Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy
Andorra Bruno
Specialist in Immigration Policy
February 18, 2015
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
RL31269

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

Summary
A refugee is a person fleeing his or her country because of persecution or a well-founded fear of
persecution on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or
political opinion. Typically, the annual number of refugees that can be admitted into the United
States, known as the refugee ceiling, and the allocation of these numbers by region are set by the
President after consultation with Congress at the start of each fiscal year. For FY2015, the
worldwide refugee ceiling is 70,000, with 68,000 admissions numbers allocated among the
regions of the world and 2,000 numbers comprising an unallocated reserve. An unallocated
reserve is to be used if, and where, a need develops for refugee slots in excess of the allocated
numbers. The FY2015 regional allocations are, as follows: Africa (17,000), East Asia (13,000),
Europe and Central Asia (1,000), Latin America/Caribbean (4,000), and Near East/South Asia
(33,000).
Overseas processing of refugees is conducted through a system of three priorities for admission.
Priority 1 comprises cases involving persons facing compelling security concerns. Priority 2
comprises cases involving persons from specific groups of special humanitarian concern to the
United States (e.g., Iranian religious minorities). Priority 3 comprises family reunification cases
involving close relatives of persons admitted as refugees or granted asylum.
Special legislative provisions make it easier for members of certain groups to obtain refugee
status. The “Lautenberg Amendment,” which was first enacted in 1989, allows certain former
Soviet and Indochinese nationals to qualify for refugee status based on their membership in a
protected category with a credible fear of persecution. In 2004, Congress amended the Lautenberg
Amendment to add the “Specter Amendment,” which requires the designation of categories of
Iranian religious minorities whose cases are to be adjudicated under the Lautenberg Amendment’s
reduced evidentiary standard. Subsequent laws extended the Lautenberg Amendment, as amended
by the Specter Amendment. Most recently, the Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2015 (P.L. 113-235) extends the Lautenberg Amendment through September
30, 2015.
The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement (HHS/ORR)
administers an initial transitional assistance program for temporarily dependent refugees,
Cuban/Haitian entrants, and others. The FY2015 appropriation for refugee and entrant assistance
in P.L. 113-235 is $1,559,884,000.

Congressional Research Service

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

Contents
Background and Definitions ............................................................................................................ 1
Refugee Admissions ........................................................................................................................ 1
FY2015 Refugee Ceiling and Allocations ................................................................................. 4
Refugee Processing Priorities .................................................................................................... 4
Refugee Adjudications ............................................................................................................... 6
Admissibility of Refugees ................................................................................................... 6
Special Refugee Provisions ....................................................................................................... 7
Lautenberg Amendment and Specter Amendment .............................................................. 7
Vietnamese Refugees .......................................................................................................... 8
Refugee Resettlement Assistance .................................................................................................... 8

Tables
Table 1. Refugee Admissions Ceilings and Regional Allocations, FY2004-FY2015 ...................... 3
Table 2. Refugee Resettlement Funding, FY2006-FY2015 ............................................................. 9
Table 3. Refugee Eligibility for Major Federal Public Assistance Programs ................................ 10

Appendixes
Appendix. Refugee Admissions by Region, FY1987-FY2014 ...................................................... 11

Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 12

Congressional Research Service

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

Background and Definitions
The admission of refugees to the United States and their resettlement here are authorized by the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended by the Refugee Act of 1980.1 The 1980 Act
had two basic purposes: (1) to provide a uniform procedure for refugee admissions; and (2) to
authorize federal assistance to resettle refugees and promote their self-sufficiency. The intent of
the legislation was to end an ad hoc approach to refugee admissions and resettlement that had
characterized U.S. refugee policy since World War II.
Under the INA, a refugee is a person who is outside his or her country and who is unable or
unwilling to return because of persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution on account of
race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.2 In special
circumstances, a refugee also may be a person who is within his or her country and who is
persecuted or has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. Excluded from the INA definition of
a refugee is any person who participated in the persecution of another.3
Refugees are processed and admitted to the United States from abroad. The Department of State
(DOS) handles overseas processing of refugees and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) makes final determinations about
eligibility for admission. Separate provision is made in the INA for the granting of asylum on a
case-by-case basis to aliens who are physically present in the United States or at a land border or
port of entry and who meet the definition of a refugee.4 After one year in refugee status in the
United States, refugees are required to apply to adjust to lawful permanent resident (LPR) status.5
Refugee Admissions
The United States aims to consider for resettlement at least half of the refugees referred by the
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) for resettlement worldwide each
year, depending on the availability of funding. By law, the annual number of refugee admissions
and the allocation of these numbers by region of the world are set by the President after
consultation with Congress.6 Each year, the President submits a report to the House of
Representatives and the Senate, known as the consultation document, which contains the
Administration’s proposed worldwide refugee ceiling and regional allocations for the upcoming
fiscal year.7 Following congressional consultations on the Administration’s proposal, the

