Sexual Abuse of Children: 
Federal Criminal Offenses 
Richard M. Thompson II 
Legislative Attorney 
July 13, 2012 
Congressional Research Service 
7-5700 
www.crs.gov 
R42132 
CRS Report for Congress
Pr
  epared for Members and Committees of Congress        
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
Summary 
Over the past 100 years, Congress has sought to prohibit acts of sexual abuse of minors and 
punish those who harm the nation’s children. These efforts began in the early 20th century when 
Congress prohibited the transportation of a minor in interstate commerce for the purpose of 
sexual exploitation, and continue to more modern measures such as outlawing the use of the 
Internet to lure children for sexual purposes. Nevertheless, Congress’s power in this area does 
have constitutional limits. 
The power to create criminal laws in the United States resides most broadly with the states. The 
states retain a general police power to regulate for the health, safety, and welfare of their citizens. 
By contrast, Congress may only act within its express and implied powers, including the power to 
legislate for federal enclaves and in areas within its enumerated powers (e.g., commerce, 
spending, taxing). Congress has exercised both strands of authority to criminalize sexual abuse of 
children. 
Congress began outlawing sexual abuse of minors in 1910 with the Mann Act, which outlawed 
the use of a common carrier to transport a minor in interstate commerce for an illegal sexual 
purpose. In subsequent enactments, including the Sexual Exploitation of Children Act of 1977, 
the Sexual Abuse Act of 1986, and the Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998, 
Congress increased penalty provisions (including repeat offender provisions), expanded 
jurisdictional clauses, and broadened the list of prohibited acts, including aggravating factors 
warranting an increased penalty.  
Presently, federal sexual abuse law is a hierarchy based on the age of the victim and whether the 
act involved aggravating circumstances. The most serious offense is when a child is murdered 
during the commission of a sexual offense. The penalty is death or up to life imprisonment. The 
least serious is sexual contact (as opposed to a sexual act) with a minor at least 12 years of age 
but younger than 16. This crime requires no aggravating circumstances and carries a possible 
four-year maximum prison sentence. Between these two crimes falls a host of other offenses 
prohibiting sexual abuse or contact. These include sexual abuse of a child at least 12 years of age 
but younger than 16, sexual contact with a child under the age of 12 years, and use of the mail or 
other facility of interstate commerce to persuade a minor under the age of 18 to engage in an 
illegal sexual act. 
Because much of the prohibited conduct in these statutes overlaps, courts must consider the 
lesser-included offense doctrine when handling sexual abuse cases. This doctrine permits a court 
to instruct the jury on not only the offense charged by the government, but also a lesser offense 
that is “necessarily included” in the charged offense. This doctrine has been used to aid the 
prosecution in obtaining a conviction when proof of the charged offense is insufficient, but also 
assists defendants by allowing the jury to convict on the lesser included offense. 
 
Congressional Research Service 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
Contents 
Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 1 
Limits of Federal Authority to Punish Local Criminal Acts ............................................................ 1 
Child Abuse Reporting Laws........................................................................................................... 3 
Overview of Federal Child Sexual Abuse Laws .............................................................................. 4 
Specific Federal Offenses ................................................................................................................ 7 
Aggravated Sexual Abuse of Children ...................................................................................... 7 
Abusive Sexual Contact with Minor or Ward............................................................................ 8 
Sexual Abuse of Child at Least 12 Years of Age but Younger than 16.................................... 10 
Illegal Sexual Activity in Interstate Commerce....................................................................... 10 
Other Sections Relating to Sexual Abuse................................................................................ 11 
Lesser Included Offenses for Child Sexual Abuse Crimes ............................................................ 11 
 
Appendixes 
Appendix. Federal Child Sexual Abuse Laws ............................................................................... 13 
 
Contacts 
Author Contact Information........................................................................................................... 15 
 
Congressional Research Service 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
Introduction 
Prompted by reported cases of child sexual abuse, Congress periodically evaluates whether 
federal law adequately protects the nation’s children from sexual abuse and properly punishes 
those who seek to harm them. Congress has passed many criminal laws that prohibit acts such as 
aggravated sexual abuse of a minor, sexual contact with a minor, and transporting minors across 
state lines with the intent to commit sexual acts. Congress’s power to outlaw sexual abuse, 
however, is not limitless. The federal government may only proscribe abuse when it occurs in a 
federal enclave (a statutorily and constitutionally defined federal territorial jurisdiction) or is 
within Congress’s enumerated powers, such as commerce, taxing, or spending, or its implied 
powers (those arising from the necessary and proper clause). 
To clarify at the outset, this report does not cover issues such as sex offender registration and 
grant programs covered under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006,1 and 
only generally discusses programs for reporting child abuse under the Child Abuse Prevention 
and Treatment Act.2 Those issues are covered comprehensively in other CRS reports.3  
Instead, this report focuses on a narrow subset of substantive criminal offenses that outlaw and 
punish sexual abuse of children, and certain procedural aspects under these laws. First, the report 
will briefly discuss the federal government’s authority (as opposed to state authority) to enact 
criminal laws. Next, it will briefly discuss child abuse reporting requirements under the Child 
Abuse Prevention Treatment Act. Third, it will provide a general overview of the various laws 
Congress has passed to address sexual abuse of children, including the Sexual Abuse Act of 
1986,4 the Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996,5 and the Protection of Children from 
Sexual Predators Act of 1998.6 Fourth, it will take an in-depth look at each sexual abuse offense, 
including its substantive elements, potential punishments, and procedural aspects. Finally, this 
report includes an Appendix that lists federal child sexual abuse crimes, including each 
prohibited act, its jurisdictional clause, its punishment, and its statute of limitations. 
Limits of Federal Authority to Punish 
Local Criminal Acts 
The power to create criminal laws in the United States rests with both the federal and state 
governments. Under this system of dual sovereigns, the “States possess primary authority for 
defining and enforcing the criminal law.”7 They have retained “inherent police power,”8 meaning 
                                                 
