The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program: Categorical Eligibility
Gene Falk
Specialist in Social Policy
Randy Alison Aussenberg
Analyst in Nutrition Assistance Policy
September 17, 2013
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R42054
CRS Report for Congress
Pr
epared for Members and Committees of Congress

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Summary
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides benefits to low-income,
eligible households on an electronic benefit transfer (EBT) card; benefits can then be exchanged
for foods at authorized retailers. SNAP reaches a large share of low-income households. In June
2013, there were 47.7 million persons in 23.1 million households benefitting from SNAP.
Federal SNAP law provides two basic pathways for financial eligibility to the program: (1)
meeting program-specific federal eligibility requirements; or (2) being automatically or
“categorically” eligible for SNAP based on being eligible for or receiving benefits from other
specified low-income assistance programs. Categorical eligibility eliminated the requirement that
households who already met financial eligibility rules in one specified low-income program go
through another financial eligibility determination in SNAP.
In its traditional form, categorical eligibility conveys SNAP eligibility based on household receipt
of cash assistance from Supplemental Security Income (SSI), the Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families (TANF) block grant, or state-run General Assistance (GA) programs. However,
since the 1996 welfare reform law, states have been able to expand categorical eligibility beyond
its traditional bounds. That law created TANF to replace the Aid to Families with Dependent
Children (AFDC) program, which was a traditional cash assistance program. TANF is a broad-
purpose block grant that finances a wide range of social and human services. TANF gives states
flexibility in meeting its goals, resulting in a wide variation of benefits and services offered
among the states. SNAP allows states to convey categorical eligibility based on receipt of a TANF
“benefit,” not just TANF cash welfare. This provides states with the ability to convey categorical
eligibility based on a wide range of benefits and services. TANF benefits other than cash
assistance typically are available to a broader range of households and at higher levels of income
than are TANF cash assistance benefits.
As of October 1, 2012, 43 jurisdictions have implemented what the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) has called “broad-based” categorical eligibility. These jurisdictions generally
make all households with incomes below a state-determined income threshold eligible for SNAP.
States do this by providing households with a low-cost TANF-funded benefit or service such as a
brochure or referral to an “800” number telephone hotline. There are varying income eligibility
thresholds within states that convey “broad-based” categorical eligibility, though no state has a
gross income limit above 200% of the federal poverty guidelines. In all but five of these
jurisdictions, there is no asset test required for SNAP eligibility. Categorically eligible families
bypass the regular SNAP asset limits. However, their net incomes (income after deductions for
expenses) must still be low enough to qualify for a SNAP benefit. That is, it is possible to be
categorically eligible for SNAP but have net income too high to actually receive a benefit. The
exception to this is one- or two-person households that would still receive the minimum benefit.
The omnibus “farm bill” approved by the Senate on June 10, 2013 (S. 954), reauthorizes and
makes certain changes to SNAP, but does not make changes affecting categorical eligibility. On
the other hand, H.R. 3102 (the “Nutrition Reform and Work Opportunity Act of 2013”), which is
pending in the House, would restrict SNAP categorical eligibility to only those households
receiving need-tested cash assistance (the traditional form of categorical eligibility), ending the
state option to have “broad-based” categorical eligibility The Congressional Budget Office (CBO)
estimates that an average of 1.2 million persons per year would lose eligibility because of the
categorical eligibility restrictions in H.R. 3102 over the next 10 years; it would also result in
Congressional Research Service

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

budget savings of $11.4 billion over the 5 years from FY2014 to FY2018, and $19.0 billion over
the 10 years from FY2014 to FY2023.

Congressional Research Service

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Current SNAP Legislation ............................................................................................................... 1
Regular and Categorical Eligibility for SNAP................................................................................. 2
Eligibility through Meeting Federal Income and Resource Tests .............................................. 2
Categorical Eligibility ............................................................................................................... 2
Early History ....................................................................................................................... 3
The 1996 Welfare Law and TANF ...................................................................................... 3
What TANF Means for Categorical Eligibility ................................................................... 4
Traditional, Narrow, and Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility ........................................................ 5
Scope and Reach of Categorical Eligibility ............................................................................... 5
“Broad-Based” Categorical Eligibility Practices ....................................................................... 7
Incomes and Assets of SNAP Households ..................................................................................... 13
Income ..................................................................................................................................... 13
Assets ....................................................................................................................................... 16

Figures
Figure 1. Scope of SNAP Categorical Eligibility by State .............................................................. 7