1 The INA is Act of June 27, 1952, ch. 477, codified, as amended, at 8 U.S.C. §§1101 et seq. The Refugee Act is P.L.
96-212, March 17, 1980.
2 This definition conforms with the definition used in the United Nations Convention and Protocol relating to the status
of refugees.
3 INA §101(a)(42).
4 INA §208..
5 INA §209(a). Asylees (those granted asylum) may apply for LPR status after one year, but are not required to do so.
There are no numerical limitations on refugee or asylee adjustments of status.
6 INA §207(a).
7 The consultation document for FY2015 is U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2015: Report to the
Congress, http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/232029.pdf (hereinafter cited as Proposed Refugee Admissions
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
1

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

President issues a Presidential Determination setting the refugee numbers for that year.8 Table 1
shows refugee admissions ceilings and regional allocations for FY2004-FY2015.
The U.S. refugee program was greatly impacted by the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. In
the aftermath of those attacks, a review of refugee-related security procedures was undertaken,
refugee admissions were briefly suspended, and enhanced security measures were implemented.
As a result of these and other factors, actual refugee admissions, which had totaled about 70,000
in FY2001, plunged to historically low levels in the years following the attacks. In FY2002, for
example, actual admissions totaled 27,131.9
Admissions subsequently rebounded, as shown in Table 1, exceeding 70,000 in each of FY2009
and FY2010, when the refugee ceiling was 80,000. As also shown in Table 1, however, there
were significantly fewer admissions in FY2011 (56,424) and FY2012 (58,238), when the refugee
ceiling was 80,000 and 76,000, respectively. The FY2013 consultation document attributed the
shortfalls in refugee arrivals in FY2011 and FY2012 largely to new security requirements.10
Refugee admissions increased in FY2013 and FY2014, totaling 69,927 and 69,987 respectively,
just under each year’s refugee ceiling of 70,000.The FY2014 and FY2015 consultation
documents provided the following explanations for the increases. According to the FY2014
consultation document:
Refugee arrivals in FY 2013 are up sharply from the previous two years thanks to the
concerted efforts of the many partners involved in U.S. resettlement... This success was
made possible in part by better synchronization of security and medical checks for refugee
families as well as investments in UNHCR’s ability to refer refugees from the Middle East
and Africa.11
According to the FY2015 consultation document:
Refugee arrivals in FY 2014 will again come close to reaching the President’s authorized
ceiling of 70,000. Close interagency coordination on security checks helped to make this
possible because it allowed us to scrutinize and process referrals more carefully and
efficiently. We also helped the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) enhance its
capacity to refer refugees for resettlement which in turn helped our program reach its
ceiling.12

(...continued)
for Fiscal Year 2015).
8 Asylees are not included in the refugee ceiling. There are no numerical limitations on the granting of asylum.
9 Prior to the 2001 terrorist attacks, annual refugee admissions had not been below 30,000 since FY1977, when
admissions totaled about 20,000. From FY1979 through FY2001, annual refugee admissions totaled more than 60,000.
For annual data on refugee admissions by region since FY1987, see Appendix.
10 U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2013: Report to the Congress, pp. iv-v, http://www.state.gov/
documents/organization/198157.pdf.
11 U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services, Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2014: Report to the Congress, p. ii, http://www.state.gov/
documents/organization/219137.pdf (hereinafter cited as Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2014).
12 Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2015, p. ii.
Congressional Research Service
2

