The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Curt Tarnoff
Specialist in Foreign Affairs
December 23, 2014
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
RS21168
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Summary
Founded in 1961, the Peace Corps has sought to meet its legislative mandate of promoting world
peace and friendship by sending American volunteers to serve at the grassroots level in villages
and towns in all corners of the globe. As of end September 2014, about 6,818 volunteers were
serving in 64 nations.
In 2015, the 114th Congress will consider the President’s annual funding request for the Peace
Corps, changes to the Peace Corps authorization legislation, and related issues.
On March 4, 2014, the Administration issued its FY2015 budget request, proposing $380 million
for the Peace Corps, $1 million more than the FY2014 level approved in the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2014 (P.L. 113-76, H.R. 3547). On June 27, 2014, the House Appropriations
Committee reported H.R. 5013, the FY2015 State, Foreign Operations appropriations, providing
$379 million for the Peace Corps. On June 19, 2014, the Senate Appropriations Committee
reported S. 2499, the FY2015 State, Foreign Operations appropriations, providing $380 million
for the Peace Corps. On December 16, 2014, the President signed into law H.R. 83 (P.L. 113-
235), the Consolidated and Continuing Appropriations Act, FY2015, providing the Peace Corps
with $379.5 million in FY2015, $0.5 million more than the FY2014 level.
The last Peace Corps funding authorization (P.L. 106-30), approved in 1999, covered the years
FY2000 to FY2003. Authorization legislation offered in the 112th Congress in both the House
(H.R. 2583) and Senate (S. 1426) failed to receive floor action.
On November 21, 2011, the Kate Puzey Peace Corps Volunteer Protection Act of 2011 was signed
into law (P.L. 112-57). It put into place a number of safeguards to address and reduce the
incidence of volunteer rape and sexual abuse.
A comprehensive assessment of Peace Corps operations was published in June 2010. It made 64
recommendations supporting a six-point strategy that was adopted by the agency and has guided
agency actions since then. In March 2014, the Peace Corps published its strategic plan for the
years FY2014 through FY2018. It contains strategic objectives and performance goals associated
with them that will also guide the agency in the next few years.
Current issues include the extent to which there is available funding for Peace Corps expansion,
whether volunteers are able to function in a safe and secure environment, volunteer access to
abortion, and other issues.
Congressional Research Service
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Contents
Recent Developments ...................................................................................................................... 1
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Congressional Actions ..................................................................................................................... 2
FY2015 Appropriations ............................................................................................................. 2
Authorization Legislation .......................................................................................................... 2
Peace Corps Policy and Administration ........................................................................................... 3
Comprehensive Assessment ...................................................................................................... 3
Strategic Plan: FY2014-FY2018 ............................................................................................... 6
Issues................................................................................................................................................ 7
Budget and Expansion ............................................................................................................... 7
Volunteers, Programming, and Support ..................................................................................... 8
The Volunteer Force ............................................................................................................ 8
Programming and Support .................................................................................................. 9
Safety and Security .................................................................................................................. 10
Peace Corps Inspector General Report .............................................................................. 10
The Peace Corps Response to the 20/20 Stories and Victims’ Charges............................. 11
Processes to Address Safety and Security ......................................................................... 12
Legislation on Safety and Security .................................................................................... 13
Instability, Terrorism, and Evacuations ............................................................................. 14
Volunteer Access to Abortion .................................................................................................. 15
The Five-Year Rule.................................................................................................................. 16
Tables
Table 1. Peace Corps Budget: FY2004-FY2015 .............................................................................. 7
Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 17
Congressional Research Service
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Recent Developments
On December 16, 2014, the President signed into law H.R. 83 (P.L. 113-235), the Consolidated
and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, providing the Peace Corps with $379.5 million
in FY2015, $0.5 million more than the FY2014 level. The legislation includes new appropriations
language that would apply the same abortion restrictions to volunteer health care insurance as
currently apply to federal employee health plans, allowing for exceptions in the case of rape,
incest, or endangerment to the life of the mother. However, as appropriations language, this
provision would apply only to FY2015 funding.
In July 2014, the Peace Corps evacuated over 300 volunteers from Liberia, Sierra Leone, and
Guinea due to concerns regarding the Ebola virus.
Introduction
Generally viewed positively by the public and widely supported in Congress, the Peace Corps is
the U.S. agency that provides volunteer skills internationally. In 2015, the 114th Congress will
consider the President’s FY2016 funding request for the Peace Corps, changes to the Peace Corps
authorization legislation, and related issues. This report will be updated as events warrant.
Background
Founded in 1961, the Peace Corps sends American volunteers to serve at the grassroots level in
villages and towns across the globe to meet its three-point legislative mandate of promoting world
peace and friendship by improving the lives of those they serve, helping others understand
American culture, and sharing their experience with Americans back home. To date, more than
215,000 Peace Corps volunteers have served in 139 countries. As of the end of September 2014,
6,818 volunteers were serving in 64 nations.1 Carrie Hessler-Radelet is the current Director of the
Peace Corps.
In addition to its basic two-year tour of duty, the Peace Corps introduced in 1996 an initiative
called Peace Corps Response (formerly Crisis Corps). Drawing on former volunteers and
expanded in 2012 to include those who have never been Peace Corps volunteers, this program
provides short-term (usually three to six months) emergency, humanitarian, and development
assistance at the community level with nongovernmental relief and development organizations.2
More than 2,100 Peace Corps Response volunteers have served in 50 countries, including post-
tsunami Thailand and Sri Lanka and post-earthquake Haiti. At the end of FY2014, there were 188
Peace Corps Response volunteers in 35 countries.
1 Supporting Peace Corps operations are about 1,077 U.S. direct hire staff, 182 of whom are overseas, and about 2,100
locally hired employees at overseas locations (data as of August 2014 provided by Peace Corps).
2 According to a “former” volunteer, Peace Corps volunteers are never “former” volunteers, but always “returned”
volunteers, as even at completion of overseas service, they are still responsible for achieving the Third Goal of sharing
their experience with Americans back home. Targeting a nonvolunteer audience, however, this report refers to such
volunteers as “former” volunteers.
Congressional Research Service
1
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Congressional Actions
FY2015 Appropriations
On March 4, 2014, the Administration issued its FY2015 budget request, proposing $380 million
for the Peace Corps, $1 million more than it received in FY2014.
