
 
May 22, 2018
Merger and Acquisition Brokers: Overview and Proposals for 
Relief
Introduction 
On the other hand, being a registered M&A broker can be 
Merger and acquisitions (M&A) brokers are also known as 
relatively costly compared to an unregistered broker. There 
Main Street brokers. In general terms, they are 
are estimates that initial SEC registration costs for M&A 
intermediaries who conduct privately negotiated sales of 
brokers can exceed $150,000, with annual registration 
privately held small- and mid-sized companies by 
running as high as $75,000, costs that at least in part can be 
facilitating securities transactions that transfer ownership 
passed on to a broker’s client, potentially increasing  the 
and control of such firms to a buyer who intends to operate 
expense of such corporate sales. 
the firm. 
The 2014 SEC No-Action Letter 
The Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act, P.L. 73-291) is 
In January 2014, in what many observers described as a 
a major federal securities law that authorized the creation of 
major advance over earlier SEC guidance on unregistered 
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and 
M&A brokers and their intermediated transactions, the SEC 
provides for a regulatory regime requiring most brokers and 
staff issued a no-action letter on unregistered broker 
dealers to register with the agency and also become 
liability. (A no-action letter is a response to an individual or 
members of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority 
entity who is uncertain if a certain product, service, or 
(FINRA, the frontline regulator of securities brokerage 
action would violate federal securities law. Such letters 
firms and their brokers overseen by the SEC). The 
express the view that the prospective activity or product 
Exchange Act broadly defines a broker as a firm or 
would not result in adverse agency action.)    
individual who effects transactions in securities on behalf of 
others. Dealers are defined as firms or individuals who 
In the 2014 no-action letter to several attorneys who had 
trade their own securities for profit, called “trading for its 
raised the issue, entitled M&A Brokers, the SEC’s  Division 
own account.”  
of Trading and Markets stated that it would not recommend 
SEC enforcement action in the event that an intermediary 
Historically, there has been some uncertainty over whether 
were to facilitate a securities transaction connected to the 
M&A brokers, many of whom self-identify as finders, meet 
transfer of ownership of a privately held firm. The letter 
the definition of a broker under the Exchange Act. For 
contained a number of stipulations, including (1) the broker 
example, some observers have argued that broker-dealer 
cannot provide financing for the transaction; (2) the broker 
regulations were originally conceived to prevent “high 
cannot provide custody services for funds used in the 
pressure selling tactics” and the “third party custody” of 
transaction or for securities issued or exchanged in 
securities trade-related funds. And they have noted that 
connection with the transaction; (3) the transaction cannot 
neither role appears to be associated with the firm 
involve a public securities offering and is limited to 
acquisitions that M&A brokers routinely manage. 
offerings that are exempt from SEC registration under the 
Securities Act of 1933 (P.L. 73-22); (4) the transaction’s 
By contrast, in a  1985 U.S. Supreme Court case, Landreth 
buyer “must control and actively operate the company or 
Timber Co. v. Landreth, 471 U.S. 681 (1985), the court 
the business conducted with the assets of the company” 
ruled that the sale of all or a controlling interest in a firm 
when the transaction is finalized; (5) the broker can 
constitutes a securities transaction. It found that a person 
facilitate an M&A transaction with a group of buyers only 
involved in facilitating the sale of an operational business 
if the group was initially formed without the broker’s 
could fall within the definition of a broker under the 
assistance; and (6) the broker cannot have been barred or 
Exchange Act. According to some accounts, the ruling led 
suspended by the SEC, a state, or by a self-regulatory 
to greater numbers of unregistered M&A brokers 
organization such as FINRA. 
registering with the SEC under the Exchange Act. Still,  
unregistered M&A brokers reportedly constitute a majority 
Within the M&A broker community, a frequently 
of brokers. 
encountered reaction to the letter was that the letter was a 
“welcome relief as private companies …[were] previously 
Historically, among other things, an unregistered M&A 
concerned about whether they had exposure for M&A 
broker could face the risk of having a client’s corporate sale 
transactions facilitated by unregistered broker-
rescinded if the acquired firm falters under the new owner.  
dealers…[within the letter’s qualifying limits]”  
Some acquirers have reportedly cited a broker’s 
unregistered status to convince the courts to rescind a 
Legislation 
corporate sale.  
