Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy
Kenneth Katzman
Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs
July 10, 2013
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
RS21513
CRS Report for Congress
Pr
epared for Members and Committees of Congress

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Summary
Kuwait was pivotal to two decades of U.S. efforts to end a strategic threat posed by Iraq, because
of its location, its role as the object of past Iraqi aggression, and its close cooperation with the
United States. Kuwait remains a key to the U.S. ability to act militarily in the northern Persian
Gulf region now that all U.S. forces have left Iraq. Kuwait’s relations with the post-Saddam
government in Iraq have warmed significantly in recent years through resolution of many of the
territorial, economic, and political issues from the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. Kuwait is
increasingly suspicious of Iranian intentions in the Gulf, aligning Kuwait with U.S. efforts to
contain Iranian power in the Gulf and prevent Iran from exerting undue influence in Iraq. Still,
Kuwait maintains relatively normal economic and political relations with Iran so as not to
provoke Iran militarily or prompt it to try to empower pro-Iranian elements in Kuwait.
Although Kuwait’s foreign policy fluctuates little, its political system has been in turmoil since
2006, and has deteriorated significantly since late 2012. The political disputes in Kuwait have
centered on opposition to the political dominance of the Al Sabah family, as well as over official
corruption, security force brutality, citizenship eligibility, and other issues. These disputes,
manifested primarily in the form of opposition to the Al Sabah family within the National
Assembly, have produced repeated dissolutions of the National Assembly and new elections. The
latest suspension occurred on June 16, 2013 and triggered new elections to be held on July 27,
2013. Perhaps accelerated by the uprisings in several Arab countries since early 2011, the
disputes in Kuwait have also expanded beyond the Assembly to the general population. Public
protests expanded significantly in late 2012 to challenge the Sabah regime’s unilateral alteration
of election rules to shape the December 1, 2012 elections to its advantage. Most oppositionists
boycotted the December 1 elections, lowering the turnout but producing an overwhelmingly pro-
government Assembly. The demonstrations sometimes have been suspended after compromises
with the government.
Yet, the ruling establishment in Kuwait retains substantial assets that will likely prevent major
political change. Kuwait remains a relatively wealthy society where most citizens do not want to
risk their economic well-being to try to bring about the downfall of Al Sabah rule through
violence. Reflecting that sentiment, the opposition largely confines its demands to limiting Sabah
power rather than ending the family’s rule. To contain unrest, the government is able to use
financial largesse—budgets loaded with subsidies and salary increases—as well as some
repressive measures, including beatings and imprisonments. But, the many years of political
paralysis have led to some economic stagnation as well, because parliamentary approval for
several major investment projects has been held up due to the infighting. The lack of economic
vibrancy led to strikes in several economic sectors in 2012.
On other regional issues, in part because of its leadership turmoil, Kuwait tends to defer to
consensus positions within the Gulf Cooperation Council. This deference is evident in Kuwait’s
stances on the Israel-Palestinian dispute as well as on the uprisings in Yemen and Syria. Kuwait
has largely confined its support for the armed rebellion in Syria to financial aid. On the uprising
in Bahrain, in March 2011, Kuwait joined a Gulf Cooperation Council intervention on the side of
the government, but unlike Saudi Arabia and UAE, Kuwait sent naval and not ground forces.

Congressional Research Service

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Contents
Government and Political Reform ................................................................................................... 1
Government Structure................................................................................................................ 1
The National Assembly and Disputes With the Ruling Family ................................................. 2
Assembly Authorities .......................................................................................................... 2
The Franchise ...................................................................................................................... 2
Political Factions in and Outside the National Assembly ................................................... 2
Post-2006 Political Crises: Assembly Suspensions and Elections ............................................ 3
June 2006 Election .............................................................................................................. 4
May 2008 Election .............................................................................................................. 4
May 2009 Election .............................................................................................................. 4
2012-2013: Cycle of Frequent Elections and Increasing Demonstrations .......................... 6
U.S. Responses and Implications for U.S. Interests ............................................................ 9
Broader Human Rights Issues ................................................................................................. 10
Women’s Rights ................................................................................................................ 10
Trafficking in Persons ....................................................................................................... 11
Status of “Bidoons”and Other Expatriates ........................................................................ 11
Freedom of Expression and Media Freedoms ................................................................... 11
Labor Rights ...................................................................................................................... 12
Religious Freedom ............................................................................................................ 12
U.S.-Kuwait Relations and Defense Cooperation .......................................................................... 13
Iraq Invasion Deepens The U.S.-Kuwait Alliance ................................................................... 13
Bilateral Defense Cooperation Agreement ........................................................................ 13
Joint Efforts to Address The Continuing Threat Posed by Saddam ......................................... 14
Supporting the U.S.-Led Effort to Militarily Oust Saddam/Major Non-NATO Ally
Designation .................................................................................................................... 14
Helping U.S. Efforts to Stabilize Post-Saddam Iraq ................................................................ 14
Kuwait’s Role in Long-Term Gulf Security ............................................................................ 15
U.S. Security Assistance .......................................................................................................... 16
Arms Sales ........................................................................................................................ 16
International Military Education and Training (IMET)..................................................... 17
Foreign Policy Issues ..................................................................................................................... 18
Outstanding Bilateral Issues With Iraq .................................................................................... 18
Residual Issues from the 1990 Iraqi Invasion and Occupation ......................................... 18
Iran ........................................................................................................................................... 20
Arab-Israeli Dispute ................................................................................................................ 21
Positions and Actions on 2011 Uprisings Elsewhere in the Region ........................................ 22
Kuwaiti Cooperation Against Islamic Militancy ..................................................................... 23
Kuwaiti Economic Policy .............................................................................................................. 23

Figures
Figure 1. Map of Kuwait................................................................................................................ 26

Congressional Research Service

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Tables
Table 1. Composition of the National Assembly: 2008–2012 ......................................................... 9
Table 2. U.S. Aid to Kuwait and Purposes ..................................................................................... 17
Table 3.Some Basic Facts .............................................................................................................. 25

Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 26

Congressional Research Service

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Government and Political Reform1
Kuwait’s optimism after the 2003 fall of its nemesis, Saddam Hussein, soured after the January
15, 2006, death of Amir (ruler) Jabir Ahmad al-Jabir Al Sabah. Since then, Kuwait has lurched
from one political crisis to the next, producing a sense of economic and political stagnation. At
the time of Amir Jabir’s death, his successor, Shaykh Sa’ad bin Abdullah Al Sabah, was very ill
(he later died), and a brief succession dispute among rival branches of the ruling Al Sabah family
ensued. It was resolved with Prime Minister Shaykh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jabir Al Sabah becoming
Amir on January 29, 2006; about 83, he is the younger brother of the late Amir. The succession
dispute was unprecedented in Kuwait and the broader Gulf region for the first use of an elected
legislature’s constitutional ability to formally remove a leader.
Although the leadership question was resolved, it produced a suspension of the tacit agreement to
alternate succession between the Jabir and Salem branches of the family. Amir Sabah appointed
two members of his Jabir branch as crown prince/heir apparent and as prime minister (Shaykh
Nawwaf al-Ahmad Al Sabah and Shaykh Nasser al Muhammad al-Ahmad Al Sabah
respectively). The highest-ranking member of the Salem branch in the government was Dr.
Mohammad Al Sabah, deputy prime minister and foreign minister. Both resigned or were
replaced in 2011.
Tensions between the two branches of the family have since simmered, and no permanent
alternative mechanism has been agreed to replace the previous power-sharing pact between them.
The governmental infighting has provided rationale and additional political space for various
youth and other reform-oriented groups inspired by the Arab uprisings that began in early 2011,
and some in the ruling family have sided with the political opposition.
Government Structure
The Amir is the head of state and ruler of Kuwait. He appoints a Prime Minister, as head of
government, who in turn appoints a cabinet. The Prime Minister has always been a member of the
Sabah family, and until 2003 the Prime Minister also was Crown Prince/heir apparent. In recent
years, there has been discussion within the Sabah family of restoring the concurrency of the
Prime Minister and Crown Prince position because the National Assembly is not able,
constitutionally, to question the Crown Prince. In typical Kuwaiti cabinets, three out of four
deputy prime ministers are members of the family, as is the Defense Minister, Foreign Minister,
and Interior Minister. Each Kuwaiti cabinet has typically had at least a few family members
heading other ministries as well. The current Prime Minister is Shaykh Jabir al-Mubarak Al
Sabah, who took office in December 4, 2011. The cabinet currently has 28 ministers, plus a
Central Bank governor.
The Amir has additional broad powers. He serves as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces,
and all judges. The Amir, as noted below, has the power to suspend the National Assembly for

1 Much of this section is from the State Department’s country report on human rights practices for 2012 (released April
19, 2013), http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/index.htm?year=2012&dlid=204370#wrapper; the
International Religious Freedom Report for 2012 (May 20, 2013),
http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/religiousfreedom/index.htm?year=2012&dlid=208398#wrapper; and the Trafficking in
Persons Report for 2013
(June 19, 2013), http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/210740.pdf
Congressional Research Service
1

