The Global Climate Change Initiative (GCCI):
Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

Richard K. Lattanzio
Analyst in Environmental Policy
September 12, 2013
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R41845


The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

Summary
The United States supports international financial assistance for global climate change initiatives
in developing countries. Under the Obama Administration, this assistance has been articulated
primarily as the Global Climate Change Initiative (GCCI), a platform within the President’s 2010
Policy Directive on Global Development. The GCCI aims to integrate climate change
considerations into U.S. foreign assistance through a range of bilateral, multilateral, and private
sector mechanisms to promote sustainable and climate-resilient societies, foster low-carbon
growth, and reduce emissions from deforestation and land degradation. The GCCI is implemented
through programs at three “core” agencies: the Department of State, the Department of the
Treasury, and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Most GCCI activities at
USAID are implemented through the agency’s bilateral development assistance programs. Many
of the GCCI activities at the Department of State and the Department of the Treasury are
implemented through international organizations, including the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change’s Least Developed Country Fund and Special Climate Change
Fund, as well as multilateral financial institutions such as the Global Environment Facility, the
Clean Technology Fund, and the Strategic Climate Fund. The GCCI is funded through the
Administration’s Executive Budget, Function 150 account, for State, Foreign Operations, and
Related Programs.
Congress is responsible for several activities in regard to the GCCI, including (1) authorizing
periodic appropriations for federal agency programs and multilateral fund contributions, (2)
enacting those appropriations, (3) providing guidance to the agencies, and (4) overseeing U.S.
interests in the programs and the multilateral funds. Recent budget authority for the GCCI was
$945 million in FY2010, $819 million in FY2011, $858 million in FY2012, and $757 million in
FY2013, and has been enacted through legislation including the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2010 (H.R. 3288; P.L. 111-117); the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2010 (H.R. 4899; P.L.
111-212); the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (H.R.
1473; P.L. 112-10); the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (H.R. 2055; P.L. 112-74); and the
Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (H.R. 933; P.L. 113-6). The
Administration’s FY2014 GCCI budget request is $837 million. Congressional committees of
jurisdiction for the GCCI include the U.S. House of Representatives Committees on Foreign
Affairs (various subcommittees); Financial Services, Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and
Trade; and Appropriations, Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs;
and the U.S. Senate Committees on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on International
Development and Foreign Assistance, Economic Affairs, and International Environmental
Protection; and Appropriations, Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related
Programs.
As Congress considers potential authorizations and/or appropriations for activities administered
through the GCCI, it may have questions concerning U.S. agency initiatives and current bilateral
and multilateral programs that address global climate change. Some potential concerns may
include cost, purpose, direction, efficiency, and effectiveness, as well as the GCCI’s relationship
to industry, investment, humanitarian efforts, national security, and international leadership. This
report serves as a brief overview of the GCCI and its structure, intents, and funding history.

Congressional Research Service

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

Contents
The Global Climate Change Initiative ............................................................................................. 1
Adaptation ................................................................................................................................. 1
Clean Energy ............................................................................................................................. 1
Sustainable Landscapes ............................................................................................................. 2
Budget Authority ............................................................................................................................. 2
FY2010 Budget Authority ......................................................................................................... 4
FY2011 Budget Authority ......................................................................................................... 4
FY2012 Budget Authority ......................................................................................................... 5
FY2013 Budget Authority ......................................................................................................... 6
FY2014 Budget Request ............................................................................................................ 7
Key Issues for Congress .................................................................................................................. 7

Tables
Table A-1. Global Climate Change Initiative, Core Agencies Budget Authority, FY2010-
FY2014, by Category ................................................................................................................. 10
Table A-2. Global Climate Change Initiative,
Core Agencies Budget Authority, FY2010-FY2014, by Program .............................................. 11

Appendixes
Appendix. GCCI Budget Tables .................................................................................................... 10

Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 14

Congressional Research Service

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

The Global Climate Change Initiative
On September 22, 2010, President Obama signed the Presidential Policy Directive on Global
Development.1 The directive called for the elevation of foreign development assistance as a
national priority and outlined an integrated approach to development, diplomacy, and national
security. The Global Climate Change Initiative (GCCI)—one of the three main pillars to the 2010
directive2—aims to integrate climate change considerations into relevant foreign assistance
through a range of bilateral, multilateral, and private mechanisms to promote sustainable and
resilient societies, foster low-carbon growth, and reduce emissions from deforestation and land
degradation. The GCCI is divided into three main programmatic initiatives, or categories: (1)
adaptation assistance, (2) clean energy assistance, and (3) sustainable landscapes assistance.
Adaptation
Adaptation programs aim to assist low-income countries with reducing their vulnerability to
climate change impacts and building climate resilience. Bilateral and regional programs at the
Department of State and USAID target the more vulnerable countries in Africa, Asia, and Latin
America and strive to address climate risks in areas including infrastructure, agriculture, health,
and water services; to develop capacity for countries to use the best science and analysis for
decision making; and to promote sound governance to carry out these decisions. Multilateral
initiatives supported by the United States include the Least Developed Country Fund3 and the
Special Climate Change Fund,4 which focus on climate resilience and food security provisions in
countries with the greatest needs; and the Pilot Program for Climate Resilience,5 which is tasked
with coordinating comprehensive strategies in several of the most vulnerable countries to support
actions that respond to the potential risks of a changing climate.
Clean Energy
Clean energy programs aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from energy generation and
energy use by accelerating the deployment of clean energy technologies, policies, and practices.
The United States delivers much of its assistance for clean energy deployment through
multilateral trust funds. These funds are primarily housed in international financial institutions
(e.g., the World Bank); are currently supported by the financial contributions of donor country
governments; and provide financial assistance for projects implemented by a variety of
organizations, including U.N. agencies, multilateral development banks, nongovernmental
organizations, and national institutions. These funds take advantage of existing large-scale

1 See White House Fact Sheet: U.S. Global Development Policy at http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/
09/22/fact-sheet-us-global-development-policy.
2 The GCCI was one of three main initiatives to the 2010 Global Development Policy that also included the Global
Health Initiative and Global Food Security.
3 For more information on this program, see the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change website at
http://unfccc.int/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/least_developed_country_fund/items/3660.php.
4 For more information on this program, see the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change website at
http://unfccc.int/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/special_climate_change_fund/items/3657.php.
5 For more information on this program, see CRS Report R41302, International Climate Change Financing: The
Climate Investment Funds (CIFs)
, by Richard K. Lattanzio.
Congressional Research Service
1

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

greenhouse gas reduction opportunities and establish investment channels for larger private sector
financing. They include the Clean Technology Fund,6 which aims to spur large-scale clean energy
investments in lower-income countries with rapidly growing emissions; the Global Environment
Facility,7 which provides incremental funding8 for energy and infrastructure projects that support
global environmental benefits; and the Program for Scaling-Up Renewable Energy in Low
Income Countries,9 which endeavors to assist the poorest countries expand energy access and
stimulate economic growth through the scaled-up deployment of renewable energy strategies.
Bilateral efforts at the Department of State and U.S. Agency for International Development
(USAID) seek to complement the multilateral investments by helping to shape development
policy and regulatory environments in the recipient countries.
Sustainable Landscapes
Sustainable landscape programs aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and
forest degradation. Bilateral and regional programs at the Department of State and USAID
support country-driven policies for forest governance, forest cover and land use change
monitoring systems, law-based resource management and land tenure, and on-the-ground efforts
to halt deforestation and foster sustainable forest-based livelihoods. Multilateral initiatives
include the Forest Investment Program,10 which tries to address the circumstances that lead to
deforestation and increased greenhouse gas emissions in select lower-income countries by
improving regulation and enforcement, mobilizing private financing, and securing the social and
economic benefits of sound forest management; and the Global Environment Facility, which
provides incremental funding for projects that support global environmental benefits such as
biodiversity and sustainable land use.
Budget Authority
The Global Climate Change Initiative is funded through programs at the Department of State, the
Department of the Treasury, and USAID (i.e., GCCI “core” agencies). Funds for these programs
are appropriated in the Administration’s Executive Budget, Function 150 account, for State,
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs. Recent trends in GCCI budget authority have seen it
fluctuate between $750 million and $950 million since FY2010,11 and it currently accounts for

6 For more information on this program, see CRS Report R41302, International Climate Change Financing: The
Climate Investment Funds (CIFs)
, by Richard K. Lattanzio.
7 For more information on this program, see CRS Report R41165, International Environmental Financing: The Global
Environment Facility (GEF)
, by Richard K. Lattanzio.
8 “Incremental” funding refers to costs associated with transforming a project with national benefits into one with
global environmental benefits. Global Environment Facility (GEF) grants aim to cover the difference or “increment”
between a less costly, more polluting option and a costlier, more environmentally sound option. In this way, GEF
funding is structured to “supplement” base project funding and provide for the environmental components in national
development agendas.
9 For more information on this program, see CRS Report R41302, International Climate Change Financing: The
Climate Investment Funds (CIFs)
, by Richard K. Lattanzio.
10 For more information on this program, see CRS Report R41302, International Climate Change Financing: The
Climate Investment Funds (CIFs)
, by Richard K. Lattanzio.
11 While the GCCI was instituted as a development initiative during the Obama Administration’s first budget
submission to Congress for FY2010, the United States has actively contributed congressionally appropriated funds for
international climate assistance for many years. However, it should be noted that prior contributions to climate
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
2

