Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act: Spring
2013 Unified Agenda
Maeve P. Carey
Analyst in Government Organization and Management
Michelle D. Christensen
Analyst in Government Organization and Management
January 2, 2014
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R43348
CRS Report for Congress
Pr
epared for Members and Committees of Congress

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Summary
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA, as amended) was signed into law by
President Barack Obama on March 23, 2010. As is often the case with legislation, the ACA
granted rulemaking authority to federal agencies to implement many of its provisions. The
regulations issued pursuant to the ACA and other statutes carry the force and effect of law.
Therefore, scholars and practitioners have long noted the importance of rulemaking to the policy
process, as well as the importance of congressional oversight of rulemaking. For example, one
scholar noted that the “Constitution’s grant of legislative power to Congress encompasses a
responsibility to ensure that delegated authority is exercised according to appropriate
procedures.” Congressional oversight of rulemaking can deal with a variety of issues, including
the substance of the rules issued pursuant to congressional delegations of authority and the
process by which those rules are issued.
Having a sense of what rules agencies are going to issue and when they are going to issue those
rules can help Congress to provide oversight over the regulations that are issued pursuant to the
ACA. One way in which Congress can identify upcoming ACA rules is by reviewing the Unified
Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions (hereinafter, Unified Agenda), which is
published by the Regulatory Information Service Center (RISC), a component of the U.S. General
Services Administration (GSA), for the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB’s) Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). The Unified Agenda lists upcoming activities, by
agency, in three separate categories:
• “active” actions, including rules in the prerule stage (e.g., advance notices of
proposed rulemaking that are expected to be issued in the next 12 months);
proposed rule stage (i.e., notices of proposed rulemaking that are expected to be
issued in the next 12 months, or for which the closing date of the comment period
is the next step); and final rule stage (i.e., final rules or other final actions that are
expected to be issued in the next 12 months);
• “completed” actions (i.e., final rules or rules that have been withdrawn since the
last edition of the Unified Agenda); and
• “long-term” actions (i.e., items under development that agencies do not expect to
take action on in the next 12 months).
All entries in the Unified Agenda usually have uniform data elements, which typically include the
department and agency issuing the rule, the title of the rule, the Regulation Identifier Number
(RIN), an abstract describing the nature of the action being taken, and a timetable showing the
dates of past actions and a projected date for the next regulatory action. Each entry also indicates
the priority of the regulation (e.g., whether it is considered “economically significant” under
Executive Order 12866, or whether it is considered a “major” rule under the Congressional
Review Act).
The Spring 2013 Unified Agenda, which was published on July 3, 2013, was the fifth edition of
the Unified Agenda following enactment of ACA. In this edition, agencies reported 20 proposed
rules and 23 final rules that they expect to issue pursuant to ACA within the next 12 months.
Agencies also reported a total of 13 long-term regulatory actions.
The Appendix of this report lists the upcoming proposed and final rules published in the Spring
2013 Unified Agenda in a table.
Congressional Research Service

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act


Congressional Research Service

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Mandatory and Discretionary Rulemaking Provisions .............................................................. 1
Congressional Oversight and the Unified Agenda..................................................................... 2
The Unified Agenda ............................................................................................................ 2
Scope and Methodology of This Report .................................................................................... 4
Upcoming ACA Proposed Rules ...................................................................................................... 5
Notable Proposed Rules ............................................................................................................ 5
Rules Included in the Regulatory Plan ................................................................................ 5
“Economically Significant” or “Major” Proposed Rules .................................................... 5
Other Significant Proposed Rules ....................................................................................... 6
Effects on Small Entities ..................................................................................................... 7
Upcoming ACA Final Rules ............................................................................................................ 8
Notable Final Rules ................................................................................................................... 9
Rules Included in the Regulatory Plan ................................................................................ 9
“Economically Significant” or “Major” Final Rules ........................................................... 9
Other Significant Final Rules ............................................................................................ 10
Effects on Small Entities ................................................................................................... 11
ACA Long-Term Actions ............................................................................................................... 12
Notable Long-Term Actions .................................................................................................... 13
Congressional Oversight Options .................................................................................................. 13

Appendixes
Appendix. Upcoming Proposed and Final Rules Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act ................. 16

Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 26

Congressional Research Service

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Introduction
Federal regulations generally result from an act of Congress and are one significant means by
which statutes are implemented and specific requirements are established. Congress delegates
rulemaking authority to agencies for a variety of reasons, and in a variety of ways. The Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA, as amended) is a particularly noteworthy example of
congressional delegation of rulemaking authority to federal agencies.1 The ACA is a
comprehensive reform of the health care system that includes such provisions as the expansion of
eligibility for Medicaid, amendments to Medicare that are intended to reduce its growth, an
individual mandate for the purchase of health insurance, and the establishment of insurance
exchanges through which individuals and families can receive federal subsidies to help them
purchase insurance. A previous CRS report identified more than 40 provisions in the ACA that
explicitly require or permit the issuance of rules to implement the law.2
The rules that agencies issue pursuant to the ACA are expected to have a major impact on how the
law is implemented. For example, in an article entitled “The War Isn’t Over” that was posted on
the New England Journal of Medicine’s Health Care Reform Center shortly after the ACA was
signed into law, Henry J. Aaron and Robert D. Reischauer wrote:
Making the legislation a success requires not only that it survive but also that it be effectively
implemented. Although the bill runs to more than 2000 pages, much remains to be decided.
The legislation tasks federal or state officials with writing regulations, making appointments,
and giving precise meaning to many terms.3
Mandatory and Discretionary Rulemaking Provisions
The manner in which Congress delegates rulemaking authority to federal agencies determines the
amount of discretion the agencies have in crafting the rules and, conversely, the amount of control
that Congress retains for itself. Some of the more than 40 rulemaking provisions in the ACA are
quite specific, stipulating the substance of the rules, whether certain consultative or rulemaking
procedures should be used, and deadlines for their issuance or implementation.4 Other provisions

1 The ACA was signed into law on March 23, 2010 (P.L. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119). On March 30, 2010, the President
signed the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (HCERA; P.L. 111-152, 124 Stat. 1029), which amended
multiple health care and revenue provisions in the ACA. Several other subsequently enacted bills made more targeted
changes to specific ACA provisions. All references to the ACA in this report refer to the law as amended. For more
information on the ACA, see CRS Report R41664, ACA: A Brief Overview of the Law, Implementation, and Legal
Challenges, coordinated by C. Stephen Redhead.
2 CRS Report R41180, Rulemaking Requirements and Authorities in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(PPACA), by Curtis W. Copeland. The author of that report has retired from CRS; questions about its content can be
directed to the authors of this report.
3 Henry J. Aaron and Robert D. Reischauer, “The War Isn’t Over,” New England Journal of Medicine, Health Care
Reform Center, March 24, 2010, available at http://healthcarereform.nejm.org/?p=3223&query=home.
4 Although the law contains a number of deadlines for the issuance of rules, rulemaking deadlines are generally
somewhat difficult to enforce, unless the statute itself contains an enforcement mechanism. None of the provisions in
the ACA contain a legislative enforcement mechanism. One potential option for enforcement is civil litigation,
although courts often defer to agencies’ judgment on the timing of their issuance of a rule. For more information on
agency delay of the issuance of regulations, see CRS Report R43013, Administrative Agencies and Claims of
Unreasonable Delay: Analysis of Court Treatment, by Daniel T. Shedd.
Congressional Research Service
1

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

in the ACA permit, but do not require, the agencies to issue certain rules (e.g., stating that the
head of an agency “may issue regulations” defining certain terms, or “may by regulation”
establish guidance or requirements for carrying out the legislation). As a result, the agency head
has the discretion to decide whether to issue any regulations at all, and if so, what those rules will
contain. Still other provisions in the ACA require agencies to establish programs or procedures
but do not specifically mention regulations.
Congressional Oversight and the Unified Agenda
In his book Building a Legislative-Centered Public Administration, David H. Rosenbloom noted
that rulemaking and lawmaking are functionally equivalent (the results of both processes have the
force of law), and that when agencies issue rules they, in effect, legislate. He went on to say that
the “Constitution’s grant of legislative power to Congress encompasses a responsibility to ensure
that delegated authority is exercised according to appropriate procedures.”5 Congressional
oversight of rulemaking can deal with a variety of issues, including the substance of the rules
issued pursuant to congressional delegations of authority and the process by which those rules are
issued.
Having a sense of what rules agencies are going to issue and when they are going to issue those
rules can help Congress to provide oversight over the regulations that are issued pursuant to the
ACA. The previously referenced CRS report identifying the provisions in the act that require or
permit rulemaking can be useful in this regard.6 However, the law does not indicate when some of
the mandatory rules should be issued.
The Unified Agenda
A potentially effective way for Congress to identify upcoming ACA rules is by reviewing the
Unified Agenda, which is usually published twice each year (in the spring and fall).7 The Unified
Agenda is published by the Regulatory Information Service Center (RISC), a component of the
U.S. General Services Administration (GSA), for the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB’s) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA).8 The Unified Agenda helps
agencies fulfill two current transparency requirements:
• The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. §602) requires that all agencies publish
semiannual regulatory agendas in the Federal Register, in April and October of
each year, describing regulatory actions that they are developing that may have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.9