1 Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, P.L. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (2006). 
2 Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, P.L. 93-247, 88 Stat. 4 (1974). 
3 CRS Report RL33967, Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act: A Legal Analysis, by Charles Doyle; CRS 
Report R40899, The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA): Background, Programs, and Funding, by 
Emilie Stoltzfus. 
4 Sexual Abuse Act of 1986, P.L. 99-646, §87, 100 Stat. 3592, 3620. 
5 Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996, P.L. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009, 3009-031. 
6 Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998, P.L. 105-314, 112 Stat. 2974. 
7 United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 561 n.3 (1995) (quoting Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 635 (1993)); see 
also Screws v. United States, 325 U.S. 91, 109 (1945) (plurality opinion) (“Our national government is one of 
(continued...) 
Congressional Research Service 
1 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
the power to legislate for the “health, safety, and morals” of the citizenry.9 The federal 
government, on the other hand, is allocated a more limited role. The Constitution does not grant it 
a broad police power to outlaw local acts generally, but instead confines its authority to a limited 
bundle of powers, both express and implied.10 Nonetheless, the federal government does have 
power to create and enforce criminal laws under both its territorial and enumerated powers. 
Respecting its territorial power, Congress can criminalize acts that occur within certain federal 
enclaves—those areas carved out by the Constitution for congressional administration. These 
include the District of Columbia,11 territories of the United States,12 and land purchased by the 
federal government from the states.13 Also, with this power, Congress has created a host of 
offenses applicable to the “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”14 
This area includes the high seas, any land acquired by the United States from one of the several 
states or land generally reserved or acquired by the United States, military posts, and crimes 
occurring on an aircraft while in-flight over the high seas and out of the jurisdiction of the several 
states.15  
Congress can also criminalize acts that occur within the states if the desired prohibition is within 
its enumerated powers. These powers include the commerce clause, the spending power, and the 
taxing power.16 Under its power “[t]o regulate Commerce ... among the several States,”17 
Congress can regulate three broad categories: (1) the use of the channels of interstate commerce, 
(2) instrumentalities, or persons or things in interstate commerce, and (3) activities that have a 
substantial effect on interstate commerce.18 Congress has employed the first and second 
categories to outlaw crimes occurring in interstate commerce including domestic violence,19 
stalking,20 and child sexual abuse.21 
                                                                  
(...continued) 
delegated powers alone. Under our federal system the administration of justice rests with the States except as Congress, 
acting within the scope of those delegated powers, has created offenses against the United States.”).  
8 Newberry v. United States, 256 U.S. 232, 258 (1921). 
9 Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560, 569 (1991). 
10 1 WAYNE R. LAFAVE, SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW §4.2(a) (2d ed. 2003). Congress’s implied powers derive from 
the necessary and proper clause. U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl. 18 (“The Congress shall have Power ... To make all Laws 
which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers....”). 
11 “The Congress shall have Power ... To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not 
exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat 
of the Government of the United States....” U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl. 17. 
12 “The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or 
other Property belonging to the United States....” U.S. CONST. art. IV, §3.  
13 “The Congress shall have Power ... To exercise exclusive Legislation ... over all places purchased by the Consent of 
the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and 
other needful Buildings.” U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl. 17. 
14 18 U.S.C. §7 (2006). 
15 Id. 
16 LaFave, supra note 10. 
17 U.S. CONST. art. I, §8, cl. 3. 
18 See United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 558-59 (1995); United States v. Morrison 529 U.S. 598, 608-09. 
19 18 U.S.C. §2261 (2006). 
20 18 U.S.C. §2261A (2006). 
21 18 U.S.C. §2241(c) (2006). 
Congressional Research Service 
2 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
While Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause is broad, it is not without limits. In United 
States v. Lopez, the Court held that a provision of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 that 
prohibited possession of a firearm in a school zone, was beyond Congress’s commerce power 
because the “Act neither regulate[d] a commercial activity nor containe[d] a requirement that the 
possession be connected in any way to interstate commerce” (sometimes referred to as a 
“jurisdictional hook”).22 But 10 years later in Gonzales v. Raich, the Court upheld a provision of 
the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) that prohibited a person from possessing, obtaining, or 
manufacturing marijuana for medical use.23 The Court sustained this use of Congress’s power to 
regulate a wholly intrastate activity because the CSA was part of a “larger scheme” designed to 
regulate an act that “in the aggregate, substantially affect[ed] interstate commerce.”24 
Under its spending power, Congress has conditioned receipt of federal money by states upon their 
passage of criminal statutes.25 Describing this process, the Court stated that “legislation enacted 
pursuant to the spending power is much in the nature of a contract: in return for federal funds, the 
States agree to comply with federally imposed conditions.”26 The Court upheld in South Dakota v. 
Dole Congress’s condition of state receipt of highway funds upon the states passage of a 21-year 
old minimum drinking age.27 In the child sexual abuse context, Congress conditioned law 
enforcement funds to the states upon the state’s passage of Megan’s Law,28 which required states 
to release information to the public about convicted sex offenders.29  
Exercising both its territorial power in the federal enclaves, and its express and implied powers 
under its Article I commerce and spending powers, Congress has criminalized certain acts of 
sexual abuse towards children. 
Child Abuse Reporting Laws 
Though not a focal point of this report, it is necessary to briefly discuss child abuse reporting 
laws. In 1974, Congress enacted the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA)30 to 
establish procedures for the “prevention, identification, and treatment of child abuse and 
neglect.”31 Among other provisions, CAPTA created a uniform definition for child abuse and 
established minimum child abuse reporting standards the states were required to institute as a 
condition of receiving grant funds.32 All fifty states have enacted definitions that meet CAPTA’s 
                                                 
