.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
Jim Monke
Specialist in Agricultural Policy
April 8, 2015
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
RS21977
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
Summary
The federal government provides credit assistance to farmers to help assure adequate and reliable
lending in rural areas, particularly for farmers who cannot obtain loans elsewhere. Federal farm
loan programs also target credit to beginning farmers and socially-disadvantaged groups.
The primary federal lender to farmers, though with a small share of the market, is the Farm
Service Agency (FSA) in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). Congress funds FSA loans
with annual discretionary appropriations—about $79 million of budget authority and $315
million for salaries—to support $6.4 billion of new direct loans and guarantees. FSA issues direct
loans to farmers who cannot qualify for regular credit and guarantees the repayment of loans
made by other lenders. FSA thus is called a lender of last resort. Of about $318 billion in total
farm debt, FSA provides about 2.3% through direct loans and guarantees about another 4%-5% of
loans.
Another federally related lender is the Farm Credit System (FCS)—cooperatively owned and
funded by the sale of bonds in the financial markets. Congress sets the statutes that govern the
FCS banks and lending associations, mandating that they serve agriculture-related borrowers.
FCS makes loans to creditworthy farmers and is not a lender of last resort. FCS accounts for
42.5% of farm debt and is the largest lender for farm real estate.
Commercial banks are the other primary agricultural lender, holding slightly less than FCS with
40.1% of total farm debt. Commercial banks are the largest lender for farm production loans.
Generally speaking, the farm sector’s balance sheet has remained strong in recent years. While
delinquency rates on farm loans increased from 2008 into 2010, farmers and agricultural lenders
did not face credit problems as severe as those of other economic sectors. Since 2010, loan
repayment rates have improved. But appropriations for the FSA loan program—and the ability of
FSA to meet demand for its loans and guarantees—have been constrained during an era of tight
federal budgets.
Congressional Research Service
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
Contents
Current Situation .............................................................................................................................. 1
Major Players and Market Shares .............................................................................................. 1
The Farm Balance Sheet ............................................................................................................ 3
Delinquency Rates on Farm Loans ............................................................................................ 5
Description of Government-Related Farm Lenders ......................................................................... 7
USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA) .......................................................................................... 7
Farm Credit System (FCS) ........................................................................................................ 7
Farmer Mac ............................................................................................................................... 8
Recent Congressional Issues ............................................................................................................ 8
Competition Between Farm Credit System and Commercial Banks ......................................... 8
Credit Title in the 2014 Farm Bill ............................................................................................. 8
Term Limits on USDA Farm Loans .......................................................................................... 9
Figures
Figure 1. Market Shares by Lender of Total Farm Debt, 1960-2013 ............................................... 2
Figure 2. Market Shares of Real Estate Farm Debt, 1960-2013 ...................................................... 2
Figure 3. Market Shares of Non-Real Estate Farm Debt, 1960-2013 .............................................. 2
Figure 4. Farm Assets, 1960-2015 ................................................................................................... 4
Figure 5. Farm Debt, 1960-2015 ..................................................................................................... 4
Figure 6. Debt-to-Asset Ratio, 1960-2015 ....................................................................................... 4
Figure 7. Net Farm Income, 1960-2015........................................................................................... 4
Figure 8. Net Farm Income and Government Payments, 1960-2015 .............................................. 4
Figure 9. Debt-to-Net Farm Income Ratio, 1960-2015 ................................................................... 4
Figure 10. Delinquency Rates on Commercial Bank Loans, 1990-2014 ......................................... 6
Figure 11. Nonperforming Farm Loans, 1990-2014 ........................................................................ 6
Tables
Table 1. Term Limits on Farm Service Agency Loans..................................................................... 9
Contacts
Author Contact Information............................................................................................................. 9
Congressional Research Service
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
Current Situation
Major Players and Market Shares
The federal government has a long history of assisting farmers with obtaining loans for farming.
