U.S. Household Savings for Retirement
in 2010

John J. Topoleski
Analyst in Income Security
April 30, 2013
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R43057
CRS Report for Congress
Pr
epared for Members and Committees of Congress

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Summary
Whether households have sufficient savings from which to ensure adequate income throughout
retirement is a concern of households and, therefore, policymakers. The retirement income
landscape has been changing over the past few decades. Although most households are eligible to
receive Social Security benefits in retirement, over the past 30 years, the types of non-Social
Security sources of retirement income have been changing. About half of the U.S. workforce is
covered by an employer-sponsored pension plan. An increasing number of employers offer
defined contributions (DC) pension plans (i.e., tax-advantaged accounts in which employee, and
sometimes employer, contributions accrue investment returns) in lieu of traditional defined
benefit (DB) pension plans (i.e., monthly payments to a retiree by a former employer). This shift
in the nature of employer-sponsored pensions places more responsibility on workers to financially
prepare for their own retirement. Households also save for retirement using Individual Retirement
Accounts (IRAs), into which contributions, up to a specified limit, are tax-deductible for
individuals without an employer-sponsored pension or who have an employer-sponsored pension
and who earn less than specified limits.
Congress has several reasons for its interest in the retirement preparedness of American
households: income from Social Security may be insufficient to provide for an adequate standard
of living in retirement for U.S. households; congressional actions may encourage or discourage
employer and household efforts to provide for their own well-being in retirement; and the U.S.
Treasury will forego $117 billion in FY2013 as a result of tax policies that are designed to
encourage employer and worker retirement savings. President Obama’s FY2014 budget would
prohibit contributions to DC pension plans and IRAs that have a value over $3.4 million. This
threshold is specified to be equivalent to the maximum annual payment allowed from a DB
pension plan, which is $205,000 in 2013.
This report provides data on a variety of household wealth measures in 2010 from the Federal
Reserve’s triennial Survey of Consumer Finances. Although the amount of retirement assets is the
primary focus of the report, other measures of wealth (such as the amount of total assets, financial
assets, total debt, net worth, and housing equity) are also included. The report classifies the
amount of assets and debt by the age of the head of the household for both single and married
households. In general, the amount of household wealth is higher for married households than for
single households. Household wealth generally increases as the age of the head of the household
increases, although some measures decrease for those households in which the head of the
household is aged 75 or older. In general, the median values are less than the average values,
which is an indication that some households hold relatively large amounts of wealth compared
with most households.
Among households with retirement assets, households in which the head is younger than 55 years
old are more likely to own DC pension plan assets than they are likely to own assets from IRAs,
whereas households in which the head is aged 55 or older are more likely to have IRA assets.
Ownership of a principal residence is likely to be a factor that affects the accumulation of
retirement assets. An important saving goal for younger households is home ownership, whereas
preparing for retirement is an important saving goal for older households. As the age of the head
of the household increases, the percentage of assets represented by the household’s principal
residence decreases, although there is not a discernible pattern to the percentage of wealth that
retirement assets represent.
Congressional Research Service

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1
Types of Retirement Plans and Accounts ......................................................................................... 3
Defined Benefit Pension Plans .................................................................................................. 3
Defined Contribution Pension Plans .......................................................................................... 3
Individual Retirement Accounts ................................................................................................ 3
Household Net Worth in 2010 ......................................................................................................... 4
Assets, Debt, and Net Worth Among Single and Married Households in 2010 .............................. 5
Defined Contribution and IRA Balances Among All Households in 2010 .................................... 11
Percentage of Households with an IRA Balance, DC Plan Balance, or DB Pension in
2010 ............................................................................................................................................ 13
DC and IRA Balances Among Households with DC or IRA Balances in 2010 ............................ 14
Value of a Principal Residence as a Percentage of Total Assets in 2010 ....................................... 15
Home Equity as a Percentage of the Value of the Principal Residence in 2010 ............................ 16
Implications for Policy................................................................................................................... 17

Figures
Figure 1. Net Worth in 2010 Among Single and Married Households ............................................ 5
Figure 2. DC Plan and IRA assets in 2010 Among Single and Married Households .................... 11
Figure 3. Percentage of Households in 2010 with an IRA Balance, DC Account Balance,
or a Defined Benefit Pension ...................................................................................................... 14
Figure 4. DC and IRA Balances in 2010 Among Single and Married Households with DC
or IRA Balances .......................................................................................................................... 15
Figure 5. Value of a Principal Residence in 2010 as a Percentage of Total Assets ........................ 16
Figure 6. Principal Residence Equity as a Percentage of the Value of the Principal
Residence .................................................................................................................................... 17

Tables
Table 1. Median Assets, Debt, Net Worth, and Income Among Single Households in
2010 .............................................................................................................................................. 7
Table 2. Average Assets, Debt, Net Worth, and Income Among Single Households in
2010 .............................................................................................................................................. 8
Table 3. Median Assets, Debt, Net Worth, and Income Among Married Households in
2010 .............................................................................................................................................. 9
Table 4. Average Assets, Debt, Net Worth, and Income Among Married Households in
2010 ............................................................................................................................................ 10
Table 5. Distribution of Retirement Assets Among Households in 2010 ...................................... 12
Congressional Research Service

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010


Appendixes
Appendix. Survey of Consumer Finances ..................................................................................... 19

