Unemployment Insurance:
Consequences of Changes in State
Unemployment Compensation Laws
Katelin P. Isaacs
Analyst in Income Security
August 15, 2012
The House Ways and Means Committee is making available this version of this Congressional Research Service
(CRS) report, with the cover date shown, for inclusion in its 2012 Green Book website. CRS works exclusively
for the United States Congress, providing policy and legal analysis to Committees and Members of both the
House and Senate, regardless of party affiliation.
Congressional Research Service
R41859
CRS Report for Congress
Pr
epared for Members and Committees of Congress

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Summary
This report analyzes several types of recent changes to state Unemployment Compensation (UC)
programs. Three categories of UC state law issues are considered: (1) changes in the duration of
state UC unemployment benefits; (2) changes in the UC weekly benefit amount; and (3) the
enactment into state law of two trigger options for the Extended Benefit (EB) program.
In 2011 and 2012, several states enacted legislation to decrease the maximum number of weeks of
regular state UC benefits. Until recently, all states paid at least up to 26 weeks of UC benefits to
eligible, unemployed individuals. In 2011, however, six states passed legislation to decrease their
maximum UC benefit durations: Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, Missouri, and South
Carolina. In 2012, Georgia also passed legislation to decrease the maximum UC benefit duration.
Changes in UC benefit duration have consequences for the duration of federal unemployment
benefits that may be available to unemployed workers. State UC benefit duration is an underlying
factor in the calculation of duration for additional federal unemployment benefits. Thus, the
reduction of the maximum duration of regular UC benefits reduces the number of weeks available
to unemployed workers in the federal extended unemployment programs (including the
Emergency Unemployment Compensation [EUC08] and EB).
States are temporarily prohibited from actively changing their method of calculation for UC
benefits if it would decrease weekly benefit amounts (under P.L. 111-205, as amended), that is,
the “nonreduction” rule. Some states, however, make automatic adjustments to weekly benefit
amounts under existing state law. Consequently, when these states experience certain conditions,
such as a decrease in the average weekly wage used in the automatic adjustment calculation, their
maximum weekly UC benefit amount may be decreased. More recently, P.L. 112-96 provides an
exception to this “nonreduction” rule in the case of state legislation enacted before March 1,
2012. Any reduction to the UC weekly benefit amount also translates into reduced EUC08 and
EB weekly benefit amounts.
Finally, there are various optional EB trigger components—authorized under permanent federal
law (P.L. 91-373, as amended) and temporary federal law (P.L. 111-312, as amended, and P.L.
111-5, as amended)—that states may opt to enact under their state UC laws. Currently, 11 states
have adopted an optional trigger for the EB program, based on a state’s total unemployment rate
(TUR), into permanent state law. An additional 28 states have enacted this EB TUR trigger
temporarily, linking its expiration to the expiration of the temporary 100% federal financing of
the EB program under federal law (P.L. 111-5, as amended). Thirty-three states have adopted a
three-year lookback for this optional TUR trigger under current state law (temporarily authorized
under P.L. 111-312, as amended) to continue to meet the trigger criteria and continue to pay EB
benefits. In general, only states that have enacted at least one of these EB trigger options (i.e., the
TUR trigger or the three-year lookback) had been able to pay EB benefits in 2011 and 2012. As of
the week of August 12, 2012, no state meets the requirements to trigger onto EB using these EB
state law options.
Overall, these three types of changes to state UC laws and programs have consequences for the
availability, duration, and amount of unemployment benefits. This report describes these changes
and analyzes their consequences for UC, EUC08, and EB benefits. It will be updated, as needed,
to reflect any additional state UC changes.
Congressional Research Service

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Congressional Research Service

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Contents
Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1
Overview of Current Unemployment Benefits................................................................................ 1
Unemployment Compensation Program ................................................................................... 2
Maximum UC Benefit Duration.......................................................................................... 2
Emergency Unemployment Compensation Program ................................................................ 2
Extended Benefit Program ........................................................................................................ 4
State Law Changes to UC Benefit Duration .................................................................................... 4
Consequences of Reduced UC Benefit Duration for Federal Unemployment Programs.......... 7
Calculation of Benefit Duration for EUC08 Tiers............................................................... 7
Calculation of Benefit Duration for EB Payable Periods.................................................... 9
States with Reduced Weekly Benefit Amounts.............................................................................. 13
State Law Enactment of EB Trigger Options ................................................................................ 14

Tables
Table 1. States with Unemployment Compensation (UC) Law Changes That Decrease
Benefit Duration ........................................................................................................................... 6
Table 2. Adjusted Maximum EUC08 and EB Benefit Duration Resulting from Changes to
State Maximum UC Benefit Duration ........................................................................................ 10
Table 3. Extended Benefit (EB) Trigger Components Enacted by States...................................... 15