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

limited periods of time, and to commute prison sentences. Kuwait’s amirs can be as involved or
disengaged from day-to-day governance as they choose; Amir Sabah tends to be more active in
governance than was his predecessor.
The National Assembly and Disputes With the Ruling Family
The National Assembly, established by Kuwait’s November 1962 constitution, is the longest-
serving all-elected body among the Gulf monarchies. Fifty seats are elected, and up to 15
members of the cabinet—which is limited by the constitution to 16 members—serve in it ex-
officio
.
Assembly Authorities
While Kuwait’s constitution enshrines the hereditary monarchy, the Kuwait National Assembly
has more scope of authority than any legislative or consultative body in the Persian Gulf. It can
introduce legislation as well as consider and vote on government-introduced legislation. The
Assembly does not have the power to confirm cabinet nominees (individually or en bloc), but it
can, by simple majority of elected members, vote “no confidence” and remove individual
ministers. When the Assembly takes that step, it generally does so after parliamentary questioning
of that minister, referred to as “grilling.” The Assembly can vote no confidence in the prime
minister by voting “inability to cooperate with the government,” and it can veto government
decrees issued during periods of Assembly suspension. Amirs of Kuwait have, on several
occasions (1976-1981, 1986-1992, 2003, 2006, 2008, 2009, 2011, and 2012), used their
constitutional authority to dissolve the Assembly when it grilled or threatened to grill government
ministers. Suspension of the Assembly mandates new elections within 60 days.
Those opposing the government have tended to seek greater authority for the Assembly and a
limitation of the powers of the government and by extension, limitations of the political and
economic power of the Al Sabah. The opposition, in general, seeks a constitutional monarchy in
which the Assembly, or an elected majority faction within the Assembly, names a Prime Minister
who in turn assembles a cabinet.
The Franchise
For at least two decades, the extent of the franchise has been a closely watched indicator of
Kuwait’s political liberalization, and there has been clear progress. The government has expanded
the electorate gradually, first by extending the franchise to sons of naturalized Kuwaitis and
Kuwaitis naturalized for at least 20 (as opposed to 30) years. The long deadlock on female
suffrage began to break in May 2004, after the government submitted to the Assembly a bill to
give women the right to vote and run. (A government attempt in May 1999 to institute female
suffrage by decree was vetoed by the Assembly.) In May 2005, then Prime Minister Shaykh
Sabah (now Amir) pressed the Assembly to adopt the government bill, which it did on May 16,
2005 (35-23); the bill was effective as of the 2006 National Assembly elections.
Political Factions in and Outside the National Assembly
Political parties are still not permitted, but factions are organized and compete in Assembly
elections as “currents,” “trends,” or “political societies.” Many of these factions meet and plan
Congressional Research Service
2

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

their strategies at a parallel Kuwaiti tradition called diwaniyyas—informal social gatherings, held
at night, held by elites of all political ideologies and backgrounds. There are a growing number of
diwaniyyas organized by women. Factions in Kuwait, both in and outside the National Assembly,
are often fluid, but in general they group as follows:
The “Opposition”
“Liberals.” Highly educated elites who tend to form the core of the opposition to
the government. Many of the liberals had been part of Arab nationalist
movements in the 1960s and 1970s, and in many cases have studied abroad. In
prior years they had operated under the banner “Kuwait Democratic Forum.”
Some liberal Kuwaitis often side with the government.
Sunni Islamists. They are generally opposed to the government. Within this broad
category, there are two major groupings: those linked to the Muslim
Brotherhood, and harder line Sunnis called Salafists. Those linked to the Muslim
Brotherhood have often operated under a banner called the Islamic Constitutional
Movement (ICM).
Youths and Intellectuals. The broader opposition, outside the National Assembly,
the opposition includes youth and intellectuals, many of whom have become
more active since the Arab uprisings began in early 2011 but have been active in
Kuwait far longer than that. Since 2008, these groups have sometimes organized
during election campaigns to support liberal deputies, using such names as the
“Orange Movement” or “Fifth Fence.”
Government Supporters
“Tribalists.” Generally less educated but who dominate two out of the five
electoral districts and tend to support the government, although not universally.
At times, some tribalists in the Assembly have grouped into a faction widely
referred to as “service deputies”—Assembly members primarily focused on
steering government largesse and patronage to their constituents.
Shiites. Most in the Assembly are Islamists, assembled in a bloc called the
National Islamic Alliance. They tend to side with the government, perhaps out of
greater concern about Sunni Islamists.
Women. When in the Assembly, women, both Shiite and Sunni, have tended to
align with the government. Many women outside the Assembly, however, have
participated in opposition demonstrations.
Post-2006 Political Crises: Assembly Suspensions and Elections
The post-2006 political deadlock has manifested as repeated Assembly suspensions and
subsequent elections, none of which has resolved fundamental differences over the power balance
between the executive and the legislature. Five months after becoming leader, Amir Sabah
suspended the Assembly in May 2006 when 29 opposition members demanded to question the
Prime Minister over the government’s refusal to endorse a proposal to reduce the number of
electoral districts to five, from 25. The opposition wanted to increase the size of each district so
that it would be more difficult to influence the outcome through “vote buying” or tribal politics.
Congressional Research Service
3

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

June 2006 Election
In the June 29, 2006, election, the opposition, which attracted youth support under the “Orange”
banner, won 34 out of the 50 seats. The election was the first in which women could vote or run,
but none of the 27 women candidates won. After the election, the Amir accepted demands to
reduce the number of electoral districts to five and a law to implement that change, as of the next
election, took effect.
May 2008 Election
The schisms between the opposition and the government produced another crisis in March 2008
when the Assembly insisted on pay raises for state employees as a response to spiraling inflation.
The government refused, the cabinet resigned, and the Amir dissolved the Assembly and set new
elections for May 17, 2008. Perhaps benefitting from the move from 25 to five electoral districts,
Sunni Islamists and conservative tribal leaders won a total of 24 seats—an increase of four. Their
allies—the so-called “liberals”—won seven seats. Shiites increased their representation by one, to
a total of five seats. Pro-government and other independent tribalists held the remaining 14 seats.
As in the 2006 election, none of the 27 women candidates was elected.
After the appointment of a post-election cabinet appointments, Islamists agitated unsuccessfully
against the appointment of two female ministers: Nuriya al-Sebih, who was reappointed as the
education minister (after surviving a January 2008 no-confidence vote), and Mudhi al-Humoud, a
liberal academic, who was appointed as state minister for housing affairs and for development
affairs. Another woman, Ms. Masouma Mubarak, who was the first female minister ever in
Kuwait, had resigned in September 2007 after some members of the Assembly accused her of
mismanagement.
Sunni-Shiite tensions added to the dissension within the Kuwaiti elite. Possibly as a spillover of
sectarian tensions in post-Saddam Iraq, recriminations flared in February 2008 after several Shiite
politicians attended a public ceremony commemorating the killing earlier that month of Lebanese
Hezbollah militant Imad Mughniyah. The sectarian tensions erupted even though the Shiite
representation in the cabinet was expanded to two ministers. In November 2008, the cabinet
resigned when three Sunni Assembly deputies requested to question the prime minister over
corruption allegations and his decision to permit the visit of an radical Iranian Shiite cleric.
However, the Amir subsequently reappointed Shaykh Nasser as prime minister and did not
suspend the Assembly.
May 2009 Election
The power struggle between the government and opposition Assembly deputies resumed in
March 2009 when the Assembly insisted on questioning the prime minister over his management
of the global financial crisis and alleged misuse of public funds. The disputes had held up passage
of a proposed $5 billion fiscal stimulus and financial guarantees program. On March 19, 2009, the
Amir suspended the Assembly, triggering new elections within 60 days.
The elections were held on May 16, 2009. Turnout was relatively light at about 55% of the
385,000 eligible voters, and produced more than 20 new parliamentarians, including 4 women—
the first to be elected. They included Masouma Mubarak, mentioned above (a Shiite); Rola
Dashti, who had been narrowly defeated in 2006; and professors Aseel al-Awadhi and Salwa al-
Congressional Research Service
4

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Jassar. Perhaps reflecting the strengthened government position, immediately after the election,
the Amir reappointed Shaykh Nasser as prime minister. There had been pre-election speculation
that the
The election of the women, and the setback for Sunni Islamists, signaled to some that Kuwaiti
voters wanted an Assembly that would work with the government. However, those hopes were
dashed in November 2009, when Assembly members filed motions to question the defense
minister for alleged corruption in the arms sale process, and it demanded to question Prime
Minister Nasser for corruption in the 2008 elections. On December 8, 2009, the Prime Minister
agreed to the questioning, marking the first time in the Gulf region that a head of government had
been successfully summoned by an elected body. A motion by 10 members cited the prime
minister for “noncooperation” with the Assembly, but, on December 17, 2009, a new election was
avoided when deputies voted 35-13 to express confidence in the prime minister.
Yet, the political deadlock did not break. After the session of parliament opened on October 26,
2010, government allies were appointed to key permanent committees 2 and opposition deputies
threatened to question the Interior Minister for releasing from prison two Iranian drug traffickers.
Others sought to question why the government was slow to implement a privatization law passed
in the winter-spring 2010 Assembly session. Security forces broke up a demonstration by
parliamentarians and civil society activists on December 8, 2010 against what they asserted were
government attempts to limit National Assembly powers. The incident sparked another call to
formally question the Prime Minister. He narrowly survived a no-confidence vote on January 5,
2011 because only 22 of the 50 Assembly deputies supported the motion.3 Some saw the vote as
indicating that the government is losing support among tribal deputies mainly from the outer
districts of Kuwait City, which are inhabited by generally less affluent, naturalized citizens.4 The
vote did not resolve the disputes between the Assembly and the Al Sabah.
2011: Arab Uprisings Add to Kuwait’s Political Crises
The Arab uprisings that began shortly after the January 2011 no-confidence vote in Kuwait
brought broader opposition elements in society into the political struggles in Kuwait. After the
vote, opposition deputies, supported by youths under a banner called the “Fifth Fence,” and who
were inspired by the Arab uprisings, called for the resignation of Interior Minister Jabir al-Khalid
Al Sabah for failing to prevent the alleged torturing to death of a man in custody for illegal liquor
sales. In advance of a February 8, 2011 public protest planned to coincide with his questioning by
the Assembly, the Interior Minister resigned. The Fifth Fence postponed the planned protest until
March 8, 2011, but it attracted only a few hundred participants. Popular protests in Kuwait did not
broaden substantially, suggesting that popular frustration with governance was not as widespread
as it was in Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia, where leaders were eventually toppled. However, the crisis
within the elite continued.
The disputes within elite circles continued unabated when Shiite parliamentarian Saleh Ashour, in
March 2011, asked to question the Foreign Minister about Kuwait’s sending of naval forces to
assist Bahrain’s government in its struggle against the Shiite opposition there. Many of Kuwait’s

