Assistance to Firefighters Program: Distribution of Fire Grant Funding

March 30, 2016 (RL32341)
Jump to Main Text of Report

Contents

Tables

Summary

The Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Program, also known as fire grants or the FIRE Act grant program, was established by Title XVII of the FY2001 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 106-398). Currently administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the program provides federal grants directly to local fire departments and unaffiliated Emergency Medical Services (EMS) organizations to help address a variety of equipment, training, and other firefighter-related and EMS needs. A related program is the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Firefighters (SAFER) program, which provides grants for hiring, recruiting, and retaining firefighters.

The fire grant program is now in its 16th year. The Fire Act statute was reauthorized in 2012 (Title XVIII of P.L. 112-239) and provides new guidelines on how fire grant money should be distributed. There is no set geographical formula for the distribution of fire grants—fire departments throughout the nation apply, and award decisions are made by a peer panel based on the merits of the application and the needs of the community. However, the law does require that fire grants be distributed to a diverse mix of fire departments, with respect to type of department (paid, volunteer, or combination), geographic location, and type of community served (e.g., urban, suburban, or rural).

On December 18, 2015, the President signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-113). The law provided $690 million for firefighter assistance in FY2016, including $345 million for AFG and $345 million for SAFER. For FY2017, the Administration requested $335 million for AFG and $335 million for SAFER, a reduction of $10 million for each program from the FY2016 enacted level.

The 114th Congress is considering FY2017 budget appropriations for AFG and SAFER. As is the case with many federal programs, concerns over the federal budget deficit could impact budget levels for AFG and SAFER. At the same time, firefighter assistance budgets will likely receive heightened scrutiny from the fire community, given the local budgetary cutbacks that many fire departments are facing.

The Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Program, also known as fire grants or the FIRE Act grant program, was established by Title XVII of the FY2001 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 106-398). Currently administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the program provides federal grants directly to local fire departments and unaffiliated Emergency Medical Services (EMS) organizations to help address a variety of equipment, training, and other firefighter-related and EMS needs. A related program is the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response Firefighters (SAFER) program, which provides grants for hiring, recruiting, and retaining firefighters.

The fire grant program is now in its 16th year. The Fire Act statute was reauthorized in 2012 (Title XVIII of P.L. 112-239) and provides new guidelines on how fire grant money should be distributed. There is no set geographical formula for the distribution of fire grants—fire departments throughout the nation apply, and award decisions are made by a peer panel based on the merits of the application and the needs of the community. However, the law does require that fire grants be distributed to a diverse mix of fire departments, with respect to type of department (paid, volunteer, or combination), geographic location, and type of community served (e.g., urban, suburban, or rural).

On December 18, 2015, the President signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-113). The law provided $690 million for firefighter assistance in FY2016, including $345 million for AFG and $345 million for SAFER. For FY2017, the Administration requested $335 million for AFG and $335 million for SAFER, a reduction of $10 million for each program from the FY2016 enacted level.

The 114th Congress is considering FY2017 budget appropriations for AFG and SAFER. As is the case with many federal programs, concerns over the federal budget deficit could impact budget levels for AFG and SAFER. At the same time, firefighter assistance budgets will likely receive heightened scrutiny from the fire community, given the local budgetary cutbacks that many fire departments are facing.


Assistance to Firefighters Program: Distribution of Fire Grant Funding

Background

Firefighting activities are traditionally the responsibility of states and local communities. As such, funding for firefighters is provided mostly by state and local governments. During the 1990s, shortfalls in state and local budgets, coupled with increased responsibilities of local fire departments, led many in the fire community to call for additional financial support from the federal government. Although federally funded training programs existed (and continue to exist) through the National Fire Academy, and although federal money was available to first responders for counterterrorism training and equipment through the Department of Justice, there did not exist a dedicated program, exclusively for firefighters, which provided federal money directly to local fire departments to help address a wide variety of equipment, training, and other firefighter-related needs.

Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program

During the 106th Congress, many in the fire community asserted that local fire departments require and deserve greater support from the federal government. The Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program (AFG), also known as fire grants or the FIRE Act grant program, was established by Title XVII of the FY2001 Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 106-398).1 Currently administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the program provides federal grants directly to local fire departments and unaffiliated Emergency Medical Services (EMS) organizations to help address a variety of equipment, training, and other firefighter-related and EMS needs.

Since its establishment, the Assistance to Firefighters Grant program has been reauthorized twice. The first reauthorization was Title XXXVI of the FY2005 Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 108-375), which authorized the program through FY2009. The second and current reauthorization is Title XVIII, Subtitle A of the FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 112-239), which authorizes the program through FY2017 and modifies program rules for disbursing grant money.

Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012

On January 2, 2013, the President signed P.L. 112-239, the FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act. Title XVIII, Subtitle A is the Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012, which authorizes the fire grant program through FY2017. Table 1 provides a summary of key provisions of the 2012 reauthorization, and provides a comparison with the previous statute.

