
 
Updated March 5, 2019
Cuba: U.S. Policy Overview
Since the early 1960s, when the United States imposed a 
ensures the state sector’s dominance over the economy and 
trade embargo on Cuba, the centerpiece of U.S. policy 
the predominant role of the Communist Party in Cuba’s 
toward Cuba has consisted of economic sanctions aimed at 
political system. 
isolating the Cuban government. In December 2014, 
however, the Obama Administration initiated a major 
Government-to-Government Engagement. With the 
policy shift, moving away from sanctions toward a policy 
restoration of relations in 2015, government-to-government 
of engagement and the normalization of relations. The 
engagement increased significantly. U.S. and Cuban 
policy change included the rescission of Cuba’s designation 
officials have held seven Bilateral Commission meetings, 
as a state sponsor of international terrorism in May 2015; 
the most recent in June 2018, to coordinate efforts to 
the restoration of diplomatic relations in July 2015; and 
advance engagement. Officials have negotiated numerous 
efforts to increase travel, commerce, and the flow of 
bilateral agreements, including on such issues as 
information to Cuba.  
environmental cooperation, direct mail, civil aviation, 
maritime navigation, agriculture, health cooperation, 
President Trump unveiled a new policy toward Cuba in 
counternarcotics cooperation, federal air marshals, cancer 
2017 introducing new sanctions and partially rolling back 
research, seismology, meteorology, wildlife conservation, 
some of the Obama Administration’s efforts to normalize 
animal and plant health, oil-spill preparedness and 
relations. On March 4, 2019, the Administration ratcheted 
response, law enforcement cooperation, search and rescue, 
up its economic pressure on Cuba by allowing some 
and the delimitation of the U.S.-Cuban maritime boundary 
lawsuits to go forward against some 200 Cuba entities 
in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Bilateral dialogues have been 
operated by the Cuban military, intelligence, or security 
held on these and other issues, including counterterrorism, 
services for trafficking in confiscated property.  
U.S. property claims, human rights, renewable energy and 
efficiency, trafficking in persons, migration, and 
Cuban Political Developments. First Vice President 
cybersecurity.  
Miguel Díaz-Canel succeeded Raúl Castro as president in 
April 2018, but Castro continues to head the Cuban 
Travel and Commerce. The Obama Administration’s 
Communist Party until 2021. The selection of Díaz-Canel, 
policy change of increasing travel and commerce with Cuba 
now 58 years old, reflects the generational change in Cuban 
required amendments to U.S. regulations administered by 
leadership that began several years ago and marks the first 
the Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets 
time since the 1959 Cuban revolution that a Castro is not in 
Control (Cuban Assets Control Regulations [CACR]; 31 
charge of the government.  
C.F.R. Part 515) and the Department of Commerce, Bureau 
of Industry and Security (Export Administration 
Raúl Castro (2006-2018) began the implementation of 
Regulations [EAR]; 15 C.F.R. Parts 730-774). To 
significant economic policy changes, moving toward a 
implement the policy, the two agencies issued five rounds 
more mixed economy with a stronger private sector. His 
of amendments to the regulations in 2015-2016 that eased 
government’s slow, gradualist approach, however, did not 
restrictions on travel, remittances, trade, 
produce major improvements to the Cuban economy, which 
telecommunications, and banking and financial services.  
has experienced minimal growth in recent years.  
Trump Administration Sanctions. President Trump 
In December 2018, President Díaz-Canel backtracked on 
issued a national security presidential memorandum on 
implementing regulations that likely would have shrunk the 
Cuba in June 2017 that introduced new sanctions. These 
private sector and slowed implementation of a controversial 
sanctions include restrictions on transactions with 
decree regulating artistic expression, actions that appeared 
companies controlled by the Cuban military and the 
to demonstrate his responsiveness to public criticism and 
elimination of individual people-to-people travel.  
his independence from the previous government. Díaz-
Canel continues to faces two significant challenges—
To implement these policy changes, the Treasury and 
moving forward with economic reforms that produce results 
Commerce Departments amended the CACR and EAR in 
and responding to desires for greater freedom. 
November 2017. The amended regulations require people-
to-people travel to be under the auspices of an organization 
On February 24, 2019, almost 87% of Cubans approved a 
specializing in such travel and prohibit financial 
new constitution in a national referendum. Among the 
transactions with entities controlled by the Cuban military, 
changes are the addition of an appointed prime minister to 
intelligence, or security services, albeit with several 
oversee government operations; age and term limits on the 
exceptions.  
president; and some market-oriented economic reforms, 
including the right to private property and the promotion of  
The State Department issued a list of “restricted entities” in 
foreign investment. However, the new constitution still 
November 2017, which was updated in November 2018. 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Cuba: U.S. Policy Overview 
Currently, the “Cuba Restricted List” includes 205 entities 
occurred from November 2016 to August 2017, but two 
and subentities, including 2 ministries, 5 holding companies 
incidents occurred in May 2018.) The State Department 
(including GAESA) and 43 of their subentities (including 
maintains that the U.S. investigation has not reached a 
the Mariel Special Development Zone), 99 hotels (with 28 
definitive conclusion regarding the cause, source, or any 
in Havana), 2 tourist agencies, 5 marinas, 10 stores in Old 
kind of technologies that might have been used.  
Havana, and 39 entities serving the defense and security 
sectors. 