2 “Govt Controls Key Assembly Panels.” Kuwait Times, October 27, 2010.
3 “Kuwait’s Prime Minister Survives Parliament Vote.” Al Jazeera TV, January 5, 2011.
4 Kristin Smith Diwan, “Kuwait: Too Much Politics, or Not Enough?,” Foreign Policy online, January 10, 2011.
Congressional Research Service
5

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Shiites opposed that decision as unjustly supporting the Sunni Bahraini monarchy. Rather than
face questioning on the Bahrain issue, the cabinet resigned. Prime Minister Nasser was re-
appointed to a caretaker government, and a new cabinet, with only the Oil Minister and
Commerce Minister changing, was formed on May 8, 2011 (the seventh cabinet formed by
Shaykh Nasser since he became prime minister in 2006).
After a few months of relative quiet, the government came under renewed popular pressure in
September 2011 following reports that two of Kuwait’s largest banks had deposited $92 million
into the accounts of two National Assembly members—suggesting that the government had
sought to buy the loyalty of parliamentarians. The transfers, and those to seven other
parliamentarians, were placed under government investigation. The corruption case caused
thousands of Kuwait protesters to take to the streets on September 21, 2011, to call for the
resignation of the prime minister. On October 18, 2011, Deputy Prime and Foreign Minister Dr.
Mohammad Al Sabah, discussed earlier, resigned in protest of the alleged corruption. Two days
later, what many called the biggest demonstration in Kuwait of the year (an estimated 10,000)
demanded the prime minister’s resignation. Probably as a direct response to the allegations, on
September 25, 2011, the cabinet adopted an anti-corruption draft law.
The protests were accompanied by strikes in the oil industry and the state-run banking and health
care industry in September 2011. However, these job actions did not appear directly related to the
political disputes, but rather to disputes over pay, benefits, and working conditions.
2012-2013: Cycle of Frequent Elections and Increasing Demonstrations
The 2011-2012 National Assembly opened in late October 2011 with continued recriminations.
Opposition deputies boycotted committee meetings, and moderate liberals defected and joined
with opposition deputies, giving the opposition enough votes for a successful no-confidence
motion against the prime minister. On November 16, 2011, oppositionist in and outside the
Assembly, including the Fifth Fence, forced their way into the Assembly building and demanded
the Prime Minister’s resignation. The Amir issued a decree tightening security at the building, but
the political pressure continued and on November 28, 2011, Prime Minister Nasser resigned.
Amir Switches Prime Ministers
Rather than again reappointing Shaykh Nasser as a caretaker, the Amir appointed another royal
family member, then Defense Minister Shaykh Jabir al-Mubarak Al Sabah, as prime minister. He
was sworn in, but without first naming a new cabinet, on December 4, 2011. Two days later, on
December 6, 2011, he recommended - and Amir Sabah concurred - dissolution of the National
Assembly and new elections. Although some questioned the constitutionality of the dissolution
because a new government had not been fully formed, the country started preparing for Assembly
elections set for February 2, 2012 (within the constitutionally mandated 60 days).
Subsequently, opposition deputies began nominating themselves as candidates. Primary elections
are formally banned, although some tribes hold informal “tribal primaries” to determine who their
candidate will be. On December 6, 2011, a group of 20 opposition deputies announced they
would compete as one “Opposition Bloc.” Opposition youth leaders announced they would back
opposition deputies who would push for a fully elected government in which the prime minister is
selected by the Assembly, legalization of political parties, and election law changes. Such
announcements confirmed the fears of the royal family that dissolving the Assembly and holding
Congressional Research Service
6

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

new elections would empower oppositionists sympathetic to the 2011 Arab uprisings. However,
refusing to call a new election would have portrayed the government as attempting to cover up its
own alleged corruption. Some secular oppositionists feared that a new election would increase the
ranks of Islamist deputies, who are well organized.
February 2, 2012, Election And Aftermath
Many of the mainstream predictions appeared to be realized in the February 2, 2012, election. As
shown in Table 1 below, groups opposed to the government won at least 32 of the 50 seats.
Islamist groups increased their influence markedly and they and their allies who oppose the
government took control of the Assembly’s agenda. They benefitted at the expense of the pro-
government independent deputies who were defeated decisively, many of whom were the
Assembly members alleged to have received government funds in the scandal discussed above.
Kuwaiti liberals lost support and, in a blow to secular Kuwaitis, none of the 19 women who ran,
including the 4 incumbents, was elected. Turnout was about 62%, up from the 58% of the 2009
election. A leading opposition figure, Ahmad al-Sadun, a previous speaker (1985-1999), returned
to that post when the Assembly convened in February 2012, replacing the relatively pro-
government Jassim Al-Khurafi, a major figure in Kuwait’s merchant community.
The new government formed after the election was again headed by Prime Minister Shaykh Jabir
al-Mubarak Al Sabah. He appointed about 10 new ministers and retained the remainder. No
women were appointed. The government refused opposition demands to appoint oppositionists to
at least nine cabinet positions, appointing instead four such ministers. And, as expected, the new
Assembly immediately asserted itself: in March 2012, Shiite deputy Ashour filed a successful
motion to question the prime minister about alleged failure to fully investigate official corruption
allegations—an issue that had caused the Central Bank governor to resign in February 2012. The
Prime Minister was questioned on March 28, 2012, but opponents did not file a vote of no-
confidence motion. In May 2012, the finance minister resigned after a parliamentary “grilling,”
and, on June 12, 2012, the Minister of Social Affairs and Labor resigned rather than face
parliamentary grilling about high food prices.
With the Assembly insisting on grilling the Interior Minister, on June 18, 2012, the Amir
exercised his prerogative under Article 106 of the constitution to suspend the Assembly for one
month—a temporary suspension renewable for another two months (but with the concurrence of
the Assembly). The suspension extended almost to the holy month of Ramadan, at which time the
Assembly is not in session anyway, meaning the Assembly would be closed until October 2012.
Second Election in 2012 Triggered by Court Decision
On June 20, 2012, Kuwait’s constitutional court ruled that the December 2011 suspension was not
conducted in accordance with the constitution, on the grounds that a new cabinet had not been
sworn in before the Amir’s suspension was ordered. The court ordered the previous (elected in
2009) Assembly reinstated. Although the 2009 Assembly was friendlier to the government than
the one elected in February 2012, the ruling increased political turmoil in Kuwait. The Assembly
elected in February 2012 questioned the court’s voiding of the election, and the reinstated 2009
Assembly did not meet at all.
The government requested the constitutional court revisit the number of election districts—a
motion that its critics said was a prelude to gerrymandering districts to ensure a pro-government
Congressional Research Service
7

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

majority. The court ruled against the government on September 26, 2012, and, on October 8,
2012, the Amir formally disbanded the National Assembly under the constitution. He later set a
new election date of December 1, 2012, and simultaneously issued a decree altering the election
law to allow voters in each district to vote for only one candidate—not the four per district in
prior law. The Amir’s decision—announced as an effort to avoid chaos produced by the continued
government-Assembly power struggle—was seen by the opposition as an effort to complicate
opposition efforts to forge alliances in each district. Some observers said the Amir’s election
decree did not necessarily favor any side—in part because the opposition could benefit from “one
man one vote” just as easily as the government could. According to many observers, opposition
anger at the decree was fueled mainly by the perception of the Amir’s arbitrary exercise of power.
The opposition rallied against the revised election rules—on October 21, 2012, it held an
unprecedented demonstration, consisting of an estimated 50,000-150,000 Kuwaitis marching
toward the iconic Kuwait Towers landmark. The demonstration was suppressed by security
forces; there were injuries reported, but no deaths, and some parliamentarians and even some
younger members of the Sabah family were arrested. Smaller demonstrations took place
subsequently, including one held on October 31, 2012 calling for the freeing of outspoken
oppositionist Musallam al-Barrak, a former parliamentarian who was arrested on October 15,
2012 for allegedly insulting the Amir. On November 2, 2012, following a night of clashes
between protesters and security forces, the government announced it would enforce an October
2012 ban on gatherings of over 20 persons.
In concert with its demonstrations, the opposition announced it would boycott the December 1
elections and formed “boycott committees” to try to broaden that effort. Still, the government
went forward with the vote and implementation of the Amir’s controversial election decree. The
government reported turnout of about 40% of the approximately 400,000 eligible voters. The vote
produced an Assembly overwhelming “pro-government.” It consisted of many new members.
because 38 out of the 50 incumbents did not run for re-election. Seventeen Shiites— including
five Islamist Shiites of the National Islamic Alliance—were elected, approximately double the
highest total the Shiites have ever had in the Assembly. Three females, including Masouma
Mubarak, were elected. Some Sunni Islamists were elected, but—with the exception of two in the
Salafi grouping—they were generally not affiliated with the Sunni Islamist political societies that
have been present in the Assembly for decades.
On December 5, 2012, the Amir asked the previous Prime Minister, Shaykh Jabir Mubarak, to
form a new cabinet. The opposition continued demonstrating to try to force change on the Al
Sabah, and demonstrations, some of them large, have become a regular occurrence in Kuwait.
Kuwaiti diplomats say that some demonstrations have been called off after talks with the
government, and that the opposition is committed to nonviolence. Still, the government has tried
to move forward on long stalled legislation with a solidly supportive Assembly. One bill that was
enacted by the Assembly on March 20, 2013, gives about 4,000 “bidoons” (stateless residents,
discussed below) citizenship.
Another Court-Triggered Election in July 2013
The Amir’s election decree remained under challenge since the December 2012 election. On June
16, 2013, the Constitutional Court ruled that the Amir’s decree that each person would vote for
only one candidate (reduced from four) was constitutional, but it dissolved the Assembly on the
basis of improper technicalities in the Amir’s election decree. The Kuwaiti cabinet subsequently
set new elections (to be the sixth election in five years) for July 27, 2013. A total of 418
Congressional Research Service
8

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

candidates have registered, of which eight are female. Some opposition societies announced a
boycott but others announced they would participate, leading observers to predict that turnout of
the 435,000 eligible voters would exceed the 40% of the December 2012 election.
Although Kuwait remains in political turmoil, opposition demands continue to remain relatively
confined to calls for a constitutional monarchy, in which the elected parliament selects the
cabinet. Kuwait’s long tradition of electoral politics and political openness will help the
government avoid a call for outright regime replacement. And, many experts say, the general
economic well-being in Kuwait means that Kuwaitis have a lot to lose if the society splits
outright, and these concerns are dividing and weakening the opposition. On the other hand, those
assessments might change if the government begins to use signficant force against protests and
there are substantial protester deaths.
Some experts are concerned that the UAE and Saudi Arabia, among other Gulf states, might
encourage the Sabah family to initiate a firm crackdown that might only stoke opposition activity
further. The increase in government arrests of activists who criticize the Amir on social media
might support those taking this view.

