Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical 
Diseases (NTDs): U.S. and Global Efforts 
from FY2006 to FY2013 
Tiaji Salaam-Blyther 
Specialist in Global Health 
January 22, 2013 
Congressional Research Service 
7-5700 
www.crs.gov 
R42931 
CRS Report for Congress
Pr
  epared for Members and Committees of Congress        
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Summary 
The term “neglected tropical diseases” (NTDs) was coined by the World Health Organization 
(WHO) in 2003 to describe a set of diseases that are ancient, worsen poverty, and typically impair 
health and productivity while carrying low death rates. Some NTDs are easily treatable; others 
are not. While the use of the term “NTDs” has helped to raise awareness about these long-
standing health challenges, its use risks simplifying a complicated health challenge. Health 
interventions to address the array of NTDs vary, but a common factor to an enduring solution to 
these illnesses is economic development. Industrialized countries, including the United States, 
have controlled these diseases in their territories by combining drug treatment with the 
construction and use of improved sanitation, modernization of agricultural practices, and 
utilization of improved water systems. Neglected tropical diseases are diseases that primarily 
plague the poorest people in developing countries. Changes in the environment and population 
flows, however, make industrialized countries, including the United States, increasingly 
vulnerable to some NTDs, particularly dengue haemorrhagic fever, for which there is no cure.  
Congressional interest in NTDs has been growing. Appropriations for NTD programs have 
steadily increased from $15 million in FY2006 to $89 million in FY2012. The Administration 
requested $67 million to support NTD programs in FY2013. In addition to raising spending for 
NTDs, Congress has taken other actions to demonstrate support for tackling NTDs. In October 
2009, for example, the House Malaria Caucus expanded its purview to include NTDs. The Senate 
Malaria Caucus did the same in September 2012.  
The international community has made substantial progress in combating select NTDs, though 
some have been tackled more effectively than others. Guinea worm disease, for example, is on 
the cusp of eradication. More generally, expanding access to mass drug administration is 
contributing to decreases in prevalence of several NTDs, particularly across Latin America. 
Despite these advances, WHO cautions that these diseases cannot be banished without improving 
global access to clean water and sanitation, strengthening local health capacity (veterinary as well 
as human), and intensifying case detection and management. Making improvements in these areas 
will require long-term investments that are complex and may entail facing thorny issues such as 
addressing corruption, transferring ownership of health programs from donors to recipient 
countries, and evaluating the impact of political and economic policies on health programs (e.g., 
international lending requirements). 
The United States has played an important role in combating NTDs, and President Barack Obama 
has prioritized tackling NTDs. Recommendations for congressional action may largely reflect 
broader arguments about congressional engagement in improving global health. Analysts who 
support congressional directives that set programmatic targets, outline the types of activities to be 
implemented in U.S. global health programs, and mandate reporting requirements would probably 
argue for the 113th Congress to take similar steps. Observers who maintain that these steps make 
U.S. global health programs less effective by minimizing the capacity of implementing agencies 
to adapt global health programs to local conditions would likely argue for limiting congressional 
support for combating NTDs to appropriating sufficient resources. This report discusses the 
prevalence of NTDs, U.S. and global actions to address them, and options the 113th Congress 
might consider. For additional background on NTDs, including photographs and discussions 
about transmission of NTDs, descriptions of activities to combat NTDs by other agencies, and 
additional policy issues, see CRS Report R41607, Neglected Tropical Diseases: Background, 
Responses, and Issues for Congress, by Tiaji Salaam-Blyther. 
Congressional Research Service 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Contents 
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 
Global Progress in Combating NTDs .............................................................................................. 3 
Global Actions in 2012 .............................................................................................................. 5 
The London Declaration on Neglected Tropical Diseases .................................................. 6 
U.S. Efforts to Tackle NTDs ............................................................................................................ 7 
FY2013 Funding ........................................................................................................................ 9 
Issues for Congress .......................................................................................................................... 9 
Accessing Clean Water and Sanitation .................................................................................... 10 
Integrating the U.S. NTD Program .......................................................................................... 11 
Strengthening Health Systems ................................................................................................. 13 
Sustaining Advancements ........................................................................................................ 14 
 
Figures 
Figure 1. Global NTD Burden Map ................................................................................................. 1 
Figure 2. Estimated Prevalence of Seven Most Common NTDs ..................................................... 2 
Figure 3. Global Guinea Worm Disease Cases: 1989-2010 ............................................................. 3 
Figure 4. Global Sleeping Sickness Cases: 1990-2010 ................................................................... 4 
Figure 5. Global Access to Drugs for Seven Most Common NTDs: 2005-2009 ............................. 5 
Figure 6. Global Progress on 2020 Goals ........................................................................................ 7 
Figure 7. NTD Treatments Administered in USAID Programs: FY2007-FY2012 ......................... 9 
Figure 8. USAID Spending on the NTD Program: FY2006-FY2012 ............................................. 9 
Figure B-1. NTD Program Countries ............................................................................................ 19 
 
Tables 
Table 1. 17 Neglected Tropical Diseases ......................................................................................... 2 
Table 2. Annual Per Patient Cost of Treating Key Infectious Diseases Globally ............................ 3 
Table A-1. London Declaration: Table of Donor Commitments ....................................................  16 
 
Appendixes 
Appendix A. London Declaration: Table of Donor Commitments ................................................ 16 
Appendix B. Map of USAID NTD Program ................................................................................. 19 
 
Congressional Research Service 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Contacts 
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 19 
 
