.
Senate Conferees: Their Selection and
Authority
Elizabeth Rybicki
Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process
April 30, 2013
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
98-380
CRS Report for Congress
Pr
epared for Members and Committees of Congress
.
Senate Conferees: Their Selection and Authority
onference committees often prepare the final versions of the most important bills that
Congress approves. Who the conferees are and what decisions they can make, therefore,
C can have an important effect on the outcome of the legislative process. This report
describes the selection and authority of Senate conferees.
Selection of Senate Conferees
The Senate almost always agrees by unanimous consent that the presiding officer be authorized to
appoint the Senate’s conferees. At the start of the 113th Congress (2013-2014), the Senate altered
the procedures that had effectively required the consent of all Senators to send a measure to a
conference committee with the House. This change is not expected to significantly affect the
manner in which conferees are appointed: the Senate will likely continue to authorize the
presiding officer to do so. Due to the rules change, however, unanimous consent to grant the
presiding officer the power to appoint conferees will not be required. The presiding officer could
instead be authorized to appoint as part of a debatable motion to send a measure to conference.
Furthermore, with the support of three-fifths of the Senate, this authorization could be granted
quickly, because the new rule accelerates the cloture process on the motion.1
Although the Senate authorizes the presiding officer to name conferees, the presiding officer
actually exercises no discretion. Instead, he or she presents to the Senate a list that usually has
been prepared by the chair and ranking minority Member of the standing committee with
jurisdiction over the bill. Usually also, the Senate conferees are drawn exclusively from the
membership of that committee. The committee chair, in consultation with the ranking Member,
normally decides on the number of Senators from each party who will serve on the conference
committee. The chair selects the majority party conferees, and the ranking minority Member
selects a proportional number of conferees from among his or her committee colleagues.
Committee seniority is an important but not controlling factor in the selection of committee
members to serve on the conference.
In some cases, the party leaders also become involved in the selection of conferees. For example,
when two or more committees considered the same bill and will be represented on the conference
committee, the party leaders may participate in deciding how many members from each
committee will be appointed as conferees. Also in such cases, Senators may be appointed as
conferees for limited purposes. In the case of a budget reconciliation bill, for example, members
of the Budget Committee may be appointed as conferees for the entire bill while members of
other Senate committees are appointed as conferees only to consider provisions of the bill that are
within their respective jurisdictions.
1 The new rule also appears to allow the Senate to directly appoint conferees by stating that one portion of the motion to
authorize a conference could be “a motion to appoint conferees.” Appointing conferees by motion, instead of
authorizing the presiding officer to do so, has not been the practice of the Senate previously, and it is not clear that the
new motion would normally be used for this purpose. For more information on the rules change, see CRS Report
R42996, Changes to Senate Procedures in the 113th Congress Affecting the Operation of Cloture (S.Res. 15 and S.Res.
16), by Elizabeth Rybicki.
Congressional Research Service
1
.
Senate Conferees: Their Selection and Authority
Authority of Senate Conferees
The rules of the House and Senate impose much the same restrictions on the kinds of decisions
that their conferees may reach. However, the Senate’s precedents give its conferees considerably
more discretion than their House counterparts.
Senate conferees are to limit themselves to the matters that are in disagreement with the House,
and they are to resolve each such matter within the scope of the differences between the House
and Senate positions. Paragraph 2 of Rule XXVIII states in part that the Senate’s conferees “shall
not insert in their report matter not committed to them by either House, nor shall they strike from
the bill matter agreed to by both Houses.” When the conferees are considering a bill from one
house that the other house has passed with a single amendment in the nature of a substitute, the
conferees write their own version of the bill in conference. However, Rule XXVIII also states that
this conference version may not include “matter not committed to them,” but that it may include
“matter which is a germane modification of subjects in disagreement.” The Senate appears to take
a commonsense approach to deciding whether new matter is sufficiently relevant to constitute a
germane modification of subjects in disagreement.
If a point of order is sustained against a conference report on the grounds that it violates the
prohibition of “new matter,” the matter is stricken from the conference recommendation and the
Senate considers a motion that it proposes to send to the House, in place of the original
conference agreement, a proposal consisting of the conference agreement minus the “new matter”
that was stricken. The terms for consideration of this motion are the same as those that would
have applied to the conference report. If the Senate agrees to the motion, the text, in the form of
an amendment between the houses, is sent to the House, and the House then has an opportunity to
act on the amendment. The Senate can waive points of order raised under Rule XXVIII with a
three-fifths vote of Senators duly chosen and sworn (60 Senators assuming no vacancies).
Senate conferees are also precluded by Paragraph 8 of Rule XLIV from including in a conference
report “new directed spending provisions,” or provisions that provide specific items of
appropriations or direct spending that were not committed to the conference committee in either
the House or Senate versions of the legislation. This point of order is disposed of with the same
procedure just described for Rule XXVIII, and this rule also can be waived by a three-fifths vote
of Senators duly chosen and sworn.
Senate conferees must also bear in mind that there are significant restrictions on the agreements
that House conferees can accept without violating their authority. However, the House can choose
not to enforce these restrictions as they apply to a particular conference report. Before the House
begins floor consideration of that report, the House Rules Committee can report, and the House
can adopt, a resolution waiving all points of order against the conference report and against its
consideration.2
2 For additional information on the authority and selection of Senate conferees, see Senate Rule XXVIII; Riddick’s
Senate Procedure, pp. 449-493; CRS Report RS22733, Senate Rules Restricting the Content of Conference Reports, by
Elizabeth Rybicki; and CRS Report 98-696, Resolving Legislative Differences in Congress: Conference Committees
and Amendments Between the Houses, by Elizabeth Rybicki.
Congressional Research Service
2
.
Senate Conferees: Their Selection and Authority
Author Contact Information
Elizabeth Rybicki
Specialist on Congress and the Legislative Process
erybicki@crs.loc.gov, 7-0644
Acknowledgments
This report was written by Stanley Bach, a former Senior Specialist in the Legislative Process. The listed
author updated the report to reflect Senate rules changes in the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and the 113th
Congress (2013-2014), and she is available to answer questions concerning the contents of this report.
Congressional Research Service
3