Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection
and Affordable Care Act (PPACA): Summary
and Timeline
Patricia A. Davis, Coordinator
Specialist in Health Care Financing
Jim Hahn
Analyst in Health Care Financing
Geoffrey J. Hoffman
Analyst in Health Care Financing
Paulette C. Morgan
Specialist in Health Care Financing
Julie Stone
Specialist in Health Care Financing
Sibyl Tilson
Specialist in Health Care Financing
June 30, 2010
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
R41196
CRS Report for Congress
P
repared for Members and Committees of Congress
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Summary
Medicare is a federal program that pays for covered health services for most persons 65 years old
and older and for most permanently disabled individuals under the age of 65. The rising cost of
health care, the impact of the aging baby boomer generation, and declining revenues in a
weakened economy continue to challenge the program’s ability to provide quality and effective
health services to its 45 million beneficiaries in a financially sustainable manner.
On March 23, 2010, the President signed into law H.R. 3590, the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA; P.L. 111-148), as passed by the Senate on December 24, 2009, and
the House on March 21, 2010. The new law will, among other things, make numerous statutory
changes to the Medicare program. On March 30, 2010, the President signed into law H.R. 4872,
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (the “Reconciliation Act,” or HCERA;
P.L. 111-152), which modifies a number of Medicare provisions in PPACA and adds several new
provisions.
This report, one of a series of CRS products on PPACA and the Reconciliation Act, examines the
Medicare related provisions in these Acts. Estimates from CBO on PPACA and the Reconciliation
Act indicate that net reductions in Medicare direct spending will reach approximately $390
billion from FY2010 to FY2019. Major savings are expected from constraining Medicare’s
annual payment increases for certain providers, tying maximum Medicare Advantage payments
near or below spending in fee-for-service Medicare, reducing payments to hospitals that serve a
large number of low-income patients, creating an Independent Payment Advisory Board to make
changes in Medicare payment rates, and modifying the high-income threshold adjustment for Part
B premiums. A new Hospital Insurance tax for high-wage earners will also raise approximately
$87 billion over 10 years, and a new Medicare tax on net investment income, added by the
Reconciliation Act, is expected to raise an additional $123 billion over 10 years.
Other provisions in PPACA address more systemic issues, such as increasing the efficiency and
quality of Medicare services and strengthening program integrity. For example, PPACA requires
the establishment of a national, voluntary pilot program that will bundle payments for physician,
hospital, and post-acute care services with the goal of improving patient care and reducing
spending. Another provision adjusts payments to hospitals for readmissions related to certain
potentially preventable conditions. In addition, PPACA subjects providers and suppliers to
enhanced screening before allowing them to participate in the Medicare program, and both
PPACA and the Reconciliation Act increase funding for anti-fraud activities.
PPACA also improves some benefits provided to Medicare beneficiaries. For instance, Medicare
prescription drug program enrollees will receive a 50% discount off the price of brand-name
drugs during the coverage gap (the “doughnut hole”) starting in 2011, and the coverage gap will
be phased out by 2020. Other provisions expand assistance for some low-income beneficiaries
enrolled in the Medicare drug program, and eliminate beneficiary copayments for certain
preventive care services.
Congressional Research Service
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Score.................................................................................. 2
Payment Rate Changes Affecting Medicare Fee-for-Service Providers......................................... 4
Hospitals and Other Part A Providers..................................................................................... 5
Acute Care Hospitals ...................................................................................................... 5
Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) .................................................................................... 6
Home Health Agencies (HHAs) ...................................................................................... 7
Physicians and Other Part B Providers .................................................................................. 9
Payment and Administrative Changes Affecting the Medicare Advantage Program.................... 10
Changes Affecting Medicare’s Prescription Drug Benefit .......................................................... 12
Efforts to Improve the Efficiency and Quality of Health Care Services Provided Under
Medicare................................................................................................................................ 13
Changes to Address Medicare Sustainability ............................................................................. 14
Changes to Address Fraud, Waste, and Abuse ............................................................................ 15
Concluding Observations .......................................................................................................... 16
Figures
Figure 1. Estimates of Medicare Spending FY2010-FY2019 ....................................................... 3
Tables
Table B-1. Timeline for Update Reductions Including Productivity Adjustments, by
Provider ................................................................................................................................. 86
Table C-1. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—Prior to 2010 ............................................. 91
Table C-2. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2010 .................................................... 91
Table C-3. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2011 .................................................. 102
Table C-4. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2012 .................................................. 111
Table C-5. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2013 .................................................. 116
Table C-6. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2014 .................................................. 120
Table C-7. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2015 .................................................. 124
Table C-8. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2016 .................................................. 126
Table C-9. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2017 .................................................. 128
Table C-10. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2018 ................................................ 130
Table C-11. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2019 ................................................ 131
Table C-12. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2020 ................................................ 131
Table C-13. Unspecified Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline.............................................. 132
Congressional Research Service
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Appendixes
Appendix A. Selected Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 ........................................ 18
Appendix B. Timeline for Update Reductions Including Productivity Adjustments, by
Provider Type......................................................................................................................... 86
Appendix C. Implementation Timeline of Medicare Provisions in PPACA................................. 90
Appendix D. List of Acronyms................................................................................................ 134
Contacts
Author Contact Information .................................................................................................... 136
Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................. 136
Congressional Research Service
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Introduction
On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed into law comprehensive health care reform
legislation, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA; P.L. 111-148), as passed by
the Senate on December 24, 2009, and by the House of Representatives on March 21, 2010. The
Act contains numerous provisions affecting Medicare payments, payment rules, covered benefits,
and the delivery of care. On March 30, 2010, the President signed into law H.R. 4872, the Health
Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 (the Reconciliation Act, or HCERA;
P.L. 111-152), as passed by both the Senate and the House on March 25, 2010. The Reconciliation
Act makes changes to a number of Medicare-related provisions in PPACA and adds several new
provisions.
Prior to the enactment of the health care reform legislation, CBO estimated that total mandatory
annual expenditures for Medicare would grow from $501 billion in 2009 to $943 billion in 2019.1
Cumulative spending for FY2010 to FY2019 was expected to exceed $7 trillion. CBO estimates
on the Medicare-related provisions in PPACA and the Reconciliation Act indicate that absent
interaction effects, net reductions in Medicare direct spending will reach approximately
$390 billion over the FY2010-FY2019 period.