Congressional Research Service 

U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Introduction 
Over the past decade, global health has become a priority in U.S. foreign policy, and U.S. 
appropriations for global health-related efforts have more than tripled. Neglected tropical diseases 
(NTDs) have become an important part of these efforts.1 Congressional appropriations for NTDs 
have grown from $15 million in FY2006 to $89 million in FY2012. The Administration requested 
$67 million to support NTD programs in FY2013. Heightened congressional interest in 
combating NTDs has been reflected not only in higher appropriation levels but also in the 
development of caucuses on these issues. In October 2009, the House Malaria Caucus expanded 
its purview to include NTDs, and in September 2012, the Senate Malaria Caucus did the same.  
Tropical diseases encompass all diseases that occur solely, or principally, in the tropics.2 Of these, 
the World Health Organization (WHO) describes 17 as “neglected tropical diseases,” as until 
recently, resources for curing, controlling, and researching improved treatments for these were 
limited. The 17 NTDs are found mostly among the poorest people in 149 countries and territories 
(Figure 1), primarily where access to clean water, sanitation, and health services is limited. Some 
NTDs are transmitted by people; others are spread by vectors like snails, flies, or mosquitoes; and 
several others proliferate in contaminated sources (like infested soil or water). Among the 17 
NTDs, 7 account for roughly 90% of the global NTD burden (Table 1). These are the three soil-
transmitted helminthiases [intestinal worms (STH)], schistosomiasis (snail fever), lymphatic 
filariasis (elephantiasis), trachoma, and onchocerciasis (river blindness). Intestinal worms or STH 
account for more than 80% of the seven most common NTDs (Figure 2). 
Figure 1. Global NTD Burden Map 
 
Source: Adapted by CRS from Uniting to Combat NTDs, http://www.unitingtocombatntds.org/downloads/
press/ntd_event_burden_map_updated.pdf, accessed on October 25, 2012. 
                                                 
1 For additional background information on NTDs, see CRS Report R41607, Neglected Tropical Diseases: 
Background, Responses, and Issues for Congress, by Tiaji Salaam-Blyther. 
2 WHO webpage on tropical diseases at http://www.who.int/topics/tropical_diseases/en/.  
Congressional Research Service 
1 

U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Table 1. 17 Neglected Tropical Diseases 
Seven Most Common NTDs (90% of all NTDs) 
Other NTDs 
Lymphatic Filariasis (Elephantiasis) 
Buruli Ulcer 
Onchocerciasis (River Blindness) 
Chagas Disease 
Schistosomiasis (Snail Fever) 
Cysticercosis/Taeniasis 
Soil-Transmitted Helminthiases  (STH) 
Dengue 
•  Hookworm 
Dracunculiasis (Guinea worm disease) 
•  Whipworm 
Echinococcosis 
•  Roundworm 
Foodborne Trematode Infections 
Trachoma 
Human African Trypanosomiasis (Sleeping Sickness) 
 Leishmaniasis 
 Leprosy 
 Rabies 
 Yaws 
Source: Created by CRS from WHO website on NTDs, http://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/diseases/en/, 
accessed on November 7, 2012. 
Drugs used in global NTD programs to 
Figure 2. Estimated Prevalence of Seven Most 
treat the seven most common NTDs are 
Common NTDs 
donated or sold by pharmaceutical 
companies at subsidized prices ranging 
between $0.02 and $2.23 per dose. These 
drugs are taken once or twice annually.3 
Although costs vary by location, treating 
these diseases has become increasingly 
inexpensive relative to other diseases 
that commonly afflict the poor in 
developing countries (Table 2). The cost 
of treating some NTDs has dropped in 
part because medicines to treat several of 
the most common NTDs are 
interchangeable and can be used to treat 
more than one disease. In addition, 
treatments for the most common NTDs 
can be dispensed to a broad population 
irrespective of individual disease status. 
This process, known as mass drug 
administration (MDA), has become an 
 
important tool in global efforts to control 
and eliminate NTDs. 
Source: Created by CRS from Peter Hotez, Forgotten 
People, Forgotten Diseases (Washington, DC: ASM Press, 
2008). 
                                                 
3 WHO, Accelerating Work to Overcome the Global Impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Roadmap for 
Implementation, 2012, p. 16. 
Congressional Research Service 
2 

U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Table 2. Annual Per Patient Cost of Treating Key Infectious Diseases Globally 
(U.S. dollars) 
Disease 
Low Estimate 
High Estimate 
HIV/AIDS 100.00 
335.00 
Tuberculosis 100.00  500.00 
Malaria 0.50 
1.40 
NTDs 0.02 
2.23 
Sources: HIV/AIDS data was compiled from UNAIDS, World AIDS Day Report, 2012, p. 17 and Department of 
State, The President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief Eighth Annual Report to Congress, 2012, p. 3. Tuberculosis data 
was taken from WHO, Global Tuberculosis Report, 2012, p. 52. Malaria data was taken from WHO, World Malaria 
Report, 2011, p. x,. NTD data was taken from WHO, Accelerating Work to Overcome the Global Impact of Neglected 
Tropical Diseases: A Roadmap for Implementation, 2012, p. 16. 
Global Progress in Combating NTDs 
Tremendous progress has been made in tackling NTDs since 2003, when the term “neglected 
tropical diseases” was coined at the first WHO meeting on a set of diseases that worsened poverty 
and for which solutions had not been prioritized. Until then, the international community had 
emphasized some of these diseases, but interventions for others languished. Two diseases for 
which long-term international focus has led to considerable reductions in incidence are 
dracunculiasis (Guinea worm disease), which has been nearly eradicated, and sleeping sickness, 
whose cases have dropped by some 75%. Since 1986, the number of new Guinea worm disease 
cases has fallen by 99% (Figure 3). By the end of 2011, the disease was endemic in only four 
countries: Chad, Ethiopia, Mali, and South Sudan. Nearly 97% of the 1,058 cases identified in 
2011 occurred in South Sudan, where instability remains a key threat to eradication. 
Figure 3. Global Guinea Worm Disease Cases: 1989-2010 
 
Source: Adapted by CRS from WHO, Accelerating Work to Overcome the Global Impact of Neglected Tropical 
Diseases: A Roadmap for Implementation, 2012, p. 10. 
Congressional Research Service 
3 

