Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the
112th Congress

James M. Bickley
Specialist in Public Finance
April 20, 2011
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R41591
CRS Report for Congress
P
repared for Members and Committees of Congress

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

Summary
The President and leading Members of Congress have stated that fundamental tax reform is a
major policy objective for the 112th Congress. These policymakers have said that fundamental tax
reform is needed in order to raise a large amount of additional revenue, which is necessary to
reduce high forecast budget deficits and the sharply rising national debt. Congressional interest
has been expressed in both a major overhaul of the U.S. tax system and the feasibility of levying a
consumption tax. Some proponents of reform argue that the tax base should be broadened by
reducing or eliminating many tax expenditures. Tax expenditures are revenue losses resulting
from federal tax provisions that grant special tax relief designed to encourage certain kinds of
behavior by taxpayers or to aid taxpayers in special circumstances. An alternative to increasing
tax revenues is cutting spending. Thus, Members are faced with considering the best mix of tax
increases and spending cuts in order to reduce deficits and slow the growth of the national debt.
Proposals for fundamental reform have been made in reports by the National Commission on
Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (the “Commission”) and the Debt Reduction Task Force of the
Bipartisan Policy Center. In the 112th Congress, fundamental tax reforms are proposed in two
companion bills, H.R. 25 and S. 13, Fair Tax Act of 2011; H.R. 99, Fair and Simple Tax Act of
2011
; H.R. 1125, the Debt Free America Act; S. 727, the Bipartisan Tax Fairness and
Simplification Act of 2011
; and H.R. 1040, the Freedom Flat Tax Act. On April 13, President
Obama presented his Framework for Shared Prosperity and Shared Fiscal Responsibility, which
includes fundamental tax reform. On April 14, 2011, Representative Paul Ryan introduced
H.Con.Res. 34. On April 15, 2011, the House passed this FY 2012 budget resolution, which
includes fundamental changes in the U.S. tax system. An evaluation of these and other proposals
would consider the effects on equity, efficiency, and simplicity.
This report primarily covers fundamental tax reform. CRS reports are available online concerning
the other three categories of tax reform: tax reform based on the elimination of the individual
alternative minimum tax (AMT), proposals for reforming the corporate income tax, and proposals
for reforming the U.S. taxation of international business.
A temporary individual AMT patch for 2010 and 2011 was included in the Tax Relief,
Unemployment Insurance Authorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010
, which became P.L. 111-
312 on December 17, 2010. The patch increased the individual AMT exemption amounts. Some
proponents of tax reform argue that the AMT should be repealed or a permanent patch should be
passed. The repeal or passage of a permanent patch of the individual AMT would require a major
increase in taxes to offset the large revenue loss.
Options for reforming the corporate income tax are under consideration. The concept of lowering
the marginal corporate income tax rate and broadening the corporate income tax base has been
advocated by some Members of Congress. Other options for reform include corporate tax
integration and the replacement of the income tax system with a consumption tax.
The current system of U.S. taxation of international business is complex and difficult to
administer. Furthermore, critics argue that the current system is not sufficiently neutral, which
results in economic inefficiency. Proposals to reform the system include the replacement of the
current hybrid system with either a territorial tax system or a residence-based system.
This report will be updated in the event of significant legislative activity or policy proposals.
Congressional Research Service

