
 
Updated October 17, 2017
Workers’ Compensation: Overview and Issues
Introduction 
prohibited from suing their employers and workers’ 
Nearly all workers and employers in the United States are 
compensation is the exclusive remedy for workplace 
covered by workers’ compensation. When a covered worker 
injuries, illnesses, and deaths. Employers are protected from 
is injured, becomes sick, or dies as a result of his or her 
lawsuits but must pay statutorily defined benefits in all 
employment, that worker is entitled to full medical 
cases. Employers can purchase insurance to mitigate their 
coverage for the injury, cash benefits to replace a portion of 
financial risk and increase cost predictability. 
wages lost due to inability to work, and benefits for 
surviving family members in case of death. Employers are 
Workers’ Compensation Benefits 
responsible for providing workers’ compensation benefits 
Workers’ compensation benefits are set by state or federal 
to their workers and generally purchase insurance to cover 
law and thus differ among programs. However, all systems 
these costs. The federal government has only a limited role 
provide for complete medical coverage, at no cost to the 
in the provision of workers’ compensation because most 
worker, for any treatment of covered injuries and illnesses. 
workers are covered by state laws. Although every state has 
Systems differ on the rights of employees to select 
a workers’ compensation system, there is no federal 
treatment providers. Approximately 75% of all workers’ 
mandate that states have workers’ compensation, no federal 
compensation cases involve only medical benefits with no 
standards for state programs, and no oversight of state 
time lost from work due to injury or illness. 
systems.  
In addition, all systems provide for limited wage 
Table 1. Total Workers’ Compensation Costs and 
replacement, usually two-thirds of the pre-injury wage, if an 
Benefits, 2015 
injury or illness prevents an employee from working. For 
certain permanent partial disabilities, such as the loss of a 
Per $100 in 
limb or an eye, a set amount of benefits are paid regardless 
 
Billions of $ 
Covered Payroll 
of ability to work. Survivors benefits are paid to the family 
Total Benefits 
61.9 
0.86 
members of workers who die on the job and most systems 
offer vocational rehabilitation to assist employees’ return to 
 
Medical Benefits 
the workplace. Systems differ in the duration of benefit 
31.1 
0.43 
eligibility with some systems capping lifetime benefits at a 
 