5 David H. Rosenbloom, Building a Legislative-Centered Public Administration: Congress and the Administrative
State, 1946-1999 (Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press, 2000), pp. 133-134.
6 CRS Report R41180, Rulemaking Requirements and Authorities in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
(PPACA), by Curtis W. Copeland. The author of that report has retired from CRS; questions about its content can be
directed to the authors of this report.
7 To comply with the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. §602) and Executive Order 12866, the
Unified Agenda is usually published twice annually—in the spring and fall. The 2012 Unified Agenda, however, was
published as a single edition on December 21, 2012. The fall 2011 edition was published in January 2012.
8 The current edition of the Unified Agenda is available at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain.
9 This requirement applies to all agencies covered by the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. §551(1)).
Congressional Research Service
2

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

• Section 4 of Executive Order 12866 on “Regulatory Planning and Review”
requires that all executive branch agencies “prepare an agenda of all regulations
under development or review.”10 The stated purposes of this and other planning
requirements in the order are, among other things, to “maximize consultation and
the resolution of potential conflicts at an early stage” and to “involve the public
and its State, local, and tribal officials in regulatory planning.” The executive
order also requires that each agency prepare, as part of the fall edition of the
Unified Agenda, a “regulatory plan” of the most important significant regulatory
actions that the agency reasonably expects to issue in proposed or final form
during the upcoming fiscal year.
The Unified Agenda lists upcoming activities, by agency, in three separate categories:
• “active” actions, including rules in the prerule stage (e.g., advance notices of
proposed rulemaking that are expected to be issued in the next 12 months);
proposed rule stage (i.e., notices of proposed rulemaking that are expected to be
issued in the next 12 months, or for which the closing date of the comment period
is the next step); and final rule stage (i.e., final rules or other final actions that are
expected to be issued in the next 12 months);
• “completed” actions (i.e., final rules or rules that have been withdrawn since the
last edition of the Unified Agenda); and
• “long-term” actions (i.e., items under development that agencies do not expect to
take action on in the next 12 months).
All entries in the Unified Agenda usually have uniform data elements, which typically include the
department and agency issuing the rule, the title of the rule, the Regulation Identifier Number
(RIN),11 an abstract describing the nature of action being taken, and a timetable showing the dates
of past actions and a projected date (sometimes just the projected month and year) for the next
regulatory action. Each entry also contains an element indicating the priority of the regulation
(e.g., whether it is considered “economically significant” under Executive Order 12866, or
whether it is considered a “major” rule under the Congressional Review Act).12

10 Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” 58 Federal Register 51735, October 4, 1993. Although
most of the requirements in this executive order do not apply to independent regulatory agencies (e.g., the Securities
and Exchange Commission and Federal Reserve Board), this section of the order does include those agencies.
11 RINs are assigned by RISC, and the Office of Management and Budget has asked agencies to include RINs in the
headings of their rulemaking documents when they are published in the Federal Register to make it easier for the
public and agency officials to track the publication history of regulatory actions. For a copy of this memorandum, see
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/inforeg/IncreasingOpenness_04072010.pdf.
12 Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 defines a “significant” regulatory action as one that is likely to result in a rule
that may: “(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive order.” Regulatory actions meeting the
first of these four criteria are considered “economically significant.” The definition of a “major” rule under the
Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. §§801-808) is similar to the definition of “economically significant,” since both
definitions are triggered if a rule has, among other things, a $100 million effect on the economy.
Congressional Research Service
3

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

There is no penalty for issuing a rule without a prior notice in the Unified Agenda, and some
prospective rules listed in the Unified Agenda never get issued, reflecting the fluid nature of the
rulemaking process. Nevertheless, the Unified Agenda can help Congress and the public know
what regulatory actions are about to occur, and, arguably, it provides federal agencies with the
most systematic, government-wide method to alert the public about their upcoming proposed
rules.13
Scope and Methodology of This Report
The Spring 2013 edition of the Unified Agenda, which was published on July 3, 2013, is the fifth
edition that RISC has compiled and issued after the enactment of the ACA.14 Federal agencies
were required to submit data to RISC for the Unified Agenda by April 24, 2013, but some items
may have been subsequently updated during the OIRA review process.15
This report examines the Spring 2013 edition of the Unified Agenda and identifies proposed and
final rules and long-term regulatory actions that were expected to be issued pursuant to the ACA
in the 12 months following its publication. To identify those upcoming rules and actions, CRS
searched all fields of the Unified Agenda (all agencies) using the term “Affordable Care Act,”
focusing on the proposed rule and final rule stages of rulemaking, as well as the “long-term
actions” category.
In this edition, agencies reported 20 proposed rules and 23 final rules that they expect to issue
pursuant to the ACA within the 12 months following the Agenda’s publication. Agencies also
reported a total of 13 long-term regulatory actions and 17 completed actions.
The results of the search for proposed and final rules are provided in the Appendix to this report.
For each upcoming proposed and final rule listed, the table identifies the department and agency
expected to issue the rule, the title of the rule and its RIN, an abstract describing the nature of the
rulemaking action, and the date that the proposed or final rule is expected to be issued or was
issued.16 The abstracts presented in the table were taken verbatim from the Unified Agenda
entries. Within the proposed and final rule sections of the table, the entries are organized by
agency.17

13 A previously issued CRS report indicated that about three-fourths of the significant proposed rules published after
having been reviewed by OIRA in 2008 were previously listed in the proposed rule section of the Unified Agenda. CRS
Report R40713, The Unified Agenda: Implications for Rulemaking Transparency and Participation, by Curtis W.
Copeland. The author of that report has retired from CRS; questions about its content can be directed to the authors of
this report.
14 The ACA was enacted on March 23, 2010. The first edition of the Unified Agenda following enactment of the ACA
was issued on December 20, 2010.
15 Memorandum from Dominic Mancini, Deputy Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
“Memorandum for Regulatory Policy Officers at Executive Departments and Agencies and Managing and Executive
Directors of Certain Agencies and Commissions,” March 28, 2013, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/
omb/inforeg/for-agencies/spring-2013-agenda-data-call.pdf. A previous e-mail from John C. Thomas, RISC Executive
Director, August 3, 2011, to CRS indicated that Unified Agenda items are sometimes updated during the OIRA review
process.
16 In addition to the RINs, CMS included an agency-specific number as part of the title of the rule (e.g., CMS-2327-F).
Those numbers are included as part of the title in the table in the Appendix.
17 It should be emphasized that the proposed and final rules and long-term actions identified in the Unified Agenda and
summarized in this report may not represent all the ACA-related rulemaking activity within HHS and other federal
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
4

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Upcoming ACA Proposed Rules
The July 3, 2013, edition of the Unified Agenda listed 20 ACA-related actions in the “proposed
rule stage” (indicating that the agencies expected to issue proposed rules on the topics within the
next 12 months, or for which the closing dates of the comment periods are the next step).18 Eleven
of the 20 upcoming proposed rules were expected to be issued by components of the Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS): CMS (nine actions); Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA, one action); and the Office of Civil Rights (OCR, one action). The nine
remaining proposed rules were expected to be issued by the Treasury Department’s Internal
Revenue Service (TREAS/IRS, five actions) and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM,
four actions).
Notable Proposed Rules
Rules agencies intend to issue pursuant to the ACA may be considered notable for a variety of
reasons—for example, they may be considered notable if they are listed in the agency’s
“regulatory plan,” which is described below, or if they meet a particular statutory or executive
order definition. Some examples of notable rules are listed below.
Rules Included in the Regulatory Plan
As stated earlier, Executive Order 12866 requires that each agency prepare, as part of the fall
edition of the Unified Agenda, a regulatory plan of the most important regulatory actions that the
agency reasonably expects to issue in proposed or final form during the upcoming fiscal year. The
Department of Health and Human Services considered one of the items in the proposed rule
section of the Unified Agenda important enough to be included in its regulatory plan: an
HHS/CMS rule that would establish a “Prospective Payment System for Federally Qualified
Health Centers.” The rule was considered both “economically significant” and “major.”19
“Economically Significant” or “Major” Proposed Rules
In addition to the ACA-related proposed rule that was listed in the regulatory plan, the Unified
Agenda listed five other actions that the agencies considered “economically significant” or
“major” (one definition of “economically significant” or “major,” for example, is that the rule is