22 Lopez, 514 U.S. at 551. 
23 Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 22 (1995). 
24 Id. 
25 See generally KENNETH THOMAS, CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE, UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION: ANALYSIS 
AND INTERPRETATION 165 (2002), available at http://crs.gov/conan/default.aspx?mode=topic&doc=Article01.xml&t=
3|1|2&s=8&c=1. 
26 Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 451 U.S. 1, 17 (1981).  
27 South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203, 211 (1987). 
28 Megan’s Law, P.L. 104-145, 110 Stat. 1345 (1996). 
29 See W. Paul. Koenig, Does Congress Abuse Its Spending Clause Power By Attaching Conditions on the Receipt of 
Federal Law Enforcement Funds to a State’s Compliance with “Megan’s Law”?, 88 J. CRIM. L. & CRIMINOLOGY 721, 
729-30 (1998). 
30 Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, P.L. 93-247, 88 Stat. 4 (1974). 
31 S.Rept. 93-308, at 1 (1973). 
Congressional Research Service 
3 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
minimum definition of “child abuse,” while some states have exercised their discretion to expand 
on CAPTA’s definition.33  
In addition to CAPTA, Congress enacted as Title II of the Crime Control Act of 1990, the Victims 
of Child Abuse Act,34 which extended mandatory reporting requirements to “covered 
professionals” while engaged in their work on “[f]ederal land or in a federally operated (or 
contracted) facility.”35 A person who fails to report an act of child abuse under this act is subject 
to fines and imprisonment of not more than one year.36 
Overview of Federal Child Sexual Abuse Laws 
Although Congress’s role in the field of criminal law is limited, it has made an effort to target 
sexual abuse, with an emphasis on sexual abuse of children, a “particularly vulnerable section of 
our society.”37 Congress’s movement to prohibit the sexual exploitation of minors began in 1910 
with the White Slave Traffic Act or “Mann Act.”38 This act outlawed a person from inducing or 
enticing a female under the age of 18 to engage in “prostitution, debauchery, or any other 
immoral practice” while knowingly causing her to be transported in interstate commerce upon a 
common carrier.39 This law was later expanded by the Sexual Exploitation of Children Act of 
1977, which prohibited the transportation of any minor (making the offense gender neutral) in 
interstate commerce or within the District of Columbia or a territory of the United States, with the 
intent that the minor engage in prostitution or in prohibited sexual conduct if that person knew or 
had reason to know that such conduct would be commercially exploited.40 
                                                                  
(...continued) 
32 See CRS Report R40899, The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA): Background, Programs, and 
Funding, by Emilie Stoltzfus. 
33 Child Welfare Information Gateway, Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect: Summary of State Laws, 
U.S. DEP’T OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, http://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/
manda.cfm. “Child abuse and neglect” was defined under CAPTA as “the physical or mental injury, sexual abuse, 
negligent treatment, or maltreatment of a child under the age of eighteen by a person who is responsible for the child’s 
welfare under circumstances which indicate the child’s health or welfare is harmed or threatened thereby, as 
determined in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary.” §3, 88 Stat. at 5. “Child abuse” was amended 
(to its present form) to mean “any recent act or failure to act on the part of a parent or caretaker, which results in death, 
serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse or exploitation, or an act or failure to act which presents an imminent 
risk of serious harm.” 42 U.S.C. §5101 (2006). 
34 Victim’s of Child Abuse Act, P.L. 101-647, §201, 104 Stat. 4789, 4806 (1990). 
35 42 U.S.C. §13031 (2006). 
36 18 U.S.C. §2258 (2006). 
37 Hearings on Federal Rape Reform Law Before the Subcomm. on Criminal Justice of the H. Comm. on the Judiciary, 
98th Cong. 80 (1984) (statement of Rep. Steny Hoyer). 
38 White Slave Traffic Act, ch. 395, §4, 36 Stat. 825, 826 (1910). The Mann Act outlawed a person from enticing or 
coercing any female under the age of 18 to engage in “prostitution, debauchery, or any other immoral practice” while 
knowingly causing her to be transported in interstate commerce upon a common carrier. Id. 
39 White Slave Traffic Act, ch. 395, §4, 36 Stat. 825, 826 (1910). 
40 Sexual Exploitation of Children Act of 1977, P.L. 95-225, §3(a), 92 Stat. 7, 8 (codified at 18 U.S.C. §2423). The 
Child Sexual Abuse and Pornography Act of 1986, P.L. 99-628, §5, 100 Stat. 3510, 3511, amended the requirement 
that the prohibited sexual conduct “be commercially exploited,” to its current form, which requires that the minor 
engage in sexual activity “for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.” 18 U.S.C. §2423(a) (2006). 
Congressional Research Service 
4 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
Then in 1986, in an effort to “modernize and reform Federal rape statutes” and “protect[] children 
of very tender years,” Congress enacted the Sexual Abuse Act of 1986.41 This act added a new 
chapter to Title 18 entitled “Sexual Abuse” and contained five new sections creating sexual abuse 
offenses within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or a federal 
prison. Of these five, several targeted sexual abuse of children, including aggravated sexual abuse 
of a child under the age of 12 years and sexual abuse of a minor at least 12 years of age but 
younger than 16.42 This act is tiered, in that the seriousness of the offenses escalates depending on 
whether the defendant engaged in a “sexual act” or “sexual contact” and whether there are 
aggravating factors present.43 The greatest offense is contained in Section 2241 (aggravated 
sexual abuse), which requires a sexual act coupled with serious aggravating circumstances.44 Also 
requiring a sexual act but with less serious aggravating factors are Sections 2242 (sexual abuse) 
and 2243 (sexual abuse of a minor or ward).45 Finally, the least serious is Section 2244 (abusive 
sexual contact), which requires sexual contact, and not a sexual act.46 
The offenses created under the Sexual Abuse Act, however, were limited to crimes occurring in 
the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States or in a federal prison.47 Seeking 
to expand the reach of these statutes, Congress passed the Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act 
of 1996, which, among other provisions, broadened existing statutes to cover crimes that occurred 
not only in the federal enclaves, but also when the defendant crossed state lines.48 Also enacted 
that year as part of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, Congress made it unlawful to use 
the mail or other facility of interstate commerce or within the defined federal jurisdiction to 
persuade a minor under 18 years of age to engage in sexual activity if that act constituted a 
criminal offense.49  
Two years later Congress passed the Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998, 
which increased the penalties for several sexual abuse offenses including sexual abuse of a child 
under the age of 12 years and also added a repeat offender penalty.50 Previously, 18 U.S.C. 
Section 2244 (abusive sexual contact) did not expressly distinguish between adult and child 
victims in setting maximum penalties for violations of it.51 This act amended Section 2244 to add 
a separate penalty provision, doubling the sentence if the victim of the abusive sexual contact is 
under the age of 12.52 For example, under Section 2244(a)(1) a person can receive up to 10 years 
imprisonment for abusive sexual contact regardless of the victim’s age.53 Under the amended 
version, the same abusive sexual contact of a child under the age of 12 may receive 20 years.54 
                                                 