---

Table 1. Refugee Admissions Ceilings and Regional Allocations, FY2004-FY2015
Region
FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015
Africa 30,000a 21,000b 20,000 22,000 16,000 12,000 15,500 15,000 12,000 15,950c 17,500d 17,000
East Asia
8,500a 13,000 15,000 16,000e 20,000 20,500f 18,000g 19,000 18,000 16,600c 14,700d 13,000
Europe and Central Asia
13,000
15,500b 15,000 6,500 3,000 2,500 2,500 2,000 2,000 650c 1,000 1,000
Latin America/Caribbean
3,500
7,000b 5,000 5,000 5,000h 5,500f 5,500g 5,500 5,500 4,400c 4,300d 4,000
Near East/South Asia
3,000a 3,500b 5,000 9,000e 28,000 39,500f 38,000g 35,500 35,500 32,400c 32,500d 33,000
Unallocated 12,000a 10,000b 10,000 11,500e 8,000h
—f 500g 3,000 3,000 —c
—d 2,000
Total
ceilings
70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 76,000 70,000 70,000 70,000
Actual
admissions
52,873 53,813 41,223 48,282 60,191 74,654 73,311 56,424 58,238 69,927 69,987
NA
Sources: For ceiling and allocation data: PD 2004-06, October 21, 2003; PD 2004-53, September 30, 2004; PD 2006-3, October 24, 2005; PD 2007-1, October 11, 2006;
PD 2008-1, October 2, 2007; PD 2008-29, September 30, 2008; PD 2009-32, September 30, 2009; PD 2011-02, October 8, 2010; PD 2011-17, September 30, 2011; PD
2012–17, September 28, 2012; PD 2014–01, October 2, 2013; PD 2014–17, September 30, 2014. U.S. Department of State, U.S. Department of Justice, and U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Proposed Refugee Admissions ... , FY2004-FY2015. For actual admissions data: U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Population,
Refugees and Migration.
a. Of the FY2004 ceiling of 70,000, 50,000 numbers were originally allocated by region and 20,000 were unallocated. The unallocated reserve was tapped during the year
to provide 8,000 additional numbers to Africa, East Asia, and Near East/South Asia.
b. Of the FY2005 ceiling of 70,000, 50,000 numbers were originally allocated by region and 20,000 were unallocated. The unallocated reserve was tapped during the year
to provide 10,000 additional numbers to Africa, Europe and Central Asia, Latin America/Caribbean, and Near East/South Asia.
c. Of the FY2013 ceiling of 70,000, 67,000 numbers were originally allocated by region and 3,000 were unallocated. The unallocated reserve was tapped and regional
allocations were shifted during the year to provide additional numbers to Africa and Near East/South Asia; all the original regional allocations were changed.
d. Of the FY2014 ceiling of 70,000, 68,000 numbers were originally allocated by region and 2,000 were unallocated. The unallocated reserve was tapped and regional
allocations were shifted during the year to provide additional numbers to Africa and East Asia; all the original regional al ocations were changed except that for Europe
and Central Asia.
e. Of the FY2007 ceiling of 70,000, 50,000 numbers were originally allocated by region and 20,000 were unallocated. The unallocated reserve was tapped during the year
to provide 8,500 additional numbers to East Asia and Near East/South Asia.
f.
Of the FY2009 ceiling of 80,000, 75,000 numbers were originally allocated by region and 5,000 were unallocated. The unallocated reserve was tapped during the year
to provide 5,000 additional numbers to East Asia, Latin America/Caribbean, and Near East/South Asia.
g. Of the FY2010 ceiling of 80,000, 75,000 numbers were originally allocated by region and 5,000 were unallocated. The unallocated reserve was tapped during the year
to provide 4,500 additional numbers to East Asia, Latin America/Caribbean, and Near East/South Asia.
h. Of the FY2008 ceiling of 80,000, 70,000 numbers were originally allocated by region and 10,000 were unallocated. The unallocated reserve was tapped during the year
to provide 2,000 additional numbers to Latin America/Caribbean.
CRS-3