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1
Fundamental Tax Reform Options ............................................................................................... 2
Base-Broadening................................................................................................................... 2
New Tax ............................................................................................................................... 2
Broad-Based Consumption Tax ....................................................................................... 3
Environmental Tax.......................................................................................................... 4
Framework of Evaluation............................................................................................................ 4
Equity ................................................................................................................................... 4
Efficiency ............................................................................................................................. 5
Simplicity ............................................................................................................................. 5
Other Tax Reform Issues ............................................................................................................. 5
Alternative Minimum Tax for Individuals.............................................................................. 5
Business Taxation ................................................................................................................. 6
International Taxation ........................................................................................................... 6
Fundamental Tax Reform Legislation in the 112th Congress......................................................... 7
Representative David Dreier’s Proposal ................................................................................ 7
Representative Rob Woodall/Senator Saxby Chambliss Proposal........................................... 8
Representative Chaka Fattah’s Proposal ................................................................................ 8
Senator Ron Wyden’s Proposal.............................................................................................. 8
Representative Michael C. Burgess’s Proposal ...................................................................... 9
Other Legislation in the 112th Congress Relevant to Fundamental Tax Reform........................... 10
H.R. 462. (Sponsor: Representative Bob Goodlatte). ........................................................... 10
H.Con.Res. 34. (Sponsor: Representative Paul Ryan). ......................................................... 10
President Obama’s Fiscal Reform Proposal ............................................................................... 10

Contacts
Author Contact Information ...................................................................................................... 11

Congressional Research Service

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

Introduction
The President and leading Members of Congress have stated that fundamental tax reform is a
major policy objective for the 112th Congress. These policymakers have said that fundamental tax
reform is needed in order to raise a large amount of additional revenue, which is necessary to
reduce high forecast budget deficits and the sharply rising national debt. Congressional interest
has been expressed in both a major overhaul of the U.S. tax system and the feasibility of levying a
consumption tax over the existing tax system.1 Some proponents of reform argue that the tax base
should be broadened by reducing or eliminating many tax expenditures. “Tax expenditures are
revenue losses resulting from federal tax provisions that grant special tax relief designed to
encourage certain kinds of behavior by taxpayers or to aid taxpayers in special circumstances.”2 If
tax expenditures are reduced substantially or a consumption tax is levied or both, then the
marginal income tax rates could be reduced. An alternative to increasing tax revenues is cutting
spending. Thus, Members are faced with considering the best mix of tax increases and spending
cuts in order to reduce deficits and slow the growth of the national debt.
In December 2010, The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (the
“Commission”) issued a report titled The Moment of Truth, which proposed extensive broadening
of both the individual income tax base and the corporate income tax base by eliminating all
business tax expenditures and almost all individual tax expenditures.3 Marginal individual and
corporate income tax rates would be reduced, and the individual alternative minimum tax would
be abolished. The taxation of foreign-source income would be changed by moving to a territorial
system.4 On November 17, 2010, the Debt Reduction Task Force of the Bipartisan Policy Center
issued a report titled Restoring America’s Future.5 This report also recommended that individual
and corporate income tax bases be broadened by reducing or eliminating most tax expenditures.
Marginal individual and corporate income tax rates would be lowered, and the individual
alternative minimum tax would be eliminated. In addition, this report recommended that a 6.5%
value-added tax be levied. The recommendations of these two reports may influence the tax
reform debate in the 112th Congress.
In the 112th Congress, Members of Congress have introduced numerous bills containing
incremental or marginal adjustments in the tax code in an attempt to redistribute income,
reallocate resources, change individual behavior, etc. Proposed incremental or small tax
adjustments are considered tax changes.6 In contrast, fundamental tax reform concerns a major
proposed overhaul of the U.S. tax system, which affects the entire tax system or a major
component of the system.
In the 112th Congress, bills proposing fundamental tax reform have been introduced. Two
companion bills, H.R. 25 (introduced by Representative Rob Woodall) and S. 13 (introduced by
Senator Saxby Chambliss), Fair Tax Act of 2011, would replace the individual income tax, the

1 For more information, see CRS Report R41641, Tax Policy Options for Deficit Reduction, by Molly F. Sherlock.
2 Senate Committee on the Budget, Tax Expenditures: Compendium of Background Material on Individual Provisions,
Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off., December 2008, p. 2.
3 The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, The Moment of Truth, December 2010, 65 p.
4 Ibid., p. 33.
5 The Debt Reduction Task Force, Bipartisan Policy Center, Restoring America’s Future, November 17, 2010, 138 p.
6 Some of these proposed tax changes are examined in CRS reports.
Congressional Research Service
1