41 Sexual Abuse Act of 1986, P.L. 99-646, §87, 100 Stat. 3592, 3620; H.Rept. 99-594, at 6, 15 (1986). 
42 18 U.S.C. §2241(c) (2006); 18 U.S.C. §2243(a) (2006). 
43 3-61 MODERN FEDERAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL P 61.01 cmt. (2011). 
44 Id. 
45 18 U.S.C. §§2242-43 (2006). 
46 18 U.S.C. §2244 (2006). 
47 Sexual Abuse Act of 1986 §87. 
48 Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996, P.L. 104-208, §121(7), 110 Stat. 3009, 3009-31. 
49 Communications Decency Act of 1996, P.L. 104-104, §508, 110 Stat. 133, 137. 
50 Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998, P.L. 105-314, 112 Stat. 2974. 
51 18 U.S.C. §2244 (1994). 
52 18 U.S.C. §2244(c). 
53 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1). 
54 18 U.S.C. §2244(c) (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1)). 
Congressional Research Service 
5 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
This act increased the penalty from a maximum of 10 years to a maximum of 15 years under both 
Section 2422(b) (using the mail or other facilities of interstate commerce or within a federal 
enclave to coerce or entice a minor under the age of 18 to engage in illegal sexual activity) and 
Section 2423(a) (transporting a minor in interstate commerce with the intent to engage in illegal 
sexual activity).55 This law also doubled the prison sentence for repeat offenders who committed 
a sexual abuse offense found in Chapter 109A of Title 18.56 Finally, this law made it a crime to 
use the mail or other facility of interstate commerce to transmit personal information about a 
minor under the age of 16 with the intent to entice or encourage any person to engage in any 
sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a crime.57 
In 2003, Congress enacted the PROTECT Act, increasing the minimum and maximum penalty for 
several sexual abuse offenses.58 The minimum penalties under Section 2422(b) (coercing or 
enticing a minor under the age of 18 to engage in an illegal sexual act) and Section 2423(a) 
(transporting a minor in interstate commerce with intent to engage in illegal sexual activity) were 
set at five years and the maximum penalties were increased from 15 to 30 years.59 The PROTECT 
Act also created the “Two Strikes You’re Out” section,60 which requires a sentence of life 
imprisonment if a person is convicted of a “federal sex offense”61 and had a “prior sex 
conviction.”62 
Finally, Congress enacted the Adam Walsh Protection and Safety Act in 2006, which, in addition 
to establishing a system of sex offender registration, increased the terms of imprisonment of 
existing offenses.63 As an example of the increased sentences for sexual abuse of a child, Section 
                                                 
55 §§102-3, 112 Stat. at 2975. 
56 18 U.S.C. §2426 (2006). 
57 18 U.S.C. §2425 (2006). 
58 Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003 (PROTECT Act), 
P.L. 108-21, 117 Stat. 650. 
59 Id. §103, 117 Stat. at 652. 
60 Id. §106, 117 Stat. at 654. 
61 “Federal sex offense” is defined as “an offense under section 1591 (relating to sex trafficking of children), 2241 
(relating to aggravated sexual abuse), 2242 (relating to sexual abuse), 2244(a)(1) (relating to abusive sexual contact), 
2245 (relating to sexual abuse resulting in death), 2251 (relating to sexual exploitation of children), 2251A (relating to 
selling or buying of children), 2422(b) (relating to coercion or enticement of a minor into prostitution), or 2423(b) 
(relating to transportation of minors)[.]” 18 U.S.C. §3559(e)(2)(A) (2006). 
62 “Prior sex conviction” is defined as “a conviction for which the sentence was imposed before the conduct occurred 
constituting the subsequent Federal sex offense, and which was for a Federal sex offense or a State sex offense[.]” 18 
U.S.C. §3559(e)(2)(C). “State sex offense” is defined as 
an offense under State law that is punishable by more than one year in prison and consists of 
conduct that would be a Federal sex offense if, to the extent or in the manner specified in the 
applicable provision of this title— 
(i) the offense involved interstate or foreign commerce, or the use of the mails; or 
(ii) the conduct occurred in any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, 
within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in a Federal prison, 
on any land or building owned by, leased to, or otherwise used by or under the control of the 
Government of the United States, or in the Indian country (as defined in Section 1151)[.] 
18 U.S.C. §3559(e)(2)(B). 
Though beyond the scope of this report, there are specific sections of the United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual 
relating to sexual abuse of children. See U.S. SENTENCING GUIDELINES MANUAL §2A3.1 (2011); see generally CRS 
Report R41696, How the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Work: An Overview, by Charles Doyle. 
63 Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, P.L. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (2006). 
Congressional Research Service 
6 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
204 of the act increased the sentence for transporting a minor in interstate commerce for sexual 
activity from five to 30 years to 10 years to life.64 Likewise, the offense of aggravated sexual 
abuse was increased from any term of years to a minimum of 30 years to life.65 
Specific Federal Offenses  
As shown above, Congress’s efforts to combat the sexual exploitation and abuse of minors spans 
from 1910 with the Mann Act, which prohibited enticing minors to travel on a common carrier in 
interstate commerce for illegal sexual purposes, to more modern laws that prohibit the use of the 
Internet to entice minors to engage in sexual acts. At each point, Congress has sought to 
modernize and expand the laws to better effectuate its goals of preventing child abuse and 
punishing those who engage in it. Such changes include stronger penalty provisions (including 
repeat offender provisions), extension of jurisdictional clauses, and expansion of the acts 
prohibited under the laws. This section explores current federal offenses (as opposed to a 
historical review) pertaining to child sexual abuse. 
Aggravated Sexual Abuse of Children 
Enacted as part of the Sexual Abuse Act of 1986,66 and amended multiple times since, 18 U.S.C. 
Section 2241(c) outlaws two categories of aggravated sexual abuse of children. The first category 
prohibits a person from committing aggravated sexual abuse of a child under the age of 12. This 
section has two alternative jurisdictional elements: the first requires interstate travel and the 
second requires the act be committed in a federal jurisdiction. Specifically, the first offense makes 
it unlawful to cross a state line with the intent to engage in a sexual act with a child under the age 
of 12 and either commit or attempt to commit the sexual act.67 Similarly, the second offense 
prohibits a person from committing or attempting to commit a sexual act on a child under the age 
of 12 while in the territorial or special maritime jurisdiction of the United States or in a federally 
run or contracted prison.68 
The second category under Section 2241(c) prohibits aggravated sexual abuse of a minor at least 
12 years of age but younger than 16 while in the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the 
                                                 
