.

Medicaid: A Primer
Elicia J. Herz
Specialist in Health Care Financing
July 15, 2010
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
RL33202
CRS Report for Congress
P
repared for Members and Committees of Congress
c11173008

.
Medicaid: A Primer

Summary
In existence for 45 years, Medicaid is a means-tested entitlement program that finances the
delivery of primary and acute medical services as well as long-term care to more than 68 million
people in FY2010. The estimated annual cost to the federal and state governments was roughly
$381 billion in FY2009. In comparison, the Medicare program, which provided health care
benefits to 46 million seniors and certain persons with disabilities cost nearly $511 billion in
FY2009.
Each state designs and administers its own version of Medicaid under broad federal rules. State
variability is the rule rather than the exception in terms of eligibility levels, covered services, and
how those services are reimbursed and delivered. The new health reform law makes both
mandatory and optional changes along these dimensions for the Medicaid program.
This report describes the basic elements of Medicaid, focusing on federal rules governing who is
eligible, what services are covered, how the program is financed and how beneficiaries share in
the cost of care, how providers are paid, and the role of special waivers in expanding eligibility
and modifying benefits. Basic program statistics are also provided. Finally, recent legislative
changes at the federal level that affect Medicaid in significant ways are also described.

Congressional Research Service

.
Medicaid: A Primer

Contents
Who Is Eligible for Medicaid? .................................................................................................... 1
What Benefits Does Medicaid Cover? ......................................................................................... 4
Traditional Medicaid Benefits ............................................................................................... 4
Benchmark Benefit Packages ................................................................................................ 6
How Is Medicaid Financed? ........................................................................................................ 8
Do Beneficiaries Pay for Medicaid Services? .............................................................................. 9
Service-Based Cost Sharing Under Traditional Medicaid....................................................... 9
Participation-Related Cost Sharing Under Traditional Medicaid .......................................... 10
Beneficiary Cost Sharing Under DRA ................................................................................. 10
How Are Providers Paid Under Medicaid? ................................................................................ 11
How Do Medicaid Research and Demonstration Waivers Work? ............................................... 12
Some Medicaid Statistics .......................................................................................................... 13
Medicaid Resources .................................................................................................................. 14

Contacts
Author Contact Information ...................................................................................................... 14

Congressional Research Service

.
Medicaid: A Primer

edicaid was enacted in 1965 in the same legislation that created the Medicare program
(i.e., the Social Security Amendments of 1965; P.L. 89-97). It grew out of and replaced
M two earlier programs of federal grants to states that provided medical care to welfare
recipients and the elderly. It has expanded in additional directions since that time, most recently
with the enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).1
In the federal budget, Medicaid is an entitlement program that constitutes a large share of
mandatory spending. Two other federally supported health programs—Medicare and the
Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)—are also entitlements,2 and are also components of
mandatory spending in the federal budget. All three programs finance the delivery of certain
health care services to specific populations. While Medicare is financed by the federal
government and premiums paid by beneficiaries, both Medicaid and CHIP are jointly financed by
the federal and state governments. Federal Medicaid spending is open-ended, with total outlays
dependent on the generosity of state Medicaid programs. In contrast, CHIP is a capped federal
grant to states.
Even though Medicaid is an entitlement program in federal budget terms, states choose whether
to participate, and all 50 states do so. If they choose to participate, states must follow federal rules
in order to receive federal reimbursement that offsets most of their Medicaid costs. Although this
report describes federal Medicaid requirements, a number of these requirements can be waived,
with approval from the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS), as discussed in the
subsection on research and demonstration waivers.
Who Is Eligible for Medicaid?
The federal Medicaid statute (Title XIX of the Social Security Act) defines more than 50 distinct
population groups as being potentially eligible. Historically, Medicaid eligibility was subject to
categorical restrictions that generally limited coverage to the elderly, persons with disabilities (as
generally defined under the federal Supplemental Security Income Program, or SSI3), members of
families with dependent children, certain other pregnant women and children, certain women with
breast or cervical cancer, and uninsured individuals with tuberculosis. Recent changes in law
(described below) provide eligibility for nonelderly, childless adults who do not fit into these
traditional categories.
In addition, to qualify for Medicaid coverage, applicants’ income (e.g., wages, Social Security
benefits) and sometimes their resources, or assets (e.g., value of a car, savings accounts), must
meet program financial requirements. Medicaid began with eligibility based on receipt of cash
assistance under other programs such as Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), or the
SSI program, as noted above. In recent years, Medicaid has shifted largely to eligibility based on