Congressional Research Service

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Introduction
As a result of continued, high unemployment in the aftermath of the recent recession (December
2007-June 2009), many states have enacted changes to their Unemployment Compensation (UC)
programs. These state UC changes seek to accomplish two goals. First, several states are
attempting to reduce the state costs of UC benefits, which are financed through state taxes on
employers. This reduction in state UC benefit spending may be achieved through two types of
state UC changes: (1) a reduction in the duration of state UC employment benefits and (2) a
reduction in the state UC weekly benefit amount.
Second, across several states, another major goal is to take advantage of additional, federal
unemployment benefits available through the permanent-law Extended Benefit (EB) program
because these benefits are temporarily 100% federally financed (through December 31, 2012,
under current law). In support of this second major goal, many states have enacted permanent or
temporary state laws to ensure that EB benefits are payable to eligible individuals.
This report first provides a brief overview of the unemployment compensation programs and
benefits that may currently be available to eligible, unemployed individuals. Next, the three
categories of UC state law issues are analyzed:
1. changes in the duration of state UC unemployment benefits;
2. changes in the maximum UC weekly benefit amount; and
3. the enactment into state law of two trigger options for the EB program.
Overview of Current Unemployment Benefits
Several unemployment insurance (UI) programs may currently provide benefits to unemployed
workers. When eligible workers lose their jobs, the UC program may provide up to 26 weeks of
income support through the payment of regular state UC benefits.1 These UC benefits may be
extended in two ways: (1) the temporarily authorized Emergency Unemployment Compensation
(EUC08) program provides up to four tiers of additional weeks of unemployment benefits to
certain workers who have exhausted their rights to UC benefits in states with high
unemployment;2 and (2) the EB program provides up to 13 or 20 weeks of additional
unemployment benefits if certain economic situations exist within the state.3

1 Or, in the case of the seven states described in the report section on “State Law Changes to UC Benefit Duration,” UC
pays fewer than up to 26 weeks.
2 See report section on “Calculation of Benefit Duration for EUC08 Tiers” for the calculation of EUC08 benefit
durations in states that have reduced regular UC benefit duration. In states without UC duration reductions up to 63
weeks of total EUC08 benefits may be available in certain states during the period of February 19, 2012-May 26, 2012;
up to 53 weeks of total EUC08 benefits may be available in certain states during the period of May 27, 2012-September
1, 2012; and up to 47 weeks of total EUC08 benefits may be available in certain states during the period of September
2, 2012-December 29, 2012. For more details on the structure and availability of EUC08 benefits at later dates, see
CRS Report R42444, Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08): Current Status of Benefits, by Julie M.
Whittaker and Katelin P. Isaacs.
3 See report section on “Calculation of Benefit Duration for EB Payable Periods” for the calculation of EB benefit
durations in states that have reduced regular UC benefit duration.
Congressional Research Service
1

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Provided below is a brief description of the benefits available through these three UI programs:
UC, EUC08, and EB. For detailed information on each of these programs, including more details
on the financing of each type of unemployment benefit, see CRS Report RL33362,
Unemployment Insurance: Programs and Benefits, by Julie M. Whittaker and Katelin P. Isaacs.
Unemployment Compensation Program
Authorized by the Social Security Act of 1935 (SSA; P.L. 74-271), UC is a joint federal-state
program that provides unemployment benefits to eligible individuals. Although federal laws and
regulations provide broad guidelines on UC benefit coverage, eligibility, and benefit
determination, the specifics regarding UC benefits are determined by each state. This results in
essentially 53 different programs.4 Generally, UC eligibility is based on attaining qualified wages
and employment in covered work over a 12-month period (called a base period) prior to
unemployment. All states require a worker to have earned a certain amount of wages or to have
worked for a certain period of time (or both) within the base period to be monetarily eligible to
receive any UC benefits. The methods states use to determine monetary eligibility vary greatly.
Most state benefit formulas replace approximately half of a claimant’s average weekly wage up to
a weekly maximum. State taxes paid by employers on UC-covered wages finance UC benefits.
Maximum UC Benefit Duration
Until the recent state law changes described in this report, UC programs had been paying
unemployment benefits for a maximum duration of 26 weeks. The only exceptions to the 26 week
UC benefit maximum prior to these recent state law changes were states that provided more than
26 weeks of UC benefits (Montana: up to 28 weeks; Massachusetts: up to 30 weeks). There is
nothing in federal law, however, that requires states to set their UC benefit duration maximum at
26 weeks. States have the discretion to set their own UC benefit durations via their state UC laws.
In the early decades of the UC program, there was more variation in the maximum duration of
UC benefits across states, which also tended to be lower than 26 weeks. Yet since the 1960s—and
until the 2011 state law changes—states have chosen to provide up to at least 26 weeks of UC
benefits to eligible individuals.5
Emergency Unemployment Compensation Program
On June 30, 2008, the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-252) created a new
temporary, federally financed unemployment insurance program, the EUC08 program. EUC08 is
the eighth, federal temporary program that Congress has created to extend the number of potential
weeks of UC available to eligible, unemployed individuals during an economic slowdown.6 State

4 The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands are considered to be states in UC law.
5 Puerto Rico is an exception to this pattern of state convergence on 26 weeks as the maximum UC benefit duration in
the 1960s. When it originally entered the federal-state UC system in 1961, Puerto Rico provided a lower maximum UC
benefit duration (i.e., up to 16 weeks in 1961 and then up to 20 weeks for most of the 1970-1990 period). Puerto Rico
did not provide up to 26 weeks of UC benefits until 1991. For more information on state UC benefit duration, including
changes over time, see DOL’s “Significant Provisions of State UI Laws,” available at
http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/statelaws.asp#sigprouilaws.
6 The other programs became effective in 1958, 1961, 1972, 1975, 1982, 1991, and 2002. See CRS Report RL34340,
Extending Unemployment Compensation Benefits During Recessions, by Julie M. Whittaker and Katelin P. Isaacs.
Congressional Research Service
2