64 §204, 120 Stat. at 613, 18 U.S.C. §2423(a) (2006). 
65 §206, 120 Stat. at 613, 18 U.S.C. §2241(c) (2006). 
66 Sexual Abuse Act of 1986, P.L. 99-646, §87, 100 Stat. 3592, 3620. 
67 18 U.S.C. 2241(c); United States v. Cryar, 232 F.3d 1318, 1322 (10th Cir. 2000); United States v. King, 604 F.3d 
125, 139 (3d Cir. 2010). “Sexual act” is defined as 
(A) contact between the penis and the vulva or the penis and the anus, and for purposes of this 
subparagraph contact involving the penis occurs upon penetration, however slight; 
(B) contact between the mouth and the penis, the mouth and the vulva, or the mouth and the anus; 
(C) the penetration, however slight, of the anal or genital opening of another by a hand or finger or 
by any object, with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual 
desire of any person; or 
(D) the intentional touching, not through the clothing, of the genitalia of another person who has 
not attained the age of 16 years with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or 
gratify the sexual desire of any person. 
18 U.S.C.§2246(2) (2006). 
68 18 U.S.C. §2241(c); see 3-61 MODERN FEDERAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS-CRIMINAL P 61.02 cmt. (2011). 
Congressional Research Service 
7 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
United States, or in a federally run or contracted prison. This category can be further divided into 
three subcategories. First, it is unlawful to knowingly cause a minor to engage in a sexual act by 
the use of force or “threatening or placing that other person in fear that any person will be 
subjected to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping,” if the child is at least four years younger 
than the offender.69 Second, it is unlawful to render a minor unconscious and engage in a sexual 
act with that minor.70 Third, Section 2241(c) prohibits a person from administering a drug to a 
minor through the use of force, threat of force, or without the minor’s knowledge, which 
substantially impairs that minor’s ability to apprise or control her conduct, and then engaging in a 
sexual act with that minor.71 An attempt to commit any of these three crimes is sufficient for a 
conviction under Section 2241(c).  
In addition to the substantive elements, there are attendant procedural aspects to these two 
categories. As to first category, Congress intended the offenses require no force or threats on the 
part of offender.72 Likewise, the age of the offender is of no consequence.73  
There are similar procedural rules that apply to both categories. For example, each distinct sexual 
act under Section 2241(c) can be charged as a separate offense.74 If a perpetrator performs one 
sexual act as defined in Section 2246(2) (e.g., contact between the penis and the vulva) and then 
performs another distinct act (e.g., intentional touching of the genitalia), he can be prosecuted for 
each separate count. Also, mistake of age is not a defense under Section 2241(c).75 Nor is there a 
statute of limitations under Section 2241(c), meaning there is no time limit to when cases may be 
brought against an offender.76 A person who violates any of the offenses in Section 2241(c) may 
be fined and imprisoned for a minimum of 30 years up to life.77 Furthermore, if the offender has 
committed a previous aggravated sexual abuse of a child under Section 2241(c), or a state offense 
that would have been an offense under this subsection had it occurred in a federal jurisdiction, the 
punishment for the second offense will be life imprisonment (unless the death penalty is 
imposed).78 
Abusive Sexual Contact with Minor or Ward  
In 1998, Congress enacted the Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act “to respond to 
the horrifying menace of sex crimes against children” and to provide “law enforcement with the 
tools it needs to investigate and bring to justice those individuals who prey on our nation’s 
children.”79 This act doubled the punishment for crimes committed under 18 U.S.C. Section 2244 
                                                 
69 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2241(a)(1)). 
70 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2241(a)(2)). 
71 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2241(b)). 
72 H.Rept. 99-594, at 16 (1986). 
73 H.Rept. 99-954, at 17 (1986). 
74 United States v. Two Elk, 536 F.3d 890, 899 (8th Cir. 2008) (holding that multiple counts under §2241(c) not 
prohibited under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment as the offense of aggravated sexual abuse is 
considered a “separate-act offense” and not a “course of conduct offense”). 
75 18 U.S.C. §2241(d); see United States v. Juvenile Male, 211 F.3d 1169, 1171 (9th Cir. 2000). 
76 18 U.S.C. §3299 (2006). 
77 18 U.S.C. §2241(c). 
78 Id. 
79 H.Rept. 105-557, at 10 (1998). 
Congressional Research Service 
8 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
if the victim was under the age of 12.80 To determine the elements of each offense under Section 
2244, one must refer back to Sections 2241(a)-(b), 2242, and 2243(a)-(b). For each of these 
offenses, Section 2244 requires that the prohibited conduct currently in the text—“sexual act”—
be replaced with a different prohibited conduct—“sexual contact.”81 As one moves up or down 
the levels of offenses, Congress has increased or decreased the penalty depending on the level of 
force and violence involved.  
Applying this process to Section 2244(c) produces the following offenses. It is unlawful for any 
person while in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or in a 
federally run or federally contracted prison facility, to knowingly engage in sexual contact with a 
child under the age of 12 years by use of force against that child or by threatening or placing the 
child in fear that “any person will be subject to death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping.”82 
Likewise, it is unlawful for any person while in this defined federal jurisdiction to render a child 
unconscious, or administer a drug or intoxicant to this child, substantially impairing her, and then 
initiating sexual contact with her.83 A sexual offender who violates either of these offenses is 
subject to not more than 20 years imprisonment.84 
Similarly, it is a federal offense for a person, while in the special maritime and territorial 
jurisdiction of the United States, to knowingly cause a child under the age of 12 years to engage 
in sexual contact by threatening or placing that child in fear (other than by threatening another 
person who is not the child).85 Also, it is unlawful while in this same defined federal jurisdiction 
to knowingly86 cause a child under the age of 12 to engage in sexual contact if the child is 
“incapable of appraising the nature of the conduct” or is “physically incapable of declining 
participation in, or communicating unwillingness to engage in, that sexual contact.”87 Violators of 
either of these offenses are subject to fines and not more than six years of imprisonment.88 
As a lesser tiered offense, it is unlawful while in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction 
of the United States or in a federally run or contracted prison to engage or attempt to engage in 
sexual contact with a child under 12 years of age.89 Violators of this section are subject to fines 
and not more than four years imprisonment.90 Further, it is also unlawful to commit such an act 
                                                 