PPACA includes 10 titles. This report discusses selected provisions in Titles II, III, IV, V, VI, IX,
and X in PPACA concerning payment and program modifications to Medicare’s fee-for-service
program, the Medicare Advantage (MA), and outpatient prescription drug programs; efforts to
reform Medicare’s payment methods; program integrity changes to address fraud, waste, and
abuse; and other miscellaneous Medicare changes. Provisions that modify Medicare’s graduate
medical education payments to teaching hospitals, some quality measurement efforts, and other
public health initiatives are not covered in this report.2
The Reconciliation Act includes two titles. The first title contains provisions related to health care
and revenues. Subtitle B of Title I contains provisions that modify provisions in PPACA related to
Medicare fee-for-service, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare outpatient prescription drug
programs. Subtitle D contains provisions related to reducing waste, fraud, and abuse in Medicare.
Subtitle E contains revenue related provisions including a provision that makes changes to the
Medicare tax provision in PPACA. The second title includes amendments to the Higher Education
Act of 1965, which authorizes most of the federal programs involving postsecondary education.
This report also addresses how the Reconciliation Act changed, or added to, Medicare-related
provisions in PPACA.
The body of this report begins with a discussion of the financial impact on the Medicare program
by PPACA and the Reconciliation Act as estimated by CBO (the CBO score), then provides an
overview of Medicare changes by provider type and program, followed by a brief discussion of
the changes to address efficiencies and quality in Medicare, efforts to address long-term Medicare
financing, and program integrity changes.3 Appendix A provides an overview of the majority of
1 CBO’s Baseline Projections of Medicare Spending, March 2009, http://www.cbo.gov/budget/factsheets/2009b/
medicare.pdf.
2 Those provisions are discussed in CRS Report R40943, Public Health, Workforce, Quality, and Related Provisions in
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148), coordinated by C. Stephen Redhead and Erin D.
Williams.
3 Background information on the Medicare program can be found in the CRS Report R40425, Medicare Primer.
Congressional Research Service
1
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Medicare-related provisions in PPACA and the Reconciliation Act, including a brief description
of the law prior to enactment, a description of the provision, and where possible, the associated
CBO score for each provision. Title X provisions of PPACA and provisions added by the
Reconciliation Act are incorporated within the subject appropriate titles. Appendix B contains a
timeline for provider payment update reductions including productivity adjustments (described in
“Payment Rate Changes Affecting Medicare Fee-for-Service Providers”). Appendix C contains a
timeline of the effective, start, or due dates of the Medicare provisions described in this report. A
glossary of common acronyms used in body of the report and in the timeline appears in
Appendix D.
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) Score
On March 20, 2010, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Joint Committee on
Taxation (JCT) issued cost estimates of PPACA as amended by the Reconciliation Act.4 Their
analyses provide estimates of the direct spending and revenue effects of the combined pieces of
legislation.
CBO estimates that the provisions in PPACA as amended by the Reconciliation Act that affect the
Medicare, Medicaid, the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and other federal
programs will reduce direct spending by $511 billion over the FY2010-FY2019 period.5 Medicare
(absent interaction effects) accounts for approximately $390 billion of the reduction.6 Total
Medicare reductions in direct spending over the 10-year period are estimated to be about $460
billion, but these reductions are offset by Medicare payment increases of close to $70 billion.7
Estimates of annual Medicare spending from FY2010 through FY2019 under PPACA and the
Reconciliation Act, and under prior law (“baseline”) are illustrated in Figure 1.
4 The CBO score on PPACA combined with the Reconciliation Act, may be found at http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/
113xx/doc11379/Manager'sAmendmenttoReconciliationProposal.pdf. The JCT score may be found at
http://www.jct.gov/publications.html?func=startdown&id=3672.
5 The estimated overall effect of the proposed legislation is a net decrease in the federal budget deficit of $143 billion
over the FY2010-FY2019 period. The projected 10-year cost of increasing insurance coverage of $788 billion is offset
by the net spending decrease of $511 billion and by revenue provisions that are estimated to raise $420 billion over the
same period.
6 CRS analysis of CBO March 20, 2010, estimates of the effects of PPACA and the Reconciliation Act combined
(http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/113xx/doc11379/Manager'sAmendmenttoReconciliationProposal.pdf).
7 CBO expenditure projections for PPACA do not include all of the discretionary costs associated with the legislation.
CBO expects Department of Health and Human Services costs to increase at least $5 billion to $10 billion over 10
years.
Congressional Research Service
2
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Figure 1. Estimates of Medicare Spending FY2010-FY2019
Prior Law and PPACA as Amended by the Reconciliation Act
1000
900
800
700
600
ns)
llio
500
n bi
400
$ (i
300
Baseline Medicare Spending
200
Spending Under PPACA and
100
HCERA
0
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Source: CBO Medicare Baseline, March 2009; CRS analysis of CBO Cost Estimates for the PPACA as amended
by the Reconciliation Act, March 20, 2010.
As noted by CBO, the provisions that are expected to result in the largest savings include the
following:
• Permanent reductions in the annual updates to Medicare’s fee-for-service
payment rates (other than physicians’ services) will account for an estimated
budgetary savings of $196.3 billion over 10 years.8
• Tying maximum payment rates in the Medicare Advantage program closer to
spending in fee-for-service Medicare (or below that level) will account for an
estimated $135 billion in savings (before interactions) over 10 years.
• Reducing Medicare payments to hospitals that serve a large number of low-
income patients, known as disproportionate share (DSH) hospitals, is expected to
decrease expenditures by about $22 billion.
• Modifying the high-income adjustment for Part B premiums is projected to save
$25 billion over 10 years.
• Creating an Independent Payment Advisory Board to make changes in Medicare
payment rates is expected to save approximately $16 billion over 10 years.
Additionally, a new Hospital Insurance tax on taxable wages over $200,000 per year for single
filers ($250,000 for joint filers) is expected to raise $87 billion from FY2013 through FY2019,
and a new tax on investment income is projected to raise an additional $123 billion over 10 years.
CBO estimates that Medicare spending under health care reform legislation will increase more
slowly over the next 20 years compared to the past 20 years—a 6% average annual rate compared
8 This estimate excludes interaction effects including the impact on these reductions to payments to Medicare
Advantage plans and on the collection of Part B premiums.