Tables
Table 1. SNAP Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility by State ......................................................... 9
Table 2. Gross Incomes of SNAP Households Compared with Poverty: FY2011 ........................ 13
Table 3. Estimates of SNAP Households without An Elderly or Disabled Member with
Gross Incomes Over 130% of Poverty by State: FY2011 .......................................................... 14
Table A-1. Federal SNAP Monthly Income Eligibility Limits for FY2013 ................................... 17
Table A-2. Maximum Monthly Earnings a TANF Cash Assistance Applicant Can Receive
and Still Meet Initial Eligibility for Benefits for a Family of Three: July 2010 ......................... 18

Appendixes
Appendix. ....................................................................................................................................... 17

Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 19
Area of Expertise by Author .......................................................................................................... 19

Congressional Research Service

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Introduction
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provided food assistance to 47.7 million
people in 23.1 million households in June 2013. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects
that SNAP spending will peak at $83 billion in FY2013 before falling beginning in FY2014.1
SNAP participation and costs have increased markedly since FY2007, mostly as a result of
automatic and legislated responses to the recession.2
While much of the recent increase is attributable to the poor economy, recently states have been
increasingly adopting more expansive “categorical eligibility” rules—a set of policies that make a
SNAP applicant eligible based on the applicant’s involvement with other low-income assistance
programs: benefits from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) block grant,
Supplemental Security Income (SSI), and state-financed General Assistance (GA) programs. This
report discusses categorical eligibility and some of the issues raised by it. It first describes the
three different types of categorical eligibility: traditional categorical eligibility conveyed through
receipt of need-based cash assistance, and the newer “narrow” and “broad-based” categorical
eligibilities conveyed via TANF “noncash” benefits. It also provides recent information on
current state practices with regard to categorical eligibility. Finally, the report discusses proposals
to restrict categorical eligibility.
Current SNAP Legislation
The omnibus “farm bill” approved by the Senate on June 10, 2013 (S. 954), reauthorizes and
makes certain changes to SNAP, but does not make changes affecting categorical eligibility. On
the other hand, H.R. 3102 (the “Nutrition Reform and Work Opportunity Act of 2013”), which is
pending in the House, would restrict SNAP categorical eligibility to only those households
receiving need-tested cash assistance (the traditional form of categorical eligibility), ending the
state option to have “broad-based” categorical eligibility. This provision is the same as the one
contained in H.R. 1947, which was reported earlier this year from the House Agriculture
Committee but defeated on the House floor.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that an annual average of 1.8 million people
would lose benefits over the next 10 years (2014-2023) if categorical eligibility were restricted to
families receiving only cash assistance from TANF, SSI, or GA as proposed in H.R. 3201.3 CBO
estimates that this restriction to categorical eligibility would reduce federal outlays by a total of
$11.4 over the 5 years from FY2014 to FY2018, and $19.0 billion over the 10 years from FY2014
to FY2023.

1 This figure is according to CBO’s May 2013 baseline.
2 See Congressional Budget Office, The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, April 2012, http://www.cbo.gov/
sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/04-19-SNAP.pdf.
3 See Congressional Budget Office, Letter to the Honorable Frank D. Lucas, Chairman, Committee on Agriculture,
September 16, 2013. http://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/cbofiles/attachments/HR3102.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
1

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Regular and Categorical Eligibility for SNAP
Federal law provides the basic eligibility rules for SNAP. There are two basic pathways to gain
financial eligibility for SNAP: (1) having income and resources below specified levels set out in
federal SNAP law; and (2) being “categorically,” or automatically, eligible based on receiving
benefits from other specified low-income assistance programs.
Eligibility through Meeting Federal Income and Resource Tests
Under the regular federal rules, SNAP provides eligibility to households based on low income
and limited assets. Households must have net income (income after specified deductions) below
100% of the federal poverty guidelines. In addition, federal rules provide that households without
an elderly or disabled4 member must have gross income (income before deductions) below 130%
of the federal poverty guidelines (see Table A-1).
Additionally, the regular eligibility rules provide that a household must have liquid assets below a
specified level. Under federal rules in FY2013, a household’s liquid assets must also be below
$2,000, and below $3,250 in the case of households with an elderly or disabled member. The
value of the home is excluded from this “assets test,” as are certain other forms of assets (e.g.,
retirement and educational savings).
Further, a portion of the value of a household’s vehicles is not counted toward the asset limit (up
to $4,650 of the fair market value of a household’s vehicles). However, federal law gives states
the option to further exclude the value of vehicles from being counted toward the asset limit.
States may elect to use the exclusion applicable for TANF assistance in their SNAP program.
Under TANF, many states fully exclude the value of one vehicle. This option is distinct from
categorical eligibility.
Categorical Eligibility
Federal law also makes households in which all members are either eligible for or receive
benefits from TANF, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), or state-financed GA programs
categorically, or automatically, eligible for SNAP.5 These households, who have already gone
through eligibility determination for those programs, bypass the income and resource tests
discussed above and are deemed financially eligible.6 They then have their SNAP benefits
determined.
Categorically eligible households have their SNAP benefits determined under the same rules as
other households. A household’s SNAP benefit amount is based on the maximum benefit (which