Contacts
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 20

Congressional Research Service

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Introduction
Americans financially prepare for retirement in a variety of ways: most individuals who work are
eligible for Social Security benefits; about half the workforce is covered by an employer-
sponsored pension; some save for retirement using Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs);
others accumulate non-retirement financial assets, such as stocks, bonds, and mutual funds; and
some accumulate non-financial assets, such as homes or other real estates or business ownerships.
A persistent concern among policymakers is whether households will have sufficient resources to
maintain their pre-retirement standards of living throughout retirement.
A pension plan is a voluntary benefit that some employers provide to their workers. Employers
who offer pension plans for their workers sponsor one or both types: defined benefit (DB)
pension plans or defined contribution (DC) pension plans. In DB pensions, participants receive a
monthly payment in retirement that is based on a formula that typically uses a combination of
length of service, an accrual rate, and an average of final years’ salary. In DC plans, of which
401(k) plans are the most common, workers contribute a percentage of their wages to an
individually established account. Employers may also contribute a match to the DC plan, which is
an additional contribution equal to some or all of the worker’s contribution. The account accrues
investment returns and is then used as a basis for income in retirement. Individuals may be
eligible to make contributions to IRAs if they have earnings from work or by making a rollover
contribution from an employer-sponsored pension.
To encourage American households to save for retirement, Congress has authorized a variety of
tax incentives for both employer-sponsored pensions and IRAs. Among the incentives are (1) an
income tax deduction for employer contributions to DB pension plans; (2) the deferral of income
taxes on employee and employer contributions to employer-sponsored DC retirement accounts;
and (3) a tax deduction for some contributions to IRAs.1 The Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT)
estimated that in FY2013, the U.S. Treasury will forgo $117.2 billion of income as a result of the
exclusion from income of contributions to, and earnings from, pension plans.2 The only larger tax
expenditure in FY2013 is expected to be the exclusion of employer contributions for medical
insurance premiums ($131.7 billion).3 Congress has expressed support for the goal of increasing
U.S. household retirement income security. For example, in the 112th Congress, the Senate passed
resolutions supporting the goals of “National Save for Retirement Week.” 4

1 In DC accounts, employees (and often their employers) place funds in individual employee accounts that are used as
the basis for retirement incomes.
2 See U.S. Congress, Joint Committee on Taxation, Estimate Of Federal Tax Expenditures For Fiscal Years 2012-
2017
, committee print, 113th Cong., 1st sess., February 1, 2013, JCS-1-13 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2013).
3 Some point out that the dollar amount reported by U.S. Treasury and JCT of the tax expenditure for pensions is
overstated because the exclusion from income of contributions to pensions and IRAs is a deferral of taxes that will be
paid in the future. In comparison, the dollar amount of other tax expenditures (such as the exclusion from income of
payments for medical insurance premiums) represents permanent losses to the U.S. Treasury. For more information,
see Peter Brady, The Tax Benefits and Revenue Costs of Tax Deferral, Investment Company Institute, Washington, DC,
September 2012, http://www.ici.org/pdf/ppr_12_tax_benefits.pdf. or Judy Xanthopoulos, Ph.D. and Mary M. Schmitt,
Retirement Savings and Tax Expenditure Estimates, American Society of Pension Professionals & Actuaries,
Arlington, VA, May 2011, http://www.asppa.org/Main-Menu/govtaffairs/RET.aspx.
4 See S.Res. 266 and S.Res. 555. In the 111th Congress, both the House and Senate passed resolutions supporting the
goals of “National Save for Retirement Week.” See H.Res. 662 and S.Res. 649 in the 111th Congress.
Congressional Research Service
1

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

The nature of employer-sponsored pensions has changed over the past 30 years. When the first
major pension legislation (Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 [ERISA; P.L. 93-
406]) was passed, employer-sponsored pensions were mainly DB plans. Since 1974, fewer and
fewer employers have been offering DB pensions, whereas an increasing number of employers
offer DC pensions. Because of this shift, an increasing number of households have greater
responsibility for their economic well-being in retirement.5 This trend will continue for the
foreseeable future, and many households expect to rely on their DC accounts as a source of
income in retirement. For example, among non-retirees surveyed by the Gallup in November
2012, 68% indicated that they expected a 401(k), IRA, or other retirement savings account to be a
major source of income in retirement.6
The amounts that Americans have saved for retirement is an important component of evaluating
the effectiveness of public policies toward retirement income security and understanding how
prepared American households are for retirement. Despite tax incentives to promote saving for
retirement, 57% of Americans surveyed by Gallup in January 2013 reported that they were
worried about outliving their savings after they retire.7 Many factors affect the accumulation of
financial and non-financial assets by American households. Some of these factors include
education; income; the number of children in a household; the amount, if any, of non-measured
wealth, such as future Social Security or DB pension benefits; and tax policy as established by
Congress.8
Households have a variety of choices about where to put their wealth and may have different
reasons for saving. Households that are saving to purchase a home or for their children’s
education might be less likely to consider putting money into a retirement account. The
Congressional Research Service’s (CRS’s) analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances
(SCF) indicated that 29.1% of all U.S. households indicated that saving for retirement is their
most important reason for saving and was the second most important reason for saving for an
additional 9.1% of households.
Although this report examines the amount of wealth (such as financial and retirement assets) that
households own, it does not address the adequacy of these assets to provide financial security in
retirement. A large academic and policy literature addresses the adequacy of current retirement
savings and policies.9

5 For more information on this trend, see Barbara A. Butrica, Howard M. Iams, and Karen E. Smith et al., The
Disappearing Defined Benefit Pension and Its Potential Impact on the Retirement Incomes of Baby Boomers
, Social
Security Bulletin, vol. 69, no. 3, 2009, http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v69n3/v69n3p1.html or CRS Report
RL30122, Pension Sponsorship and Participation: Summary of Recent Trends, by John J. Topoleski.
6 See Gallup, “U.S. Investors Want Gov't to Enhance 401(k) Accounts,” press release, January 23, 2013,
http://www.gallup.com/poll/159614/investors-gov-enhance-401-accounts.aspx.
7 See Gallup, “U.S. Financial Worries Rival Those of 1992,” press release, January 25, 2012, http://www.gallup.com/
poll/152180/Financial-Worries-Rival-1992.aspx.
8 See, for example, Sondra Beverly, Michael Sherraden, and Min Zhan et al., Determinants of Asset Building: A Report
in the Series, Poor Finances: Assets and Low-Income Households,
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (DHHS/ASPE), March 2008, http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/07/
poorfinances/determinants/report.pdf.
9 For example, see Jack VanDerhei, A Post Crisis Assessment of Retirement Income Adequacy for Baby Boomers and
Gen Xers
, Employee Benefit Research Institute, Issue Brief 354, February 2011, http://www.ebri.org/pdf/briefspdf/
IB.Feb11.Post-Crisis_RetIncAd.FinalFlow.pdf. Pablo Antolin, “Private Pensions and the Financial Crisis: How to
Ensure Adequate Retirement Income from DC Pension Plans,” Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD), OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, vol. 2009, issue 2 (2009), http://www.oecd.org/
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
2