Congressional Research Service
3
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
to the prior 8%.9 CBO notes, however, that the estimates are subject to uncertainty. For example,
the savings rate assumed that the sustainable growth rate (SGR) mechanism that constrains
Medicare physician payment rates would go back into effect in 2010; at the time the estimate was
made, physicians were facing an approximate 21% cut in payments.10 The longer-term projections
also assume that the Independent Payment Advisory Board established by PPACA will be
effective in reducing costs. CBO was not able to determine whether the reduction in the growth
rate would be achieved through greater efficiencies in the delivery of health care or if the
payment reductions would lead to lower quality of care.11
Payment Rate Changes Affecting Medicare Fee-for-
Service Providers
Medicare is a federal program that pays for covered health services for most persons 65 years of
age and older and for most permanently disabled individuals under the age of 65. It consists of
four parts, each responsible for paying for different benefits, subject to different eligibility criteria
and financing mechanisms.12 Under traditional Medicare, Part A and Part B services are typically
paid on a fee-for-service basis (each service or group of services provided to a patient is
reimbursed through a separate payment) using different prospective payment systems (PPS) or
fee schedules.13 Certain other services are paid on the basis of reasonable costs or reasonable
charges.
In general, each year, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issues regulations
to set Medicare’s payment rates to specific providers, physicians, practitioners and suppliers for
the upcoming year. For instance, the program provides for annual updates of Medicare payments
to reflect inflation and other factors. In some cases, these updates are linked to the consumer price
index for all urban consumers (CPI-U) or to a provider-specific market basket (MB) index, which
measures the change in the price of goods and services purchased by the provider to produce a
9 December 19, 2009, CBO analysis of Senate H.R. 3590; http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/doc10868/12-19-
Reid_Letter_Managers_Correction_Noted.pdf.
10 Subsequent to CBO’s March 20, 2010, estimate, Congress has taken action several times to delay these payment
reductions. For more detail on the SGR system and recent legislation affecting Medicare physician payments, see CRS
Report R40907, Medicare Physician Payment Updates and the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) System, by Jim Hahn.
11 In an April 22, 2010, report, “Estimated Financial Effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as
Amended,” the CMS Office of the Actuary (OACT) suggests that long-term savings from the productivity adjustments
may be unrealistic. OACT estimates that approximately 15% of Part A providers could become unprofitable within the
10-year projection period as a result of productivity adjustments, and may therefore opt to end their participation in
Medicare.
12 Part A, the Hospital Insurance program, covers hospital services, up to 100 days of post-hospital skilled nursing
facility services, post-institutional home health visits, and hospice services. Part B, the Supplementary Medical
Insurance program, covers a broad range of medical services including physician services, laboratory services, durable
medical equipment, and outpatient hospital services. Part B also covers some home health visits. Part C provides
private plan options, such as managed care, for beneficiaries who are enrolled in both Parts A and B. Part D provides
optional outpatient prescription drug coverage.
13 Medicare has specific rules for fee-for-service payments under Parts A and B as well as capitation (or per person)
payments under Part C. Outpatient prescription drugs covered under Part D are not subject to Medicare payment rules.
Prices are determined through negotiation between prescription drug plans (PDPs), or Medicare Advantage Prescription
Drug (MA-PD) plans, and drug manufacturers. The Secretary of Health and Human Services is statutorily prohibited
from intervening in Part D drug price negotiations.
Congressional Research Service
4
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
unit of output. While CMS implements the payment methods through detailed rule-making,
typically, the basic parameters for setting these payments, including updates over time, have been
established by Congress.
In March of each year, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) makes payment
update recommendations concerning Medicare’s different fee-for-service payment systems to
Congress.14 To do so, MedPAC staff first examines the adequacy of the Medicare payments for
efficient providers in the current year and then assesses how provider costs are likely to change in
the upcoming year, including scheduled policy changes that will affect Medicare’s payment
rates.15 As stated by MedPAC, Medicare’s payment systems should encourage efficiency, and
Medicare providers can achieve efficiency gains similar to the economy at large. This policy
target links Medicare’s expectations for efficiency improvements to the productivity gains
achieved by firms and workers who pay taxes that fund Medicare. The amount, if any, of
MedPAC’s update recommendations will depend on its overall assessment of the circumstances
of a given set of providers in any year. To differing extents, MedPAC’s analyses and
recommendations have shaped provisions in PPACA and the Reconciliation Act; that influence is
noted in this report wherever applicable.
Hospitals and Other Part A Providers
Part A provides coverage for inpatient hospital services, post-hospital skilled nursing facility
(SNF) services, post-hospital home health services, and hospice care, subject to certain conditions
and limitations. Approximately 20% of beneficiaries enrolled in Part A use these services during
any year. CBO estimates that about $223 billion was spent on Part A benefits in 2008, an amount
that is projected to increase to $435.2 billion in 2019. In part because of its sheer size, provisions
reducing Part A spending comprise a significant proportion of the savings attributed to this
legislation either through constraining payment updates or by other payment changes.
Acute Care Hospitals
Generally, the provisions of PPACA and the Reconciliation Act affecting Medicare’s payments to
acute care hospitals will constrain payment increases to these hospitals, restructure payments to
address treatment inefficiencies, and then reshape Medicare’s disproportionate share hospital
(DSH) hospital subsidies. Also, the exception that permits physicians with ownership interests in
a hospital to refer Medicare and Medicaid patients to that hospital will be eliminated for new
physician-owned hospitals or those that did not meet certain criteria.
Specifically, PPACA will adjust Medicare’s annual payment updates to Part A hospitals to
account for economy-wide productivity increases for cost savings (along with certain other
reductions), which is estimated to reduce Medicare spending significantly over 10 years. Under
prior law, the market basket component of the physician update or the Medicare economic index
(MEI) was adjusted to exclude productivity gains. The PPACA provision for adjusting payment
updates for Part A hospitals will use the same measure of productivity improvement, the 10-year
14 Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) Report to Congress: Medicare Payment Policy, March 2009,
http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Mar09_EntireReport.pdf.
15 See pp. 35-41 of Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) Report to Congress: Medicare Payment
Policy, March 2009, for a discussion of their update framework.
Congressional Research Service
5
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
moving average of all-factory productivity, included in the MEI. These estimated savings include
the reduction for outpatient and inpatient services for all hospitals; the savings from extending
this policy to only acute care hospitals were not separately identified.16
Since 1986, an increasing number of acute care hospitals have received additional payments
under Medicare’s inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) because they serve a
disproportionate share of low-income patients. The justification for this subsidy has changed over
time. Originally, the DSH adjustment was intended to compensate hospitals for their higher
Medicare costs associated with the provision of services to a large proportion of low-income
patients. Now, the adjustment is considered as a way to protect access to care for Medicare
beneficiaries. PPACA as amended by the Reconciliation Act will reduce hospitals’ DSH payments
starting in FY2014 equal to 25% of what otherwise would be made, a payment that represents the
empirically justified amount as determined by MedPAC in its March 2007 Report to Congress.17
Acute care hospitals will be paid additional amounts, which will depend on the difference in the
hospital’s DSH payments under PPACA, the difference in the percentage change in the uninsured
under-65 population from 2012, and the percentage of uncompensated care provided by the
hospital (relative to all acute care hospitals). CBO has estimated that this policy will save $22.1
billion from FY2015 to FY2019.
Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs)
Medicare covers nursing home services for beneficiaries who require skilled nursing care and/or
rehabilitation services following a hospitalization of at least three consecutive days. The Balanced
Budget Act of 1997 (BBA 97, P.L. 105-33) required the Secretary to establish a prospective
payment system (PPS) for SNF care to be phased in over three years, beginning in 1998. Under
the PPS, SNFs receive a daily payment that covers all the services provided that day, including
room and board, nursing, therapy, and drugs, as well as an estimate of capital-related costs. Any
profits are retained by the SNF, and any losses must be absorbed by the SNF. The daily base
payment is based on 1995 costs that have been increased for inflation and vary by urban or rural
location. A portion of these daily payments is further adjusted for variations in area wages, using
the hospital wage index, to account for geographic variation in wages. SNF per diem PPS
payments are also adjusted to include a temporary 128% increase for any SNF residents who are
HIV-positive or have AIDS. Section 1888(e) of the Social Security Act requires that the base
payments be adjusted each year by the SNF MB update—that is, the measure of inflation of
goods and services used by SNFs. In its March 2009 Report,18 MedPAC found that Medicare
payments to SNFs overall were adequate and recommended that the market basket update for
2010 be eliminated.
16 The cost estimate issued by the CMS Office of the Actuary for PPACA, mentioned earlier, breaks down the savings
associated with the changes to the update factors to different providers. According to their estimate, the market basket
revisions for acute care hospitals including incorporation of the productivity adjustment in Section 3401 will save
$112.6 billion over 10 years.
17 Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) Report to Congress: Medicare Payment Policy, March 2007,
pp. 70-87, http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Mar07_EntireReport.pdf.
18 MedPAC’s March 2009 Report, Section 2D, pp. 157-182.
Congressional Research Service
6
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
According to the CMS final rule for FY2010, published on August 11, 2009,19 the market basket
update for FY2010 is 2.2 percentage points. In addition, CMS described how it would establish a
revised case-mix classification methodology (Resource Utilization Group–Version Four; RUG-
IV) and implementation schedule for FY2011 (starting October 1, 2010), reflecting updated staff
time measurement data derived from the recently completed Staff Time and Resource Intensity
Verification (STRIVE) project, among other things. According to CMS, these revisions to the
case-mix are intended to correct for changes made for FY2006, in which changes that were
intended to better account for the resources used in the care of medically complex patients
resulted in payments exceeding budget neutrality estimates.
The FY2010 final rule also describes changes to the RUG system for measuring and billing
therapy given to Medicare SNF patients on a concurrent basis. Concurrent therapy is the practice
of a professional therapist working with multiple patients at the same time, each of whom is
receiving different treatments. Prior to FY2010, SNFs were allowed to bill for concurrent therapy
as individual therapy time for each patient. The FY2010 final rule requires SNFs to instead
calculate the therapy minutes allocated to each individual and to report only those minutes on the
MDS 3.0 for billing purposes.
The FY2010 final rule also describes changes to billing for the following high-cost staff-intensive
services: ventilator/respirator, tracheostomy, suctioning, IV medications, and transfusions. Prior
to the implementation of the new law, the RUG billing system took into account the costs of these
services when furnished within the prior 14 days, regardless of whether they were furnished prior
to a patient’s admission. According to CMS, the inclusion of these expenditures in the RUG
billing system was intended to serve as a proxy for the higher-cost medically complex services
delivered to certain categories of SNF residents. More recent analysis by CMS showed this to be
a poor proxy for medical complexity. As a result, the FY2010 rule modifies this look-back period
to include only services delivered after admission to a SNF.
PPACA makes four significant changes to the SNF PPS. First, starting in FY2012, all SNF
market-basket annual updates will be subject to a productivity adjustment. Second, the Secretary
is prohibited from implementing the revised case-mix classification methodology (Resource
Utilization Group–Version Four; RUG-IV) described in the FY2010 final rule prior to October 1,
2011. (New CMS guidance explaining the delay of the RUG-IV implementation, as a result of
PPACA, has not yet been published.)20 Third, the new law required the Secretary to implement
the change specified in the FY2010 final rule to therapy that is furnished on a concurrent basis.
Fourth, PPACA required the Secretary to implement the changes to the look-back period
described in the FY2010 final rule to ensure that only those services furnished after admission to
a SNF are used as factors in determining a SNF case mix classification.
Home Health Agencies (HHAs)
Home health agencies (HHAs) are paid under a prospective payment system (PPS), which covers
skilled nursing, therapy, medical social services, aide visits, medical supplies, and other services.
Durable medical equipment is not included in the home health PPS. The base payment amount for
19 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated
Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2010; Minimum Data Set, Version 3.0 for Skilled Nursing Facilities and
Medicaid Nursing Facilities,” 74 Federal Register 153, August 11, 2009.
20 H.R. 4213, as passed by the House of Representatives on May 28, 2010, would repeal this provision.
Congressional Research Service
7
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
the national standardized 60-day episode rate is increased annually by an update factor that is
determined, in part, by the projected increase in the home health market basket (MB) index. This
index measures the changes in the costs of goods and services purchased by HHAs. HHAs are
currently required to submit to the Secretary health care quality data. An HHA that does not
submit the required quality data will receive an update of the MB minus two percentage points for
that fiscal year.
In its March 2009 Report, MedPAC explained that payments to HHAs have exceeded costs by a
wide margin since the PPS was implemented in 2000. Further, the continuing entry of new HHAs
into Medicare, combined with adequate access to capital, suggested that HHAs were not
generally at risk for becoming insolvent, and were receiving adequate, or more than adequate,
payment. As a result, MedPAC recommended that the MB increase for 2010 be eliminated and
that the payment coding changes scheduled by the Secretary be accelerated. Further, MedPAC
recommended that HHA rates be rebased to better reflect the average costs of care.
The final rule21 for calendar year (CY) 2010 reported that the home health (HH) MB will increase
by 2.0% for that year. In addition, in an effort to address potential fraud and abuse in the use of
HH outlier payments, the final rule also implemented a cap on outlier payments (i.e., payments
for unusually costly 60-day episodes of care) at 10% of total payments per HHA, and no more
than 2.5% of total aggregate PPS payments for all of HH.