(...continued)
agencies. In particular, the ACA made numerous changes to existing Medicare payment systems, either permanently or
on a temporary basis, and required coverage of new Medicare benefits. In most cases, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) has opted to address these changes in its annual rulemaking updates for the various Medicare
payment systems. For example, the annual final rules updating Medicare payment policies and rates for physician
services and for hospital inpatient services both include multiple sets of provisions to incorporate and implement ACA
mandates. These rules, and similar annual updates, may not be discussed in this report if they were not included by
agencies in the Unified Agenda.
18 The number of actions listed in the Unified Agenda and reported here may not necessarily be precisely equivalent to
the number of upcoming proposed rules. For example, in a case in which two agencies are working on a joint rule, it is
possible that they would each report it separately to the Unified Agenda, and such a rule would appear as two actions.
19 “Economically significant” and “major” proposed rules are discussed in the following section.
Congressional Research Service
5

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

expected to have at least a $100 million annual effect on the economy).20 All five of the rules
were expected to be issued by HHS/CMS. The “economically significant” or “major” proposed
rules were
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Administrative Simplification: Compliance with Health
Plan Certification,” which the agency expected to publish in September 2013 but
had not yet published as of December 2, 2013;
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Disproportionate Share Hospital Payment Reduction,”
which the agency published on May 15, 2013;21
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Changes to the End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective
Payment System,” which the agency published on July 8, 2013;22
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters,” which the
agency published on December 2, 2013;23 and
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Establishment of the Basic Health Program,” which the
agency published on September 25, 2013.24
Other Significant Proposed Rules
In addition to the above-mentioned rules, the agencies characterized 4 of the 20 actions that were
listed in the proposed rule section of the Unified Agenda as “other significant,” indicating that
although they were not listed in the regulatory plan or expected to be “economically significant,”
they were expected to be significant enough to be reviewed by OIRA under Executive Order
12866.25 The “other significant” proposed rules were
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Requirements for Long-Term Care Facilities,” which the
agency expects to publish in December 2013;

20 For definitions and a more complete discussion of “economically significant” and “major” rules, see CRS Report
R43056, Counting Regulations: An Overview of Rulemaking, Types of Federal Regulations, and Pages in the Federal
Register, by Maeve P. Carey.
21 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Medicaid Program;
State Disproportionate Share Hospital Allotment Reductions,” 78 Federal Register 28551, May 15, 2013.
22 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “End-Stage Renal
Disease Prospective Payment System, Quality Incentive Program, and Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics,
Orthotics, and Supplies,” 78 Federal Register 40836, July 8, 2013.
23 Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Notice of Benefit and
Payment Parameters for 2015,” 78 Federal Register 72321, December 2, 2013.
24 Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Basic Health Program:
State Administration of Basic Health Programs; Eligibility and Enrollment in Standard Health Plans; Essential Health
Benefits in Standard Health Plans; Performance Standards for Basic Health Programs; Premium and Cost Sharing for
Basic Health Programs; Federal Funding Process; Trust Fund and Financial Integrity,” 78 Federal Register 59122,
September 25, 2013.
25 Executive Order 12866 requires covered agencies (all except independent regulatory agencies like the Securities and
Exchange Commission) to submit their “significant” rules to OIRA for review before publication as a proposed or final
rule. For more information, see CRS Report RL32397, Federal Rulemaking: The Role of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, coordinated by Maeve P. Carey.
Congressional Research Service
6

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

• an HHS/CMS rule on “Exchanges: Additional Program Implementation,” which
the agency published on June 19, 2013;26
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Appeals Process for Medicare Part C and Part D
Recovery Audit Contractor Determinations,” which the agency expects to publish
in February 2014; and
• an HHS/OCR rule on “Nondiscrimination Under the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act,” which the agency expects to publish sometime in
December 2013.
Effects on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA, 5 U.S.C. §601 et seq.) generally requires federal agencies
to assess the impact of their forthcoming regulations on “small entities” (i.e., small businesses,
small governments, and small not-for-profit organizations).27 Two of the ACA-related rules listed
in the proposed rule section triggered or were expected to trigger the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act because of their effects on small entities:
• a proposed TREAS/IRS rule published on September 9, 2013, on “Reporting and
Notice Requirements Under Section 6056” triggered the requirements of the RFA
(5 U.S.C. §602) because of its effects on small businesses and small
governments;28 and
• a proposed HHS/CMS rule published on September 23, 2013, that would
establish a “Prospective Payment System for Federally Qualified Health Centers
(FQHCs)” is expected to trigger the requirements of the RFA because of its effect
on small governments and small not-for-profit organizations.29
In eight other upcoming proposed rules, the agencies indicated in the Agenda that they had yet to
determine whether a regulatory flexibility analysis would be triggered. These rules were
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Administrative Simplification: Compliance with Health
Plan Certification,” which the agency expected to publish in September 2013 but
had not yet published as of December 2, 2013;
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Changes to the End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective
Payment System,” which the agency published on July 8, 2013;30

26 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act; Program Integrity: Exchange, SHOP, Premium Stabilization Programs, and Market Standards,”
78 Federal Register 37032, June 19, 2013.
27 For more information, see CRS Report RL32240, The Federal Rulemaking Process: An Overview, coordinated by
Maeve P. Carey.
28 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, “Information Reporting by Applicable Large Employers
on Health Insurance Covered Offered Under Employer-Sponsored Plans,” 78 Federal Register 54996, September 9,
2013.
29 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Medicare Program;
Prospective Payment System for Federally Qualified Health Centers; Changes to Contracting Policies for Rural Health
Clinics; and Changes to Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Enforcement Actions for Proficiency
Testing Referral,” 78 Federal Register 58386, September 23, 2013.
30 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “End-Stage Renal
Disease Prospective Payment System, Quality Incentive Program, and Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics,
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
7

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

• an HHS/CMS rule on “Requirements for Long-Term Care Facilities,” which the
agency expects to publish in December 2013;
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Exchanges: Additional Program Implementation,” which
the agency published on June 19, 2013;31
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Notice of Benefit and Payment Parameters,” which the
agency published on December 2, 2013;32
• an HHS/OCR rule on “Nondiscrimination Under the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act,” which the agency expects to publish sometime in
December 2013;
• a TREAS/IRS rule on “Medical Loss Ratio for Section 833 Organizations,”
which the agency published on May 13, 2013;33 and
• a TREAS/IRS rule on “Tax Credit for Employee Health Insurance Expenses of
Small Employer,” which the agency published on August 26, 2013.34
Upcoming ACA Final Rules
The July 3, 2013, edition of the Unified Agenda listed 25 ACA-related actions in the proposed
rule section (indicating that the agencies expected to issue these final rules within the next 12
months).35 Thirteen of the 25 upcoming final actions are expected to be issued by components of
HHS: the Food and Drug Administration (FDA, two actions); HRSA (two actions); CMS (eight
actions); and the Office of the Secretary (OS, one action). Four of the 25 upcoming final rules are
expected to be issued by TREAS/IRS. Five of the upcoming final rules are expected to be issued
by the DOL: the Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA, three actions); Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA, one action); and the Office of Workers’ Compensation
Programs (OWCP, one action). Other final rules are expected to be issued by the Architectural
and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (ATBCB, one action); OPM (one action); and the
Social Security Administration (SSA, one action).

(...continued)
Orthotics, and Supplies,” 78 Federal Register 40836, July 8, 2013.
31 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act; Program Integrity: Exchange, SHOP, Premium Stabilization Programs, and Market Standards,”
78 Federal Register 37032, June 19, 2013.
32 Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Notice of Benefit and
Payment Parameters for 2015,” 78 Federal Register 72321, December 2, 2013.
33 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, “Computation of, and Rules Relating to, Medical Loss
Ratio,” 78 Federal Register 27873, May 13, 2013.
34 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, “Tax Credit for Employee Health Insurance Expenses of
Small Employers,” 78 Federal Register 52719, August 26, 2013.
35 The number of actions listed in the Unified Agenda and the number of upcoming proposed rules reported here is not
equivalent. For cases in which an agency is developing a rule to be issued jointly with another agency, each agency
submits a separate entry to the Unified Agenda, which leads to duplicate search results. CRS attempted to eliminate
these duplicate search results, and the number of final rules provided here is the number of rules expected, not the
number of entries in the Unified Agenda. The joint rules are listed at the end of the Appendix.
Congressional Research Service
8

