Legal Sidebari

Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty with the
Russian Federation: A Sketch
July 24, 2018
The recent indictment by Special Counsel Robert Mueller of twelve Russian intelligence officials for
offenses related to interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election raises questions concerning the
Russian Federation’s obligations to cooperate with U.S. prosecutorial efforts. Russian President Vladimir
Putin indicated that assistance could be provided in accordance with the 1999 Treaty on Mutual Legal
Assistance in Criminal Matters between the United States and the Russian Federation (U.S.-Russia
MLAT), which entered into force in 2002. This Legal Sidebar post provides an overview of mutual legal
assistance treaties (MLATs) in general and a sketch of the terms of the U.S.-Russia MLAT in particular.
The United States currently has MLATs with some 70 countries. In general, these agreements provide a
means for acquiring evidence, witnesses, or other assistance in criminal matters from a foreign country,
where domestic courts have no authority to issue subpoenas to foreign nationals, or grant search warrants,
or order other legal processes. Some common types of assistance include serving judicial documents;
locating or identifying persons or things; taking testimony; examining objects and sites; requesting
searches and seizures; obtaining documents or electronic evidence; identifying, tracing, freezing, or
confiscating the proceeds or instrumentalities of crime or other assets; and transferring persons in custody
for testimonial purposes or (in some cases) to face charges. MLATs frequently work in conjunction with
extradition treaties, but the United States does not currently have an extradition treaty with the Russian
Federation. The U.S. Central Authority for MLAT treaties is the U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal
Division, Office of International Affairs. The Department of State office responsible for questions
concerning MLATs is the Office of the Legal Adviser for Law Enforcement and Intelligence (L/LEI).
The U.S.-Russia MLAT is summarized and analyzed in Senate Treaty Doc. 106-22 (see also Ex. Rept.
107-3). In the treaty, the United States and Russia undertake to provide to each other “comprehensive
legal assistance in criminal matters” in accordance with its terms. Legal assistance is to be provided “in
connection with the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes; criminal prosecutions and other
proceedings related to criminal matters.” Specifically, the following forms of assistance are envisioned:
1. obtaining testimony and statements;
2. providing documents, records, and other items [including official records];
3. serving documents;
Congressional Research Service
https://crsreports.congress.gov
LSB10176
CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

---

Congressional Research Service
2
4. locating and identifying persons and items;
5. executing requests for searches and seizures;
6. transferring persons in custody for testimony or other purposes under [the] Treaty;
7. locating and immobilizing assets for purposes of forfeiture, restitution, or collection of
fines; and
8. providing any other legal assistance not prohibited by the laws of the Requested Party.
Legal assistance must be provided (unless an exception applies) with respect to offenses that are
prohibited under the laws of both countries, but each party may agree to provide assistance even where
this is not the case. For the purposes of the indictment mentioned above, the relevant crimes include:
 Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the federal government
 Fraud and related activity in connection with computers
 Aggravated identity theft
 Money laundering
Whether these criminal statutes find analogous prohibitions under Russian law is beyond the scope of this
post.
Two main exceptions apply. Namely, requests for assistance may be denied where:
the request relates to a crime under military law that is not a crime under general criminal law; [or]
the execution of the request would prejudice the security or other essential interests of the Requested
Party.
Requests are not to be denied on account of bank secrecy.
There is no explicit exception for so-called “political offenses,” but the parties consider that the “security
or other essential interests” exception above provides ample coverage to deny requests for assistance
related to what might be considered a political offense.
The U.S.-Russia MLAT spells out the requirements for applying for each type of assistance covered. The
failure to meet such requirements may result in the denial of assistance, but before denying assistance for
any reason, the Requested Party must consult with the Requesting Party to determine whether assistance
can be provided under such conditions as may be deemed appropriate. If the Requested Party considers
that execution of a request will interfere with a criminal investigation or proceeding, it may postpone
execution or impose other conditions as necessary.
The Requested Party must inform the Requesting Party if it is unable to comply with confidentiality
measures that are requested, giving the Requesting Party the opportunity to withdraw the request rather
than expose matters it would prefer to keep confidential. The Requesting Party may also impose
conditions so that assistance it provides is not used for purposes other than those set forth in the request
without its prior consent.
There is a provision for requesting individuals to travel to the Requesting Party’s territory to give
testimony or otherwise participate in a criminal proceeding. A person who volunteers to undertake such
travel may request advance travel costs and is entitled to safe conduct, meaning that the person cannot be
arrested or served process (sued) during the visit and for seven days (extendable to 15 days if necessary)
beyond the time necessary to complete the purpose of the visit, unless the person departs the country and
thereafter voluntarily returns. Persons who are incarcerated may also agree to be transferred for
participation in a criminal proceeding. These persons, however, are to stay in custody while in the
territory of the Requesting State unless other provisions are made, and are to be transferred back to the
Requested State when his or her presence is no longer needed without initiation of the extradition process.

---

Congressional Research Service
3

The Parties are obligated, upon request, to provide assistance locating, immobilizing, and seizing
proceeds and fruits of criminal activities, as well as instrumentalities of crime, for purposes of
forfeiture, restitution to victims of crime, and collection of criminal fines. Such assets are to be
disposed of in accordance with the laws of the Party that has seized or frozen them, and that
Party is required to transfer all or part of such forfeited assets, or the proceeds of their sale, to the
other Party for the purposes mentioned, to the extent it deems it appropriate and under conditions
it deems acceptable.

Author Information

Jennifer K. Elsea

Legislative Attorney





Disclaimer
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff
to congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of
Congress. Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of
information that has been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role.
CRS Reports, as a work of the United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United
States. Any CRS Report may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However,
as a CRS Report may include copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the
permission of the copyright holder if you wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material.

LSB10176 · VERSION 2 · NEW

---