




 
July 21, 2015
U.S. Agency for International Development: An Overview
Background 
Figure 1. USAID-Implemented Program Funding by 
Region: FY2013 
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) 
is the leading international humanitarian and development 
Latin 
Asia/
arm of the United States government. Its programs also 
America, 
Pacific, 
support the political and strategic aims of the United States 
7.4%
8.0%
by providing assistance to strategically important and 
conflict countries, and assist U.S. commercial interests by 
Africa, 
furthering the economic growth of developing countries and 
39.2%
building these countries’ capacity to participate in world 
trade. 
MENA, 
23.5%
In FY2015, USAID is responsible for more than $20 billion 
in appropriations, representing more than one-third of the 
International Affairs 150 budget function and more than 
half of total foreign assistance encompassed by the State, 
Foreign Operations Appropriations (SFOPS) and 
Af/Pak, 
Europe/ 
international food aid appropriated under the Agriculture 
19.2%
Eurasia, 
Appropriations. USAID’s annual appropriations come from 
2.7%
 
13 different budget accounts—most “solely-owned” and 
Source: USAID U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants 
some shared with the Department of State and other 
(https://eads.usaid.gov/gbk/) and CRS calculations. 
agencies, making any calculation of its current budget 
Note: Af/Pak = Afghanistan/Pakistan; MENA = Middle East and 
somewhat imprecise. 
North Africa. 
We partner to end extreme poverty and to promote 
Of funds attributable to a specific sector (Figure 2), 36% 
resilient, democratic societies while advancing our security 
went for health programs and 19% for humanitarian efforts. 
and prosperity.  USAID Mission Statement 
Since the early 1990s, health programs have consistently 
been the largest USAID assistance sector, bolstered since 
2004 by billions of dollars in transfers from the Department 
USAID maintains more than 60 country and regional 
of State’s President’s Emergency Program for AIDS Relief 
missions that design and manage a wide range of 
(PEPFAR).  Humanitarian aid, too, has increased 
development projects, most intended to meet specific 
significantly in recent years, particularly in response to the 
development objectives as formulated in a Country 
2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami, the 2010 Haiti 
Development Cooperation Strategy. Most projects are 
earthquake, and the 2014 Ebola epidemic. 
implemented through some form of grant, cooperative 
agreement, or contract by one of thousands of potential 
Figure 2. USAID-Implemented Program Funding by 
development partners—such as U.S. nonprofit private 
Sector: FY2013 
voluntary organizations and other non-governmental 
organizations (NGOs), U.S. for-profit contractors, 
Education 
universities, international organizations, and foreign partner 
4%
governments, civil society, and the private sector. 
Health 36%
Agriculture 
USAID currently provides assistance to over 100 countries, 
6%
including 78 of the 84 low and lower-middle income 
countries. Foreign aid allocations reflect both recipient 
needs and U.S. foreign policy priorities. Suggestive of the 
Democracy 
strong foreign policy purpose behind many USAID 
13%
Humanitarian 
activities, the top 10 recipients of USAID-implemented 
19%
funds in FY2013 were Afghanistan, West Bank/Gaza, 
Jordan, Pakistan, Syria (for refugees), Ethiopia, Kenya, 
Environment 
Other  Economic 
South Sudan, Nigeria, and Egypt. In FY2013, nearly 40% 
3%
7%
Growth 
of funds attributable to countries and regions went to sub-
11%
Saharan Africa and more than 19% went to Afghanistan 
 