In CY2008, CMS made refinements to the home health PPS to try to improve payment
efficiencies. Specifically, the Secretary made changes to the home health agency (HHA) case-mix
index to account for the relative resource utilization of different patients. These changes modified
the coding or classification of different units of service that do not reflect real changes in case-
mix. As a result, the national prospective 60-day episode payment rate was adjusted downward by
2.75% for CY2008, by 2.75% for each year of CY2009 and CY2010, and by 2.71% for CY2011.
The final CMS rule for CY2010 maintained the 2.75% reduction to the HH PPS rates for
CY2010. The final rule also required the submission of OASIS (home health patient assessment
tool) data by HHAs to the Secretary as a condition for payment, and began implementing a new
version of OASIS, OASIS-C January 1, 2010.
Several provisions in PPACA will impact HH payments, some of which reflect MedPAC’s
recommendations. For example, one provision will reduce the HH MB update by 1.0 percentage
point in 2011, 2012, and 2013, and all HH MB annual updates will be subject to a productivity
adjustment starting in 2015. With these changes to the market basket updates, the rate of growth
in payments to HHAs will likely slow and could even fall below zero.
Another provision in PPACA requires the Secretary to rebase home health payments, starting in
CY2014, by a percentage considered appropriate by the Secretary to, among other things, reflect
the number, mix and level of intensity of HH services in an episode, and the average cost of
providing care. Any such adjustments that would result will be required to be made before the
annual payment updates are applied for that year. A four-year phase-in, ending in 2017, will be
provided for, in equal increments that cannot exceed 3.5% of applicable amounts for each year.
21 Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Medicare Program: Home
Health Prospective Payment System Rate Update,” 74 Federal Register 58077, November 10, 2009.
Congressional Research Service
8
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Regarding payments, the Secretary is required to reduce the standard home health resource group
(HHRG) amounts such that the aggregate reduction in payments will equal 5% of total HHA PPS
payments for a period. And, similar to the CMS final rule for CY2010, the total amount of
additional payments for outliers may not exceed 2.5% of the total HHA PPS payments in a given
fiscal year. Also similar to the CMS final rule, starting in CY2011 the Secretary is required to
establish a provider-specific annual cap of 10% of revenues that a HH agency may be reimbursed
in a given year from outlier payments. For visits ending on or after Apri1 1, 2010, and before
January 1, 2016, the Secretary is directed to provide for a 3% add-on payment for HH providers
serving rural areas. CMS notification on March 31, 2010, explains that CMS is currently
developing instructions for the implementation of this rural add-on payment.22
Physicians and Other Part B Providers
PPACA and the Reconciliation Act make several changes to the Medicare program that have the
potential to affect physicians and how they practice in ways both small and large, immediately
and over time. While some of the provisions will have clear and direct consequences, for instance
by altering physician reimbursement right away, others have the potential to influence how
physicians might practice in the future by changing the incentives to encourage improvements in
the organization and delivery of care.
The most immediate and direct modifications include extensions of several existing
demonstration programs and payment policies as well as some modifications to the Medicare fee
schedule. Among the extensions of Medicare initiatives that affect physicians are the gainsharing
demonstration, the extension of the work geographic index floor and revisions to the practice
expense geographic adjustment under the Medicare physician fee schedule, the payment for the
technical component of certain physician pathology services, and the extension of the mental
health add-on to the physician fee schedule. In addition, PPACA modifies the equipment
utilization factor assumption used to determine payment for advanced imaging services, creates a
new demonstration project to pay for certain complex diagnostic laboratory tests, and modifies
the Medicare payment for certain bone density tests.
Additional provisions have impacts for physicians that will be felt in the years to come. PPACA
extends the Medicare Physician Quality and Reporting Initiative (PQRI) incentive payments
through 2014 and implements an incentive (penalty) for providers who do not report quality
measures beginning in 2015, while also providing for an additional bonus to physicians who meet
the requirements of a continuous assessment program (the Maintenance of Certification Program,
MOCP) as well as a subsequent penalty for those who do not meet the standards in the future.
PPACA requires new types of reports and data analysis under the Physician Feedback Program
established under the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA,
P.L. 110-275) including the development of an episode grouper that combines separate but
clinically related items and services into an episode of care payment for an individual, as
appropriate, and the provision of reports to physicians that compare patterns of resource use of
each physician to the patterns of other peer physicians. Information on Medicare physicians will
be reported publicly on a new Physician Compare website to be established by CMS no later than
January 1, 2011, which will eventually include information on physician performance.
22 Letter from Amy Hall, Office of Legislation, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. House and Senate
Notification, March 31, 2010.
Congressional Research Service
9
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
PPACA also gives the Secretary (through CMS) additional flexibility to be able to review and
adjust potentially misvalued codes under the physician fee schedule, establishes floors for some
Medicare payments for providers who practice in states that meet the definition of a “Frontier
State,” and creates a new bonus payment for evaluation and management and certain general
surgery services for five years beginning January 1, 2011, with the intent to expand access to
primary care and general surgery services
The final category of PPACA and the Reconciliation Act provisions affecting physicians has the
potential to change fundamental aspects of how physicians organize, practice, and deliver care in
the future. Some of these provisions create new structures and entities, like the CMS Center for
Medicare and Medicaid Innovation or the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
(PCORI), while others seek to develop alternatives to traditional fee-for-service payment, such as
the National Pilot Program on Payment Bundling, the shared savings program (including the
accountable care organization, or ACO, model), or the value-based payment modifier under the
physician fee schedule. The PCORI, combined with the efforts and experiences with the
alternative payment models, could generate new information about how alternative treatments
affect patient outcomes as well as evidence to support how different payment methods might alter
the incentives for providers and the outcomes for patients. The Innovation Center would then
have the authority and flexibility to adopt new payment alternatives, so long as certain criteria
were met—for instance, maintaining quality while reducing expenditures, or improving quality
without increasing expenditures. In the long run, these provisions combined have the potential to
be the most substantial of the PPACA and the Reconciliation Act modifications affecting
physicians and related providers. All of these changes are described in more detail in Appendix
A.
Payment and Administrative Changes Affecting the
Medicare Advantage Program
Medicare Advantage (MA) is an alternative way for beneficiaries to receive covered benefits.
Under MA, private health plans are paid a per-person amount to provide all Medicare-covered
benefits (except hospice) to beneficiaries who enroll in their plan. Payments to MA plans are
determined by comparing a plan’s cost of providing required Medicare benefits (bid) to the
maximum amount Medicare will pay for those benefits in each area (benchmark). If a plan bid is
below the benchmark, the plan is paid its bid plus a rebate equal to 75% of the difference between
the bid and the benchmark. If a plan bids above the benchmark, the plan is paid the benchmark
and must charge each enrollee a premium equal to the difference between the bid and the
benchmark. Rebates must be used to provide benefits not covered under original Medicare.