U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Important advances have been seen as well in decreasing new cases of Human African 
Trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness). After seeing increases in annual cases over a decade, reports 
of new sleeping sickness cases began to drop precipitously in 1999. From 1998 through 2010, 
reported cases fell by roughly 75% (Figure 4). 
Figure 4. Global Sleeping Sickness Cases: 1990-2010 
 
Source: Adapted by CRS from WHO, Working to Overcome the Global Impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases: 
Update 2011, 2011, p. 7. 
Progress in tackling NTDs is rooted in several factors:  
•  large, open-ended donations by pharmaceutical companies;  
•  increased funding from donors;  
•  intensified attention by the international community;  
•  integrated disease treatment regimens; and  
•  enhanced cooperation among recipient countries, pharmaceutical companies, 
non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and donors.  
Countries develop national NTD plans and receive financial support from donors to implement 
them. The WHO and donors, such as the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), 
review drug donation applications and support country-level planning, training, and monitoring 
and evaluation. Drug companies provide treatments used for national NTD plans, either for free 
or at highly discounted rates. NGOs and faith-based organizations partner with recipient countries 
to implement the NTD plans. Academic groups, public-private partnerships, and pharmaceutical 
companies research and develop innovative treatments and control mechanisms. 
Congressional Research Service 
4 

U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Global Actions in 2012 
In 2007, WHO released the Global Plan to Combat Neglected Tropical Diseases, which outlined 
several goals and targets for global control, elimination, and eradication of NTDs by 2015.4 Three 
key goals included in the plan were to  
•  eliminate or eradicate selected NTDs; 
•  reduce the burden of NTDs that can be treated with MDA5 by:  
•  ensuring that at least 65% of populations at risk of lymphatic filariasis 
(elphantiasis) have access to treatment; 
•  ensuring that at least 75% of school-aged children at risk of STH and 
schistosomiasis have access to treatment; 
•  advance novel approaches to treating and controlling NTDs, particularly for 
those that are costly and difficult to treat. 
Figure 5. Global Access to Drugs for Seven Most Common NTDs: 2005-2009 
 
Source: Adapted by CRS from WHO, Accelerating Work to Overcome the Global Impact of Neglected 
Tropical Diseases: A Roadmap for Implementation, 2012, p. 6. 
In 2012, WHO released a report that highlighted progress in reaching the 2015 goals and set new 
ones for 2020.6 Key goals include 
•  ensuring supply of drugs and other interventions to help:  
•  eradicate Guinea worm disease. 
•  eliminate elephantiasis, leprosy, sleeping sickness, and blinding trachoma by 
2020. 
                                                 
4 WHO, Global Plan to Combat Neglected Tropical Diseases 2008-2015, 2007. 
5 Mass drug administration refers to preemptively treating all people in an affected area without testing to establish 
individual diagnoses. 
6 Ibid, Accelerating Work to Overcome the Global Impact of Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Roadmap for 
Implementation, 2012. 
Congressional Research Service 
5 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
•  control snail fever, soil-transmitted helminthiases (STH), Chagas disease, 
visceral leishmaniasis, and river blindness by 2020;7 
•  advancing R&D to identify next-generation treatments and interventions; and 
•  providing technical support, tools, and resources for monitoring and evaluation. 
The report noted progress in treating onchocerciasis (river blindness), but little improvement in 
expanding access to medicines for schistosomiasis (snail fever) and soil-transmitted helminthiases 
due to inadequate drug supply (Figure 5). Insufficient progress in tackling STH is important, as 
these diseases account for roughly 80% of the seven most common NTDs (Figure 2).  
The London Declaration on Neglected Tropical Diseases 
Following the release of the 2012 WHO report, 13 pharmaceutical companies, the Bill & Melinda 
Gates Foundation (Gates Foundation), the World Bank, several NGOs, and officials representing 
the United States, Britain, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) convened in London, England, to 
reaffirm their commitment to combatting NTDs. Participants signed the London Declaration on 
Neglected Tropical Diseases, which highlighted the role each signatory would play in reaching 
the 2020 goals outlined in the WHO report.  
Implementing partners agreed to donate a range of treatments, funds, intellectual property rights, 
and research and development (R&D) resources. Appendix A lists the funding commitments and 
activities donors pledged to support.8 These pledges included 
•  $785 million (includes pre-existing commitments) to strengthen drug distribution 
and program implementation; 
•  1.4 billion drug treatments annually; 
•  access to drug compound libraries to identify new treatments; 
•  increased financial support for NTD programs (some of which amended previous 
commitments to ongoing efforts), such as: 
•  a five-year, $363 million pledge by the Gates Foundation, 
•  a five-year, £245 million (roughly $393 million) pledge by Britain, and 
•  a joint $40 million donation to the Carter Center by UAE, Gates Foundation, 
and the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation; 
•  commitments by the governments of Bangladesh, Brazil, Mozambique, and 
Tanzania to devote political and financial resources to combat endemic NTDs. 
Pledges by pharmaceutical companies to support research and development (R&D) on new 
treatments, vaccines, and testing supplies is vital considering the emergence of evidence that 
hookworm, one of the STHs (that comprise 80% of all NTDs), may be developing resistance to 
                                                 
7 Eradicate means to end all transmission of a disease worldwide by exterminating the agent. Eliminate means to 
reduce transmission of a disease to a predetermined low level (not necessarily zero) with the aim of interrupting the 
transmission cycle. When elimination is achieved, MDA is no longer necessary and case detection is used to identify 
individual cases. Control refers to operations or programs aimed at reducing incidence or prevalence of a disease. 
8 http://www.unitingtocombatntds.org/downloads/press/ntd_event_table_of_commitments.pdf. 
Congressional Research Service 
6 

