Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and
Related Statistics

Kelsi Bracmort
Specialist in Agricultural Conservation and Natural Resources Policy
May 21, 2013
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R43077
CRS Report for Congress
Pr
epared for Members and Committees of Congress

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

Summary
Wildfires can have beneficial and harmful impacts on ecosystems (e.g., by reducing fuel loads, or
by damaging communities and timber resources). These impacts are generally measured and
discussed based on the priorities of humans in these ecosystems. Federal resources are typically
deployed during wildfire season—an annual occurrence of intense wildfire activity—to help
manage wildfires and potentially minimize some of the impacts, including the loss of life and
property. The primary agencies for federal wildfire response are the Forest Service and the
Department of the Interior. Federal wildfire response activities involve preparedness, suppression,
fuel reduction, site rehabilitation, and more.
More than 9.3 million acres burned during the 2012 wildfire season, which was the third-largest
acreage burned annually since 1960. The total amount of wildfire management (WFM)
appropriations for 2012 was approximately $2.7 billion, not including an additional $407.5
million appropriated in 2013 to repay 2012 WFM wildfire suppression accounts. Over the last
five years, WFM appropriations on average have steadily increased relative to earlier years. This
leads some to question whether federal resources for wildfire management are being used
efficiently.
This report provides wildfire management statistics (e.g., number of wildfires, acres burned,
select state wildfire activity, firefighter personnel), presents WFM appropriations from fiscal
years 2008 to the present, and discusses two related issues—wildfire suppression funding
estimation and air tanker readiness.

Congressional Research Service

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
What Is Wildfire Management (WFM)? .......................................................................................... 1
WFM Statistics ................................................................................................................................ 2
WFM Appropriations by Account (FY2008-Present) ...................................................................... 5
Preparedness .............................................................................................................................. 7
Suppression................................................................................................................................ 8
Hazardous Fuels ........................................................................................................................ 9
Emergency Funding ................................................................................................................... 9
Related Issues ................................................................................................................................ 10
Wildfire 10-Year Suppression Average and FLAME Suppression Estimate ........................... 10
WFM Large Air Tankers .......................................................................................................... 13

Figures
Figure 1. Total Number of Wildfires and Acres Burned (1983-2012) ............................................. 3
Figure 2. WFM Appropriations, FY1994-FY2013 .......................................................................... 5
Figure 3. Forest Service Suppression Costs Comparison—Observed and Predicted .................... 12
Figure 4. DOI Suppression Cost Comparison—Observed and Predicted ..................................... 13
Figure 5. Wildfire Aircraft ............................................................................................................. 14

Tables
Table 1. Total Number of Wildfires, Acres Burned, and WFM Appropriations, 2008-2012 ........... 4
Table 2. Top Three States for Wildfire Acres Burned, 2008-2012 ................................................... 4
Table 3. Total Hazardous Fuels Acres Treated by FS and DOI, FY2008-FY2012 .......................... 4
Table 4. FS and DOI Firefighting Personnel, Fatalities, and Structures Burned, FY2008-
FY2012 ......................................................................................................................................... 4
Table 5. WFM Appropriations FY2008-Present .............................................................................. 6
Table 6. WFM Emergency Funds FY2008-Present ....................................................................... 10

Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 14

Congressional Research Service

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

Introduction
The 2012 wildfire season was notable because about 9.3 million acres burned across the United
States—the third-largest annual acreage burned, based on the reporting of fire statistics from 1960
to the present.1 Some predict conditions that could lead to similar wildfire activity in 2013 in
certain regions, and possibly an earlier start for the 2013 wildfire season in certain regions due to
ongoing drought conditions in the western half of the nation.2 Wildfire (or wildland fire),3 an
unplanned and an unwanted fire, is a concern to some because it can lead to loss of human life,
damage communities and timber resources,4 and impact soils, watersheds, water quality, and
wildlife.5 On the other hand, wildfire can also reduce fuel loads, increase ecosystem health, and
restore fire-adapted ecosystems.
There are several ongoing concerns regarding wildfire management (WFM). These include the
total federal costs of wildfire, the impact of wildfire on both the quality of life and the economy
of communities surrounding wildfire activity, and the strategies and resources used to manage
wildfire. Many of these issues are deliberated by Congress, with annual WFM appropriations
being a good indicator of how Congress prioritizes and addresses certain WFM concerns. More
than $2.7 billion was appropriated for WFM in FY2012.
This report briefly describes WFM statistics and appropriations for 2008 to the present.6 The
report also briefly discusses two related issues: wildfire suppression funding estimation and air
tanker readiness.
What Is Wildfire Management (WFM)?
WFM is a series of coordinated activities undertaken by federal, state, and local authorities to
resolve wildfire events when they occur. Resolution may involve immediate and aggressive
measures to quickly suppress a wildfire (e.g., large air tanker response for a wildfire moving
quickly toward a populated area), or may involve immediate but less intense measures (e.g.,