4 “Elderly or disabled” is defined in Section 3(j) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008.
5 Section 5(a) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008.
6 Additionally, federal law also provides a separate rule for households where some, but not all, members receive
benefits from TANF or SSI. In such households, recipients of TANF or SSI benefits are deemed to have passed the
SNAP resource test. That is, the assets of household members who receive TANF, SSI, or GA are disregarded from the
household’s total resources when determining whether the household passes the asset test (Section 5(j) of the Food and
Nutrition Act of 2008).
Congressional Research Service
2

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

varies by household size) and its net countable income after deductions for certain expenses.
While the household may be categorically eligible, its net income may be too high to actually
receive a SNAP benefit. The exception is that all eligible households consisting of one or two
persons are eligible for at least the minimum monthly benefit, set at $16 in the 48 contiguous
states and the District of Columbia in FY2013.
Early History
Special rules providing for expedited eligibility of cash assistance recipients date back to
amendments to the Food Stamp program enacted in 1971.7 These rules were eliminated in the
rewrite of food stamp law enacted in 1977, but they were reinstated in phases during the early
1980s through 1990.8 Categorical eligibility was seen as advancing the goals of simplifying
administration, easing entry to the program for eligible households, emphasizing coordination
among low-income assistance programs, and reducing the potential for errors in establishing
eligibility for benefits.9 The Food Security Act of 1985 conveyed categorical eligibility to all
households receiving cash aid from Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), SSI, or
state-run GA programs. These programs had their own income and resource tests (often more
stringent than food stamp tests), so subjecting a household to a separate set of income and
resource tests for food stamps could be seen as redundant and inefficient.
The 1996 Welfare Law and TANF
The current form of categorical eligibility resulted from the 1996 welfare reform law (the
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, P.L. 104-193). That
law ended AFDC, replacing it with TANF. AFDC was a traditional cash assistance program.
Within some federal rules, states set AFDC eligibility and benefit amounts, but federal law
established it as a cash welfare program. AFDC eligibility rules were generally more restrictive
than those for food stamps, and most AFDC families also received a substantial food stamp
benefit.
TANF, on the other hand, is a broad-purpose block grant that gives states broad flexibility to
expend funds. The statutory purpose of TANF is to increase state flexibility to achieve four policy
goals:10
1. provide assistance to needy families so that children can be cared for in their own
homes or in the homes of their relatives;

7 Section 6 of P.L. 91-671.
8 The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1982 (P.L. 97-253) provided that a household in which all members
received Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) cash assistance bypass the Food Stamp asset test (but not
the income eligibility test). The Food Security Act of 1985 (P.L. 99-198) provided that households in which all
members received AFDC or SSI would be automatically eligible for Food Stamps, bypassing both the income and asset
tests. P.L. 99-198 made this a temporary provision that would sunset at the end of FY1998. P.L. 100-435 eliminated the
sunset, making categorical eligibility a permanent feature of Food Stamp law. Categorical eligibility was extended to
recipients of state-run GA programs in 1990, enacted as part of P.L. 101-624.
9 U.S. Congress, House Committee on Agriculture, report to accompany H.R. 2100, 99th Cong., 1st sess., September 13,
1985, H.Rept 99-271, Part 1 (Washington: GPO, 1985), p. 142.
10 Section 401(a) of the Social Security Act.
Congressional Research Service
3