U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
existing medication.9 Concerns about drug resistance aside, R&D commitments are also 
important as signatories of the London Declaration indicate existing tools are not sufficient to 
meet the WHO 2020 goals (Figure 6). 
Figure 6. Global Progress on 2020 Goals 
 
Source: Adapted by CRS from Uniting to Combat NTDs, http://www.unitingtocombatntds.org/downloads/
press/ntd_event_2020_goals_graphic.pdf, accessed on October 25, 2012. 
Notes: “Possible progress with existing tools” predicts advancement of elimination and control efforts without 
development of new tools. “Possible progress with new tools” predicts advancements that could be made if new 
tools were developed, such as more effective treatments and vaccines. 
* Guinea worm disease is targeted for eradication. 
Acronyms: Lymphatic Filariasis (LF), Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT), Soil-Transmitted Helminthiases 
(STH). 
U.S. Efforts to Tackle NTDs 
U.S.-based institutions have long supported efforts to control NTDs. These institutions include 
the federal government, pharmaceutical companies, philanthropic organizations, and NGOs. Key 
U.S. government players include the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), U.S. 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and 
Department of Defense (DOD).10 NGOs include groups like the Carter Center and RTI 
International; philanthropic organizations include the Gates Foundation and the Sabin Vaccine 
                                                 
9 Hotez, Peter “Mass Drug Administration and Integrated Control for the World’s High-Prevalence Neglected Tropical 
Diseases,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 85, no. 6 (June 2009), pp. 659-664. 
10 For more information on related efforts by these agencies, see CRS Report R41607, Neglected Tropical Diseases: 
Background, Responses, and Issues for Congress, by Tiaji Salaam-Blyther. 
Congressional Research Service 
7 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Institute; and private companies include Merck, Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer. While each of 
these plays an important role in combating NTDs, this section focuses exclusively on the USAID-
managed NTD Program.11  
In 2006, the Bush Administration launched the Neglected Tropical Disease Control Program, the 
first U.S. effort to address a group of NTDs. The program was created in response to language in 
the FY2006 Foreign Operations Appropriations Act, which made available up to $15 million “to 
support an integrated response to the control of neglected diseases including intestinal parasites 
[STH], schistosomiasis, lymphatic filariasis, onchocerciasis, trachoma and leprosy.”12 The 
language signaled congressional support for calls to integrate and expand access to drugs for the 
seven most common NTDs. Until that time, most countries and their implementing partners 
focused on tackling a single NTD. The NTD Program sought to document the feasibility of 
integrating treatment for several NTDs and advance application of this strategy. At the outset, the 
NTD program aimed to support the provision of 160 million NTD treatments to 40 million people 
in 15 countries. In 2008, President George W. Bush reaffirmed his commitment to the program 
and proposed spending $350 million over six years (from FY2008 through FY2013) on 
expanding the program to 30 countries.13  
During his first term, President Barack Obama named the NTD Program a priority. While 
announcing the Global Health Initiative (GHI) in May 2009,14 President Obama indicated the 
NTD Program would be a key part of the initiative and would be increasingly integrated into 
other global health efforts. The 2009-2014 Lantos-Hyde United States Government Malaria 
Strategy exemplifies this priority by outlining how the Administration plans to integrate malaria 
and NTD activities with other U.S. global health efforts.15  
Through GHI, the Obama Administration seeks to 
•  administer 1 billion NTD treatments,  
•  halve the prevalence of the seven most common NTDs by 2013,  
•  eliminate leprosy in all endemic countries by 2016, 
•  eliminate onchocerciasis in Latin America by 2016, and 
•  eliminate lymphatic filariasis globally by 2017. 
Through the first half of FY2012, the NTD Program had supported the provision of 584.6 million 
treatments (Figure 7) to 257.9 million people across 20 countries. A map of the countries is in 
Appendix B. 
                                                 
11 See respective websites of each organization for additional information on their NTD Programs. 
12 Section 593, P.L. 109-102, FY2006 Foreign Operations Appropriations. 
13 See White House, “President Bush Announces New Global Initiative To Combat Neglected Tropical Diseases,” 
press release, February 20, 2008. 
14 For more information on GHI, see CRS Report R41851, U.S. Global Health Assistance: Background and Issues for 
the 112th Congress, by Tiaji Salaam-Blyther. 
15 USAID et al., Lantos-Hyde United States Government Malaria Strategy, 2009-2014, April 2010. 
Congressional Research Service 
8 


U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Figure 7. NTD Treatments Administered in USAID Programs: FY2007-FY2012 
 