1 For more information on the Medicaid changes under PPACA, see CRS Report R41210, Medicaid and the State
Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Provisions in PPACA
, coordinated by Julie Stone.
2 The term “entitlement” has two meanings in this context. Individuals who meet state eligibility requirements, which
must also meet federal minimum requirements, are entitled to Medicaid. Similarly, individuals who meet federal
eligibility requirements are entitled to Medicare. In contrast, states that meet certain federal requirements are entitled,
or have access to, federal CHIP grants. All states have qualified for CHIP. There is no individual entitlement under
CHIP.
3 SSI provides cash assistance to the elderly and adults with certain disabilities that significantly restrict their ability to
be gainfully employed. In the case of children, disabilities must result in marked and severe functional limitations.
Congressional Research Service
1

.
Medicaid: A Primer

income, and most enrollees do not receive cash assistance. However, states are still required to
apply rules used by their former AFDC programs4 or the federal SSI program when determining
countable income for Medicaid. Generally, SSI rules are applicable to the elderly and those with
disabilities, while AFDC rules are applicable to other groups. These programs differ on what
counts as income and how much is disregarded (ignored) for determining financial eligibility for
Medicaid. States have the option to apply additional disregards in order to reduce countable
income.
Some eligibility groups are mandatory, meaning that all states with a Medicaid program must
cover them; others are optional. Examples of groups that states must provide Medicaid to include:
• poor families that meet the financial requirements (based on family size) of the
former AFDC cash assistance program,5
• families losing Medicaid eligibility due to increased earnings from work who
receive up to 12 months of Medicaid coverage,
• pregnant women and children through age 18 with family income below 133% of
the federal poverty level (FPL),6
• poor individuals with disabilities or poor individuals over age 64 who qualify for
cash assistance under the SSI program,7
• certain groups of legal permanent resident immigrants (e.g., refugees for the first
seven years after entry into the U.S.; asylees for the first seven years after asylum
is granted; lawful permanent aliens with 40 quarters of creditable coverage under
Social Security; immigrants who are honorably discharged U.S. military
veterans) who meet all other financial and categorical Medicaid eligibility
requirements,
• beginning in 2014, certain individuals who age out of foster care, up to age 26,
who do not qualify under one of the other mandatory groups noted above,
• beginning in 2014, or sooner at state option, all non-elderly, non-pregnant adults
with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) below 133% FPL who do not
qualify under one of the other mandatory groups noted above.
Coverage of certain persons aging out of foster care and non-elderly, non-pregnant adults was
added to the Medicaid statute by PPACA. In June 2010, Connecticut became the first state to
receive approval to expand Medicaid coverage to non-elderly, non-pregnant individuals; the state
extended Medicaid coverage to these individuals with income up to 56% FPL, as allowed under

4 Under the 1996 welfare reform law, AFDC was replaced with the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
program.
5 AFDC income standards are well below the federal poverty level, but states can modify (liberalize or potentially
further restrict) these criteria. Although TANF recipients are not automatically eligible for Medicaid, some states have
aligned income rules for TANF and Medicaid, thus facilitating Medicaid coverage for some TANF recipients.
6 For example, in 2010, the FPL for a family of four is $22,050—133% of FPL for such a family would equal
$29,326.50. See http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/09extension.shtml.
7 Some states use income, resource and disability standards that differ from current SSI standards.
Congressional Research Service
2

.
Medicaid: A Primer

PPACA prior to 2014.8 Later in June 2010, the District of Columbia also received approval to
cover such individuals with income up to 133% FPL with no asset test.9
Examples of groups that states may choose to cover under Medicaid prior to 2014 include:
• parents with income above AFDC financial levels,
• pregnant women and infants with family income exceeding 133% FPL up to
185% FPL,
• individuals with disabilities and people over age 64 whose income exceeds the
SSI level (about 75% FPL nationwide) up to 100% FPL,
• children with disabilities whose family income is above the financial standards
for SSI but below 300% FPL,
• individuals who require institutional care (in a nursing facility or other medical
institution) whose income exceeds the SSI level up to 300% of the applicable SSI
payment standard (based on family size) or roughly 221% FPL,
• the “medically needy” are those individuals in categories selected by the state
(e.g., over 64, disabled, families with dependent children) whose income is too
high to qualify as categorically needy, but have countable income up to 133⅓%
of the maximum payment amount applicable under states’ former AFDC
programs.10 For states that elect the medically needy option, coverage must be
provided to certain pregnant women and children under age 18 who otherwise
meet the applicable financial criteria. Medically needy coverage is particularly
important for the elderly and persons with disabilities, since this pathway allows
deductions for medical expenses that lower the amount of income counted in the
determination of financial eligibility for Medicaid.
• legal immigrants after their first five years (or earlier for children and pregnant
women) in this country; and
• beginning in 2014, all non-elderly, non-pregnant individuals with MAGI above
133% FPL,11
As of January 1, 2014, modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) rules will apply to most
Medicaid enrollees. Also, no asset test will apply. MAGI is defined as the Internal Revenue
Code’s Adjusted Gross Income (AGI, which reflects a number of deductions, including trade and
business deductions, losses from sale of property, and alimony payments), increased (if
applicable) by tax-exempt interest and income earned by U.S. citizens or residents living abroad.
Income thresholds for determining Medicaid eligibility must be adjusted to account for the fact
that some individuals could lose eligibility under these new rules. These implementation details
are still to be worked out. In addition, for certain eligibility groups, states must disregard dollar
amounts equal to 5% FPL, and states are prohibited from applying additional income disregards.