Table 1. Key Provisions of Fire Grant Reauthorization

Previous Statute
(15 U.S.C. 2229 and 15 U.S.C. 2229a)

Fire Grant Reauthorization Act of 2012
(Title XVIII
of P.L. 112-239)

Grant money allocation

volunteer and combination fire departments shall receive a proportion of the total grant funding that is not less than the proportion of the U.S. population that those departments protect

not less than 25% to career fire departments

not less than 25% to volunteer fire departments

not less than 25% to combination and paid-on-call fire departments

not less than 10% for open competition among career, volunteer, combination, and paid-on-call fire departments

5% (minimum) to fire prevention and safety grants

not less than 10% to fire prevention and safety grants

no fire prevention and safety grant may exceed $1.5 million

includes establishment of fire-safety research centers to conduct research to improve firefighter health and safety

no fire prevention and safety grant may be provided to the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN)

3.5% (minimum) to EMS provided by fire departments and nonaffiliated EMS organizations

2% (maximum) to nonaffiliated EMS organizations

not less than 3.5% to EMS provided by fire departments and nonaffiliated EMS organizations

not more than 2% to nonaffiliated EMS organizations

 

not more than 3% to State training academies, no more than $1 million per state academy in any fiscal year

 

not more than 25% for purchasing vehicles

Grant recipient limits

populations over 1 million—lesser of $2.75 million or 0.5% of total appropriation

populations of 500K to 1 million—$1.75 million

populations under 500K—$1 million

no single grant can exceed 0.5% of total funds appropriated for a single fiscal year

$9 million—over 2.5m population

$6 million—1m to 2.5m population

$3 million—500K to 1m population

$2 million—100K to 500K population

$1 million—under 100K population

DHS can waive the funding limits for populations up to 1 million in instances of extraordinary need; however the lesser of $2.75 million or 0.5% limit cannot be waived

FEMA may not award a grant exceeding 1% of all available grant funds, unless FEMA determines extraordinary need

Nonfederal match requirements

20% for populations over 50,000

10% for populations 20,000 to 50,000

5% for populations less than 20,000

15% for populations over 1 million

10% for populations 20,000 to 1 million

5% for populations under 20,000

No match requirement for non-fire department prevention and firefighter safety grants

5% match required for fire prevention and safety grants

Maintenance of expenditures

requires applicants to maintain expenditures at the same level as the average over the preceding two fiscal years

requires applicants to maintain expenditures at or above 80% of the average over the preceding two fiscal years

Economic hardship waivers

no economic hardship waivers available

waivers available for nonfederal matching and maintenance of expenditures requirements, FEMA will develop economic hardship waiver guidelines considering unemployment rates, percentages of individuals eligible to receive food stamps, and other factors as appropriate.

Authorization levels

FY2005—$900 million

FY2006—$950 million

FY2007—$1 billion

FY2008—$1 billion

FY2009—$1 billion

FY2013—$750 million

for each of FY2014-FY2017, an amount equal to the amount authorized the previous fiscal year, increased by the percentage by which the Consumer Price Index for the previous fiscal year exceeds the preceding year.

Congressionally Directed Spending

no provision

no funds may be used for any congressionally directed spending item (as defined under the rules of the Senate and the House of Representatives)

Sunset

none

the authority to award assistance and grants shall expire five years after the date of enactment

SAFER grants

grant period is 4 years, grantees are required to retain for at least 1 year beyond the termination of their grants those firefighter positions hired under the grant

shortens the grant period to three years, with no requirement that fire departments must retain SAFER funded firefighters for an extra year

year 1—10% local match
year 2—20% local match
year 3—50% local match
year 4—70% local match

year 1—25% local match
year 2—25% local match
year 3—65% local match

total funding over 4 years for hiring a firefighter may not exceed $100K, adjusted annually for inflation

for the first year, the amount of funding provided for hiring a firefighter may not exceed 75% of the usual annual cost of a first-year firefighter in that department at the time the grant application was submitted

for the second year, the amount of funding provided for hiring a firefighter may not exceed 75% of the usual annual cost of a first-year firefighter in that department at the time the grant application was submitted

for the third year, the amount of funding provided for hiring a firefighter may not exceed 35% of the usual annual cost of a first-year firefighter in that department at the time the grant application was submitted

state, local, and Indian tribal governments eligible for recruitment and retention funds

additionally makes national organizations eligible for recruitment and retention funds

 

allows FEMA, in the case of economic hardship, to waive cost share requirements, as well as the prohibition on supplanting local funds and maintenance of expenditure requirements (which would allow grants to be used for retention and rehiring laid-off firefighters)

authorized for 7 years starting at $1 billion in FY2004, ending at $1.194 billion in FY2010

reauthorizes the SAFER grant program at $750 million for FY2013; for each of FY2014-FY2017, an amount equal to the amount authorized the previous fiscal year, increased by the percentage by which the Consumer Price Index for the previous fiscal year exceeds the preceding year

no funds may be used for any congressionally directed spending item (as defined under the rules of the Senate and the House of Representatives)

authority to make grants shall lapse 10 years from November 24, 2003

the authority to award assistance and grants shall expire five years after the date of enactment

Source: Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012, Title VIII, Subtitle A of FY2013 National Defense Authorization Act, P.L. 112-239.