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Types of Retirement Plans and Accounts
Congress has authorized a variety of tax incentives to encourage employers and workers to save
for retirement. For example, employer contributions to retirement plans are excluded from the
company’s taxable income and taxes on investment earnings in DC accounts are deferred until
distributed. Some employers sponsor DB or DC pension plans (or both) and individual workers,
regardless of their participation in an employer-sponsored pension plan, may also establish and
contribute to IRAs (although only workers who do not have an employer-sponsored pension or
who have an employer-sponsored pension plan and who have earnings below specified thresholds
receive a tax-deduction for their IRA contributions).
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
In defined benefit (DB) pension plans, participants receive a monthly payment in retirement that
is based on a formula that typically uses a combination of length of service, accrual rate, and
average of final years’ salary. For example, a plan might specify that retirees receive an amount
equal to 1.5% of their pay for each year of service, where the pay is the average of a worker’s
highest five pay years.10
Defined Contribution Pension Plans
In DC plans—of which 401(k) plans, 403(b) plans, 457(b), and the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) are
the most common—workers contribute a percentage of their wages to an individual account
established by the employer.11 Employers may also contribute a match to the DC plan, which is
an additional contribution equal to some or all of the worker’s contribution. The account accrues
investment returns and is then used as a basis for income in retirement.
Individual Retirement Accounts
IRAs are tax-advantaged accounts that individuals (or married couples) can establish to
accumulate funds for retirement. Any individual under the age of 70½ and who has earnings from
work may establish and contribute to an IRA. Individuals may rollover their DC plan assets into

(...continued)
finance/financialmarkets/44628862.pdf. William G. Gale, John Karl Scholz, and Ananth Seshadri, “Are All Americans
Saving ‘Optimally’ for Retirement?,” December 31, 2009, http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~scholz/Research/
Are_All_Americans_v6.pdf. Barbara A. Butrica, Karen E. Smith, and Howard M. Iams, This Is Not Your Parents’
Retirement: Comparing Retirement Income Across Generations
, Social Security Bulletin, vol. 72, no. 1, 2012,
http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v72n1/v72n1p37.html.
10 A worker with 20 years of service in a DB that has accrual rate of 1.5% that is based on an average of the worker’s
highest five years of salary of $50,000 would receive a pension benefit of $50,000 x 20 x .015 = $15,000 per year.
11 Except for the TSP, which is sponsored by the federal government, the plans are named for the section of the Internal
Revenue Code that authorizes the plan. Private-sector employers sponsor 401(k) plans, public school systems and non-
profit organizations sponsor 403(b) plans, and state and local governments sponsor 457(b) plans. For more information,
see http://www.irs.gov/Retirement-Plans/Plan-Sponsor/Types-of-Retirement-Plans-1 or CRS Report R40707, 401(k)
Plans and Retirement Savings: Issues for Congress
, by John J. Topoleski.
Congressional Research Service
3

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

an IRA. A rollover is the transfer of assets from one retirement plan to an IRA upon separation
from the original employer.12
Household Net Worth in 2010
Figure 1 shows the distribution of household net worth in quartiles classified by marital status
and the age of the head of the household.13 Net worth is the broadest wealth measure and is
calculated as the value of household assets minus the value of household debt. Household assets
include financial assets (such as checking accounts, savings accounts, stocks, bonds, mutual
funds, defined contribution retirement accounts, IRAs, and the cash value of life insurance) and
non-financial assets (such as vehicles, housing and other real estate, and businesses). Retirement
assets consist primarily of DC retirement account balances (such as 401(k), 403(b), 457(b)
accounts, and the TSP) and IRAs. Household debt includes, among other debts, credit card debt,
mortgages, installment loans, and loans from DC retirement accounts.14 Data in this report are
from the 2010 SCF, which is a triennial household survey conducted by the Federal Reserve.15
The SCF collects information about the amount of regular payments that households receive (for
example, from Social Security and defined benefit pensions), but it does not include the value of
these payments in household wealth calculations.
In 2010, among married households in which the age of the head of the household was younger
than 35, 25% had net worth less than or equal to $1,170; 50% had net worth less than or equal to
$15,000 (which was the median net worth for this group); and 75% had net worth less than or
equal to $63,900. With the exception of married households in which the head of the household
was 75 years old or older, median net worth in 2010 increased with the age of the head of the
household. Within each age group, median net worth was higher for married households than for
single households.
Figure 1 includes retirement assets as a percentage of net worth. Households in which the head is
aged 55 to 64 had the highest percentages of retirement assets (19.4% for single households and
19.9% for married households). Households in which the head is older than 74 years of age
owned the lowest percentage of retirement assets of any age group (6.9% of single households
and 9.7% of married households). Possible explanations for the low percentage among
households in which the head is older than 74 years include: (1) these households are most likely
to be retired and thus have been drawing down their retirement assets and (2) these households
are more likely to have a DB pension plan, which is a source of income in retirement but is not
measured by the SCF. Households that expect to receive income in retirement from a DB pension
plan may need to save less than households that do not expect to receive DB pension income.

12 More information on IRAs is available in CRS Report RL34397, Traditional and Roth Individual Retirement
Accounts (IRAs): A Primer
, by John J. Topoleski.
13 Quartiles are the three values that divide the data into four equal groups (e.g., 25% of observations are equal to or
less than the first quartile, 50% of the observations are equal to or less than the second quartile, etc.) In this report,
quartile values are for the range of values within each subgroup. Households were grouped between married and single
households, and then grouped into one of six subgroups based on the age of the head of the household. Quartiles are
then reported within each of the 12 subgroups.
14 The net worth of all American households in 2010 was $58.2 trillion.
15 More information about the Survey of Consumer Finances is available in an Appendix.
Congressional Research Service
4






























































































































