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

FY2015 Refugee Ceiling and Allocations
On September 30, 2014, President Obama signed the Presidential Determination setting the
FY2015 worldwide refugee ceiling and regional levels.13 As indicated in Table 1, the FY2015
ceiling is 70,000.
The FY2015 refugee ceiling of 70,000 includes 68,000 admissions numbers allocated among the
regions of the world and an unallocated reserve of 2,000 numbers. The FY2015 regional
allocations are intended to cover previously approved refugees in the pipeline as well as new
cases. An unallocated reserve is to be used if, and where, a need develops for refugee slots in
excess of the allocated numbers. This has occurred in recent years, as detailed in Table 1.
Africa has been allocated 17,000 refugee admissions numbers for FY2015. The FY2014
allocation to the region was originally 15,000 but was increased to 17,500 to accommodate
additional admissions. FY2014 admissions totaled 17,476.14 FY2015 admissions are expected to
come primarily from East Africa and to include Somalis, Eritreans, and Congolese, among others.
East Asia’s FY2015 allocation is 13,000, compared to a revised FY2014 allocation of 14,700.
FY2014 admissions totaled 14,784. FY2014 admissions are expected to consist primarily of
Burmese refugees living in Malaysia and Thailand.
Europe and Central Asia have a combined FY2015 allocation of 1,000 refugee numbers, the same
as the FY2014 allocation. FY2014 admissions for this region totaled 959. The 2015 allocation
includes projected admissions of “Lautenberg Amendment” cases from the former Soviet Union
(see “Lautenberg Amendment and Specter Amendment”).
The FY2015 allocation for Latin America and the Caribbean is 4,000, compared to a revised
FY2014 allocation of 4,300. FY2014 admissions totaled 4,318. Cubans account for the vast
majority of admissions from this region.
The Near East/South Asia FY2015 allocation is 33,000, compared to a revised FY2014 allocation
of 32,500. FY2014 admissions totaled 32,450. FY2015 admissions are expected to include Iraqis,
Bhutanese, Iranians, Syrians, Pakistanis, and Afghans.
Refugee Processing Priorities
DOS is responsible for overseas processing of refugees. Generally, it arranges for a non-
governmental organization (NGO), an international organization, or U.S. embassy contractors to
manage a Resettlement Support Center (RSC) that assists in refugee processing. RSC staff
conduct pre-screening interviews of prospective refugees and prepare cases for submission to
USCIS, which handles refugee adjudications. Overseas refugee processing is conducted through a
system of three priorities for admission. These priorities are separate and distinct from whether
such persons qualify for refugee status.

13 U.S. President [Obama], “Presidential Determination on Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2015,” Presidential
Determination No. 2014–171 of September 30, 2014, 79 Federal Register, pp. 69753-69754, November 21, 2014.
14 See Appendix for annual refugee admissions numbers by region since FY1987.
Congressional Research Service
4

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

Priority 1 covers refugees for whom resettlement seems to be the appropriate durable solution,
who are referred to the U.S. refugee program by UNHCR, a U.S. embassy, or a designated NGO.
Such persons often have compelling protection needs, and may be in danger of attack or of being
returned to the country they fled. All nationalities are eligible for this priority.
Priority 2 covers groups of special humanitarian concern to the United States. It includes specific
groups that may be defined by their nationalities, clans, ethnicities, or other characteristics.
Unlike Priority 1 cases, individuals falling under Priority 2 are able to access the U.S. refugee
program without a UNHCR, embassy, or NGO referral. Some P-2 groups, such as Cuban
dissidents and certain former Soviet nationals (see “Lautenberg Amendment and Specter
Amendment”), are processed in their country of origin. A new P-2 group designated for FY2015,
which is being processed in-country, is for certain minors in El Salvador, Guatemala, and
Honduras. This program, known as the Central American Minors (CAM) program, is limited to
minors with parents who are lawfully present in the United States.
Some Priority 2 groups are processed outside their country of origin. These include Burmese in
refugee camps in Thailand and Iranian religious minorities processed in Austria and Turkey (see
“Lautenberg Amendment and Specter Amendment”). Another P-2 group, Iraqis associated with
the United States, is eligible for in-country processing in Iraq as well as processing outside that
country.15
Priority 3 covers family reunification cases. Refugee applications under Priority 3 are based upon
an affidavit of relationship (AOR) filed by an eligible relative in the United States. The Priority 3
program is limited to designated nationalities. For FY2015, Priority 3 processing is available to
nationals of 24 countries.16 Individuals falling under Priority 3, like those falling under Priority 2,
are able to access the U.S. refugee program without a UNHCR, embassy, or NGO referral.
The Priority 3 program has changed over the years. Since FY2004, qualifying family members
have been the spouses, unmarried children under age 21, and parents of persons who were
admitted to the United States as refugees or granted asylum.17 In October 2008, the U.S. refugee
program stopped accepting applications under Priority 3.18 Earlier in 2008, processing of Priority