This intervention has been justified at one time or another by many factors, including the
presence of asymmetric information among lenders, asymmetric information between lenders and
farmers, lack of competition in some rural lending markets, insufficient lending resources in rural
areas compared to more populated areas, and the desire for targeted lending to disadvantaged
groups (such as small farms or socially disadvantaged farmers).1
Several types of lenders make loans to farmers. Some are government entities or have a statutory
mandate to serve agriculture. The one most controlled by the federal government is the Farm
Service Agency (FSA) in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). It receives federal
appropriations to make direct loans to farmers and to issue guarantees on loans made by
commercial lenders to farmers who do not qualify for regular credit. FSA is a lender of last resort,
but also of first opportunity because it targets loans or reserves funds for disadvantaged groups.
The lender with the next-largest amount of government intervention is the Farm Credit System
(FCS). It is a cooperatively owned and funded—but federally chartered—private lender with a
statutory mandate to serve agriculture-related borrowers only. FCS makes loans to creditworthy
farmers, and is not a lender of last resort, but is a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE). Third
is Farmer Mac, another GSE that is privately held, and provides a secondary market for
agricultural loans. FSA, FCS, and Farmer Mac are described in more detail later in this report.
Other lenders do not have direct government involvement in their funding or existence. These
include commercial banks, life insurance companies, and individuals, merchants, and dealers.
Figure 1 shows that the FCS and commercial banks provide most of the farm credit (42.5% and
40.1%, respectively), followed by individuals and others (9.4%), and life insurance companies
(4.2%). FSA provides about 2.3% of the debt through direct loans. FSA also guarantees about
another 4%-5% of the market through loans that are made by commercial banks and the FCS.
The total amount of farm debt ($318 billion in 2014) is concentrated relatively more in real estate
debt (58%) than in non-real estate debt (42%). FCS is the largest lender for real estate (49%),
although both commercial banks’ and FCS’s shares have grown as others’ shares have decreased
(Figure 2). Commercial banks are the largest lender for non-real estate loans (49%), although
FCS has gained share in recent years as the shares by others have decreased (Figure 3).
As the figures show, market shares among these lenders have changed over time. Commercial
banks held relatively little farm real estate debt through 1985, but now hold a sizeable amount
(Figure 2). The share of loans from “individuals and others” has steadily decreased over time,
with fewer private contracts for farm real estate and relatively less dealer financing in operating
credits. FSA held a much larger share of farm debt during the farm financial crisis of the 1980s,
but that ratio declined as the farm economy improved through the 1990s (Figure 3).
1 USDA-FSA, Evaluating the Relative Cost Effectiveness of the Farm Service Agency’s Farm Loan Programs, report to
Congress, August 2006, pp. 11-17, at http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/farm_loan_study_august_06.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
1
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
Figure 1. Market Shares by Lender of Total Farm Debt, 1960-2013
100%
9.4%
Individuals and
90%
others
4.2%
80%
2.3%
Life ins. co.
70%
USDA-FSA
40.1%
60%
50%
Commercial banks
1.4%
40%
30%
Farmer Mac
20%
42.5%
Farm Credit System
10%
0%
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Source: CRS, using USDA-Economic Research Data (ERS) data at http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-
products/farm-income-and-wealth-statistics.aspx.
Notes: Shares in the graph are for direct loans; guarantees issued on other lenders’ loans are not shown.
USDA-FSA issued guarantees on about 4%-5% of farm loans that are not shown separately but are included in
the shares of commercial banks and the Farm Credit System. ERS began publishing data on Farmer Mac in 2002.
Figure 2. Market Shares of Real Estate
Figure 3. Market Shares of Non-Real
Farm Debt, 1960-2013
Estate Farm Debt, 1960-2013
(58% of total farm debt in 2013)
(42% of total farm debt in 2013)
100%
100%
Individuals
90%
Individuals
90%
and others
and others
80%
80%
Life ins. co.
70%
USDA-FSA
70%
USDA-FSA
60%
60%
50%
Commercial
50%
banks
40%
40%
Commercial
Farmer Mac
30%
banks
30%
Farm Credit
20%
20%
System
10%
10%
Farm Credit
System
0%
0%
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Source: CRS, using USDA-ERS data.
Source: CRS, using USDA-ERS data.
Congressional Research Service
2
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
The Farm Balance Sheet
As a whole, farm sector assets have remained strong despite pressure on other real estate sectors.
The value of farm assets has grown steadily since the end of the 1980s, particularly since 2003.