U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Figure 1. Net Worth in 2010 Among Single and Married Households
First Quartile, Median, and Third Quartile Amounts by Age of the Head of the Household
$1,000,000
$900,000
15.9%
24.7%
17.4%
19.4%
17.9%
6.9%
17.4%
19.6%
18.2% 19.9%
17.9%
9.7%
$800,000
Percentages represent defined contribution account and
IRA balances as a percentage of household net worth
$700,000
Single Households
Married Households
$600,000
$500,000
$400,000
$300,000
$200,000
$100,000
$0
-$100,000
Younger
Age 35 -
Age 45 -
Age 55 -
Age 65 -
Older
Younger
Age 35 -
Age 45 -
Age 55 -
Age 65 -
Older
Than 35
44
54
64
74
Than 74
Than 35
44
54
64
74
Than 74
1st Quartile
($880)
$110
$4,870
$7,520
$16,400
$26,370
$1,170
$13,200
$42,400
$95,800 $122,850 $124,850
Median
$5,101
$13,960
$43,150
$73,890 $103,400 $151,900 $15,000
$63,730 $181,000 $300,800 $339,300 $295,870
3rd Quartile $28,270
$69,240 $173,900 $238,250 $287,500 $391,900 $63,900 $226,450 $555,200 $971,000 $934,750 $591,500

Source: The Congressional Research Service (CRS) analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF).
Assets, Debt, and Net Worth Among Single and
Married Households in 2010

Table 1 and Table 2 provide, respectively, the median and average values for each of the
components of household net worth among single households. Table 3 and Table 4 provide,
respectively, the median and average values for each of the components of household net worth
among married households. Because a large percentage of households hold relatively small
amounts of financial assets and debt, the distribution of these variables is highly skewed. As a
result, there are large differences between the average and median values of most financial
variables. A few very large observations produce a higher average value for a set of data but do
not affect the median value.16 For example, among married households in which the head of the

16 Means and medians provide different, but useful, information. Median values represent the experience of the middle
(or typical) household. However, medians are not additive. For example, the median value of net worth is not equal to
the median value of assets minus the median value of debt. However, average values are additive: the average value of
net worth is equal to the average value of assets minus the average value of debt. Medians facilitate the understanding
of the ownership of assets and debt among the typical household (e.g., 50% of single households had net worth less
than or equal to $34,300), whereas averages facilitate mathematical computation and therefore comparisons across
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
5

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

household was aged 45 to 54, median net worth (from Table 3) was $181,000 whereas average
net worth (from Table 4) was $769,222.
Ownership of business interests and of non-residential real estate was not widespread among
American households. In 2010, median values for business interests and non-residential real
estate were $0 for all age groups among single and married households. This is an indication that
at least half of the households do not own any of these types of assets.
In 2010, married households had much larger amounts of assets and debt than single households.
Both average and median asset and debt values for every age group were at least twice as large
for married households compared with single households.
Table 1 indicates that at least half of all single households did not own any retirement assets in
2010, as the median assets amounts for each age group is $0. Table 1 and Table 2 also show that
there was a large increase in the median and average amounts of non-retirement financial assets
for single households in which the age of the head of household is 75 or older compared with
single households in which the age of the householder is 65 to 74. Median non-retirement
financial assets increased by 214.5% from $6,200 to $19,500 and average non-retirement
financial assets increased by 96.6% from $90,339 to $177,593.
Among married households in which the head of the household was aged 75 or older, Table 3
shows that median non-retirement financial assets increased by 34.3% (from $28,291 to $38,000)
compared with married households in which the head was aged 65 to 74, though average non-
retirement financial assets declined by 11.0% (from $345,080 to $307,153). The change in
average and median amounts of non-retirement financial assets is not completely explained by
decreases in other assets, such as businesses, as decreases in the amount of these assets were
insufficient to provide a complete explanation.
For all single and married households in which the head was younger than 55 years of age, the
largest component of household assets was the principal residence. However, because many
households had mortgages, mortgage debt was also a large component of households’ financial
situation. For married households in which the head was aged 55 or older, non-retirement
financial assets were the largest component of assets. For all single and married households, the
average amount of non-retirement financial assets was larger than the amount of retirement
assets.

(...continued)
asset and debt categories (e.g., retirement assets were 12.3% of single households’ total assets).
Congressional Research Service
6

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Table 1. Median Assets, Debt, Net Worth, and Income Among Single Households
in 2010
All
Age:
Single
House-
Younger
75 or


holds
than 35
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
Older
Retirement Assets
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Non-Retirement
Financial Assets
$2,700
$1,500
$1,300
$1,650
$5,000
$6,200
$19,500
s Housing
$22,000
$0
$0
$45,000
$75,000
$90,000
$90,000
sset Business Interests
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
A Other Real Estate
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Other Assets
$6,200
$5,300
$6,600
$8,900
$7,100
$6,000
$5,000




Total
$78,050
$13,700 $50,070 $102,310 $124,000 $131,560 $174,000








t Mortgages
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Deb Non-mortgage debt
$680
$3,600
$3,700
$1,900
$710
$0
$0
Total
$5,500
$6,500 $19,750 $12,000 $11,000
$1,120
$0

rth
o

Net W Assets - Debt
$34,300
$5,101
$13,960
$43,150
$73,890 $103,400 $151,900

me
o
Inc
Income in 2009
$28,462
$24,396
$35,578
$33,545
$31,512
$25,413
$21,143
Source: The Congressional Research Service (CRS) analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF).
Notes: Retirement assets include defined contribution and Individual Retirement Account (IRA) balances. Non-
retirement financial assets include checking, saving, and brokerage accounts. Housing is the value of the
household’s principal residence. Business interests are the value of any business interests such privately held
businesses, farms, professional practices, limited partnerships, private equity, or other business investments that
are not publicly traded. Other real estate is the value of residential real estate excluding the principal residence
and the value of commercial real estate. Other assets include vehicles, jewelry, metals, or collectables. Mortgages
include mortgages, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit. Non-mortgage debt includes credit card
debt, installment loans, and loans against pensions.
Congressional Research Service
7

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Table 2. Average Assets, Debt, Net Worth, and Income Among Single Households
in 2010
All
Age:
Single
House-
Younger
75 or


holds
than 35
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
Older
Retirement
Assets
$33,585
$6,225 $19,351 $35,986 $60,908 $68,716 $30,265
Non-Retirement
Financial
Assets
$71,765
$14,848 $25,657 $64,329 $95,091 $90,339 $177,593
s
Housing