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Notable Final Rules
As mentioned above, rules may be notable for a variety of reasons; several examples of notable
upcoming final rules are listed in the section below.
Rules Included in the Regulatory Plan
Three of the ACA regulations that were listed in the final rule section of the Unified Agenda were
considered important enough to be included in the agencies’ regulatory plans:36
• an ATBCB rule on “Accessibility Standards for Medical Diagnostic Equipment,”
which the agency expects to issue as a final rule in March 2014;
• an HHS/FDA rule on “Food Labeling: Nutrition Labeling for Food Sold in
Vending Machines,” which the agency expected to issue as a final rule in
September 2013 but had not been published as of December 2, 2013; and
• an upcoming HHS/FDA rule on “Food Labeling: Nutrition Labeling of Standard
Menu Items in Restaurants and Similar Retail Food Establishments,” which the
agency expected to issue as a final rule in September 2013 but had not been
published as of December 2, 2013.
“Economically Significant” or “Major” Final Rules
In addition to the three final rules that were listed in the regulatory plan, the Unified Agenda
listed six entries in the proposed rule section that were considered “economically significant” and
“major” (i.e., that were expected to have at least a $100 million annual effect on the economy).
These six rules were
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Home and Community-Based State Plan Services
Program and Provider Payment Reassignments,” which the agency expected to
issue as a final rule in November 2013 but had not been published as of
December 2, 2013;
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Face-to-Face Requirements for Home Health Services;
Policy Changes and Clarifications Related to Home Health,” which the agency
expected to issue as a final rule in October 2013 but had not been published as of
December 2, 2013;
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Covered Outpatient Drugs,” which the agency expected to
issue as a final rule in January 2014;
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Medicaid, Exchanges, and Children’s Health Insurance
Programs,” which the agency issued as a final rule on July 15, 2013;37

36 As stated earlier, Executive Order 12866 requires that each agency prepare, as part of the fall edition of the Unified
Agenda, a “regulatory plan” of the most important significant regulatory actions that the agency reasonably expects to
issue in proposed or final form during the upcoming fiscal year.
37 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Medicaid and
Children’s Health Insurance Programs: Essential Health Benefits in Alternative Benefit Plans, Eligibility Notices, Fair
Hearing and Appeal Processes, and Premiums and Cost Sharing; Exchanges: Eligibility and Enrollment; Final Rule,”
78 Federal Register 42159, July 15, 2013.
Congressional Research Service
9

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

• an HHS/CMS rule on “Exchange Functions: Eligibility for Exemptions;
Miscellaneous Minimum Essential Coverage Provisions,” which the agency
issued as a final rule on July 1, 2013;38 and
• a DOL/EBSA rule on “Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating
to Coverage of Preventive Services,” which the agency issued as a final rule on
July 2, 2013.39
Other Significant Final Rules
In addition to the above-mentioned rules, 11 other entries in the proposed rule section of the
Unified Agenda were characterized as “other significant,” indicating that although they were not
listed in the regulatory plan or expected to be “economically significant,” they were expected to
be significant enough to be reviewed by OIRA under Executive Order 12866. The “other
significant” final rules include
• an HHS/CMS, DOL/EBSA, and TREAS/IRS rule on “Certain Preventive
Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” which the agencies issued as a final
rule on July 2, 2013;40
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Exchange Functions: Standards for Navigators and Non-
Navigator Assistance Personnel,” which the agency issued as a final rule on July
17, 2013;41
• an HHS/OS rule on “Health and Human Services Acquisition Regulation (HHS’
Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation),” which the agency expected
to issue as an interim final rule by July 2013 but had not been published as of
December 2, 2013;
• a DOL/OSHA rule on “Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation Complaints
under Section 1558 of the Affordable Care Act of 2010,” which the agency
expects to issue as a final rule in February 2014;
• a DOL/OWCP rule on “Regulations Implementing Amendments to the Black
Lung Benefits Act: Determining Coal Miners and Survivors Entitlement to
Benefits,” which the agency published as a final rule on September 25, 2013;42
and

38 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act; Exchange Functions: Eligibility for Exemptions; Miscellaneous Minimum Essential Coverage
Provisions,” 78 Federal Register 39493, July 1, 2013.
39 U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal
Revenue Service, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
“Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” 78 Federal Register 39870, July 2, 2013.
The Federal Register publication of the final rule lists DOL/EBSA, USTREAS/IRS, and HHS/CMS as jointly issuing
this rule. Within the Unified Agenda, however, only DOL/EBSA identified the rule as “major” or “economically
significant.” HHS/CMS identified the rule as “other significant.”
40 Ibid.
41 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act; Exchange Functions: Standards for Navigators and Non-Navigator Assistance Personnel;
Consumer Assistance Tools and Programs of an Exchange and Certified Application Counselors,” 78 Federal Register
42823, July 17, 2013.
42 U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, “Regulations Implementing the Byrd
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
10

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

• an SSA rule on “Conforming Changes to Regulations Regarding Income-Related
Monthly Adjustment Amounts to Medicare Part B Premiums,” which the agency
issued as an interim final rule on September 18, 2013.43
Effects on Small Entities
Four of the final rules listed in the Spring 2013 Unified Agenda are expected to trigger or
triggered the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. §602) because of their
effects on small businesses:
• an HHS/FDA rule on “Food Labeling: Nutrition Labeling for Food Sold in
Vending Machines,” which the agency expected to issue as a final rule in
September 2013 but had not been published as of December 2, 2013;
• an HHS/FDA rule on “Food Labeling: Nutrition Labeling of Standard Menu
Items in Restaurants and Similar Retail Food Establishments,” which the agency
expected to issue as a final rule in September 2013 but had not been published as
of December 2, 2013;
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Covered Outpatient Drugs,” which the agency expects to
issue in January 2014; and
• a TREAS/IRS rule on “Special Rules Under the Additional Medicare Tax,” which
was published as a final rule in November 2013.44
Three of the rules listed above—the two FDA rules on “Food Labeling” and the TREAS/IRS rule
on “Medicare Tax”—are also expected to have an effect on small governmental jurisdictions,
another potential trigger for the Regulatory Flexibility Act’s analysis requirement. The
TREAS/IRS rule on “Medicare Tax” is also expected to trigger the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act because of its effect on small not-for-profit organizations.
In six other upcoming final rules, the agencies indicated that they had yet to determine whether a
regulatory flexibility analysis would be triggered. These rules were
• an HHS/CMS, DOL/EBSA, and TREAS/IRS rule on “Certain Preventive
Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” which was published as a final rule on
July 2, 2013;45

(...continued)
Amendments to the Black Lung Benefits Act: Determining Coal Miners’ and Survivors’ Entitlement to Benefits,” 78
Federal Register 59102, September 25, 2013.
43 Social Security Administration, “Medicare Determinations and Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amounts to
Medicare Part B Premiums; Conforming Changes to Regulations,” 78 Federal Register 57257, September 18, 2013.
44 U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, “Rules Relating to Additional Medicare Tax,” 78
Federal Register 71468, November 29, 2013.
45 U.S. Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal
Revenue Service, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
“Coverage of Certain Preventive Services Under the Affordable Care Act,” 78 Federal Register 39870, July 2, 2013.
The Federal Register publication of the final rule lists DOL/EBSA, USTREAS/IRS, and HHS/CMS as jointly issuing
this rule. Within the Unified Agenda, however, only DOL/EBSA identified the rule as “major” or “economically
significant.” HHS/CMS identified the rule as “other significant.”
Congressional Research Service
11

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

• an HHS/OS rule on “Health and Human Services Acquisition Regulation (HHS’
Supplement to the Federal Acquisition Regulation),” which the agency expected
to publish in July 2013 but had not yet published as of December 2, 2013;
• a DOL/EBSA rule on “Ninety-Day Waiting Period Limitation and Technical
Amendments to Certain Health Coverage Requirements,” which the agency
expects to issue jointly with HHS/CMS and TREAS/IRS in December 2013;
• a DOL/OWCP rule on “Regulations Implementing Amendments to the Black
Lung Benefits Act,” which the agency published as a final rule on September 25,
2013;46
• a TREAS/IRS rule on “Shared Responsibility for Employers Regarding Health
Coverage,” which the agency expects to publish in December 2013; and
• an ATBCB rule on “Accessibility Standards for Medical Diagnostic Equipment,”
which the agency expects to issue as a final rule in March 2014.
ACA Long-Term Actions
As noted earlier in this report, the Unified Agenda also identifies “long-term actions” (i.e.,
regulatory actions that are under development which the agencies do not expect to take action on
in the next 12 months). The July 3, 2013, edition of the Unified Agenda listed 13 long-term
actions related to ACA. In comparison to the proposed and final rules previously discussed, it is
somewhat less clear when the ACA-related long-term actions are expected to occur. In 4 of the 13
long-term actions listed, the agencies said that the dates for the actions were “to be determined.”
Of the nine remaining long-term actions for which agencies provided an estimated date of
publication, one is expected to be published as an ANPRM in 2014:
• a Department of Justice (DOJ)/Civil Rights Division (CRT) advance notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) on “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Disability by State and Local Governments and Public Accommodations:
Accessibility of Medical Equipment and Furniture” (expected in 2014).
The remaining eight long-term actions are expected to have an NPRM, ANPRM, or an interim
final rule published in the Federal Register in 2014 or 2015.
The rules with final action expected in 2014 include
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Medicare Shared Savings Program; Final Waivers”
(expected in November 2014);
• a TREAS/IRS rule on “Requirements for Group Health Plans and Health
Insurance Issuers Under the PPACA Relating to Preexisting Condition
Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits, Rescissions, and Patient Protections ”
(expected in July 2014);