Two legislative proposals in the 115th Congress, Section 
401 of H.R. 10 (the Financial CHOICE Act, which passed 
the House on June 7, 2017); and H.R. 477 (which 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Merger and Acquisition Brokers: Overview and Proposals for Relief 
unanimously passed the House on December 7, 2017), are 
Responses to the Legislation 
aimed at “clarifying and simplifying the registration regime 
In March 2017, the International Business Brokers 
for M&A brokers [thus reducing] … the burdens on the 
Association (IBBA), a group of brokers and transaction 
M&A brokers, which in turn will reduce the costs borne by 
intermediaries, wrote to the House Financial Services 
their small business clients that need the services of the 
Committee In support of the current legislation. They 
M&A broker to assist them in with merger or acquisition 
argued that the current “one-size-fits all” broker-dealer 
opportunities.” 
regulatory regime unfairly conflates M&A brokers involved 
in the sale of privately held firms with “Wall Street” 
The current legislation attempts to do so by amending the 
investment bankers who intermediate between public 
Exchange Act so that certain M&A brokers would be 
company issuers and buyers of their shares. The letter also 
exempted from registration as broker-dealers with the SEC. 
argued that the current regulatory regime imposes 
Under the legislation, a registration-exempt M&A broker 
regulatory burdens and costs on M&A brokers that are 
would be defined as an entity who is involved in facilitating 
passed on to the buyers and sellers of the private businesses 
the transfer of ownership of a privately held company with 
whose acquisitions are managed by the brokers. 
annual earnings of less than $25 million or annual revenues 
of less than $250 million.   
The North American Securities Administrators Association 
(NASAA) is an association of state and provincial securities 
Under the legislation, the exemption from registration 
regulators that tends to take an investor protection stance  
would not be granted to M&A brokers who do any of 
on many policy issues. In an October 2017 letter to the 
several things, including the following: 
House Financial Services Committee, the group lent its 
support to the legislation. In addition, it argued that the 
  They provide custody services for funds used in the 
legislation’s federal regulatory exemption is very similar to 
transaction or for securities issued or exchanged in 
the NASAA’s own model state regulation for M&A 
connection with the transaction. 
brokers, which generally exempts M&A brokers from state 
securities registration.  
  They are engaged in a public securities offering on 
behalf of a securities issuer. 
The Americans for Financial Reform (AFR) is a coalition 
that includes consumer advocacy; civil rights, investor, and 
  They cannot provide financing for the transaction. 
retiree advocacy; and labor and faith-based groups. In an 
October 2017 letter to the House Financial Services 
  They are engaged in a transaction involving the transfer 
Committee, the group, which also tends to take a pro-
of ownership of an eligible privately held company to 
investor stance on financial policy issues, argued that the 
passive buyers. (These are defined as buyers who do not 
legislation improved on similar bills in the 114th Congress 
who have an active involvement in the managing of the 
by including the aforementioned disqualifications for “bad 
acquired firm.)  
actors.” The group, however, pointed to the 2014 SEC no-
action letter and argued that the letter effectively made the 
  They are engaged on behalf of any party to a transaction 
legislation unnecessary. 
involving a shell company. (A shell company is defined 
as a company with (1) either no or a nominal level of 
Supporters of the current legislation counter that the no-
operations; (2) either no or a nominal amount of assets; 
action letter, which they say the current legislation is 
(3) assets that consist entirely of cash and cash 
consistent with, merely serves as interpretive guidance that 
equivalents; or (4) assets that consist of any amount of 
the SEC can always rescind. As such, they argue that there 
cash and cash equivalents and nominal amounts of other 
is a need for a more permanent statutory fix via the current 
assets.)  
legislation. Historically, however, very few SEC no-action 
letters appear to have been rescinded. 
  They can facilitate a transaction with a group of buyers 
only if the group was initially formed without the 
In 2015, criticizing legislation in the 114th Congress similar 
broker’s assistance. 
to the current legislation, Theresa A. Gabaldon of the 
George Washington University Law School invoked the 
The current legislation also contains several “bad actor” 
question of M&A broker fairness. She argued that the 
disqualifications, which would disqualify a broker from the 
legislation would allow unregistered brokers to compete 
registration exemptions. One key “bad actor” disqualifier 
with brokers who have put “in the time and effort [and 
would apply if a broker has had their SEC registration 
expense] to register and who are willing to submit to 
suspended or revoked. 
inspection and other controls.” The law professor also 
commented that lost in much of the discussion on the 
The legislation appears to be broadly similar to the SEC’s 
legislation was the notion that registered M&A brokers 
January 2014 no-action letter on M&A brokers, which is 
might actually do a better job of serving the needs of 
discussed above.  
smaller companies than unregistered brokers. 
 
Gary Shorter, Specialist in Financial Economics   
IF10893
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Merger and Acquisition Brokers: Overview and Proposals for Relief 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10893 · VERSION 2 · NEW