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

approximately 1.4% of total programming in the International Affairs Function 150 account
budget request.12 Recent budget authority for the GCCI was reported as $945 million in FY2010,
$819 million in FY2011, $858 million in FY2012, and $757 million in FY2013.13 The
Administration’s FY2014 GCCI budget request is $837 million. Some additional funds for
international climate change financing flow through programs at complementary agencies within
the federal government (e.g., the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency,
the Department of Agriculture); however, these allocations are defined outside the scope of the
GCCI and are not included in this report. Budget authority for GCCI programming from FY2010
to FY2014 is presented by category in Table A-1 and by account in Table A-2.
Congress is responsible for several activities in regard to the GCCI, including (1) authorizing
periodic appropriations for federal agency programs and multilateral fund contributions, (2)
enacting those appropriations, (3) providing guidance to the agencies, and (4) overseeing U.S.
interests in the programs.
Congressional committees of jurisdiction for international climate change programs at the
Department of State, the Department of the Treasury, and USAID include the following:
• the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Foreign Affairs (various
subcommittees);
• the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services,
Subcommittee on Monetary Policy and Trade;
• the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee
on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs;
• the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Subcommittee on International
Development and Foreign Assistance, Economic Affairs, and International
Environmental Protection; and
• the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations, Subcommittee on State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs.

(...continued)
assistance were often accounted for and defined in different ways. Thus, it may be difficult to compare past spending
patterns and priorities against those of the current Administration. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
reported FY2009 budget authority for activities defined as international climate change assistance for the three core
agencies as approximately $323 million. See OMB, Federal Climate Change Expenditure Reports to Congress, June
2010, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/legislative_reports/FY2011_Climate_Change.pdf;
account level budget authority from FY2009 Base Enacted (P.L. 111-8); FY2009 Bridge Enacted (P.L. 110-252);
FY2009 Stimulus Enacted (P.L. 111-5); FY2009 Supp. Enacted (P.L. 111-32).
12 Estimate based on the FY2013 International Affairs, Function 150 account, budget request of $56.2 billion for
foreign operations programming at the Departments of State, Treasury, and USAID. Considering that the International
Affairs budget generally accounts for approximately 3% of U.S. discretionary spending, the GCCI accounts for less
than 0.1% of all U.S. discretionary spending. For more detail on recent Department of State, Foreign Operations, and
Related Programs budgets, see CRS Report R43043, State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs: FY2014
Budget and Appropriations
, by Susan B. Epstein, Alex Tiersky, and Marian L. Lawson.
13 Beginning with FY2010, the State Department began reporting international climate change assistance on its foreign
aid website, ForeignAssistance.gov, at http://www.foreignassistance.gov/InitiativeLanding.aspx. Many GCCI activities
are funded at agency sub-account levels, with allocations left to the discretion of the agencies, under congressional
consultation. Thus, obligations and/or outlays could change from the enacted budget authority as offices, bureaus,
and/or missions update priorities in their operational budgets.
Congressional Research Service
3

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

FY2010 Budget Authority
H.R. 3288, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010, was enacted December 16, 2009, as P.L.
111-117. It included appropriations for the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related
Programs (Division F) that support Global Climate Change Initiative programming. Many GCCI
activities are funded by allocations at the sub-account level and were left undefined in P.L. 111-
117. Allocations for FY2010 GCCI sub-account programmatic activities in this report are as
reported by agencies on the U.S. Department of State’s “Foreign Assistance” website.14
Appropriations enacted in P.L. 111-117 related to GCCI activities include the following:
• $86.5 million for the Global Environment Facility (of which the U.S. Department
of State estimates that $37 million was allocated toward projects related to global
climate change activities, with the remainder allocated to projects related to
biodiversity, international waters, ozone protection, organic pollutants, etc.);
• $300 million for the Clean Technology Fund;
• $75 million for the Strategic Climate Fund (including the Pilot Program for
Climate Resilience and the Forest Investment Program); and
• larger account level appropriations at the Department of State, USAID, and the
Department of the Treasury, including “Development Assistance” at $2,520
million; “Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia” at $741.6 million;
“Economic Support Fund” at $6,344 million (with another $2,490 million
enacted in FY2010 Supplemental Appropriations (H.R. 4899; P.L. 111-212);
“Department of the Treasury, Debt Restructuring” at $60 million; and
“International Organizations and Programs” at $394 million. From these larger
accounts, agencies reported that $508 million in sub-account level bilateral and
regional development programming was allocated for GCCI activities.
See the Appendix for a breakdown of the FY2010 enacted budget authority.
FY2011 Budget Authority
H.R. 1473, the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011, was
enacted April 15, 2011, as P.L. 112-10. It included appropriations for the Department of State,
Foreign Operations, and Related Programs (Title IX) that support Global Climate Change
Initiative programming. Many GCCI activities are funded by allocations at the sub-account level
and were left undefined in P.L. 112-10. Allocations for FY2011 GCCI sub-account programmatic
activities in this report are as reported by agencies on the U.S. Department of State’s “Foreign
Assistance” website.
Appropriations enacted in P.L. 112-10 related to GCCI activities include the following:
• $89.8 million for the Global Environment Facility (of which the Global
Environment Facility reports that approximately 51% was allocated toward
projects related to global climate change activities, with the remainder allocated