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

2. end dependence by needy parents on government benefits through promoting
work, job preparation, and marriage;
3. reduce the incidence of out-of-wedlock pregnancies; and
4. promote the formation and maintenance of two-parent families.
States may expend TANF funds and associated state funds (called Maintenance of Effort or MOE
funds) in any manner “reasonably calculated”11 to achieve the TANF purpose, providing broad
authority for the types of activities that may be funded. These activities include the traditional
cash assistance programs—which convey traditional categorical eligibility.12 However, in FY2011
traditional cash welfare accounted for only 29% of all expenditures from the TANF block grant
and MOE funds.
TANF funds a wide range of other benefits and services that seek to ameliorate the effects, or
address the root causes, of child poverty. TANF benefits and services to achieve the first two
goals of TANF (provide assistance, end dependence of needy parents on government benefits)
must be for needy families with children. These benefits or services are need-tested, though states
determine their own income thresholds. These benefits are often available to families at higher
levels of income than is cash assistance, often a multiple of the federal poverty threshold, and
without an asset test.
Moreover, TANF services directed at the third and fourth goals shown above can be for any
person in a state; that is, TANF services to reduce out-of-wedlock pregnancies or promote two-
parent families are not restricted to families with children. These benefits and services are
potentially available to a state’s entire population. Federal rules also do not require that they be
need-tested benefits and services.
What TANF Means for Categorical Eligibility
The 1996 welfare reform law did not substantively change SNAP law with respect to categorical
eligibility. Rather, it simply replaced the reference to AFDC with one to TANF in the section of
law that conveys categorical eligibility. As discussed above, TANF gives states much broader
authority than they had under AFDC to offer different types of benefits and services. This
expansion of authority under TANF had major implications for categorical eligibility, allowing
states to convey categorical eligibility based on receipt of a wide range of human services rather
than simply cash welfare.
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulations issued in 2000 provide rules for which
noncash or in-kind TANF or MOE-funded benefits or services can be used to convey SNAP
categorical eligibility.13 The regulations require that states make categorically eligible for SNAP

11 Section 404(a)(1) of the Social Security Act.
12 In regulations promulgated after the 1996 welfare law, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) divided
TANF- and MOE-funded activities into two categories: (1) assistance, and (2) everything else. The regulations defined
assistance generally as representing the traditional cash assistance programs (“basic assistance”) and transportation or
child care aid for nonworking persons.
13 The regulations are at 7 C.F.R. 273.2(j). See discussion of the final rule at U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and
Nutrition Service, “Food Stamp Program: Noncitizen Eligibility, and Certification Provisions of P.L. 104-193, as
Amended by Public Laws 104-208, 105-33, and 105-185,” 65 Federal Register 70159-70161, November 21, 2000.
Congressional Research Service
4

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

• households in which all members receive or are authorized to receive14 cash
assistance funded by TANF or MOE dollars; and
• households in which all members receive or are authorized to receive noncash
aid funded at least 50% by TANF or MOE dollars.
The regulations imposed one restriction on states in conveying categorical eligibility: if the
TANF- or MOE-funded benefit or service was aimed at achieving TANF goals three (reducing
out-of-wedlock pregnancies) or four (promoting two-parent families), the state would have to
choose a program with an income limit of no more than 200% of the federal poverty guideline for
conveying categorical eligibility.
Additionally, subject to the 200% of poverty restriction discussed above, the regulations give
states the option of making categorically eligible for SNAP
• households in which all members receive or are authorized to receive noncash
assistance funded less than 50% by TANF or MOE dollars; and
• households in which at least one member receives or is authorized to receive
noncash aid funded at least partially by TANF or MOE dollars, but the state
agency determines the whole household benefits from such noncash aid.
Traditional, Narrow, and Broad-Based
Categorical Eligibility
As discussed, in instances of categorical eligibility, SNAP applicants can be found eligible for
SNAP based on their receipt of benefit from other specified means-tested programs.15 At
minimum, households that receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) cash
assistance, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), or state-funded general assistance cash benefits
must be found categorically eligible for SNAP. However, the 1996 welfare reform law’s creation
of TANF as a broad-based block grant has allowed for a state option to include a long list of
benefits/services that can convey SNAP eligibility. This section discusses state choices in this
area as of October 2012.
Scope and Reach of Categorical Eligibility
The current status of SNAP categorical eligibility is the product of state choices. At minimum, a
state must implement “traditional” categorical eligibility, but some states allow additional
programs and benefits to convey categorical eligibility. The USDA has developed a typology of
state practices on categorical eligibility, categorizing states into three groups:
• Traditional categorical eligibility only. In its traditional form, a household
where all members receive need-tested cash aid from SSI, GA, or TANF is

14 The regulations also provide that a family is categorically eligible if they either receive a TANF- or MOE-funded
benefit or if they are “authorized” to receive such a benefit. “Authorized” to receive a benefit means that they have
been determined eligible and have been informed as such; they do not need to actually be receiving benefits.
15 See 7 U.S.C. 2014(a).
Congressional Research Service
5