15 The Refugee Crisis in Iraq Act of 2007 (Division A, Title XII, Subtitle C of P.L. 110-181, January 28, 2008)
designates certain Iraqis for P-2 processing.
16 The countries are: Afghanistan, Bhutan, Burma, Burundi, Central African Republic, Colombia, Cuba, Democratic
People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), El Salvador, Eritrea, Ethiopia,
Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Iran, Iraq, Mali, Somalia, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syria, and Uzbekistan.
Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2015, p. 13.
17 During the late 1990s, the State Department found that a large number of Priority 3 applications were received from
persons who did not qualify for refugee status and that there was a significant amount of fraud associated with these
applications. To address these problems, the U.S. government reduced the number of nationalities eligible for such
refugee slots. For FY2003, four nationalities were eligible for Priority 3 processing. For FY2004, the Priority 3
program was revised on a pilot basis. To simultaneously broaden access to the program and continue to address
concerns about fraud, the number of eligible nationalities was increased to nine, while the types of qualifying
relationships were restricted. As noted above, eligibility for Priority 3 currently requires a qualifying relationship with
an individual who was admitted to the United States as a refugee or granted asylum. Prior to FY2004, this processing
priority was available to those with qualifying relationships with a much wider range of legal U.S. residents without
regard to how these residents gained admission to the United States. In another change, since FY2004, children have to
be under age 21 to be eligible for Priority 3. In the past, this processing priority was also available to older unmarried
sons and daughters. These changes to the Priority 3 qualifying relationships have remained in place since FY2004.
18 U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, “Fraud in the Refugee Family
Reunification (Priority Three) Program,” fact sheet, December 4, 2008, http://2001-2009.state.gov/g/prm/refadm/rls/fs/
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
5

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

3 cases was suspended in certain locations in Africa “due to indications of extremely high rates of
fraud obtained through pilot DNA testing.”19 The Priority 3 program resumed in October 2012
with a new AOR form and requirement for DNA evidence of certain claimed biological parent-
child relationships. The first arrivals in the United States under the revamped P-3 program are
expected in FY2015.
Refugee Adjudications
USCIS is responsible for adjudicating refugee cases. It makes determinations about whether an
individual qualifies for refugee status and is otherwise admissible to the United States. In the past,
the majority of refugee adjudications were conducted by USCIS officers on temporary duty from
domestic asylum offices. Today, these adjudications are handled by USCIS officers in the
Refugee Corps.
Admissibility of Refugees
In order to be admitted to the United States, a prospective refugee must be admissible under
immigration law. The INA sets forth various grounds of inadmissibility, which include health-
related grounds, security-related grounds, public charge (i.e., indigence), and lack of proper
documentation. Some inadmissibility grounds (public charge, lack of proper documentation) are
not applicable to refugees. Others can be waived for humanitarian purposes, to assure family
unity, or when it is otherwise in the public interest.20 Of particular relevance to the admission of
refugees are certain health-related and security-related grounds of inadmissibility.
Under the INA health-related grounds of inadmissibility, an alien who is determined, in
accordance with Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations, to have a
communicable disease of public health significance is inadmissible. Until recently, human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was defined to be one of these diseases, although HIV-
infected refugees could apply for a waiver. In 2008, Congress amended the INA to eliminate the
reference to HIV infection as a health-related ground of inadmissibility.21 And effective January 4,
2010, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of HHS amended its regulations to
remove HIV infection from the definition of a communicable disease of public health
significance.22
Since 1990, the security-related grounds of inadmissibility in the INA have expressly included
terrorism-related grounds. Over the years, the terrorism-related grounds have been amended to
lower the threshold for how substantial, apparent, and immediate an alien’s support for a terrorist
activity or organization may be for the alien to be rendered inadmissible.23 Among the current

(...continued)
2008/112760.htm.
19 Proposed Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2014, p. 12.
20 Certain grounds of inadmissibility, including most security-related grounds, cannot be waived.
21 P.L. 110-293, Title III, §305, July 30, 2008.
22 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Medical Examination
of Aliens—Removal of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection From Definition of Communicable Disease
of Public Health Significance,” 74 Federal Register, pp. 56547-56562, November 2, 2009.
23 See archived CRS Report RL32564, Immigration: Terrorist Grounds for Exclusion and Removal of Aliens, by
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
6