14 http://www.foreignassistance.gov/.
Congressional Research Service
4

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

to projects related to biodiversity, international waters, ozone protection, organic
pollutants, etc.);
• $184.6 million for the Clean Technology Fund;
• $49.9 million for the Strategic Climate Fund (including the Pilot Program for
Climate Resilience, the Forest Investment Program, and the Program for Scaling-
Up Renewable Energy in Low Income Countries); and
• larger account level appropriations at the Department of State, USAID, and the
Department of the Treasury, including “Development Assistance” at $2,520
million; “Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia” at $696 million;
“Economic Support Fund” at $5,946 million; “Department of the Treasury, Debt
Restructuring” at $50 million; and “International Organizations and Programs” at
$354 million.15 From these larger accounts, agencies reported $523 million in
sub-account level bilateral and regional development programming was allocated
for GCCI activities.
See the Appendix for a breakdown of the FY2011 request and enacted budget authority.
FY2012 Budget Authority
H.R. 2055, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, was enacted December 23, 2011, as P.L.
112-74. It included appropriations for the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related
Programs (Division I) that support Global Climate Change Initiative programming. Many GCCI
activities are funded by allocations at the sub-account level and were left undefined in P.L. 112-
74. Allocations for FY2012 GCCI sub-account programmatic activities in this report are as
reported by agencies on the U.S. Department of State’s “Foreign Assistance” website.
Appropriations enacted in P.L. 112-74 related to GCCI activities include the following:
• $89.8 million for the Global Environment Facility (of which the Global
Environment Facility reports that approximately 51% was allocated toward
projects related to global climate change activities, with the remainder allocated
to projects related to biodiversity, international waters, ozone protection, organic
pollutants, etc.);
• $184.6 million for the Clean Technology Fund;
• $49.9 million for the Strategic Climate Fund (including the Pilot Program for
Climate Resilience, the Forest Investment Program, and the Program for Scaling-
Up Renewable Energy in Low Income Countries);
• larger account level appropriations at the Department of State, USAID, and the
Department of the Treasury, including “Development Assistance” at $2,520
million; “Assistance for Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia” at $627 million;
“Economic Support Fund” at $5,763 million; “Department of the Treasury, Debt
Restructuring” at $12 million; and “International Organizations and Programs” at
$349 million. From these larger accounts, agencies reported that an estimated

15 The larger account figures reflect the 0.2% rescission across all non-defense accounts for FY2011 funds, in
accordance with Section 1119(a) of P.L. 112-10.
Congressional Research Service
5

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

$482 million in sub-account level bilateral and regional development
programming was allocated for GCCI activities; and
• further, provisions for funding transfers were included, such that in consultation
with the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of State may transfer up to $200
million of the funds made available under the Economic Support Fund to funds
appropriated under the headings ‘‘Multilateral Assistance, Funds Appropriated to
the President, International Financial Institutions’’ for additional payments to
such institutions, facilities, and funds. Using these provisions, the Department of
State transferred funds to the Department of Treasury, which allocated $30
million to the Global Environment Facility (of which $15 million is considered
GCCI funding), $45 million to the Clean Technology Fund, and $25 million to
the Strategic Climate Fund during FY2012.
See the Appendix for a breakdown of the FY2012 request and enacted budget authority.
FY2013 Budget Authority
H.R. 933, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, was enacted March
26, 2013, as P.L. 113-6. Under P.L. 113-6, appropriations for the Department of State, Foreign
Operations, and Related Programs (Division F, Title VII) that support Global Climate Change
Initiative programming were funded through a continuing resolution at the same level as in
FY2012, with several changes specified as provisions in the legislation. FY2013-enacted account
level estimates were subject to the budget sequestration process as established by the Budget
Control Act of 2011 (P.L. 112-25) and the American Taxpayer Relief Act (P.L. 112-240). The
enacted State-Foreign Operations funding for FY2013 was reduced by approximately 5% through
sequestration, and those reductions were applied at the program, project, and activity level. As in
prior years, many GCCI activities are funded by allocations at the sub-account level and were left
undefined in P.L. 113-6. Allocations for FY2011 GCCI sub-account programmatic activities in
this report are as reported by agencies on the U.S. Office of Management and Budget’s Federal
Climate Change Expenditures Report to Congress
, and some account allocations as well as the
distribution among pillars have yet to be fully reported by the agencies.
Appropriations enacted in P.L. 113-6 related to GCCI activities (prior to sequestration reductions)
include the following:
• $129.4 million for the Global Environment Facility (of which the Global
Environment Facility reports that approximately 51% was allocated toward
projects related to global climate change activities, with the remainder allocated
to projects related to biodiversity, international waters, ozone protection, organic
pollutants, etc.);
• $184.6 million for the Clean Technology Fund;
• $49.9 million for the Strategic Climate Fund (including the Pilot Program for
Climate Resilience, the Forest Investment Program, and the Program for Scaling-
Up Renewable Energy in Low Income Countries);
• larger account level appropriations at the Department of State, USAID, and the
Department of the Treasury, including “Development Assistance” at $2,833
million, “Economic Support Fund” at $5,764 million, “Department of the
Congressional Research Service
6