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

automatically made eligible for SNAP as well. These households have already
met the income and (in general) resource test for cash aid. Note that states set
income and asset eligibility rules for TANF and GA (see Table A-2 for maximum
earnings possible for entry to TANF cash assistance in July 2010). SSI provides a
federal income floor based on federal rules for the needy who are aged, blind, or
disabled. However, states may supplement SSI with their own funds, leading to
state variation in SSI eligibility as well. Based on the most current information
available, only five states currently convey only traditional categorical eligibility.
• “Narrow” categorical eligibility. These states have expanded categorical
eligibility beyond just traditional categorical eligibility, but in a way to limit the
number of households made eligible for SNAP. These states convey categorical
eligibility through receipt of cash and certain TANF noncash benefits, such as
child care and counseling. Based on the most current information available, only
five states have “narrow” categorical eligibility policies.
• “Broad-based” categorical eligibility. These states have expanded categorical
eligibility in ways that make most, if not all, households with low incomes in a
state categorically eligible for SNAP. States could make all low-income
households in a state—including those without children—eligible for a TANF-
funded service directed at either the reducing out-of-wedlock pregnancies or
promoting two-parent families goals of TANF. If a state opted to do so, any low-
income household (under 200% of poverty, per regulation) could either receive,
or be authorized to receive, such a TANF-funded service. Based on the currently
available information, 40 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin
Islands have broad-based categorical eligibility policies.
Figure 1 displays a map categorizing states and territories by these three categories.
Congressional Research Service
6

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Figure 1. Scope of SNAP Categorical Eligibility by State

Source: Congressional Research Service (CRS), based on data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
October 2012.
“Broad-Based” Categorical Eligibility Practices
Broad-based categorical eligibility is a policy that makes most households with incomes below a
certain threshold categorically eligible for SNAP. Typically, households are made categorically
eligible through receiving or being authorized to receive a minimal TANF- or MOE-funded
benefit or service, such as being given a brochure or being referred to a social services “800”
telephone number (see Table 1). Recalling the USDA regulation, the brochure or telephone
number must be funded with TANF or MOE dollars and thus must be directed at a TANF
purpose.16
States have increasingly availed themselves of the option to use broad-based categorical
eligibility to expand and ease access to SNAP eligibility. The Department of Agriculture reports
that as of October 2012 (the latest data available), 43 jurisdictions operated broad-based
categorical eligibility to make most or all households in their state with whom the state welfare
office comes in contact SNAP eligible.

16 For a discussion of state practices regarding “broad-based” categorical eligibility, see U.S. Government
Accountability Office, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Improved Oversight of State Eligibility Expansions
Needed, GAO-12-670, July 2012.
Congressional Research Service
7

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Table 1 shows the use of SNAP broad-based categorical eligibility by state as of October 2012.
Of the 43 jurisdictions using broad-based categorical eligibility,
• 41 make all family types eligible (New Hampshire restricted broad-based
categorical eligibility to families with children; New York restricted broad-based
categorical eligibility to households with dependent care expenses);
• 38 currently have no asset test (Texas, Michigan, Nebraska, Idaho, and
Pennsylvania apply an asset test for all households. Note, though, currently in 11
jurisdictions, households with an elderly and disabled member with incomes in
excess of 200% of the federal poverty guidelines have to meet the regular SNAP
asset tests of $3,250 for households of that type); and
• 27 have a gross income limit above 130% of the federal poverty guidelines,
though some of the largest states (California; New York, for families without
dependent care expenses; and Illinois) retained the 130% gross income limit.
According to USDA policy and guidance, there is a general way that a state would administer
broad-based categorical eligibility for a SNAP applicant. The local SNAP office would collect
basic income information on the applicant; if the applicant’s income is below the limit specified,
then the state office would administer, or determine whether a member of the household was
authorized to receive, a relatively nominal TANF-funded benefit or service. Receipt of this TANF
benefit or service then constitutes SNAP eligibility through broad-based categorical eligibility.
(As discussed above, it is still possible to be categorically eligible but receive no benefit because
net income is too high.)
In the case of the District of Columbia, as shown in the table, if the applicant’s gross income is
below 200% of poverty, the applicant would then receive a particular brochure for a program that
is TANF-funded and would then be eligible for SNAP through the broad-based categorical
eligibility pathway.
Congressional Research Service
8

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Table 1. SNAP Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility by State
Information as of November 2012, Excludes States without Broad-Based Categorical Eligibility
Gross Income
Limit for
Households
Without an
Elderly or
Disabled Member
(% of federal
Households
Type of TANF
poverty
State
Eligible
Benefit or Servicea Asset
Rules guidelines)b
Alabama All