At the end of 2014, farm assets reached nearly $3 trillion, though the rate of growth has slowed
(Figure 4). These highs in total farm assets now exceed the previous peak from 1980 in inflation-
adjusted terms,2 but inflation-adjusted assets are forecasted to decline slightly in 2015. Real estate
is about 82% of the total amount of farm assets; machinery and vehicles are the next-largest
category at about 9% of the total.3
Farm debt reached a historic high of $318 billion at the end of 2014 (Figure 5). Debt is
forecasted to rise 3% in 2015. In inflation-adjusted terms, however, this level of debt—though
still rising—still is well below the peak debt levels of the 1980s.
Debts and assets can be compared in a single measure by dividing debts by assets—the debt-to-
asset ratio. A lower debt-to-asset ratio generally implies less financial risk to the sector than a
higher ratio. Farm debt-to-asset ratio levels have declined fairly steadily since the late 1980s after
the farm financial crisis, and reached a historic low of 10.6% in 2014. When farm asset growth
paused in 2008-2009, the debt-to-asset ratio rose to 12.5% (Figure 6). By 2012, the debt-to-asset
ratio had returned to historically low levels. In 2015, the debt-to-asset ratio is forecasted to
increase slightly to 10.9%. But as a whole, farms are not as highly leveraged as they were in the
farm financial crisis of the 1980s.
Net farm income has become more variable, especially since 2000. After reaching historic highs
in 2004, net farm income fell by a third in two years (Figure 7). After peaking again in 2008 at
$85 billion, net farm income fell by one-quarter in one year. New highs were set in 2011 and
2013, but net farm income is expected to decline by 43% in two years into 2015. The relatively
low net farm income forecasted for 2015, however, still is within 20% of the 10-year average.4
Government payments to farmers also have risen from decades ago, but do not always offset the
variability in net farm income. Fixed direct payments that were not tied to prices or revenue were
the primary form of government payments in recent years; these payments supported farm
income but did not necessarily help farmers manage risks. Figure 8 shows that more of net farm
income is coming from the market rather than the government, compared to the 1980s.
Another indicator of farmers’ leverage compares debt to net farm income. A lower debt-to-income
ratio (with the ratio expressing the number of years of current income that debt represents)
implies less financial leverage and risk. The farm-debt-to-net-farm-income ratio is more variable
than the debt-to-asset ratio because of the variability of net farm income. It reached a 35-year low
of 2.3 in 2004 and rose to 4.3 in 2009 before falling again to 2.4 in 2013. However, the expected
decline in net farm income in 2014-2015 has caused this measure to rise to a forecasted level not
seen since 2009, 2002, and 1986—a level outside the 50-year historical range of 2 to 4 (Figure
9).
2 Comparisons are made to conditions in the 1980s because that was the last major financial crisis in agriculture.
3 USDA, Economic Research Service, Farm Income and Wealth Statistics, at http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/
farm-income-and-wealth-statistics.aspx.
4 CRS Report R40152, U.S. Farm Income Outlook for 2015.
Congressional Research Service
3
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
Figure 4. Farm Assets, 1960-2015
Figure 5. Farm Debt, 1960-2015
Billion dollars
Billion dollars
3,500
450
Farm assets
Farm debt
3,000
400
in 2015 dollars
in 2015 dollars
350
2,500
300
2,000
250
1,500
200
150
1,000
100
500
50
0
0
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Source: CRS, using USDA-ERS data.
Source: CRS, using USDA-ERS data.
Notes: 2015 forecast.
Notes: 2015 forecast.
Figure 6. Debt-to-Asset Ratio, 1960-2015
Figure 7. Net Farm Income, 1960-2015
25%
Billion dollars
140
Net farm income
20%
120
in 2015 dollars
10-year average
100
15%
80
10%
60
40
5%
20
0%
0
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Source: CRS, using USDA-ERS data.
Source: CRS, using USDA-ERS data.
Notes: 2015 forecast.
Notes: 2015 forecast.
Figure 8. Net Farm Income and
Figure 9. Debt-to-Net Farm Income
Government Payments, 1960-2015
Ratio, 1960-2015
Billion dollars
14
140
Net farm income
12
120
Government payments
10
100
80
8
60
6
40
4
20
2
0
0
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
Source: CRS, using USDA-ERS data.
Source: CRS, using USDA-ERS data.