Legislation in the 114th Congress

Not including appropriations bills, the following has been introduced into the 114th Congress:

Appropriations

From FY2001 through FY2003, the Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) Program (as part of USFA/FEMA) received its primary appropriation through the VA-HUD-Independent Agencies Appropriation Act. In FY2004, the Assistance to Firefighters Program began to receive its annual appropriation through the House and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Homeland Security.

The fire grant program is in its 16th year. Table 2 shows the appropriations history for firefighter assistance, including AFG, SAFER, and the Fire Station Construction Grants (SCG) provided in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). Table 3 shows recent and proposed appropriated funding for the AFG and SAFER grant programs.

Table 2. Appropriations for Firefighter Assistance, FY2001-FY2016

AFG

SAFER

SCGa

Total

FY2001

$100 million

 

 

$100 million

FY2002

$360 million

 

 

$360 million

FY2003

$745 million

 

 

$745 million

FY2004

$746 million

 

 

$746 million

FY2005

$650 million

$65 million

 

$715 million

FY2006

$539 million

$109 million

 

$648 million

FY2007

$547 million

$115 million

 

$662 million

FY2008

$560 million

$190 million

 

$750 million

FY2009

$565 million

$210 million

$210 million

$985 million

FY2010

$390 million

$420 million

 

$810 million

FY2011

$405 million

$405 million

 

$810 million

FY2012

$337.5 million

$337.5 million

 

$675 million

FY2013

$321 million

$321 million

 

$642 million

FY2014

$340 million

$340 million

 

$680 million

FY2015

$340 million

$340 million

 

$680 million

FY2016

$345 million

$345 million

 

$690 million

Total

$7.28 billion

$3.19 billion

$210 million

$10.7 billion

a. Assistance to Firefighters Fire Station Construction Grants (SCG) grants were funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (P.L. 111-5).

Table 3. Recent and Proposed Appropriations for Firefighter Assistance

(millions of dollars)

 

FY2014
(P.L. 113-76)

FY2015 (Admin. request)

FY2015 (P.L. 114-4)

FY2016 (Admin. request)

FY2016 (P.L. 114-113)

FY2017 (Admin. request)

FIRE Grants (AFG)

340

335

340

335

345

335

SAFER Grants

340

335

340

335

345

335

Total

680

670

680

670

690

670

FY2015

The Administration's FY2015 budget proposed $670 million for firefighter assistance, including $335 million for AFG and $335 million for SAFER. Funding for management and administration would be drawn from a separate FEMA account (Salaries and Expenses). The Firefighter Assistance Grants would be categorized under First Responder Assistance Programs (FRAP), one of three activities under FEMA's State and Local Programs (SLP) appropriation.

On June 11, 2014, the House Appropriations Committee approved H.R. S. 25344903, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2015. The bill would provide $680 million in firefighter assistance, including $340 million for AFG and $340 million for SAFER. The committee would continue to fund firefighter assistance under its own account, and declined the Administration's request to place firefighter assistance under the State and Local Programs account. In the accompanying report (H.Rept. 113-481) the committee directed FEMA to continue to administer the Fire Grant programs as directed in prior year committee reports and encouraged FEMA to ensure that the formulas used for equipment accurately reflect the current cost of equipment.

On June 26, 2014, the Senate Appropriations Committee approved, its version of the Department of Homeland Security Act, 2015. As did the House Committee, the Senate bill would provide $680 million in firefighter assistance, including $340 million for AFG and $340 million for SAFER. The Senate bill would continue to fund firefighter assistance under its own separate account. In the accompanying report (S.Rept. 113-198), the committee expressed its expectation that funding for rural fire departments should be consistent with the previous five-year funding history and that FEMA will brief the committee if there is an anticipated fluctuation.

The Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2015 (P.L. 114-4) was signed by the President on March 4, 2015, and provided $680 million in firefighter assistance, including $340 million for AFG and $340 million for SAFER.

FY2016

The Administration's FY2016 budget proposed $670 million for firefighter assistance, including $335 million for AFG and $335 million for SAFER. Funding for management and administration would be drawn from a separate FEMA account (Salaries and Expenses). The Firefighter Assistance Grants would be categorized under First Responder Assistance Programs (FRAP), which is part of FEMA's State and Local Programs (SLP) appropriation.

On June 18, 2015, the Senate Appropriations Committee reported S. 1619, the Department of Homeland Security Act, 2016. Identical to the funding level in FY2015, the Senate bill would provide $680 million in firefighter assistance, including $340 million for AFG and $340 million for SAFER. The Senate bill would continue to fund firefighter assistance under its own separate account. In the accompanying report (S.Rept. 114-68), the committee directed DHS to continue the present practice of funding applications according to local priorities and those established by the USFA, and to continue direct funding to fire departments and the peer review process. The committee stated its expectation that funding for rural fire departments remain consistent with their previous five-year history, and directed FEMA to brief the committee if there is a fluctuation.