Table 1. Composition of the National Assembly: 2008–2012

Post-Feb. 2012
Post December
Ideology/Affiliation
Post-2008 Election
Post-2009 Vote
Vote
2012 Vote
Sunni Islamist (Muslim Brotherhood and
24 14 23 4
Salafi, including tribalists. generally opposes
the government)
Liberals (general y opposition)
7
8
5
1
Popular Action Bloc (general y opposition)
0
2
4
0
Shi te (general y pro-government)
5
9
7
17
Sunni Independents (includes tribalists,
14 17 11
28
pro-business deputies and women).
Generally pro-government
Women (general y pro-government)
0 4 0
3
Included in categories above
Source: CRS, based on articles and analysis from various observers.
Note: Some members of the National Assembly might span several different categories and several sources
often disagree on precise categorizations of the members of the Assembly.
U.S. Responses and Implications for U.S. Interests
Perhaps unrest in Kuwait was relatively minor until late 2012, the Obama Administration has
made few comments on it. Apparently concerned that the situation might have been deteriorating,
on October 23, 2012—following the large protest discussed above—the State Department said the
United States “call[s] on all sides to exercise restraint.” The statement indirectly criticized the
government’s ban on large public gatherings. Still, there has been no overall alteration of the
U.S.-Kuwait relationship as a result of Kuwait’s handling of the unrest, although some U.S.
Congressional Research Service
9

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

officials are concerned that a deteriorating situation in Kuwait could complicate U.S. efforts to
maintain a capable military presence in the Persian Gulf region.
As an example of potential implications for the United States, in September 2012 some Kuwaiti
Islamist parliamentarians called for a demonstration outside the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait to
condemn the “Innocence of Muslims” video produced privately in the United States. The
parliamentarians who attended the September 13, 2012 protest withdrew from it after some
demonstrators called for storming the Embassy. The Embassy was not attacked, but anti-U.S.
sentiment could increase if the government uses violence against protesters.
The unrest has not caused an interruption or alteration to U.S. democracy programs in Kuwait,
including discussions with Kuwaiti leaders, public diplomacy, and building civil society using
funds from the Middle East Partnership Initiative (MEPI) and other accounts. In Kuwait, MEPI
funds have been used to enhance the capabilities of the media, to promote women’s rights, to
support democracy initiatives, and to provide a broad spectrum of educational opportunities.
Broader Human Rights Issues
On broader human rights issues, the latest State Department Country Report on Human Rights
Practices for 2012, released April 19, 2013, largely reiterated the criticisms of previous reports. In
May 2011, Kuwait took over Syria’s bid for a seat on the U.N. Human Rights Council.
Women’s Rights
Women have made significant strides in achieving their rights in Kuwait over the past several
years, as exemplified by their running and winning election to the National Assembly. However,
the election of women has not translated into an expansion of women in the cabinet. There was
one woman in the 2011 cabinet—Dr. Amani Khalid Burisli, who served as minister of commerce
and industry. The current cabinet has former parliamentarian Rola Dashti serving as Minister of
State for Development Affairs. As discussed above, three women were elected in the December
2012 election. In September 2012, the Higher Judicial Council decided to appoint seven women
as public prosecutors, a decision that drew strong criticism from Kuwaiti Islamists.
More broadly, women in Kuwait can drive, unlike their counterparts in neighboring Saudi Arabia,
and there are several nongovernmental organizations run by Kuwaiti women, such as the Kuwait
Women’s Cultural and Social Society, that are dedicated to improving rights for women and to
agitating on several different issues unrelated to gender. Still, women are subject to a broad array
of discriminatory practices and abuses. For example, the law does not specifically prohibit
domestic violence, although courts try such cases as assault. Successive State Department and
outside human rights reports have asserted that violence particularly against expatriate women
working in domestic service roles is frequent. Some expatriate women have also been subjected
to nonpayment of wages and withholding of passports.5

5 Fahim, Kareem. “Away From Home, Fleeing Domestic Life.” New York Times, August 2, 2010.
Congressional Research Service
10

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Trafficking in Persons
Kuwait was, for the sixth year in a row, designated by the State Department’s Trafficking in
Persons
report for 2013 (issued June 19, 2013, cited earlier) in “Tier Three” (worst level). The
designation has been maintained because, according to the 2013 report, Kuwait is “not making
sufficient efforts” to comply with minimum standards for the elimination of trafficking. The
report notes that Kuwait adopted an anti-trafficking law in March 2013, but did not demonstrate
significant efforts to prosecute and convict trafficking offenders using previously existing laws,
and there is now lead national anti-trafficking coordinating body.
Status of “Bidoons”and Other Expatriates
Non-Gulf Arabs and Asians, and approximately 106,000 stateless residents (known as “bidoons”)
continue to face discrimination. On October 26, 2010, then Prime Minister Nasser said the
government would soon implement a plan to resolve the legal and economic status of the bidoons,
although the lack of resolution contributed to the March 11, 2011, demonstration discussed above.
Following that demonstration, the government set up a “Central System for Remedying the Status
of Illegal Residents,” with a mandate to resolve the status of the bidoons within five years. During
2011, the government granted citizenship to several hundred bidoons but 100,000 bidoon
citizenship requests were pending at the end of 2012. As noted above, legislation was passed by
the National Assembly in March 2013 to give 4,000 bidoons citizenship.
Still, the issue of citizenship and immigration policy remains at issue. On September 20, 2012,
security forces raided a suburb of Kuwait City and arrested over 2,100 persons. The detainees
were alleged violators of residency laws, mostly Asians.
Freedom of Expression and Media Freedoms
Official press censorship ended in 1992, assisting the growth of a vibrant press, but successive
State Department human rights reports have asserted that the government does not always respect
the constitutional provisions for freedom of speech and the press. The government monitors
Internet communications for defamation and security reasons. And, by law, newspaper publishers
must be licensed by the Ministry of Information. The law also prohibits material that insults
Islam, the amir, the constitution, or the judicial system.
As noted, Government attempts to monitor and act against critics has increased as government-
opposition tensions have increased in recent years. One case of alleged repression against a
journalist and blogger, Mohammad Abd al Qadir al-Jasem, attracted attention from human rights
groups and some Kuwait parliamentarians. Al-Jasem was arrested in 2009 and then arrested again
on May 10, 2010, for allegedly “instigating to overthrow the regime” by slandering the prime
minister at a diwaniyya. Supporters say his treatment reflected unwarranted and unconstitutional
repression against a government critic, and Al-Jasem reportedly conducted a hunger strike while
in jail. A Kuwaiti judge ordered his release on bail on June 28, 2010. He was sentenced to one
year in jail in November 2010 but was released in February 2011.
Arrests and prosecutions have increased since the Arab uprisings began. In June 2011, two people
were arrested in Kuwait for Internet postings critical of the Kuwaiti and Bahraini leadership. In
April 2011, security officers arrested and deported 21 Egyptian nationals resident in Kuwait for
attending meetings in support of Egyptian opposition figure Dr. Mohammad El Baradei. In March
Congressional Research Service
11

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

2012, a Kuwaiti court suspended the Kuwaiti newspaper Al Dar for allegedly publishing articles
that insulted Shiites and could incite sectarian strife. In April 2012, Kuwaiti writer Mohammad al-
Mulaifi was sentenced to seven years in prison for writing on Twitter about sectarian divisions in
Kuwait. Since 2012, the Public Prosecution Office has charged 35 Kuwaitis with offending the
Amir for criticizing him on Twitter, Facebook, or other media. In mid-April 2013, outspoken
former parliamentarian Musallam al-Barrak, mentioned earlier, was sentenced to five years in
prison for insulting the Amir; his sentence was overturned on May 27, 2013. That followed the
February 2013 acquittal of five persons charged with offending the Amir.
Labor Rights
The law protects the right of workers to form and join unions, conduct legal strikes, and bargain
collectively, but contains significant restrictions. The government allows one trade union per
occupation, but the only legal trade federation is the Kuwait Trade Union Federation (KTUF).
Foreign workers, with the exception of domestic workers, are allowed to join unions, and the
government has tended not to impede strikes.
On October 10, 2011, about 3,000 customs officers went on strike demanding higher wages and
better working conditions; the action caused a temporary halt to Kuwaiti oil exports. On October
26, 2011, the government criticized the strikes as “tantamount to attacks on the state’s status,
sovereignty, its interests, and its citizens,” and “cannot be tolerated.” In early 2012, strikes briefly
grounded state-owned Kuwait Airways.
Religious Freedom
The State Department religious freedom report for 2012 (released May 20, 2013), cite earlier,
reported that the “trend” in the government’s respect for religious freedom “did not change
significantly” during 2012. Shiite Muslims (about 30% of Kuwait’s population) continue to report
official discrimination, including limited access to religious education and the perceived
government unwillingness to permit the building of new Shiite mosques. Unlike in Bahrain,
Shiites are well represented in the police force and the military/security apparatus, although they
generally are not offered leadership positions in those institutions. On the other hand, in early
April 2012, the Kuwaiti ministry that oversees houses of worship said it will begin monitoring
Shiite mourning houses known as Husseiniyas, but it also stated that it is considering providing
state funds to Shiite mosques, as it does for Sunni mosques. On June 6, 2012, the Amir refused to
sign (vetoed) a National Assembly bill stipulating the death penalty for those who curse the major
figures and symbols of Islam, including the Quran.
Kuwait has seven officially recognized Christian churches to serve the approximately 450,000
Christians (mostly foreign residents) in Kuwait. However, Islamists in the National Assembly
have sometimes sought to prevent the building of new churches in Kuwait.6 Members of religions
not sanctioned in the Quran—including about 400 Baha’i’s, 100,000 Buddhists, and 600,000
Hindus, and 10,000 Sikhs—are mostly non-citizens working in Kuwait and have not been
allowed to operate official places of worship. They have been permitted to worship in their
homes.