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

corporate income tax, all payroll taxes, the self-employment tax, and the estate and gift taxes with
a 23% (tax-inclusive) national retail sales tax. Representative David Dreier introduced H.R. 99,
Fair and Simple Tax Act of 2011, which would establish an alternative determination of tax
liability for individuals. Representative Michael Burgess introduced H.R. 1040, Freedom Flat Tax
Act
, which would authorize an individual or a person engaged in business activity to make an
irrevocable election to be subject to a flat tax (in lieu of the existing tax provisions).
Representative Chaka Fattah introduced H.R. 1125, Debt Free America Act, which would impose
a transaction fee of 1% on the entire amount of specified intermediate and final transactions.
Revenue raised from this fee would be sufficient to eliminate the national debt during a 10-year
period and phase out the income tax on individuals. On April 13, 2011, President Obama
presented his Framework for Shared Prosperity and Shared Fiscal Responsibility, which proposes
to reduce the deficit by $4 trillion over 12 years or less. The President’s plan includes
comprehensive tax reform. On April 14, 2011, Representative Paul Ryan introduced H.Con.Res.
34. On April 15, 2011, the House passed this FY2012 budget resolution, which includes
fundamental changes in the U.S. tax system.
This report primarily covers fundamental tax reform because CRS reports are available online
concerning the other three categories of tax reform: tax reform based on the elimination of the
individual alternative minimum tax (AMT), proposals for reforming the corporate income tax,
and proposals for reforming the U.S. taxation of international business.7
Fundamental Tax Reform Options
Two broad fundamental tax reform categories for addressing the severe deficit problem are base-
broadening and levying a new tax. Some of the revenue from base-broadening and a new tax
could be used to reduce marginal tax rates.
Base-Broadening
Some Members of Congress have expressed concern about the large number and high cost of tax
expenditures.8 Examples of tax expenditures are the deduction for mortgage interest on owner-
occupied residences and the deduction for property taxes on owner-occupied residences. Many of
these tax expenditures are seen as targets to be reduced or eliminated. Congress may want to
consider whether the benefits of a particular tax expenditure exceed the costs of that tax
expenditure. Arguably, the current tax reform debate deals with broadening the individual and
corporate income tax bases and lowering marginal tax rates.
New Tax
Revenue from a new tax would allow the retention of more tax expenditures and lower reductions
in other tax expenditures. Furthermore, revenue from a new tax could finance a larger reduction

7 Citations of these CRS reports are shown in footnotes in the sections covering these other categories of tax reform.
8 For an analysis of tax expenditures, see CRS Report RL34622, Tax Expenditures and the Federal Budget, by Thomas
L. Hungerford.
Congressional Research Service
2

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

in marginal income tax rates and permit a smaller reduction in federal spending. Broad categories
have received the most attention: consumption and environmental taxes.
Broad-Based Consumption Tax
In recent Congresses, three major types of broad-based consumption taxes have been included in
congressional tax proposals: the value-added tax (VAT), the retail sales tax, and the flat tax. These
possible broad-based consumption taxes have the potential of a robust revenue yield.
Value-Added Tax
A value-added tax is a tax on the value that a firm adds to a product at each stage of production.
The value the firm adds is the difference between a firm’s sales and a firm’s purchases of inputs
from other firms. The VAT is collected by each firm at every stage of production.
There are three alternative methods of calculating VAT: the credit method, the subtraction
method, and the addition method. Under the credit method, the firm calculates the VAT to be
remitted to the government by a two-step process. First, the firm multiplies its taxable sales by the
tax rate to calculate VAT collected on sales. Second, the firm credits VAT paid on inputs against
VAT collected on sales and remits this difference to the government. The firm calculates its VAT
liability before setting its prices to fully shift the VAT to the buyer. Under the credit-invoice
method, a type of credit method, the firm is required to show VAT separately on all sales invoices
and to calculate the VAT credit on inputs by adding all VAT shown on purchase invoices.
Under the subtraction method, the firm calculates its value added by subtracting its cost of taxed
inputs from its sales. Next, the firm determines its VAT liability by multiplying its value added by
the VAT rate. Under the addition method, the firm calculates its value added by adding all
payments for untaxed inputs (e.g., wages and profits). Next, the firm multiplies its value added by
the VAT rate to calculate VAT to be remitted to the government.
All developed nations, except Japan, use the credit-invoice method. Japan uses the subtraction
method.
Retail Sales Tax
A retail sales tax is a consumption tax levied only at a single stage of production, the retail stage.
The retailer collects a specific percentage markup in the retail price of a good or service, which is
then remitted to the government.9 As of February 1, 2010, the Tax Foundation reports that 45
states had retail sales taxes.10