On July 21, 2015, the House Appropriations Committee approved H.R. 3128, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2016. The bill would provide $680 million in firefighter assistance, including $340 million for AFG and $340 million for SAFER. In the committee report (H.Rept. 114-215), the committee emphasizes the need for local first responders to be adequately prepared for crude- and ethanol-by-rail incidents and encourages FEMA to categorize AFG hazmat and other applications related to crude- and ethanol-by-rail preparation and response as "high priority."

On December 18, 2015, the President signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-113). The law provided $690 million for firefighter assistance in FY2016, including $345 million for AFG and $345 million for SAFER. Firefighter assistance continued to be funded under its own separate appropriations account.

FY2017

For FY2017, the Administration requested $335 million for AFG and $335 million for SAFER, a reduction of $10 million for each program from the FY2016 enacted level. The budget justification states that the proposed reduction in AFG and SAFER "reflects FEMA's successful investments in prior year grants awarded."

Under the proposed budget, the AFG and SAFER grant accounts would be transferred to the Preparedness and Protection activity under FEMA's broader "Federal Assistance" account. According to the budget request, Federal Assistance programs will "assist Federal agencies, States, Local, Tribal, and Territorial jurisdictions to mitigate, prepare for and recover from terrorism and natural disasters."

Fire Station Construction Grants in the ARRA

Since its inception, the traditional fire grant program has provided money specifically for health- and safety-related modifications of fire stations, but has not funded major upgrades, renovations, or construction. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 (P.L. 111-5) provided an additional $210 million in firefighter assistance grants for modifying, upgrading, or constructing state and local nonfederal fire stations, provided that 5% be set aside for program administration, and provided that no grant shall exceed $15 million. The conference report (H.Rept. 111-16) cited DHS estimates that this spending would create 2,000 jobs. The ARRA also included a provision (§603) that waived the matching requirement for SAFER grants funded by appropriations in FY2009 and FY2010.

The application period for ARRA Assistance to Firefighters Fire Station Construction Grants (SCG) opened on June 11 and closed on July 10, 2009. There is no cost share requirement for SCG grants. Eligible applicants are nonfederal fire departments that provide fire protection services to local communities. Ineligible applicants include federal fire departments, EMS or rescue organizations, airport fire departments, for-profit fire departments, fire training centers, emergency communications centers, auxiliaries and fire service organizations or associations, and search and rescue teams or similar organizations without fire suppression responsibilities.

DHS/FEMA received 6,025 SCG applications for $9.9 billion in federal funds.2 As of October 1, 2010, 119 SCG grants were awarded, totaling $207.461 million to fire departments within the United States. A complete list of SCG awards is available at http://www.fema.gov/rules-tools/assistance-firefighters-station-construction-grants.

SAFER Grants

In response to concerns over the adequacy of firefighter staffing, the 108th Congress enacted the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Act as Section 1057 of the FY2004 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 108-136; signed into law November 24, 2003). The SAFER grant program is codified as Section 34 of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229a). The SAFER Act authorizes grants to career, volunteer, and combination fire departments for the purpose of increasing the number of firefighters to help communities meet industry minimum standards and attain 24-hour staffing to provide adequate protection from fire and fire-related hazards. Also authorized are grants to volunteer fire departments for activities related to the recruitment and retention of volunteers. For more information on the SAFER program, see CRS Report RL33375, Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response: The SAFER Grant Program, by [author name scrubbed].

Program Evaluation

On May 13, 2003, the U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) released the first independent evaluation of the Assistance to Firefighters Program. Conducted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Leadership Development Academy Executive Potential Program, the survey study presented a number of recommendations and concluded overall that the program was "highly effective in improving the readiness and capabilities of firefighters across the nation."3 Another evaluation of the fire grant program was released by the DHS Office of Inspector General in September 2003. The report concluded that the program "succeeded in achieving a balanced distribution of funding through a competitive grant process,"4 and made a number of specific recommendations for improving the program.

At the request of DHS, the National Academy of Public Administration conducted a study to help identify potential new strategic directions for the Assistance to Firefighters Grant program and to provide advice on how to effectively plan, manage, and measure program accomplishments. Released in April 2007, the report recommended consideration of new strategic directions related to national preparedness, prevention vs. response, social equity, regional cooperation, and emergency medical response. According to the report, the "challenge for the AFG program will be to support a gradual shift in direction without losing major strengths of its current management approach—including industry driven priority setting and its well-respected peer review process."5

The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-161), in the accompanying Joint Explanatory Statement, directed the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to review the application and award process for fire and SAFER grants. Additionally, FEMA was directed to peer review grant applications that best address the program's priorities and criteria as established by FEMA and the fire service. Those criteria necessary for peer-review must be included in the grant application package. Applicants whose grant applications are not reviewed must receive an official notification detailing why the application did not meet the criteria for review. Applications must be rank-ordered, and funded following the rank order.