Source: Adapted by CRS from NTD Program website at http://www.neglecteddiseases.gov/about/index.html, 
accessed on November 28, 2012. 
FY2013 Funding 
Figure 8. USAID Spending on the NTD Program: 
FY2006-FY2012 
USAID has spent more than $300 
(current U.S. $ millions) 
million on the NTD Program since it 
100
began in FY2006 through FY2012 
89
(Figure 8). The FY2013 budget 
90
request includes $67 million for the 
80
77
program. The 112th Congress did not 
70
65
67
complete legislation for FY2013 
60
Foreign Operations Appropriations, 
through which the program is funded. 
50
The House Appropriations 
40
Committee included positive 
30
language about the program but did 
25
not specify an amount for the NTD 
20
15
15
15
effort in its committee report. The 
10
Senate Appropriations Committee 
0
recommended $125 million for the 
FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013*  
program in its committee report. 
Source: Adapted by CRS from USAID website, 
http://www.neglecteddiseaess.gov/funding/index.html, accessed 
on October 25, 2012. 
Issues for Congress 
Notes: *FY2013 amount is a budgetary request. 
The international community has made substantial progress in combating select neglected tropical 
diseases. Some NTDs have been tackled more effectively than others. Guinea worm disease, for 
example, is on the cusp of eradication and with expanding mass drug administration campaigns, 
the prevalence of several NTDs is declining, particularly in Latin America. Despite these 
advancements, WHO cautions in the 2020 Roadmap that these diseases cannot be banished 
without improving global access to clean water and sanitation, strengthening local health capacity 
(veterinary as well as human), and intensifying case detection and management.  
Congressional Research Service 
9 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
The United States has played an important role in combating NTDs and will likely be a central 
player in global efforts to advance the 2020 NTD goals. Recommendations for congressional 
action may largely reflect broader arguments about the appropriate role for Congress in 
improving global health. Analysts who applaud congressional directives that set programmatic 
targets, outline the types of activities to be implemented in U.S. global health programs, and 
mandate reporting requirements would probably argue for the 113th Congress to take similar steps 
in meeting the 2020 NTD goals. Observers who maintain that these steps make U.S. global health 
programs less effective by minimizing the capacity of implementing agencies to adapt global 
health programs to local conditions would likely argue for limiting congressional support for 
combating NTDs to appropriating sufficient resources.  
The section below discusses a range of issues U.S. and international organizations may face as 
they attempt to reach the WHO 2020 goals, as well as those set by the Administration (see “U.S. 
Efforts to Tackle NTDs”). Some of the discussion includes an analysis of steps the 113th Congress 
might consider.  
Accessing Clean Water and Sanitation  
Transmission of most NTDs is facilitated by insufficient access to clean water and sanitation.16 
An estimated 2 billion people are carrying soil-transmitted helminths, for example, which are 
spread primarily through openly defecating on the ground. Eggs of these intestinal worms, which 
account for roughly 80% of the seven most common NTDs (which together account for about 
90% of all NTD cases), can persist in the environment for many years. 
Experts at the CDC assert that water and sanitation improvement should be a central component 
of any effective and sustainable approach to controlling NTDs.17 One estimate indicates that 
improved sanitation and water safety can reduce the prevalence rates of schistosomiasis by 75% 
and blinding trachoma by 25%.18 Water and sanitation improvement are particularly important 
when addressing pathogens that cannot be eliminated by drugs alone, such as STH and 
schistosomiasis.  
Several experts urge greater investments in water and sanitation and see attainment of global 
water and sanitation goals as an important step towards eliminating NTDs.19 Through the 
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the international community sought to halve the share 
of people without access to clean water and basic sanitation by 2015.20 WHO estimated that 
                                                 
16 For more information on U.S. and international efforts to improve access to clean water and sanitation, see CRS 
Report R42717, Global Access to Clean Drinking Water and Sanitation: U.S. and International Programs, by Tiaji 
Salaam-Blyther. 
17 See CDC, WASH Away Neglected Tropical Diseases, Activity Summary, June 2010, http://www.cdc.gov/
healthywater/pdf/global/programs/wash-away-ntd-summary.pdf and CDC, WASH Away Neglected Tropical Diseases, 
Program in Brief, June 2010. 
18 Philip Musgrove and Peter Hotez, “Turning Neglected Tropical Diseases Into Forgotten Maladies,” Health Affairs, 
vol. 28, no. 6 (November/December 2009), p. 1698. 
19 Burton Singer, “Viewpoint by Burton Singer: Bring Back Primary Prevention for Relieving the Burden of NTDs,” 
PLoS Medicine, vol. 7, no. 5 (May 2010), p. e1000255; and TR Burkot et al., “The Argument for Integrating Vector 
Control with Multiple Drug Administration Campaigns to Ensure Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis,” Filaria 
Journal, vol. 5, no. 10 (August 2006). 
20 The United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly adopted a declaration in 2000, which among other things, committed 
member states to advance health development around the world. See, United Nations Millennium Declaration, 
(continued...) 
Congressional Research Service 
10 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
between 2005 and 2015, it would cost $72 billion annually to implement and maintain enough 
water and sanitation schemes to meet global water and sanitation targets, of which $54 billion 
would need to be spent on maintaining the systems.21 In 2010, members of the Organization for 
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) committed $7.8 billion towards improving 
global access to clean drinking water and sanitation.22 U.S. and global investments in sanitation 
would need to increase significantly to meet this funding gap.  
The 113th Congress has at its disposal an important tool for ensuring U.S. water and sanitation 
resources are used to reinforce the NTD Program. The Senator Paul Simon Water for the Poor Act 
(P.L. 109-121), which amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, requires the Secretary of State 
to develop a strategy for expanding global access to clean water and sanitation. The act specifies 
that the strategy should include 
specific and measurable goals, benchmarks, and timetables to achieve the objective described 
in [the strategy]; 
methods to coordinate and integrate United States water and sanitation assistance programs 
with other United States development assistance programs to achieve the objective described 
[in the strategy].23 
As of the publication of this report, the Administration had not yet released a water strategy, 
though one is reportedly imminent.24 The 113th Congress could request testimony from 
Administration officials on the progress in developing a strategy and integrating other 
development assistance programs, including global health programs like the NTD Program per 
legislation. 
Integrating the U.S. NTD Program  
Investments in water and sanitation are considered important, as mass drug administration 
campaigns cannot be used in isolation to eliminate NTDs. The process of combating diseases by 
combining responses by practitioners across sectors, particularly those related to health, 
agriculture, water, construction, and waste disposal, is known as integrated vector management. 
Indeed, the United States was unable to control hookworm (an STH) within its own borders until 
                                                                  