8 For additional details, see http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2010pres/06/20100618h.html. States can choose an income
level up to 133% FPL.
9 For additional details, see http://www.cms.gov/MedicaidGenInfo/downloads/DC-10-03-Ltr.pdf
10 This limit can be raised or lowered based on specific provisions in the 1996 welfare reform legislation.
11 It is unclear how many states will elect this option given that, beginning in 2014, these individuals will be eligible for
coverage through state-based exchanges.
Congressional Research Service
3

.
Medicaid: A Primer

MAGI will not apply for specific exempted populations (e.g., those eligible for Medicaid based
on their eligibility through another federal or state program such as SSI or foster care, the elderly,
certain disabled individuals, and medically needy populations). For such exempted populations,
AFDC and SSI income counting rules will continue to apply.
What Benefits Does Medicaid Cover?
Prior to 2006, in general, states provided mandatory and state-selected optional benefits to their
Medicaid beneficiaries. In this report, these are referred to as “traditional” benefits. Beginning in
2006, as an alterative to traditional benefits, states were given the option to provide what are
called “benchmark” benefit packages to certain Medicaid subpopulations. These plans can also
be limited to substate areas. When certain conditions are met, states can also offer premium
assistance for health insurance offered through employer-based plans for Medicaid children and
their parents.
Traditional Medicaid Benefits
Like eligibility, federal rules require states with Medicaid programs to cover certain benefits
under the traditional Medicaid program. Certain other services may also be offered at state option.
States define the specific features of each covered benefit within four broad federal guidelines:
• Each service must be sufficient in “amount, duration, and scope” to reasonably
achieve its purpose. States may place appropriate limits on a service based on
such criteria as medical necessity.
• Within a state, services available to the various categorically needy groups12 must
be equal in amount, duration, and scope. These requirements are called the
“comparability” rule.
• With certain exceptions, the amount, duration, and scope of benefits must be the
same statewide, referred to as the “statewideness” rule.
• With certain exceptions, beneficiaries must have “freedom of choice” among
health care providers or managed care entities participating in Medicaid.
Standard benefits identified in the federal statute and regulations include a wide range of medical
care and services. Some benefits are specific items, such as eyeglasses and prosthetic devices.
Other benefits are defined in terms of specific types of providers (e.g., physicians, hospitals)
whose array of services are designated as coverable under Medicaid. Still other benefits define
specific types of service (e.g., family planning services and supplies, pregnancy-related services)
that may be delivered by any qualified medical provider that participates in Medicaid.
Examples of benefits that are mandatory for most Medicaid groups include:
• inpatient hospital services (excluding services for mental disease),

12 Categorically needy groups include families with children, the elderly, persons with disabilities, and certain other
pregnant women and children who meet former AFDC- and SSI-related financial standards, or have income below
specified percentages of the FPL. Beginning in 2014, or earlier at state option, this group will also include non-elderly,
non-pregnant adults.
Congressional Research Service
4

.
Medicaid: A Primer

• services provided by federally qualified health centers,
• beginning in March of 2010, services provided by free-standing birthing centers,
• laboratory and x-ray services,
• physician services,
• pregnancy-related services,
• beginning in October 2011, smoking cessation services for pregnant women (i.e.,
counseling and pharmacotherapy) with no beneficiary cost-sharing,
• nursing facility services for individuals age 21 and over, and
• home health care for those entitled to nursing home care.
Examples of optional benefits for most Medicaid groups include:
• prescribed drugs (covered by all states),
• routine dental care,
• physician-directed clinic services,
• other licensed practitioners (e.g., optometrists, podiatrists, psychologists),
• beginning in 2013, certain preventive care services recommended by the U.S.
Preventive Services Task Force and adult immunizations recommended by the
Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices,
• inpatient psychiatric care for the elderly and for individuals under age 21,
• nursing facility services for individuals under age 21,
• beginning in 2011, consumer-directed personal care attendant services for
persons with income up to 150% FPL, or higher when certain conditions are met,
• physical therapy, and
• prosthetic devices.