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

Treasury, Debt Restructuring” at $12 million, and “International Organizations
and Programs” at $349 million; and
• further, the provisions for funding transfers, as they existed in P.L. 112-74, were
retained in P.L. 113-6.
See the Appendix for a breakdown of the FY2013 request and enacted budget authority.
FY2014 Budget Request
The President’s FY2014 budget requests for international climate programs at the Department of
State, the Department of the Treasury, and USAID would fund near-term climate financing of
$836.7 million across three areas:
• adaptation ($220.0 million),
• clean energy ($452.2 million), and
• sustainable landscapes ($164.5 million).
See the Appendix for a breakdown of the FY2014 request.
Key Issues for Congress
As Congress considers potential authorizations and/or appropriations for initiatives administered
through the Department of State, the Department of the Treasury, USAID, and other agencies
with international programs, it may have questions concerning the purpose, direction, efficiency,
and effectiveness of U.S. agency initiatives and current bilateral and multilateral programs that
address global climate change.
Some issues that may raise concerns over providing assistance include the following:
Fiscal Constraints. Budget constraints may lead to questions about sustaining
high levels of support for international development assistance in general, and
international climate change assistance in particular. The burden is exacerbated
during times of economic downturn, when the federal government is hard-
pressed to generate fiscal resources to adequately address domestic challenges
and maintain basic levels of public services and quality of life. Some have
suggested that retaining available funds for immediate domestic priorities, such
as fostering renewed economic growth and creating jobs, should take precedence
over global concerns for which many Americans feel less urgency and
responsibility.
Potential for Misuse. National and international institutions that dispense
financial assistance have sometimes been criticized for inefficient and bloated
bureaucracies; their lack of transparency about project procurement practices and
operating costs; and the proportion of their funds misused or lost through
instances of graft, corruption, and other political inefficiencies.16 Some suggest

16 William Easterly and Tobias Pfutze, “Where Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign Aid,”
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
7

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

revisiting operational guidance of these institutions before further appropriations
are made.
Uncertain Results. Questions remain regarding the overall effectiveness of
international financial assistance in spurring economic development and reform
in lower-income countries, and, more specifically, in addressing issues of climate
change and the environment. Many studies have examined the effects of
international assistance provided to lower-income countries, including both
bilateral and multilateral mechanisms, and have returned mixed results, making it
difficult to reach firm conclusions that may support continued contributions.
Uncertainties in Climate Science. Prevailing scientific research on the current
and future impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the global climate exhibits
varying degrees of analytical uncertainty. The lack of definitiveness in some data
and in certain model projections has been offered by some as a reason to
postpone and/or reconsider international climate change assistance policies and
programs.
Some issues that may support providing assistance include the following:
Commercial Interests. Some maintain that international climate change
assistance benefits U.S. businesses, as support for low-emission economic
growth may increase trade, commerce, and economic activity in the global
marketplace for U.S. goods and services. Increased assistance may allow some
U.S. industries to make competitive inroads into rapidly expanding markets,
improve the advancement and commercialization of U.S. technologies, mobilize
greater investment in related domestic sectors, and enhance job creation in the
United States. Decreased funding may cede American influence in global markets
to other economic powers still engaged with lower-income countries on
environmental and natural resource issues (e.g., the European Union, China).
Investment Efficiencies. Some argue that the costs of responding to tomorrow’s
climate-related catastrophes, instabilities, conflicts, and technological needs may
be significantly higher than the costs of working today to prevent them. Some
economists note that lower-income countries account for nearly all of the recent
growth in global emissions and represent the cheapest near-term opportunity to
mitigate GHG pollution as part of a cost-effective solution.
Natural Disaster Preparedness. Some claim that international climate change
assistance is a means to support natural disaster preparedness around the globe.
Assistance for adaptation activities to help “climate-proof” developing countries’
infrastructure and other sectors may help avoid future capital and other losses;
minimize the redirection of resources to ad hoc disaster response and urgent
humanitarian needs; and avoid chronic humanitarian crises, such as food
shortages, particularly for the resource poor in the least developed countries.17