$100,694
$37,667 $75,210 $116,925 $120,409 $147,144 $148,363
sset
Business
Interests
$22,734
$8,382 $9,677 $29,080 $41,442 $31,705 $23,157
A
Other Real Estate
$30,713
$5,390
$7,702
$23,237
$40,199
$62,375
$68,253
Other
Assets

$13,522
$9,387 $10,486 $16,219 $14,568 $22,898 $11,487
Total
$273,012 $81,899 $148,083 $285,777 $372,617 $423,176 $459,119









t
Mortgages

$37,821
$27,603 $51,273 $58,406 $44,757 $28,514 $14,300
Non-mortgage
Deb
debt

$14,459
$15,264 $18,373 $20,818 $13,838 $10,043 $5,578

Total
$52,281
$42,867 $69,645 $79,224 $58,595 $38,557 $19,878

rth
o

Net W
Assets - Debt
$220,732
$39,032
$78,438
$206,552
$314,022
$384,619
$439,241

me
o
Inc

Income in 2009
$40,454
$31,592
$44,660
$48,540
$48,676
$37,712
$32,998
Source: CRS analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances.
Notes: Retirement assets include defined contribution and Individual Retirement Account (IRA) balances. Non-
retirement financial assets include checking, saving, and brokerage accounts. Housing is the value of the
household’s principal residence. Business interests are the value of any business interests such privately held
businesses, farms, professional practices, limited partnerships, private equity, or other business investments that
are not publicly traded. Other real estate is the value of residential real estate excluding the principal residence
and the value of commercial real estate. Other assets include vehicles, jewelry, metals, or collectables. Mortgages
include mortgages, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit. Non-mortgage debt includes credit card
debt, installment loans, and loans against pensions.
Congressional Research Service
8

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Table 3. Median Assets, Debt, Net Worth, and Income Among Married Households
in 2010
All
Age:
Married
House-
Younger
75 or


holds
than 35
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
Older
Retirement Assets
$10,000
$0
$7,000
$26,000
$42,000
$24,000
$0
Non-Retirement
Financial Assets
$9,000
$3,300
$5,000
$10,310
$18,800
$28,291
$38,000
s Housing
$145,000
$0 $134,000 $175,000 $187,000 $170,000 $155,000
sset Business Interests
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
A Other Real Estate
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Other Assets
$20,300
$13,700
$20,800
$23,100
$24,900
$20,700
$13,900






Total
$257,100 $80,080 $214,100 $324,100 $408,200 $390,700 $321,400









t Mortgages
$38,000
$0
$89,000
$72,000
$40,000
$0
$0
Non-mortgage
Deb debt
$7,100
$10,050
$13,000
$9,800
$6,900
$1,000
$0


Total
$61,000 $37,200 $116,500
$95,090 $70,000 $21,000
$0

rth
o

Net W Assets - Debt
$129,100
$15,000
$63,730 $181,000 $300,800 $339,300 $295,870

me
o
Inc
Income in 2009
$65,057
$50,825
$71,156
$80,304
$76,238
$59,974
$39,644
Source: CRS analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances.
Notes: Age refers to age of the head of the household. Retirement assets include defined contribution and
Individual Retirement Account (IRA) balances. Non-retirement financial assets include checking, saving, and
brokerage accounts. Housing is the value of the household’s principal residence. Business interests are the value
of any business interests such privately held businesses, farms, professional practices, limited partnerships, private
equity, or other business investments that are not publicly traded. Other real estate is the value of residential
real estate excluding the principal residence and the value of commercial real estate. Other assets include
vehicles, jewelry, metals, or col ectables. Mortgages include mortgages, home equity loans, and home equity lines
of credit. Non-mortgage debt includes credit card debt, installment loans, and loans against pensions.
Congressional Research Service
9

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Table 4. Average Assets, Debt, Net Worth, and Income Among Married Households
in 2010
All
Age:
Married
House-
Younger
75 or


holds
than 35
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
Older
Retirement
Assets

$123,968

$15,246 $57,915 $140,118
$250,544 $210,825 $93,637
Non-Retirement
Financial Assets

$185,815

$17,712 $78,616 $185,030
$332,296 $345,080 $307,153
ts Housing
$229,611
$86,708
$195,072
$278,242
$318,513
$279,546
$246,687
sse
A
Business Interests

$161,804

$31,869 $70,733 $215,326
$271,607 $237,483 $190,721
Other Real Estate

$91,685

$10,557 $30,215 $89,364 $186,510 $160,603 $136,961
Other Assets

$30,396

$18,700 $25,094 $33,472 $43,525 $37,093 $23,485
$1,402,99
$1,270,63
Total
$823,280 $180,792 $457,646 $941,552 4
0 $998,643








t Mortgages
$97,378
$67,317
$131,713
$128,638
$102,067
$65,090
$25,971
Non-mortgage
Deb debt

$33,011

$25,623 $31,113 $43,692 $40,016 $30,012 $12,106
Total
$130,388
$92,940
$162,826
$172,330
$142,084
$95,101
$38,077

rth
o

Net W Assets - Debt

$692,891
$87,851 $294,820 $769,222
$1,260,910
$1,175,528 $960,566

me
o
Inc
Income in 2009
$105,683
$61,676
$101,416
$131,308
$143,916
$103,153
$63,595
Source: CRS analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances.
Notes: Retirement assets include defined contribution and Individual Retirement Account (IRA) balances. Non-
retirement financial assets include checking, saving, and brokerage accounts. Housing is the value of the
household’s principal residence. Business interests are the value of any business interests such privately held
businesses, farms, professional practices, limited partnerships, private equity, or other business investments that
are not publicly traded. Other real estate is the value of residential real estate excluding the principal residence
and the value of commercial real estate. Other assets include vehicles, jewelry, metals, or collectables. Mortgages
include mortgages, home equity loans, and home equity lines of credit. Non-mortgage debt includes credit card
debt, installment loans, and loans against pensions.