The optional traditional benefits offered vary across states. In addition, the breadth of coverage
for a given benefit can and does vary from state to state, even for mandatory services. For
example, states may place different limits on the amount of inpatient hospital services a
beneficiary can receive in a year (e.g., up to 15 inpatient days per year in one state versus
unlimited inpatient days in another state)—again, as long as applicable requirements are met
regarding comparability, statewideness and sufficiency of amount, duration and scope within the
state. Exceptions to stated limits may be permitted under circumstances defined by the state.
The federal Medicaid statute also specifies special benefits or special rules regarding certain
benefits for targeted populations. For example:
• Most Medicaid children under age 21 are entitled to Early and Periodic
Screening, Diagnostic and Treatment (EPSDT) services. Under EPSDT, children
receive well-child visits, immunizations, laboratory tests, and other screening
services at regular intervals. In addition, medical care that is necessary to correct
Congressional Research Service
5

.
Medicaid: A Primer

or ameliorate identified defects, physical and mental illness, and other conditions
must be provided, including optional services that states do not otherwise cover
in their Medicaid programs.
Unauthorized aliens (i.e., illegal aliens, foreign nationals who are not lawfully
present in the United States) are ineligible for Medicaid. Such individuals who
meet the eligibility requirements for Medicaid, but are ineligible due to
immigration status, may receive Medicaid coverage for emergency conditions
(i.e., emergency Medicaid) only, which includes costs associated with emergency
labor and delivery for pregnant women and excludes costs for organ transplants.
• Special benefit rules apply to optional medically needy populations. States may
offer a more restrictive benefit package than is provided to categorically needy
populations, but at a minimum, must offer (1) prenatal, delivery and postpartum
services for pregnant women, (2) ambulatory services as defined in the state
Medicaid plan for individuals under 18 and those entitled to institutional services,
and (3) home health services for individuals entitled to nursing facility care.13
• State Medicaid programs must pay Medicare cost-sharing expenses (e.g.,
Medicare premiums and, in some cases, deductibles and co-insurance) for certain
low-income individuals eligible for both programs, often called “dual eligibles.”
• Under section 1915(c) of Medicaid law, the Secretary may waive certain
statutory requirements to allow states to offer comprehensive long-term care
(LTC) service packages to people living in home and community-based (HCB)
settings who would otherwise require an institutional level of care. Medicaid law
also gives states the authority, under section 1915(i), to offer LTC services to
persons residing in HCB settings with a lower level-of-care need. Further, a
variety of other state plan benefit options are available to states to cover personal
care attendant services (e.g., sections 1915(j) and 1915(k)). Such benefits are
designed to help maximize independence, avoid unnecessary hospitalizations,
and delay or even prevent the need for institutional care.
Benchmark Benefit Packages
As an alternative to providing all of the mandatory and selected optional benefits under traditional
Medicaid, the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) gave states the option to enroll state-
specified groups in new benchmark and benchmark-equivalent benefit packages. The new
mandatory eligibility group for non-elderly adults with income under 133% FPL will be enrolled
in these plans instead of traditional Medicaid, but certain subpopulations will be exempt from
mandatory enrollment in benchmark plans (e.g., those with special health care needs).
In general, benchmark benefit packages may cover fewer benefits than traditional Medicaid, but
there are some requirements, such as coverage of EPSDT services and transportation to and from
medical providers (as per a recent regulation14), that might make them more generous than private
insurance. The benchmark options include:

13 Broader requirements apply if a state has chosen to provide coverage for medically needy persons in institutions for
mental disease and intermediate care facilities for the mentally retarded.
14 Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicaid Program: States
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
6