In October 2009, GAO sent a report to Congress finding that FEMA has met most statutory requirements for awarding fire grants.6 GAO recommended that FEMA establish a procedure to track EMS awards, ensure that grant priorities are better aligned with application questions and scoring values, and provide specific feedback to rejected applicants.

In June 2011, the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) released its Third Needs Assessment of the U.S. Fire Service, which seeks to identify gaps and needs in the fire service, and measures the impact that fire grants have had on filling those gaps and needs. According to the study:

Needs have declined to a considerable degree in a number of areas, particularly personal protective and firefighting equipment, two types of resource that received the largest shares of funding from the Assistance to Firefighters grants (AFG). Declines in needs have been more modest in some other important areas, such as training, which have received much smaller shares of AFG grant funds.7

Reports Mandated by Fire Grants Reauthorization Act of 2012

P.L. 112-239 mandates reports and studies on the AFG and SAFER programs, as well as on the state of the fire service.

Distribution of Fire Grants

The AFG statute prescribes different purposes for which fire grant money may be used. These are training firefighting personnel; creating rapid intervention teams; certifying fire inspectors and building inspectors whose responsibilities include fire safety inspections and who are associated with a fire department; establishing wellness and fitness programs, including mental health programs; funding emergency medical services (EMS) provided by fire departments and nonaffiliated EMS organizations; acquiring firefighting vehicles; acquiring firefighting equipment; acquiring personal protective equipment; modifying fire stations, fire training facilities, and other facilities for health and safety; educating the public about arson prevention and detection; providing incentives for the recruitment and retention of volunteer firefighters; and supporting other activities as FEMA determines appropriate. FEMA has the discretion to decide which of those purposes will be funded for a given grant year. Since the program commenced in FY2001, the majority of fire grant funding has been used by fire departments to purchase firefighting equipment, personal protective equipment, and firefighting vehicles.

Eligible applicants are limited primarily to fire departments (defined as an agency or organization that has a formally recognized arrangement with a state, local, or tribal authority to provide fire suppression, fire prevention, and rescue services to a population within a fixed geographical area). Emergency Medical Services (EMS) activities are eligible for fire grants, including a limited number to EMS organizations not affiliated with hospitals.

Additionally, a separate competition is held for fire prevention and firefighter safety research and development grants, which are available to fire departments; national, state, local, tribal, or nonprofit organizations recognized for their fire safety or prevention expertise; and to institutions of higher education, national fire service organizations, or national fire safety organizations to establish and operate fire safety research centers. For official program and application guidelines, frequently-asked-questions, the latest awards announcements, and other information, see the Assistance to Firefighters Grant program web page at http://www.fema.gov/welcome-assistance-firefighters-grant-program.

The FIRE Act statute provides overall guidelines on how fire grant money will be distributed. Previously, the law directed that volunteer and combination departments receive a proportion of the total grant funding that is not less than the proportion of the U.S. population that those departments protect (34% for combination, 21% for all-volunteer). Reflecting concerns that career fire departments (which are primarily in urban and suburban areas) were not receiving adequate levels of funding, the Fire Grants Authorization Act of 2012 alters the distribution formula, directing that not less than 25% of annual AFG funding go to career fire departments, not less than 25% to volunteer fire departments, not less than 25% to combination and paid-on-call fire departments, and not less than 10% for open competition among career, volunteer, combination, and paid-on-call fire departments. Additionally, P.L. 112-239 raises award caps (up to $9 million) and lowers matching requirements for fire departments serving higher population areas.

There is no set geographical formula for the distribution of fire grants—fire departments throughout the nation apply, and award decisions are made by a peer panel based on the merits of the application and the needs of the community. However, the law does require that fire grants should be distributed to a diverse mix of fire departments, with respect to type of department (paid, volunteer, or combination), geographic location, and type of community served (e.g., urban, suburban, or rural).8 The Fire Act's implementing regulation provides that

In a few cases, to fulfill our obligations under the law to make grants to a variety of departments, we may also make funding decisions using rank order as the preliminary basis, and then analyze the type of fire department (paid, volunteer, or combination fire departments), the size and character of the community it serves (urban, suburban, or rural), and/or the geographic location of the fire department. In these instances where we are making decisions based on geographic location, we will use States as the basic geographic unit.9

Additionally, each fire department that applies is classified as either urban, suburban, or rural. In FY2010, 75.1% of applications were received from rural fire departments, 17.7% from suburban, and 7.2% from urban. This translated into rural departments requesting 66.7% of federal funds, suburban departments requesting 21.5%, and urban departments requesting 11.8%.10

Finally, in an effort to maximize the diversity of awardees, the geographic location of an applicant (using states as the basic geographic unit) is used as a deciding factor in cases where applicants have similar qualifications. Table 4 shows a state-by-state breakdown of fire grant funding for FY2001 through FY2014, while Table 5 shows a state-by-state breakdown of SAFER grant funding for FY2005 through FY2014. Table 6 provides an in-depth look at the FY2010 fire grants, showing, for each state, the number of fire grant applications, the total amount requested, the total amount awarded, and the amount of funds awarded as a percentage of funds requested. As Table 6 shows, the entire pool of fire department applicants received about 13% of the funds they requested in FY2010. This compares to 16% in FY2009, 15% in FY2008, 16% in FY2007, 21% in FY2006, 22% in FY2005, 28% in FY2004, and 34% in FY2003. The downward trend reflects the fact that the number of applications and the amount of federal funds requested have trended upward over the years, while appropriations for the fire grant program have typically declined over the same period.