and Pakistan (Figure 1).   
Source: USAID, U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants 
(https://eads.usaid.gov/gbk/) and CRS calculations. 
www.crs.gov  |  7-5700 
U.S. Agency for International Development: An Overview 
USAID Forward 
to build “country ownership”  for development objectives.  
Another is more resource mobilization efforts—projects to 
Since 2010, under its USAID Forward agenda, the agency 
develop a government’s capacity to collect revenue to 
has undertaken numerous reforms.  Among these: 
support development. A clear path to sustainability remains 
• 
a work in progress. 
Local Solutions. In order to help ensure that USAID 
objectives are maintained after its project efforts end, 
Human Resources. Despite increased number of USAID 
i.e., are made more sustainable, USAID has focused 
Foreign Service Officers in recent years, the agency still 
increasing amounts of funding on working with local 
faces shortages of specific skill sets—for example, contract 
governments, civil society, and the private sector to 
officers and program officers to meet the needs generated 
implement development programs and develop local 
by the on-going effort to work more closely with local 
capacities. Excluding Afghanistan and Pakistan, 15.1% 
government and private sector partners, and agricultural 
of program funding went through local entities in 
specialists to develop and implement Food Security 
FY2014. 
Initiative projects.  Staff retention, especially of foreign 
•  Evaluation. To improve its learning process, USAID 
nationals, lack of language and skill training, and a lack of 
has required more evaluations and has established 
travel funds to monitor projects are continuing human 
improved indicators by which it can measure project 
resource concerns. 
progress. 
• 
Program Flexibility. Congressional funding mandates, 
Science, Technology, and Innovation. To invigorate 
specifying amounts for health, biodiversity, and other 
its historic leadership in applying science and 
sectors, account for as much as two-thirds of USAID’s 
technology to development problems, USAID 
annual program budget. These, plus a host of presidential 
established a Global Development Lab and multiple 
initiatives, are viewed by many observers as restricting the 
programs seeking solutions from scientists, universities, 
ability of USAID mission personnel to program project 
and the broader public for a range of development 
activities in accordance with development professional and 
challenges. 
partner country priorities. Some critics believe that many 
•  Private Sector Funding. Building on existing efforts to 
legislative conditions further stymie flexibility—most food 
leverage contributions to development from private 
aid, for example, must be provided in the form of U.S. 
resources, USAID has expanded public-private 
produce and shipped on expensive U.S. freighters instead of 
partnerships and increased use of its Development 
purchased with cash locally near a food emergency site. 
Credit Authority.   
• 
Scaling-Up.  Innovations in science, technology, and 
Policy and Budget Capacity. To restore capacities lost 
development practice are usually tested with pilot programs 
to the State Department in a 2006 reorganization, 
in one province in one country. Seeing successful ideas 
USAID re-established offices of policy and budget.  
from pilot through to maturity and making them work at the 
country, region, and international level likely requires a 
While these reforms are on-going, most are associated with 
long-term funding horizon, programming flexibility, and 
former-USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah (January 2010-
mechanisms to spread ideas throughout the agency—each a 
February 2015). A new administrator may bring a different 
challenge in itself. 
set of operational and policy priorities to the agency. 
Challenges  
Security. Security concerns in non-permissive 
environments, such as South Sudan and Afghanistan, raise 
numerous obstacles to successful project implementation, 
USAID faces multiple challenges in the process of fulfilling 
including restricted access to local projects for monitoring 
its mission, in part due to the setting in which it often 
purposes and finding contractors willing to take the risk of 
operates—developing countries. Among the continuing and 
establishing a local presence. In “normal” countries, 
new challenges that observers have noted and the Congress 
security concerns have often caused the co-location of 
may track closely are the following: 
USAID in isolated and extremely secure U.S. embassies 
that discourage the interaction with local government and 
Local Solutions.  Working more closely with local 
private sector considered necessary by many observers for 
governments, civil society, and private business presents 
successful development programs. 
multiple challenges to USAID, the greatest of which is 
accountability concerns as increasing amounts of U.S. 
For further background on the agency and related 
taxpayer dollars are directed through local entities in at 
issues, see CRS Report R44117, U.S. Agency for 
times corrupt societies. Efforts to mitigate risk generally 
International Development (USAID): Background, 
require more personnel and consequent funding to monitor 
Operations, and Issues, and CRS In Focus IF10183, U.S. 
local entities and build their capacities.    
Foreign Assistance. 
Sustainability. How can USAID ensure that project efforts 
Curt Tarnoff, ctarnoff@crs.loc.gov, 7-7656 
are maintained by local governments and organizations 
 
after U.S. financial and technical support ends? One 
USAID response is the Local Solutions initiative that seeks 
IF10261 
 www.crs.gov  |  7-5700