6 Middle East Media Research Institute. “In Kuwait, Public Debate Over Demand to Demolish Churches,” April 10,
2012.
Congressional Research Service
12

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

U.S.-Kuwait Relations and Defense Cooperation
Kuwait has been a pivotal partner of the United States through three Gulf wars: the Iran-Iraq War,
the 1991 Persian Gulf War, and Operation Iraqi Freedom (overthrow of Saddam Hussein). In all
three cases, Kuwait’s security was directly at stake, but U.S. officials stress that Kuwait went to
extraordinary lengths to support U.S. policy and operations. As a result of the complete U.S.
troops withdrawal from Iraq at the end of 2011, Kuwait’s cooperation could become even more
crucial to U.S. efforts to ensure Iraq’s stability.
A U.S. consulate was opened in Kuwait in October 1951; it was elevated to an embassy upon
Kuwait’s independence from Britain in 1961. Kuwait, the first Gulf state to establish relations
with the Soviet Union in the 1960s, was not particularly close to the United States until the Iran-
Iraq War (1980-1988). Kuwait and the United States grew politically and militarily close during
that war because of its spillover to Kuwait. Through intimidation, Iran sought to compel Kuwait
not to support Iraq in that war. Iran fired at and struck some Kuwaiti oil facilities, including the Al
Ahmadi terminal, with Silkworm surface-to-surface missiles. In 1987-1988, the United States
established a U.S. naval escort and tanker reflagging program to protect Kuwaiti and international
shipping from Iranian naval attacks (Operation Earnest Will). As part of the skirmishes between
the United States and Iran in the course of that operation, Iran attacked a Kuwaiti oil installation
(Sea Island terminal).
Iraq Invasion Deepens The U.S.-Kuwait Alliance
Believing Saddam Hussein would reward Kuwait for assisting Iraq financially and logistically
during the Iran-Iraq War, Kuwait’s leaders were shaken by the August 1990 Iraqi invasion. Iraq’s
public justification was an accusation that Kuwait was overproducing oil and thereby harming
Iraq’s ability to repay its debts and recover economically from the long war with Iran. However,
most experts believe that the invasion was a result of Saddam’s intent to dominate the Persian
Gulf politically, economically, and militarily. Kuwait was liberated by the U.S.-led January 16-
February 28, 1991, “Desert Storm” offensive that expelled Iraqi troops, and its leaders, who spent
the occupation period in exile in Saudi Arabia, were restored to power in Kuwait.
Bilateral Defense Cooperation Agreement
The U.S.-led expulsion of Iraqi forces from Kuwait in the 1991 Persian Gulf War led to a
deepening of the U.S.-Kuwait security relationship, the cornerstone of which was a broad 10-year
defense pact signed on September 19, 1991. Although the text is classified, the pact reportedly
provides for mutual discussions in the event of a crisis; joint military exercises; U.S. evaluation
of, advice to, and training of Kuwaiti forces; U.S. arms sales; prepositioning of U.S. military
equipment (armor for a U.S. brigade); and U.S. access to a range of Kuwaiti facilities, such as Ali
al-Salem Air Base, Camp Arifjan, and Camp Buehring.7 A related Status of Forces Agreement
(SOFA) provides that U.S. forces in Kuwait be subject to U.S. rather than Kuwaiti law—a
common feature of such arrangements. In September 2001, the pact was renewed for another 10
years, and it was widely assumed among experts on Kuwait that renewal in September 2011

7 Hajjar, Sami. U.S. Military Presence in the Gulf: Challenges and Prospects. U.S. Army War College, Strategic
Studies Institute. p. 27.
Congressional Research Service
13

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

would be a formality. However, neither the Defense of the State Department has announced
whether this presumed renewal schedule is operative, raising the possibility that it had earlier
been extended beyond September 2011.8
Joint Efforts to Address The Continuing Threat Posed by Saddam
U.S. and allied efforts to contain Saddam Hussein after the 1991 war depended heavily on
Kuwait. Kuwait contributed materially to the 1991 war and subsequent Iraq containment
efforts—it paid $16.059 billion to offset the costs of Desert Shield/Desert Storm and funded two-
thirds of the $51 million per year U.N. budget for the 1991-2003 Iraq-Kuwait Observer Mission
(UNIKOM) that monitored the Iraq-Kuwait border. Kuwait also contributed about $350 million
per year for U.S. military costs of Kuwait-based Iraq containment operations, including the 1992-
2003 enforcement of a “no fly zone” over southern Iraq (Operation Southern Watch), involving
1,000 Kuwait-based U.S. Air Force personnel. During the 1990s, the United States prepositioned
enough armor in Kuwait to outfit one combat brigade, and there were generally about 4,000 or
more U.S. troops stationed there at any given time. Kuwait hosted an additional 5,000 U.S. forces
during the major combat phases of Operation Enduring Freedom, which ousted the Taliban from
power in Afghanistan.
Supporting the U.S.-Led Effort to Militarily Oust Saddam/Major Non-NATO
Ally Designation

Given that Saddam Hussein had invaded Kuwait, Kuwait enthusiastically supported, although
quietly, the Bush Administration’s decision to militarily overthrow Saddam Hussein (Operation
Iraqi Freedom [OIF]). It hosted the vast bulk of the U.S. invasion force of about 250,000 forces,
as well as the other coalition troops that entered Iraq. To secure that force, Kuwait closed off its
entire northern half for weeks before the invasion. It also allowed U.S. use of two air bases, its
international airport, and sea ports; and provided $266 million in burden sharing support to the
combat, including base support, personnel support, and supplies such as food and fuel.
Recognizing Kuwait’s consistent and multi-faceted cooperation, particularly with U.S. operations
in Iraq, on April 1, 2004, the Bush Administration designated Kuwait as a “major non-NATO ally
(MNNA),” a designation held by only one other Gulf state (Bahrain). Afghanistan obtained that
designation in 2012.
Helping U.S. Efforts to Stabilize Post-Saddam Iraq
During 2003-2011, when U.S. troops were in Iraq, there were an average of 25,000 U.S. troops
based in Kuwait (not including those rotating into Iraq) at a given time, primarily supporting the
U.S. forces moving into or out of Iraq. The main U.S. staging facility in Kuwait is Camp Arifjan
and a desert firing range facility, Camp Buehring; it is at these locations that equipment from the
Iraq battlefield has been cleaned, repaired, and packed up for return to the United States or stored
in regional prepositioning sites. U.S. forces vacated Camp Doha, the headquarters for U.S. forces
in Kuwait during the 1990s, in December 2005.

8 The executive branch has not provided CRS with requested information on the current status of the pact, including its
duration and whether it has been modified in recent years.
Congressional Research Service
14

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

In order to promote Iraqi stability after the fall of Saddam Hussein, Kuwait took a number of
major steps: it built a water line into Iraq, and it ran a humanitarian operation center (HOC) that
gave over $550 million in assistance to Iraqis from 2003-2011. A Kuwaiti company, First Kuwaiti
General Trading and Contracting, was lead contractor on the large U.S. embassy in Iraq that
opened in January 2009. On April 22, 2008, Kuwait hosted a regional conference on Iraq’s
stability, which included the United States, Iran, and other neighboring countries.
According to Defense Department budget documents, Kuwait contributed about $210 million per
year in similar in-kind support to help defray the costs incurred by U.S. military personnel that
have rotated through Kuwait into or out of Iraq for operations in Iraq. For FY2012, Kuwait
contributed $350 million for these purposes, according to the FY2012 Consolidated
Appropriation (P.L. 112-74).
Kuwait served as the key exit route for U.S. troops as they implemented President Obama’s
February 27, 2009, drawdown plan and then his October 21, 2011, announcement that all U.S.
troops would be out of Iraq by the end of 2011. The United States and Iraq discussed retaining
3,000—15, 000 U.S. troops in Iraq beyond 2011 to continue training Iraqi forces. However, Iraq
and the United States were unable to agree on a legal status framework for retaining U.S. troops,
and the last U.S. troops left Iraq on December 18, 2011.
Kuwait’s Role in Long-Term Gulf Security
Prior to the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, there was discussion that the United States might build up
forces in Kuwait, with potential to intervene in Iraq if the Iraqi Security Forces run into
difficulty.9 A substantial U.S. force in Kuwait would also presumably add to U.S. capabilities to
confront Iran if disputes with the United States over its nuclear program and its role in the Middle
East and Persian Gulf were to escalate.
Even though violence in Iraq has continued, including some multi-locations high profile attacks
in July and August 2012, there has been no significant increase in U.S. forces in Kuwait. At the
time of the withdrawal, deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes told journalists that “There
are not really plans to have any substantial increases in any other parts of the Gulf as this war
winds down.”10 A staff report of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee published June 19,
2012, said that the United States will keep about 13,500 troops in Kuwait indefinitely —
somewhat less than the 25,000 there during the U.S. presence in Iraq. Then Defense Secretary
Leon Panetta noted, in his last trip to Kuwait in that post in December 2012, that there were about
13,500 U.S. troops in Kuwait.11
Some of the U.S. forces stationed in Kuwait since the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq are combat
troops, not purely support forces.12 This enhanced mix of U.S. forces in Kuwait indicates that the
United States wants to retain combat power in close proximity to both Iraq and Iran. On the other