(...continued) 
September 18, 2000, http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.pdf. Shortly thereafter, delegates developed 
the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to guide attainment of the priorities outlined in the Millennium 
Declaration. The eight MDGs are: (MDG1) eradicate poverty and hunger, (MDG2) achieve universal primary 
education, (MDG3) promote gender equality and empower women, (MDG4) reduce child mortality by two-thirds, 
(MDG5) reduce maternal mortality by two-thirds, (MDG6) combat HIV/AIDS, malaria, and other diseases, (MDG7) 
ensure environmental sustainability, and (MDG8) develop a global partnership for development. MDG7 includes the 
water and sanitation targets. 
21 Guy Hutton and Jamie Bartram, Regional and Global Costs of Attaining the Water Supply and Sanitation Target of 
the Millennium Development Goals, WHO, 2008, p. iv, http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/
economic_mdg_global_costing.pdf. 
22 OECD, Aid Activity Database, http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx, accessed on July 31, 2012. For more information on 
U.S. spending on improving global access to water and sanitation, see CRS Report R42717, Global Access to Clean 
Drinking Water and Sanitation: U.S. and International Programs, by Tiaji Salaam-Blyther.  
23 Sec. 6, P.L. 109-121. 
24  Personal communication with Chris Holmes, Water Coordinator, USAID, October 19, 2012. 
Congressional Research Service 
11 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
the early 1900s, when an integrated vector management (IVM) approach was applied.25 WHO 
maintains that an effective NTD response would use an intersectoral approach that is based on 
five areas:  
1.  mass drug administration; 
2.  intensified case-management;  
3.  vector control;  
4.  safe water, sanitation, and hygiene; and  
5.  veterinary public health (by also controlling the NTDs that are zoonotic).26  
It is unclear whether the U.S. NTD Program adheres to this multi-faceted approach. Documents 
by the Administration maintain the NTD Program is part of a complete package of services the 
United States provides to improve the health of women and children across sectors.27 The 
Administration intends, for example, to expand the provision of drugs that treat STH in children 
within USAID-supported education programs.28 Similarly, the Obama Administration underscores 
the intersection between water and sanitation and categorizes it as a “cross-cutting area” under 
global health. Nonetheless, in reports to Congress on progress towards advancing global health 
(through congressional budget justifications, for example) the Administration provides little 
information about how water and sanitation programs advance global health efforts or how they 
are integrated within global health projects.  
The structure of the FY2013 Foreign Operations budgetary request suggests some separation 
between these activities. Requests for water programs are made across a variety of accounts, 
primarily Development Assistance (DA) and Economic Support Fund (ESF). In FY2013, for 
example, the Administration requested only 12% of water and sanitation funds through the Global 
Health Programs account and 76% through the DA and ESF accounts. These two accounts 
support a wide range of governance and economic development activities, which do not typically 
focus on health objectives. 
Despite the limitations of mass drug administration, the U.S. NTD Program focuses almost 
exclusively on MDA. Administration officials recognize the importance of a comprehensive NTD 
Program, but maintain that “the directive from Congress was to focus on mass drug 
administration. [G]iven the limited resources, [MDA] is the most efficient and cost-effective way 
to control [and] eliminate these diseases.”29 The 113th Congress might debate the merits of 
applying an intersectoral approach to the NTD Program. Broadening the U.S. approach may not 
necessarily entail raising spending, but could involve improving the integration of U.S. health and 
development programs. The 113th Congress could, for example, request information on how key 
                                                 
25 In the early 1900s, the Rockefeller Foundation and its implementing partners combined wide-scale sanitation projects 
with drug administration and public education to eliminate hookworm infections, which plagued much of the 
southeastern United States at the time. For more on this approach, see E.A. Alderman et al., The Rockefeller Sanitary 
Commission for the Eradication of Hookworm Disease (Washington, DC: Offices of the Commission, 1915). This book 
is available on-line at http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924005710839.  
26 Zoonotic diseases are transmissible under natural conditions from vertebrate animals to humans. 
27 Department of State, Implementation of the Global Health Initiative: Consultation Document, February 2010, p. 20. 
28 Ibid, p. 15. 
29 Emily Wainwright, USAID, Senior Operations Advisor, Neglected Tropical Diseases Program, December 27, 2012. 
Congressional Research Service 
12 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
leaders at USAID (e.g., the Deputy of the Global Health Initiative and the Water Coordinator) 
coordinate their programs. 
Strengthening Health Systems 
Despite the consistent decline in NTD cases since the turn of the century, weak health systems 
and conflict in some developing countries continue to hamper efforts to eliminate many NTDs. In 
the case of human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness), for example, the international 
community had practically interrupted transmission of the disease in the 1960s.30 Following the 
marked drop in cases, the recipient countries failed to maintain sufficient funding levels for 
ensuring adequate treatment measures and disease surveillance. At the same time, conflict in key 
areas (Angola, Sudan, and Uganda) hampered efforts to control the disease as infected individuals 
fleeing conflict entered areas under which health workers initially arrested the spread of sleeping 
sickness.31 Additionally, during fighting, health workers were barred from monitoring some areas. 
By the 1980s, the disease had reemerged, and by the 1990s, cases were growing dramatically 
(Figure 4).  
Resurgence occurred for several reasons, one of the greatest being weak capacity to maintain 
disease surveillance. Weak veterinary and public health systems limit the ability of several 
affected countries to enhance NTD programs or maintain them after international support wanes. 
Many critics of “vertical” or “disease-specific” programs see the poor conditions of health 
systems in several developing countries as an outcome of the burgeoning investments in vertical 
disease programs. One argument is that disease-specific efforts divert investments from the very 
public health systems that are needed to support vertical programs. Supporters of disease-specific 
initiatives argue, on the other hand, that such activities facilitate dramatic, measurable progress. 
Advocates of this approach point to dramatic reductions in recent years of deaths associated with 
HIV/AIDS and malaria. The merits of vertical disease programs have been long debated in the 
global health community and evidence supports both sides of the debate.  
President Obama attempted to reconcile both viewpoints when he launched the Global Health 
Initiative in 2009. While announcing GHI, the President called for the development of a strategy 
that integrates health programs (where appropriate); supports primary health systems; and 
coordinates health activities across U.S. agencies. The initiative did not call for an end to so-
called vertical programs. Indeed, the Administration has maintained support for key vertical 
programs like the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), the President’s 
Malaria Initiative (PMI), and the NTD Program.  
The sustainability of U.S. global health investments was a central focus in the 112th Congress and 
will likely be an issue of importance for the next Congress. Should the 113th Congress maintain 
interest in this area, it may consider sustaining existing reporting requirements on implementation 
of the GHI, particularly those elements that are aimed at strengthening health systems. Key 
programs (e.g., Global Disease Detection program) supported by the Centers for Disease Control 
                                                 