.
Medicaid: A Primer

• the Blue Cross/Blue Shield standard provider plan under the Federal Employees
Health Benefits Program (FEHBP),
• a plan offered to state employees,
• the largest commercial HMO in the state, and
• other Secretary-approved coverage appropriate for the targeted population.
Benchmark-equivalent coverage must have the same actuarial value as one of the benchmark
plans identified above. Such coverage must include (1) inpatient and outpatient hospital services,
(2) physician services, (3) lab and x-ray services, (4) emergency care, (5) well-child care,
including immunizations, (6) prescribed drugs, and (7) other appropriate preventive care
(designated by the Secretary). Such coverage must also include at least 75% of the actuarial value
of coverage under the benchmark plan for vision care and hearing services (if any).
For any child under age 21 in one of the major mandatory and optional Medicaid eligibility
groups, benchmark and benchmark-equivalent coverage must include EPSDT. Also, Medicaid
beneficiaries enrolled in such coverage must have access to services provided by rural health
clinics and federally qualified health centers.
Some states have experience with benchmark benefits under Medicaid. According to a recent
regulation, CMS has approved 10 benchmark packages, eight of which are classified as
Secretary-approved coverage.15 Most offer traditional state plan benefits plus additional services,
such as personal care, personal assistance, and disease management services even though
benchmark coverage is generally associated with fewer benefits.
Starting in 2014, both benchmark and benchmark-equivalent packages must cover at least
essential health benefits that will also apply to plans in the private individual and small group
markets. There are 10 such essential health benefits: (1) ambulatory services, (2) emergency
services, (3) hospitalization, (4) maternity and newborn care, (5) mental health and substance
abuse services, (6) prescribed drugs, (7) rehabilitative and habilitative services and devices, (8)
lab services, (9) preventive and wellness services and chronic disease management, and (10)
pediatric services, including oral and vision care. Many of these essential health benefits are
already coverable under benchmark packages. All benchmark packages must also cover family
planning services.
Mental health parity, as defined in the Public Health Service Act, generally means that, under a
given insurance plan, coverage of mental health services (if offered) should be on par with
coverage of medical and surgical services in terms of the treatment limitations (e.g., amount,
duration and scope of benefits), financial requirements (e.g., beneficiary co-payments), in- and
out-of-network covered benefits, and annual and lifetime dollar limits. Managed care plans under
both traditional Medicaid and benchmark packages must comply with all federal mental health
parity requirements. Benchmark packages that are not managed care plans are only required to
comply with federal requirements for parity in treatment limitations and financial requirements.

(...continued)
Flexibility for Medicaid Benefit Packages, Final Rule, 75 Federal Register 23068 (April 30, 2010).
15 Ibid.
Congressional Research Service
7

.
Medicaid: A Primer

However, these plans are deemed to comply with federal mental health parity requirements if they
offer EPSDT, which they are statutorily required to cover.16
How Is Medicaid Financed?
The federal and state governments share the cost of Medicaid. States are reimbursed by the
federal government for a portion (the “federal share”) of a state’s Medicaid program costs.
Because Medicaid is an open-ended entitlement, there is no upper limit or cap on the amount of
federal funds a state may receive. Medicaid costs in a given state and year are primarily
determined by the expansiveness of eligibility rules and beneficiary participation, the breadth of
benefits offered, the generosity of provider reimbursement rates, and other supplemental
payments.
The state-specific federal share for benefit costs is determined by a formula set in law that
establishes higher federal shares for states with per capita personal income levels lower than the
national average (and vice versa for states with per capita personal income levels that are higher
than the national average).17 The federal share, called the federal medical assistance percentage
(FMAP), is at least 50% and can be as high as 83% (statutory maximum). For FY2011 (excluding
the temporary increase in FMAP currently in effect through December 2010), the federal share
for benefit costs ranges from 50% (in 13 states) up to 74.73% (in one state, Mississippi).
The federal match for administrative expenditures does not vary by state and is generally 50%,
but certain administrative functions have a higher federal matching rate. Functions with a 75%
federal match include, for example, survey and certification of nursing facilities, operation of a
state Medicaid fraud control unit (MFCU), and operation of an approved Medicaid management
information system (MMIS) for claims and information processing. Overall, administrative costs
represent about 5% of total Medicaid spending in a given year.
PPACA included provisions that changed certain payments to states under Medicaid. One such
provision affects disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments. States make DSH payments to
hospitals that treat large numbers of low-income and Medicaid patients. The main purpose of
these payments is to compensate hospitals for otherwise low Medicaid payments and
uncompensated care. For FY2009 forward, state DSH allotments equal the prior year amount
increased by the change in the consumer price index for all urban consumers. For FY2010, such
allotments were estimated to total about $12 billion.18 That overall amount will increase over
time under the current formula until FY2014, when there should be fewer uninsured individuals
as a result of a number of changes in insurance coverage via PPACA. Thus, in theory there may

16 For more detailed information on mental health parity under Medicaid, see CRS Report R41249, Mental Health
Parity and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010
, by Amanda K. Sarata.
17 There are a number of exceptions to the FMAP. For example, for family planning services and supplies, the federal
share is 90% for all states. In addition, the federal share is 100% for Medicaid services provided by an Indian Health
Service facility (whether operated by the IHS or certain Indian tribes or tribal organizations) to Medicaid beneficiaries.
For additional information on FMAP, see CRS Report RL32950, Medicaid: The Federal Medical Assistance
Percentage (FMAP)
, by April Grady and Chris L. Peterson.
18 Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicaid Program: Final
FY2008, Revised Preliminary FY2009, and Preliminary FY 2010 Disproportionate Share Hospital Allotments and
Final FY2008, Revised Preliminary FY2009, and Preliminary FY2010 Disproportionate Share Hospital Institutions for
Mental Disease Limits, 75 Federal Register, 21314 (April 23, 2010).
Congressional Research Service
8

