March 19, 2020
Defense Primer: Department of Defense Maintenance Depots
Title 10, United States Code (U.S.C.) §2464 states that it is
How do the Maintenance Depots support
“essential for the national defense that the Department of
readiness?
Defense maintain a core logistics capability that is
DOD’s maintenance depots are GOGO facilities that are
government-owned and government-operated [GOGO]... to
capable of performing complete overhauls of military
ensure a ready and controlled source of technical
weapon systems, as well as repairs to many individual
competence and resources necessary to ensure effective and
components within each weapon system. Many of the
timely response to a mobilization, national defense
maintenance depots also have the ability to send mobile
contingency situations, and other emergency requirements.”
repair teams to operating locations to perform on-site
Accordingly, each military service owns and operates
technical assistance or in-depth repairs. As the Government
industrial facilities that manufacture, maintain, repair, and
Accountability Office (GAO) states in its 2019 report
overhaul military weapons and equipment. These GOGO
(GAO-19-242), these depots “are crucial to maintaining
facilities, together with certain government-owned,
military readiness by ensuring that the services can
contractor-operated (GOCO) facilities are collectively
regularly repair critical weapon systems and return them to
referred to as the organic industrial base, or OIB.
the warfighter for their use in training and operations.” The
maintenance depots also serve as a repository for technical
Included in the OIB are several large-scale maintenance
data, testing equipment, and unique tooling and design
facilities (otherwise named depots, shipyards, production
capabilities for many weapon systems.
plants, logistics complexes, or readiness centers) owned by
each service that are dedicated to performing depot-level
Organization and Management
maintenance and repair (collectively the “maintenance
Each military service includes command structures with
depots”). In addition, the Air Force and Navy utilize several
responsibility for providing logistics and maintenance
“centers” that perform weapon systems support in the forms
support to the majority of its weapon systems and
of research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E),
equipment. Within each service, there are dedicated
acquisition, and sustainment activities including depot-level
maintenance depots whose primary responsibility is to
maintenance and repair. This InFocus pertains to those
conduct depot-level maintenance (Figure 1). However,
selected large-scale maintenance facilities that maintain,
depot-level maintenance can be performed at any location,
repair, or overhaul end items (See GAO-17-82R).
thus some facilities may not be identified as a maintenance
depot by DOD or other government agencies due to the
What is Depot-Level Maintenance?
scale or majority of work performed at that location.
Title 10 U.S.C. §2460 defines depot-level maintenance and
repair (commonly “depot maintenance” or “D-Level”
Figure 1. Selected DOD Maintenance Depot Sites
maintenance) as “material maintenance or repair requiring
the overhaul, upgrading, or rebuilding of parts, assemblies,
or subassemblies, and the testing and reclamation of
equipment as necessary, regardless of the source of funds
for the maintenance or repair or the location at which
the maintenance or repair is performed [emphasis added
by CRS].” The definition includes “(1) all aspects of
software maintenance classified by the Department of
Defense as of July 1, 1995, as depot-level maintenance and
repair, and (2) interim contractor support or contractor
logistics support (or any similar contractor support), to the
extent that such support is for the performance of services
described in the preceding sentence.”
Source: GAO-17-82R
Section 2460 specifically excludes certain activities such as
“the procurement of major modifications or upgrades of
Note: The identification of maintenance depot sites has changed
over time (e.g., see the 2008 DOD Maintenance Fact Book). No sites
weapon systems that are designed to improve program
were identified in Alaska, Hawai or the U.S. territories.
performance,” and the nuclear refueling or defueling of
aircraft carriers. Additionally, the procurement of parts for
Army
safety modifications is not considered depot maintenance,
however the installation of those parts is.
Army Materiel Command (AMC), headquartered at
Redstone Arsenal, AL, develops and delivers materiel
support to maintain combat equipment. AMC operates five
maintenance depots, each of which is generally responsible
for specific systems.
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Defense Primer: Department of Defense Maintenance Depots
Anniston Army Depot, AL: Combat vehicles, small
support and combat service support equipment. MDMC
caliber weapons, artil ery, and rail operations.
operates two production plants that perform depot-level
Corpus Christi Army Depot, TX: Rotary wing
maintenance.
aircraft.
Marine Corps Logistics Base Albany, GA: Ground-
Letterkenny Army Depot, PA: Air defense and
combat and combat-support equipment (East Coast).
tactical missile systems.