On June 27, 2014, the House Appropriations Committee reported H.R. 5013, the FY2015 State,
Foreign Operations appropriations, providing $379 million for the Peace Corps, $1 million less
than the Administration request and the same amount appropriated in FY2014. On June 19, 2014,
the Senate Appropriations Committee reported S. 2499, the FY2015 State, Foreign Operations
appropriations, providing $380 million for the Peace Corps and matching the Administration
request and the amount appropriated in FY2014. Both House and Senate Appropriations
Committee bills would allow exceptions to the prohibition on funding abortions in the case of
rape, incest, or endangerment to the life of the mother.
On December 16, 2014, the President signed into law H.R. 83 (P.L. 113-235), the Consolidated
and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, providing the Peace Corps with $379.5 million
in FY2015, $0.5 million more than the FY2014 level. The legislation includes new appropriations
language that would apply the same abortion restrictions to volunteer health care insurance as
currently apply to federal employee health plans, allowing for exceptions in the case of rape,
incest, or endangerment to the life of the mother. However, as appropriations language, this
provision would apply only to FY2015 funding.
Authorization Legislation
Despite repeated efforts during the past decade, Congress has not enacted a new Peace Corps
funding authorization. The last such Peace Corps authorization (P.L. 106-30), approved in 1999,
covered the years FY2000 to FY2003. Appropriations bills, however, routinely waive the
requirement of authorization of appropriations for foreign aid programs, as the Consolidated and
Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (P.L. 113-235, Division J, §7022) did in the case of
FY2015 unauthorized foreign aid program appropriations, including those for Peace Corps.
Both House and Senate took action in 2011 to authorize funding levels for the Peace Corps.
Neither bill, S. 1426 or H.R. 2583, saw floor action. In 2011, Congress also took a number of
steps to address Peace Corps volunteer safety and security concerns in authorization measures.
The Kate Puzey Peace Corps Volunteer Protection Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-57, S. 1280) was signed
into law on November 21, 2011. This bill is discussed in the “Safety and Security” section below.
No major Peace Corps funding or program legislation was enacted in 2012 or 2013.
In June 2013 and January 2014, the Senate and House, respectively, approved legislation (S. 230)
authorizing the Peace Corps Commemorative Foundation to establish a work in Washington, DC,
commemorating the mission of the Peace Corps. The President signed it into law (P.L. 113-78) on
January 24, 2014.
On May 6, 2014, the Peace Corps Equity Act of 2014 was introduced by Representative Lowey in
the House (H.R. 4578) and by Senator Shaheen in the Senate (S. 2291). It would amend the Peace
Corps Act to apply the same abortion restrictions to volunteer health care insurance as currently
Congressional Research Service
2
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
apply to federal employee health plans, allowing for exceptions in the case of rape, incest, or
endangerment to the life of the mother. While it did not achieve passage in the 113th Congress, the
FY2015 appropriations contains a provision that accomplishes the same end for that fiscal year
alone. See “Volunteer Access to Abortion” below for further discussion.
Peace Corps Policy and Administration
Comprehensive Assessment
In June 2010, the Peace Corps submitted to Congress a “comprehensive agency assessment” in
response to a directive included in the FY2010 State, Foreign Operations appropriations (P.L.
111-117, Division F).3 As requested by the conferees (H.Rept. 111-366), the 204-page document
specifically addressed a range of issues of concern to Congress regarding Peace Corps operations
and procedures. While the report was thorough in its treatment of these issues, it should be noted
that some points on which Congress had expressed an interest in recent years were not requested
to be substantively addressed in the report. The report did not address such issues as safety and
security, deferment of student loans, utilization of information technology, mechanisms for
soliciting volunteer views, the adequacy and impact of post-service benefits, and the
accomplishments and plans of the Peace Corps Response Program.
The assessment report’s 64 recommendations were a blueprint for change in the agency. As a
result of the assessment team’s findings, the Peace Corps adopted a strategy that has guided its
operations since 2010. Some key elements of this reform program are noted below.
Country selection. The Peace Corps moved to rationalize its selection of host countries by
establishing clear criteria for entry. In part, this effort sought to address congressional concerns
that the selection of Peace Corps host countries may not sufficiently reflect U.S. interests. From
2002 to 2010, the Peace Corps received letters of request or inquiry from 27 countries where
there was no current program. How the agency determined whether to establish a program had
not been a transparent and well-documented process, leading some to conclude that it was not a
rational process. The assessment team found that certain essential conditions had always been
applied to the question of country entry—the extent of host country commitment, the safety and
security of volunteers, and the level of resources available to the Peace Corps. Other key
considerations had included compatibility of country objectives with those of Peace Corps,
presence of potential projects, cost effectiveness, and congruence with U.S. national interests.
The assessment team recommended that the Peace Corps conduct a formal annual portfolio
review that would look not just at applicant countries but at all existing programs and apply
specific criteria to judge where the agency should operate. In addition to existing criteria, the
team recommended that two new criteria be introduced into deliberations on country entry and
termination—a measure of the level of development, such as the U.N. Development Program’s
Human Development Index, and a measure of potential volunteer impact. Since 2010, portfolio
reviews have become an annual practice, informing the agency’s strategic planning and budget
guidance to country posts for the next year. These reviews helped lead to decisions to increase
3 The report can be found at http://files.peacecorps.gov/multimedia/pdf/opengov/
PC_Comprehensive_Agency_Assessment.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
3
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
volunteer numbers in Africa and close programs in Antigua/Barbuda, Bulgaria, Cape Verde,
Romania, St. Kitts/Nevis, Suriname, Honduras, and Turkmenistan in FY2013. The Palau program
will close in FY2014. A new program is anticipated in Kosovo. Currently, there are 25
outstanding country requests for new programs.
Volunteer skill composition: generalists. In its new strategy, the Peace Corps chose to recognize
and make the best use of one of its most notable characteristics—a volunteer force composed
largely of generalists. In 2010, as for much of its history, about 85% of volunteers were recent
college graduates and 84% under the age of 30. While some have argued that the Peace Corps
should alter its composition to meet the increasing needs of developing countries for educated
specialists, the assessment team determined, with some exceptions noted below, to accept
demographic reality and the constraints of career paths in the United States that would likely limit
the number of older specialists available to it. Instead, the team recommended steps be taken to
strengthen the quality of the volunteer force available by improving its technical, language, and
cultural training. It called for hiring full-time training staff at country posts and providing more
training time to volunteers. In response, the Peace Corps increased pre-service training by about
one week in FY2011 compared to FY2009.