Historically, Congress has increased the benchmark amounts through statutorily specified
formulas, in part, to encourage plan participation in all areas of the country. As a result, the
benchmark amounts in some counties are higher than the average cost of original fee-for-service
(FFS) Medicare. Benchmarks currently range from about 100% to over 150% of FFS costs.23
23 See CBO, “Comparison of Projected Enrollment in Medicare Advantage Plans and Subsidies for Extra Benefits Not
Covered by Medicare Under Current Law and Under Reconciliation Legislation Combined with H.R. 3590 as Passed
by Senate, March 19, 2010,” at http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/113xx/doc11355/MAComparisons.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
10
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
PPACA, as modified by the Reconciliation Act, changed how the maximum possible payment to
MA plans is determined, in addition to other payment and administrative changes. Starting in
2012, PPACA phases in benchmarks calculated as a percentage of per capita FFS Medicare
spending. County benchmarks will be set at either 95%, 100%, 107.5%, or 115% of FFS
spending, with a higher percentages applied to counties with the lowest FFS spending. The phase-
in will take place over two to six years. This change in the calculation of MA benchmarks would
lead to reductions in many benchmarks.
However, PPACA increases benchmarks based on plan quality, with higher increases for
(qualifying) quality plans in qualifying areas. Starting in 2012, plans with at least a 4-star rating
on a 5-star quality rating scale will receive an increase in their benchmark. New plans or plans
with low enrollment may also qualify for a benchmark increase. PPACA also varies plan rebates
based on quality, with new rebates set at 50% to 70% of the difference between the plan bid and
the benchmark.
In addition, PPACA requires the Secretary to apply a coding intensity adjustment to plan
payments after 2010. In general, MA plan payments are risk-adjusted to account for the variation
in the cost of providing care. Risk adjustment is designed to compensate plans for the increased
cost of treating older and sicker beneficiaries, and thus discourage plans from preferential
enrollment of healthier individuals. The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-171, DRA)
required the Secretary to adjust for patterns of diagnosis coding differences between MA plans
and providers under parts A and B of Medicare for plan payments in 2008, 2009, and 2010.
PPACA requires the Secretary to conduct further analyses on the differences in coding patterns
and adjust for those differences after 2010. It specifies minimum coding intensity adjustments
starting in 2014.
CBO estimated the provisions changing MA plan payments will save $135.6 billion over the
FY2010-FY2019 period.24 CBO also estimates that the changes will result in reduced MA
enrollment and plan subsidies for extra benefits. Specifically, by 2019, estimated MA enrollment
will be down by 35% (or 4.8 million) from its current 2019 estimate of 13.9 million enrollees
nationwide. Average subsidies of extra benefits not covered under Medicare in 2019 are expected
to decrease to an estimated $67 per month, down from a 2019-estimated amount of $135 per
month. (Current average subsidies of extra benefits are approximately $87 per month).25 The
impact of payment change provisions will likely vary by geography and will depend, in part, on
market competition and plan quality.
PPACA makes additional changes to the Medicare Advantage program that are expected to result
in costs or savings of less than $1.0 billion over the 10-year period (2010-2019), as estimated by
CBO. Each of these provisions is explained in detail in Appendix A.
24 This estimate also includes the repeal of the Comparative Cost Adjustment program explained in detail in Appendix
A.
25 See CBO, “Comparison of Projected Enrollment in Medicare Advantage Plans and Subsidies for Extra Benefits Not
Covered by Medicare Under Current Law and Under Reconciliation Legislation Combined with H.R. 3590 as Passed
by Senate,” March 19, 2010, http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/113xx/doc11355/MAComparisons.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
11
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Changes Affecting Medicare’s Prescription
Drug Benefit
In January 2010, the Medicare prescription drug program began its fifth year of operation. The
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA, P.L. 108-173)
created this voluntary outpatient prescription drug benefit under a new Medicare Part D, effective
January 1, 2006. At that time, Medicare replaced Medicaid as the primary source of drug
coverage for beneficiaries covered under both programs (called dual eligibles). Prescription drug
coverage is provided through private prescription drug plans (PDPs), which offer only
prescription drug coverage, or through Medicare Advantage prescription drug plans (MA-PDs),
which offer prescription drug coverage that is integrated with the health care coverage they
provide to Medicare beneficiaries under Part C. Medicare’s payments to plans are determined
through a competitive bidding process, and enrollee premiums are tied to plan bids. Plans bear
some risk for their enrollees’ drug spending.
Medicare law sets out a defined standard benefit structure under the Part D benefit. In 2010, the
standard benefit includes a $310 deductible and then 25% coinsurance until the enrollee reaches
$2,830 in total covered drug spending. After this initial coverage limit is reached, there is a gap in
coverage in which the enrollee is responsible for the full cost of the drugs (often called the
doughnut hole) until total costs hit the catastrophic threshold, $6,440 in 2010. Individuals with
incomes below 150% of the federal poverty level and with limited assets are eligible for the low-
income subsidy (LIS). The LIS reduces beneficiaries’ out-of-pocket spending by paying for all or
some of the Part D monthly premium and annual deductible, and limits drug copayments to a
nominal amount.
PPACA and the Reconciliation Act make several changes to the Medicare Part D program that
impact beneficiary premiums and out-of-pocket costs. Specifically, PPACA increases Part D
premiums for higher income enrollees; the income thresholds are to be set at the same level and
in the same manner as those used to establish Part B premiums. Also, starting in 2011, consistent
with a voluntary agreement with the pharmaceutical industry, Part D enrollees will be provided
discounts of 50% for brand-name drugs during the coverage gap. In addition, the Reconciliation
Act provides a rebate of $250 to enrollees who enter the coverage gap in 2010 and phases out the
Part D doughnut hole by gradually reducing the cost-sharing during the coverage gap for both
brand-name and generic drugs until it equals 25% of the negotiated price of the drug in 2020
(similar to cost-sharing under the initial coverage limit). The Reconciliation Act also reduces the
rate of growth of the coverage gap from 2014 through 2019. CBO estimates that the closure of the
coverage gap, taking into account the manufacturer brand-name discount, will cost $42.6 billion
over 10 years.