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

UC agencies administer the EUC08 benefit along with regular UC benefits. EUC08 benefits are
currently financed with general revenue from the U.S. Treasury. The authorization for this
program continues until the week ending on or before January 2, 2013.7 There is no
grandfathering of any EUC08 benefit after that date. Therefore, EUC08 benefits are currently
available through December 29, 2012 (December 30, 2012 for New York).
The EUC08 benefit amount is equal to the eligible individual’s weekly regular UC benefits. There
are four tiers of EUC08 benefits. As authorized under P.L. 112-96, the potential duration of
EUC08 benefits available to eligible individuals varies by calendar date and state unemployment
rate:8
• Tier I is available in all states, up to 20 weeks until September 1, 2012, when the
maximum number of weeks of available benefits decreases to 14 weeks.
• Tier II is available in all states, up to 14 weeks until May 26, 2012. Beginning
May 27, 2012, the state’s total unemployment rate (TUR) must be at least 6% to
have tier II benefits available in the state.9
• Tier III is available in states with a TUR of at least 6% (or an IUR of at least
4%) for up to 13 weeks until May 29, 2012. Beginning May 27, 2012, the state’s
TUR must be at least 7% (or an insured unemployment rate [IUR]10 of at least
4%) to have tier III benefits available in the state. Beginning September 2, 2012,
the maximum number of weeks of UI benefits available in tier III decreases from
13 to 9 weeks.
• Tier IV is available in states with an active EB program and a TUR of at least
8.5% or an IUR of at least 5% until May 26, 2012, for up to 6 weeks. However,
in states that do not have an active EB program and have a TUR of at least 8.5%
(or an IUR of at least 5%), the maximum potential duration is up to 16 weeks.
The 16-week provision for states without an active EB program terminates in
June 2012.
• Beginning May 27, 2012, tier IV benefits are available in a state if that the
state’s TUR is at least 9% (rather than 8.5%) or the IUR is 5% (unchanged).
Thus, for all states meeting the unemployment rate criteria, the maximum
potential duration is up to 6 weeks.
• Beginning September 2, 2012, the maximum potential duration of tier IV
increases to 10 weeks.

7 The EUC08 program has been amended 10 times (P.L. 110-449, P.L. 111-5, P.L. 111-92, P.L. 111-118, P.L. 111-144,
P.L. 111-157, P.L. 111-205, P.L. 111-312, P.L. 112-78, and P.L. 112-96). For more details on EUC08, including its
legislative history, CRS Report R42444, Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08): Current Status of
Benefits, by Julie M. Whittaker and Katelin P. Isaacs.
8 For additional details and special considerations regarding maximum potential weeks of EUC08 benefits available in
state, see CRS Report R42444, Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08): Current Status of Benefits, by Julie
M. Whittaker and Katelin P. Isaacs.
9 The TUR (the total unemployment rate) is the seasonally-adjusted, three-month average of the ratio of unemployed
workers to all workers (employed and unemployed) in the labor market.
10 The IUR (the insured unemployment rate) is the ratio of UC claimants divided by individuals in UC-covered jobs.
Congressional Research Service
3

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Extended Benefit Program
The Federal-State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act of 1970, P.L. 91-373, established
the EB program. The EB program provides extended unemployment benefits in states that meet
certain economic criteria. In all states, EB is available when a state’s IUR or TUR reaches certain
levels.11 For additional details on state triggers for the EB program, see CRS Report RL33362,
Unemployment Insurance: Programs and Benefits, by Julie M. Whittaker and Katelin P. Isaacs.
The EB program imposes additional federal restrictions on individual eligibility for benefits
beyond the state requirements for regular UC. In addition to all state requirements for regular UC
eligibility, the EB program requires claimants to have at least 20 weeks of full-time insured
employment or the equivalent in their base period and to conduct a systematic and sustained work
search. Prior to the enactment of P.L. 112-96, states were permitted to determine which benefit,
EB or EUC08, was paid first.12 P.L. 112-96 now requires that states pay EUC08 benefits before
EB benefits.
Under permanent law, EB benefits are funded half (50%) by the federal government and half
(50%) by states. The 2009 stimulus package (P.L. 111-5), as amended, temporarily changes the
financing of EB benefits to be 100% federal funding through December 31, 2012.13 The EB
benefit amount is equal to the eligible individual’s weekly regular UC benefits.
There are two types of payable periods for EB benefits. First, if it meets certain state economic
criteria and has certain state law trigger options in place,14 a state may pay EB benefits through an
EB Unemployment Period. As discussed below, the duration of an EB Unemployment Period is
based on the duration of regular UC benefits. For most states (i.e., those states with a UC
maximum duration of up to 26 weeks), the EB Unemployment Period may provide up to 13
additional weeks of unemployment benefits to eligible individuals.
Second, a state may pay benefits through an EB High Unemployment Period if that state meets
certain state economic criteria and has certain state law trigger options in place.15 Because the
duration of an EB High Unemployment Period is based on the duration of regular UC benefits in
most states (i.e., those states with a UC maximum duration of up to 26 weeks), up to 20 additional
weeks of EB benefits may be available to eligible individuals.
State Law Changes to UC Benefit Duration
Regular state UC benefits are financed through state payroll taxes on employers. The state
unemployment tax rate on employers in all states is “experience rated,” that is, the state tax rate is
based on the amount of UC paid to former employees. Generally, the more UC benefits paid to its