Congressional Research Service
10


U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Defined Contribution and IRA Balances Among All
Households in 2010

Figure 2 shows the distribution of retirement assets for single and married households in
quartiles, classified by the age of the head of the household. Retirement assets are defined as the
value of DC accounts and the value of IRAs. Most households had small amounts in their DC
plans or IRAs. A majority of single households in each age group had no retirement assets in
2010. Compared with single households, a greater percentage of married households in each age
group had retirement assets. The data do not include estimates of the value of future defined
benefit or Social Security payments, which might affect how households prepare financially for
retirement. Younger households are less likely than older households to be covered by DB
pension plans and so may need to prepare for retirement differently than previous generations.
Figure 2 also includes the percentage of households within each age group that had either DC or
IRA assets. The percentage of households with retirement assets increased as the age of the head
of the household increased from under 35 years old to 55 to 64 years old. The percentage declined
for households in which the head was aged 65 to 74 and for households aged 75 or older. Among
single households, within each age group, at least half of the households did not have any
retirement assets. Among married households, 70.6% of households in which the head was aged
55 to 64 have retirement assets, the highest percentage of any group in Figure 2.
Figure 2. DC Plan and IRA assets in 2010 Among Single and Married Households
First Quartile, Median, and Third Quartile Amounts by Age of the Head of the Household

Source: CRS analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances.
Congressional Research Service
11

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Table 5 provides the distribution of retirement assets among the 117.6 million U.S. households in
2010. Slightly more than half (50.4%) of U.S. households had retirement assets in 2010. Among
households that had retirement assets in 2010, 53.2% had $50,000 or less and 67.3% had
$100,000 or less. Approximately 1.5% of all U.S. households (3.0% of households with
retirement assets) had retirement assets greater than $1 million in 2010.
Table 5. Distribution of Retirement Assets Among Households in 2010
Percentage of
Amount of Retirement
Percentage of All
Households With
Assets
Number of Households
Households
Retirement Assets
$0 58,363,198
49.6%
-
Greater than $0 and less
31,527,732 26.8%
53.2%
than or equal to $50,000
Greater than $50,000 and
less than or equal to
8,325,406 7.1% 14.1%
$100,000
Greater than $100,000 and
less than or equal to
14,690,016 12.5%
24.8%
$500,000
Greater than $500,000 and
less than or equal to
2,919,566 2.5%
4.9%
$1,000,000
Greater than $1,000,000
and less than or equal to
950,452 0.8%
1.6%
$1,500,000
Greater than $1,500,000
and less than or equal to
658,961 0.6%
1.1%
$3,000,000
Greater than $3,000,000
173,886
0.1%
0.3%
Source: CRS analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances.
Notes: Retirement assets include defined contribution (DC) and Individual Retirement Account (IRA) balances.
Percentages may not add up to 100% due to rounding.
The Obama Administration’s FY2014 budget has proposed prohibiting contributions to retirement
accounts if the sum of the taxpayer’s DC and IRA accounts is greater than the amount needed to
fund an annuity equal to the maximum benefit allowed in a DB pension plan. Under 26 U.S.C.
Section 415(b)(1)(A), the maximum benefit allowed from a DB plan is $205,000 in 2013.17 The
proposed FY2014 budget estimates that the amount of DC plan assets needed to fund an annuity
equal to $205,000 would be approximately $3.4 million.18 The maximum could decrease or
increase as interest rates increase or decrease respectively.19 The administration has not indicated

17 See Internal Revenue Service, “IR-2012-77:IRS Announces 2013 Pension Plan Limitations; Taxpayers May
Contribute Up to $17,500 to Their 401(k) Plans in 2013,” press release, October 18, 2012, http://www.irs.gov/uac/
2013-Pension-Plan-Limitations.
18 See Office of Management and Budget, Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal
Year 2014
, Washington, DC, April 2013, p. 201, http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2014/
assets/spec.pdf.
19 The dollar amount needed to purchase a given annuity amount is inversely related to prevailing interest rates. Given
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
12

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

if an individual’s participation in a DB plan would affect an individual’s maximum account
balance. For example, individuals who expect to receive DB pensions in retirement from their
current or past job would need less than the currently proposed $3.4 million account balance to
receive $205,000 per year in retirement income if the DB pension amount were to offset the
$205,000 maximum benefit. This could be administratively difficult to implement, however,
because each person with a DB pension would have a different maximum DC account limit. In
addition, for individuals who expect to receive DB pension benefits, their maximum DC account
limits could change each year as they accrue benefits in the DB plan for which they are eligible.
Percentage of Households with an IRA Balance, DC
Plan Balance, or DB Pension in 2010

Figure 3 shows the percentage of households that in 2010 had DB plans, DC plans, and IRAs.
For a given age of the head of household, married households were more likely than single
households to have had a retirement plan or a retirement account.
Older households were more likely to have had a DB pension, which is consistent with other
evidence that shows a decline in DB pension plan coverage and an increase in DC pension plan
coverage over the past 20 years.20
The “hump-shaped” pattern of the percentage of households that had DC assets and IRA assets
shows that ownership of retirement accounts initially increased as the age of the head of the
household increased but then declined as the head of the household became older. This pattern is
consistent with the evidence of a shift from DB to DC pension plans, as older households were
less likely to have been offered a DC pension plan in their working careers. In comparing DC and
IRA ownership, younger households were more likely to have had a DC pension whereas older
households were more likely to have an IRA. One likely explanation is that as individuals retired,
they made rollovers of the account balances of their DC plans into IRAs.21