80 Protection of Children from Sexual Predators Act of 1998, P.L. 105-314, §302, 112 Stat. 2974, 2979. 
81 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1)-(4). Sexual contact is defined as the “intentional touching, either directly or through the 
clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, 
harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person....” 18 U.S.C. §2246(3) (2006). 
82 18 U.S.C. §2244(c) (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. §2241(a)). One court has noted that an 
offender can be charged with the same conduct under both 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1) and §2241(b) combined with 
§2244(c). United States v. Johns, 309 F.3d 298, 301 (5th Cir. 2002). Section 2244(b) applies to all victims, regardless of 
age, thus is beyond the scope of this memorandum.  
83 18 U.S.C. §2244(c) (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1) and 2241(b)). 
84 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(1)). 
85 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(2) and §2242(1) (2006)). 
86 The mental state requirement of “knowingly” has been described in the sexual abuse context as follows: “[T]he 
defendant realized what he was doing and was aware of the nature of his conduct and did not act through ignorance, 
mistake, or accident. Knowledge may be proved by the Defendant’s conduct and by all the facts and circumstances 
surrounding the case.” United States v. Peters, 277 F.3d 963, 968 (7th Cir. 2002). 
87 §2244(c) (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(2) and 2242(2)). 
88 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(2)). 
89 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(3) and §2243(a) (2006)). 
90 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(3)). 
Congressional Research Service 
9 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
on a child when the child is in official detention and under the custody of the offender.91 There is 
no time limit for when a prosecution may be brought for any of the offenses under Section 
2244.92 
Sexual Abuse of Child at Least 12 Years of Age but Younger than 16 
Congress has also enacted several crimes for sexual acts and sexual contact committed on 
children at least 12 years of age but younger than 16, what has traditionally been called statutory 
rape. Congress wanted these laws to reach “older, mature persons who take advantage of younger, 
immature persons, but not to reach sexual activity between persons of comparable age.”93 Under 
Section 2243(a), a person is prohibited, while in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of 
the United States, or in a federally run or contracted prison, from knowingly engaging, or 
attempting to engage, in a sexual act with a child who is at least 12 years of age but younger than 
16, and the offender is at least four years older than the child.94 Violators of this section are 
subject to 15 years in prison.95 If the offender initiates sexual contact, rather than engaging in a 
sexual act, with the child, that person will be subject to a maximum of two years imprisonment.96 
Under this section, the prosecution need not prove that the defendant knew the victim’s age.97 It 
is, however, a defense if the defendant can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he 
“reasonably believed” that the victim was at least 16 years old or that the defendant and the 
victim were married at the time the act took place.98 
Illegal Sexual Activity in Interstate Commerce 
Dating back to 1910 with the Mann Act, Congress has outlawed certain sexual acts occurring in 
interstate commerce. For instance, under 18 U.S.C. Section 2423(a), it is unlawful to knowingly 
transport a minor (a person under the age of 18 years) in interstate or foreign commerce with the 
intent that the minor engage in prostitution or any other sexual activity99 for which any person can 
be charged with a criminal offense.100 The defendant need not know that the victim is under the 
age of 18 years when the crime is committed.101 Moreover, the government need not prove that 
the illegal behavior was the “dominant purpose” for traveling, but only that it was a “motivating 
factor.”102 There is no limitation for when this crime may be prosecuted.103 A violator of this 
                                                 
91 Id. (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2243(b)). 
92 18 U.S.C. §3299 (2006). 
93 H.Rept. 99-594, at 16 (1986). 
94 18 U.S.C. §2243(a). 
95 Id. at (a)(2). 
96 18 U.S.C. §2244(a)(3) (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2243). 
97 18 U.S.C. §2243(d). 
98 Id. at (c)(1). 
99 United States v. Cole, 262 F.3d 704, 708 (8th Cir. 2001) (holding that the application of a Florida law that prohibited 
a person from having sex with a person at least 12 years of age but younger than 16 was a proper predicate offense 
satisfying the “any other sexual activity” clause of §2423) (citing FLA. STAT. §800.04(4)(a) (2007)). 
100 18 U.S.C. §2423(a) (2006). 
101 United States v. Hamilton, 456 F.2d 171, 173 (3d Cir. 1972). 
102 United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000). 
103 18 U.S.C. §3299 (2006). 
Congressional Research Service 
10 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
statute may be imprisoned from a minimum of 10 years to life.104 It is not a defense to a 
conviction under Section 2423(a) that the person whom the defendant attempted to transport 
across state lines was not actually a minor.105 Rather, it is enough to sustain a conviction if the 
defendant had the requisite intent to transport a minor across state lines, even if the target was not 
actually a minor. 
Additionally, any person who uses the mail or other facility of interstate commerce, or within a 
federal enclave, “knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces” a minor under the age of 18 
years to engage in “sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense” 
can be imprisoned for 10 years to life.106 Finally, it is a federal crime to knowingly transmit 
through the mail or other means of interstate commerce personal information (e.g., name, address, 
social security, e-mail address) about a minor under the age of 16 with the intent to entice or 
encourage any person to engage in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a 
crime.107 
Other Sections Relating to Sexual Abuse 
In addition to the specific criminal offenses, there are several corresponding penalty and 
procedural statutes. If in the course of committing any of the offenses previously mentioned, the 
offender murders the child, that person is subject to death or imprisonment for any term of years 
up to life.108 If 18 U.S.C. Section 3559(e) (the “Two Strikes You’re Out” provision)109 does not 
apply, repeat offenders—persons previously convicted for an offense under chapter 109A of Title 
18, or a state offense consisting of conduct that would be an offense if committed in the proper 
federal jurisdiction—shall be given a prison sentence twice the term that is already provided 
under each respective section.110 If Section 3559(e) applies, repeat offenders may be sentenced to 
life imprisonment.111 Finally, there is no statute of limitations for any of the offenses described 
above.112  
Lesser Included Offenses for 
Child Sexual Abuse Crimes 
Many of the child sexual abuse offenses have seemingly overlapping elements—that is, two 
offenses which have at least one similar element (e.g., sexual contact with a child through the use 
of force versus by threat of force). This overlap implicates the lesser-included offense doctrine, 
which permits a court to instruct the jury on not only the underlying offense charged by the 
                                                 