11 DOL’s weekly trigger notices for the EB program are available online at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/
unemploy/claims_arch.asp.
12 Alaska was the only state to pay EB benefits first when this option was available under P.L. 110-252, as amended.
13 This temporary 100% federal financing of EB benefits does not include “non-sharable” benefits (generally, these are
former state and local employees’ EB benefits).
14 For details on these EB triggers, see report section on “State Law Enactment of EB Trigger Options.”
15 Ibid.
Congressional Research Service
4

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

former employees, the higher the tax rate of the employer, up to a maximum established by
state law.
As a result of the most recent recession and its accompanying prolonged and high unemployment,
states have paid out large amounts of UC benefits ($75.3 billion in FY2009 and $63.0 billion in
FY2010 versus $30.2 billion in FY2006 and $31.4 billion in FY2007).16 This increase in state
expenditures on UC benefits has also led to large outstanding federal loans in many states17 as
well as increased employer tax rates in most states.
In response to similar state UC financial stress following prior recessions, states have typically
reduced the amount of UC benefits paid to individuals through reductions in the maximum
benefit amount or through changes in the underlying benefit calculations. Under current federal
law, however, most states are temporarily prohibited from reducing UC benefit amounts through
changes to benefit calculation18 and, therefore, have acted to reduce UC benefit duration as an
alternative means to decrease total UC benefit payments. Therefore, these state UC benefit
duration reductions are, in part, a response to UC financial crises facing states.
At the same time, however, the duration for current federal unemployment benefits—each tier of
the EUC08 program and any EB periods—are calculated based on state UC benefit duration.
Thus, states that have enacted laws to reduce the duration of regular UC benefits have also
reduced the duration of EUC08 and EB benefits.
Currently, seven states have acted to decrease their maximum UC benefit durations:
• Arkansas decreased its state UC maximum duration from 26 weeks to 25 weeks,
effective March 30, 2011.
• Florida decreased the maximum UC duration from 26 weeks to a variable
maximum duration, depending on the state unemployment rate and ranging from
12 weeks up to 23 weeks. Up to 12 weeks will be available if the state
unemployment rate is 5% or less. Each 0.5% increase in the state unemployment
rate above 5% will add an additional week of UC benefit duration. Finally, up to
23 weeks of regular UC benefits will be available if the state unemployment rate
is at least 10.5%.19 This benefit reduction was effective January 1, 2012.
• Georgia decreased its UC maximum duration from 26 weeks to a variable
maximum duration that ranges between 14 weeks and 20 weeks, depending on
the unemployment rate in the state. A maximum UC duration of 14 weeks will be
available if the state unemployment rate is 6.5% or less. Each 0.5% increase in
the state unemployment rate above 6.5% will add additional weeks of UC benefit

16 For more details on revenues and expenditures associated with UC benefits, see CRS Report RL33362,
Unemployment Insurance: Programs and Benefits, by Julie M. Whittaker and Katelin P. Isaacs.
17 For more details on federal loans to states to pay UC benefits, see CRS Report RS22954, The Unemployment Trust
Fund (UTF): State Insolvency and Federal Loans to States, by Julie M. Whittaker.
18 For a fuller discussion of this issue, including details on two states that have been able to reduce weekly UC benefit
amounts, see the report section on “States with Reduced Weekly Benefit Amounts.”
19 The three-month average, seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for Florida in June 2012 is 8.6%, as determined by
the U.S. Department of Labor.
Congressional Research Service
5

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

duration up to a maximum of 20 weeks of UC benefits if the state unemployment
rate is at least 9%.20 This benefit reduction was effective May 2, 2012.
• Illinois decreased its UC maximum duration from 26 weeks to 25 weeks,
effective January 1, 2012.
• Michigan decreased its UC maximum duration from 26 weeks to 20 weeks. This
change was effective for individuals filing an initial claim for UC benefits on or
after January 15, 2012.
• Missouri decreased its UC maximum duration from 26 weeks to 20 weeks,
effective April 13, 2011.
• South Carolina also decreased its UC maximum duration from 26 weeks to 20
weeks, effective June 14, 2011.
Table 1 also provides details on these state changes to UC benefit duration.
Table 1. States with Unemployment Compensation (UC) Law Changes
That Decrease Benefit Duration
Effective Date of New
State Bill or Act
Prior Maximum
New Maximum
Maximum UC
State
Number
UC Duration
UC Duration
Duration
Arkansas
Act 861, 88th
26 weeks
25 weeks
Effective upon enactment
General Assembly
(March 30, 2011)
Florida Chapter
2011-235,
26 weeks
Variable duration
Effective January 1, 2012
Laws of Florida
based on state
unemployment rate:
(1) 12 weeks if state
unemployment rate
is 5% or below
(2) additional week
added to 12 weeks
for each 0.5%
increase in state
unemployment rate
above 5%
(3) 23 weeks if state
unemployment rate
is at least 10.5%

20 The three-month average, seasonally adjusted unemployment rate for Georgia in June 2012 is 9.0%, as determined
by the U.S. Department of Labor.
Congressional Research Service
6