PPACA also contains several provisions designed to improve access to and availability of LIS
plans. For example, the redetermination of LIS eligibility subsequent to the death of a spouse is to
be postponed for a year, and cost-sharing is eliminated for individuals receiving care under a
Medicaid home and community based waiver who would otherwise require care in a medical
institution or a facility. PPACA also makes changes to the methodology used to determine which
plans are eligible to enroll low-income beneficiaries so that more plans could qualify and thus
reduce the number of low-income beneficiaries who need to change plans from year to year.
Additional funding is also provided for outreach and assistance for low-income programs. The
Congressional Research Service
12
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
CBO cost estimate for the changes to the low-income subsidy program in PPACA is $2.4 billion
over 10 years.
PPACA also includes a number of provisions aimed at expanding consumer protections for Part D
enrollees. For example, the Secretary is required to develop and maintain a centralized system to
handle complaints regarding Medicare Advantage and Part D plans or their sponsors. In addition,
Part D plans will be required to use a single, uniform exceptions and appeals process.
Efforts to Improve the Efficiency and Quality of
Health Care Services Provided Under Medicare
By statute, Medicare is prohibited from interfering in the practice of medicine or the manner in
which medical services are provided. As such, Medicare pays for virtually all covered products
and services if they are determined to be medically necessary. However, there is growing
evidence that some services provided to Medicare beneficiaries are not medically indicated or are
unnecessary. In addition, differences in local practice patterns have resulted in substantial
differences in expenditures per beneficiary across geographic areas, but with no measurable
differences in health status.
In June of each year, MedPAC issues a report to Congress that examines systemic issues affecting
the Medicare program and makes recommendations to increase Medicare’s value, to promote its
efficiency, to increase payment accuracy, and/or to realign Medicare’s payment incentives.26 For
instance, MedPAC has concluded that Medicare’s fee-for-service reimbursement system rewards
excessive care and does not encourage service coordination or quality care. Several provisions in
PPACA are consistent with MedPAC recommendations to provide adequate incentives to produce
appropriate, high-quality care at an efficient price. For example, a provision in PPACA requires
the establishment of a national, voluntary pilot program that will bundle payments for physician
and hospital as well as post-acute care services with the goal of improving patient care and
reducing spending. Another provision establishes rewards for accountable care organizations27
that meet quality-of-care targets and reduce costs per patient relative to a spending benchmark
with a share of the savings they achieve for the Medicare program. CBO estimates that this
shared savings program will save Medicare $4.9 billion over FY2010-2019.
In addition, under Medicare’s IPPS, acute care hospitals normally receive a full payment for
patient admissions even if the readmission is preventable and related to the initial admission, the
result of inadequate discharge planning at the treating hospital, or results from inadequate post-
discharge care coordination. PPACA, consistent with MedPAC recommendations, adjusts
payments for hospitals paid under the IPPS based on the dollar value of each hospital’s
percentage of potentially preventable Medicare readmissions for three conditions. The Secretary
of the Department of Health and Human Services has the authority to expand the policy to
include additional conditions in future years. CBO estimates that this provision will save
$7.1 billion over FY2010-2019. Another provision in PPACA will also subject some hospitals to a
26 MedPAC’s Report to Congress: Improving Incentives in the Medicare Program, June 2009, http://www.medpac.gov/
documents/Jun09_EntireReport.pdf.
27 Defined as groups of providers and suppliers who work together to manage and coordinate care for Medicare fee-for-
service beneficiaries and who meet certain criteria specified by the Secretary.
Congressional Research Service
13
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
payment penalty under Medicare for certain high-cost and common health conditions acquired in
the hospital. CBO estimates that this provision will result in savings of $1.4 billion over the next
10 years.
PPACA also requires the creation of a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation within CMS.
The purpose of the center will be to research, develop, test, and expand innovative payment and
delivery arrangements to improve the quality and reduce the cost of care provided to patients.
Successful models could be expanded nationally. CBO estimates that this provision will lead to
an additional savings of $1.3 billion over 10 years.
Changes to Address Medicare Sustainability
Medicare’s financial operations are accounted for through two trust funds, the Hospital Insurance
(HI) trust fund and the Supplementary Medical Insurance (SMI) trust fund, which are maintained
by the Department of the Treasury.28 The primary source of income credited to the HI trust fund,
which finances Medicare Part A, is payroll taxes paid by employees and employers; each pays a
tax of 1.45% on earnings. The trust fund is an accounting mechanism; there is no actual transfer
of money into and out of the fund; rather, income to the trust fund is credited to the fund in the
form of interest-bearing government securities. As long as the trust fund has a balance, the
Treasury Department is authorized to make payments for it from the U.S. Treasury. The 2009
report of the Medicare Board of Trustees, however, projected that the HI trust fund would become
insolvent in 2017.29 If the HI trust fund were to become insolvent, Congress would face a
decision of whether and how to ensure the continued funding of Medicare Part A, as there is
currently no statutory mechanism that allows for general fund transfers to cover HI expenditures
that exceed payroll tax income and trust fund account balances.
Medicare Parts B and D are financed primarily through a combination of monthly premiums paid
by current enrollees and general revenues. Income from these sources is credited to the SMI trust
fund.30 Because the SMI trust fund is funded by annually adjusted premiums and general revenue
transfers, it is kept in balance and does not face depletion. Growth in SMI expenditures will,
however, require significant increases in beneficiary premiums and general revenue over time.
In addition to provisions that reduce annual updates to certain Medicare fee-for-service payment
rates, PPACA contains several other provisions to address Medicare’s financial challenges. For
example, PPACA includes a provision to establish an Independent Payment Advisory Board to
reduce the rate of growth in Medicare spending. Beginning in 2013, if the Chief Actuary of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (OACT) makes a determination that the projected per
capita growth rate under Medicare exceeds certain spending targets in the second year following
the determination, the Board is required to develop a proposal containing recommendations to
reduce that per capita growth rate for submission the following year. The Board will be subject to
28 For additional information on Medicare financing see CRS Report RS20173, Medicare: Financing the Part A
Hospital Insurance Program, by Patricia A. Davis, and CRS Report RS20946, Medicare: History of Part A Trust Fund
Insolvency Projections, by Patricia A. Davis.
29 2009 Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical
Insurance Trust Funds, http://www.cms.hhs.gov/reportstrustfunds/.
30 For beneficiaries enrolled in MA, Part C payments are made on their behalf in appropriate portions from the HI and
SMI trust funds.
Congressional Research Service
14
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
strict fiscal and policy criteria in developing its recommendations, including limitations on the
types of providers it can target between years 2015 through 2019. Recommendations made by the
Board are to be implemented automatically absent congressional action. CBO estimates that this
provision will save $15.5 billion between 2015 and 2019.