9 For a contrast between the VAT and the national sales tax, see CRS Report RL33438, A Value-Added Tax Contrasted
With a National Sales Tax
, by James M. Bickley.
10 State Sales, Gasoline, Cigarette, and Alcohol Tax Rates by State, 2000-2010, Tax Foundation. Available at
http://www.taxfoundation.org, visited April 18, 2011.
Congressional Research Service
3

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

Flat Tax
A flat tax could be levied based on the proposal formulated by Robert E. Hall and Alvin
Rabushka of the Hoover Institution.11 Their proposal would have two components: a wage tax
and a cash-flow tax on businesses. (A wage tax is a tax only on salaries and wages: a cash-flow
tax is generally a tax on gross receipts minus all outlays.) It is essentially a modified VAT, with
wages and pensions subtracted from the VAT base and taxed at the individual level. Under a
standard VAT, a firm would not subtract its wage and pension contributions when calculating its
tax base. Under the flat tax, some wage income would not be included in the tax base because of
exemptions. Under a standard VAT, all wage income would be included in the tax base.
Environmental Tax
Environmental taxes have been proposed to reduce pollution and raise revenue. The most
frequently discussed energy tax is a carbon tax that would be levied on the volume of carbon
emitted. This tax is frequently recommended by economists, but the Obama Administration is
attempting to implement a cap and trade system. Another alternative energy tax would be higher
gasoline taxes.
Framework of Evaluation
In evaluating any change in tax policy, the prevailing framework is to analyze the tax policy for
equity, efficiency, and simplicity. Tradeoffs may exist between these three objectives. For
example, if greater income equality is desired, this may conflict with the goal of economic
efficiency.
Equity
Economic theory maintains that it is not possible to make interpersonal comparisons of utility.
Hence, whether a change in the distribution of income, with gainers and losers, is an
improvement in the national welfare is a value judgment. The effects on different groups,
however, can be measured and debated. Thus, the following questions can be examined.
How will different income groups be affected annually and over their lifetimes? Will taxpayers in
similar circumstances pay approximately the same amount of taxes? What will be the effect on
taxpayers in different age groups? Will there be distributional effects by region of the country?
How will minority groups be affected? What will be the tax incidence on families versus single
taxpayers?

11 For a comprehensive analysis of the flat tax, see CRS Report 98-529, Flat Tax: An Overview of the Hall-Rabushka
Proposal
, by James M. Bickley.
Congressional Research Service
4