Volunteer project focus. The new strategy suggested that, in order to maximize the effectiveness
of the large pool of generalists recruited by the Peace Corps, it would be best to focus on a more
limited range of project areas. In the period leading up to the report, volunteers were assigned to
one of six broad technical sectors—education, health, agriculture, environment, youth
development, and business/IT. Within those sectors, volunteers worked in 50 different technical
programs, from which 211 different project plans had been developed, perhaps meeting specific
needs in a developing country, but for each of which volunteers in that project had to be trained.
The assessment team argued that by focusing more on what volunteers do best, what communities
most want, and what volunteers can best be trained to do, the agency could maximize the capacity
of volunteers and the impact they may have. The recommendation, therefore, was that Peace
Corps management assess and determine a more narrow framework of work assignments and
strengthen technical training in those areas—a so-called Focus in/Train up strategy. However, the
assessment did not suggest which technical sectors or program areas should be eliminated or
maintained. After the report was issued, an agency workshop proposed reducing the number of
projects from 211 to 60. The agency is reportedly on track to reduce the number to 161 by
FY2014.4 The Peace Corps has identified 57 project activity areas within the six technical sectors
on which to concentrate resources and identify performance indicators by which to judge results.
It has developed 126 volunteer training packages based on best practices along with guidance to
field staff on implementing effective training.
Volunteer skill composition: specialists. The assessment addressed the exception to the rule of
use of generalists. Both to meet needs of countries that might require greater expertise and
experience and to best attract and utilize those volunteer applicants that possess a higher level of
skills than the norm, the assessment team recommended that some innovations be made in Peace
Corps programs. Meeting report recommendations, the Peace Corps Response Program more than
doubled in size and was opened to highly qualified individuals without previous Peace Corps
experience. The Response Program has maintained its current flexible time commitments (i.e.,
less than the usual 27 months for regular volunteers) and is being used in both regular Peace
4 USAID Inspector General, Statement on the Peace Corps’ Management and Performance Challenges, November 27,
2013, p. 140.
Congressional Research Service
4
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Corps countries as well as in countries where there is no standard Peace Corps presence. Under
the Response Program, a Global Health Services Partnership was established to recruit physicians
and nurses as adjunct faculty in medical and schools in developing countries—the first such
volunteers were posted to Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda in July 2013.
Volunteer recruitment. As part of the strategy’s support for efforts to better meet developing
country volunteer needs and attract the best volunteer candidates, the agency has sought to
improve its recruitment and placement process and strengthen diversity outreach. A new online
application platform was launched in 2012, and a new medical review management system was
established to facilitate medical clearance.
“Third goal.” The strategy called for efforts to more fully and effectively address the so-called
“third goal,” the legislative mandate that Peace Corps volunteers “help promote a better
understanding of other peoples on the part of Americans” (Peace Corps Act, P.L. 87-293, §2).
This objective has always received less attention and funding (0.4% of the FY2012 budget) than
the other two goals of assisting development and promoting understanding of Americans to the
people served, both aspects which focus on the agency’s work abroad. In 2010, the “third goal”
was singled out by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in its report on the Peace Corps
Improvement and Expansion Act (S. 1382, and incorporated into S. 2971) as an area that had not
received enough priority. “Third goal” activities include efforts by volunteers and former
volunteers, sometimes forming country member groups, to convey their experiences through
blogs, public talks, community service in the United States, and charitable fundraising. Most
prominent among agency-sponsored activities is the Paul D. Coverdell World Wise Schools
program, which connects volunteers with school classrooms throughout the United States. The
assessment report recommendations included increasing funding for these purposes; establishing
an intern program that would place exceptional volunteers in international NGOs, business, and
U.S. agencies; and developing an agency-wide strategy to achieve “third goal” objectives.
Since the report was published, the agency established an Office of Third Goal and Returned
Volunteer Services. It has encouraged greater participation by volunteers and former volunteers;
in 2013, hundreds of returned volunteers spoke at schools in their communities. The number of
schools participating in third goal activities has risen significantly in recent years, by nearly 200%
between FY2009 and FY2013, 126% since FY2012 alone.5 Although third goal funding stood at
$1.5 million in each year since FY2010, the FY2014 request at $1.8 million represents a 20%
increase from the FY2012 $1.5 million level.
Management and operations. In addition to policy decisions encompassed by the report, the
assessment called for strengthening of Peace Corps management and operations. It recommended
updating the agency’s strategic plan to include the new strategies in the assessment report and a
wide range of improvements to the planning and budgeting process, staffing, evaluation and
oversight, recruitment procedures, training, and provision of health care to volunteers. Since the
report was issued, a new monitoring and evaluation policy for the whole agency has been
developed, including agency-wide standard indicators to allow reporting on common results
across projects and countries. Efforts are being made to build new partnerships with international
organizations, U.S. government agencies, and others. In September 2012, the Peace Corps
established its first global partnership with a corporation, Mondelez (formerly Kraft Foods), to
support agriculture and community development. In an effort to strengthen volunteer medical
5 Peace Corps, Performance and Accountability Report FY2013, p. 55.
Congressional Research Service
5
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
care, new Regional Medical Officers were hired and a Quality Improvement Council was
established. To increase staff effectiveness, Peace Corps instituted a reorganization of country
desk positions, a results-oriented performance appraisal program, and a revision of tour lengths to
five years from the original 30 months. A number of changes have also been made to safety and
security operations (discussed under “Safety and Security” below).
Congressional reaction to the assessment report and strategy. In its report accompanying the
FY2011 State, Foreign Operations Appropriations (S.Rept. 111-237), the Senate Appropriations
Committee noted support for several of the assessment report’s recommendations, including
incorporating U.S. national interests and budget considerations into new criteria for volunteer
placement, focusing resources on key areas, and attracting a wider diversity of highly skilled
volunteers by establishing new technical programs through an expanded Peace Corps Response
Program. The Kate Puzey Peace Corps Volunteer Protection Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-57) amended
the Peace Corps Act to add a section requiring annual portfolio reviews and monitoring and
evaluation processes such as those that came out of the assessment.
Strategic Plan: FY2014-FY2018
In March 2014, the Peace Corps issued its strategic plan for the period FY2014 through FY2018.6
The plan poses 11 strategic objectives meant to further the agency’s three long-standing
legislative goals of improving the lives of those they serve, helping others understand American
culture, and sharing their experience with Americans back home. In many ways, the objectives
are a continuation of reform efforts established in the comprehensive assessment exercise. For
instance, under the objective of making Peace Corps the “service opportunity of choice” for
Americans, the agency addresses recruitment challenges by proposing to fully meet post requests
for volunteers, increase applications to the Peace Corps, and reduce the time it takes to go from
application to acceptance. The objective of “train up” continues efforts to improve training,
especially language and technical training.