1 The largest fire year on record for acres burned is 2006 (9.8 million). The second- and third-largest fire years are 2007
and 2012, and the acres burned are relatively equivalent. National Interagency Fire Center, Current Year-to-Date by
State (2012)
, December 20, 2012; http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_stats_YTD2012.html, National Interagency
Fire Center, Total Wildland Fires and Acres (1960-2009).
2 National Weather Service, U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook May 2-July 31, 2013, May 2, 2013; National Interagency
Fire Center, National Significant Wildland Fire Potential Outlook Period—May, June and July through August, May 1,
2013.
3 The terms wildfire and wildland fire are often used interchangeably. However, each term has a distinct definition. The
National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) defines wildland fire as any non-structure fire that occurs in the
wildland, defined as an area in which development is essentially nonexistent, except for roads, railroads, power lines,
and similar transportation facilities, and where structures, if any, are widely scattered. NWCG defines wildfire as an
unplanned, unwanted wildland fire including unauthorized human-caused fires, escaped wildland fire use events,
escaped prescribed fire projects, and all other wildland fires where the objective is to put the fire out. National Wildfire
Coordinating Group, Glossary of Wildland Fire Terminology, July 2012. This report will use the term wildfire for both.
4 For more information on wildfire damages to homes and resources, see CRS Report RL34517, Wildfire Damages to
Homes and Resources: Understanding Causes and Reducing Losses.
5 For more information, see CRS Report RL30755, Forest Fire/Wildfire Protection.
6 Appropriations data and statistics prior to 2008 are available in CRS Report RL33990, Federal Funding for Wildfire
Control and Management.
Congressional Research Service
1

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

monitoring a grassland wildfire where there is no immediate threat to humans and weather
conditions are favorable for natural suppression of the fire within a short time period).
WFM activities are generally categorized as relating to preparedness, suppression, fuel reduction,
or site rehabilitation. Preparedness is any activity that leads to a safe, efficient, and cost-effective
fire management program, and includes the range of tasks necessary to build, sustain, and
improve the capability to protect against, respond to, and recover from domestic incidents.7
Suppression is all of the work associated with extinguishing or confining a fire.8 Fuel reduction is
manipulation (including combustion) or removal of fuels to reduce the likelihood of ignition
and/or to lessen potential damage and resistance to control.9 Site rehabilitation includes efforts
undertaken, generally within three years of a wildfire, to repair or improve fire-damaged lands
unlikely to recover to a management-approved condition, or actions taken to repair or replace
minor facilities damaged by fire.10
A number of federal, state, and local agencies can and do respond to wildfire.11 It is sometimes
necessary for more than one agency to respond, depending on where the fire occurs, the potential
threats, and the expertise required. In these instances, the National Interagency Fire Center
(NIFC) coordinates the national mobilization of resources for wildfire and other incidents
throughout the United States.12 NIFC is comprised of eight agencies and organizations.13
WFM Statistics
Wildfire statistics help to illustrate past U.S. wildfire activity. Most of the statistics provided in
this section are national in scope. The number of wildfires reported and acres burned for 1983 to
2012 is shown in Figure 1. The data indicate that the number of wildfires reported has stayed
about the same over time. The amount of acres burned has increased steadily over time. Table 1
gives total WFM appropriations for 2008 through 2012, along with the corresponding number of
wildfires and acres burned. Table 2 lists the three states with the largest number of wildfire acres
burned for 2008 to 2012.
NIFC reports that in 2012 there were 67,774 wildfires and 9.3 million acres burned (data
compiled for federal and state agencies).14 Approximately 2% of the wildfires reported in 2012
were classified as large or significant wildfires.15 Approximately 75% of the wildfires reported

7 National Wildfire Coordinating Group, Glossary of Wildland Fire Terminology, July 2012.
8 Ibid.
9 Ibid.
10 U.S. Department of the Interior, Interagency Burned Area Emergency Response Guidebook, February 2006.
11 For more information on federal assistance, see CRS Report R41858, Federal Assistance for Wildfire Response and
Recovery
.
12 The National Interagency Mobilization Guide identifies standard procedures that guide the operations of multi-
agency logistical support activity.
13 The agencies and organizations are the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the U.S. Forest Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, the National Business Center, and the U.S. Fire Administration. Also, a National Association of State
Foresters representative is located at NIFC. Additional information about the role of each agency is available in the
NWCG Communicator’s Guide for Wildland Fire Management: Fire Education, Prevention, and Mitigation Practices.
14 NIFC, Wildland Fire Summary and Statistics Annual Report 2012.
15 Significant fires are defined as fires that are a minimum of 100 acres in timber fuel types, or 300 acres in grass and
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
2


Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

occurred on state or other land, but approximately 75% of the acres burned were on federal land.
Of all the land management agencies, the FS had the largest percentage (10%) of wildfires, in
terms of number of fires occurring on federal land. The BLM and FS had the largest percentage
of acres burned on federal land, at 36% and 29%, respectively.
Both the FS and Department of the Interior (DOI) keep statistics on hazardous fuels treated: a
measure that may help to prevent wildfire activity.16 Hazardous fuel treatment includes prescribed
burning, thinning, and more. Acres treated for FS and DOI lands are provided in Table 3.
Wildfires can have a devastating impact. Therefore, statistics showing the level of destruction a
wildfire can cause can be useful. Some more easily quantifiable measures include acres burned,
lives lost (firefighters and civilians), structures destroyed, and suppression costs for a specific
wildfire. There is no clearinghouse for this type of “destructive” data. Multiple federal and state
organizations collect different data. Therefore, the data can usually be found, but in a piecemeal
fashion. Firefighter personnel data for the FS and DOI, firefighter fatalities, and structures burned
are provided in Table 4.
Figure 1. Total Number of Wildfires and Acres Burned (1983-2012)

Source: NIFC.

(...continued)
brush fuel types, or are managed by a Type 1 or 2 Incident Management Team. An incident management team consists
of the incident commander and appropriate general and command staff personnel assigned to an incident. Type refers to
resource capability. A Type 1 resource provides a greater overall capability due to power, size, capacity, etc., than
would be found in a Type 2 resource.
16 Additional information on hazardous fuels removal is available in the “WFM Appropriations” section of this report.
Congressional Research Service
3

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

Table 1. Total Number of Wildfires, Acres Burned, and WFM Appropriations,
2008-2012

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
No. of Fires
78,979
78,792
71,971
74,126
67,774
Acres
Burned
5,292,468 5,921,786 3,422,724 8,711,367 9,326,238
Total WFM Appropriations
$4,461.5 $3,751.1 $3,357.7 $2,812.6 $2,620.5
(FS & DOI) ($ in millions)a
Source: NIFC, Agency Budget Justifications, and Appropriations Committee legislation.
Notes: Includes appropriations from the FS WFM account, the DOI Department-Wide Programs WFM
account, and emergency funds. Does not include state fire assistance or volunteer fire assistance funding under
the FS State and Private Forestry account. Appropriations for state fire assistance under the FS State and Private
Forestry (S&PF) account had an annual average of $33.9 million from 2008-2012. Appropriations for volunteer
fire assistance under the FS S&PF account had an annual average of $6.5 million from 2008-2012.
a. Corresponds to the fiscal year.
Table 2. Top Three States for Wildfire Acres Burned, 2008-2012
2008 2009 2010 2011
2012
TX – 1,570,586
AK – 2,951,597
AK – 1,129,421
TX – 2,722,623
ID – 1,667,654
CA – 1,339,839
TX – 753,261
ID – 613,868
NM – 1,286,487
OR – 1,256,049
NM – 487,652
NM – 421,481
NM – 231,403
AZ – 1,016,428
MT – 1,220,655
Source: NIFC, Historical yearend fire statistics by state.
Table 3. Total Hazardous Fuels Acres Treated by FS and DOI, FY2008-FY2012
(in millions)
FY2008
FY2009
FY2010
FY2011
FY2012
FS 3.04
3.56
3.26
2.77
2.62
DOI 1.26
1.50
1.30
0.99
1.00
Source: Email from FS on April 25, 2013. Email from DOI on April 19, 2013. DOI reports data are from the
National Fire Plan Operations Reporting System.
Table 4. FS and DOI Firefighting Personnel, Fatalities, and Structures Burned,
FY2008-FY2012
FY2008
FY2009
FY2010
FY2011
FY2012
FS firefightersa 10,480
10,480
10,480
10,480
10,480
DOI firefightersb 3,666
3,664
3,664
3,664
3,447
Firefighter fatalitiesc 25
15
8
12
15
Structures burnedd 3,956
1,899
788
5,246
4,244
Source: Agency budget justifications. Firefighter fatalities for FY2008 through FY2011 from NIFC, Historical
Wildland Firefighter Fatality Reports; Firefighter fatalities for FY2012 from NWCG, Fatalities, Entrapments and
Serious Accident Summary for 2012 Safety Gram; Structures burned year-end totals provided by NIFC in an
email on May 7, 2013.
a. FS firefighter data include personnel for hot shot crews, other firefighters, smoke jumpers, and prevention
technicians.
Congressional Research Service
4


Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

b. DOI firefighter data include firefighters, smoke jumpers, and Type 1 crews. Although provided in the DOI
justification, CRS omitted fire program and support staff from the DOI firefighter total. DOI reports that
the personnel data do not include administratively determined (AD) emergency firefighters that are hired
for short durations, often for a single incident. AD firefighter data can fluctuate significantly based on need.
Source: E-mail from DOI on May 2, 2013.
c. Corresponds with calendar year.
d. Structures include primary residences, commercial buildings, outbuildings, and seasonal dwel ings.
Corresponds with calendar year.
WFM Appropriations by Account (FY2008-Present)
WFM has been a responsibility of the federal government for over a century. WFM
appropriations are funded in the annual Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies
appropriations bill. FS and DOI are the primary supervisory agencies receiving WFM
appropriations.17 WFM appropriations for both agencies combined has averaged $3.5 billion from
FY2008 to present, with a peak of $4.5 billion in FY2008 (Figure 2).18 A dramatic increase in
WFM appropriations occurred after 2000, partly in response to the severe 2000 fire season.19
Figure 2. WFM Appropriations, FY1994-FY2013
(millions of dollars)

Source: Agency budget justifications and CRS Report RL33990, Federal Funding for Wildfire Control and
Management.
Notes: Figure 2 includes for FY2013 the additional sum of $407.5 million appropriated in 2013 to repay 2012
FS and DOI WFM wildfire suppression accounts.

17 FS traditionally carries out wildfire response in national forests and national grasslands. DOI traditionally carries out
wildfire response in national parks, wildlife refuges and preserves, and Indian reservations, and on public lands.
18 This includes emergency funds (e.g., supplemental appropriations, FLAME).
19 For more information, see CRS Report RL33990, Federal Funding for Wildfire Control and Management.
Congressional Research Service
5

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

A majority of WFM appropriations goes to the FS. From FY2008-FY2012, the FS received on
average 75% of the total WFM appropriations. In addition, FS WFM appropriations constitute a
large portion of the FS overall discretionary funding total. For example, in FY2012 FS WFM
appropriations were nearly 41% of the total discretionary funds appropriated to the FS.20
Each agency’s WFM appropriations are distributed into several subaccounts. Three major
subaccounts receive the bulk of the appropriations: preparedness, suppression, and hazardous
fuels reduction. Additionally, emergency funds are an aspect of WFM appropriations that gain
attention, as they can have a dramatic impact on the total WFM appropriations spent in one year.
A breakdown of the WFM appropriation subaccounts and emergency funds is provided in Table
5
.
Table 5. WFM Appropriations FY2008-Present
($ in millions)
FY2008
FY2009a FY2010 FY2011b FY2012c FY2013d
FS 3,269.5
2,826.6
2,501.8
2,033.6
2,285.1
2,688.9
Preparedness 665.8
675.0
675
673.7
1,004.4
1,004.4
Suppression 845.6
993.9
997.5
995.5
537.9e 534.8
Hazardous fuelsf 310.1
323.1
335.3g 324.6 312.1 317.1
Emergency fundsh 1,326.0i 700.0j — — —
400.0k
FLAMEl —

413
290.4
315.4
317.3
Other 122
134.6
156
149.4
115.3
115.3
Rescission —


-400.0


Use of prior year funds


-75.0



DOI 1,192.0
924.5
855.9
779.0
575.4
826.3
Preparedness 276.5
281.8
290.5
290.5
276.5
279.5
Suppression 289.8
335.2
383.8
399.0
270.5
276.5
Hazardous fuel reduction
199.6
203.1
206.2
183.3
183.0
145.3
Emergency fundsh 384
65.0m — — — 7.5k
FLAMEl —

61
60.9
91.9
92.4
Other 42.1
39.4
39.4
45.3
25.1
25.1
Rescission of unobligated
— — —
-200.0
-82.0 —
balances
Use of emergency funds




-189.6

Use of prior year fundsm —

-125.0



Total 4,461.5
3,751.1
3,357.7
2,812.6
2,860.5
3,515.2

20 Calculation does not include FLAME funds or supplemental funds. FLAME funds and supplemental funds are to be
used in select circumstances. While FLAME funds and supplemental funds were used in FY2012, it is not a given that
the circumstances requiring their use will happen each year. FLAME funds are to be used to cover the costs of large or
complex fires, when amounts provided in the FS and DOI WFM accounts for suppression and emergency response are
exhausted.
Congressional Research Service
6