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

terrorism-related grounds, an alien is generally inadmissible for engaging in terrorist activity if he
or she gives any material support, such as a safe house, transportation, communications, or funds,
to a terrorist organization or any of its members or to a person engaged in terrorist activity. The
Secretary of State or the Secretary of DHS, after consultation with the other and the Attorney
General, may exercise discretionary waiver authority over certain terrorism-related grounds of
inadmissibility. Both the Secretary of State and the Secretary of DHS have exercised this waiver
authority with respect to certain categories of individuals.
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, specifies groups that, for purposes of the INA
terrorism-related grounds of inadmissibility, are not to be considered terrorist organizations on the
basis of past acts.24 Thus, a prospective refugee who was a member of, or provided support to,
one of these groups would not be inadmissible on the basis of those actions. More broadly, the
Consolidated Appropriations Act expands the discretionary authority of the Secretary of State and
the Secretary of DHS to grant waivers of the terrorism-related grounds of inadmissibility
generally.
Special Refugee Provisions
Lautenberg Amendment and Specter Amendment
The “Lautenberg Amendment” is a provision of the FY1990 Foreign Operations Appropriations
Act. It requires the Attorney General to designate categories of former Soviet and Indochinese
nationals for whom less evidence is needed to prove refugee status, and provides for adjustment
to permanent resident status of certain Soviet and Indochinese nationals granted parole after being
denied refugee status.25 To be eligible to apply for refugee status under the special provision, an
individual must have close family in the United States. Applicants under the Lautenberg standard
are required to prove that they are members of a protected category with a credible, but not
necessarily individual, fear of persecution. By contrast, the INA requires prospective refugees to
establish a well-founded fear of persecution on an individual basis.
The Lautenberg Amendment has been regularly extended in appropriations acts, although there
have often been gaps between extensions. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2004, in addition
to extending the amendment through FY2004, amended the Lautenberg Amendment to add a new
provision known as the “Specter Amendment.”26 The Specter Amendment requires the
designation of categories of Iranian nationals, specifically religious minorities, for whom less
evidence is needed to prove refugee status. The Consolidated and Further Continuing

(...continued)
Michael John Garcia and Ruth Ellen Wasem.
24 P.L. 110-161, Division J, Title VI, §691, December 26, 2007. DHS and DOS followed this enactment with a series of
Federal Register notices similarly stating that the terrorism-related grounds of inadmissibility would generally be
waived with respect to any assistance provided by an alien to any of the entities expressly exempted by the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, from being deemed terrorist organizations. U.S. Department of Homeland
Security, Office of the Secretary, and Department of State, Office of the Secretary, “Exercise of Authority Under
Section 212(d)(3)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act” [10 separate notices with same title], 73 Federal
Register 34770-34777, June 18, 2008.
25 P.L. 101-167, Title V, §599D and §599E, November 21, 1989. Parole is a temporary authorization to enter the
United States and is typically granted when the alien’s entry is determined to be in the public interest.
26 P.L. 108-199, Division E, Title II, §213, January 23, 2004.
Congressional Research Service
7

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

Appropriations Act, 2015 (P.L. 113-235) extends the Lautenberg Amendment through September
30, 2015.27
Vietnamese Refugees
The “McCain Amendment,” which is no longer in effect, was first enacted in the FY1997
Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act.28 It covered certain adult children, whose parents
were Vietnamese re-education camp survivors and had been accepted for U.S. refugee
resettlement. The amendment made the adult children eligible for U.S. refugee resettlement. It
was subsequently amended and extended through FY1999.
In November 1999, the McCain Amendment was re-enacted in revised form for FY2000 and
FY2001 in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2000.29 As revised, it applied to the adult
children of a re-education camp survivor who was residing in the United States or awaiting
departure from Vietnam and who, after April 1995, was accepted for U.S. refugee resettlement or
for admission as an immediate relative immigrant. The April 1995 date restriction did not apply to
children who were previously denied refugee resettlement because their documents did not show
continuous co-residency with their parent.
Legislation to amend and extend the provision through FY2003 was approved by the 107th
Congress in May 2002.30 This law eliminated the existing April 1995 date restriction. Thus,
children who were previously denied refugee resettlement for reasons other than co-residency
could also have their cases reconsidered. This revised provision, which was regularly extended,31
is sometimes referred to as the “McCain-Davis Amendment.” The McCain-Davis Amendment
was last extended, through FY2010, by the Omnibus Appropriations Act, 2009.32 This extension
was repealed, however, by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010.33
Refugee Resettlement Assistance
The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement (HHS/ORR),
within the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), administers an initial transitional
assistance program for temporarily dependent refugees, Cuban/Haitian entrants, and other
specified groups. Since its establishment in 1980, the refugee resettlement program has been
justified on the grounds that the admission of refugees is a federal decision, entailing some
federal responsibility. Unlike immigrants who enter through family or employment ties, refugees
are admitted on humanitarian grounds, and there is no requirement that they demonstrate
economic self-sufficiency.