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Effective Date of New
State Bill or Act
Prior Maximum
New Maximum
Maximum UC
State
Number
UC Duration
UC Duration
Duration
Georgia
Act 710 (House Bill
26 weeks
Variable duration
Effective May 2, 2012
347), Georgia
based on state
General Assembly,
unemployment rate:
2011-2012 Regular
Session
(1) 14 weeks if state
unemployment rate
is 6.5% or below
(2) additional amount
added to 14 weeks
for each 0.5%
increase in state
unemployment rate
above 6.5%
(3) 20 weeks if state
unemployment rate
is at least 9.0%
Illinois
Public Act 097-0001,
26 weeks
25 weeks
Effective January 1, 2012
97th General
Assembly
Michigan
Act No. 14, Public
26 weeks
20 weeks
Effective for individuals
Acts of 2011
filing an initial claim for
UC benefits on or after
January 15, 2012
Missouri
House Bill No. 163,
26 weeks
20 weeks
Effective upon enactment
96th General
(April 13, 2011)
Assembly
South Carolina
Act No. 63, South
26 weeks
20 weeks
Effective upon enactment
Carolina General
(June 14, 2011)
Assembly, 119th
Session
Source: Compiled by the Congressional Research Service.
Consequences of Reduced UC Benefit Duration for Federal
Unemployment Programs
Calculation of Benefit Duration for EUC08 Tiers
The duration of each tier of benefits in the EUC08 program is calculated through a formula based
on state UC benefit duration.21 Therefore, states that have enacted laws to reduce the duration of
regular UC benefits will also experience a reduction in the duration of EUC08 benefits.

21 Under current law, the duration of benefits for each tier of EUC08 (as well as any EB payable period) is set through
calculations based on the lesser of (1) the state benefit criteria, which is a set percentage of the duration of regular UC
benefits (e.g., 80% of the individual’s total regular UC duration in a benefit year for Tier I of EUC08 for the February
19, 2012-September 1, 2012 period) or (2) the maximum weekly amount criteria, which is the multiple of an
individual’s average weekly benefit amount under the UC program (e.g., 20 times an individual’s average weekly
benefit amount in a benefit year for Tier I of EUC08 for the February 19, 2012-September 1, 2012 period). In the event
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
7

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Specific formulas for the duration of each tier of EUC08 are presented below.22 Examples of
adjusted EUC08 benefit durations—based on a weekly benefit amount of $300 and a new
maximum UC duration of 20 weeks—are also provided:23
• Tier I of EUC08
• Duration formula: 80% of the duration of an individual’s total regular UC
benefits in benefit year
• Illustration of adjusted duration (formerly, the unreduced EUC08 tier I
duration would have been up to 20 weeks—based on up to 26 weeks of
unreduced state UC benefits—at a weekly benefit amount of $300)
• 80% of 20 weeks of UC=16 weeks; up to 16 weeks at weekly benefit
amount of $300
• Tier II of EUC08
• Duration formula: 54% of the duration of an individual’s total regular UC
benefits in benefit year
• Illustration of adjusted duration (formerly, up to 14 weeks at $300)
• 54% of 20 weeks of UC=10.8 weeks; up to 10 weeks at weekly benefit
amount of $300 and the last week prorated at $240 ($300/0.8=$240)
• Tier III of EUC08
• Duration formula: 50% of the duration of an individual’s total regular UC
benefits in benefit year
• Illustration of adjusted duration (formerly, up to 13 weeks at $300)
• 50% of 20 weeks of UC=10 weeks; up to 10 weeks at weekly benefit
amount of $300

(...continued)
of state reduction in UC benefit durations, the former calculation—the state benefit criteria—will be lower and, thus,
applicable. Therefore, this report’s discussion of the benefit duration calculation for all tiers of EUC08 and all payable
periods of EB focuses on this state benefit criteria formula in its explanations and illustrations of duration calculations.
22 These EUC08 benefit duration formulas are effective for EUC08 tiers authorized under P.L. 112-96 for February 19,
2012-September 1, 2012 (February 20, 2012-September 2, 2012, for New York). Beginning September 2, 2012
(September 3, 2012, for New York), the duration of EUC08 tiers I, III, and IV are scheduled to change. For more
details, see CRS Report R42444, Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08): Current Status of Benefits, by
Julie M. Whittaker and Katelin P. Isaacs.
23 The average weekly benefit amount is roughly $300 across all states for June 2012 (DOL). Michigan, Missouri, and
South Carolina have enacted state laws to reduce their maximum UC benefit duration to 20 weeks.
Congressional Research Service
8