46 U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, “Regulations Implementing the Byrd
Amendments to the Black Lung Benefits Act: Determining Coal Miners’ and Survivors’ Entitlement to Benefits,” 78
Federal Register 59102, September 25, 2013.
Congressional Research Service
12

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

• a TREAS/IRS rule on “Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers
Providing Dependent Coverage of Children to Age 26 Under the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act” (expected in December 2014); and
• a TREAS/IRS rule on “Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules
Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act” (expected in December 2014).
The regulatory action expected in 2015 is
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Reporting and Returning of Overpayments” (expected in
2015).
Notable Long-Term Actions
None of the ACA-related long-term actions were identified as “economically significant” or
“major.”
The agencies considered 5 of the 13 long-term actions to be “other significant,” meaning that the
agencies considered them significant enough to be reviewed by OIRA under Executive Order
12866, but not “economically significant.” These actions were
• an HHS/HRSA rule on “340B Drug Pricing Program; Administrative Dispute
Resolution Process”;
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Reporting and Returning of Overpayments”;
• an HHS/CMS rule on “Medicare Shared Savings Program; Final Waivers”;
• a DOJ/CRT rule on “Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by State and
Local Governments and Public Accommodations: Accessibility of Medical
Equipment and Furniture”; and
• a DOL/EBSA rule on “Automatic Enrollment in Health Plans of Employees of
Large Employers Under FLSA Section 18A.”
Congressional Oversight Options
As noted earlier in this report, when federal agencies issue substantive regulations, they are
carrying out legislative authority delegated to them by Congress. Therefore, Congress often
oversees the rules that agencies issue to ensure that they are consistent with congressional intent
and various rulemaking requirements. In order for Congress to oversee the rules issued pursuant
to ACA, Congress must first know that they are being issued—ideally as early as possible. The
Unified Agenda is perhaps the best vehicle to provide that early information, describing not only
what rules are expected to be issued, but also providing information regarding their significance
and timing.
Congress has a range of tools available to oversee the rules that federal agencies are expected to
issue to implement ACA, including oversight hearings and confirmation hearings for the heads of
regulatory agencies. Individual Members of Congress may also participate in the rulemaking
Congressional Research Service
13

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

process by, among other things, meeting with agency officials and filing public comments.47
Congress, committees, and individual Members can also request that the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) evaluate the agencies’ rulemaking activities.
Another option is the Congressional Review Act (CRA, 5 U.S.C. §§801-808), which was enacted
in 1996 to establish procedures detailing congressional authority over rulemaking “without at the
same time requiring Congress to become a super regulatory agency.”48 The act generally requires
federal agencies to submit all of their covered final rules to both houses of Congress and GAO
before they can take effect.49 It also established expedited legislative procedures (primarily in the
Senate) by which Congress may disapprove agencies’ final rules by enacting a joint resolution of
disapproval.50 The definition of a covered rule in the CRA is quite broad, arguably including any
type of document (e.g., legislative rules, policy statements, guidance, manuals, and memoranda)
that the agency wishes to make binding on the affected public.51 After these rules are submitted,
Congress can use the expedited procedures specified in the CRA to disapprove any of the rules.
CRA resolutions of disapproval must be presented to the President for signature or veto.
For a variety of reasons, however, the CRA has been used to disapprove of 1 rule in the 17 years
since it was enacted.52 Perhaps most notably, it is likely that a President would veto a resolution
of disapproval to protect rules developed under his own Administration, and it may be difficult
for Congress to muster the two-thirds vote in both houses needed to overturn the veto. Congress
can also use regular (i.e., non-CRA) legislative procedures to disapprove agencies’ rules, but such
legislation may prove even more difficult to enact than a CRA resolution of disapproval
(primarily because of the lack of expedited procedures in the Senate), and if enacted could be
subject to presidential veto.
Finally, outside of the CRA, Congress has regularly included provisions in the text of agencies’
appropriations bills in order to influence the regulatory process.53 Such provisions include
prohibitions on the finalization of particular proposed rules, restrictions on certain types of

47 For example, in Sierra Club v. Costle (657 F.2d 298, D.C. Cir. 1981), the D.C. Circuit concluded (at 409) that it was
“entirely proper for congressional representatives vigorously to represent the interests of their constituents before
administrative agencies engaged in informal, general policy rulemaking, so long as the individual Members of
Congress do not frustrate the intent of Congress as a whole as expressed in statute, nor undermine applicable rules of
procedure.”
48 Joint statement of House and Senate Sponsors, Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 142 (April 19, 1996), p.
E571, and Congressional Record, daily edition, vol. 142 (April 18, 1996), p. S3683.
49 If a rule is considered “major” (e.g., has a $100 million annual effect on the economy), then the CRA generally
prohibits it from taking effect until 60 days after the date that it is submitted to Congress.
50 For a detailed discussion of CRA procedures, see CRS Report RL31160, Disapproval of Regulations by Congress:
Procedure Under the Congressional Review Act, by Richard S. Beth.
51 The CRA provides for three exceptions to the definition of the term “rule.” Under 5 U.S.C. §804(3), the term “rule”
does not include “(A) any rule of particular applicability, including a rule that approves or prescribes for the future
rates, wages, prices, services, or allowances therefor, corporate or financial structures, reorganizations, mergers, or
acquisitions thereof, or accounting practices or disclosures bearing on any of the foregoing; (B) any rule relating to
agency management or personnel; or (C) any rule of agency organization, procedure, or practice that does not
substantially affect the rights or obligations of non-agency parties.”
52 The rule overturned in March 2001 was the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s ergonomics standard.
This reversal was the result of a unique set of circumstances in which the incoming President (George W. Bush) did not
veto the resolution disapproving the outgoing President’s (William J. Clinton’s) rule.
53 For more information on the use of appropriations restrictions, see CRS Report R41634, Limitations in
Appropriations Measures: An Overview of Procedural Issues, by Jessica Tollestrup.
Congressional Research Service
14

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

regulatory activity, and restrictions on implementation or enforcement of certain provisions.
Appropriations provisions can also be used to prompt agencies to issue certain regulations or to
require that certain procedures be followed before or after their issuance. The inclusion of
regulatory provisions in appropriations legislation as a matter of legislative strategy appears to
arise from two factors: (1) Congress’s ability via its “power of the purse” to control agency
action, and (2) the fact that appropriations bills are usually considered “must pass” legislation.
Congress’s use of regulatory appropriations restrictions has fluctuated somewhat over time.54
This report’s Appendix lists the ACA proposed and final rules from the Spring 2013 Unified
Agenda in a table. For each proposed and final rule listed, the table identifies the department and
agency expected to issue the rule, the title of the rule and its RIN, an abstract describing the
nature of the rulemaking action, and the date that the proposed or final rule is expected to be
issued or was issued.55 The abstracts presented in the table were taken verbatim from the Unified
Agenda entries. Within the proposed and final rule sections of the table, the entries are organized
by agency. The table includes only those Unified Agenda entries in which the Affordable Care
Act was mentioned.



54 Ibid., p. 35. This report indicated that some appropriations restrictions were repeated every year for 10 years, some
were repeated several years in a row but then stopped, and some appeared in only one appropriations bill. Some
restrictions appeared to be intended to stop particular rules issued at the end of presidential administrations.
55 In addition to the RINs, CMS included an agency-specific number as part of the title of the rule (e.g., CMS-2327-F).
Those numbers are included as part of the title in the table in the Appendix.
Congressional Research Service
15

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act: Fall 2011 Unified Agenda

Appendix. Upcoming Proposed and Final Rules Pursuant to the Affordable
Care Act
Department/
Expected
Agency
Title of Rule (RIN)
Abstract, as Provided in the Unified Agenda
Publication Date
Proposed Rules
HHS/HRSA
Teaching Health Center
This proposed rule is required under the Affordable Care Act and would create regulations
06/2014
Graduate Medical
governing the eligibility, payment amount, reconciliation, and annual reporting for the Teaching
Education Program (0906-
Health Centers Graduate Medical Education Program.
AA98)
HHS/CMS Administrative
This proposed rule would implement provisions of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 under
09/2013
Simplification: Compliance:
Administrative Simplification to certify that data and information systems are in compliance
Health Plan Certification
with any applicable standards and associated operating rules for electronic funds transfers,
Note: Legal deadline for final
(CMS-0037-P) (0938-
eligibility for a health plan, health claim status, and health care payment and remittance advice.
rule is 12/31/2013. No
AQ85)
NPRM had been published as
of 12/02/2013.
HHS/CMS Disproportionate
Share This final rule would delineate the statutory aggregate reductions to State Medicaid
NPRM was published on
Hospital Payment
Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) al otments from FYs 2014 through 2015. The annual
05/15/2013 (78 F.R. 28551).
Reduction (CMS-2367-F)
reduction amounts will be implemented using a DSH Health Reform methodology determined
Final rule was published on
(0938-AR31)
by the Secretary.
09/18/2013 (78 F.R. 57293).
Note: Legal deadline for final
rule was 10/01/2013.
HHS/CMS
Changes to the End-Stage
This annual proposed rule would update the bundled payment system for end stage renal
NPRM was published on
Renal Disease Prospective
disease (ESRD) facilities as required by MIPPA, the Affordable Care Act, and the American
07/08/2013 (78 F.R. 40836).
Payment System for CY
Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. These changes would be applicable to services furnished on or
Final rule was published
2014 (CMS-1526-P) (0938-
after January 1 [2014].
12/02/2013 (78 F.R. 72155).
AR55)
Note: Legal deadline for final
rule was 11/01/2013.
HHS/CMS
Reform of Requirements
This proposed rule would reform the Medicare conditions of participation for long-term care
12/2013
for Long-Term Care
facilities to reflect significant changes in the industry and remove obsolete or unnecessary
Facilities and Quality
provisions. In addition, under the Affordable Act, this rule would propose to expand the level
Note: No NPRM had been
Assurance and
and scope of required QAPI activities to ensure that facilities continuously identify and correct
published as of 12/02/2013.
Performance Improvement
quality deficiencies as well as promote and sustain performance improvement.
(QAPI) Program (CMS-
3260-P) (0938-AR61)
CRS-16