The plan also introduces some new elements of emphasis in agency management. The objective
of “advancing community-based development outcomes” commits Peace Corps to strengthen and
document the connection between volunteer projects and developmental gains. Under the
objective of “site development,” the agency promises to focus on the sometimes neglected
importance of establishing worthwhile projects and a work environment appropriate for
volunteers. “Measurement for results” denotes an agency effort to ascertain levels of progress and
performance through improved monitoring and evaluation practices, including collection of high-
quality data. Each new objective has associated with it several performance goals with identified
measures of progress in achieving them, the results of which will be published in the years to
come.
6 Published in its FY2015 Congressional Budget Justification document. Available at http://www.peacecorps.gov/
about/open/documents/.
Congressional Research Service
6
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Issues
Budget and Expansion
In 1985, Congress made it the policy of the United States to maintain “consistent with
programmatic and fiscal considerations,” a Peace Corps volunteer level of at least 10,000
individuals.7 Such numbers had not been reached since the 1960s, and, although the objective has
been reiterated by three Presidents since 1985—Clinton (1998), Bush (2002), and Obama
(2010)—Congress has not provided the necessary funding.
Table 1. Peace Corps Budget: FY2004-FY2015
Fiscal
Year
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Request
($
mil)
359.0 401.0 345.0 336.7 333.5 343.5 373.4 446.2 439.6 374.5 378.8 380.0
Appropriation
308.2 317.4 319.9 319.7 330.8 340.0 400.0 374.3 375.0 356.0 379.0 379.5
($ mil.)
Total
Volunteers
7,733 7,810 7,749 8,079 7,876 7,671 8,655 9,095 8,073 7,209 6,818
Sources: Peace Corps and CRS.
Notes: Figures reflect across-the-board rescissions and supplemental appropriations; they do not count
transfers. Total volunteers are number at end of the fiscal year. Volunteer numbers include those funded by both
Peace Corps appropriations as well as transfers from other agencies, such as the State Department President’s
Emergency Program for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). In FY2013, 801 volunteers were funded by PEPFAR with a
transfer of $36.4 million.
Although there appears to be broad support for the agency, when considering proposed funding
increases, Congress has had to weigh whether sufficient funds were available vis-à-vis other
foreign aid priorities to warrant appropriating the amounts sought for the Peace Corps. Despite a
2002 expansion initiative by President Bush to double its size to about 14,000 volunteers within
five years, the Peace Corps saw only a 16% increase in volunteer numbers between 2002 and
2009. In early 2010, the Obama Administration proposed a more modest objective of a 9,400-
volunteer force by 2012 and 11,000 by 2016. Annual incremental funding increases and a
significant congressional bump-up in FY2010 funding helped lead to an FY2010 volunteer level
of 8,655, a 13% increase from the previous year and the highest level since 1970. At end of
September 2011, volunteer numbers reached 9,095.
Since then, Peace Corps appropriations budgets have retreated and the volunteer level dropped to
8,073 in FY2012, an 11% decline from the previous year, and 7,209 in FY2013, a further 11%
decline. The FY2014 level is 6,818, a 5% decline from FY2013. Nevertheless, the Peace Corps
FY2014 to FY2018 strategic plan calls for a 10,000 volunteer level by FY2018.
7 Peace Corps Act (P.L. 87-293), as amended, Section 2(b). The section was added by Section 1102(a) of the
International Security and Development Cooperation Act of 1985 (P.L. 99-83).
Congressional Research Service
7
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Volunteers, Programming, and Support
A continual concern for Congress over the years has been Peace Corps management, including
how the Peace Corps addresses the make-up of the volunteer force, programming of volunteer
project assignments, and support of volunteers in implementing those projects. This concern is
particularly acute in the context of expansion efforts, as it was used as an argument by Congress
for not meeting the George W. Bush Administration’s funding requests that would enable
doubling the size of the agency. The 2009 House Appropriations Committee report on the
FY2010 State, Foreign Operations appropriations (H.Rept. 111-187) asked the Peace Corps to
review its management practices in order to accommodate larger numbers of volunteers, and the
Senate’s Peace Corps Improvement and Expansion Act of 2009 (S. 1382) similarly aimed to
ensure that the Peace Corps was prepared to deal with the whole range of management issues
such an expansion would entail. As noted above, the FY2010 Consolidated Appropriations Act
(P.L. 111-117, Division F) required the Peace Corps to submit a report assessing its operational
model and proposing a strategy for reform. Peace Corps has implemented those reforms since
2010.
The Volunteer Force
The volunteer force is the Peace Corps. Aspects of its composition have been a focus of interest in
Congress over the years.8 In FY2014, 63% of volunteers were women, 25% were minorities, 94%
were single, and the average age was 28.9
In the past several years, Peace Corps made an objective of increasing the number of volunteers
aged 50 and older, which, some would argue, might lead to a more specialized work-experienced
volunteer force. However, the proportion of volunteers aged 50 or over appears to have changed
in a positive direction only slightly. In FY2014, 7% of volunteers were 50 or older, compared
with 5% in FY2008 (the number of older applicants represented 6.67% of applicants in FY2012).
Volunteers work in a range of sectors—in FY2014, 38% in education, 24% in health and
HIV/AIDS, 12% in the environment, 9% in community economic development, 9% in youth, 5%
in agriculture, and 3% in Peace Corps Response activities. According to the June 2010 assessment
report, 85% of volunteers were recent college graduates with little professional experience. The
Peace Corps, while adept at recruiting generalists and providing them with sufficient training to
carry out useful assignments in these fields, has not emphasized the provision of highly skilled
professionals, such as doctors, agronomists, or engineers, which, many argue, more accurately
reflects the current needs of developing countries and which the agency might be under greater
pressure to supply if it intends to expand volunteer numbers.10 Weighed against this view is the
belief that the Peace Corps is an agency of public diplomacy as much as it is a development
organization, and personal interaction and demonstration of U.S. values is as important as
providing specialized technical expertise.
8 Data in this section are drawn from the Peace Corps Fact Sheet, CRS communications with Peace Corps, and the
FY2013 Peace Corps Performance and Accountability Report.
9 In FY2014, Peace Corps volunteers were 7% African American, 5% Asian American, and 10% Hispanic/Latino
origin.
10 One exception was its Mexico program, launched in 2004, where the Peace Corps was able to provide specialized
technical volunteers offering skills in water and environmental engineering.