30  Pere Simarro et al., “The Human African Trypanosomiasis Control and Surveillance Programme of the World 
Health Organization 2000-2009: The Way Forward,” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 5, no. 2 (February 2011), 
p. e1007. 
31 WHO, Control and Surveillance of African Trypanosomiasis, WHO Technical Report Series, Number 881, 1998, p. 
43, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_881.pdf. 
Congressional Research Service 
13 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
and Prevention (CDC) that bolster surveillance capacity, for example, could be instrumental in 
advancing the NTD Program.32  
Sustaining Advancements 
NTD treatments are considered relatively inexpensive to administer (Table 2). The treatment 
costs are low primarily because pharmaceutical companies donate these drugs for little or no cost. 
Medicines that are not offered for free are typically sold at subsidized prices ranging between 
$0.02 and $1.02 per course.33 When signing the London Declaration, several pharmaceutical 
companies pledged to maintain or increase donations of NTD treatments through 2020 
(Appendix A). While these steps have enabled the USAID NTD program—and presumably other 
global NTD programs—to run at low costs, they also mean that these efforts are heavily reliant 
upon pharmaceutical companies.  
According to one USAID official, “without the drug donations, there really wouldn’t be a U.S. 
Government program.”34 As a result of drug donations, for example, USAID was reportedly able 
to disseminate NTD treatments valued at over $1 billion for $89 million from FY2006 through 
FY2011. Furthermore, the agency predicts that within two years, USAID will not have to 
purchase any more drugs due to pharmaceutical donations. 
The extent to which global health programs, in general, and NTD programs, in particular, rely on 
donor support has been both a boon and a burden to health systems in developing countries. 
Donor emphasis on key health issues, particularly infectious diseases, has enabled recipient 
countries to concentrate investments in other areas, particularly primary health care. Foreign 
investments in tackling infectious diseases have contributed not only to reductions in related 
fatalities but also in improvements in other health indicators, such as child survival and maternal 
health. At the same time, many developing countries have become reliant upon donors to fund 
many major health initiatives. In some cases, ministries of finance have reduced national health 
budgets when foreign health aid has risen.35 The reasons for cutting ministry of health budgets 
can include insufficient capacity to spend substantially larger budgets for a variety of reasons 
including low staff levels; loan requirements (e.g., requirements by international financing 
institutions to reduce national spending); or redirected spending on other sectors like education, 
agriculture, or infrastructure. 
Global health experts are now grappling with sustaining and advancing improvements seen over 
the past several years. Given the substantial contributions made by the U.S. government in this 
area, resources available for addressing global health challenges may undergo scrutiny as the 
113th Congress faces public pressure to resolve growing domestic debt. Congress has exercised 
increased involvement in shaping global health programs through funding distribution guidelines, 
spending directives and limitations, and priority-area recommendations. Some argue that 
                                                 
32 For more information on CDC’s global health programs, including GDD, see CRS Report R40239, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention Global Health Programs: FY2001-FY2012 Request, by Tiaji Salaam-Blyther. 
33 WHO, Integrated Control of the Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Neglected Opportunity Ripe for Action, May 2008, 
p. 3. 
34  Information in this paragraph was compiled from correspondence with Emily Wainwright, USAID, Senior 
Operations Advisor, Neglected Tropical Diseases Program, December 27, 2012. 
35  Chunling Lu et al., “Public Financing of Health in Developing Countries: A Cross-National Systematic Analysis,” 
The Lancet, vol. 375 (April 17, 2010), pp. 1375-1387. 
Congressional Research Service 
14 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
congressional spending directives have limited the ability of country teams to tailor programs to 
in-country needs. Others argue that congressional mandates and recommendations serve to 
protect critical areas in need of support and encourage the Administration to address health issues 
that it may not otherwise prioritize. The extent of continual congressional involvement will likely 
face rigorous debate in the 113th Congress. 
Congressional Research Service 
15 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Appendix A. London Declaration: Table of Donor Commitments 
Table A-1. London Declaration: Table of Donor Commitments 
NTD Disease 
Activity 
Financial Commitment 
Contributor 
Outline disease-specific goals and strategies for control and elimination 
 
World Health Organization (WHO) 
Research and develop new programs and country-specific approaches for combating Guinea worm 
U.K. Department for International 
disease, lymphatic filariasis, river blindness, schistosomiasis, blinding trachoma, visceral leishmaniasis 
£195 million 2011-2015  
Development (DFID) 
Maintain support in over 20 countries; expand support to include Mozambique, Senegal, Cambodia 
Build on U.S. $301 million 
U.S. Agency for International 
investment since 2006 
Development (USAID) 
Overcome barriers to success and address critical gaps to achieve the control and elimination of 
$363 million over five years 
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 
targeted NTDs by 2020 
Expand work in NTD control and program enhancement 
$5 million to selected sites in 
Mundo Sano 
the Americas and Africa 
Country level: build stronger community health systems and integrate NTD elimination and control. 
Extend financial and technical 
Regional level: oversee finances for trust fund to fight river blindness in Africa and partner with 
support 
World Bank 
other entities to expand trust fund to eliminate or control preventable NTDs in Africa 
Multiple NTDs 
Apply WHO recommendations for implementing coordinated NTD plan 
 
Brazil 
Implement fully integrated, multi-sectoral NTD plan; reach full geographic coverage of all endemic 
areas for lymphatic filariasis, STH, and schistosomiasis; map and reach full geographic coverage of 
trachoma by 2018; build capacity for surveillance and action to sustain gains from mass drug 
 
Mozambique 
administration program 
Implement integrated plan to control and eliminate NTDs 
 
