performed but is subject to COVID-19-related adjustments, those adjustments might justify
reasonable cost increases or schedule relief under a Changes clause. For example, if a contractor must
comply with new, agency-mandated COVID-19 security and sanitation protocols, the contractor might be
able to recover the reasonable cost increases of following the heightened standards.
In other instances, the pandemic could reduce the government’s need for supplies or services. These
circumstances might warrant a reduction in contractor compensation. For example, if virtually all
employees that would normally work in a building are working remotely because of COVID-19’s health

---

Congressional Research Service
3
risks, it may be unnecessary and contrary to the health-based telework policy for contractors to perform
non-essential administrative services in federal buildings during the COVID-19 pandemic. Similarly, an
agency might not need the same quantity of supplies originally contemplated with the bulk of its
employees working remotely. This could prompt agencies, unilaterally or through negotiations, to execute
changes to contracts to reflect the reduced need for supplies and services, along with reduced costs
commensurate with those changes.
Stop-Work Orders
In some cases, an agency might order a contractor to suspend or delay performance on a specific contract
under a Stop-Work Order clause. These clauses, which are required in certain non-construction contracts,
permit agency personnel to order a contractor to “stop all, or any part, of the work called for by this
contract for a period of 90 days after the order is delivered to the Contractor, and for any further period to
which the parties may agree.” When Stop-Work Order clauses are triggered, contractors generally have a
right to an “equitable adjustment” of the contract to receive reasonable costs associated with halting and
restarting the contract. When implementing stop-work orders, contractors also are generally required to
“take all reasonable steps to minimize the incurrence of costs” to the government, which could force
contractors to reassign employees to other projects, place employees on unpaid leave, or terminate
employees, at least temporarily.
Termination for Convenience
Contracting officers, in some cases, can exercise the right to terminate a contract for the government’s
convenience. For example, a commonly required Termination for Convenience clause states, in its
entirety:
The Contracting Officer, by written notice, may terminate this contract, in whole or in part, when it
is in the Government's interest. If this contract is terminated, the Government shall be liable only
for payment under the payment provisions of this contract for services rendered before the effective
date of termination.
After terminating for convenience, the government is generally only required to pay for work performed
before the termination.
Continuation of Contractor Services to DoD
The COVID-19 pandemic also could trigger contractor responsibilities under a Continuation of Essential
Contractor Services clause included in certain DoD contracts. The clause generally requires contractors
that perform an essential contractor service or mission-essential functions for DoD to execute plans to
continue providing those services, “during periods of crisis,” which potentially could include the COVID-
19 pandemic. The clause defines “essential contractor service” as a “service provided by a firm or
individual under contract to DoD to support mission-essential functions, such as support of vital
systems.” Under the clause, “[s]ervices are essential if the effectiveness of defense systems or operations
has the potential to be seriously impaired by the interruption of these services.” The clause defines
mission-essential functions as “those organizational activities that must be performed under all
circumstances to achieve DoD component missions or responsibilities.” A contractor that may not be able
to continue performance of these essential functions must inform agency personnel “as expeditiously as
possible and use its best efforts to cooperate with the Government in the Government’s efforts to maintain
the continuity of operations.” The DFARS authorizes the parties to make reasonable cost adjustments to
the contract to account for any increase or decrease in “costs incurred in continuing performance of
essential services in a crisis situation.”

---

Congressional Research Service
4

Defense Production Act
On Wednesday, March 18, the President issued an executive order (EO) delegating certain powers under
the DPA to account for the national security concerns posed by the COVID-19 outbreak. The DPA
authorizes the federal government to mobilize private industry to provide the government with various
supplies and services necessary to support the national defense. The law defines the term national defense
to cover various military activities, “homeland security, stockpiling, space, and any directly related
activity,” including public health emergency preparedness activities under the Stafford Act. The DPA
authorizes the President, among other things, to require private businesses to accept and prioritize federal
government procurement contracts and to incentivize private industry to produce goods and materials
needed to support the national defense, through purchase commitments, loans, loan guarantees, and other
mechanisms.
In the DPA EO, the President delegated certain DPA authorities to the Secretary of Health and Human
Services (HHS), in consultation with other agency heads, to establish “the proper nationwide priorities
and allocation of all health and medical resources, including controlling the distribution of such materials
(including applicable services) in the civilian market, for responding to the spread of COVID-19 within
the United States.” Observers have discussed the potential that the HHS Secretary could exercise this
delegated DPA authority to enter into contracts with private businesses to acquire medical supplies used in
treating COVID-19 patients that reportedly are in short supply in the United States. Additional CRS
products on the DPA are available in this CRS Report, Insight, and Legal Sidebar.

Author Information

David H. Carpenter

Legislative Attorney




Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

LSB10428 · VERSION 1 · NEW

---