Congressional Research Service
8
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
As noted earlier, the 2010 assessment team recommended that the Peace Corps accept the
demographic features that have long characterized the volunteer force and, while embracing the
use of generalists, seek to strengthen their capabilities through better training and more focused
sector activities. At the same time, the team recommended continued efforts to utilize experienced
and skilled volunteers through innovative approaches. In particular, it suggested that the Peace
Corps Response Program be used as a platform for new, more flexible, programs that may
accommodate different types of volunteers. The new Global Health Services Partnership
providing doctors and nurses is one result.
Whatever the skill sets and demographic characteristics sought by the agency, it is the recruitment
of volunteers with appropriate skills and willingness to live in unfamiliar and sometimes
uncomfortable conditions that is essential to the overall mission of the Peace Corps. A substantial
spike in applicants and those expressing interest in applying since September 11, 2001, made it
easier for the Peace Corps to meet its recruitment goals. In FY2009, 15,386 applied to be
volunteers compared with 8,897 in FY2001. More recently, however, application volume
declined. In FY2011, 12,206 applied to be volunteers, and in FY2013, 10,131. Following a
significant change in the application process in 2014—introduction of a shorter form and
applicant ability to choose their country and sector of service—the number of applications rose to
a 22-year record high of 17,336.
Programming and Support
The Peace Corps has been criticized in the past for providing inadequate programming and
support of volunteers. This view was reflected in a 1990 Government Accountability Office
(GAO) investigation.11 It noted that some volunteers had little or nothing to do or had spent six or
more months developing their own assignments, without benefit of site visits by Peace Corps
staff. The GAO attributed the programming problem to a failure of planning, evaluation, and
monitoring systems. Since then, the Peace Corps has addressed these weaknesses with systematic
approaches to project development, annual project reviews, and increased opportunities for site
visits and volunteer feedback. While most volunteers do rate their overall experience highly,
volunteer anecdotal accounts suggest poor programming and staff support still occur. The 2013
volunteer survey found that 26% and 18% of volunteers were dissatisfied or only minimally
satisfied with regard to support received from Peace Corps staff in site selection and job
assignment respectively, and recurrent problems identified in Inspector General country program
evaluations are site development, volunteer training, and coordination with country ministries and
project partners.12 One sign of volunteer dissatisfaction—the resignation rate—has improved in
recent years, with 4.7% resigning in FY2013 versus 5.3% resigning in FY2012, and 6.0% in
FY2011—each a significant improvement over the 9.8% level back in FY2001.13
The 2010 assessment report discussed but did not thoroughly explore causes of volunteer
dissatisfaction and resignation, noting that 97 recommendations to reduce it had been made in
previous studies since 1969, many of which had been adopted. It also did not address questions
regarding the quality of volunteer assignments. However, the report did offer possible avenues
11 Peace Corps: Meeting the Challenges of the 1990s, May 1990, NSIAD-90-122.
12 Peace Corps, 2013 Annual Volunteer Survey Results, p. 33; Peace Corps Office of Inspector General, Recurring
Issues: OIG Post Audits and Evaluations Fiscal Years 2009-2011, April 2012, p. 6.
13 “A resignation is a decision made by the volunteer and trainee who no longer wish to continue in the Peace Corps.”
Assessment Report, pp. 171-172; Peace Corps, FY2013 Early Termination Report, January 2014.
Congressional Research Service
9
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
that might help correct these concerns, such as improving volunteer and staff training, developing
initiatives to better utilize skilled and experienced volunteers, encouraging third-year extensions,
and strengthening program evaluation and oversight. The agency has adopted reforms in all these
areas.14
Safety and Security
The safety and security of volunteers has long been a prime concern of the Peace Corps. Because
of where they live and work, Peace Corps volunteers appear to many Americans to be especially
vulnerable to crime. The threat of anti-American terrorism in the years following the terrorist
attacks on September 11, 2001, has increased that perception. Fears were further raised in 2003
when the Dayton (Ohio) Daily News ran a series of reports suggesting that the Peace Corps was
failing in its obligation to provide adequate security; a congressional hearing was held and
legislation was approved by the House (H.R. 4060, June 2004) that sought to address this
concern.15
In January 2010, the issue of safety and security received renewed public attention due to two
reports on the ABC television newsmagazine 20/20, one concerning the 2009 murder of volunteer
Kate Puzey in Benin and the other addressing the rape of volunteers. The stories catalogued
incidents illustrating failure of some Peace Corps staff to maintain whistleblower confidentiality,
inaction in response to volunteer reports of threatening behavior, a lack of compassion for victims
of crime, a tendency to blame the victim, and insensitivity to the parents of a crime victim.
Following the 20/20 reports and a House hearing on the subject held on May 11, 2011, more rape
victims came forward with stories further suggesting disregard for the victims and a possible
institutional failure to offer adequate support. While expressing support for the Peace Corps
mission, First Response Action, an organization representing volunteer victims, sought stronger
actions to reduce assault incidents and better address the needs of victims where assaults occur. In
2011, several pieces of legislation were introduced in the House and Senate that sought to answer
this call. On November 21, 2011, the Kate Puzey Peace Corps Volunteer Protection Act of 2011
was signed into law (P.L. 112-57).
Peace Corps Inspector General Report
The concerns generated by the 20/20 reports and victims’ accusations followed on the heels of a
Peace Corps IG report on volunteer safety and security released in April 2010.16 While noting that
the Peace Corps had made significant changes in its safety and security program since 2002 and
“maintained a much larger safety and security workforce than comparable international
nongovernmental organizations,” the IG “identified multiple areas where Peace Corps needed to
improve” (page i), mostly including a lack of effective processes, standardized training, and
skilled personnel to manage and implement discrete aspects of its safety and security programs.
Perhaps most troubling, the IG found numerous instances between FY2004 and FY2009 of re-
occurring evaluation findings, such as posts not thoroughly completing housing/site inspections,
14 See the Peace Corps Performance and Accountability Report for Fiscal Year FY2013 for the multiple actions taken
by the agency. Available at http://www.peacecorps.gov/about/policies/docs/.
15 “Casualties of Peace,” Dayton Daily News, October 26-November 1, 2003.
16 Peace Corps, Office of the Inspector General, Final Audit Report: Peace Corps Volunteer Safety and Security
Program, IG-10-08-A, April 2010.