Brochure
No
limit.
130%
Households with an
elderly or disabled
member with
incomes over 200%
of poverty face a
$3,250 asset limit.
Arizona
Al
Referral on application
No limit
185%
California Al
Pamphlet
No
limit
130%
Colorado
Al
Notice on application
No limit.
130%
Households with an
elderly or disabled
member with
incomes over 200%
of poverty face a
$3,250 asset limit.
Connecticut
All
“Help for People in
No limit
185%
Need” brochure
Delaware
Al
Application refers to a
No limit
200%
pregnancy prevention
hotline
District of
All Brochure
No
limit 200%
Columbia
Florida Al
Notice
No
limit

130%
Georgia All
TANF
Community
No limit.
130%
Outreach Services
Households with an
brochure
elderly or disabled
member with
incomes over 200%
of poverty face a
$3,250 asset limit.
Hawaii Al
Brochure
No
limit
200%
Idaho
All
Flyer about referral
$5,000 130%
service
Illinois
Al
Guide to services
No limit.
130%
Households with an
elderly or disabled
member with
incomes over 200%
of poverty face a
$3,250 asset limit.
Congressional Research Service
9

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Gross Income
Limit for
Households
Without an
Elderly or
Disabled Member
(% of federal
Households
Type of TANF
poverty
State
Eligible
Benefit or Servicea Asset
Rules guidelines)b
Iowa
Al
Notice of eligibility
No limit
160%
Kentucky
Al
Resource guide
No limit.
130%
Households with an
elderly or disabled
member with
incomes over 200%
of poverty face a
$3,250 asset limit.
Louisiana
All
Information handout
No limit
130%
Maine
Al
Resource guide
No limit
185%
Maryland
All
Referral to services on
No limit
200%
application
Massachusetts Al
Brochure
No
limit.
200%. Households
Households with an
without children
elderly or disabled
(aged 18 or
member with
younger) or an
incomes over 200%
elderly or disabled
of poverty face a
member have a
$3,250 asset limit.
gross income limit
of 130%.
Michigan
Al
Notice on application
$5,000. First vehicle
200%
is excluded; other
vehicles with fair
market value over
$15,000 are
counted.
Minnesota All
Domestic
violence No limit
165%
brochure
Mississippi
All
Language on notice
No limit
130%
Montana All
Brochure
No
limit
200%
Nebraska
All
Pamphlet
$25,000 for liquid
130%
assets
Nevada All
Pregnancy
prevention
No limit
200%
information on
application
New Hampshire
Households with at
Brochure No
limit
185%
least one dependent
child
New Jersey
All
Brochure
No limit
185%
New Mexico
All
Brochure
No limit
165%
Congressional Research Service
10

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Gross Income
Limit for
Households
Without an
Elderly or
Disabled Member
(% of federal
Households
Type of TANF
poverty
State
Eligible
Benefit or Servicea Asset
Rules guidelines)b
New York
Households with
Brochure mailed yearly
No limit.
200%
dependent care
Households with an
expenses
elderly or disabled
member with
incomes over 200%
of poverty face a
$3,250 asset limit.
North Carolina
Al
Not specified
No limit
200%
North Dakota
All
Statement on
No limit
200%
application/recertification
forms and pamphlet
Ohio
All
Ohio Benefit Bank
No limit.
130%
information on approval
Households with an
notice
elderly or disabled
member with
incomes over 200%
of poverty face a
$3,250 asset limit.
Oklahoma
Al
Certification notice has
No limit
130%
website and 800 number
about marriage classes
Oregon All
Pamphlet
No
limit
185%
Pennsylvania All
Pamphlet
$5,500.
Households 160%
with an elderly or
disabled member
with incomes over
200% of poverty
face a $9,500 asset
limit.
Rhode Island
Al
Publication
No limit.
185%
Households with an
elderly or disabled
member with
incomes over 200%
of poverty face a
$3,250 asset limit.
South Carolina
Al
Pamphlet
No limit.
130%
Households with an
elderly or disabled
member with
incomes over 200%
of poverty face a
$3,250 asset limit.
Congressional Research Service
11

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Gross Income
Limit for
Households
Without an
Elderly or
Disabled Member
(% of federal
Households
Type of TANF
poverty
State
Eligible
Benefit or Servicea Asset
Rules guidelines)b
Texas All
Information
about
$5,000 (excludes
165%
various services provided one vehicle and
on the application
includes excess
vehicle value).
Vermont All
Bookmark
with No limit
185%
telephone number and
website for services
Washington All
Information
and
referral
No limit
200%
services provided on
approval letter.
West Virginia
Al
Information and referral
No limit
130%
services program
brochure
Wisconsin
All
Job Net services
No limit
200%
language on approval and
change notices
Guam All
Brochure
No
limit
165%
Virgin Islands
Al
Brochure
No limit.
130%
Households with an
elderly or disabled
member with
incomes over 200%
of poverty face a
$3,250 asset limit.
Source: Prepared by the Congressional Research Service based on data from U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS).
a. Type of TANF benefit or service is information collected by the USDA, and this column utilizes USDA’s
terms. References to a notice or notice on application generally refers to an agency communication that an
applicant may be eligible for TANF or related benefit.
b. Households with an elderly or disabled member do not have a gross income limit in SNAP.

