

 
May 11, 2015
Rwanda: Current Issues
Overview 
Figure 1. Rwanda Key Facts 
Under the leadership of President Paul Kagame, Rwanda 
has become known for its rapid development and security 
gains since the devastating 1994 genocide, in which an 
estimated 800,000 people were killed. The minority ethnic 
Tutsi community was targeted in the genocide, along with 
politically moderate members of the Hutu majority, in a 
state-backed extermination campaign. The Tutsi-led 
Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) took power in 1994 and 
ended the genocide. RPF efforts to improve health systems, 
the economy, and gender equality have received substantial 
support from foreign donors, including the United States. 
Development indicators have improved markedly in the 
past two decades, but poverty remains widespread. While 
praising Rwanda’s progress, U.S. officials have also 
criticized its domestic constraints on political and civil 
freedoms and the government’s recent history of backing 
rebel groups in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). 
 
By investing in its people, Rwanda is building a strong 
The State Department’s most recent human rights report 
foundation for peace and prosperity in the years to 
states that one of Rwanda’s “most important human rights 
come. Secretary of State John Kerry, July 2, 2014. 
problems” is “the government’s targeting of political 
opponents and human rights advocates for harassment, 
arrest, and abuse.” Some observers question whether 
President Kagame has been in office since 2000, and 
constraints on freedom of expression and political activity 
previously served as Vice President and Defense Minister 
may threaten stability by depriving opponents of peaceful 
in post-genocide transitional regimes. He last won 
avenues for activism.  
reelection with 93% of votes in 2010. The election was 
Some RPF defectors and other regime opponents have 
peaceful and well organized, but observers—including 
attempted to organize outside the country. Human rights 
Obama Administration officials—expressed concerns about 
organizations accuse the government of targeting exiled 
media restrictions, the expulsion of an international human 
dissidents for assassination, which the government denies. 
rights researcher prior to the vote, and prohibitions on 
In early 2014, a top RPF defector—a former head of 
opposition party participation. Analysts debate whether 
external intelligence who had become active in a diaspora 
Kagame may seek to remain in office past 2017, when his 
opposition movement known as the Rwanda National 
current term ends and he faces constitutional term limits. 
Congress (RNC)—was murdered in South Africa. President 
Politics and Security 
Kagame said in a press interview that “Rwanda did not kill 
this person... but I add that, I actually wish Rwanda did it.” 
He also reportedly stated in public remarks that “whoever 
The RPF dominates state institutions, and Kagame appears 
betrays the country will pay the price.” Another leading 
to face no serious internal challenger. Independent 
RNC figure, former army chief of staff General Kayumba 
opposition parties, media outlets, and civil society groups 
Nyamwasa, was the victim of an armed attack in 2010 
are few in number and reportedly operate with difficulty. 
while living in South Africa. In 2014, a South African court 
Public criticism of the RPF’s overarching policies or 
convicted two Rwandans and two Tanzanians in the attack, 
legitimacy is not tolerated; nor is public discussion of 
and the judge stated that he believed the incident was 
ethnic identity. Critics assert that the government has used 
politically motivated. 
laws criminalizing “genocide ideology” and “divisionism,” 
along with national security provisions, to suppress dissent, 
Rwanda’s military is considered to be among the most 
to justify prosecutions of journalists and opposition figures, 
effective in Africa. Rwandan peacekeepers have 
and to limit the ability of human rights groups to report on 
participated in multiple U.N. and African-led peacekeeping 
the country. Rwandan officials reject allegations of abusing 
operations, and are generally reported to be disciplined and 
human rights, while often arguing that some restrictions are 
committed. In 2015, however, news reports implicated 
needed to prevent the return of ethnic violence and 
Rwandan soldiers serving in Mali in the shooting of 
asserting that the country is gradually liberalizing. 
protesters during a violent anti-U.N. demonstration. 
Rwanda reportedly withdrew the units involved. 
www.crs.gov  |  7-5700 
Rwanda: Current Issues 
Rwanda asserts that it faces a national security threat from 
investment and trade, but political differences among EAC 
the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda 
members have hindered progress.  
(FDLR), a DRC-based militia founded by Hutu extremists 
involved in the Rwandan genocide. The FDLR and its 
Donor aid is substantial, and Rwanda qualified for 
leaders are under United Nations (U.N.) and U.S. sanctions. 
international debt relief in 2005. However, in 2012, some 
The FDLR is also nominally the target of DRC military 
donors reduced or redirected funding due to Rwanda’s role 
operations, and the U.N. peacekeeping operation in DRC is 
in the M23 crisis. In response, Rwanda sought new 
authorized to disarm it. However, previous military 
domestic and private-sector sources of finance, creating a 