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

Efficiency
Tax policy should promote economic efficiency; that is, a tax change should be as neutral as
possible by minimizing economic distortions.12 Low marginal tax rates tend to lessen distortions.
Many efficiency questions concern household decisions. What will be the effect of a tax change
on households’ decisions to save versus consume? Will households’ choices of leisure versus
work be affected? Will household decisions about the composition of goods and services
consumed be affected?
Other efficiency questions concern firms’ decisions. What will be the effect on firms’ decisions
concerning the method of financing (debt or equity), choice among inputs, type of business
organization (corporation, partnership, of sole proprietorship), and composition of output?
Simplicity
The greater the simplicity of the tax system, the lower will be the administrative and compliance
costs. Thus, tax policy should eliminate any unnecessary complexity and promote transparency.
Numerous questions concerning simplicity arise; among them are the following: How will a tax
change affect federal administrative costs? Will the administrative costs of state and local
governments change? How will compliance costs of households be affected? Will business
compliance costs change?
Other Tax Reform Issues
Alternative Minimum Tax for Individuals
In 1969, Congress enacted the individual alternative minimum tax (AMT) to make sure that
everyone paid at least a minimum of income taxes and still preserve the economic and social
incentives in the tax code. The combined effects of inflation and the legislative reductions in the
regular income tax have expanded the number of taxpayers subject to the AMT. Consequently,
Congress has passed temporary increases in the basic exemption for the AMT to limit the number
of taxpayers subject to the AMT. Most recently, an AMT patch for 2010 and 2011 was included in
the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Authorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010, which
became P.L. 111-312 on December 17, 2010. Some proponents of tax reform argue that the AMT
should be repealed or a permanent patch should be passed, but either reform would require a
major increase in taxes to offset the large revenue loss.13

12 The loss in economic efficiency due to a tax is referred to by economists as the deadweight loss or excess burden of
the tax.
13 For an examination of the alternative minimum tax for individuals, see CRS Report RL30149, The Alternative
Minimum Tax for Individuals
, by Steven Maguire.
Congressional Research Service
5

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

Business Taxation
Federal taxes on business income have differential effects.14 For example, non-corporate income
is taxed less than corporate income, debt financing is an expense but equity financing is not, and
depreciation rules favor machines and equipment over structures and inventory. These differential
effects distort investment decisions, lessen economic efficiency, and lower economic welfare.
Several options have been proposed to reform federal business taxation.15
First, comprehensive taxation of corporate income and lower tax rates would eliminate or reduce
most major distortions. In the 112th Congress, the concept of lowering the marginal corporate
income tax rate and broadening the corporate income tax base has been advocated by some
Members of Congress.
Second, corporate tax integration would eliminate the double taxation of corporate income by
altering the general system of taxing corporate-source income. Integration could apply to both
retained earnings and dividends and thus all corporate profits (“full integration”), or the treatment
only of earnings that are distributed (“partial integration”).
Third, a broad-based consumption tax could be levied that would replace individual and corporate
income taxes.
International Taxation
The rapid growth of the foreign trade sector in the U.S. economy and the expansion of
international flows of capital have increased the importance of appropriate U.S. international tax
practices.16 The two alternative principles on which countries can base their international tax
systems are residence and territory.
Under a residence system, a country taxes its own residents (or domestically chartered “resident”
corporations) on their worldwide income, regardless of its geographic source. Under a territorial
system, a country taxes only income that is earned within its own borders. Currently, the United
States has a hybrid system with elements of both a residence system and a territorial system. The
United States taxes both income of foreign firms earned within its borders as well as the
worldwide income of its U.S.-chartered firms. U.S. taxes, however, do not apply to the foreign
income of U.S.-owned corporations chartered abroad. A U.S. firm can indefinitely defer U.S. tax
on its foreign income if it conducts its foreign operations through a foreign-chartered subsidiary
corporation; U.S. taxes do not apply as long as the foreign subsidiary’s income is reinvested
overseas. With some exceptions, U.S. taxes apply only when the income is remitted to the U.S.-
resident parent as dividends or other intra-firm payments. While the United States taxes
worldwide income on either a current or deferred basis, it also allows a foreign tax credit for