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

Source: Annual agency budget justifications and conference reports on P.L. 110-116, P.L. 110-161, P.L. 110-329,
P.L. 111-5, P.L. 111-8, P.L. 111-32, P.L. 111-88, P.L. 112-10, P.L. 112-74, P.L. 112-175, and P.L. 113-6.
Notes: Does not include state fire assistance or volunteer fire assistance funding under the FS State and Private
Forestry account. Appropriations for state fire assistance under the FS S&PF account had an annual average of
$33.9 million from 2008-2012. Appropriations for volunteer fire assistance under the FS S&PF account had an
annual average of $6.5 million from 2008-2012.
a. Includes funding in P.L. 111-8 and P.L. 111-32 as wel as in P.L. 111-5, the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). ARRA funds were available for use in FY2009 or FY2010.
b. Reflects across-the-board 0.2% reduction.
c. Data provided do not reflect the across-the-board rescission of 0.16% for FY2012.
d. Data provided do not take into account the Joint Committee Sequester for FY2013. Data obtained from FS
and DOI budget justifications.
e. Includes $240 million in carryover emergency fire suppression.
f.
Excludes funds used for biomass grants ($5.0 million annual y, FY2009-FY2012), Community Wood Energy
Program ($5.0 million in FY2011), and Forest Biomass for Energy Program ($15.0 million in FY2011). These
funds could be used for energy from federal land biomass, but could also be used for energy from non-
federal land biomass.
g. Does not include $10.0 million moved to the Integrated Resources Restoration line item.
h. Excludes emergency funds provided for other specified activities, such as site rehabilitation, fuel reduction,
or state assistance.
i.
Includes funding of $329.0 million from P.L. 110-116, of which $110.0 million was for emergency wildfire
suppression, $100.0 million was to repay accounts in FY2007 for wildfire suppression, $80.0 million was for
hazardous fuels reduction and hazard mitigation activities ($30.0 mil ion for work on state and private lands,
$25.0 million was for rehabilitation and restoration of federal lands, and $14.0 million was for
reconstruction and construction of federal facilities. Also includes funding of $222.0 million from P.L. 110-
161 for urgent wildfire suppression activities and funding of $775.0 million from P.L. 110-329 for emergency
wildfire suppression and related activities.
j.
Includes funding of $200.0 million appropriated in P.L. 111-32 to cover necessary expenses for wildfire
suppression and emergency rehabilitation activities. Also includes funding of $500.0 million appropriated in
P.L. 111-5 of which $250.0 million is for hazardous fuels reduction, forest health protection, rehabilitation,
and hazard mitigation activities on federal lands, and $250.0 million is for state and private forestry activities
including hazardous fuels reduction, forest health and ecosystem improvement activities on state and private
lands.
k. Funding appropriated to the FS and DOI in FY2013 to repay accounts in FY2012 for wildfire suppression in
P.L. 112-175. Includes $400.0 million appropriated to the FS in FY2013 to repay accounts in FY2012 for
wildfire suppression in P.L. 112-175. Includes $23.0 million appropriated to DOI to repay accounts in
FY2012 for wildfire suppression in P.L. 112-175; P.L. 113-6 rescinded $7.5 million of the $23.0 million made
available to DOI in P.L. 112-175.
l.
Since FY2010, reflects appropriations to the FLAME wildfire suppression reserve account.
m. Includes funding of $50.0 million appropriated in P.L. 111-32 to cover necessary expenses for wildfire
suppression and emergency rehabilitation activities, and funding of $15.0 million provided in the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-5) for hazardous fuels reduction.
n. Applied to DOI WFM suppression account.
Preparedness
Appropriations for preparedness are used to support efforts that assist with fire prevention and
detection, equipment, training, and baseline personnel. The FS reports that the preparedness
program “ensures agency capability to protect life, property, and natural resources while assuring
an appropriate, risk informed and effective response to wildfires that is consistent with land and
Congressional Research Service
7

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

resource management objectives.”21 Examples of items funded under the FS preparedness
subaccount include Web-based decision support tools, central management of aviation assets, and
predictive service analysis.
Over the last five years, both the FS and DOI preparedness subaccounts have received the largest
or second- largest share of their total WFM appropriations during the annual appropriations
process. There was an increase of close to 50% in the FS preparedness funding amount from
FY2011 ($673.7 million) to FY2012 ($1,004.4 million). This was mostly due to a restructuring of
the preparedness and suppression subaccounts which included shifting aviation charges and other
charges to the preparedness subaccount. The funding level for the DOI preparedness subaccount
has seen little deviation over the last five years.
Suppression
There are three tiers of WFM suppression funding: appropriations to the suppression subaccount
(annual appropriations process), appropriations to the FLAME wildfire suppression reserve
subaccount (annual appropriations), and emergency suppression (emergency appropriations
legislation). This section of the report focuses on appropriations to the suppression subaccount.
FLAME and emergency suppression appropriations are discussed in the emergency funding
section. Annual suppression estimates contained in the President’s budget consider the 10-year
suppression average. The 10-year suppression average is more fully explored in the “Related
Issues” section.
Suppression subaccount appropriations are used primarily for wildfire response. The FS reports
that funding from this subaccount is used to “efficiently suppress wildland fires on or threatening
National Forest System lands and other Federal and non-Federal lands under fire protection
agreements.”22 DOI reports that wildfire response activities range from “intensive suppression
when wildfires on public lands threaten communities, high value resources, or critical
ecosystems, to monitoring wildfires in areas where burning accomplishes resource benefits or
where it is too dangerous to place firefighters.”23
From FY2008 to FY2011, the suppression subaccount received the greatest level of funding
compared to all other FS subaccounts. However, the amount of FS suppression appropriations is
now second to preparedness appropriations, due to the budget restructuring that occurred in
FY2012.24 Some items covered by the FS suppression subaccount are firefighter salaries, aviation
asset operations, incident support function, and suppression resources for DOI incidents on a
reciprocal non-reimbursement basis. The FS suppression subaccount also covers personnel and
resources for the Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) program.25 Items covered by the
DOI suppression subaccount include select personnel expenses above what is covered by the