104 18 U.S.C. §2423(a). 
105 United States v. Morris, 549 F.3d 548, 550 (7th Cir. 2008) (sustaining conviction in which target was actually the 
mother of a 15-year-old girl). 
106 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) (2006). 
107 18 U.S.C. §2425 (2006). 
108 18 U.S.C. §2245 (2006). 
109 18 U.S.C. §3559(e); see supra note 60. 
110 18 U.S.C. §2247 (cross-referencing 18 U.S.C. §2426(b) (2006)). 
111 18 U.S.C. §3559(e). 
112 18 U.S.C. §3299. 
Congressional Research Service 
11 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
government, but also a lesser offense that is “necessarily included” in that charged offense. The 
lesser-offense doctrine was traditionally used to aid the government in achieving a conviction 
when the necessary proof for the primary offense was not attainable, but was sufficient to support 
a lesser charge.113 It has also come to the aid of defendants, however, allowing the jury to use its 
nullification power to convict on the lesser included offense, and also provides a compromise 
conviction for a jury divided on the charged offense.114 
Relying on language in Rule 31 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Supreme Court 
has adopted the “elements” test for determining whether the doctrine is applicable, requiring that 
the elements of the lesser included offense be a subset of the charged offense.115 This requires the 
courts to focus objectively on the elements of the crime and not the actual facts of the crime 
allegedly committed.  
A more straightforward application of the lesser-offense doctrine is displayed in United States v. 
Boyles, where the defendant argued that the court should have instructed the jury on the lesser 
offense of sexual assault under Section 2242(1), in addition to the charged offense of aggravated 
sexual assault under Section 2241(a)(1). Aggravated sexual assault requires “knowingly causing 
another to engage in a sexual act by using force against that person,” whereas general sexual 
assault requires “knowingly causing another to engage in a sexual act by threatening them or 
placing them in fear.”116 Noting this difference between the use of force on a victim as compared 
with using fear or threats, the court held that sexual assault under Section 2242(1) could not be a 
lesser-included offense of aggravated sexual assault, since the elements of the former were not a 
subset of the later.117 
This doctrine becomes more difficult to apply when the elements are closer in nature. Take, for 
example, the split in the federal circuit courts of appeals over whether “sexual contact” under 
Section 2244 (abusive sexual contact) is “necessarily included” in the term “sexual act” under 
Sections 2242 (sexual abuse) and 2243 (sexual abuse of a minor or ward). The majority of the 
circuits hold that the inclusion of the intent requirement in Section 2244, the requirement that the 
prohibited act be coupled with “an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify 
the sexual desire ...,” which is not contained in Sections 2242 or 2243, necessarily requires that 
the lesser-included offense instruction not be given.118 The Eighth Circuit is the sole minority 
circuit holding that sexual contact under Section 2244 is a lesser included offense of both 
aggravated sexual abuse and sexual abuse of a minor.119 
                                                 
113 6 WAYNE R. LAFAVE ET AL., CRIMINAL PROCEDURE §24.8(d) (3d ed. 2007).  
114 Id.  
115 Schmuck v. United States, 489 U.S. 705, 716 (1989) (citing FED. R. CRIM. P. 31). Rule 31 states that a “defendant 
may be found guilty of ... an offense necessarily included in the offense charged.” FED. R. CRIM. P. 31. 
116 United States v. Boyles, 57 F.3d 535, 544 (7th Cir. 1995). 
117 Id. at 544-45. 
118 United States v. Castillo, 140 F.3d 874, 886 (10th Cir. 1998); United States v. Torres, 937 F.2d 1469, 1477-78 (9th 
Cir. 1991). 
119 United States v. Demarias, 876 F.2d 674, 676-77 (8th Cir. 1989). 
Congressional Research Service 
12 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
Appendix. Federal Child Sexual Abuse Laws 
 