9 http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2011/me_iraq1201_09_26.asp; Thom Shanker and Steven Lee
Myers. “U.S. Is Planning Buildup in Gulf After Iraq Exit.” New York Times, October 30, 2011; Pauline Jelinek,
“Kuwait, U.S. Still Talking About Troop Plan.” Associated Press, November 7, 2011.
10 “The Cable: Foreign Policy’s Josh Rogin.” Washington Post, December 22, 2011. p. 17.
11 Thom Shanker. “In Kuwait, Panetta Affirms U.S. Commitment to Middle East. New York Times, December 11,
2012.
12 Michelle Tan. “15,000 in Kuwait, At Least For Now.” Army Times, January 16, 2012.
Congressional Research Service
15

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

hand, the Defense Department closed a logistics hub in Kuwait in late 2012, suggesting that the
Department is not as dependent on a Kuwait presence as it was when U.S. troops were in Iraq.
Possibly signaling that Kuwait wants to be fully integrated into post-U.S. withdrawal security
structures, including with other U.S. partners, it was reported in December 2011 that NATO
discussed with Kuwait opening a center in Kuwait City. This was a follow-on to a decision taken
in Istanbul in June 2004 under the “Istanbul Cooperation Initiative (ICI).” Kuwait joined the ICI
in December 2004. The NATO center in Kuwait has not opened, to date, in part because the ICI
has languished as NATO member states face significant financial constraints.
U.S. Security Assistance
Although the threat from Iraq is low compared to what it was during the Saddam era, the United
States continues to bolster Kuwait’s defense capabilities. U.S. officials say that the U.S.-Kuwait
defense relationship, enhanced in recent years by small amounts of U.S. assistance shown in
Table 2 below, has improved the quality of the Kuwaiti military, particularly the air force. Kuwait
has received very small amounts of U.S. assistance because of its ability to fund its own security
requirements and, as noted above, Kuwait has been mainly a donor to U.S. operations rather than
a recipient of U.S. funds. As a result of Kuwaiti recruitment efforts, its military has now nearly
regained its pre-Iraq invasion strength of 17,000. In 2008, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM)
established in Kuwait a permanent platform for “full spectrum operations” in 27 countries in the
region—among its objectives is to help Kuwait establish a more capable navy.
Arms Sales
U.S. arms sales have sought to enhance Kuwait’s capability. In 2010, Kuwait agreed to purchase
$1.6 billion in U.S. defense articles and services through the Foreign Military Sales Program.
U.S. sales to Kuwait are intended to comport with the overall goals of the “Gulf Security
Dialogue” program designed to contain Iran by enhancing the individual and joint capabilities of
the Gulf states. Kuwait is not eligible to receive U.S. excess defense articles. Major post-1991
Foreign Military Sales (FMS) include the following:
• 218 M1A2 tanks at a value of $1.9 billion in 1993. Delivery was completed in
1998.
• A 1992 sale of 5 Patriot anti-missile fire units, including 25 launchers and 210
Patriot missiles, valued at about $800 million. Delivery was completed by 1998.
Some of them were used to intercept Iraqi short-range missiles launched at
Kuwait in the 2003 war.
• A 1992 sale of 40 FA-18 combat aircraft (purchase of an additional 10 is under
consideration).
• A September 2002 sale of 16 AH-64 (Apache) helicopters equipped with the
Longbow fire-control system, valued at about $940 million.
• A December 4, 2007, Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA) notification
to Congress reported a sale to Kuwait of 80 PAC-3 (Patriot) missiles and 60
PAC-2 missiles and upgrades, valued at about $1.3 billion.
Congressional Research Service
16

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

• On September 9, 2008, DSCA notified a sale of 120 AIM-120C-7 Advanced
Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM), along with equipment and
services, with a total value of $178 million.
• On August 11, 2010, the Administration notified Congress of another potential
Patriot-related sale—of 209 Patriot “Guidance Enhanced Missile-T” (GEM-T)
missiles valued at $900 million. The prime contractor for that system is
Raytheon.
• On February 27, 2012, the Administration notified Congress of a potential sale of
80 AIM-9X-2 SIDEWINDER missiles, and associated parts and support, with an
estimated value of $105 million. The sale, if completed, would help Kuwait
modernize its fighter aircraft and enhance interoperability with U.S. aircraft.
• On July 20, 2012, the Administration notified a potential sale of 60 Patriot
missiles and 20 Patriot launching stations, plus associated equipment. The total
value of the sale could reach $4.2 billion.
• On April 17, 2013, the Adminsitration notified a potential sale to Kuwait of one
C-17 cargo aircraft and associated equipment, with an estimated total cost of
$371 million.
International Military Education and Training (IMET)
As noted in Table 2 below, in recent years Kuwait has received very small amounts of funding
under the International Military Education and Training (IMET) program. However, Kuwait
sends military students to U.S. military institutions to study intelligence, pilot training, and other
disciplines. In FY2010, Kuwait spent about $9.7 million to provide such education for 216
Kuwaiti military students. IMET funding that has been provided to Kuwait has been primarily to
get Kuwait a discount for Kuwait-funded trainees in U.S. programs. There have been no U.S.
assistance to Kuwait since FY2010.

Table 2. U.S. Aid to Kuwait and Purposes
(dollars in thousands)
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10

International
-
19
14
0
10
Military Training
and Education
(IMET).
Non-Proliferation,
628
1,025
0
0
0
Anti-Terrorism,
De-Mining and
Related (NADR).

Congressional Research Service
17

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Foreign Policy Issues
Kuwait and the United States largely share a common threat perception and cooperate on a wide
range of regional issues. After the United States, Kuwait’s most important security alliance is with
the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), which consists of fellow Gulf monarchies. However, the
GCC is not perceived as able to provide Kuwait, or any of its members, with as extensive a
security umbrella as can the United States. In May 2012, Saudi Arabia proposed a close political
union among the GCC states—a position that ran into opposition from several GCC states,
including Kuwait, and was not adopted. Kuwait has a much longer experience with elections and
parliamentary process than does Saudi Arabia or the other GCC states, and most Kuwaitis are
perceived as fearful of backsliding on democracy were there to be such a GCC union.
Outstanding Bilateral Issues With Iraq
Even though Iraq no longer poses a strategic threat to Kuwait, Iraq’s stability and the bilateral
Iraq-Kuwait relationship remain paramount Kuwaiti foreign policy concerns. Kuwait has tried to
build political ties to the dominant Iraqi factions in order to ensure there is no repeat of the 1990
Iraqi invasion of Kuwait or the Iraqi Shiite-led violence that rocked Kuwait in the 1980s. Iraq’s
U.S.-built post-Saddam military is judged insufficiently strong to commit aggression against a
neighbor. The presence of U.S. forces in Kuwait further diminishes the possibility of conventional
military conflict between Iraq and Kuwait. On July 18, 2008, Kuwait named its first ambassador
to Iraq since the 1990 Iraqi invasion—Ali al Momen, a retired general. Momen is a Shiite
Muslim, and his appointment signaled Kuwait’s acceptance that Iraq is dominated politically by
Shiites.
Violence emanating from extremist groups in Iraq is a more viable threat to Kuwait. The
December 1983 bombings of the U.S. and French embassies in Kuwait and an attempted
assassination of the Amir in May 1985 were attributed to the Iran-inspired Iraqi Da’wa (Islamic
Call) Party. This is the party that Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki heads, although the party no
longer has a militia wing. Seventeen Da’wa activists were arrested for these attacks, and Da’wa
activists hijacked a Kuwait Airlines plane in 1987. In July 2011, an Iraqi Shiite militia supported
by Iran (the militia of cleric Moqtada Al Sadr) rocketed Kuwait’s embassy in Iraq and caused
Kuwait to temporarily bring its diplomats back to Kuwait. In July 2011, another Iraqi Shiite
militia, Khata’ib Hezbollah, threatened to attack workers building the Mubarak the Great port
(named after a past ruler) on Bubiyan Island, as discussed below. These and other Iraqi Shiite
militias continue to operate in southern Iraq, and a munition was fired into Kuwaiti territory in
August 2011, but these Shiite groups are said to be evolving into political movements and de-
emphasizing their armed wings.
Residual Issues from the 1990 Iraqi Invasion and Occupation
The Kuwait-Iraq relationship remains colored by the August 2, 1990 Iraqi invasion and
occupation of Kuwait, which lasted until U.S.-led forces in “Operation Desert Storm” expelled
Iraqi forces by February 28,1991. Relations remained frozen during the rest of Saddam Hussein’s
rule, and Kuwait remained wary of the post-Saddam Iraqi governments that were dominated by
Shiite Muslims. The potential for a major breakthrough in Iraq-Kuwait relations occurred on
January 12, 2011, when then Prime Minister Nasser became the first Kuwait Prime Minister to
visit Iraq since the Iraqi invasion. Kuwaiti leaders reportedly appreciated the statement by Iraqi
Congressional Research Service
18