operations have failed to defeat the group. In 2014, Human 
national “solidarity” fund, which solicits donations, and 
Rights Watch reported that Rwanda had held some alleged 
issuing international bonds.  
FDLR collaborators in unacknowledged detention centers 
U.S. Policy and Aid 
prior to charging them in court.  
The United States and Rwanda have cultivated close ties 
Role in Democratic Republic of Congo 
since the late 1990s, although in recent years the Obama 
Rwanda has security, political, and economic interests in its 
Administration and some Members of Congress have 
larger and chronically unstable neighbor. It has deployed its 
expressed concerns about Rwanda’s domestic and regional 
military into DRC on several occasions since the 1990s, and 
policies. As noted above, the Administration openly 
has reportedly backed several armed rebellions there. At 
criticized Rwanda’s role in the M23 insurgency in DRC. 
times, Rwandan and DRC troops have also cooperated in 
Congress has also enacted restrictions on certain types of 
operations to counter militia groups in DRC. While denying 
U.S. military aid to Rwanda through foreign aid 
specific allegations of backing DRC rebel groups, Rwandan 
appropriations measures since FY2010. Previously, U.S. 
officials often voice potential justifications for such actions. 
officials had largely avoided public censure of Rwanda. 
They contend that DRC security forces have failed to rein 
U.S. bilateral aid to Rwanda grew significantly from $39 
in groups, such as the FDLR, that threaten Rwanda—and 
million appropriated in FY2003 to $188 million in FY2014. 
have at times collaborated with them. Officials also 
In part, this rise reflected overall trends in U.S. aid to 
sometimes point to discrimination and violence targeting 
Africa, which increased substantially during the same 
ethnic communities of Rwandan origin in DRC, implying 
period, particularly for health programs. It also reflected a 
that they may require protection. Some analysts contend 
widely-held view that Rwanda is a leader in achieving 
that economic incentives are another factor in Rwanda’s 
donor-assisted development outcomes. U.S. aid to Rwanda 
involvement in DRC, and that powerful Rwandans have 
is largely focused on health, food security, and other 
profited from resource smuggling there. 
socioeconomic goals, along with support for Rwanda’s 
U.S. officials publicly criticized Rwanda in 2012 and 2013 
participation in international peacekeeping operations. The 
for providing support to a DRC-based armed group known 
Administration requested $171 million in bilateral aid for 
as the M23. Rwandan officials denied the allegations, and 
Rwanda in FY2015, a slight decrease compared to FY2014, 
instead blamed instability on DRC’s institutional 
of which 72% would be for health assistance. The 
dysfunctions and a lack of political will to confront security 
Administration has requested $161 million for FY2016. 
challenges. In late 2013, the DRC military, backed by U.N. 
U.S. support for Rwandan peacekeepers is provided 
peacekeeping troops, defeated the M23. Earlier that year, 
separately from these bilateral aid allocations, and includes 
Rwanda signed onto a U.N.-backed regional peace 
training, equipment, and other assistance.  
“framework accord” that prohibited neighboring states from 
In 2012 and 2013, legislation enacted by Congress resulted 
involvement in conflicts in DRC. Widespread insecurity 
in restrictions on some types of U.S. military aid for 
persists in eastern DRC, but there have been fewer reports 
Rwanda. The FY2012 Consolidated Appropriations Act 
of direct Rwandan involvement. 
(P.L. 112-74) prohibited Foreign Military Financing (FMF) 
if Rwanda was found to be providing support to DRC-based 
The Economy 
armed groups. The Administration also applied a security 
Donor aid, political stability, and pro-investor policies have 
assistance prohibition contained in the Child Soldiers 
contributed to economic growth averaging nearly 8% per 
Prevention Act (P.L. 110-457, as amended) in connection 
year over the past decade. Key foreign exchange earners 
with Rwanda’s support for the M23, which reportedly used 
include a small but growing mining sector, tourism, and 
child soldiers. Both provisions exempted most aid related to 
exports of coffee and tea. Still, about 90% of Rwandans 
peacekeeping support. The Administration lifted both 
remain engaged in agriculture, many for subsistence, and 
restrictions in 2014, citing the end of the M23 rebellion.  
about 45% reportedly live below the poverty line. Rwanda 
The FY2015 Consolidated and Further Appropriations Act 
has the highest population density in continental Africa, 
(P.L. 113-235) prohibits FMF for Rwanda, except for 
which threatens the sustainability of subsistence farming. 
certain purposes (including peacekeeping), unless the 
The government is undertaking ambitious efforts to 
Secretary of State certifies that Rwanda is “implementing a 
transform the economy into one that is services-oriented, to 
policy to cease political, military and/or financial support” 
lower birth rates, and to develop domestic sources of 
for armed groups in DRC. 
energy, with the goal of making Rwanda a middle-income 
country by 2020. Regional economic integration backed by 
Alexis Arieff, aarieff@crs.loc.gov, 7-2459 
the East African Community (EAC) could boost foreign 
 
IF10179 
 www.crs.gov  |  7-5700