(...continued)
Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 22, no. 2 (Spring 2008). For more on foreign aid reform, also see CRS Report
R40102, Foreign Aid Reform: Studies and Recommendations, by Susan B. Epstein and Matthew C. Weed; and CRS
Report R40756, Foreign Aid Reform: Agency Coordination, by Marian L. Lawson and Susan B. Epstein.
17 Both the World Bank and U.S. Geological Survey estimate that every dollar spent on disaster preparedness saves $7
in disaster response. The World Bank, Natural Disasters: Counting the Cost, March 2, 2004, at
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
8

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

National Security. Some defend international climate change assistance as a way
to address and mitigate risks to national security. According to a 2008 National
Intelligence Assessment, the impacts of global climate change may worsen
problems of poverty, social tensions, environmental degradation, and weak
political institutions across the developing world.18 Some see international
climate change assistance as a means to help make lower-income countries less
susceptible to these threats, for the benefit of both the country and the security
interests of the United States.
International Leadership. Finally, some see the promotion of international
climate change assistance to lower-income countries as a method through which
to increase U.S. leadership in global environmental issues. Through such
leadership, the United States may be able to influence and set important
international economic and environmental policies, practices, and standards.19

(...continued)
http://go.worldbank.org/NQ6J5P2D10.
18 National Intelligence Council, National Intelligence Assessment on the National Security Implications of Global
Climate Change to 2030, Statement for the Record by Dr. Thomas Fingar, Deputy Director of National Intelligence for
Analysis, National Intelligence Council,
before the U.S. Congress, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
& House Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming
, June 25, 2008, at http://www.dni.gov/nic/
special_climate2030.html.
19 For more information on the political issues involved in the international climate change negotiations, see CRS
Report R40001, A U.S.-Centric Chronology of the International Climate Change Negotiations, by Jane A. Leggett.
Congressional Research Service
9

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

Appendix. GCCI Budget Tables
Table A-1. Global Climate Change Initiative,
Core Agencies Budget Authority, FY2010-FY2014, by Category
(US$ in millions; figures appearing as an asterisk—*—have yet to be reported by the agencies)
Category/Core
FY2010
FY2011
FY2011
FY2012
FY2012
FY2013
FY2013
FY2014
Agencya
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Enacted
Request
Adaptationb 245.8
335.9
194.0
255.0
203.2
215.0 *
220.0
State 68.0
58.5
47.0
48.5
43.0
46.0
*
42.0
USAID 122.8
187.4
137.0
166.5
141.5
144.0
*
144.0
Treasury 55.0
90.0
10.0
40.0
18.7
25.0
24.0
34.0
Clean Energyc 531.6 703.5 409.1
662.1
448.3 390.0 *
452.2
State 97.6
66.8
60.5
66.0
68.0
62.5
*
80.0
USAID 108.0
128.7
124.0
129.1
92.0
86.5
*
91.5
Treasury 326.0
508.0
224.6
467.0
288.3
241.0
228.0
280.7
Sustainable
167.9 351.0 215.8
410.5
206.5 164.5
*
164.5
Landscapesd
State 35.9
30.0
17.0
27.5
22.0
12.0
*
10.0
USAID 75.0
175.0
137.4
213.0
115.0
118.5
*
113.5
Treasury 57.0
146.0
61.4
170.0
69.5
34.0
44.0
41.0
Total State
201.5
155.3
124.5
142.0
133.0
120.5
126.0
132.0
Total USAID
305.8
491.2
398.4
508.6
348.5
349.0
335.0
349.0
Total
438.0 744.0 296.0
677.0
376.5 300.0
296.0
355.7
Treasury
Total
945.3
1390.5
818.9
1327.6
858.0
769.5
757.0
836.7
Sources: U.S. Department of State, Congressional Budget Justification, Volume 2, Foreign Operations, Fiscal
Years 2010-2014; U.S. Office of Management and Budget, FY2014 Federal Climate Change Expenditures Report to
Congress
, August 2013; the U.S. Administration’s foreign assistance website, http://www.foreignassistance.gov/;
and CRS correspondence with the Departments of State and Treasury.
Notes: FY2013 appropriations totals for agencies are post-sequestration reductions as reported by OMB. The
Department of State and USAID have yet to report allocations by pillar.
a. GCCI “core agencies” include the Department of State, the Department of the Treasury, and USAID as
represented in the Department of State’s Executive Budget, Function 150 and Other International Programs
(see Table A-2 for a summary of GCCI core and complementary agencies’ budget al ocations by account).
b. Adaptation programs aim to assist low-income countries reduce their vulnerability to climate change
impacts and build climate resilience.
c. Clean Energy programs aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from energy generation and energy use by
accelerating the deployment of clean energy technologies, policies, and practices.
d. Sustainable Landscape programs aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest
degradation.
Congressional Research Service
10