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Prime Minister Maliki, a few days before the visit, that Iraq’s former ambitions against Kuwait
“have gone forever and will never return again.”13 These statements paved the way for Iraqi
Prime Minister Maliki’s first visit to Kuwait on February 16, 2011.
In 2011, some of the mutual suspicions briefly resurfaced. On July 23, 2011, Iraqi
parliamentarians called on Kuwait to suspend construction for its Mubarak the Great port because
it would impinge on Iraq’s attempts to expand its access to the Persian Gulf at the tip of the Faw
peninsula. Other parliamentarians alleged that Kuwait was slant drilling in the area and therefore
stealing oil from Iraq. The disputes were reminiscent of the arguments made by Saddam Hussein
to try to justify his invasion of Kuwait in 1990.
These recriminations quieted, paving the way for some issues to be resolved during a March 15,
2012, Maliki visit to Kuwait. That visit paved the way for Amir Sabah’s attendance at the March
27-29, 2012, Arab League summit in Baghdad—an event Iraq considered crucial to its efforts to
return to the Arab fold after decades of isolation. In August 2012, the Iraqi government said “Iraq
will end all pending issues with Kuwait before the start of [2013].” The Iraqi statement appeared
to be an Iraqi effort to garner support for the U.N. Security Council to remove any remaining
“Chapter 7” (of the U.N. Charter) mandates on Iraq stemming from the 1990 invasion. Kuwait’s
Prime Minister Jaber visited Iraq on June 12, 2013 and reached agreement on taking some of the
bilateral issues involving missing Kuwaitis and Kuwaiti property out of the Chapter 7 supervision
of the United Nations and replacing them with alternative mechanisms, as discussed below.
Issues Still Outstanding Between Iraq and Kuwait
Reparations Payments Continue. Kuwait has not dropped its insistence on full U.N.-supervised
reparations by Iraq for damages caused from the 1990 invasion. Iraq wants the reparations issue
closed out to cease the deduction of 5% of all its revenue that is used to pay compensation to the
victims of the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. To date, the U.N. Compensation Commission (UNCC)
created by the post-Desert Storm U.N. resolutions has paid out over $38 billion to over 100
governments, encompassing nearly 1.5 million claimants. However, about $13.6 billion is still
owed to Kuwaiti claimants, and the U.N. Secretary General’s December 14, 2012 report says it
expects to complete the compensation process by April 2015. On December 15, 2010, the U.N.
Security Council passed three resolutions—1956, 1957, and 1958 that ended Saddam-era
sanctions against Iraq, but the resolutions did not end the “Chapter 7” U.N. mandate on Iraq and
continued the 5% automatic revenue deductions.
Missing Kuwaitis and Kuwaiti National Archives. The U.N. resolutions adopted December 15,
2010, also continued the effort, required under post-1991 war U.N. resolutions (most notably
687), to resolve the fate of the 605 Kuwaitis and third party nationals missing and presumed dead
from the 1991 war, as well as that of the missing Kuwaiti national archives. A special U.N. envoy,
Gennady Tarasov, was U.N. High-Level Coordinator for these issues. In September 2011 and in
June 2012, Iraq called for an end to the mandate of Tarasov and for Iraq and Kuwait to pursue the
issue bilaterally. Tarasov retired on December 31, 2012 and, in the absence of Security Council
action on an alternative mechanism, the U.N. Secretary General appointed Victor Poliakov to
assume Tarasov’s duties.

13 “No Claim on Sovereign Kuwait, Iraqi Ambitions Gone Forever.” Arab Times (Kuwait). January 9, 2011.
Congressional Research Service
19

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

To date, the search process has resulted in finding the remains of 236 Kuwaitis. The cases of 369
Kuwaitis remain unresolved. In 2010, Kuwait made a $1 million grant to the Iraqi Ministry of
Human Rights, which is the lead Iraqi agency trying to determine the fate of the Kuwaitis. A
Tripartite Commission on the issue (Kuwait, Iraq, International Committee of the Red Cross) met
on May 18, 2011, for the first time in many years. To date, more than 10,000 trenches have been
dug to search for remains and jailed members of the Saddam regime have been interviewed.
However, the December 14, 2012 and June 17, 2013 U.N. reports on these issues said no progress
has been made recently, although there have been some excavations undertaken in Iraq in 2013.
As far as the Kuwaiti National Archives, U.N. reports on December 14, 2012 and June 17, 2013 ts
say there has been no progress locating the archives. However, Annex I to the June 17, 2013
report (U.N. document S/2013/357) contains a list of all the Kuwaiti property returned to Kuwait
by Iraq since 2002. Most recently, in June 2012, Iraq did return to Kuwait numerous boxes of
recovered tapes from Kuwait’s state radio, as well as books belonging to Kuwait University, and
keys to Kuwait’s Central Bank.
The June 16, 2013 visit of the Kuwaiti Prime Minister resulted in Iraq-Kuwait joint action to
remove these issues of missing property and persons from the Chapter 7 U.N. mandate. That was
recommended in the U.N. Secretary General’s report of June 17, 2013 (cited above) and
contained in U.N. Security Council Resolution 2107 of June 27, 2013. The Resolution formally
transferred the continuing supervision of these issues to the U.N. Assistance Mission—Iraq
(UNAMI)—under Chapter VI of the U.N. Charter (which does not carry enforcement
mechanisms as those adopted under Chapter VII).
Kuwait-Iraq Border. Disputes over the Iraq-Kuwait border have also been mostly resolved. Under
post-1991 Gulf war U.N. Security Council Resolution 833, the Council accepted the U.N.-
demarcated border between them. Kuwait has sought that the post-Saddam government in Iraq
formally acknowledge its commitments under the resolution to pay some of the costs of border
markings and signs. In July 2010, Kuwait gave preliminary approval to open a special border
crossing into Iraq that would facilitate the work of international oil companies working in Iraq.
And, as a consequence of the March 15, 2012, Maliki visit to Kuwait, Iraq agreed to pay its
portion of the costs of maintaining the border markings. The issue of the sea border markings and
related issues was resolved in early 2013. The resolution of these issues paved the way for
Kuwait to support the termination of the High Level Coordinator mandate on the missing Kuwaiti
persons and property issue discussed above.
Other Outstanding Bilateral Disputes/Iraqi Airways. Among other residual issues from the
Saddam era, in 2004, Kuwait reportedly pledged to forgive a substantial portion of the $25 billion
Saddam era debt, but it has not written off the debt to date. Another major dispute concerned
Kuwait Airways’ lawsuits alleging that Iraq owed Kuwait $1.2 billion for planes and parts stolen
during the Iraqi invasion; the actions led to the long-term impoundment of Iraqi Airways jets. The
March 15, 2012, Maliki visit resolved the issue with agreement for Iraq to pay Kuwait $300
million in compensation, and to invest $200 million in an Iraq-Kuwait joint venture to form a
small new airline. Subsequent to the visit, Iraq-Kuwait direct flights resumed.
Iran
For the years after the Iraqi invasion, Kuwait supported Iran as a potential counterweight to
Saddam Hussein. Kuwait often hosted pro-Iranian Iraqi Shiite oppositionists against Saddam,
even though these same Shiite groups had conducted attacks in Kuwait in the 1980s, as noted.
Congressional Research Service
20

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Since Saddam’s fall, Kuwait has largely joined U.S. efforts to contain Iran and to enact strict
international sanctions to compel it to curb its nuclear program. In May 2010, Kuwait confirmed
that it had arrested some Kuwaiti civil servants and stateless residents for allegedly working on
behalf of the Qods (Jerusalem) Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) of Iran in
a plot to blow up Kuwaiti energy facilities.14 (The Qods Force, named as a terrorism supporting
entity by the United States, is the IRGC unit that supports pro-Iranian movements and conducts
espionage in neighboring and other foreign countries.) The Qods Force activity in Kuwait
suggested that Iran might be looking to pressure Kuwait because of its alliance with the United
States. In March 2011, a Kuwait court sentenced two Iranians and a Kuwaiti to death in the
alleged plot. Kuwait expelled three Iranian diplomats, and Iran expelled three Kuwaiti diplomats
in response. The sentences were commuted to life in prison on May 28, 2012. A visit to Kuwait
by Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi on May 19, 2011 resulted in agreement for both
sides agreed to return their respective ambassadors. In November 2011, Iran arrested several
individuals in Iran who it alleged were “Kuwaiti spies.”
Kuwait also is cooperating with the growing global consensus to sanction Iran. This cooperation
has come despite the comments by the Amir in November 2009 endorsing Iran’s right to purely
peaceful nuclear energy. In July 2010, a U.S. law, P.L. 111-195 (the Comprehensive Iran
Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010) was enacted that would penalize firms
that supply gasoline to Iran. A Kuwaiti gasoline trading firm, Kuwait’s Independent Petroleum
Group, was reported to be a supplier of gasoline to Iran,15 although the firm has told U.S. officials
it stopped doing so as of September 2010. In September 2012, Kuwaiti naval forces—as well as
those of all the Gulf Cooperation Council states—participated in U.S.-led mine clearing exercises
in the Persian Gulf—exercises apparently intended to signal to Iran the strength of a U.S.-led
coalition to contain Iran.
Arab-Israeli Dispute
For many years after Kuwait’s liberation in 1991, the Iraqi invasion and occupation colored
Kuwait’s foreign relations. Kuwait was more critical than were the other Gulf states of the late
Palestinian leader Yasir Arafat because he had opposed war to liberate Kuwait from Iraq. Kuwait
expelled about 450,000 Palestinian workers after liberation, viewing them as disloyal. Kuwait
subsequently maintained consistent ties to Arafat’s Palestinian antagonist, Hamas, and in March
2006, Kuwait pledged $7.5 million per month in aid to the Hamas-led government in the
Palestinian territories. Kuwait has supported Qatari and Saudi efforts to broker Fatah-Hamas
reconciliation and unity governments. At a March 2, 2009, conference in Cairo, Kuwait pledged
$200 million for Gaza reconstruction following the Israel-Hamas War of December 2008-January
2009.
Still, Kuwait has not, as have Saudi Arabia and Qatar, stepped forward as a major mediator in
intra-Palestinian disputes. Nor has it publicly advanced its own proposals for resolving the Israeli-
Palestinian dispute. It supports U.N. recognition of the State of Palestine, requested formally by
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas at the U.N. General Assembly meetings in
September 2011.