Marine Corps Logistics Base Barstow, CA: Ground-
Red River Army Depot, TX: Combat and tactical
combat and combat-support equipment (West Coast).
wheeled vehicles.
Relevant Legislation: Maintaining a Core
Tobyhanna Army Depot, PA: Electronic systems.
Logistics Capability
Air Force
Title 10 U.S.C. §2464 requires the Secretary of Defense, in
Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC), headquartered at
consultation with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, conducts RDT&E
to identify the core logistics capabilities necessary to
while also providing acquisition management and logistics
maintain and repair the weapons systems and other military
support. Under AFMC, the Air Force Sustainment Center,
equipment “as necessary to enable the armed forces to
located at Tinker Air Force Base, OK, directs the operations
fulfill the strategic and contingency plans prepared by the
of the three Air Logistics Complexes (ALCs), each of
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under [10 U.S.C.
which generally performs work on specific weapon
§153(a)].” Section 2464 also requires the Secretary to
systems.
assign the maintenance depots “sufficient workload to
ensure cost efficiency and technical competence in
Ogden ALC, UT: Aircraft such as the F-35, F-22, and
peacetime while preserving ... surge capacity and
C-130 as well as Minuteman III Intercontinental Ballistic
reconstitution capabilities.”
Missiles.
Oklahoma City ALC, OK: Aircraft such as the B-1B
The 50/50 Statute
and B-52 as well as military aircraft engines.
Title 10 U.S.C. §2466, often referred to as the 50/50 statute,
Warner Robins ALC, GA: Aircraft such as the F-15,
states that not more than 50 percent of the funds made
C-5 and Special Operations Forces aircraft.
available in a fiscal year to a military department or defense
agency for depot-level maintenance and repair workload,
Navy
may be used to contract non-federal government personnel
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), headquartered
for the given workload. This prevents the outsourcing of a
majority of DOD’s
at the Washington Navy Yard in the District of Columbia,
maintenance depot workload, thus
operates the shipyards and has technical authority for ship
helping to ensure facilities, equipment, and personnel
maintenance operations. The four shipyards within
receive a sufficient peacetime workload to remain qualified
NAVSEA perform depot-level repairs on ships and
and available in times of emergency.
submarines as assigned.
The statutory ratio of public to private depot-level funds
Norfolk Naval Shipyard, VA.
expenditures has changed over time from a 70/30
Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, HI.
requirement when it was first enacted in 1982, to a 60/40
mix in the early nineties. The current 50/50 ratio was
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, ME.
enacted in 1997.
Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, WA.
For naval aviation, Naval Air Systems Command
The Six Percent Rule
(NAVAIR), headquartered in Patuxent River, MD, provides
Title 10 U.S.C. §2476 stipulates investment in the “capital
full life-cycle support of naval aviation aircraft, weapons,
budgets of the covered depots of that military department a
and systems. It is responsible for the operation of three
total amount equal to not less than six percent of the
aviation Fleet Readiness Centers (FRCs) providing support
average...workload at all the depots of that military
to both Navy and Marine Corps assets.
department for the preceding three fiscal years.” This
statute is often referred to as the 6 percent rule, and it
FRC East, NC: Fixed and rotary wing aircraft such as
applies to only those named sites in the statute. For those
the V-22, F/A-18, F-35, UH-1N and H-53 variants.
sites, the law ensures that departments invest in the
FRC Southeast, FL: Aircraft such as the P-3 and EA-
modernization “of depot facilities, equipment, work
6B, as well as multiple aircraft engines.
environment, or processes in direct support of depot
FRC Southwest, CA: Fixed and rotary wing aircraft
operations.” Investment in the capital budget of a covered
such as the AV-8B, E-2, H-60, AH-1 and UH-1 variants.
depot “does not include funds spent for sustainment of
existing facilities, infrastructure, or equipment.”
Marine Corps
Marine Corps Logistics Command (MARCORLOGCOM),
G. James Herrera, Analyst in U.S. Defense Readiness and
headquartered in Albany, GA, directs the Marine Depot
Infrastructure
Maintenance Command (MDMC) in repairing, rebuilding,
IF11466
and modifying all ground combat equipment, and combat
https://crsreports.congress.gov
Defense Primer: Department of Defense Maintenance Depots
Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress.
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF11466 · VERSION 1 · NEW