Congressional Research Service
10
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
volunteers engaged in unsafe behaviors, various cities where volunteers were in locations
considered unsafe, and inadequate emergency action plans, suggesting problems in safety and
security program compliance over the long term.17
The IG report made 28 recommendations. Among these were that the Peace Corps Director
should establish clear lines of authority to ensure that the Office of Safety and Security can
manage the safety and security program; that the Director adequately track Safety and Security
Officer recommendations to make sure they are being met; that the chief compliance officer
establish a process to identify re-occurring problems and take steps to address them; that the role,
number, and salaries for Safety and Security Coordinators be reviewed to ensure agency needs are
met; that the Office of Safety and Security develop and implement a training program for Officers
and Coordinators based on needed skills; that the Office of Safety and Security develop a
comprehensive plan that includes the agency’s safety and security strategy, risks, and policies to
mitigate those risks; that volunteers be provided with a consolidated handbook on the basic
principles of volunteer safety during the recruitment and staging process and be required to sign a
code of conduct on basic security principles before departure; and that a formal agreement be
reached with the Department of State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security clarifying roles of each
agency.18 As of July 2012, the Peace Corps had implemented all 28 of the IG’s recommendations.
The Peace Corps Response to the 20/20 Stories and Victims’ Charges
Following the television programs, the Peace Corps Director issued statements noting that the
programs did not accurately reflect Peace Corps policy and practice regarding the safety and
security of volunteers. The Peace Corps immediately issued a formal Commitment to Sexual
Assault Victims, which included, among other things, promises to treat victims of sexual assault
with dignity and respect, to take appropriate steps to provide for their safety, to support volunteers
in their recovery, and to work closely with them in decisions regarding continuation of service.
The Director of the Peace Corps also offered apologies to the family and friends of the murder
victim if the agency could have been more compassionate.19
In addition to noting its ongoing efforts to improve on its safety record and better serve
volunteers, the Peace Corps pointed out that volunteers themselves in their annual survey have
reported feeling “usually safe” and “very safe” where they live and where they work, in 2010
respectively 87% and 91%.20
The Peace Corps asserted that its operating procedures in response to sexual assault and training
offered to volunteers had resulted in “a significant decline in the incidence of rape and major
sexual assault among Volunteers over the past 14 years.”21 According to the Peace Corps, between
1997 and 2009 there was a 27% decline in the incidence of rape and attempted rape and a 34%
decline in the incidence of major sexual assault.22
17 Peace Corps, Office of the Inspector General, Final Audit Report: Peace Corps Volunteer Safety and Security
Program, IG-10-08-A, April 2010, p. 17.
18 Ibid., pp. 49-51.
19 Peace Corps Director Aaron S. Williams’ Response to ABC News’ 20/20, January 14, 2011 and January 27, 2011.
20 Peace Corps 2010 Annual Volunteer Survey, p. 25.
21 Peace Corps Fact Sheet: Sexual Assault Prevention and Response, January 2011.
22 Peace Corps Director Aaron S. Williams’ Response to ABC World News, January 27, 2011. It should be noted,
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
11
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
A statement issued by the Peace Corps claimed that there were procedures in place “to respond
quickly and compassionately to Volunteers.”23 Further, the Peace Corps had taken a number of
steps to improve its procedures in the months following the 20/20 reports. These are discussed
below.
Processes to Address Safety and Security
The Peace Corps has always had in place various procedures and processes to address the issues
of volunteer safety and security, but such efforts have been particularly pronounced in the past
decade. Following a 2002 Government Accountability Office (GAO) finding that APeace Corps
efforts to ensure effective implementation of its safety and security policies have produced
varying results,” the Peace Corps launched numerous initiatives—including establishment of a
stand-alone Safety and Security Office to direct and oversee all security programs, deployment of
U.S. direct hire field-based safety and security officers and local hire safety and security
personnel, and appointment at headquarters of regional desk officers and a chief compliance
officer to monitor compliance with new security rules and procedures.24 Nonetheless, GAO
reported on March 24, 2004, that some “unevenness” in compliance with procedures mandated by
headquarters likely remained.25
Peace Corps has taken additional steps to improve safety and security, most notably, in 2008,
establishing a Sexual Assault Working Group to examine risk factors, analyze training, and adopt
best practices to reduce risk and address victims’ needs. In late 2010, the agency approved
establishment of a victim’s advocate position in response to suggestions from returned volunteers.
The advocate supports volunteer victims of crime, from the crime through post-Peace Corps
service, including helping them sort through the red tape to receive post-service health benefits.
In February 2011, the Office of Safety and Security issued a document on Guidelines for
Responding to Rape and Major Sexual Assault that captures the policies and procedures in place
to assist and respond to volunteer rape or major sexual assault. Peace Corps staff are expected to
serve as advocates for the volunteer and ensure “that what happens next is in the Volunteer’s best
interest.”26 This includes ensuring a safe environment and emotional stability, providing medical
care and counseling, and helping preserve a volunteer’s right to prosecute. Since April 2012, over
350 staff abroad were trained on these protocols. Many of these efforts were strengthened or
added to as a result of the 2011 Kate Puzey Volunteer Protection Act discussed below.27
(...continued)
however, that the 2010 Annual Report on Volunteer Safety published in May 2012 shows a 64% increase in the rate of
female rape per female volunteer years from the previous year, although the category of female major sexual assault
fell by 7%.
23 Peace Corps Fact Sheet: Sexual Assault Prevention and Response, January 2011.
24 Government Accountability Office, Peace Corps: Initiatives for Addressing Safety and Security Challenges Hold
Promise, but Progress Should be Assessed, GAO-02-818, July 2002, p. 2.
25 Testimony of Jess T. Ford, Director, International Affairs and Trade, General Accounting Office, before the
Committee on International Relations, Peace Corps: Status of Initiatives to Improve Volunteer Safety and Security,
GAO-04-600T, March 24, 2004.
26 Peace Corps, Office of Safety and Security, Guidelines for Responding to Rape and Major Sexual Assault, February
2011, p.12.
27 For an update on Peace Corps implementation of the act, see Progress in Implementation of the Kate Puzey Peace
Corps Volunteer Protection Act of 2011, November 2012, on the Peace Corps website at http://files.peacecorps.gov/
multimedia/pdf/media/Progress_on_Implementation_of_Kate_Puzey_Act_Nov_2012.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
12
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
In two November 2013 reports on the status of implementation of aspects of the Kate Puzey
Act—specifically sexual assault training and the agency’s sexual assault policy—the Peace Corps
IG found that “many elements of the Peace Corps’ sexual assault policy are in place, but full
compliance with the Kate Puzey Act remains a work in progress.” Sexual assault training
conforming to existing best practices has been provided to all 27-month volunteers. Peace Corps
management has concurred with all the IG recommendations.28
In 2013, the volunteer survey showed 82% and 85% felt “more than adequately safe,” or “very
safe” where they live and work, a slight improvement over 2012 but less than the 2010 results of
87% and 92%. However, in all three years, those feeling “adequately safe” or better amounted to
98%.29
Legislation on Safety and Security
Congress responded to the safety and security issue by holding a House Foreign Affairs
Committee hearing on May 11, 2011; a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on October
6, 2011; and by introducing several pieces of legislation amending the Peace Corps Act, most
notably S. 1280, the Kate Puzey Peace Corps Volunteer Protection Act of 2011, reported on
September 21, 2011, by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (S.Rept. 112-82), approved by
the Senate on September 26, 2011, and by the House on November 1, 2011, and signed into law
on November 21, 2011, as P.L. 112-57.