27 P.L. 113-235, Div. J, §7034(l)(8), December 16, 2014.
28 Section 584 of P.L. 104-208, Division A, Section 101(c), September 30, 1996.
29 P.L. 106-113, Appendix G, Division A, §255, November 29, 1999.
30 P.L. 107-185, May 30, 2002.
31 It was extended by P.L. 108-447, P.L. 109-102, and P.L. 110-161.
32 P.L. 111-8, Division H, §7034(d), March 11, 2009.
33 P.L. 111-117, Division F, §7034(d).
Congressional Research Service
8

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

For FY2015, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, provides
$1,559,884,000 for ORR programs. Table 2 details refugee resettlement funding for FY2006-
FY2015.
Table 2. Refugee Resettlement Funding, FY2006-FY2015
(budget authority in millions of dollars)
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
Programs
Actual Enacted Enacteda Estimate Enacted Enacted Actual Enacted
Actual
Enacted
Transitional/Cash
and Medical
Services
$265.4 $265.5 $301.3 $282.3 $353.3 $352.6
$323.2 $401.1 $391.5 $383.3
Victims of
Traffickingb

9.8 9.8 10.0 9.8 9.8 9.8
9.8 9.3 13.8 15.8
Social Services
153.9 154.0 156.7 154.0 154.0 153.7
124.3 149.9 149.9 149.9
Victims of
Torturec
9.8 9.8 10.0 10.8 11.1 11.1
11.0 10.7 10.7 10.7
Preventive
Health
4.7 4.7 4.8 4.7 4,7 4,7
4,7 4.6 4.6 4.6
Targeted
Assistance
48.6 48.6 49.5 48.6 48.6 48.5
28.1 47.6 47.6 47.6
Unaccompanied
Alien Childrend
77.2
95.3
135.0
123.1
149.4
149.1
267.2
376.1
911.8
948.0
Totale
$569.4 $587.8 $667.3 $633.4 $730.9 $729.5
$768.3 $999.4
$1,529.9
$1,559.9
Sources: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Justifications
of Estimates for Appropriations Committees, FY2005-FY2016; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Administration for Children and Families, ACF All-Purpose Table, 2005-2007, 2012-2013; U.S. Congress,
Conference Committees, Departments of Transportation and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, 2010, conference report to accompany H.R. 3288, 111th Cong., 1st sess., H.Rept. 111-366,
Labor-Health and Human Services-Education funding table, p. 1292; “Explanatory Statement Submitted by Mr.
Rogers of Kentucky, Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriations Regarding the House Amendment to
the Senate Amendment on H.R. 83,” Labor-Health and Human Services-Education funding table, Congressional
Record, daily edition, vol. 160 (December 11, 2014), p. 9874.
a. Amounts do not reflect rescission.
b. Funding used primarily for administrative cost of certifying that an alien is a trafficking victim for purposes of
receiving benefits and services.
c. Funding used for rehabilitation services, social services, and legal services for torture victims and for
provision of research and training to health care providers.
d. Program serves children under age 18 who do not have lawful immigration status and do not have a parent
or legal guardian in the United States available to provide physical custody and care.
e. Sum of amounts may not equal total due to rounding.
ORR-funded refugee assistance activities include refugee cash and medical assistance, social
services to help refugees become socially and economically self-sufficient, and targeted
assistance for impacted areas. Special refugee cash assistance (RCA) and refugee medical
assistance (RMA) are the heart of the refugee program, accounting for a greater portion of the
Congressional Research Service
9

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

ORR annual budget than any other activity for refugees (see Table 2).34 RCA and RMA, which in
most cases are administered by states, are intended to help needy refugees who are ineligible to
receive benefits from mainstream federal assistance programs. RCA and RMA are currently
available to refugees for eight months after entry.35 RMA benefits are based on the state’s
Medicaid program, and RCA payments are now based on the state’s Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families (TANF) payment to a family unit of the same size.36
The ORR program was significantly affected by the 1996 welfare reform act and subsequent
amendments.37 Prior to this legislation, refugees who otherwise met the requirements of federal
public assistance programs were immediately and indefinitely eligible to participate in them just
like U.S. citizens. Now, refugees and other specified humanitarian entrants are subject to time
limits. Table 3 summarizes the time limits on refugee eligibility for four major public assistance
programs.
Table 3. Refugee Eligibility for Major Federal Public Assistance Programs
Program Eligibility
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for the Aged,
Eligible for seven years after entry.a
Blind and Disabled
Medicaid (non-emergency care)
Eligible for seven years after entry, then state
option.
TANF
Eligible for five years after entry, then state
option.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (formerly,
Eligible without time limits.
Food Stamps)
a. A temporary provision (in P.L. 110-328, September 30, 2008) extended to nine years (during FY2009
through FY2011) the period of eligibility of certain refugees and others for SSI benefits, provided that
specified criteria were met.