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

• Tier IV of EUC08
• Duration formula: 24% of the duration of an individual’s total regular UC
benefits in benefit year24
• Illustration of adjusted duration (formerly, up to 6 weeks at $300)
• 24% of 20 weeks of UC=4.8 weeks; up to 4 weeks at weekly benefit
amount of $300 and the last week prorated at $240 ($300/0.8=$240)
EUC08 tier duration calculations for each state that has enacted a reduction in regular UC benefit
duration are provided in Table 2.
Calculation of Benefit Duration for EB Payable Periods
The duration of benefits for the two types of EB payable periods are set through calculations
similar in structure to the calculations for EUC08 tier durations.25 As is the case with the EUC08
program, state reductions in UC benefit durations lead to proportional reductions in the duration
of the EB payable periods.
The EB payable period duration calculations and illustration of adjusted EB durations (using
$300 as the weekly benefit amount and a new UC maximum duration of 20 weeks)26 are below:
• EB Unemployment Period
• Duration formula: 50% of the duration of individual’s total regular UC
benefits in benefit year
• Illustration of adjusted duration (formerly up to 13 weeks at $300)
• 50% of 20 weeks of UC=10 weeks; up to 10 weeks at weekly benefit
amount of $300
• EB High Unemployment Period
• Duration formula: 80% of the duration individual’s total regular UC benefits
in benefit year
• Illustration of adjusted duration (formerly up to 20 weeks at $300)
• 80% of 20 weeks of UC=16 weeks; up to 16 weeks at weekly benefit
amount of $300
Table 2 displays EB payable period duration calculations for each state that has enacted a
reduction in regular UC benefit duration.

24 The duration of tier IV of EUC08 in states that do not have an active EB program and have a TUR of at least 8.5%
(or an IUR of at least 5%) is up to 16 weeks for the period of February 19, 2012-May 26, 2012 (February 20, 2012-May
27, 2012 for New York). For such states during this period, the duration formula for tier IV of EUC08 is 62% of an
individual’s total regular UC benefits in benefit year.
25 See footnote 21 for more technical details.
26 See footnote 23 for rationale behind these data points.
Congressional Research Service
9

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Table 2. Adjusted Maximum EUC08 and EB Benefit Duration Resulting from Changes to State Maximum UC Benefit Duration
Adjusted
Adjusted
Adjusted
Maximum EB
Effective
Benefit
Adjusted
Adjusted
Adjusted
Adjusted
Adjusted
Maximum EB
High
Date for
Duration
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Unemployment Unemployment
Adjusted
Maximum
UC
EUC08 Tier EUC08 Tier EUC08 Tier EUC08 Tier
Period
Period
UC
from All
State
Duration
I Duration
II Duration
III Duration
IV Duration
Duration
Duration
Durations
Programs
Arkansas
25 weeks
20 weeks
13 weeks and
12 weeks and
6 weeks
12 weeks and 1
20 weeks
Effective
97 weeks
1 week at
1 week at
week at
3/31/11
0.5xWBA
0.5xWBA
0.5xWBA
Florida Variable

Effective

duration based
1/1/12
on state
unemployment
rate:

(1) 12 weeks if With 12
With 12
With 12
With 12
With 12 week
With 12 week
With
12
state
week UC
week UC
week UC
week UC
UC duration: 6
UC duration: 9
week UC
unemployment duration: 9
duration: 6
duration: 6
duration: 2
weeks at WBA
weeks at WBA
duration: 46
rate is 5% or
weeks and 1
weeks and 1
weeks
weeks and 1
and 1 week at
weeks and 1
below
week at
week at
week at
0.6xWBA
week at
0.6xWBA
0.48xWBA
0.88xWBA
WBAx0.56
(2) additional
week added to
12 weeks for
each 0.5%
increase in
state
unemployment
rate above 5%

(3) 23 weeks if With 23
With 23
With 23
With 23
With 23 week
With 23 week
With
23
state
week UC
week UC
week UC
week UC
UC duration: 11
UC duration: 18
week UC
unemployment duration: 18
duration: 12
duration: 11
duration: 5
weeks at WBA
weeks at WBA
duration: 89
rate is at least
weeks and 1
weeks and 1
weeks and 1
weeks and 1
and 1 week at
and 1 week at
weeks and I
10.5%
week at
week at
week at
week at
0.5xWBA
0.4xWBA
week at
0.4xWBA
0.42xWBA
0.5xWBA
0.52xWBA
WBAx.0.24
CRS-10

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Adjusted
Adjusted
Adjusted
Maximum EB
Effective
Benefit
Adjusted
Adjusted
Adjusted
Adjusted
Adjusted
Maximum EB
High
Date for
Duration
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Maximum
Unemployment Unemployment
Adjusted
Maximum
UC
EUC08 Tier EUC08 Tier EUC08 Tier EUC08 Tier
Period
Period
UC
from All
State
Duration
I Duration
II Duration
III Duration
IV Duration
Duration
Duration
Durations
Programs
Michigan
20 weeks
16 weeks
10 weeks and
10 weeks
4 weeks and
10 weeks
16 weeks
Effective for
77 weeks and
1 week at
1 week at
individuals
1 week at
0.8xWBA
0.8xWBA
filing initial
0.6xWBA
claims for UC
benefits on or
after 1/15/12
Missouri
20 weeks
16 weeks
10 weeks and
10 weeks
4 weeks and
10 weeks
16 weeks
Effective
77 weeks and
1 week at
1 week at
4/13/11
1 week at
0.8xWBA
0.8xWBA
0.6xWBA
South
20 weeks
16 weeks
10 weeks and
10 weeks
4 weeks and
10 weeks
16 weeks
Effective
77 weeks and
Carolina
1 week at
1 week at
6/14/11
1 week at
0.8xWBA
0.8xWBA
0.6xWBA
Source: Compiled by Congressional Research Service.
Notes: WBA: weekly benefit amount. All weeks of benefits are paid out in terms of ful WBA unless a pro-rated WBA calculation is provided.
The adjusted maximum benefit durations listed in the table for EUC08 and EB (and the maximum duration from al programs, which had previously been 99 weeks) apply to
beneficiaries who file an initial claim for UC benefits after the effective date for adjusted UC durations. Individuals who received or are receiving UC benefits prior to the
effective date for the state reduction in maximum UC benefits maintain the previous, unreduced UC, EUC08, and EB benefit durations.
The EUC08 benefit duration formulas provided in this table are effective for EUC08 tiers authorized under P.L. 112-96 for February 19, 2012-September 1, 2012 (February
20, 2012-September 2, 2012 for New York). Beginning September 2, 2012 (September 3, 2012, for New York), the duration of EUC08 tiers I, III, and IV are scheduled to
change. The duration of tier IV of EUC08 in states that do not have an active EB program and have a TUR of at least 8.5% (or an IUR of at least 5%) is up to 16 weeks for
the period of February 19, 2012-May 26, 2012 (February 20, 2012-May 27, 2012 for New York). For such states during this period, the duration formula for tier IV of
EUC08 is 62% of an individual’s total regular UC benefits in benefit year. For more details, see CRS Report R42444, Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC08): Current
Status of Benefits, by Julie M. Whittaker and Katelin P. Isaacs.
Under current law, the authorization for the EUC08 program expires the week ending on or before January 2, 2013. Consequently, EUC08 benefits are available through
December 29, 2012 (December 30, 2012 for New York).
CRS-12