14 “Iran Spy Cell Dismantled in Kuwait.” Associated Press, May 6, 2010; “Iran Cell Planned Attacks in Kuwait,
Minister Says. Reuters, April 21, 2011.
15 http://www.defenddemocracy.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11788115&Itemid=105.
Congressional Research Service
21

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

During the period of active Gulf-Israel negotiations (1992-1997), Kuwait attended multilateral
working group peace talks with Israel—sessions on arms control, water resources, refugees, and
other issues that were begun as part of the “Oslo Accords process” between Israel and the
Palestinians. However, Kuwait did not host any sessions of the multilaterals. In 1994, Kuwait was
key in persuading the other Gulf monarchies to cease enforcement of the secondary (trade with
firms that deal with Israel) and tertiary (trade with firms that do business with blacklisted firms)
Arab boycotts of Israel. However, Kuwait did not, as did Qatar and Oman, subsequently
exchange trade offices with Israel, amounting to a renunciation of the primary boycott (boycott
on direct trade with Israel).
Positions and Actions on 2011 Uprisings Elsewhere in the Region
Kuwait has acted in concert with other GCC states on the uprisings in the Middle East that began
in 2011. Kuwait’s support for regional efforts that coincide with U.S. interests, such as in Syria,
were the main topic of Secretary of State John Kerry’s visit to Kuwait on June 26, 2013.
Kuwait has paid the closest attention to the situation in Bahrain, which is a fellow GCC; Kuwait
sent a naval unit to support the March 14, 2011 intervention of the GCC’s “Peninsula Shield” unit
to assist Bahraini security forces. The nearly 2,000 GCC ground forces that entered Bahrain were
Saudi troops and UAE police. The Kuwaiti naval unit returned to Kuwait in July 2011 following
the end of the state of emergency there. The GCC intervention was at odds with U.S. policy to
support dialogue between Bahrain’s government and protesters, and not repression. The Kuwaiti
intervention also put the Sabah government at odds with Kuwaiti Shiites. At the risk of Kuwaiti
Shiite criticism, then Prime Minister Nasser visited Bahrain during July 9, 2011.
On Libya, Kuwait supported the Arab League position in favor of U.N.-mandated intervention to
protect civilians but, initially, it stopped short of recognizing the Transitional National Council
(TNC) as the legitimate representative of the Libyan people (an action that Qatar and the UAE
have taken). In April 2011, it did pledge about $177 million in financial aid to the TNC. It
recognized the TNC as the sole legitimate representative after the fall of Tripoli in August 2011.
As a GCC state, Kuwait cooperated with developing and implementing the GCC plan for a
peaceful transition of power in Yemen. That effort bore fruit with the departure of President Ali
Abdullah Saleh in January 2012 and the subsequent presidential elections in March 2012.
Because Syria is aligned with Iran, Kuwait and the other GCC states are hoping that Bashar Al
Assad of Syria will be ousted—an outcome that would bring Sunni Muslims to power instead of
the Alawite community and weaken Iran strategically. All the GCC countries voted with other
Arab League countries to suspend Syria’s membership in that body in November 2011 and they
all closed their embassies there entirely by April 2012. Also in April 2012, the GCC states
proposed provided $100 million in funding to the armed opposition, and Kuwait is reported to be
contributing funds, but apparently not arms, to the Syrian rebels. There reportedly are also efforts
by wealthy Kuwaitis to contribute funds to the rebels.16 On January 30, 2013, Kuwait hosted a
major donors’ meeting to aid Syrian civilian victims of the conflict; $1.5 billion was pledged at
that meeting, including $300 million from Kuwait. In April 2013, Kuwait pledged another $300

16 Joby Warrick. “Wealthy Donors Influence Syria War.”
Congressional Research Service
22

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

million in humanitarian aid for the Syria crisis - $275 million to nine U.N. agencies and $25
million to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).
Kuwait has not contributed troops to the U.S. and NATO stabilization operation in Afghanistan.
Other GCC states Bahrain and UAE have contributed forces or police to that mission. In July
2011, Kuwait contributed $1 million to help relieve the effects of drought in Somalia.
On Egypt, Kuwait has adopted a position somewhat at odds with some other GCC states. Qatar
was the major Gulf financial benefactor of Egypt during the presidency of Muslim Brotherhood
senior figure Mohammad Morsi. Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates are wary of the
Brotherhood and did not aide Morsi’s government during his rule. After Morsi was deposed by
the Egyptian military on July 3, 2013, both Kuwait and the UAE announced large financial
pledges to help the beleaguered Egyptian economy. Kuwait announced it would give Egypt a $2
billion loan; a $1 billion grant; and a grant of $1 billion worth of oil and other petroleum
products.17
Kuwaiti Cooperation Against Islamic Militancy18
The State Department report on global terrorism for 2012 (released May 30, 2013) credited
Kuwaiti leaders with maintaining efforts to counter terrorism and violent extremism, despite
lacking of a clear legal framework for prosecuting terrorism-related crimes or terrorism financing.
There were no significant attacks attributed to terrorist or terrorist organizations in Kuwait in
2012. On November 27, 2011, security services arrested three Kuwaiti military officials on
suspicion of links with a terrorist cell plotting to attack locations in Bahrain and Qatar. Pro-
Iranian groups and agents are in Kuwait are discussed in the sections above on Iran and Iraq.
Kuwait is a member of the Middle East North Africa Financial Action Task Force (FATF), but it
has been identified by that body as having deficiencies in combating terrorism financing. Kuwait
has developed an action plan with the FATF to address the weaknesses. Some Kuwait-based
organizations have proved problematic in the past. On June 13, 2008, the Treasury Department
froze the assets of a Kuwaiti charity with alleged links to Al Qaeda—the Revival of Islamic
Heritage Society—under Executive Order 13224. Past State Department terrorism reports have
praised Kuwait’s programs to encourage moderation in Islam in Kuwait.
In April 2011 Kuwait introduced biometric fingerprinting at Kuwait International Airport and has
since extended that system to land and sea entry points. The NADR funds shown above have
been used, in large part, to assist Kuwait with counterterrorism efforts, border control, and export
controls.
Kuwaiti Economic Policy
The global financial crisis of 2008-2009 caused unrest in Kuwait over falling stock prices and the
effects of lower oil prices. As noted above, executive-legislative disputes delayed passage of
stimulus measures to address the crisis. However, as the crisis abated, the National Assembly

17 “Kuwait Offers Egypt $4B Aid, Fuel Package.” Associated Press, July 10, 2013.
18 For the 2012 State Department country report on terrorism, see: http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2012/209982.htm.
Congressional Research Service
23

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

passed legislation, which took effect September 2010, to privatize major sectors of the Kuwait
economy. The planned privatization of Kuwait Airways is reportedly moving forward as well.
However, some Kuwaitis, particularly those newly naturalized and less affluent than longtime
citizens, fear that privatization will bring higher unemployment.
Still, the IMF and other observers say that Kuwait has underinvested in capital infrastructure, and
overspent on public sector salaries and subsidies. The Kuwaiti budgets in 2011 and 2012
appeared intended to calm or avoid unrest rather than to set Kuwait up for long-term growth. In
August 2012, the Ministry of Finance released data showing that it has a budget surplus of about
$47 billion—primarily because the political crisis has stalled capital investment. In addition, the
political deadlock in Kuwait has caused foreign direct investment in Kuwait to lag that of its
neighbors significantly. Only $800 million has been invested in Kuwait in the past 10 years. In
contrast, in the same time period, $10 billion was invested in Bahrain, $73 billion in UAE, and
$130 billion in Saudi Arabia.19
The political deadlock in Kuwait has also prevented movement on several major initiatives, the
most prominent of which is Project Kuwait. The project, backed by the Kuwaiti government,
would open Kuwait’s northern oil fields to foreign investment to generate about 500,000 barrels
per day of extra production. The Assembly has blocked the $8.5 billion project for over a decade
because of concerns about Kuwait’s sovereignty, and observers say no compromise is in sight. A
project to build a fourth oil refinery, estimated to cost $8 billion, also has not advanced.
The 2008 financial crisis, coupled with the political infighting, also caused Kuwait to shelve the
formation of a joint venture with Dow Chemical to form the largest maker of polyethylene. On
December 29, 2008, the government cancelled the venture. It was to have required a Kuwaiti
investment of $7.5 billion by state-run Petrochemical Industries Co. – Kuwait, and Dow
Chemical had finalized the joint venture agreement in November 2008. Dow had planned to use
the proceeds of the investment to fund its purchase of the Rohm and Haas chemical firm,
although that deal ultimately went through anyway. In May 2013, an arbitrator decided in favor of
Dow Chemical, ordering the Petrochemical Industries Co. – Kuwait to pay Dow $2.2 billion in
damages for severing the venture.
The state-owned oil industry still accounts for 75% of government income and 90% of export
earnings. The United States imports about 260,000 barrels per day in crude oil from Kuwait
(about 3% of U.S. oil imports). Total U.S. exports to Kuwait were about $2.7 billion in 2012, the
the same as the few preceding years, consisting mostly of automobiles, industrial equipment, and
foodstuffs. Total U.S. imports from Kuwait in 2012 were about $13 billion, of which almost all
was crude oil and other petroleum products.
Like other Gulf states, Kuwait sees peaceful uses of nuclear energy as important to its economy,
although doing so always raises fears among some in the United States, Israel, and elsewhere
about the ultimate intentions of developing a nuclear program. Kuwait is cooperating with the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to ensure international oversight of any nuclear
work in Kuwait.
There are ongoing discussions about reviving the project. In 1994, Kuwait became a founding
member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In February 2004, the United States and

19 “Kuwait in Crisis As Ruling Family Splits, MP’s Rebel.” Reuters, June 7, 2011.
Congressional Research Service
24

Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Kuwait signed a Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA), often viewed as a prelude
to a free trade agreement (FTA), which Kuwait has said it seeks. Kuwait gave $500 million worth
of oil to U.S. states affected by Hurricane Katrina.

Table 3.Some Basic Facts
Leadership
Amir: Shaykh Sabah al-Ahmad al-Jabir Al Sabah. Crown Prince/heir
apparent: Shaykh Nawwaf al-Ahmad al-Jabir Al Sabah. Prime Minister:
Shaykh Jabir al-Mubarak Al Sabah
Population
About 2.7 million, of which 1.4 million are citizens.
GDP (purchasing power parity, PPP)
$166 billion (2012)
Religions
Muslim 85% (Sunni 70%, Shi te 30%); other (Christian, Hindu, Parsi)
15%
GDP per capita (PPP)
$43,800/yr (2012)
GDP growth rate
6.3% (2012)
Inflation 3.2%
(2012)
Oil (proven reserves)
102 billion barrels (7% of world proven reserves)
Oil exports
2.15 million barrels per day (mbd)
Source: CRS; CIA, The World Factbook reports, IMF.


Congressional Research Service
25


Kuwait: Security, Reform, and U.S. Policy

Figure 1. Map of Kuwait

Source: CRS.

Author Contact Information

Kenneth Katzman

Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs
kkatzman@crs.loc.gov, 7-7612

Congressional Research Service
26