
 
Updated June 25, 2019
Blockchain and International Trade
Innovations in technology have the potential to enable and 
specific conditions are met, such as receipt of a delivery, 
disrupt international commerce (e.g., online shopping and 
without requiring manual intervention. These platforms 
drone delivery services). Along with emerging technologies 
may also open up new markets, including in developing 
such as artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things, 
countries where trade finance is not as readily available. 
blockchain may change the conduct of international trade, 
Logistics and Supply Chain Management 
including how it is financed, how companies manage 
A company may use a closed blockchain to manage supply 
supply chains, and how border officials vet imports. 
chains within a company. The company may use a separate 
Congress may face questions about the potential benefits 
blockchain to manage outside vendors and suppliers with 
and risks of this new technology and whether, or how, 
permissions set according to a user’s role. “Permissionless” 
blockchain should be regulated. 
blockchains, in contrast, are open to any user. 
What Is Blockchain? 
By improving workflow efficiency and visibility, 
Blockchain is a distributed record-keeping system (each 
blockchain enables companies to better track goods, 
user can keep a copy of the records) that uses encryption to 
including inputs, intermediate goods, and finished products. 
provide for auditable transactions. Using blockchain, each 
A blockchain platform can also include associated 
transaction is traceable to a user, each set of transactions is 
documentation, like certifications, provenance, and 
verifiable, and the data in the blockchain cannot be edited 
without user’s knowledge
payment information as products move through a complex 
. These blockchain features allow 
global supply chain, with greater fidelity than with current 
two or more parties without a trusted relationship to engage 
technologies. With blockchain, participants in the supply 
in reliable transactions without relying on intermediaries or 
chain, from the smallest vendor to the end consumer, can 
central authority (e.g., a bank or government). 
track and verify specific goods. 
Blockchain technology could potentially yield time and cost 
Tracking Conflict Diamonds 
savings in tracking business transactions. It has the 
potential to simplify business processes, reduce transaction 
To reduce theft and counterfeiting, Everledger built a blockchain 
costs, and allow companies to compete more efficiently. 
platform to track and trace individual diamonds as they move 
Some governments are similarly seeking to use blockchain.  
along the supply chain according to the Kimberley Process 
International Trade Uses 
Certification Scheme for conflict-free diamonds. Blockchain 
partners include insurers, financial institutions, and diamond 
Finance 
certification houses that are each able to track a diamond over 
Blockchain has many potential financial applications. For 
its lifetime. The blockchain (shared ledger) operates according to 
example, blockchain is the technology underlying Bitcoin 
rules set by smart contracts, and regulators gain visibility into 
and other cryptocurrencies that can be used to make 
and provide oversight of the entire supply chain. 
payments without banks or other third-party intermediaries. 
While cryptocurrencies potentially could create a more 
efficient payment system, they involve risks (there have 
To monitor the quality of the goods, such as perishable 
been instances of compromised exchanges) and security 
agricultural shipments, a blockchain could include data 
concerns. Certain federal agencies have claimed regulatory 
gathered by devices such as an embedded sensor in a 
authority over aspects of the cryptocurrency industry, but 
shipping container to track location, and another sensor to 
the patchwork regulatory regime involving multiple 
ensure that a good is not tampered with or to monitor a 
agencies at times creates regulatory ambiguity. 
shipment’s temperature. Being able to track individual 
shipments could facilitate a recall, if needed, or could help 
Traditional financial services firms are also experimenting 
authorities identify where along a supply chain a product 
with blockchain technology. For example, Fidelity’s new 
was potentially tampered with or where adulteration 
digital assets division will provide custodial services for 
occurred, but would not preempt the malicious action.  
cryptocurrency trading. By using blockchain technology, 
banks could settle cross-border transactions in seconds, 
For example, the Walmart Food Traceability Initiative, 
rather than days, with fewer steps and less complexity. 
launched in September 2018, tracks the firm’s supply of 
fresh leafy greens. Walmart aims to increase consumer trust 
Multiple banks have developed trade finance pilots using 
and food safety for a product that has been the subject of 
blockchain platforms. For example, 14 European banks 
multiple U.S. foodborne illness outbreaks. The company 
built a trade finance platform to offer services to enable 
plans to expand its blockchain efforts to other food products 
international trade by small and medium enterprises 
sourced both domestically and internationally. Walmart is 
(SMEs). These blockchain-based platforms may include 
part of an industry consortium seeking to align the 
smart contracts that automatically execute according to a set 
blockchain infrastructure (e.g., establishing common data 
of business rules. The SMEs, shippers, and other firms in 
elements), to create scalability for suppliers such as small 
the blockchain would be able to track individual orders and 
farmers distributing products to multiple companies. 
use smart contracts to trigger payments automatically when 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Blockchain and International Trade 
Selected Policy Issues 
Examples/Goals of Blockchain Uses 
The growth in blockchain applications related to 
Supply chain management 
international trade raises multiple issues of interest to 
 