34 Although the unaccompanied alien children (UAC) program is under ORR, it is not a program for refugees. See table
notes accompanying Table 2. The separate unaccompanied refugee minors program serves refugee children in the
United States who do not have a parent or other relative available to provide care; it is funded through the
transitional/cash and medical services program.
35 INA §412(e)(1) authorizes ORR to reimburse states for RCA and RMA for 36 months. Initially, beginning in April
1980, RCA and RMA were available for the full 36 months. As appropriations levels decreased in subsequent years,
however, the period of coverage was reduced. Since October 1991, RCA and RMA have been available to needy
refugees for eight months after entry.
36 For additional discussion of ORR assistance, see archived CRS Report R41570, U.S. Refugee Resettlement
Assistance, by Andorra Bruno.
37 The 1996 welfare reform law is the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, P.L. 104-193,
August 22, 1996.
Congressional Research Service
10

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

Appendix. Refugee Admissions by Region,
FY1987-FY2014
Former
Latin
East
Eastern
Soviet
America/
Near East/
FY Africa Asia
Europe
Union
Caribbean
South Asia
Total
1987
1,990 40,099 8,396 3,699
323 10,021 64,528
1988 1,593
35,371
7,510
20,411
3,230a 8,368
76,483
1989 1,902
45,722
8,752
39,602
4,116a 6,976a
107,070
1990 3,453
51,604a 6,094 50,628 5,308a 4,979
122,066
1991 4,420
53,522
6,837
39,226
4,042a 5,342
113,389
1992 5,470
51,899
2,915
61,397
3,947a 6,903
132,531
1993 6,967
49,817
2,582
48,773
4,322a 6,987
119,448
1994
5,860 43,564 7,707 43,854 6,156 5,840
112,981
1995
4,827 36,987 10,070 35,951 7,629 4,510
99,974
1996
7,604 19,321 12,145 29,816 3,550 3,967
76,403
1997
6,065 8,594 21,401 27,331 2,996 4,101
70,488
1998
6,887 10,854 30,842 23,557 1,627 3,313
77,080
1999 13,043 10,206 38,658 17,410 2,110 4,098
85,525
2000 17,561 4,561 22,561 15,103 3,232 10,129
73,147
2001 19,020 4,163 15,794 15,978 2,975 11,956
69,886
2002
2,551 3,512 5,459 9,969 1,934 3,706
27,131
2003 10,714 1,724 2,506 8,744 455 4,260
28,403
2004 29,104
8,084
9,254b
3,577 2,854
52,873
2005 20,745
12,076
11,316b
6,699 2,977
53,813
2006 18,126
5,659
10,456b
3,264 3,718
41,223
2007 17,483
15,643
4,560b
2,976 7,620
48,282
2008 8,935
19,489
2,343b
4,277
25,147
60,191
2009 9,670
19,850
1,997b
4,857
38,280
74,654
2010 13,305
17,716
1,526b
4,982
35,782
73,311
2011 7,685
17,367
1,228b
2,976
27,168
56,424
2012 10,608
14,366
1,129b
2,078
30,057
58,238
2013
15,980 16,537
580
4,439 32,391 69,927
2014
17,476 14,784
959
4,318 32,450 69,987
Source: U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration.
Notes: Data for FY1987-FY2000 are as of June 30, 2002. Data for FY2001-FY2013 are as of January 31, 2014.
Data for FY2014 are as of December 31, 2014.
a. Includes refugees admitted under the Private Sector Initiative (PSI), most of whom were Cuban.
Congressional Research Service
11

---

Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Policy

b. Beginning in FY2004, the categories of Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union were combined into a
single category, Europe and Central Asia. These are the total admissions under that category.

Author Contact Information

Andorra Bruno

Specialist in Immigration Policy
abruno@crs.loc.gov, 7-7865


Congressional Research Service
12

---