In September 2017, the State Department ordered the 
departure of nonemergency personnel from the U.S. 
On March 4, 2019, Secretary of State Pompeo, pursuant to 
Embassy to minimize the risk of their exposure to harm; 
Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity 
embassy staff was reduced by about two-thirds. In early 
(LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-114), allowed certain 
October 2017, the State Department ordered the departure 
lawsuits to go forward against those trafficking in 
of 15 diplomats from the Cuban Embassy in Washington, 
confiscated property in Cuba. Since 1996, pursuant to the 
DC. According to then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, the 
provisions of Title III, all Administrations have suspended, 
action was taken because of Cuba’s failure to protect U.S. 
at six-month intervals, the right to file such lawsuits. The 
diplomats in Havana and to ensure equity in the impact on 
next six-month suspension was due by February 1, 2019, 
diplomatic operations. Cuba strongly denies responsibility 
but on January 16, Secretary Pompeo suspended the right to 
for the injuries. The staff reduction at the U.S. Embassy has 
file lawsuits for an additional 45 days, maintaining that the 
affected embassy operations, especially visa processing, 
extension would permit a careful review taking into account 
and has made bilateral engagement more difficult. 
U.S. national interests and efforts to expedite a transition to 
democracy in Cuba. Then, on March 4, Secretary Pompeo 
115th Congress. The 115th Congress continued to provide 
partially suspended the right to file lawsuits for an 
funding for democracy assistance and U.S.-government 
additional 30 days (through April 17) but allowed lawsuits, 
sponsored broadcasting to Cuba. For FY2017, Congress 
beginning March 19, against an entity or subentity on the 
appropriated $20 million in democracy funding and $28.1 
State Department’s “Cuba Restricted List” controlled by the 
million for Cuba broadcasting (P.L. 115-31). For FY2018, 
Cuban military, intelligence, or security services. Lawsuits 
Congress appropriated $20 million for democracy programs 
can be brought by any U.S. national, including those who 
and $28.9 million for Cuba broadcasting (P.L. 115-141; 
were not U.S. nationals at the time of the confiscation. 
explanatory statement to H.R. 1625). The 2018 farm bill, 
However, lawsuits may not be brought against third-country 
P.L. 115-334 (H.R. 2), permits funding for two U.S. 
foreign investors in Cuba.  
agricultural export promotion programs in Cuba, the Market 
Access Program and the Foreign Market Development 
Change in U.S. Immigration Policy. In January 2017, the 
Cooperation Program, marking the first time Congress has 
Obama Administration announced the ending of the so-
eased Cuba sanctions in almost a decade.  
called wet foot/dry foot policy, under which thousands of 
undocumented Cuban migrants have entered the United 
In other action, several measures (P.L. 115-232, P.L. 115-
States in recent years. Cuban nationals who attempt to enter 
244, and P.L. 115-245) extended a prohibition on the use of 
the United States illegally and do not qualify for 
funds in FY2019 to close or relinquish control of the U.S. 
humanitarian relief are now subject to removal. 
Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; the conference 
report to P.L. 115-232 also requires a report on security 
Continued Human Rights Concerns. Human rights 
cooperation between Russia and Cuba. The FAA 
violations in Cuba have remained a fundamental U.S. 
Reauthorization Act of 2018, P.L. 115-254, requires the 
policy concern for many years. When President Obama 
Transportation Security Administration to brief Congress 
announced the Cuba policy shift, he maintained that the 
on certain aspects of Cuban airport security and to develop 
United States would continue to speak out on human rights 
and implement a mechanism to better track public air 
but stressed that more could be done through engagement. 
charter flights between the United States and Cuba. In 
President Trump’s policy also emphasizes human rights but 
2018, the Senate approved S.Res. 224, commemorating the 
links any changes to the bilateral relationship to an end to 
legacy of Cuban democracy activist Oswaldo Payá. 
the Cuban government’s abuse of dissidents.  
116th Congress. For FY2019, Congress appropriated $20 
On October 15, 2018, the U.S. Mission to the United 
million for democracy programs in Cuba and $29.1 million 
Nations launched a campaign to call attention to Cuba’s 
for Cuba broadcasting in the Consolidated Appropriations 
“estimated 130 political prisoners.” In recent years, Cuba 
Act, 2019 (P.L. 116-6, H.J.Res. 31, conference report 
has shifted to using short-term detentions and harassment to 
H.Rept. 116-9).  
repress dissent, with at least 5,155 such detentions in 2017, 
according to the Cuban Commission for Human Rights and 
For additional information, see CRS Report R44822, Cuba: 
National Reconciliation (CCDHRN). In 2018, according to 
U.S. Policy in the 115th Congress; CRS Report RL31139, 
CCDHRN, there were 2,873 short-term detentions, almost a 
Cuba: U.S. Restrictions on Travel and Remittances; and 
45% decline from 2017 and the lowest level since 2010. 
CRS Report R43888, Cuba Sanctions: Legislative 
Restrictions Limiting the Normalization of Relations. 
Injuries of U.S. Embassy Personnel in Havana. 
According to the Department of State, 26 U.S. Embassy 
Mark P. Sullivan, Specialist in Latin American Affairs   
community members suffered a series of unexplained 
injuries, including hearing loss and cognitive issues (most 
IF10045
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Cuba: U.S. Policy Overview 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10045 · VERSION 46 · UPDATED