21 U.S. Forest Service, Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Justification, April 2013.
22 Ibid.
23 U.S. Department of the Interior, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2014 Wildland Fire
Management
.
24 A similar budget restructure was not found for DOI.
25 The objective of the BAER program is to determine the need for and to prescribe and implement emergency
treatments on Federal Lands to minimize threats to life or property resulting from the effects of a fire or to stabilize and
prevent unacceptable degradation to natural and cultural resources.
Congressional Research Service
8

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

preparedness subaccount, temporary emergency firefighters, and aircraft flight operations and
support.
Hazardous Fuels
Hazardous fuels (FS) or hazardous fuel reduction (DOI) appropriations are used to decrease fuel
loads, or alter the arrangement of fuel loads, on federal lands to make fires less intense and more
controllable. Appropriations for this subaccount are used for fuel reduction on federal lands and
to treat high-priority areas in the wildland-urban interface (WUI).26 More specifically, DOI
reports that the hazardous fuel reduction program “removes or modifies vegetation to restore and
maintain healthy, diverse ecosystems; reduces wildfire risks to communities and their values;
reduces the risk of severe and potentially dangerous wildfire behavior; lessens post-wildfire
damage; and limits the spread and proliferation of invasive species and detrimental pathogens.”27
Since 2008, the hazardous fuels subaccount has received the third-largest share of WFM
appropriations for both agencies.
Emergency Funding
Emergency funds for WFM are typically appropriated through legislation that supplements the
annual appropriations law. WFM emergency funds have usually been provided at the end of the
fiscal year or at a time of severe wildfire activity. In general, bill or report language specifies how
the emergency funds are to be used (e.g., for suppression, for state and private forestry activities).
WFM emergency funds, including FLAME funds, have at times been at the same level or higher
than the top-funded three WFM subaccounts during the regular appropriations bills—
preparedness, suppression, and hazardous fuels. A breakdown of emergency funds since 2008 is
provided in Table 6.
For the purposes of this report, funding appropriated under the Federal Land Assistance,
Management, and Enhancement (FLAME) Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-88) of the WFM account is
considered a type of emergency funding.28 FLAME is a reserve fund for suppression activities
and is not technically listed as an emergency fund line item for WFM appropriations. However,
FLAME funds may only be used under certain conditions. DOI reports that the “FLAME fund is
used for the most severe, complex, and threatening fires, and as a contingency reserve if the
agencies exhaust their regular suppression funding due to an active fire season.”29 The Secretary
of the Interior declared that DOI conducted suppression operations on 19 wildfires on Interior

26 For more information on WUI, see CRS Report RS21880, Wildfire Protection in the Wildland-Urban Interface.
27 U.S. Department of the Interior, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2014 Wildland Fire
Management
.
28 FLAME funds are to be used to cover the costs of large or complex fires, when amounts provided in the FS and DOI
WFM accounts for suppression and emergency response are exhausted. The requirements are the same for the two
accounts. Each Secretary may transfer funds from the FLAME fund into the respective WFM account, for suppression
activities, upon a secretarial declaration. The declaration may be issued if the fire covers at least 300 acres or threatens
lives, property, or resources, among other criteria. The conferees on the FY2010 bill stated their intent that the money
in the FLAME funds, together with appropriations through the Wildland Fire Management accounts, should fully fund
suppression needs and prevent borrowing funds from other programs.
29 U.S. Department of the Interior, Budget Justifications and Performance Information Fiscal Year 2014 Wildland Fire
Management
.
Congressional Research Service
9

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

land that were eligible for FLAME funding in FY2012.30 The FS reports the Secretary of
Agriculture signed two declarations covering 61 fires that met the criteria required to be eligible
for FLAME funds in FY2012.31 There are not enough data to determine if FLAME is working as
intended because it has only been in existence for a few years.
Table 6. WFM Emergency Funds FY2008-Present
($ in millions)

FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013
FS Total
1,326.0
700.0
413.0
290.4
315.4
717.3
Emergency appropriations
1,326.0
700.0



400.0 a
FLAME


413.0
290.4
315.4
317.3
DOI Total
384.0
65.0
61.0
60.9
91.9
107.9
Emergency appropriations
384.0
65.0