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

Table A-2. Global Climate Change Initiative,
Core Agencies Budget Authority, FY2010-FY2014, by Program
(US$ in millions; figures appearing as an asterisk—*—have yet to be reported by the agencies)a
FY2010
FY2011
FY2012
FY2013
FY2014
Agency/Program/Account
Enacted
Enacted
Enacted
Enacted
Request
Department of Stateb 201.5 124.5 133.0 126.0 132.0
International Organizations—
7.5 0.0 0.0 * 0.0
International Conservation
Programs (IO&P)c
International Organizations—
13.0 10.0 10.0
* 13.0
Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change / UN
Framework Convention on
Climate Change (IO&P)
International Organizations—
23.5 25.5 27.0
* 25.5
Montreal Protocol (IO&P)
Oceans and International
145.5 80.0 90.0
* 90.5
Environment and Scientific
Affairs (ESF)d
Western Hemisphere
12.0 9.0 6.0 * 3.0
Regional (ESF)
U.S. Agency for
305.7 398.4 348.5 335.0 349.0
International
Development
e
Bilateral Country
119.0 212.5 178.0
* 173.1
(DA,f ESF,g AEECAh)
Africa Regional (DA)
8.5
8.0
8.0
*
5.0
Asia Middle East Regional
2.0
(DA) 11.5
6.0 * 3.0
Barbados and Eastern
4.5
Caribbean (DA)
5.0
5.5
* 5.5
Bureau for Policy, Planning
1.0
and Learning (DA)
0.0
0.0
* 1.0
Central Africa Regional (DA)
0.0
5.4
9.4
*
9.4
Central America Regional
6.5
(DA) 6.0
4.0 * 7.0
Central Asia Regional (ESF)
4.6
1.5
0.0
*
0.0
Democracy, Conflict and
0.0
Humanitarian Assistance—
FEWSNet (DA)
18.0
0.0
* 0.0
Democracy, Conflict and
8.5
Humanitarian Assistance—
PPM (DA)
2.0
5.0
* 11.0
East Africa Regional (DA)
5.8
8.0
7.0
*
7.0
Economic Growth,
73.0
Agriculture and Trade (DA)
76.0
82.0
* 72.0
Eurasia Regional (ESF)
10.0
10.0
3.5
*
3.5
Congressional Research Service
11

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

FY2010
FY2011
FY2012
FY2013
FY2014
Agency/Program/Account
Enacted
Enacted
Enacted
Enacted
Request
Europe Regional (ESF)
0.0
1.0
1.0
*
1.0
Latin America and Caribbean
5.0
Regional (DA)
3.5
3.0
* 5.0
Office of Development
0.0
Partners—Development
Grants Program (DA)
0.0
0.0
* 0.0
Office of Development
0.0
Partners—Private Sector
Alliances (DA)
0.0
0.0
* 0.0
Regional Development
0.0
Mission for the Pacific (DA)
0.0
0.0
* 0.0
Regional Development
17.0
Mission-Asia (DA)
18.8
23.0
* 20.5
South America Regional (DA)
0.0
4.0
5.6
*
9.0
South Asia Regional (DA)
2.0
2.0
1.5
*
0.0
Southern Africa Regional
7.0
(DA) 4.2
7.0 * 6.0
USAID Forward: Program
0.0
Effectiveness Initiatives (DA)
0.0
0.0
* 0.0
West Africa Regional (DA)
10.9
10.5
10.0
*
10.0
Department of the
438.0 296.0 376.5 296.0 355.7
Treasuryi
Tropical Forest Conservation
26.0 16.4 12.0 11.0 0.0
Act (Debt Restructuring)j
Global Environment Facilityk
37.0 45.0 60.0 63.0 72.0
(IFI)l
Clean Technology Fundm
(IFI)
300.0 184.6 229.6 175.0 215.7
Strategic Climate Fund: Pilot
55.0 10.0 18.7 24.0 34.0
Program for Climate
Resiliencen (IFI)
Strategic Climate Fund:
20.0 30.0 37.5 11.5 17.0
Forest Investment Programo
(IFI)
Strategic Climate Fund:
0.0 10.0 18.7 11.5 17.0
Scaling Up Renewable Energy
Programp (IFI)
Total
945.2 818.9 858.0 757.0 836.7
(Core Agencies)
Sources: U.S. Department of State, Congressional Budget Justification, Volume 2, Foreign Operations, Fiscal
Years 2010-2014; U.S. Office of Management and Budget, FY2014 Federal Climate Change Expenditures Report to
Congress
, August 2013; the Department of State’s “U.S. Fast Start Climate Finance” website,
http://www.state.gov/e/oes/climate/faststart/index.htm; the U.S. Administration’s foreign assistance website,
http://www.foreignassistance.gov/; and CRS correspondence with the Departments of State and Treasury.
Notes: FY2013 appropriations totals for agencies are post-sequestration reductions as reported by OMB.
Congressional Research Service
12