Tanzania 
Implement integrated plan to control and eliminate NTDs 
 
Bangladesh 
Consider use of Ivermectin for other NTDs 
 
Merck 
Provide third parties, including Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), access to selected 
 
Bayer 
substances out of compound libraries to find new NTD treatments 
Provide third parties, including DNDi, access to selected proprietary compound libraries to develop 
 
Bristol-Myers Squibb 
new medicines for certain NTDs 
Donate Azithromycin to a study on the potential for the drug to reduce mortality in young children 
 
Pfizer 
CRS-16 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
NTD Disease 
Activity 
Financial Commitment 
Contributor 
Elimination of trachoma in China 
$6.9 million 
Pfizer 
Blinding 
Trachoma 
Continued donation of Azithromycin for blinding trachoma until at least 2020 
 
Lions Clubs International 
Foundation 
Double existing annual donation of Nifurtimox to 1 million tablets through 2020 
 
Bayer 
Chagas Disease 
Abbot, AstraZeneca, Eisai, 
Provide DNDi targeted access to proprietary compound libraries to develop new medicines 
 
GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis, 
Pfizer, and Sanofi 
Gates Foundation ($23.3 
million); DFID (£20million); 
Guinea worm 
United Arab Emirates ($10 
DFID, Gates Foundation, United 
disease 
Fil  global funding gap 
million); Children’s 
Arab Emirates, Children’s 
Investment Fund Foundation 
Investment Fund Foundation 
($6.7 million) 
Extend existing donation of rifampicin, clofazimine, and dapsone through 2020 in quantities 
Leprosy 
requested by WHO 
 
Novartis 
Organize multi-stakeholder initiative to intensify leprosy control efforts 
 
Novartis 
Provide 120 million DEC tablets  to WHO for its Global Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination program;  
ensure a sufficient supply of DEC from 2012 through 2020 
 
Gates Foundation, Eisai, and Sanofi 
Lymphatic 
Filariasis 
Donate 2.2 billion tablets of DEC from 2014-2020 
 
Eisai 
Maintain annual donation of 600 mil ion tablets of Albendazole indefinitely 
 
GlaxoSmithKline 
Repurpose Flubendazole to kill adult worms associated with lymphatic filariasis and river blindness; 
conduct drug reformulation studies; provide expertise for pre-clinical development and provide 
 
Abbot, DNDi, Johnson & Johnson, 
technical and supply assistance.  If pre-clinical development is successful, Johnson & Johnson will co-
Pfizer 
Lymphatic 
fund clinical development; obtain regulatory approval; provide technical support 
Filariasis and 
River Blindness 
Provide DNDi with access to proprietary compound libraries to develop new medicines that kill 
 
AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, 
(Onchocerciasis) 
adult worms associated with lymphatic filariasis and river blindness 
Novartis, Sanofi 
Increase annual donation of Praziquantel from 25 million to 250 mil ion tablets/year indefinitely 
 
Merck KGaA 
Develop child-friendly formulation of Praziquantel 
 
 
River Blindness  
Maintain unlimited donation of Ivermectin indefinitely 
 
MSD 
CRS-17 
U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
NTD Disease 
Activity 
Financial Commitment 
Contributor 
Schistosomiasis 
Provide financial support for a WHO school-based schistomiasis  program 
 
Merck KGaA 
Extend existing donations of related treatments through 2020 
 
Sanofi 
Extend existing donations of related treatments through 2020 
 
Bayer 
Sleeping Sickness 
Abbot, AstraZeneca, Eisai, 
(Human African 
Provide DNDi with access to proprietary compound libraries to develop new medicines 
 
GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Novartis, 
Trypanosomiasis) 
Pfizer and Sanofi 
Partner with DNDi to develop a new oral drug candidate for sleeping sickness 
 
Sanofi 
Logistical support to ensure drugs reach patients at point of care free of charge 
 
 
Soil-Transmitted 
Extend donation of 400 million Albendazole tablets/year through 2020 
 
GlaxoSmithKline 
Helminthiases 
Extend donation of 200 million Mebendazole tablets/year to 2020 
 
Johnson & Johnson 
Abbot, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Novartis, 
Provide DNDi with access to proprietary compound libraries to develop new medicines 
 
Pfizer, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, and 
MSD 
Partner with DNDi to transform drug currently in trials for Chagas Disease as a new treatment for 
Visceral 
 
Eisai 
leishmaniasis 
Leishmaniasis 
Donate AmBisome for 50,000 patients in South Asia and East Africa from 2012-2017; continue 
program to offer VL at cost; investigate and invest in technologies and process to reduce cost of 
 Gilead 
Ambisone in resource-limited countries 
Develop new training tools for leishmaniasis care for health care providers and patients 
 
Sanofi 
Source: Adapted by CRS from Uniting to Combat Neglected Tropical Diseases, Table of Commitments, January 30, 2012, http://www.unitingtocombatntds.org/
downloads/press/ntd_event_table_of_commitments.pdf. 
CRS-18 

U.S. and Global Progress in Combating Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) 
 
Appendix B. Map of USAID NTD Program 
Figure B-1. NTD Program Countries 
 
Source: USAID website on NTDs, http://www.neglecteddiseases.gov/countries/index.html, accessed on 
October 25, 2012. 
Notes: The 20 NTD Program countries are Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Cameroon, Democratic 
Republic of Congo, Ghana, Guinea, Haiti, Indonesia, Mali, Mozambique, Nepal, Niger, Philippines, Senegal, Sierra 
Leone, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, and Vietnam. The countries in which USAID operates can change. In 2011, for 
example, USAID stopped operations in South Sudan as a result of new investments by another donor focused on 
NTD control activities in the country. 
 
 
Author Contact Information 
Tiaji Salaam-Blyther 
Specialist in Global Health 
tsalaam@crs.loc.gov, 7-7677 
 
Congressional Research Service 
19