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act: Fall 2011 Unified Agenda

Department/
Expected
Agency
Title of Rule (RIN)
Abstract, as Provided in the Unified Agenda
Publication Date
HHS/CMS Prospective
Payment The Affordable Care Act amends the current Medicare FQHC payment policy by requiring the NPRM was published on
System for Federally
establishment of a new payment system, effective with cost reporting periods beginning on or
09/23/2013 (78 F.R. 58386).
Qualified Health Centers
after October 1, 2014. This rule proposes the establishment of the new prospective payment
(FQHCs) (CMS-1443-P)
system.
Note: Legal deadline for final
(0938-AR62)
rule was 10/01/2014.
HHS/CMS Exchanges:
Additional Under the Affordable Care Act, this proposed rule sets forth standards for agents, brokers,
NPRM was published on
Program Implementation
and qualified health plan (QHP) issuers in Federally-facilitated Exchanges (FFEs); State
06/19/2013 (78 F.R. 37032).
(CMS-9957-P) (0938-
Exchanges; the Smal Business Health Options Program (SHOP); risk adjustment, reinsurance,
AR82)
and risk corridors programs; advance payments of the premium tax credit (APTC); and cost-
Note: Legal deadline for final
sharing reductions (CSRs). This proposed rule would also implement additional standards for
rule is 01/01/2014. Final
enrol ment in a QHP, the establishment and operation of the SHOP, cases related to QHPs
rules were published on
and QHP issuers, the use of a standard health plan identifier for routing electronic enrol ment
08/30/2013 (78 F.R. 54070)
and payment transactions, and standards for the use of HHS-approved survey vendors.
and 10/30/2013 (78 F.R.
65046).
HHS/CMS
Establishment of Appeals
This proposed rule would establish an appeals process for Parts C and D RAC determinations.
02/2014
Process for Medicare Part
The Medicare Parts C and D RAC program was authorized under the Affordable Care Act.
C and Part D Recovery
No process currently exists for Parts C and D contractors to appeal the findings of RACs.
Audit Contractor (RAC)
Determinations (CMS-
6052-P) (0938-AR86)
HHS/CMS
CY 2015 Notice of Benefit
This proposed rule would establish the CY 2015 payment parameters for the cost-sharing
NPRM was published on
and Payment Parameters
reductions, advance premium tax credit, reinsurance, and risk adjustment programs as
12/02/2013 (78 F.R. 72321).
(CMS-9954-P) (0938-
required by the Affordable Care Act.
AR89)
Note: Legal deadline for final
rule is 01/01/2014. Proposed
and final rule must precede
plan approval and open
enrol ment.
HHS/CMS
Establishment of the Basic
Under the Affordable Care Act, this proposed rule would establish the Basic Health Program.
NPRM was published on
Health Program (CMS-
Under this program, States could offer public health insurance to individuals whose incomes
09/25/2013 (78 F.R. 59122).
2380-P) (0938-AR93)
are too high to qualify for Medicaid, but are also below 200% of the Federal poverty level.
Note: Legal deadline for final
rule is 01/01/2014.
HHS/OCR Nondiscrimination
Under
This proposed rule would implement prohibitions against discrimination on the basis of race,
12/2013
the Patient Protection and
color, national origin, sex, age, and disability, as provided in section 1557 of the Affordable
Affordable Care Act (0945-
Care Act. Section 1557 provides certain protections from discrimination by recipients of
Note: No NPRM had been
AA02)
Federal financial assistance, federally conducted programs, and entities established under title I
published as of 12/02/2013.
of the Affordable Care Act. This section also identifies additional forms of Federal financial
assistance to which the section will apply.
CRS-17

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act: Fall 2011 Unified Agenda

Department/
Expected
Agency
Title of Rule (RIN)
Abstract, as Provided in the Unified Agenda
Publication Date
TREAS/IRS
Fees on Health Insurance
The proposed regulations provide guidance under sections 4375 to 4377 of the Internal
12/2013
and Self-Insured Plans
Revenue Code, as added by section 6301 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
(1545-BK59)
on fees imposed on health insurance and self-insured health plans.
Note: Final rule was
published on 12/06/2012 (77
F.R. 72721).
TREAS/IRS
Medical Loss Ratio for
The proposed regulations will provide guidance under section 833(c)(5) of the Internal
NPRM was published on
Section 833 Organizations
Revenue Code, as added by section 9016 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
05/13/2013 (78 F.R. 27873).
(1545-BL05)
on the 85 percent medical loss ratio requirement under section 833.
TREAS/IRS
Reporting and Notice
Proposed regulations under section 6056 of the Internal Revenue Code, as enacted by the
NPRM was published on
Requirements Under
Affordable Care Act, to provide guidance on rules that require applicable large employers to
09/09/2013 (78 F.R. 54996).
Section 6056 (1545-BL26)
file certain information with the Internal Revenue Service on coverage under an eligible
employer-sponsored health plan and furnish to individuals statements that set forth the
information required to be reported to the Internal Revenue Service.
TREAS/IRS Community
Health
Needs
The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking contains proposed regulations that provide guidance to
NPRM was published on
Assessments for Charitable charitable hospital organizations on the community health needs assessment requirements, and 04/05/2013 (78 F.R. 20523);
Hospitals (1545-BL30)
related excise tax and reporting obligations, enacted in the Patient Protection and Affordable
corrections were
Care Act of 2010. The proposed regulations also clarify the consequences for failing to meet
subsequently published (see
these requirements, as well as additional requirements related to financial assistance, charges,
78 F.R. 31454 and 78 F.R.
and billing and collections. The proposed regulations will affect charitable hospital
29628).
organizations.
TREAS/IRS
Tax Credit for Employee
Proposed regulations under section 45R of the Internal Revenue Code, as enacted by the
NPRM was published on
Health Insurance Expenses
Affordable Care Act, that set forth the requirements for certain small employers to claim a tax 08/26/2013 (78 F.R. 52719).
of Smal Employer (1545-
credit when providing health insurance coverage to their employees through an Exchange.
BL55)
OPM
Federal Employees’ Group
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) proposes to amend the Federal Employees
03/2014
Life Insurance Program;
Group Life Insurance regulations at 5 CFR part 870 to include enrollments for eligible
Tribes and Tribal
employees of tribes and tribal organizations under the provisions of the Affordable Care Act
Organizations (3206-
of 2010.
AM41)
OPM
Federal Employees’ Health
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) proposes to amend the Federal Employees
02/2014
Benefits Program; Tribes
Health Benefits (FEHB) regulations at 5 CFR part 890 to include enrollments for eligible
and Tribal
employees of tribes and tribal organizations under the provisions of the Affordable Care Act
Organizations (3206-
of 2010.
AM40)
CRS-18

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act: Fall 2011 Unified Agenda

Department/
Expected
Agency
Title of Rule (RIN)
Abstract, as Provided in the Unified Agenda
Publication Date
OPM
Federal Employees’ Health
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) proposes to amend the Federal Employees
12/2013
Benefits Program; Disputed Health Benefits (FEHB) regulations at 5 CFR part 890 to include changes to resolution of
Claims and External
disputed health claims and to provide for external review under the provisions of the
Note: No NPRM had been
Review Requirements
Affordable Care Act of 2010.
published as of 12/02/2013.
(3206-AM42)
OPM
Federal Employees’ Health
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) proposes to amend the Federal Employees
02/2014
Benefits Program:
Health Benefits (FEHB) regulations at 5 CFR part 890 to include changes under the provisions
Miscellaneous Changes
of the Affordable Care Act of 2010.
Proposed by the
Affordable Care Act (3206-
AM46)
Final Rules