Notes: 2015 forecast.
Notes: 2015 forecast.
Congressional Research Service
4
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
Delinquency Rates on Farm Loans
While the global financial crisis was slower to affect the balance sheets of farmers and
agricultural lenders than the housing market, its presence was observed in agricultural lending.
Credit standards were tightened (more documentation and oversight of loans was required) and
lenders sometimes made less credit available to producers. As the lender of last resort, the USDA
Farm Service Agency experienced significantly higher demand for its direct loans and guarantees.
In 2007, 2008, and 2010, farm commodity prices were particularly high, supporting farm income
at above-average levels. But in 2006 and 2009, net farm income fell by about one-third (Figure
7), reducing some farmers’ ability to repay loans, particularly in some farm sectors such as dairy,
hogs, and poultry. Recent strong farm income has improved most farmers’ ability to repay loans.
Delinquency rates on residential mortgages began to rise in 2005, and for all loans particularly in
2007. Delinquencies include loans that are 30 days or more past due and still accruing interest, as
well as those in nonaccrual status. The delinquency rates on residential mortgages and all loans
appear to have reached a peak in mid-2010 (11.3% for residential mortgages and 7.4% for all
commercial bank loans, Figure 10). The delinquency rates for agricultural loans did not begin to
rise until mid-2008, after continuing to fall to historic lows while delinquencies were rising in
residential mortgages and other loans. Moreover, the rate of increase in delinquencies on farm
production loans at commercial banks has not been as sharp as in the non-farm sectors and
peaked in June 2010 at 3.3%. Delinquency rates on farm production loans at commercial banks
have since returned to historic lows below 1%.5
A more severe measure of loan performance is nonperforming loans. Nonperforming loans
include nonaccrual loans and accruing loans 90 days or more past due. These loans are more in
jeopardy than delinquent loans, and represent a smaller subset of loans. Within the agricultural
loan portfolio, FCS nonperforming loans rose from 0.5% at the beginning of 2008 to a near-term
peak of 2.8% on September 30, 2009, before decreasing again to about 0.9% as of December 31,
2014 (Figure 11).6 The FCS nonperforming loan rate has returned to levels of the 2001-2007
period after the system had finally recovered from the farm financial crisis of the 1980s.
Nonperforming farm loans at commercial banks also rose but have declined to more normal
levels. Nonperforming farm real estate loans at commercial banks rose from a low of 0.7% in
December 2006 to 2.9% in March 2011, before declining to 1.2% as of September 30, 2014.
Nonperforming farm production loans rose from a low of 0.6% in December 2006 to 2.4% in
March 2010, before declining again to 0.6% as of September 30, 2014 (Figure 11).7
5 Federal Reserve Bank, “Delinquency Rates on Loans at Commercial Banks” (seasonally adjusted), at http://www.
federalreserve.gov/releases/chargeoff.
6 Farm Credit System, Annual and Quarterly Information Statements, at http://www.farmcreditfunding.com/ffcb_live/
financialInformation.html?tab=statements.
7 Federal Reserve Bank, Agricultural Finance Data Book, Tables B.2 and B.4, at http://www.kansascityfed.org/
research/indicatorsdata/agfinance/index.cfm.
Congressional Research Service
5
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
Figure 10. Delinquency Rates on Commercial Bank Loans, 1990-2014
12%
10%
Single-family
residential
8%
6%
All loans
4%
2%
Farm production
loans
0%
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
Source: Compiled by CRS. Data through December 31, 2014, using Federal Reserve Bank, “Delinquency Rates
on Loans at Commercial Banks” (seasonal y adjusted), at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/chargeoff.
Notes: Delinquencies include loans that are 30 days or more past due and still accruing interest, as well as those
in nonaccrual status. The amounts are percentages of end-of-period loans.
Figure 11. Nonperforming Farm Loans, 1990-2014
5%
4%
Commercial bank
farm real estate
3%
Farm Credit
System
2%
1%
Commercial bank
farm production
0%
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
Source: Compiled by CRS. Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corp. data through December 31, 2014, at
http://www.farmcredit-ffcb.com. Federal Reserve Bank, Agricultural Finance Data Book, Tables B.2 and B.4, through
September 30, 2014, at http://www.kansascityfed.org/research/indicatorsdata/agfinance/index.cfm.