15.5a
FLAME


61.0
60.9
91.9
92.4
Total 1,710.0
765.0
474.0
351.3
407.3
825.2
Source: Annual agency budget justifications and conference agreements for select Interior appropriations laws.
a. Funding appropriated to the FS and DOI in FY2013 to repay accounts in FY2012 for wildfire suppression in
P.L. 112-175. Includes $400 million appropriated to the FS in FY2013 to repay accounts in FY2012 for
wildfire suppression in P.L. 112-175; Includes $23.0 million appropriated to DOI to repay accounts in
FY2012 for wildfire suppression in P.L. 112-175; P.L. 113-6 rescinded $7.5 million of the $23.0 million made
available to DOI in P.L. 112-175.
Related Issues
Wildfire 10-Year Suppression Average and FLAME Suppression
Estimate

The WFM suppression appropriation subaccount receives considerable interest from Congress.
This is partly because of the amount of funding allocated for WFM suppression, but also because
of scrutiny about the accuracy of annual WFM suppression estimates. When WFM suppression
estimates for a fiscal year are provided to Congress by federal land management agencies fall
short of what is needed, additional funds may have to be issued via emergency appropriations, or
funds may have to be transferred from non-WFM suppression accounts, which could impact the
performance outcomes of those non-WFM suppression accounts.
The FS recognizes that “fire suppression costs are skyrocketing and seriously jeopardizing [the
FS’s] ability to fund [the FS] natural resource mission.”32 There are at least two ways the FS
calculates wildfire suppression costs. A 10-year suppression average is used to estimate the

30 Ibid.
31 U.S. Forest Service, Fiscal Year 2014 Budget Justification, April 2013.
32 U.S. Forest Service, The U.S. Forest Service - An Overview.
Congressional Research Service
10

Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

outyear budget request for wildfire suppression.33 The FLAME suppression calculation is used to
estimate within fiscal year expenditures.
For at least the last two decades, the FS and DOI have estimated annual wildfire suppression
outyear costs by using a 10-year suppression average. The moving 10-year average is based on
actual suppression obligations reported at the end of the fiscal year. Each end-of-year obligation
is adjusted to constant dollars. Once an average is calculated, $350.0 million is subtracted to
account for a recent budget restructuring where funding was transferred from the suppression
subaccount to the preparedness subaccount. This figure is then inflated for the upcoming budget
year, resulting in the final 10-year suppression average.34
FLAME (P.L. 111-88) requires the Secretaries of the Interior and Agriculture to submit to
Congress a report periodically throughout the year that contains estimates of anticipated wildfire
suppression costs. This estimation is made using econometric models which include weather and
climate variables.35 The FLAME analysis for March 2013 indicates that from 2000 to 2011 annual
observed FS wildfire suppression costs exceeded the FLAME forecasts seven times (2000, 2002,
2003, 2004, 2006, 2008, and 2011) (Figure 3).36 The same analysis indicates that from 2000 to
2011 annual observed DOI wildfire suppression costs exceeded the FLAME forecasts five times
(2000, 2002, 2003, 2008, and 2011) (Figure 4).37
The FS has explored alternatives to the 10-year average for the outyear estimate, including the
use of regression models to better estimate WFM suppression costs, and non-biophysical policy
remedies that might reduce wildfire suppression expenditures (e.g., guidelines about when it is
appropriate not to aggressively suppress wildfires).38 Additionally, it has been suggested that
more funding for hazardous fuel reduction could lower suppression costs.39 FLAME already
requires the best available climate, weather, and other relevant data, and models and other
analytical tools be used to estimate anticipated wildfire suppression costs.

33 Outyear is the fiscal year following the year covered in a budget.
34 Wildfire 10-year suppression average explanation provided by the FS in an email on April 2, 2013.
35 E-mail from the FS May 14, 2013.
36 DOI. Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement (FLAME) Act Suppression Expenditures for Interior
and Agriculture Agencies: FLAME March 2013 Forecasts for Fiscal Year 2013
(February 7, 2013).
37 Ibid; Email from FS May 15, 2013.
38 Karen L. Abt, Jeffrey P. Prestemon, and Krista M. Gebert, “Wildfire Suppression Cost Forecasts for the US Forest
Service,” Journal of Forestry, June 2009; Geoffrey H. Donovan, Jeffrey P. Prestemon, and Krista Gebert, “The Effect
of Newspaper Coverage and Political Pressure on Wildfire Suppression Costs,” Society and Natural Resources, vol. 24,
no. 8 (2011).
39 Gary Snider, P. J. Daugherty, and D. Wood, “Irrationality of Continued Fire Suppression: An Avoided Cost Analysis
of Fire Hazard Reduction Treatments Versus No Treatment,” Journal of Forestry, vol. 104, no. 8 (December 2006).
Congressional Research Service
11


Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

Figure 3. Forest Service Suppression Costs Comparison—Observed and Predicted
(in 2004 dol ars)

Source: Email from FS May 15, 2013; DOI. Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement (FLAME) Act
Suppression Expenditures for Interior and Agriculture Agencies: FLAME March 2013 Forecasts for Fiscal Year 2013

(February 7, 2013).
Notes: Values are in constant 2004 dol ars and exclude the Wildland Fire Suppression Cost Pool expenditures.
Observed historical USDA Forest Service suppression expenditures and the forecasts of these expenditures use
the September 2012 FLAME Forecast Model.