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

States with Reduced Weekly Benefit Amounts
P.L. 110-252, as amended, temporarily prevents states from actively changing the method of
calculation of the UC weekly benefit amount in such a way as to decrease this average weekly
benefit amount. This “nonreduction” rule is a condition of the EUC08 federal-state agreement. In
general, states are not permitted to pay an average weekly UC benefit amount that is less than
what would have been paid under state law prior to what was in effect as of June 2, 2010.27
However, states may reduce weekly benefits if that reduction happens automatically in certain
circumstances as required by a state law that was in place before the enactment of P.L. 111-5.
In addition, P.L. 112-96 provides an exception to this UC “nonreduction” rule in the case of state
legislation that was enacted before March 1, 2012. States that made changes to the regular UC
benefit amount prior to March 1, 2012, are not subject to the “nonreduction” rule.
Prior to P.L. 110-252, 36 states had enacted state laws that calculate the maximum weekly UC
benefit via automatic adjustments based on the average weekly wage in a state.28 Therefore, if the
average weekly wage declines in these states, they may experience automatic reductions in UC
average weekly benefit amount, which are permitted under the “nonreduction” rule. For instance,
in 2011, New Jersey and Oklahoma appear to have met these conditions and to have experienced
automatic reductions in their state UC weekly benefit amount. Similarly, in 2012, Hawaii also
seems to have met the necessary conditions to automatically reduce the state UC weekly benefit
amount.29
These state UC benefit reductions also reduce weekly amounts for EUC08 and EB benefits,
which are paid out in the same amount. Only individuals filing new state UC claims after the
effective date for reduced UC durations, however, would experience reductions in UC, EUC08, or
EB benefits.

27 The current “nonreduction” rule was put into place when P.L. 111-205 amended P.L. 110-252. There was a similar,
but programmatically distinct “nonreduction” rule in P.L. 111-5, as amended, which prevented states from actively
changing the method of calculation of the UC weekly benefit amount to pay UC benefit amounts less than what would
have been paid under state law prior to December 31, 2008. No states acted to decrease UC benefit amounts between
December 31, 2008, and June 2, 2010, when the federal authorization for this earlier “nonreduction” rule expired.
28 The 36 states that calculate benefit amounts using automatic adjustments under prior state law are Arkansas,
Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio,
Oklahoma Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Vermont,
Virgin Islands, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
These 36 states could experience reductions in UC weekly benefit amounts under the “nonreduction” rule if (1) the
average weekly wages in states declined and the corresponding methods of calculation formula resulted in a benefit
decrease (for specific information regarding these state-specific methods of benefit calculation, see DOL’s
“Comparison of State Unemployment Laws,” Chapter 3: Monetary Eligibility, Table 3.6, pp. 13-15, available at
http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/unemploy/pdf/uilawcompar/2011/monetary.pdf) and (2) the state did not
otherwise prevent this benefit amount reduction through enactment of new state legislation.
29 See DOL’s “Significant Provisions of State UI Laws,” available at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/
unemploy/statelaws.asp.
Congressional Research Service
13