14 For an overview of the reform of federal business taxation, see CRS Report RL33171, Federal Business Taxation:
The Current System, Its Effects, and Options for Reform
, by Donald J. Marples. For an overview of corporate tax
reform issues, see CRS Report RL34229, Corporate Tax Reform: Issues for Congress, by Jane G. Gravelle and Thomas
L. Hungerford.
15 For a comprehensive analysis of these options, see CRS Report RL33171, Federal Business Taxation: The Current
System, Its Effects, and Options for Reform
, by Donald J. Marples.
16 This section of this report summarizes some basic concepts in CRS Report RL34115, Reform of U.S. International
Taxation: Alternatives
, by Jane G. Gravelle. Some excerpts are stated from this report.
Congressional Research Service
6

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

foreign taxes paid on a dollar-for-dollar basis against U.S. taxes in order to avoid the double-
taxation of income.17
The current system is complex and difficult to administer. Furthermore, critics argue that the
current system is not sufficiently neutral, which results in economic inefficiency. The system
provides a tax incentive to invest in countries with low tax rates and a disincentive to invest in
countries with high tax rates. Proposals to reform the U.S. international tax system include the
replacement of the current hybrid system with either a territorial tax system or a residence-based
system.18
Fundamental Tax Reform Legislation in the 112th
Congress

In the 112th Congress, several bills for fundamental tax reform have been introduced.
Representative David Dreier’s Proposal
H.R. 99. The Fair and Simple Tax Act of 2011 was introduced on January 5, 2011, and referred to
the House Ways and Means Committee. This bill would establish an alternative determination of
tax liability for individuals. A “simplified taxable income” would be taxed at the rates of 10% on
the first $40,000, 15% on the income over $40,000 but under $150,000, and 30% on the income
over $150,000. Simplified taxable income would equal gross income less the sum of deductions
for personal exemptions, the deduction allowed for the acquisition of indebtedness with respect to
the principal residence, the deduction allowed for state and local income taxes, the deduction
allowed for charitable giving, and the deduction allowed for medical expenses. The estate and gift
taxes would be repealed. The alternative minimum tax exemption amounts would be indexed for
inflation. The maximum corporate income tax rate would be reduced to 25%. The 15% rate on
dividends and capital gains of individuals would be reduced to 10%. The basis for assets for
purposes of determining capital gain or loss would be indexed for inflation. This bill would create
tax-free accounts for retirement savings, lifetime savings, and lifetime skills. Examples of
qualified life skills include assessments of skill levels, development of an individual employment
plan, career planning, occupational skills training, on-the-job training, and entrepreneurial
training. This bill would repeal the adjusted gross income threshold in the medical care deduction
for individuals under age 65 who have no employer health coverage. This bill would make the
research credit permanent. This bill would repeal Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA) relating to sunset of provisions. This bill would repeal
Section 107 of the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 relating to application
of EGTRRA sunset to this title.