In addition, Congress considered a companion bill to S. 1280, H.R. 2337, ordered reported by the
House Foreign Affairs Committee on September 21, 2011; Title X of H.R. 2583, the Foreign
Relations Authorization for FY2012, reported on July 21, 2011, by the House Foreign Affairs
Committee; and H.R. 2699, the Peace Corps Volunteer Service Improvement Act of 2011,
reported by the House Foreign Affairs Committee on September 21, 2011.
The Kate Puzey Act (P.L. 112-57) pulls together most of the language on safety and security
issues as is contained in these other bills. It specifies that volunteers receive sexual assault risk
reduction and response training, including training tailored to the country of service covering
safety plans in the event of an assault, medical treatments available, medevac procedures, and
information on the legal process for pressing charges. Peace Corps applicants are to be provided
with a historical analysis of crimes and risks in the proposed country of service. Trainees will be
provided with contact information of the Inspector General for purposes of reporting violations of
the sexual assault protocol and of the victims advocate. The bill requires that sexual assault
protocols and guidelines be developed by the Peace Corps director and training be provided to
staff regarding implementation of the protocol. Volunteers can request removal from a site, which
would then be evaluated for its safety. Sexual response teams are established to respond to reports
of sexual assault by volunteers. Alternative reporting systems are established that allow volunteer
anonymity. A victims advocate position is established to assist sexually assaulted volunteers and
facilitate access to available services. A Sexual Assault Advisory Council is established composed
of returned volunteers and experts on sexual assault to review training and policy to ensure they
conform to best practices. An annual survey is to be conducted regarding the effectiveness of
28 Peace Corps Office of the Inspector General, Peace Corps Sexual Assault Risk-Reduction and Response Training,
November 2013, and Peace Corps Volunteer Sexual Assault Policy, November 2013.
29 Peace Corps, 2010 Annual Volunteer Survey, p. 25, 2012 Annual Volunteer Survey, p. 146. and 2013 Annual
Volunteer Survey, p. 48.
Congressional Research Service
13
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Peace Corps programs and safety. A process is established to allow reports of incidents while
protecting the confidentiality of volunteers. It is required that the Peace Corps and State
Department Bureau of Diplomatic Security agree to a memorandum of understanding on the
duties and obligations of each with respect to protection of Peace Corps volunteers and staff. And,
a report on safety and security is to be submitted annually to Congress.
Instability, Terrorism, and Evacuations
The Peace Corps has been particularly concerned in recent years with threats of terrorism and
civil strife and has responded by upgrading communications, testing emergency action plans, and
other security measures. The Peace Corps addresses these larger security concerns, including
natural disasters or civil unrest, through country-specific Emergency Action Plans (EAP) that are
to be in place in each Peace Corps country. The plan, to be tested and revised annually, defines
roles and responsibilities for staff and volunteers, explains standard policies and procedures, and
lists emergency contact information for every volunteer in country.
Evacuations and closure of missions to ensure the well-being of volunteers have constrained the
growth of the Peace Corps. Since 2000, volunteers have been evacuated from at least 17
countries. Most often, evacuations were due to cases of political instability and civil unrest. Three
were attributed to the events of September 11—Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and the Kyrgyz
Republic.30 In April 2012, volunteers were withdrawn from Mali and the program suspended in
response to the political and security crisis in that country. It remains suspended. Niger has been
similarly suspended since January 2011. Start-up of the new Peace Corps program in Tunisia
continues to be delayed due to the attack on the U.S. Embassy in that country in September 2012
and ongoing political and security uncertainties.
Crime is another factor in agency evacuation decisions. The Peace Corps suspended its 117-
volunteer program in Kazakhstan in mid-November 2011 “based on a number of operational
considerations,” according to an agency press release. Volunteer reports suggest that rapes and
terrorist attacks may be the specific cause.31 Due to concerns regarding the prevalence of drug
and organized crime-related violence in Central America, the Peace Corps announced in
December 2011 that it would send no new volunteers to Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador
while it conducted a review of its operations and the security environment in those locations. In
the case of Honduras, currently serving volunteers were withdrawn on administrative leave and
completed service while the review was ongoing. The review was completed in February 2012,
and the program in Honduras was formally suspended in September 2012 and will be formally
closed in FY2014. Volunteers in Guatemala and El Salvador are continuing to serve, and the
Peace Corps resumed sending new volunteers to those countries in 2013 at reduced levels. To
address safety concerns in Guatemala and El Salvador, volunteer operations were consolidated in
safer geographical areas, alternative volunteer transportation was devised, and training and
support was enhanced.
Despite the appeal of using Peace Corps volunteers to convey U.S. culture and values directly to
the grassroots of Islamic countries, many of these countries of U.S. foreign policy interest might
be considered unsafe for Americans over the foreseeable future. Nonetheless, it should be noted
that, according to the Peace Corps, about 17% of all volunteers are serving in 11 countries with
30 They later returned to Turkmenistan and Kyrgyz Republic. The Turkmenistan program closed in September 2012.
31 See Peace Corps Online, November 18, 2011, at http://peacecorpsonline.org/.
Congressional Research Service
14
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Muslim populations of over 40%.32 In FY2010, the Peace Corps launched a program in Indonesia,
the most populous Muslim country in the world. In general, the Peace Corps has argued that the
close interpersonal relationship between volunteers and members of their host country
community helps to make them safe.
Volunteer Access to Abortion
Since 1979, the annual Peace Corps appropriations language has prohibited funds from being
used to pay for abortions. The issue of volunteer access to abortion has received attention,
because the Administration’s FY2014 and FY2015 budget requests included proposed language
that would allow health insurance coverage for volunteers in cases of rape, incest, and when the
mother’s life is endangered.