Issues in the 114th Congress

The 114th Congress is considering FY2017 budget appropriations for AFG and SAFER. As is the case with many federal programs, concerns over the federal budget deficit could impact budget levels for AFG and SAFER. At the same time, firefighter assistance budgets will likely receive heightened scrutiny from the fire community, given the local budgetary cutbacks that many fire departments are now facing.

Another issue is the proposed transfer of AFG and SAFER into FEMA's Federal Assistance account in FY2017. Fire service groups oppose this transfer, arguing that it could reorient firefighter assistance programs towards responding to terrorism and other major incidents rather than maintaining its current all-hazards focus.

The 114th Congress will also likely examine the impact of new grant distribution guidelines mandated by P.L. 112-239, the Fire Grant Authorization Act of 2012. The continuing issue is how effectively grants are being distributed and used to protect the health and safety of the public and firefighting personnel against fire and fire-related hazards.

Table 4. State-by-State Distribution of AFG Grants, FY2001-FY2014

(millions of dollars)

 

FY01-FY05

FY06-FY10

FY11

FY12

FY13

FY14

Total

AL

84.85

99.819

18.591

11.943

16.104

14.215

245.522

AK

14.819

5.701

0.568

1.375

0.807

0.759

24.029

AZ

30.173

22.002

4.952

3.781

4.562

4.712

70.182

AR

40.729

35.89

4.253

4.009

2.86

3.365

91.106

CA

110.367

108.192

35.334

21.467

20.481

15.599

311.44

CO

22.797

19.924

5.213

2.175

2.137

3.731

55.977

CT

34.622

27.431

3.67

4.085

4.093

3.487

77.388

DE

4.516

3.389

0.366

0.199

0.345

2.742

11.557

DC

0.673

1.915

1.38

0

0

0

3.968

FL

63.26

46.951

16.2

9.782

6.687

11.529

154.409

GA

44.27

41.087

5.174

5.849

2.829

5.983

105.192

HI

4.198

2.342

1.534

0.433

2.685

0.906

12.098

ID

19.173

14.94

0.439

2.069

2.602

2.108

41.331

IL

97.296

104.417

12.753

12.508

8.46

9.717

245.151

IN

66.323

67.308

7.728

4.696

3.247

5.051

154.353

IA

54.221

44.752

6.629

2.978

4.214

3.283

116.077

KS

34.497

24.151

3.072

2.947

2.121

2.297

69.085

KY

60.308

64.731

5.426

4.686

5.48

7.104

147.735

LA

48.407

31.928

6.337

3.369

3.918

3.455

97.414

ME

32.093

21.902

2.118

1.296

1.866

3.622

62.897

MD

31.97

33.371

4.524

6.848

6.737

5.938

89.388

MA

53.889

50.173

10.679

9.365

9.336

9.609

143.051

MI

64.103

74.226

16.904

12.714

9.606

9.206

186.759

MN

61.295

80.576

10.638

5.398

4.959

6.726

169.592

MS

45.382

37.794

3.694

2.617

2.272

4.674

96.433

MO

64.946

57.585

7.594

4.79

7.097

6.272

148.284

MT

27.178

26.222

0.725

1.44

0.569

1.419

57.553

NE

22.939

17.948

1.378

0.674

2.579

0.988

46.506

NV

8.391

5.366

0.564

0.459

1.526

1.575

17.881

NH

17.322

13.579

1.69

1.209

3.403

2.082

39.285

NJ

60.096

64.042

10.402

8.569

5.197

8.658

156.964

NM

15.878

7.166

2.122

1.796

0.975

0.355

28.292

NY

124.065

123.274

10.253

14.595

13.735

17.715

303.637

NC

76.727

90.818

13.864

13.583

8.157

12.903

216.052

ND

14.328

12.977

0.71

0.316

0.653

0.947

29.931

OH

99.921

132.083

23.281

20.617

17.512

20.346

313.76

OK

36.493

35.713

3.187

2.142

2.367

1.921

81.823

OR

36.52

35.987

5.59

2.693

2.47

3.275

86.535

PA

152.17

182.764

26.227

21.358

19.697

26.727

428.943

RI

8.287

8.268

2.314

3.75

3.284

4.082

29.985

SC

43.337

49.449

4.948

6.774

4.303

7.635

116.446

SD

17.911

10.812

1.135

0.292

0.682

0.458

31.29

TN

67.008

64.808

6.268

5.37

5.312

7.336

156.102

TX

102.203

85.594

11.031

7.887

2.766

6.525

216.006

UT

14.35

11.805

0.883

0.987

1.584

11.732

41.341

VT

14.403

6.985

0.498

0.775

0.599

0.718

23.978