17 Ibid., p. 2.
18 Ibid., pp. 12-16.
Congressional Research Service
7

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

Representative Rob Woodall/Senator Saxby Chambliss Proposal
H.R. 25. The Fair Tax Act of 2011 was introduced on January 5, 2011, by Representative Rob
Woodall and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means. A companion bill, S. 13, the Fair
Tax Act of 2011,
was introduced on January 25, 2011, by Senator Saxby Chambliss and referred to
the Senate Finance Committee. This proposal would repeal the individual income tax, the
corporate income tax, all payroll taxes, the self-employment tax, and the estate and gift taxes and
levy a 23% (tax-inclusive) national retail sales tax as a replacement. The tax-inclusive retail sales
tax would equal 23% of the sum of the sales price of an item and the amount of the retail sales
tax. Every family would receive a rebate of the sales tax on spending amounts up to the federal
poverty level (plus an extra amount to prevent any marriage penalty). The Social Security
Administration would provide a monthly sales tax rebate to registered qualified families. The
23% national retail sales would not be levied on exports. The sales tax would be separately stated
and charged. Social Security and Medicare benefits would remain the same with payroll tax
revenue replaced by some of the revenue from the retail sales tax. States could elect to collect the
national retail sales tax on behalf of the federal government in exchange for a fee. Taxpayer rights
provisions are incorporated into the act. The sales tax would sunset at the end of a seven-year
period beginning on the enactment of this act if the Sixteenth Amendment is not repealed. This
amendment provided Congress with the “power to lay and collect taxes on incomes.... ”
Representative Chaka Fattah’s Proposal
H.R. 1125. The Debt Free America Act was introduced on March 16, 2011, and referred to the
Committee on Ways and Means and three other committees. This act would impose a transaction
fee of 1% on the entire amount of specified intermediate and final transactions. Revenue raised
from this fee would be sufficient to eliminate the national debt during a 10-year period and phase
out the income tax on individuals. The term specified transaction “means any transaction that
uses a payment instrument, including any check, cash, credit card, transfer of stock, bonds, or
other financial instrument.” The fees would be collected by the seller or financial institution
servicing the transaction and would be paid to the U.S. Treasury. The bill would establish a
Bipartisan Task Force for Responsible Fiscal Action, which would identify factors affecting the
long-term fiscal imbalance, analyze potential courses of action, and provide recommendations
and legislative language to improve the long-term fiscal imbalance.
Senator Ron Wyden’s Proposal
S. 727. The Bipartisan Tax Fairness and Simplification Act of 2011 was introduced on April 5,
2011, and referred to the Senate Finance Committee. This act was also sponsored by Senator Dan
Coats and is often referred to as the Wyden-Coats proposal. This proposal would reform the
current income tax base rather than changing to a consumption base. This bill has three stated
purposes: (1) to make the federal individual income tax system simpler, fairer, and more
transparent; (2) to make the federal corporate income tax rate a flat 24%, repeal the corporate
alternative minimum tax, and eliminate special tax preferences that favor particular types of
businesses or activities; and (3) to partially offset the federal budget deficit through the increased
fiscal responsibility resulting from these reforms.
The progressive individual income tax would have three rates: 15%, 25%, and 35%. The
individual alternative minimum tax would be eliminated. The standard deduction would almost
triple. While most deductions would be eliminated, the bill would include deductions for
Congressional Research Service
8

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

mortgage interest and charitable contributions. The bill would permanently extend the
enhancements of the child tax credit, the earned income tax credit, and the dependent care credit.
The bill would consolidate the three existing types of IRAs into a new retirement savings account,
and a new lifetime savings account. A married couple would be able to contribute up to $14,000
per year to tax-favored retirement and savings accounts. The corporate tax rate would be 24% of
taxable income. The corporate tax base would be broadened by the elimination of numerous tax
credits, deductions, and exclusions from income. The growth of small businesses would be
encouraged by allowing businesses with gross annual receipts of up to $1 million to permanently
expense all equipment and inventory costs in a single year. The bill includes numerous provisions
to improve tax compliance.
Representative Michael C. Burgess’s Proposal
H.R. 1040. The Freedom Flat Tax Act was introduced on March 11, 2011, by Representative
Burgess and referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means and the House Committee on
Rules.
This proposal would authorize an individual or a person engaged in business activity to make an
irrevocable election to be subject to a flat tax (in lieu of the existing tax provisions). The flat tax
was based on the concepts of the Hall-Rabushka flat tax proposal. Each act would also repeal the
estate and gift taxes.
For individuals not engaged in business activity who select the flat tax, their initial tax rate would
be 19%, but after two years this rate would decline to 17%. The individual flat tax would be
levied on all wages, retirement distributions, and unemployment compensation.
The flat tax would have “standard deductions” that would equal the sum of the “basic standard
deduction” and the “additional standard deduction.”
The “basic standard deduction” would depend on filing status:
• $30,320 for a married couple filing jointly or a surviving spouse
• $19,350 for a single head of household
• $15,160 for a single person or a married person filing a separate return
The “additional standard deduction” would be an amount equal to $6,530 for each dependent of
the taxpayer. All deductions would be indexed for inflation using the consumer price index (CPI).
For individuals engaged in business activity who select the flat tax, their initial tax rate would be
19% (declining to 17% when the tax was fully phased in two years after enactment) on the
difference between the gross revenue of the business and the sum of its purchases from other
firms, wage payments, and pension contributions.
Any congressional action that raises the flat tax rate or reduces the amount of the standard
deduction would require a three-fifths (supermajority) vote in both the Senate and the House of
Representatives. The effective date of the flat tax would be calendar year 2012.
Congressional Research Service
9