Cash Benefits 
30.7 
0.43 
certain amount or number of months and others paying for 
the duration of disability or life of the worker. 
Employer Costs 
94.8 
1.32 
Source: Christopher F. McLaren and Marjorie L. Baldwin, Workers’ 
Federal Workers’ Compensation 
Compensation: Benefits, Coverage, and Costs (2015 Data), National 
Programs 
Academy of Social Insurance, October 2017, p. 1. 
Each state operates its own workers’ compensation program 
and these state programs cover the majority of employees in 
The Grand Bargain of Workers’ 
the United States. The federal government, through the 
Compensation 
Department of Labor, administers the following workers’ 
Before the first workers’ compensation laws were passed by 
compensation programs: 
Congress in 1908 and the states in 1911, workers were 
required to sue their employers for costs associated with 
  Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA) for 
medical care and lost work due to job-related accidents and 
federal civilian employees; 
illnesses. In addition to the costs of bringing such suits, 
workers had to demonstrate that their employers, and not 
  Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act 
any third parties or the workers themselves, were 
(LHWCA) for private-sector longshore workers, and 
responsible for their injuries. Although employers could 
through extensions of the LHWCA, overseas 
often avoid being held liable for employment-related 
government contractors, non-appropriated fund 
injuries, illnesses, or deaths, employers faced uncertainty in 
instrumentality workers, and workers on the Outer 
what their costs would be if they lost a case and a single 
Continental Shelf; 
case could, depending on the damages awarded by the 
court, have a catastrophic financial impact on an employer.  
  Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 
Program Act (EEOICPA) for former public and private-
Workers’ compensation is often referred to as a “grand 
sector workers in the atomic weapons and related 
bargain” between workers and employers. Under workers’ 
industries; and 
compensation, workers receive benefits for covered 
injuries, illnesses, and deaths without regard to fault or 
  Black Lung Benefits Act for coal miners with coal 
liability. In exchange for this coverage, employees are 
workers’ pneumoconiosis (black lung disease).  
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Workers’ Compensation: Overview and Issues 
In addition, the federal government administers limited 
Issues 
benefit programs for certain other workers, including 
Policymakers have raised the following issues regarding 
former atomic testing workers and September 11th 
federal and state workers’ compensation programs: 
responders.  
  The wide variance in state benefit levels, especially for 
State Insurance Systems 
permanent-partial disability benefits and the concern 
States workers’ compensation laws differ in how employers 
that some states may be engaged in a “race to the 
may provide for benefits. In all states, except Texas which 
bottom” on workers’ compensation; 
allows employers to opt out of coverage, workers’ 
compensation is mandatory for nearly all employers. In four 
  The role of prescription drugs, especially opioid pain 
states, employers must purchase insurance from state-
killers, compounded drugs, and physician-dispensed 
administered funds rather than the open market. In 17 
drugs, in workers’ compensation treatment; 
states, employers may elect to purchase insurance from 
state funds or private insurers. Thirty states do not offer 
  The persistence of litigation in workers’ compensation 
state funds and in all but two states, qualified employers 
systems despite the grand bargain and the role of 
may self-insure for workers’ compensation.  
settlements between insurers and workers in long-term 
cases; 
Past Congressional Involvement in 
Workers’ Compensation 
  The interaction of workers’ compensation with other 
Congress has historically left it up to the states to decide 
public systems, such as Social Security Disability 
whether to have workers’ compensation programs and to 
Insurance (SSDI) and Medicare, including issues related 
regulate the make-up and administration of these programs. 
to employers and insurers shifting costs from workers’ 
In addition to creating federal programs for federal 
compensation to these federal benefit programs;  
employees and other workers, the most significant 
congressional involvement in workers’ compensation came 
  The integration of workers’ compensation into the larger 
in 1970 with the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH 
issue of occupational safety and health; and  
Act). In addition to requiring employers to comply with 
federal worker-safety standards, the OSH Act created a 
  How workers’ compensation systems designed in the 
national commission to study state workers’ compensation 
early 20th century can best provide for workers and 
laws to see if these laws needed reform. The commission 
employers in the changing workplaces of today.  
issued its final report in 1973 and called on states to reduce 
the number and types of workers excluded from coverage 
For Additional Information 
and provide a minimum level of benefits of two-thirds of a 
CRS Report R44580, Workers’ Compensation: Overview 
worker’s pre-disability wage.  
and Issues, by Scott D. Szymendera  
After publication of the national commission’s report, 
CRS Report R42107, The Federal Employees’ 
legislation was introduced in Congress to require states to 
Compensation Act (FECA): Workers’ Compensation for 
comply with minimum standards of workers’ compensation 
Federal Employees, by Scott D. Szymendera 
based on the commission’s recommendations or have the 
federal government take over their workers’ compensation 
Department of Labor, Does the Workers’ Compensation 
systems. This legislation was not enacted into law and 
System Fulfill its Obligations to Injured Workers?, October 
Congress has made no significant attempt since the early 
2016, https://www.dol.gov/asp/
1970s to set minimum standards for state workers’ 
WorkersCompensationSystem/
compensation systems.  
WorkersCompensationSystemReport.pdf 
Congressional Activity 
Christopher F. McLaren and Marjorie L. Baldwin, Workers’ 
Activity in the last few years has focused on proposed 
Compensation: Benefits, Coverage, and Costs (2015 Data), 
changes to FECA designed to reduce program costs and 
National Academy of Social Insurance, October 2017, 
bring benefit levels more in line with state programs. These 
https://www.nasi.org/sites/default/files/research/
changes would, among other things, eliminate augmented 
NASI_Workers%20Comp%20Report%202017.pdf 
compensation, which brings benefits to 75% of a worker’s 
pre-disability wage if there are dependents and adjust 
Workers’ Compensation Research Institute 
benefits at retirement age to encourage federal workers to 
http://www.wcrinet.org/ 
switch from the FECA program to federal retirement 
benefits. In addition, because United States Postal Service 
Scott D. Szymendera, Analyst in Disability Policy   
makes up more than 45% of all FECA cases, Congress has 
framed FECA reforms in the context of larger legislation to 
IF10308
make changes to the Postal Service. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov 
Workers’ Compensation: Overview and Issues 
 
 
 
Disclaimer 
This document was prepared by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). CRS serves as nonpartisan shared staff to 
congressional committees and Members of Congress. It operates solely at the behest of and under the direction of Congress. 
Information in a CRS Report should not be relied upon for purposes other than public understanding of information that has 
been provided by CRS to Members of Congress in connection with CRS’s institutional role. CRS Reports, as a work of the 
United States Government, are not subject to copyright protection in the United States. Any CRS Report may be 
reproduced and distributed in its entirety without permission from CRS. However, as a CRS Report may include 
copyrighted images or material from a third party, you may need to obtain the permission of the copyright holder if you 
wish to copy or otherwise use copyrighted material. 
 
https://crsreports.congress.gov | IF10308 · VERSION 4 · UPDATED