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

a. Figures appearing as an asterisk—*—in this table represent funding estimates that have yet to be allocated
and/or reported ful y by the agencies. As of this publication, the Department of State and USAID have
reported FY2013 post-sequestration authority at the account level, but have yet to report al ocations at the
sub-account level.
b. U.S. Department of the State GCCI figures not reported as actual are considered estimates and may change
as offices update operational budgets and outlays are finalized.
c. International Organizations and Programs account (IO&P) includes sub-account programmatic activities to
support international climate change activities, including contributions to the International Panel on Climate
Change, U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, and the Montreal Protocol Multilateral Fund.
d. Economic Support Fund account (ESF) includes sub-account programmatic activities to support international
climate change activities, including funding for the Office of Oceans and International Environmental and
Scientific Affairs (which contributes funds for adaptation programming at the U.N. Least Developed
Countries Fund (LDCF) and the U.N. Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF), clean energy programming at
the Major Economies Forum/Clean Energy Ministerial and Climate Renewables and Efficiency Deployment
Initiative, and the Global Methane Initiative, and sustainable landscape programming at the Forest Carbon
Partnership Facility), and the Office of Western Hemisphere (which contributes to the Energy and Climate
Partnership of the Americas).
e. U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) GCCI figures not reported as actual are considered
estimates and may change as offices update operational budgets and outlays are finalized.
f.
Development Assistance account (DA) includes sub-account programmatic activities to support USAID
bilateral and regional climate change activities.
g. Economic Support Fund account (ESF) includes sub-account programmatic activities to support USAID/DOS
bilateral and regional climate change activities.
h. Assistance for Europe, Eurasia, and Central Asia account (AEECA) includes sub-account programmatic
activities to support USAID bilateral and regional climate change activities. Prior to FY2009, this account
was two separate accounts: Assistance for Eastern Europe and the Baltic States and Assistance for the
Independent States of the Former Soviet Union.
i.
U.S. Department of the Treasury GCCI figures not reported as actual are considered estimates and may
change as offices update operational budgets and outlays are finalized.
j.
Debt Restructuring account (DR) includes sub-account programmatic activities to support international
climate change activities in sustainable landscapes programming including funding for the Tropical Forest
Conservation Act.
k. Global Environment Facility (GEF) is a multilateral environmental trust fund that supports climate change
activities in clean energy and sustainable landscapes programming. Established in 1991. The United States
has contributed funds annual y since 1993. Only a portion of GEF funds—as determined through GEF
programming decisions—is al ocated to climate change activities; the remaining al ocation supports other
environmental sectors (e.g., biodiversity, oceans, ozone, chemicals). The figures in the above table only
present the GEF “climate change” allocation.
l.
International Financial Institutions account (IFI) includes sub-account programmatic activities to support
organizations at the World Bank, the regional development banks, and other multilateral institutions.
m. Clean Technology Fund (CTF) (one of the two World Bank entrusted Climate Investment Funds) is a
multilateral environmental trust fund that supports climate change activities in clean energy programming.
Established in 2008. The United States has contributed funds annual y since 2010.
n. Strategic Climate Fund (SCF) (one of the two World Bank entrusted Climate Investment Funds): Pilot
Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR) is a multilateral environmental trust fund that supports climate
change activities in adaptation programming. Established in 2008. The United States has contributed funds
annual y since 2010.
o. Strategic Climate Fund (SCF) (one of the two World Bank entrusted Climate Investment Funds): Forest
Investment Program (FIP) is a multilateral environmental trust fund that supports climate change activities in
sustainable landscapes programming. Established in 2008. The United States has contributed funds annual y
since 2010.
Congressional Research Service
13

The Global Climate Change Initiative: Budget Authority and Request, FY2010-FY2014

p. Strategic Climate Fund (SCF) (one of the two World Bank entrusted Climate Investment Funds): Scaling Up
Renewable Energy Program (SREP) is a multilateral environmental trust fund that supports climate change
activities in clean energy programming. Established in 2008. The United States did not contribute funds in
2010 because the program was not yet operational.

Author Contact Information

Richard K. Lattanzio

Analyst in Environmental Policy
rlattanzio@crs.loc.gov, 7-1754

Congressional Research Service
14