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

State Law Enactment of EB Trigger Options
The EB program is active (“triggered on”) and pays unemployment benefits when a state’s
insured unemployment rate (IUR)30 or total unemployment rate (TUR)31 reaches certain levels.
All states must pay up to 13 weeks of EB if the IUR for the previous 13 weeks is at least 5% and
is 120% of the average of the rates for the same 13-week period in each of the 2 previous years (a
2-year lookback). There are two other optional thresholds that states may choose. (States may
choose one, two, or none.) If the state has chosen a given option, they would provide the
following:
• Option 1: an additional 13 weeks of benefits if the state’s IUR is at least 6%,
regardless of previous years’ averages.
• Option 2: an additional 13 weeks of benefits if the state’s TUR is at least 6.5%
and is at least 110% of the state’s average TUR for the same 13 weeks in either of
the previous two years; an additional 20 weeks of benefits if the TUR is at least
8% and is at least 110% of the state’s average TUR for the same 13 weeks in
either of the previous two years.
In addition to the optional EB triggers themselves, P.L. 111-312 (signed December 17, 2010)
made technical changes to certain triggers in the EB program. P.L. 111-312, as amended, allows
states to temporarily use lookback calculations based on three years of unemployment rate data
(rather than the current lookback of two years of data) as part of their mandatory IUR and
optional TUR triggers if states would otherwise trigger off or not be on a period of EB benefits.
Using a two-year versus a three-year EB trigger lookback is an important adjustment because
some states are likely to trigger off their EB periods in the near future despite high, sustained—
but not increasing—unemployment rates.
For states to implement EB trigger lookback changes, each state had to individually opt to amend
its state UC laws. These state law changes must be written in such a way that if the two-year
lookback has the effect that the state would have an active EB program, no action would be taken.
But if a two-year lookback is not effective as part of an EB trigger and the state is not triggered
on to an EB period, then the state would be able to use a three-year lookback. This temporary
option to use three-year EB trigger lookbacks expires the week on or before December 31, 2012.
Currently, 11 states have adopted the optional TUR EB trigger (i.e., Option 2 above) into
permanent state law:
• Alaska, Connecticut, Kansas, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North
Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington

30 The IUR is the ratio of UC claimants divided by individuals in UC-covered jobs. The IUR excludes several important
groups: self-employed workers, unpaid family workers, workers in certain not-for-profit organizations, and several
other, primarily seasonal, categories of workers. In addition to those unemployed workers whose last jobs were in the
excluded employment, the insured unemployed rate excludes the following: those who have exhausted their UC
benefits (even if they receive EB or EUC08 benefits); new entrants or reentrants to the labor force; disqualified workers
whose unemployment is considered to have resulted from their own actions rather than from economic conditions; and,
eligible unemployed persons who do not file for benefits.
31 The TUR is the ratio of unemployed workers to all workers (employed and unemployed) in the labor market. The
TUR is essentially a weekly version of the unemployment rate published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and based
on data from the BLS’ monthly Current Population Survey.
Congressional Research Service
14

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

In addition, 28 states have temporarily adopted the TUR trigger into state law, linking the
expiration of this optional EB trigger to the expiration of the 100% federal financing of EB,
which is currently authorized through December 31, 2012 (under P.L. 112-96):32,
• Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, District of Columbia,
Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and
Wisconsin
As of April 1, 2012, there are 33 states that have enacted a three-year EB trigger lookback option
(as temporarily authorized until the week ending on or before December 31, 2012, under P.L.
111-312, as amended most recently by P.L. 112-96):
• Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia,
Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New York,
North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin
With few exceptions, only states that enacted the TUR trigger (in either permanent or temporary
law) and also enacted the temporary three-year lookback had an active EB program paying
benefits throughout 2011 and 2012. As of the week of August 12, 2012, however, no state meets
the EB trigger criteria under “Option 2”—TUR trigger and three-year lookback—to be able to
pay EB benefits. Future increases in state unemployment rates and/or a reversal of the current
trend of decreasing unemployment rates would be required in order to trigger on EB based on the
TUR trigger and lookback requirement.
Table 3 compiles enactment information for all three EB trigger options described above by state.
Table 3. Extended Benefit (EB) Trigger Components Enacted by States
Permanent TUR
Temporary TUR
State
Trigger
Trigger Three-Year
Lookback
Alabama
X
X
Alaska X

Arizona
X

Arkansas

California
X
X
Colorado
X
X
Connecticut X X
Delaware
X
X
District of Columbia

X
X

32 Under permanent law (P.L. 91-373), EB benefits are funded half (50%) by the federal government and half (50%) by
states. The 2009 stimulus package (P.L. 111-5), as amended, temporarily changes the financing of EB benefits to be
100% federal funding until December 31, 2012.
Congressional Research Service
15

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Permanent TUR
Temporary TUR
State
Trigger
Trigger Three-Year
Lookback
Florida
X
X
Georgia
X
X
Hawaii

Idaho
X
X
Illinois
X
X
Indiana
X
X
Iowa

Kansas X

X
Kentucky
X
X
Louisiana

Maine
X
X
Maryland
X
X

Massachusetts X X
Michigan
X
X
Minnesota X X
Mississippi
Missouri
X
X
Montana

Nebraska

Nevada
X
X
New Hampshire
X

New Jersey
X

New Mexico

X
X
New York

X
X
North Carolina
X

X
North Dakota

Ohio
X
X
Oklahoma
Oregon X

X
Pennsylvania X X
Puerto Rico

Rhode Island
X

X
South Carolina

X
X
South Dakota

Tennessee X
X
Texas
X
X
Congressional Research Service
16

UI: Consequences of Changes in State Unemployment Compensation Laws

Permanent TUR
Temporary TUR
State
Trigger
Trigger Three-Year
Lookback
Utah

Vermont X

Virgin Islands

Virginia
X

Washington X X
West Virginia

X
X
Wisconsin
X
X
Wyoming
Total Number of
11 28 33
States with EB
Trigger Component
Source: Compiled by Congressional Research Service based on U.S. Department of Labor, Extended Benefit
Trigger Notice No. 2012-11, effective April 1, 2012 (available at http://www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/
unemploy/trigger/2012/trig_040112.html).

Congressional Research Service
17