.
Medicaid: A Primer

be less need for Medicaid DSH payments going forward. Under PPACA, there will be specific
reductions in overall DSH allotments by fiscal year that must be implemented by the Secretary.
These reductions will be $500 million in FY2014, $600 million for each of FY2015 and FY2016,
$1.8 billion for FY2017, $5.0 billion for FY2018, $5.6 billion for FY2019, and $4.0 billion for
FY2020.
PPACA did not specify a formula for achieving these overall reductions in federal DSH
allotments to states. Instead, the Secretary must use certain general parameters to develop a
methodology to achieve these dollar reductions.19
Do Beneficiaries Pay for Medicaid Services?
Under traditional Medicaid, states are allowed to require certain beneficiaries to share in the cost
of Medicaid services, although there are limits on (1) the amounts that states can impose, (2) the
beneficiary groups that can be required to pay, and (3) the services for which cost-sharing can be
charged. The rules for service-based cost-sharing (e.g., copayments paid to a provider at the time
of service delivery) are different from those for participation-related cost-sharing (e.g., premiums
paid by beneficiaries typically on a monthly basis independent of any services rendered).
Service-Based Cost Sharing Under Traditional Medicaid
For some groups of beneficiaries, all service-related cost sharing is prohibited unless the
prohibitions are lifted under a special waiver (see the subsection on waivers below). All service-
related cost sharing is prohibited for children under 18 years of age. Service-related cost sharing
is prohibited for pregnant women for any services that relate to the pregnancy or to any other
medical condition that may complicate pregnancy. Other examples of prohibitions on cost-sharing
include:
• services furnished to individuals who are inpatients in a hospital, or are residing
in a long term care facility or in another medical institution if the individual is
required to spend most of their income for medical care;
• services provided to Indians by an Indian health care provider or through referral
under contract health services;
• emergency services; and
• family planning services and supplies.
For most other beneficiaries and services, Medicaid programs are allowed to establish “nominal”
service-related cost sharing requirements. For example, for FY2009, the maximum permissible
nominal amounts defined in regulations ranged from $0.60 to $3.40,20 depending on the cost of
the service provided. For working individuals with disabilities who qualify for Medicaid under

19 These parameters are described in more detail in CRS Report R41210, Medicaid and the State Children’s Health
Insurance Program (CHIP) Provisions in PPACA
, coordinated by Julie Stone.
20 The effective date of the 2008 final rule for the DRA premium and cost-sharing provisions (73 Federal Register
71828; described in the next subsection) is July 1, 2010. This rule includes a medical inflation adjustment for nominal
service-related cost-sharing maximums.
Congressional Research Service
9

.
Medicaid: A Primer

eligibility pathways established by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA97) and the Ticket to
Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 (TWWIIA), service-related cost sharing
charges may be required that exceed nominal amounts as long as they are set on a sliding scale
based on income.
Under traditional Medicaid, providers cannot deny care or services based on an individual’s
ability to pay Medicaid cost-sharing amounts. In the past, some states allowed providers to refuse
to provide services to Medicaid beneficiaries who failed to make copayments, but most states did
not have specific policies on this issue.21
Participation-Related Cost Sharing Under Traditional Medicaid
Premiums and enrollment fees are generally prohibited under traditional Medicaid. Examples of
permitted exceptions include:
• For certain families losing eligibility due to increased earnings from work, states
may charge premiums but only for the final six months of transitional Medicaid
coverage.
• For pregnant women and infants with family income that exceeds 150% FPL,
states are allowed to implement nominal premiums or enrollment fees between
$1 and $19 per month, depending on family income.
• For individuals who qualify for Medicaid through the medically needy pathway,
states may implement a monthly fee as an alternative to meeting the financial
eligibility thresholds by deducting medical expenses from income (i.e., the
“spend down” method).
• For individuals who qualify under pathways for working individuals with
disabilities, states may charge premiums or enrollment fees. Fees for individuals
with a disability who qualify under the provisions of BBA97 and whose family
income does not exceed 250% FPL are charged on a sliding scale based on
income (determined by the state). Premiums charged to those who qualify under
TWWIIA, whose income is between 250% and 450% FPL, cannot exceed 7.5%
of income. (When a state covers both groups, the same cost-sharing rules must
apply.)
Beneficiary Cost Sharing Under DRA
DRA (as modified by P.L. 109-432) provided states with an alternative for Medicaid premiums
and service-related cost sharing. Under this option, states may impose premiums and cost sharing
through Medicaid state plan amendments rather than through waiver authority, subject to specific
restrictions.
In general, for individuals with income under 100% FPL:
• no premiums may be imposed,