HHS/HRSA
Designation of Medically
The Affordable Care Act required the Secretary to establish a rulemaking committee to draft
03/2014
Underserved Populations
an interim final rule for designation of Medically Underserved Populations (MUPs) and Primary
and Health Professional
Care Health Professions Shortage Areas (HPSAs). The rulemaking committee was unable to
Note: On 2/29/2008, HRSA
Shortage Areas (0906-
reach the consensus required to produce an interim final rule for the Secretary’s review and
announced (73 F.R. 42743)
AA44)
approval. However, the Affordable Care Act still requires the Secretary to issue an interim
its intention to publish an
final rule at some point in the future.
additional NPRM, following
the second NPRM (73 F.R.
11232). The Spring 2013
Unified Agenda indicated the
rule will be an interim final
rule rather than another
NPRM.
HHS/HRSA
National Practitioner Data
This final rule updates the cross-reference cited in the Privacy Act regulations at 45 CFR
Final rule was published on
Bank and Privacy Act;
5b.11(b)(i )(L), from section 60.16 to section 60.21. The National Practitioner Data Bank
08/05/2013 (78 F.R. 47210).
Exempt Records System;
(NPDB) system of records (09-15-0054) is exempt from certain provisions of the Privacy Act
Technical Correction
at 45 CFR 5b.11(b)(2)(ii)(L), and the cross-reference cited in this section refers to the
Note: Legal deadline for final
(0906-AA97)
regulations that govern the NPDB. As a result of section 6403 of the Affordable Care Act, the
rule was 03/2011.
regulations governing the NPDB were revised and certain section numbers in the NPDB
regulations were changed, including the NPDB regulation cross-referenced at 45 CFR
5b.11(b)(2)(ii)(L). This change is technical in nature and does not significantly alter the current
NPDB exemption at 45 CFR 5b.11(b)(2)(ii)(L).
CRS-19

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act: Fall 2011 Unified Agenda

Department/
Expected
Agency
Title of Rule (RIN)
Abstract, as Provided in the Unified Agenda
Publication Date
HHS/FDA
Food Labeling: Calorie
FDA published a proposed rule to establish requirements for nutrition labeling of certain food
09/2013
Labeling of Articles of Food items sold in certain vending machines. FDA also proposed the terms and conditions for
Sold in Vending Machines
vending machine operators registering to voluntarily be subject to the requirements. FDA is
Note: NPRM was published
(0910-AG56)
issuing a final rule, and taking this action to carry out section 4205 of the Patient Protection
on 04/06/2011 (76 F.R.
and Affordable Care Act.
19238). The final rule had
not been published as of
12/02/2013.
HHS/FDA
Food Labeling: Nutrition
FDA published a proposed rule in the Federal Register to establish requirements for nutrition
09/2013
Labeling of Standard Menu
labeling of standard menu items in chain restaurants and similar retail food establishments.
Items in Restaurants and
FDA also proposed the terms and conditions for restaurants and similar retail food
Note: NPRM was published
Similar Retail Food
establishments registering to voluntarily be subject to the Federal requirements. FDA is issuing
on 04/06/2011 (76 F.R.
Establishments (0910-
a final rule, and taking this action to carry out section 4205 of the Patient Protection and
19192); comment period
AG57)
Affordable Care Act.
was extended on 05/24/2011
(76 F.R. 30051). The final
rule had not been published
as of 12/02/2013.
HHS/CMS
Home and Community-
This final rule amends the Medicaid regulations to define and describe State plan home and
11/2013
Based State Plan Services
community-based services (HCBS) under the Affordable Care Act. This rule offers States
Program and Provider
flexibilities in providing necessary and appropriate services to elderly and disabled populations. Note: Original NPRM was
Payment Reassignments
published on 04/04/08 (73
(CMS-2249-F) (0938-
F.R. 18676). Following
AO53)
enactment of ACA, a second
NPRM was published on
05/03/2012 (77 F.R. 26362).
Under the Deficit Reduction
Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-171),
the original legal deadline for
final rule was 01/01/2007.
The final rule had not been
published as of 12/02/2013.
HHS/CMS Face-to-Face
Requirements
This final rule revises the Medicaid home health service definition as required by section 6407
10/2013
for Home Health Services;
of the Affordable Care Act of 2010 to add a requirement that physicians document the
Policy Changes and
existence of a face-to-face encounter (including through the use of tele-health) with the
Note: NPRM was published
Clarifications Related to
Medicaid eligible individual within reasonable timeframes. In addition, this rule amends home
on 07/12/2011 (76 F.R.
Home Health (CMS-2348-
health services regulations to clarify the definitions of included medical supplies, equipment and 41032). The final rule had
F) (0938-AQ36)
appliances, and clarify that States may not limit home health services to services delivered in
not been published as of
the home, or to services furnished to individuals who are homebound.
12/02/2013.
CRS-20

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act: Fall 2011 Unified Agenda

Department/
Expected
Agency
Title of Rule (RIN)
Abstract, as Provided in the Unified Agenda
Publication Date
HHS/CMS
Covered Outpatient Drugs
This final rule revises requirements pertaining to Medicaid reimbursement for covered
01/2014
(CMS-2345-F) (0938-
outpatient drugs to implement provisions of the Affordable Care Act. This rule also revises
AQ41)
other requirements related to covered outpatient drugs, including key aspects of Medicaid
Note: NPRM was published
coverage, payment, and the drug rebate program.
on 02/02/2012 (77 F.R.
5318). Legal deadline for
final rule was 01/01/2010.
HHS/CMS
Medicaid, Exchanges, and
The Affordable Care Act expands access to health insurance through improvements in
Final rules were published
Children’s Health
Medicaid, the establishment of Affordable Insurance Exchanges (Exchanges), and coordination
on 07/15/2013 (78 F.R.
Insurance Programs:
between Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and Exchanges. This rule
42159) and 07/17/2013 (78
Eligibility, Appeals, and
continues CMS efforts to assist States in implementing Medicaid eligibility, appeals, enrollment
F.R. 42824).
Other Provisions Under
changes, and other State health subsidy programs.
the Affordable Care Act
Note: Legal deadline for final
(CMS-2334-F) (0938-
rule is 01/2014. NPRM was
AR04)
published 01/22/2013 (78
F.R. 4593).
HHS/CMS Exchange
Functions: This final rule implements provisions of the Affordable Care Act concerning verifications of
Final rule was published on
Eligibility for Exemptions;
employer-sponsored coverage eligibility for the purpose of determining an individual’s eligibility 07/01/2013 (78 F.R. 39493).
Miscellaneous Minimum
for advanced premium tax credits (APTCs).
Essential Coverage
Note: Legal deadline for final
Provisions (CMS-9958-
rule is 01/01/2014. NPRM
F) (0938-AR68)
was published on 02/01/2013
(78 F.R. 7348).
HHS/CMS
Patient Protection and
This final rule would establish standards for Navigators providing in-person assistance through
Final rule was published on
Affordable Care Act;
an Exchange Navigator Program and non-Navigator assistance personnel in Federally
07/17/2013 (78 F.R. 42823).
Exchange Functions:
Facilitated Exchanges (FFEs) and State Partnership Exchanges (SPEs) and non-Navigator
Standards for Navigators
assistance personnel in State-based Exchanges that are funded through federal Exchange
Note: NPRM was published
and Non-Navigator
Establishment grants. The Affordable Care Act requires each Exchange to develop and
on 04/05/2013 (78 F.R.
Assistance Personnel
implement Navigator grant programs, which will help consumers understand new programs,
20581).
(CMS-9955-F) (0938-
avail themselves of new protections, and navigate the system to find the most affordable
AR75)
coverage that meets their needs.
HHS/OS
Health and Human Services HHS is amending its Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) supplement—the HHS Acquisition
07/2013
Acquisition Regulation
Regulation (HHSAR)—to add four new clauses, 352.203-70 Anti-Lobbying, 352.204-16
(HHS’ Supplement to the
Prevention and Public Health Fund –Reporting Requirements, 352.231-70 Salary Rate
Note: Legal deadline for
Federal Acquisition
Limitation, and 352.237-73 Nondiscrimination in Service Delivery, and their respective
interim final rule was
Regulation) (0991-AB88)
prescriptions at 303.808-70, 304.1602, 331.101-70, and 337.103-70(d) as wel as amending
07/2013. The final rule had
related regulations at 303.808-70, 304.16, 304.1600, 304.1601, 304.1602, 305.8, 305.801,
not been published as of
305.802, 305.803, 305.804, 305.805, 331.101-70, 335.017-2, 337.103-70(d). This interim final
12/02/2013.
rule amends the Department’s FAR Supplement—the HHS Acquisition Regulation (HHSAR)—
to provide implementation guidance for provisions in the HHS FY2012 Appropriations Acts
and to establish HHS’ nondiscrimination policy.
CRS-21