Notes: Nonperforming loans include nonaccrual loans and accruing loans 90 days or more past due. The
amounts are percentages of total loans.
Congressional Research Service
6
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
Description of Government-Related Farm Lenders
USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA)
USDA’s Farm Service Agency is considered a lender of last resort because it makes direct farm
ownership and operating loans to family-sized farms that are unable to obtain credit elsewhere.
FSA also guarantees timely payment of principal and interest on qualified loans made by
commercial banks and the FCS. Permanent authority exists in the Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1921 et seq.) and is usually modified in periodic farm bills.
Prior to the banking crisis in 2008, FSA usually made and guaranteed about $3.5 billion of farm
loans annually. Supplemental appropriations during the financial crisis raised FSA loan activity to
about $6.0 billion in FY2010. In FY2015, an appropriation of $79 million in budget authority
(plus $315 million for salaries and expenses) supports the issuance of $6.4 billion of new direct
loans and guarantees.8
Direct loans are limited to $300,000 per borrower ($35,000 for microloans), and guaranteed loans
to $1,392,000 per borrower (adjusted annually for inflation). Direct emergency loans are
available for disasters.9
Part of the FSA loan program is reserved for beginning farmers and ranchers (7 U.S.C. 1994
(b)(2)). For direct loans, 75% of the funding for farm ownership loans and 50% of operating loans
are reserved for the first 11 months of the fiscal year. For guaranteed loans, 40% is reserved for
ownership loans and farm operating loans for the first half of the fiscal year. Funds are also
targeted to “socially disadvantaged” farmers by race, gender, and ethnicity (7 U.S.C. 2003).
Because of these provisions, FSA also is known as lender of first opportunity for borrowers who
may not yet be creditworthy enough to obtain regular commercial business loans.
Farm Credit System (FCS)
Congress established the Farm Credit System in 1916 to provide a dependable and affordable
source of credit to rural areas at a time when commercial lenders avoided farm loans. FCS is
neither a government agency nor guaranteed by the U.S. government, but is a network of
borrower-owned lending institutions operating as a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE). It is
not a lender of last resort; it is a for-profit lender with a statutory mandate to serve agriculture.
Funds are raised through the sale of bonds on Wall Street. Four large banks allocate these funds to
76 credit associations that, in turn, make loans to eligible creditworthy borrowers.10
Statutes and oversight by the House and Senate Agriculture Committees determine the scope of
FCS activity (Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended; 12 U.S.C. 2001 et seq). Benefits such as tax
exemptions also are provided. Eligibility is limited to farmers, certain farm-related
8 CRS Report R43669, Agriculture and Related Agencies: FY2015 Appropriations.
9 USDA Farm Service Agency, Farm Loan Program, at http://www.fsa.usda.gov/dafl.
10 Farm Credit System, at http://www.farmcreditnetwork.com.
Congressional Research Service
7
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
agribusinesses, rural homeowners in towns under 2,500 population, and cooperatives.11 The
federal regulator is the Farm Credit Administration (FCA).12
Farmer Mac
Farmer Mac is a separate GSE that is a secondary market for agricultural loans.13 Some consider
it related to the FCS in that FCA is its regulator and that it was created by the same legislation,
but it is financially and organizationally a separate entity. Farmer Mac purchases mortgages from
lenders and guarantees mortgage-backed securities that are bought by investors. Permanent
authority rests in the Farm Credit Act of 1971 (12 U.S.C. 2001 et seq.).
Recent Congressional Issues
Competition Between Farm Credit System and Commercial Banks
The Farm Credit System is unique among the GSEs because it is a retail lender making loans
directly to farmers and thus is in direct competition with commercial banks. Because of this direct
competition for creditworthy borrowers, the FCS and commercial banks often have an adversarial
relationship in the policy realm. Commercial banks assert unfair competition from the FCS for
borrowers because of tax advantages that can lower the relative cost of funds for the FCS.14 They
often call for increased congressional oversight. The FCS counters by citing its statutory mandate
(and limitations) to serve agricultural borrowers in good times and bad times.15
In contrast, the Farm Service Agency’s loan programs are supported by both the FCS and
commercial banks. FSA is not regarded as a competitor since it serves farmers who otherwise
may not be able to obtain credit. Commercial banks and the Farm Credit System particularly
support the FSA loan guarantee program because it allows them to make and service loans that
otherwise might not be possible or at reduced risk.