 Code  Jurisdictional  
 
 Statute 
of 
Offense  
Section No. 
Clause  
Prohibited Act 
 Penalty 
Limitations 
Aggravated 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Crossing a state line   Committing 
or 
  30 years–Life     No limitation  
sexual abuse of a 
§2241(c)  
with the intent to 
attempting to 
child under 12 
engage in a sexual 
commit a sexual act 
years 
act or in the special 
on a child under the 
maritime or 
age of 12 years 
territorial 
jurisdiction of the 
United States or in 
a federally run or 
contracted prison  
Aggravated 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Special maritime or 
  Knowingly renders a    30 years–Life     No limitation 
sexual abuse of a 
§2241(c) 
territorial 
child at least 12 
child at least 12 
& §2241(b) 
jurisdiction of the 
years of age but 
years of age but 
United States or in 
younger than 16 
younger than 16 
a federally run or 
unconscious or 
contracted prison 
administers a drug 
to that child and 
engages or attempts 
to engage in a sexual 
act with that child 
Aggravated 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Special maritime or 
  Knowingly causing a 
  30 years–Life     No limitation 
sexual abuse of 
§2241(c) 
territorial 
child at least 12 
child at least 12 
& §2241(a) 
jurisdiction of the 
years of age but 
years of age but 
United States or in 
younger than 16 to 
younger than 16 
a federally run or 
engage in sexual act 
contracted prison 
by using force or 
threat of death, 
serious bodily injury, 
or kidnapping 
Sexual contact 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Special maritime or 
 Knowingly 
initiates   20 
year 
  No limitation  
with a child 
§2244(c), 
territorial 
sexual contact with 
maximum  
under the age of 
§2244(a)(1), 
jurisdiction of the 
a child under 12 
12 years through 
§2241(a) 
United States or in 
years of age through 
force or threat  
a federally run or 
use of force or 
contracted prison  
threat to kill, 
seriously injure, or 
kidnap any person  
Sexual contact 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Special maritime or 
 Knowingly 
initiates   20 
year 
  No limitation  
with a child 
§2244(c), 
territorial 
sexual contact with 
maximum 
under the age of 
§2244(a)(1), 
jurisdiction of the 
a child under 12 
12 years while 
& §2241(b) 
United States or in 
years of age while 
unconscious or 
a federally run or 
child is unconscious 
incapacitated 
contracted prison 
or has been 
administered drugs 
Sexual contact 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Special maritime or 
 Knowingly 
initiates   6 
year 
  No limitation  
with a child 
§2244(c), 
territorial 
sexual contact with 
maximum 
under the age of 
§2244(a)(2), 
jurisdiction of the 
a child under 12 
12 years through 
& 2242(1) 
United States or in 
years of age by 
fear or threat 
a federally run or 
threatening or 
contracted prison 
placing child in fear 
Congressional Research Service 
13 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
 Code  Jurisdictional  
 
 Statute 
of 
Offense  
Section No. 
Clause  
Prohibited Act 
 Penalty 
Limitations 
Sexual contact 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Special maritime or 
 Knowingly 
initiates   6 
year 
  No limitation  
with child under 
§2244(c), 
territorial 
sexual contact with 
maximum 
12 years of age 
§2244(a)(2), 
jurisdiction of the 
a child under 12 
who is 
& 2242(2) 
United States or in 
years of age who is 
incapacitated  
a federally run or 
incapable of 
contracted prison 
understanding the 
situation or 
physically incapable 
of declining 
participation  
Sexual contact 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Special maritime or 
 Knowingly 
initiates   4 
year 
  No limitation  
with a child 
§2244(c), 
territorial 
or attempts to 
maximum 
under 12 years 
§2244(a)(3) 
jurisdiction of the 
initiate sexual 
 
of age 
& §2243 
United States or in 
contact with a child 
a federally run or 
at least 12 years of 
contracted prison 
age but younger 
than 16 
Sexual act with 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Special maritime or 
 Knowingly 
engaging,   15 
year 
  No limitation  
child at least 12 
§2243(a) 
territorial 
or attempting to 
maximum  
years of age but 
jurisdiction of the 
engage in sexual 
younger than 16 
United States or in 
contact with a child 
a federally run or 
at least 12 years of 
contracted prison 
age but younger 
than 16 
Sexual contact 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Special maritime or 
 Knowingly 
initiating   4 
year 
  No limitation  
with child at 
§2244(a)(3) 
territorial 
sexual contact with 
maximum  
least 12 years of 
& §2243(a) 
jurisdiction of the 
a child at least 12 
age but younger 
United States or in 
years of age but 
than 16 
a federally run or 
younger than 16 
contracted prison 
Sexual activity 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Use of mail or 
 Knowingly 
 10 
years–Life   No 
limitation 
with a minor 
§2422(b) 
facility of interstate 
persuading or 
under the age of 
commerce, or 
inducing a minor 
18 
special maritime or 
under the age of 18 
territorial 
to engage in sexual 
jurisdiction of the 
activity when that 
United States 
act is a criminal 
offense 
Transportation 
 18 
U.S.C. 
 Transport 
in 
 Knowingly 
 10 
mandatory  No 
limitation 
of minor under 
§2423 
interstate 
transporting a minor 
minimum 
18 years of age 
commerce 
under the age of 18 
with intent to 
in interstate 
engage in sexual 
commerce with the 
activity 
intent that the 
minor engage in 
sexual activity when 
that act is a criminal 
offense 
Congressional Research Service 
14 
Sexual Abuse of Children: Federal Criminal Offenses 
 
 Code  Jurisdictional  
 
 Statute 
of 
Offense  
Section No. 
Clause  
Prohibited Act 
 Penalty 
Limitations 
Transmittal of 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Use of mail or 
 Knowingly 
transmit   5 
year 
 No 
limitation 
information 
§2425 
other facility of 
personal information 
maximum 
about minor to 
interstate 
about a minor under 
entice a sexual 
commerce 
16 years with the 
act 
intent to entice any 
person to engage in 
any sexual act for 
which any person 
can be charged with 
a crime 
Sexual contact 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Crossing a state line    Child is murdered 
  Death or up 
  No limitation  
or act that 
§2245 
or in the special 
during the 
to life 
results in death 
maritime or 
commission of a 
imprisonment  
of child 
territorial 
sexual offense as 
jurisdiction of the 
defined in Title 18, 
United States or in 
chapter 109, and 
a federally run or 
§§2423. 
contracted prison 
Repeat 
 18 
U.S.C. 
  Special maritime or 
 Second 
or 
 Twice 
the 
 No 
limitation 
Offenders 
§2247 
territorial 
subsequent offense 
original 
jurisdiction of the 
committed under 
sentence, or 
United States or in 
chapter 109A of 
life if person 
a federally run or 
Title 18 
was 
contracted prison 
previously 
convicted of 
a sex offense 
against a 
minor 
Two sexual 
 18 
U.S.C. 
 — 
 A 
federal 
sex 
 Life, 
unless   No 
limitation 
abuse offenses 
§3559 
offense coupled with 
death penalty 
a prior sex 
applies 
conviction (under 
either applicable 
federal or state law). 
Source: Title 18 of the United States Code. 
 
Author Contact Information 
 
Richard M. Thompson II 
   
Legislative Attorney 
rthompson@crs.loc.gov, 7-8449 
 
 
Congressional Research Service 
15