(...continued)
that current interest rates are at historically low levels, increases in interest rates would lower the amount needed to
fund a given annuity amount. The Administration’s proposal does not indicate whether the maximum dollar amount
allowed in retirement accounts would increase or decrease with interest rate changes. For example, the Employee
Benefit Research Institute (EBRI) has indicated that in 2006, the maximum retirement account amount would have
been $2.2 million. See Employee Benefit Research Institute, “FY 2014 Obama Budget Proposal (Updated):The Impact
of a Retirement Savings Account Cap,” press release, April 12, 2013, http://www.ebri.org/pdf/PR-
1019.Advise2.12Apr13.RetCap-Update1.pdf.
20 See, for example, Barbara A. Butrica, Karen Elizabeth Smith, and Eric Toder et al., The Disappearing Defined
Benefit Pension and its Potential Impact on the Retirement Incomes of Boomers
, Center of Retirement Research, 2009-
2, January 2009, http://crr.bc.edu/working-papers/the-disappearing-defined-benefit-pension-and-its-potential-impact-
on-the-retirement-incomes-of-boomers/.
21 The rollovers can be voluntary or involuntary. When a worker who participates in a DC plan leaves the employer
who sponsored the plan, the worker may be allowed to or, in some cases, required to withdraw their DC plan account
balance. For information on distribution rules from 401(k) plans, see http://www.irs.gov/Retirement-Plans/Plan-
Participant,-Employee/401%28k%29-Resource-Guide—Plan-Participants—General-Distribution-Rules.
Congressional Research Service
13






U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Figure 3. Percentage of Households in 2010 with an IRA Balance, DC Account
Balance, or a Defined Benefit Pension
70.0%
Single Households
Married Households
60.0%
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
age: less
age: 35 -
age: 45 -
age: 55 -
age: 65 -
age: less
age: 35 -
age: 45 -
age: 55 -
age: 65 -
age: 75+
age: 75+
than 35
44
54
64
74
than 35
44
54
64
74
IRA
10.3%
13.9%
19.9%
30.3%
25.6%
22.0%
17.1%
25.8%
33.5%
48.8%
50.1%
43.5%
DC
24.0%
30.4%
29.5%
21.1%
3.0%
0.8%
39.6%
49.5%
52.7%
43.3%
16.4%
3.5%
DB
7.8%
14.2%
21.4%
32.0%
42.0%
52.9%
16.6%
22.6%
32.8%
46.0%
49.9%
62.4%

Source: CRS analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances.
Notes: Percentages represent percentages of households that had the type of plan at the time of the survey.
Households may have had more than one type of plan.
DC and IRA Balances Among Households with DC
or IRA Balances in 2010

Among households that had retirement assets, Figure 4 shows the quartiles of retirement wealth.
With the exception of married households in which the head was aged 75 or older, as the age of
the head of the household increased, median retirement wealth increased for both single and
married households. Among households in which the head was aged 55 to 64, the median amount
of retirement assets in 2010 was $48,000 for single households and $132,000 for married
households. Two factors might have limited the amount of retirement assets among households in
which the head was aged 65 or older. First, these households might have been retired and thus had
stopped accumulating assets (and spent down some of their savings). Second, these households
were more likely to have had a DB pension plan at their place of employment and may have been
less likely to have accumulated assets in a DC plan or in an IRA.
Congressional Research Service
14






U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Figure 4. DC and IRA Balances in 2010 Among Single and Married Households with
DC or IRA Balances
First Quartile, Median, and Third Quartile Amounts by Age of the Head of the Household
$450,000
$400,000
$350,000
Single Households
Married Households
$300,000
$250,000
$200,000
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
age: less age: 35 - age: 45 - age: 55 - age: 65 -
age: less age: 35 - age: 45 - age: 55 - age: 65 -
age: 75+
age: 75+
than 35
44
54
64
74
than 35
44
54
64
74
1st Quartile
$2,500
$8,000
$10,000
$11,000
$16,000
$13,000
$3,500
$13,000
$25,000
$34,000
$33,000
$21,000
Median
$8,500
$23,000
$29,000
$45,000
$48,000
$53,000
$13,000
$36,000
$80,000 $132,000 $138,000 $55,000
3rd Quartile $22,000
$54,000
$75,000 $150,000 $165,000 $132,000 $35,000 $115,000 $239,000 $385,000 $401,000 $157,000

Source: CRS analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances.
Value of a Principal Residence as a Percentage of
Total Assets in 2010

A principal residence (the place where the household lives most of the time) was the largest single
asset that most households own, and some households use the value of their residence as a source
of income in retirement.22 For example, a household with home equity could borrow against the
equity of the residence; take out a Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM), also known as a
reverse mortgage; or sell their residence. Figure 5 shows the value of households’ principal
residences in 2010 as a percentage of households’ total assets. At each age group, single
households had slightly higher percentages than married households. Except for households in
which the head of the household was aged 75 or older, the percentage of housing as a percentage
of total assets generally declined as the age of the head of the household increased. Households

22 See, for example, James M. Poterba, Steven F. Venti, and David A. Wise, The Composition and Draw-down of
Wealth in Retirement
, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper no. 17536, October 2011,
http://www.nber.org/papers/w17536.
Congressional Research Service
15



U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

likely accumulated non-housing assets as they became older. Households that owned their homes
in 2010 also likely had mortgage debt.
Figure 5. Value of a Principal Residence in 2010 as a Percentage of Total Assets
60.00%
Single Households
Married Households
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Age: less Age: 35 - Age: 45 - Age: 55 - Age: 65 -
Age: less Age: 35 - Age: 45 - Age: 55 - Age: 65 -
Age: 75+
Age: 75+
than 35
44
54
64
74
than 35
44
54
64
74
49.50%
46.90%
36.20%
26.90%
25.40%
27.20%
46.30%
40.80%
28.40%
21.30%
20.10%
20.10%

Source: CRS analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances.
Home Equity as a Percentage of the Value of the
Principal Residence in 2010

To emphasize the role of home equity in the financial well-being of households, Figure 6 shows
that in 2010 the value of home equity (value of the principal residence minus the value of debt
outstanding against the residence) increased with the age of the head of the household. As
households pay their mortgages (assuming that the market value of the residence increases or
does not fall by more than amount of principal payments on the mortgage), the value of equity in
the principal residence increases. Single and married households had similar patterns: the
percentages in 2010 increased from about 20% for households in which the head was younger
than 35 years of age to more than 90% for households in which the age of the head was 75 or
older.
Congressional Research Service
16



U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Figure 6. Principal Residence Equity as a Percentage of the Value of the
Principal Residence
100.00%
Single Households
Married Households
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
Age: less Age: 35 - Age: 45 - Age: 55 - Age: 65 -
Age: less Age: 35 - Age: 45 - Age: 55 - Age: 65 -
Age: 75+
Age: 75+
than 35
44
54
64
74
than 35
44
54
64
74
21.10%
33.40%
45.30%
60.80%
79.70%
92.80%
19.00%
32.10%
54.70%
69.70%
79.80%
90.30%