Credit Title in the 2014 Farm Bill
The enacted 2014 farm bill (P.L. 113-79) made relatively small policy changes to USDA’s
permanently authorized farm loan programs.
It gave USDA discretion to recognize alternative legal entities to qualify for farm loans and
allowed alternatives to meet a three-year farming experience requirement. It increased the
maximum size of down-payment loans and eliminated term limits on guaranteed operating loans
(by removing a maximum number of years that an individual can remain eligible). It increased the
percentage of a conservation loan that can be guaranteed, added another lending priority for
11 CRS Report RS21278, Farm Credit System.
12 Farm Credit Administration, at http://www.fca.gov/index.html.
13 FarmerMac, at https://www.farmermac.com.
14 For example, American Bankers Association, letter to House and Senate Agriculture Committees, February 2, 2015,
at http://www.aba.com/Advocacy/LetterstoCongress/Documents/LetterSenateAgCommreFCS-Oversight020215.pdf.
15 For example, Farm Credit Council, letter to House and Senate Agriculture Committees, February 5, 2015, at
http://www.fccouncil.com/files/FCC_Letters_in_Response_to_ABA_5Feb2015.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
8
c11173008
.
Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
beginning farmers, and facilitated loans for the purchase of highly fractionated land in Indian
reservations, among other changes.16
Term Limits on USDA Farm Loans
Congress added “term limits” to the USDA farm loan program in 1992 and 1996 to restrict
eligibility for government farm loans and encourage farmers to “graduate” to commercial loans.
The term limits place a maximum number of years that farmers are eligible for certain types of
FSA loans or guarantees. However, until the end of 2010, Congress had suspended enforcement
of term limits on guaranteed operating loans to prevent some farmers from being denied credit,
and the 2014 farm bill eliminated that term limit (Table 1).
Table 1. Term Limits on Farm Service Agency Loans
Maximum number of years that farmers are eligible for loans
Type of FSA Loan
Direct loans term limits
Guaranteed loans term limits
Farm Operating Loans (OL)
6 years, plus possible 2-yr. extensiona
No term limitb
Farm Ownership Loans (FO)
10 yearsc
No term limitd
Source: CRS, based on statute and unpublished USDA data.
Note: Term limits are separate from the maximum maturity or duration of an individual loan, which may be as
long as 40 years for a farm ownership loan or as short as one year for a farm operating loan.
a. Direct operating loans are limited to a six-year period. In certain cases, borrowers may qualify for a one-
time, two-year extension (7 U.S.C. 1941(c)(1)(C) and (c)(4)). In June 2009, USDA said that about 4,800 FSA
borrowers were limited to one more year, and another 7,800 borrowers were limited to two more years.
USDA did not expect many to graduate to commercial credit (USDA-FSA Administrator, testimony to the
House Agriculture Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, Energy and Research, June 11, 2009).
b. Prior to the 2014 farm bill, guaranteed operating loans were limited to a 15-year period (former 7 U.S.C.
1949(b)(1)). However, enforcement of that term limit was suspended by statute until December 31, 2010.
Upon expiration of the suspension, the 15-year term limit was enforced from 2011-2013. In December
2010, USDA had said that about 1,600 borrowers had reached the guaranteed term limit. The 2014 farm bill
permanently removed this term limit (P.L. 113-79 sec. 5107).
c. A borrower is eligible for direct farm ownership (real estate) loans for a maximum of 10 years after the first
loan is made (7 U.S.C. 1922(b)(1)(C)).
d. USDA-FSA, Evaluating the Relative Cost Effectiveness of the Farm Service Agency’s Farm Loan Programs, report to
Congress, August 2006, p. 76, at http://www.fsa.usda.gov/Internet/FSA_File/farm_loan_study_august_06.pdf.
Author Contact Information
Jim Monke
Specialist in Agricultural Policy
jmonke@crs.loc.gov, 7-9664
16 For details, see Title V in CRS Report R43076, The 2014 Farm Bill (P.L. 113-79): Summary and Side-by-Side.
Congressional Research Service
9
c11173008