Congressional Research Service
12


Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

Figure 4. DOI Suppression Cost Comparison—Observed and Predicted
(in 2004 dol ars)

Source: Email from FS May 15, 2013; DOI. Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement (FLAME) Act
Suppression Expenditures for Interior and Agriculture Agencies: FLAME March 2013 Forecasts for Fiscal Year 2013

(February 7, 2013).
Notes: Values are in constant 2004 dol ars. Observed historical Department of the Interior suppression
expenditures and the forecasts of these expenditures use the September 2012 version of the DOI FLAME Act
Forecast Model.
WFM Large Air Tankers
Aircraft have been used for decades as a part of WFM response. Multiple types of aircraft (e.g.,
large air tankers, single-engine air tankers, or helicopters) may be used given the wildfire
conditions (Figure 5). Aircraft are able to be used to, in part, drop fire retardant, ignite prescribed
fires, deliver equipment, transport firefighters, and provide reconnaissance of new fires.
Additional aviation resources at FS’s disposal for WFM are Modular Airborne Firefighting
systems (MAFFS)—owned by the Department of Defense—and support available through
agreements with state cooperators and Canada.
The size of the fleet of large air tankers has declined over the years; the FS reports a reduction
from 43 air tankers in 2000 to 11 air tankers in 2011, and reports that the average age of aircraft
still in service is more than 50 years old. 40 The FS reports that for the 2013 wildfire season, it

40 USDA Forest Service, Large Airtanker Modernization Strategy, February 2012.
Congressional Research Service
13


Wildfire Management: Federal Funding and Related Statistics

“expects to have available for wildfire suppression up to 26 airtankers, including seven Next
Generation airtankers, eight Legacy aircraft, up to three Very Large Airtankers through contracts
and eight airtankers through an agreement with the Department of Defense.”41
FS aviation needs have been studied multiple times, with at least four studies completed since
2000.42 The studies generally conclude that additional aviation resources are needed, but
conclusions differ on the type, quantity, and costs of the resources needed.
The FS reports that funding for air tankers comes from the preparedness and suppression
subaccounts.43 Exclusive use air tanker contract costs (e.g., availability costs) are taken from the
preparedness subaccount.44 When an air tanker is in use for fire response purposes, funding is
drawn from the suppression subaccount. The suppression subaccount also covers additional call-
when-needed air tankers. The exclusive use air tanker contract budget had an annual average of
$29.5 million from FY2008-FY2012, ranging from a high of $33.4 million in FY2010 to a low of
$20.7 million in FY2012.45
Figure 5. Wildfire Aircraft

Source: Jeremy P. Meyer, “Officials disagree on ability of nation’s old, thin air tanker fleet,” June 17, 2012; U.S.
Forest Service Rocky Mountain Area Coordination Center; and CAL FIRE Air Program.

Author Contact Information
Kelsi Bracmort
Specialist in Agricultural Conservation and Natural Resources Policy
kbracmort@crs.loc.gov, 7-7283


41 U.S. Forest Service, “U.S. Forest Service issues notice of intent to award “Next Generation” airtanker contracts,”
press release, May 6, 2013.
42 Blue Ribbon Panel Report to the Chief, USDA Forest Service and Director, USDI Bureau of Land Management.
Federal Aerial Firefighting: Assessing Safety and Effectiveness, December 2002; Fire Program Solutions LLC,
Wildland Fire Management Aerial Application Study, October 2005; National Interagency Aviation Council,
Interagency Aviation Strategy, 2007 (modified by U.S. Forest Service in 2009); RAND Corporation, Air Attack Against
Wildfires: Understanding U.S. Forest Service Requirements for Large Aircraft
, 2012.
43 Email from FS on May 14, 2013.
44 The FS pays two fees for airtankers, an availability rate (fixed) to guarantee the planes are available and a flight use
rate (variable). The availability rate is usually charged by the day, while the flight use rate is usually charged by the
hour. The 2012 FS Large Airtanker Modernization Strategy reports that, “since 2007, contract costs for daily airtanker
availability have more than doubled—from just over $15 million in 2007 to $33 million in 2010,” and that “the increase
in airtanker availability costs in the last few years is directly attributable to maintaining the airworthiness and safety of
50 year old aircraft for the firefighting mission.”
45 Email from FS on May 14, 2013.
Congressional Research Service
14