The argument for paying for abortions under the above restricted circumstances is that private
insurance offered to federal employees, including those administering the Peace Corps program,
covers abortions in the case of rape, incest, and when the mother’s life is endangered. Volunteers,
however, are considered federal employees only for certain very narrowly defined purposes such
as legal liability, baggage transport, and check cashing eligibility. Abortions therefore can be
excluded from volunteer health care although all other care—primary care, hospitalization,
medical evacuation, all prescriptions including birth control and dental care needs—is provided
directly by the Peace Corps either through its Medical Officer or insurance.33
Opponents of the proposal argue that its adoption would be an expansion of abortion services by
the federal government.34
S. 813, the Peace Corps Equity Act of 2013, introduced on April 25, 2013 (Lautenberg), and
reflecting the Administration 2013 proposal but in the form of authorization language, would
have amended the Peace Corps Act to apply the same abortion restrictions to volunteer health
care insurance as currently apply to federal employee health plans. On May 6, 2014, the Peace
Corps Equity Act of 2014, reiterating the language of the 2013 bill, was introduced by
Representative Lowey in the House (H.R. 4578) and by Senator Shaheen in the Senate (S. 2291).
In June 2014, both House and Senate Appropriations Committees approved State, Foreign
Operations appropriations bills for FY2015 that would allow exceptions to the prohibition on
funding abortions in the case of rape, incest, or endangerment to the life of the mother. This
provision was adopted in the final version of the Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2015 (H.R. 83, P.L. 113-235, Division J). However, as appropriations
language, the provision applies only to FY2015 funding.
32 Data as of May 2013 provided by Peace Corps.
33 The Peace Corps’ authorization language (P.L. 87-293, as amended, §5(e)) requires that Peace Corps provide health
care to volunteers during service.
34 Lisa Rein, “Peace Corps Volunteers Could Get Health Insurance Coverage for Abortions,” Washington Post, April
26, 2013.
Congressional Research Service
15
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
The Five-Year Rule
The five-year rule is an issue long discussed in the Peace Corps community and periodically
addressed by Congress. It is the subject of a 2012 report by the agency’s Office of the Inspector
General (OIG) that suggests Congress may again have a role to play.35 And it is noted under the
challenge, excessive personnel turnover, in the OIG’s FY2014 annual statement of management
and performance challenges as a continuing issue of concern.36
The five-year rule, which became law in August 1965 in an amendment to Section 7(a) of the
Peace Corps Act (P.L. 87-293, as amended), limits most Peace Corps staff to five years’
employment. The same amendment allows a one-year extension if personally approved by the
Director. A subsequent amendment in 1985 permits 15% of U.S. direct hires a further extension of
two and a half years, meaning that these individuals could be employed for a total of eight and a
half years. In addition, staff can only leave the Peace Corps and be rehired after an amount of
time equal to their preceding term of service has passed, in effect limiting a route around the rule.
The five-year rule does not apply to personal service contractors or foreign nationals. Direct hire
staff involved in the safety of volunteers, including the new victims advocate position, and the
Inspector General and OIG staff are also exempt as a result of congressional action in the FY2004
appropriations (P.L. 108-199) and the 2011 Kate Puzey Volunteer Protection Act, respectively.
Implementation of the five-year rule is seen to have had both positive and negative effects on the
performance of the Peace Corps. Positive aspects are to a large extent those associated with the
original arguments in favor of the rule’s adoption; they continue to have force. Negative aspects
following adoption of the rule have driven the addition of limited extensions and exemptions to
its application. But they continue to cause concern.
Positive features of the five-year rule possibly include that it
• creates a workforce generally perceived as vibrant, youthful, and energetic;
• because of high turnover, permits the hiring of more returned Peace Corps
volunteers (53% of all direct hires between 2000 and 2010 were RPCVs and 78%
of overseas leadership posts), whose recent experience in the field provides high-
quality policy input;
• generates a flow of staff departing for other international agencies that increases
the influence of Peace Corps on foreign policy, a benefit originally suggested by
Sargent Shriver;
• facilitates removal of poorly performing staff;
• provides a performance incentive for currently serving volunteers who might in
the future want to obtain employment in the agency; and
• creates possible cost savings from not accruing long-term salary and benefit
obligations.
35 Peace Corps Office of the Inspector General, Final Evaluation Report: Impacts of the Five-Year Rule on Operations
of the Peace Corps, IG-12-05-E, June 2012.
36 Peace Corps Office of the Inspector General, Semiannual Report to Congress, April 1 to September 30, 2014,
pp. 11-13.
Congressional Research Service
16
The Peace Corps: Current Issues
Negative features of the five-year rule largely derive from the higher turnover and short tenure of
staff. Instead of a turnover of 20% each year, implied by the five-year rule, the actual rate is much
higher—25% to 33% each year since 2004 according to the OIG, quadruple that of the rest of the
federal government. The average length of service is three years. These figures suggest that
individuals are looking outside of the Peace Corps for more stable employment long before their
term expires. The possible resulting negative impact includes
• poor institutional memory;
• frequent staffing vacancies;
• no long-term career incentives to encourage high performance;
• insufficient time for constantly departing staff to identify, develop, test, and
implement innovative ideas;
• disincentive for management to invest in training and professional development;
• diminished management capacity, the rule being noted as a factor in multiple
previous OIG and GAO reports focusing on volunteer support, contract, and
financial management; and
• high staff recruitment costs—costs strictly attributable to five-year rule turnover
estimated by the OIG to be between $12.6 million and $15.5 million in the period
2005 through 2009.
The OIG evaluation made five broad recommendations to the Peace Corps, including that the
Director should carry out unspecified reforms, including legislative remedies, to reduce the rate
of turnover and increase length of employment, and identify which core functions suffer from
turnover and develop processes to retain those personnel.
Since OIG report publication, Peace Corps has taken steps to mitigate the negative impacts of the
five-year rule. It is offering five-year employment to new employees instead of the former two
and half year term. It is trying to fully utilize existing legislative authority to provide an
additional two and a half years on top of the five-year term for up to 15% of its staff—in 2010,
only 10% of staff benefitted; now more than 14% benefit. It is also planning on utilizing authority
that allows an unlimited number of staff to continue for a year after their five-year term under
“special circumstances.” At the same time, the agency is also working to identify the causes of
employee early resignation and the specific functions and positions where staff turnover is most
harmful in order to best address the problem. According to Peace Corps, legislative remedies may
be sought if these and other efforts are insufficient.
Author Contact Information
Curt Tarnoff
Specialist in Foreign Affairs
ctarnoff@crs.loc.gov, 7-7656
Congressional Research Service
17