21 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, Medicaid Cost Sharing, OEI-03-91-
01800 (July 1993), available at http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-03-91-01800.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
10

.
Medicaid: A Primer

• service-related cost sharing cannot exceed nominal amounts, and
• the total aggregate amount of all cost sharing cannot exceed 5% of monthly or
quarterly family income.
For individuals in families with income between 100 and 150% FPL:
• no premiums may be imposed,
• service-related cost sharing cannot exceed 10% of the cost of the item or service
rendered, and
• the total aggregate amount of all cost-sharing cannot exceed 5% of monthly or
quarterly family income.
For individuals in families with income above 150% FPL:
• service-related cost sharing cannot exceed 20% of the cost of the item or service
rendered, and
• the total aggregate amount of all cost-sharing (including any applicable
premiums) cannot exceed 5% of monthly or quarterly family income.

There are exemptions to DRA cost sharing for certain subgroups and services, which
generally mirror those applicable under traditional Medicaid. For example, certain
groups (e.g., some children, pregnant women, certain individuals with special needs) are
exempt from paying premiums regardless of their income. Also, certain groups and
services (e.g., preventive care for children, emergency care, family planning services) are
exempt from the service-related cost sharing.
Under the DRA option, special rules apply to cost sharing for non-preferred prescription
drugs and for emergency room copayments for non-emergency care, and as with
traditional Medicaid, such cost sharing will also be adjusted for medical inflation over
time. DRA also allowed states to condition continuing Medicaid eligibility on the
payment of premiums. Providers may also deny care for failure to pay service-related
cost sharing.
How Are Providers Paid Under Medicaid?
For the most part, states establish their own payment rates for Medicaid providers. Federal statute
requires that these rates be sufficient to enlist enough providers so that covered benefits will be
available to Medicaid beneficiaries at least to the same extent they are available to the general
population in the same geographic area. For CY2013 and CY2014 only, PPACA requires that
Medicaid payment rates for certain primary care services be raised to what Medicare pays for
these services. Also, for those two years only, the federal government will pick up the entire cost
of that increase in payments (i.e., the difference between Medicare payment rates and the existing
Medicaid payment rates as of July 1, 2009).
Medicaid regulations place restrictions on how Medicaid cost-sharing may be used in determining
provider reimbursement. States are prohibited from increasing the payments they make to
providers to offset uncollected amounts for deductibles, co-insurance, co-payments or similar
Congressional Research Service
11

.
Medicaid: A Primer

charges that the provider has waived or that are uncollectable (with the exception of providers
reimbursed by the state under Medicare reasonable cost reimbursement principles22). In addition,
if a state contracts with certain managed care organizations that do not impose the state’s
Medicaid cost-sharing requirements on their Medicaid members, the state must calculate
payments to such organizations as if those cost-sharing amounts were collected.
How Do Medicaid Research and Demonstration
Waivers Work?

Section 1115 of the Social Security Act provides the Secretary of HHS with broad authority to
conduct research and demonstration projects that further the goals of the Medicaid program (as
well as other programs, such as CHIP). Some policymakers at both the federal and state level
view Section 1115 authority as a means to restructure Medicaid coverage, control costs, and
increase state flexibility in a variety of ways. To obtain such a waiver, a state must submit
proposals outlining the terms and conditions of its waiver for approval by the federal agency that
oversees and administers the Medicaid program, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS).
Under this authority, the Secretary may waive any Medicaid requirements contained in Section
1902 of the federal Medicaid statute, including but not limited to, freedom of choice of provider,
and comparability and statewideness of benefits (as described above in the benefits section). For
example, states may obtain waivers that allow them to provide services to individuals who would
not otherwise meet Medicaid eligibility rules, cover non-Medicaid services, limit benefit
packages for certain groups, adapt programs to the special needs of particular geographic areas or
groups of recipients, or accomplish a policy goal such as to temporarily extend Medicaid in the
aftermath of a disaster (as was done in New York City after the September 11 terrorist attacks and
in Gulf Coast states after Hurricane Katrina).
Approved waivers are deemed to be part of a state’s Medicaid plan, and thus, the federal share of
the costs for such waivers is determined by the FMAP formula (described earlier). Unlike
traditional Medicaid, waiver guidance23 specifies that the costs of 1115 waivers must be budget
neutral
over the life of the program. To meet this requirement, estimated spending under the
waiver cannot exceed the estimated cost of the state’s existing Medicaid program under current
law requirements (either on a per capita or aggregate basis). For example, states may move
certain existing Medicaid populations into managed care arrangements and use the savings
accrued from that action to finance coverage of otherwise ineligible individuals under an
approved waiver.
There are specific limits and restrictions on how a state may operate a waiver program. For
example, such waivers must not limit mandatory services for the mandatory pregnant women and
children eligibility groups. Another provision specifies restrictions on cost-sharing that may be