VA

57.697

39.486

3.5

5.763

1.985

5.466

113.897

WA

63.215

60.176

7.341

8.01

7.327

10.941

157.01

WV

34.251

30.645

2.173

2.232

1.981

6.646

77.928

WI

65.182

73.388

8.635

9.344

3.436

3.72

163.705

WY

10.052

5.378

0.488

0.179

0.429

0.225

16.751

PR

4.926

1.775

0.876

0.024

0

0.26

7.861

MP

0.59

0.172

0

0

0

0

0.762

GU

0.016

0.287

0

0.422

0

0

0.725

AS

0.448

0

0

0

0

0

0.448

VI

1.285

0.233

0

0

0

0

1.518

 

2386.366

2319.697

345.85

282.64

248.033

300.208

5882.796

Source: Department of Homeland Security.

Table 5. State-by-State Distribution of SAFER Grants, FY2005-FY2014

(millions of dollars)

 

FY05-FY07

FY08-FY10

FY11

FY12

FY13

FY14

Total

AL

12.062

20.133

1.293

6.923

3.73

3.895

68.169

AK

1.674

7.838

0.074

0.951

0.066

0.738

19.179

AZ

9.547

23.738

2.809

7.895

14.135

11.379

93.241

AR

2.591

7.016

1.136

1.019

0.208

2.632

21.618

CA

14.692

98.843

56.356

49.992

50.12

35.522

404.368

CO

6.793

6.359

5.432

1.636

0.85

4.106

31.535

CT

1.177

7.446

5.099

4.474

5.278

0

30.92

DE

0.135

2.121

0

0.946

0

0

5.323

DC

0

0

0

3.468

0

5.675

9.143

FL

22.122

59.011

30.494

26.243

37.927

22.83

257.638

GA

10.281

32.666

1.273

4.606

3.076

3.944

88.512

HI

0

1.726

0

0

0.944

0

4.396

ID

1.31

5.007

4.068

1.323

0

0

16.715

IL

15.736

19.194

2.456

5.704

4.806

4.843

71.933

IN

2.786

22.803

4.587

6.777

5.735

8.595

74.086

IA

1.293

2.414

1.604

0.08

1.104

0.498

9.407

KS

1.741

6.963

0.381

1.991

0.833

0

18.872

KY

3.471

3.697

0.155

1.164

2.574

0.973

15.731

LA

11.236

19.317

1.672

3.509

1.724

1.326

58.101

ME

0.397

2.737

0.518

1.183

1.442

0

9.014

MD

3.484

9.745

4.299

2.488

6.154

14.304

50.219

MA

7.751

55.497

23.127

4.955

17.336

25.612

189.775

MI

2.351

36.407

47.646

25.161

33.87

14.374

196.216

MN

1.764

5.291

4.463

0.797

0.871

1.026

19.503

MS

1.465

2.817

0.488

0.093

0.088

1.613

9.381

MO

9.565

9.473

10.619

2.86

1.284

2.196

45.47

MT

2.924

4.386

1.252

1.046

0

0.737

14.731

NE

1.505

3.246

0

0.37

3.779

0

12.146

NV

3.846

3.122

13.438

2.702

6.564

3.654

36.448

NH

2.963

0.578

1.479

0.976

0.651

0.666

7.891

NJ

13.298

61.593

18.073

34.462

23.791

55.874

268.684

NM

4.432

2.461

0

0

1.357

0.586

11.297

NY

7.376

30.878

6.142

8.949

2.149

8.164

94.536

NC

13.059

26.814

5.833

2.472

4.502

5.703

85.197

ND

0.609

5.174

0.048

0.066

0

0

11.071

OH

5.455

54.383

18.654

18.266

15.748

14.564

181.453

OK

1.377

11.909

1.435

0.676

0.83

1.091

29.227

OR

6.5

8.914

8.354

4.437

11.402

6.418

54.939

PA

5.352

12.617

13.831

27.608

4.462

27.122

103.609

RI

0.505

5.81

3.108

8.716

0

0.544

24.493

SC

4.537

12.632

2.147

4.757

6.763

1.869

45.337

SD

0.585

1.2

0.255

0

0.272

0.58

4.092

TN

9.102

10.378

0.993

3.034

3.58

1.97

39.435

TX

20.691

34.868

2.881

5.225

5.401

11.715

115.649

UT

6.31

10.362

0.208

0.598

0

0

27.84

VT

1.253

0.119

0

0

0

0

1.491

VA

6.427

15.735

4.978

9.883

7.691

12.48

72.929

WA

12.535

26.102

16.139

13.293

8.511

9.763

112.445

WV

0.868

0.845

0

0.46

0.311

1.921

5.25

WI

1.295

4.622

3.101

2.205

0

1.087

16.932

WY

0.316

3.589

1.148

0

0.24

0

8.882

PR

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

MP

0

1.404

0

0

0

0

2.808

MH

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

GU

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

AS

0

0

0.474

0

0

0

0.474

VI

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PW

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

280.163

822.055

334.03

316.439

304.238

332.595

2389.51

Source: Department of Homeland Security.