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act: Fall 2011 Unified Agenda

Department/
Expected
Agency
Title of Rule (RIN)
Abstract, as Provided in the Unified Agenda
Publication Date
DOL/EBSA Incentives
for
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the Affordable Care Act) amended
Final rule was published on
Nondiscriminatory
title I of ERISA, by adding a new section 715 which encompasses various health reform
06/03/2013 (78 F.R. 33157).
Wellness Programs in
provisions of the Public Health Service Act. These regulations provide guidance on wellness
Group Health Plans (1210-
programs.
Note: NPRM was published
AB55)
on 11/26/2012 (77 F.R.
70619).
DOL/OSHA
Procedures for the
OSHA is proposing to promulgate procedures for the handling and investigation of retaliation
02/2014
Handling of Retaliation
complaints pursuant to Section 1558 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of
Complaints under Section
2010 (the Affordable Care Act or ACA). This section established a new whistleblower
Interim final rule was
1558 of the Affordable
protection statute to be administered by OSHA that provides protection from retaliation to
published on 02/27/2013 (78
Care Act of 2010 (1218-
employees in the health care industry who engage in protected activities under the ACA.
F.R. 13222).
AC79)
Pursuant to the statute, the procedures will follow those enacted under the Consumer
Product Safety Improvement Act, 15 U.S.C. 2087(b), including remedies and legal burdens of
proof provisions. Promulgation of a regulation is necessary to govern whistleblower
investigations conducted under the new statute.
DOL/OWCP Regulations
Implementing The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010 amended the Black Lung
Final rule was published on
Amendments to the Black
Benefits Act, 30 U.S.C. 901 to 944, to reinstate two methods of establishing entitlement that
09/25/2013 (78 F.R. 59102).
Lung Benefits Act:
were repealed with respect to claims filed after 1981. Specifically, the PPACA reinstated 30
Determining Coal Miners
U.S.C. 921(c)(4)(presumption of total disability or death due to pneumoconiosis arising out of
Note: NPRM was published
and Survivors Entitlement
coal mine employment where the miner had 15 years of coal mine employment and proof of
on 03/30/2012 (77 F.R.
to Benefits (1240-AA04)
total disability) and 30 U.S.C. 932(l) (automatic entitlement to benefits for eligible survivors of
19455).
miners who were awarded benefits based on lifetime claims). The newly amended statutory

provisions apply to claims filed after January 1, 2005, that are pending on or after PPACA’s
March 23, 2010, enactment date, and to all claims filed on or after March 23, 2010. This final
rule will define the class of claims affected by the amendments and set the criteria for
establishing entitlement to benefits under the amendments.
TREAS/IRS
Branded Prescription Drug
Implementation of section 9008 applies to imposition of annual fee on branded prescription
06/2014
Fee (1545-BJ39)
pharmaceutical manufacturers and importers, of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act of 2010, P.L. 111-148.
Note: NPRM was published
on 08/18/2011 (76 F.R.
51310).
TREAS/IRS
Special Rules Under the
Proposed amendments of sections 31.3101, 31.3102, 31.3111, 31.3121, 1.1401, 31.6205,
Final rule was published on
Additional Medicare Tax
31.6011, 31.6205, 31.6402, and 31.6413 of the Employment Tax Regulations provide guidance
11/29/2013 (78 F.R. 71468).
(1545-BK54)
for employers and employees relating to the implementation of the Additional Medicare Tax,
as enacted by the Affordable Care Act, and correction procedures for errors related to the
Note: NPRM was published
Additional Medicare Tax.
on 12/05/2012 (77 F.R.
72268).
CRS-22

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act: Fall 2011 Unified Agenda

Department/
Expected
Agency
Title of Rule (RIN)
Abstract, as Provided in the Unified Agenda
Publication Date
TREAS/IRS
Health Insurance Provider
The proposed regulations provide guidance on the annual fee imposed on covered entities
Final rule was published on
Fees (1545-BL20)
engaged in the business of providing health insurance for United States health risks. This fee
11/29/2013 (78 F.R. 71476).
was enacted by section 9010 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148),
as amended by section 10905 and further amended by section 1406 of Health Care and
Note: NPRM was published
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-152).
on 03/04/2013 (78 F.R.
14034).
TREAS/IRS
Shared Responsibility for
Proposed regulations under section 4980H of the Internal Revenue Code, as enacted by the
12/2013
Employers Regarding
Affordable Care Act, to provide guidance relating to the offering of health coverage by
Health Coverage (1545-
applicable large employers to their ful -time employees.
Note: NPRM was published
BL33)
on 01/02/2013 (78 F.R. 218).
The final rule had not been
published as of 12/02/2013.
ATBCB
Accessibility Standards for
This regulation will establish minimum technical criteria to ensure that medical equipment used 03/2014
Medical Diagnostic
for diagnostic purposes by health professionals in (or in conjunction with) physician’s offices,
Equipment (3014-AA40)
clinics, emergency rooms, hospitals, and other medical settings is accessible to and usable by
Note: NPRM was published
individuals with disabilities.
on 02/09/2012 (77 F.R.
6916), advisory committee
was later established (see 77
F.R. 39656). Legal deadline
for final rule was
03/22/2012.
OPM
Federal Employees Health
The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) plans to publish a final rule to amend the
Final rule was published on
Benefits Program and
Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) regulations at 5 CFR part 890 to include changes
10/30/2013 (78 F.R. 64873).
Federal Employees Dental
pertaining to the Affordable Care Act in regard to age 26 and children of same-sex partners.
and Vision Insurance
Note: NPRM was published
Program: Coverage of
on 07/20/2012 (77 F.R.
Children Federal Flexible
42914).
Benefits Plan: Pre-Tax
Payment of Health Benefits
Premiums (3206-AM55)
SSA
Conforming Changes to
We [SSA] are modifying our regulations to the Medicare Part B income-related monthly
Interim final rule published
Regulations Regarding
adjustment amount (IRMAA) in order to conform to changes made to the Social Security Act
on 09/18/2013 (78 F.R.
Income-Related Monthly
(Act) by the Affordable Care Act. These rules remove the requirement that beneficiaries
57257).
Adjustment Amounts to
consent to the release of IRS information outside of SSA for appeals past the reconsideration
Medicare Part B Premiums
level and freeze the income threshold and ranges from 2011 through 2019. We are also

(3734I) (0960-AH47)
removing provisions that phased in the income-related monthly adjustment amount between
2007 and 2009. The regulation also updates an outdated provision to reflect the transfer of
authority for hearing appeals under title XVIII of the Act from SSA to the Department of
Health and Human Services, as prescribed by the Medicare Prescription Drug, and
Modernization Act of 2003.
CRS-23

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act: Fall 2011 Unified Agenda

Department/
Expected
Agency
Title of Rule (RIN)
Abstract, as Provided in the Unified Agenda
Publication Date
HHS/CMS,
Certain Preventive Services This final rule amends to regulations regarding certain preventive health services under
Final rule published on
DOL/EBSA,
Under the Affordable Care
provisions of the Affordable Care Act. The amendments establish alternative ways to fulfill the
07/02/2013 (78 F.R. 39870).
TREAS/IRS,
Act (CMS-9968-F) (0938-
requirements of the Public Health Service Act and corresponding provisions under the
jointly
AR42), (1210-AB44),
Employee Retirement Income Security Act and the Internal Revenue Code.
Note: Several earlier
(1545-BJ60)
versions of this rule were
published; see 78 F.R. 8456,
77 F.R. 16501, 77 F.R. 8725,
76 F.R. 46621, and 7.5. FR
41726.
HHS/CMS,
Ninety-Day Waiting Period This final rule implements the 90-day waiting period limitation under section 2708 of the Public 12/2013
DOL/EBSA,
Limitation and Technical
Health Service Act, as added by the Affordable Care Act, as amended, and incorporated into
TREAS/IRS,
Amendments to Certain
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code. It also
Note: NPRM was published
jointly
Health Coverage
amends regulations to conform to Affordable Care Act provisions already in effect as well as
on 03/21/2013 (78 F.R.
Requirements Under the
those that will become effective beginning 2014.
17313). Legal deadline for
Affordable Care Act (CMS-
final rule is 01/01/2014. The
9952-F) (0938-AR77),
final rule had not been
(1210-AB56), (1545-BL50)
published as of 12/02/2013.
Source: Information in the first three columns is verbatim as reported in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, July 3, 2013, available at
http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain. Information in the fourth column is from the Unified Agenda and the Federal Register.
Note: The table includes only those Unified Agenda entries in which the Affordable Care Act was mentioned.




CRS-24

---

Upcoming Rules Pursuant to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Author Contact Information

Maeve P. Carey
Michelle D. Christensen
Analyst in Government Organization and
Analyst in Government Organization and
Management
Management
mcarey@crs.loc.gov, 7-7775
mchristensen@crs.loc.gov, 7-0764


Congressional Research Service
26

---