Congressional Research Service
12

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Incomes and Assets of SNAP Households
Income
Because broad-based categorical eligibility conveys SNAP to households with gross incomes as
high as 200% of poverty, there is concern that it could be unduly expanding the program.
However, broad-based categorical eligibility has not resulted in large numbers of households
receiving SNAP who have gross incomes, as measured using SNAP income counting rules,
exceeding 130% of poverty.17 Table 2 shows that in FY2011, a monthly average of 3.5% of all
households without an elderly or disabled member had incomes above 130% of poverty. (As
mentioned above, households with an elderly or disabled member are not subject to the 130% of
poverty gross income limit under regular federal eligibility rules.)
Table 2. Gross Incomes of SNAP Households Compared with Poverty: FY2011
By Household Type
Households without an
Households with an
Elderly or Disabled
Elderly or Disabled
All SNAP

Member
Member
Households
Below poverty
85.8%
77.7%
82.9%
100% to 130% of
10.7 15.4 12.4
poverty
131% of poverty and
3.5 6.9 4.8
higher
Total 100.0
100.0
100.0
Source: Congressional Research Service (CRS) tabulations of the FY2011 SNAP Quality Control Data File.
Notes: Detail may not add to totals because of rounding. The information on the Quality Control Data File
sometimes fails to categorize a household with a disabled member. Therefore, some households classified in this
table as “without an elderly or disabled member” may in fact contain a disabled person.
Table 3 shows both the number and percent of households without an elderly or disabled member
that have incomes above 130% of poverty by state.18

17 This is based on data from the SNAP Quality Control Data files. These are administrative data, and the files include
monthly income data collected in determining SNAP eligibility and benefits. The data and the resulting analysis differ
in a number of ways from that of Census Bureau household survey income data of SNAP households. SNAP monthly
income data represents gross income as defined in SNAP law; this might exclude some income reported by households
in the Census survey. Moreover, SNAP eligibility and benefits are based on monthly income. The most widely reported
income data from Census household surveys examines annual income. Households may use the SNAP program in
particular months of economic need, which annual income data would not capture. There are also differences between
the SNAP and Census Bureau concepts of household and poverty thresholds.
18 Some states that have gross income limits of 130% of poverty report a small number of households without an
elderly or disabled member as having incomes above 130% of poverty. This is likely because of limitation on the
Quality Control Data File in identifying disabled individuals. The information on the Quality Control Data File
sometimes fails to categorize a household with a disabled member. Therefore, some households classified in this table
as “without an elderly or disabled member” may in fact contain a disabled person.

Congressional Research Service
13

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Table 3. Estimates of SNAP Households without An Elderly or Disabled Member
with Gross Incomes Over 130% of Poverty by State: FY2011
Percent of All
Households
Number of
without An
Households
Elderly or
without an Elderly
Disabled
or Disabled
Member and
Member and Gross
with Gross
Income Over 130%
Incomes Over
State
of Poverty
130% of Poverty
Alabama 0
0.0%
Alaska 59
0.2
Arizona 18,054
5.4
Arkansas 0
0.0
California 2,949
0.2
Colorado 228
0.2
Connecticut 8,537
7.5
Delaware 3,945
9.4
District of Columbia
1,853
3.7
Florida 38,872
3.7
Georgia 0
0.0
Hawai 1,077
2.3
Idaho 0
0.0
Illinois 1,353
0.2
Indiana 0
0.0
Iowa 3,985
3.4
Kansas 99
0.1
Kentucky 551
0.3
Louisiana 976
0.4
Maine 8,574
12.2
Maryland 20,525
9.9
Massachusetts 19,468
9.2
Michigan 54,279
9.2
Minnesota 6,150
4.2
Mississippi 0
0.0
Congressional Research Service
14

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Percent of All
Households
Number of
without An
Households
Elderly or
without an Elderly
Disabled
or Disabled
Member and
Member and Gross
with Gross
Income Over 130%
Incomes Over
State
of Poverty
130% of Poverty
Guam 570
5.4
Virgin Islands
0
0.0
Total 468,742
3.5
Source: Congressional Research Service (CRS) tabulation of the FY2011 SNAP Quality Control data file.
Note: Some states that have gross income limits of 130% of poverty report a smal number of households
without an elderly or disabled member as having incomes above 130% of poverty. This is likely because of
limitation on the Quality Control Data File in identifying disabled individuals. The information on the Quality
Control Data File sometimes fails to categorize a household with a disabled member. Therefore, some
households classified in this table as “without an elderly or disabled member” may in fact contain a disabled
person.