Source: CRS analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances.
Implications for Policy
Analysis of the 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) indicates that U.S. households owned
$10.1 trillion in retirement assets (such as in 401(k) and 403(b) accounts and IRAs), which was
14.5% of all U.S. household assets in 2010. Across all age groups, because 49.6% of households
did not have any retirement assets in 2010, the median amount of retirement assets in 2010 was
$190; among the 50.4% of households that had retirement assets in 2010, the median amount of
retirement assets was $44,000.
Although the report does not address whether households have sufficient resources from which to
ensure an adequate standard of living in retirement, the data in this report highlight the
importance of understanding the context in which decisions about saving for retirement occur.
Some of the factors that might affect the accumulation of retirement assets include demographic
characteristics of the household (e.g., age of the head of the household, marital status, number of
children, if any); the financial situation of the household (e.g., ownership of other assets and the
amount and type of household debt); and the employment situation of the household (e.g.,
Congressional Research Service
17

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

whether employed, the worker’s participation in other retirement plans, and the amount of Social
Security benefits the household expects to receive).23
Table 2 and Table 4 indicate that for households in which the head was younger than 65 years
old, the average amount of most assets (including retirement assets) generally increased in 2010
as the age of the head of the household increased. Figure 1 shows that there was not a clear
pattern in the percentage of wealth that retirement assets represented in 2010: the percentages
neither increased nor decreased consistently as the age of the household increased.
Table 2 and Table 4 show that the average amount of retirement assets was generally higher for
households in which the head of the household was closer to retirement age (age 55 to 64) than
for households in which the head was younger than 55. Younger households have had fewer years
in which to save and may prefer to save for needs other than retirement (such as the purchase of a
home, unexpected events, or a child’s education). Table 2 and Table 4 also indicate that
households in which the head of the household was aged 75 or older had fewer retirement assets
in 2010 than households in which the head of the household was aged 55 to 64. These households
(1) may have already made some withdrawals from their retirement accounts prior to the age of
75 or (2) were more likely to have income from a DB pension plan and thus may have had less
need to rely on a DC pension or an IRA as a source of income in retirement. Figure 3 indicates
that in 2010 households in which the head was younger than 55 years old were more likely to
have a DC plan than an IRA or a DB plan.
In addition, household accumulation of retirement assets might be affected by ownership of other
assets, such as businesses or real estate. Although relatively few households own business
interests, the SCF indicates that 67.3% of households owned their principal residence. Whether
households use assets such as businesses or real estate as a source of income in retirement might
depend on several factors, such as a desire to remain in a home or a wish to leave a bequest.
Analysis of the 2010 SCF showed that among households with children, 9.7% indicated that
saving for their children or their estate was more important than saving for retirement.

23 Most households participate in Social Security though some do not. For example, most federal civilian employees
hired before 1984 and some state and local government workers are not covered by Social Security. Social Security
coverage of state and local government workers varies by state.
Congressional Research Service
18

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Appendix. Survey of Consumer Finances
For the data used in this report, The Congressional Research Service (CRS) examined the 2010
Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF). The SCF is a triennial survey conducted on behalf of the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. It contains detailed information on U.S. household
finances, such as the amount and types of assets owned, the amount and types of debt owed, and
detailed demographic information on the head of the household and spouse. Because many
financial decisions are made jointly by the head of the household and spouse, the household is the
unit of analysis in the SCF. For the purposes of the SCF, a household consists of the head of the
household, a spouse or partner, and any dependent children.24
Wealth, as reported in the SCF, includes measurable financial wealth (such as bank accounts,
stocks, and mutual funds) and measurable non-financial wealth (such as the value of real estate
and businesses that households own). The data do not estimate wealth from Social Security and
other annuities, which are important sources of income for many older households in retirement.
Most households receive or will receive Social Security benefits and some households receive or
will receive benefits from a defined benefit (DB) pension plan. Although this report does not
estimate the value of wealth from Social Security or DB pensions, the presence of these
annuitized sources of income in retirement may affect an individual’s financial decisions while
working.25
The SCF consists of a sample of 6,492 households and is weighted so as to be representative of
the population of 117.6 million U.S. households, of which 41.9% were single and 58.1% were
married. The SCF oversamples wealthy households to ensure that the survey accurately portrays
the ownership of assets in the United States. The Federal Reserve makes efforts to ensure that the
data are of the highest possible quality and to minimize the errors that are common to household
surveys, such as respondents not understanding their own finances.26
Data in this report are reported for all households in the United States and are not limited to
working households. Retirement income adequacy is an important concern for both working and
non-working households. In addition, many non-working households own retirement assets as a
result of participation in a retirement plan while employed or as a result of ownership of an
Individual Retirement Account (IRA). Future analysis may examine subsets of the population
(such as only households in which at least the head of the household or spouse is working).



24 In the SCF, the head of the household is the individual in a single household, the male in a mixed-sex couple, or the
older individual in the case of a same-sex couple. The SCF Codebook indicates that “no judgment about the internal
organization of the households is implied by this organization of the data” and that the “term is euphemistic and merely
reflects the systematic way in which the data set has been organized.” More information is available in the 2010 SCF
Codebook, available at http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/scf_2010documentation.htm.
25 For example, the Social Security benefit formula is progressive, which means that the ratio of Social Security
benefits to pre-retirement wages decreases as pre-retirement wages increase. See CRS Report R42035, Social Security
Primer
, by Dawn Nuschler. One implication is that households with lower earnings need fewer assets from which to
replace pre-retirement income.
26 See Arthur B. Kennickell, Look and Listen, But Don’t Stop: Interviewers and Data Quality in the 2007 SCF, Federal
Reserve Board, Washington, DC, October 2008, http://www.federalreserve.gov/econresdata/scf/files/asa20072.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
19

U.S. Household Savings for Retirement in 2010

Author Contact Information

John J. Topoleski

Analyst in Income Security
jtopoleski@crs.loc.gov, 7-2290


Congressional Research Service
20