22 For providers reimbursed under such principles, the state may increase its payment to offset uncollected Medicaid
cost-sharing amounts that are bad debts for such providers. See 42 CFR 447.57 and 42 CFR 447.58.
23 Medicaid Program; Demonstration Proposals Pursuant to Section 1115(a) of the Social Security Act; Policies and
Procedures, 59 Federal Register 49249 (September 27, 1994).
Congressional Research Service
12

.
Medicaid: A Primer

imposed under waivers. PPACA included transparency requirements to facilitate public notice
and input for such waivers.
Some Medicaid Statistics
In FY2010, a total of 68.2 million people were estimated to be enrolled in Medicaid at some time
during the year (excluding the territories). Nearly one-half of these beneficiaries (33.9 million)
were children, and 18.2 million were adults in families with dependent children. There were also
10.3 million individuals with disabilities and 5.8 million people over the age of 65 enrolled in
Medicaid that year.24 The latest published estimate of total Medicaid spending available from
CMS, including the costs of benefits and program administration for the federal and state
governments combined, was $381.3 billion for FY2009.25
Across the nation, traditional Medicaid covers a very diverse population and, compared to both
Medicare and employer-sponsored health care plans, offers the broadest array of medical care and
related services available in the United States today. Different groups under Medicaid have very
different service utilization patterns. These patterns result in large differences in the proportion of
total benefit expenditures by group.26 For example, for FY2007:
• While the majority of enrollees were children without disabilities (nearly half),
such children accounted for only about 18% of Medicaid’s total expenditures on
benefits. Most of the expenditures for such children are typically for primary and
acute care in the fee-for-service setting, as well as for managed care premiums.
• The next-largest beneficiary group—adults without disabilities in families with
dependent children—accounted for about 27% of all enrollees, but only about
13% of benefit expenditures. Like children, primary and acute fee-for-service
care and managed care premiums account for the majority of these costs.
• In contrast, individuals with disabilities represented about 15% of Medicaid
enrollees, but this group accounted for the largest share of Medicaid expenditures
for benefits (about 40%) of all groups. Most of the costs for persons with
disabilities are typically for institutional and non-institutional long-term care
services, primary and acute fee-for-service care, and outpatient prescription
drugs.
• Finally, the elderly represented about 9% of Medicaid enrollees, but about 23%
of all expenditures for benefits. For the aged, the majority of costs are usually for
long-term care and outpatient prescription drugs.
While these statistics vary somewhat from year to year and state to state, the patterns described
above generally hold true.

24 Beneficiary statistics for FY2010 were taken from Table 1.16, 2010 CMS Statistics, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services.
25 Total Medicaid spending for FY2009 was taken from Table III.2, 2009 CMS Statistics, U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services.
26 Medicaid payments by eligibility group for FY2007 were taken from Table III.10, 2010 CMS Statistics, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services.
Congressional Research Service
13

.
Medicaid: A Primer

Since 2006, Medicaid beneficiaries who are also eligible for Medicare (i.e., the elderly and
certain individuals with disabilities) receive their outpatient prescription drugs through the
Medicare prescription drug benefit (known as Medicare Part D) instead of through Medicaid. As
a result, Medicaid’s drug costs for these populations have been considerably reduced.
Medicaid Resources
For more information on Medicaid, there are several CRS reports listed below that may be of
interest. This list will be updated as additional existing and new reports incorporate Medicaid
changes made under health reform (PPACA).
CRS Report R41210, Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
Provisions in PPACA

CRS Report RL32950, Medicaid: The Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP)
CRS Report R40144, State Medicaid and CHIP Coverage of Noncitizens
CRS Report RS22629, Medicaid Citizenship Documentation
CRS Report R40226, P.L. 111-3: The Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act
of 2009

CRS Report R40223, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA, P.L. 111-5): Title
V, Medicaid Provisions


Author Contact Information

Elicia J. Herz

Specialist in Health Care Financing
eherz@crs.loc.gov, 7-1377


Congressional Research Service
14