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

Other Legislation in the 112th Congress Relevant to
Fundamental Tax Reform

H.R. 462. (Sponsor: Representative Bob Goodlatte).
The Tax Code Termination Act was introduced on January 26, 2011, and referred to the House
Committee on Ways and Means. After December 31, 2015, this bill proposes to terminate the tax
code except for self-employment taxes, Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes, and Railroad
Retirement taxes. This proposal declares that any new federal tax system should be a simple and
fair system that (1) applies a low rate to all Americans, (2) provides tax relief for working
Americans, (3) protects the rights of taxpayers and reduces tax collection abuses, (4) eliminates
the bias against savings and investment, (5) promotes economic growth and job creation, and (6)
does not penalize marriage or families. This bill would require that the new federal tax system be
approved by Congress not later than July 4, 2015.
H.Con.Res. 34. (Sponsor: Representative Paul Ryan).
House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan introduced this continuing resolution on April 14, 2011,
“establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2012 and setting forth
appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2013 through 2021.” On April 15, 2011, this bill was
passed by the House. This FY2012 budget resolution proposes to reduce future deficits and slow
the growth of the national debt. Major reforms in the tax system are proposed. The summary
regarding taxes states that the budget resolution
• keeps taxes low so the economy can grow, eliminates roughly $800 billion in tax
increases imposed by the President’s health care law, and prevents the $1.5
trillion tax increase called for in the President’s budget; and
• calls for a simpler, less burdensome tax code for households and small
businesses, lowers tax rates for individuals, businesses, and families, sets top
rates for individuals and businesses at 25%, and improves incentives for growth,
savings, and investment.19
President Obama’s Fiscal Reform Proposal
On April 13, 2011, President Obama gave a speech in which he presented his Framework for
Shared Prosperity and Shared Fiscal Responsibility
. The President set a goal of reducing the
deficit by $4 trillion in 12 years or less.20 Under tax reform, the fact sheet for his proposal states
The President is calling on Congress to undertake comprehensive tax reform that produces a
system which is fairer, has fewer loopholes, less complexity, and is not rigged in favor of
those who can afford lawyers and accountants to game it.

19 House Committee on the Budget, Chairman Paul Ryan, The Path to Prosperity, April 5, 2011, p. 5.
20 The White House, Office of the Press Secretary, Fact Sheet: The President’s Framework for Shared Prosperity and
Shared Fiscal Responsibility
, April 13, 2011, p. 1.
Congressional Research Service
10

Tax Reform: An Overview of Proposals in the 112th Congress

He believes we cannot afford to make our deficit problem worse by extending the Bush tax
cuts for the wealthiest Americans.
He also supports efforts to build on the Fiscal Commission’s goal of reducing tax
expenditures so that there is enough savings to both lower rates and lower the deficit. Reform
should be designed to ask more of those who can afford it while protecting the middle class
and promoting economic growth.
In addition, as he explained in the State of the Union, the President is continuing his effort to
reform our outdated corporate tax code to enhance our economic competitiveness and
encourage investment in the United States. By eliminating loopholes, reducing distortions
and leveling the playing field in our corporate tax code, we can use the savings to lower the
corporate tax rate for the first time in 25 years without adding to the deficit.21

Author Contact Information

James M. Bickley

Specialist in Public Finance
jbickley@crs.loc.gov, 7-7794



21 Ibid., p. 5.
Congressional Research Service
11