Assets
As discussed above, broad-based categorical eligibility also eliminates the SNAP asset test in
many states. Since states that do not administer an asset test generally do not collect data on the
assets of SNAP households, it is not possible to determine the extent to which broad-based
categorical eligibility has resulted in households with assets above the usual SNAP limit
receiving benefits.

Congressional Research Service
16

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Appendix.
Table A-1. Federal SNAP Monthly Income Eligibility Limits for FY2013
Household Size
48 States
Alaska
Hawaii
Gross Monthly Income Limits (130% of the federal poverty guidelines)
1
$1,211
$1,514
$1,394
2
1,640
1,577
1,887
3
2,069
2,586
2,379
4
2,498
3,123
2,872
5
2,927
3,659
3,365
6
3,356
4,195
3,858
7
3,785
4,731
4,351
8
4,214
5,268
4,844
Each Additional Member
429
537
493

Net Monthly Income Limits (100% of the federal poverty guidelines)
1
931
1,165
$1,072
2 1,261
1,577

1,451
3
1,591
1,990
1,830
4
1,921
2,402
2,210
5
2,251
2,815
2,589
6
2,581
3,227
2,968
7
2,911
3,640
3,347
8
3,241
4,052
3,726
Each Additional Member
330
413
380
Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (FNS).
Congressional Research Service
17

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Table A-2. Maximum Monthly Earnings a TANF Cash Assistance Applicant Can
Receive and Still Meet Initial Eligibility for Benefits for a Family of Three: July 2010
Maximum Monthly Earnings an
Applicant can Receive and Still
As a Percent of the Federal
State
Be Eligible for Assistance
Poverty Guidelines for 2010
Alabama $269
17.6%
Alaska $1,554
101.8
Arizona $585
38.3
Arkansas $279
18.3
California $1,203
78.8
Colorado $511
33.5
Connecticut $858
56.2
Delaware $428
28.1
D.C. $588
38.5
Florida $393
25.8
Georgia $514
33.7
Hawai $1,740
114.0
Idaho $648
42.5
Illinois $763
50.0
Indiana $378
24.8
Iowa $1,061
69.5
Kansas $519
34.0
Kentucky $908
59.5
Louisiana $360
23.6
Maine $1,023
67.0
Maryland $718
47.1
Massachusetts 703
46.1
Michigan $815
53.4
Minnesota $1,224
80.2
Mississippi $458
30.0
Missouri $557
36.5
Montana $811
53.2
Nebraska $886
58.1
Nevada $1,430
93.7
New Hampshire
$844
55.3
New Jersey
$636
41.7
New Mexico
$1,017
66.7
New York
$843
55.2
North Carolina
$681
44.6
Congressional Research Service
18

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility

Maximum Monthly Earnings an
Applicant can Receive and Still
As a Percent of the Federal
State
Be Eligible for Assistance
Poverty Guidelines for 2010
North Dakota
$1,306
85.6
Ohio $763
50.0
Oklahoma $824
54.0
Oregon $616
40.4
Pennsylvania $493
32.3
Rhode Island
$1,277
83.7
South Carolina
$1,411
92.5
South Dakota
$782
51.3
Tennessee $1,315
86.2
Texas $401
26.3
Utah $668
43.8
Vermont $1,053
69.0
Virginia 539
35.3
Washington $1,122
73.5
West Virginia
$565
37.0
Wisconsina NA
NA
Wyoming $760
49.8
Source: Urban Institute’s Welfare Rules Database.
a. In Wisconsin, families with earnings are ineligible for cash assistance.

Author Contact Information

Gene Falk
Randy Alison Aussenberg
Specialist in Social Policy
Analyst in Nutrition Assistance Policy
gfalk@crs.loc.gov, 7-7344
raussenberg@crs.loc.gov, 7-8641

Area of Expertise by Author
Area of Expertise
Name
Phone
E-mail
TANF
Gene Falk
7-7344
gfalk@crs.loc.gov
SNAP
Randy Alison Aussenberg
7-8641
raussenberg@crs.loc.gov

Congressional Research Service
19