Table 6. Requests and Awards for AFG Funding, FY2010

State

Number of applications

Federal funds requested ($millions)

Federal funds awarded ($millions)

Funds awarded as a % of funds requested

Alabama

674

96.316

14.591

15.15%

Alaska

45

9.954

0.568

5.71%

Arizona

126

27.556

2.873

10.43%

Arkansas

300

44.642

5.111

11.45%

California

455

105.692

21.764

20.59%

Colorado

162

30.098

3.369

11.19%

Connecticut

201

37.739

3.166

8.39%

Delaware

21

3.569

0.282

7.90%

District of Columbia

2

0.447

0.368

82.33%

Florida

253

55.369

12.557

22.68%

Georgia

298

49.05

6.192

12.62%

Hawaii

2

0.534

0.261

48.88%

Idaho

94

14.085

2.361

16.76%

Illinois

679

116.024

14.809

12.76%

Indiana

386

58.256

10.759

18.47%

Iowa

369

45.45

5.818

12.80%

Kansas

203

27.591

3.055

11.07%

Kentucky

451

72.725

8.081

11.11%

Louisiana

197

33.435

4.414

13.20%

Maine

192

24.753

1.348

5.45%

Maryland

162

28.625

4.545

15.88%

Massachusetts

301

57.184

8.083

14.14%

Michigan

551

84.256

9.502

11.28%

Minnesota

419

69.131

18.923

27.37%

Mississippi

335

44.81

5.66

12.63%

Missouri

428

53.502

9.21

17.21%

Montana

141

21.442

3.204

14.94%

Nebraska

133

17.792

0.441

2.48%

Nevada

25

5.142

1.437

27.95%

New Hampshire

110

16.886

1.496

8.86%

New Jersey

484

87.821

9.687

11.03%

New Mexico

63

11.924

1.632

13.69%

New York

975

136.33

13.367

9.80%

North Carolina

645

102.416

13.137

12.83%

North Dakota

91

13.401

1.594

11.89%

Ohio

950

156.989

20.168

12.85%

Oklahoma

241

31.97

3.527

11.03%

Oregon

171

30.766

6.332

20.58%

Pennsylvania

1641

229.005

19.623

8.57%

Rhode Island

57

14.264

1.533

10.75%

South Carolina

378

50.393

8.684

17.23%

South Dakota

117

16.182

0.753

4.65%

Tennessee

517

78.254

11.259

14.39%

Texas

593

94.696

9.941

10.50%

Utah

93

16.076

2.985

18.57%

Vermont

84

11.737

0.689

5.87%

Virginia

237

43.841

5.991

13.67%

Washington

275

46.474

7.961

17.13%

West Virginia

273

44.61

5.074

11.37%

Wisconsin

584

80.314

9.569

11.91%

Wyoming

35

3.623

0.086

2.37%

Puerto Rico

8

1.499

0

0.00%

Northern Marianas

1

0.56

0

0.00%

Virgin Islands

2

0.355

0

0.00%

Guam

1

0.224

0

0.00%

Total

16,231

2555.779

337.840

13.22%

Source: Department of Homeland Security.

Author Contact Information

[author name scrubbed], Specialist in Science and Technology Policy ([email address scrubbed], [phone number scrubbed])

Footnotes

1.

"Firefighter assistance" is codified as §33 of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2229).

2.

Detailed SCG application statistics are available at http://www.firegrantsupport.com/docs/2009AFSCGAppStats.pdf.

3.

For full report see http://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/affgp-fy01-usda-report.pdf.

4.

Department of Homeland Security, Office of Inspections, Evaluations, and Special Reviews, "A Review of the Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program," OIG-ISP-01-03, September 2003, p. 3. Available at http://www.dhs.gov/xoig/assets/mgmtrpts/OIG_Review_Fire_Assist.pdf.

5.

National Academy of Public Administration, Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program: Assessing Performance, April 2007, p. xvii. Available at http://www.napawash.org/pc_management_studies/Fire_Grants_Report_April2007.pdf.

6.

U.S. Government Accountability Office, Fire Grants: FEMA Has Met Most Requirements for Awarding Fire Grants, but Additional Actions Would Improve Its Grant Process, GAO-10-64, October 2009, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d1064.pdf.

7.

National Fire Protection Association, Third Needs Assessment of the U.S. Fire Service, June 2011, abstract. Available at http://www.nfpa.org/assets/files//2011NeedsAssessment.pdf.

8.

15 U.S.C. 2229(b)(9).

9.

44 C.F.R. Part 152.6(c).

10.

FEMA, FY2010 Assistance to Firefighter Grant Application Statistics, available at http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/26138?fromSearch=fromsearch&id=5744.