Quality control and efficiency 
Congress, including trade barriers for cross-border data 
flows, international standards, privacy and security 
 
Product or shipment tracing 
concerns, and regulatory implications. In a letter to the 
 
Fraud or tampering detection 
Administration, several Blockchain Caucus Members 
 
Smart contracts (self-executing) 
encouraged building a national blockchain vision even as 
Finance 
some states move forward with their own policies. 
Cross-Border Data Flows 
 
Payments, settlement, and clearance  
Data localization requirements limiting the ability to move 
 
Trade finance letters of credit and insurance 
data across national lines can pose significant barriers for 
 
Real estate title transactions and registries 
the success and growth of blockchain use in international 
 
Royalty payment for creative work distribution 
trade. Cross-border data flows are needed to share and store 
blockchain data with global partners. Mandates to store data 
Regulators 
within a country’s borders or otherwise limit cross-border 
 
Oversight of supply chain  
data flows could limit the application of blockchain.  
 
Customs documentation 
Under Trade Promotion Authority (TPA), Congress 
established a U.S. trade negotiating objective to ensure that 
 
Border enforcement 
nondiscrimination principles apply to cross-border data 
Customs and Border Control 
flows. Obligations in the proposed United States-Mexico-
Canada Agreement (USMCA) enable nondiscriminatory 
Keeping supply chain information together in a blockchain 
data flows, protect encryption, and support development of 
assists with tracking and compliance with regulatory 
privacy regimes. USMCA provisions on a single-access 
reporting requirements. Authorities can review a blockchain 
window system to enable electronic submission and 
record that contains information about ownership, 
transparency procedures support the use of blockchain for 
provenance, authenticity, and price of goods. With the data 
global supply chains. Ongoing WTO negotiations on e-
in the blockchain, regulators can evaluate risk, target, and 
commerce provide a forum for these issues. 
track the flows of goods and/or funds. Electronic 
International Standards  
transmission allows officials to conduct risk assessments in 
U.S. trade policy, and the WTO, have historically promoted 
advance and speed border clearance. Compared to 
the use of international standards to eliminate trade barriers. 
traditional database technologies that rely on a central hub, 
Public and private consortia and alliances aim to promote 
using blockchain could increase speed and security of 
interoperability and limit the use of disparate or local 
gathering and tracking relevant information while 
standards, but current blockchain applications lack global 
decreasing costs and reducing fraud through heightened 
standards or a common protocol. This may especially be a 
transparency.  
concern for SMEs that supply multiple companies, each 
Some see a potential for blockchain to facilitate trade flows, 
operating a separate blockchain. 
enabling companies to more easily send—and regulators to 
TPA negotiating objectives on regulatory practice include 
receive—customs and other documentation as well as 
seeking convergence of standards-setting processes, global 
payment of any fees before a shipment reaches the border. 
standards cooperation, and encouraging the use of 
According to some observers, blockchain can help countries 
international and interoperable standards. The WTO, G-20, 
implement the World Trade Organization (WTO) Trade 
and similar forums present opportunities to establish 
Facilitation Agreement (TFA) that entered into force in 
international guidelines for interoperability and data 
February 2017, including its provisions on transparency; the 
governance structures. Capacity building under TFA could 
use of automated rather than paper-based systems; and the 
help developing countries build policies for the free flow of 
establishment of a single portal for traders to submit 
data to enable blockchain, while safeguarding information. 
documentation and other data requirements. Some port 
Regulatory Oversight 
authorities are testing blockchain for managing cargo flows. 
Congress may conduct oversight or hold hearings on 
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Customs 
regulatory uses of blockchain for increasing the efficiency 
and Border Protection (CBP) is considering several options 
and security of customs and border control, food and 
for applying blockchain, including for international trade 
product safety supply chain traceability, or other 
documentation processing and as an alternative to paper-
applications. Congress may also conduct oversight to 
based official records. One CBP blockchain effort aims to 
review how regulatory agencies are applying existing laws 
protect intellectual property rights and facilitate trade by 
and regulations to blockchain or to study how other 
tracking and authenticating licenses, while another project 
countries are applying and regulating the use of the 
tracks oil through the pipeline to ensure it qualifies for free 
technology. Congress may review existing legislation to 
trade agreement preferences. DHS is also testing ways to 
identify barriers to the technology, such as statutory 
better secure U.S. borders by piloting programs to store 
requirements for paper documentation. 
data from cameras and other sensors using blockchain 
technology to maintain data integrity even if devices 
Rachel F. Fefer, Analyst in International Trade and 
become physically damaged.  
Finance   
IF10810
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Blockchain and International Trade 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10810 · VERSION 4 · UPDATED