PPACA will also impose an additional tax of 0.9% on high-income workers with wages over
$200,000 for single filers and $250,000 for joint filers effective for taxable years after December
31, 2012. The Reconciliation Act imposes a tax on unearned income, starting after December 31,
2012. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that these new taxes will raise approximately
$210 billion between 2013 and 2019. Another provision in PPACA freezes the income thresholds
used to determine which beneficiaries are subject to higher Part B premium rates at 2010 levels
through 2019. Over time, this freeze will result in a larger number of beneficiaries paying the
higher premiums. CBO estimates that this provision will save the Medicare program $25 billion
over 10 years. In addition, as previously noted, PPACA requires high-income Part D prescription
drug program enrollees to pay higher premiums. CBO estimates that this will lead to savings of
close to $11 billion over 10 years.
In an analysis of PPACA, prior to amendment by the Reconciliation Act, CBO estimated that the
legislation would reduce net Part A outlays by $245 billion over FY2010-FY2019.31 As a result of
cost reductions and additional revenues raised through increased payroll taxes, CBO estimated
that the HI trust fund would increase by $385 billion over the 2010-2019 period, and have a
balance of about $170 billion at the end of FY2019. CBO noted, however, that the trust fund
balance would still be declining, and that the HI trust fund would become insolvent a few years
after 2019.32 In a separate analysis,33 the CMS Office of the Actuary estimates that the
combination of lower Part A costs and higher tax revenues in PPACA, as amended by the
Reconciliation Act, will postpone the depletion of HI trust fund assets until 2029.
CBO and the CMS Office of the Actuary both caution against combining trust fund accounting
conventions with budget accounting rules. Reductions in Medicare expenditures can be used to
extend the solvency of the HI trust fund or used to offset costs associated with expansion of
health insurance coverage; using both accounting methods at the same time would result in
double-counting a large share of those savings.
Changes to Address Fraud, Waste, and Abuse
Health care fraud costs the nation billions of dollars annually. Although the actual amount of
money lost to fraud is unknown, the estimates range from as much as 3% of all health care
expenditures to as much as 10%.34 As health care expenditures continue to rise, developing new
31 CBO letter to Sen. Jeff Sessions, January 22, 2010, http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/110xx/doc11005/01-22-
HI_Fund.pdf. This estimate does not include the financial impact of changes made by the Reconciliation Act.
32 CBO Report, “Estimated Effect of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Incorporating the Manager’s
Amendment) on the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund,” December 23, 2009, http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/108xx/
doc10868/12-23-HI_TF_memo.pdf.
33 CMS Office of the Actuary, “Estimated Effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as Amended, on
the Year of Exhaustion for the Part A Trust Fund, Part B premiums, and Part A and B Coinsurance Amounts,” April
22, 2010.
34 The National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA) estimates conservatively that 3% of all health care
spending—or $68 billion—is lost to health care fraud. See “The Problem of Health Care Fraud,” available at
(continued...)
Congressional Research Service
15
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
and innovative approaches to fight fraud in both public and private health insurance programs
become increasingly important.
As the agency responsible for administering CMS conducts a variety of activities designed to
prevent, detect, and investigate health care fraud. These activities are referred to as program
integrity activities. CMS shares responsibility for combating health care fraud with the
Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (OIG), the
Department of Justice (DOJ), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The OIG is an
independent unit within HHS that has the primary responsibility for detecting health care fraud
and abuse in federal health care programs. The FBI conducts complex fraud investigations related
to both private and public health care programs, and the OIG, FBI, and CMS refer suspected cases
of fraud to the DOJ for prosecution.
In general, the anti-fraud provisions contained in PPACA and the Reconciliation Act target CMS’s
program integrity activities, the HHS OIG and DOJ enforcement efforts, and funding for anti-
fraud activities. In the area of program integrity, the legislation provides the Secretary with the
authority to impose certain enhanced oversight and screening measures (i.e., licensure checks,
background checks, and site visits) on providers and suppliers enrolling in Medicare, Medicaid,
and CHIP. To pay for these screening measures, the legislation requires that institutional providers
pay an enrollment fee. Other program integrity measures include requiring Medicare, Medicaid,
and CHIP providers to implement compliance programs, providing the Secretary with enhanced
authority to suspend provider payments, clarifying access to payment and claims data by law
enforcement agencies, and expanding Medicare’s Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program to
Medicaid and Medicare Parts C and D.
In the area of enforcement, the legislation introduces new civil monetary penalties (CMPs) for
certain types of infractions, including falsifying information on provider enrollment applications
and delaying investigations and audits by the OIG. The legislation also enhances the Secretary’s
authority to impose penalties on MA plans for violating the terms of their contract. Practices such
as enrolling individuals into new MA plans or transferring individuals from one plan to another
without consent will be subject to sanctions imposed by the Secretary. Finally, PPACA increases
funding for the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control (HCFAC) program by $10 million annually
for fiscal years 2011 through 2020, and the Reconciliation Act provides an additional
$250 million for the period FY2011 through FY2016.
Concluding Observations
Similar to other purchasers of health care, Medicare spending has been growing much faster than
the general economy, and concerns about Medicare’s long-term sustainability continue to
intensify. Studies by CBO, MedPAC, and others attribute most of the cost growth to the
development and increasing utilization of new treatments and other forms of medical technology.
(...continued)
http://www.nhcaa.org/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?webcode=anti_fraud_resource_centr&wpscode=
TheProblemOfHCFraud. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) estimates that as much as 10% of total health care
expenditures could be lost to public and private sector health care fraud. See “Financial Crimes Report to the Public for
Fiscal Year 2007,” available at http://www.fbi.gov/publications/financial/fcs_report2007/
financial_crime_2007.htm#health.
Congressional Research Service
16
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Although Medicare will have the additional challenge of higher enrollment associated with aging
baby boomers, CBO estimates that most of the expected increase will result from growth in per
capita costs rather than from the aging of the population.35
PPACA and the Reconciliation Act contain provisions designed to reduce Medicare program costs
by approximately $390 billion over the next 10 years through adjustments in payments to certain
types of providers, by equalizing payment rates between Medicare Advantage and fee-for-service
Medicare, and by increasing efficiencies in the way that health services are paid for and delivered.
There are differing views, however, about whether and to what extent Medicare savings should be
used as offsets to fund the expansion of health care coverage, or whether these funds are more
appropriately directed at strengthening the program’s future financial standing. In addition, both
CBO and the CMS Office of the Actuary caution that certain payment reductions may not be
sustainable in the long term, and could possibly result in diminished quality of care and/or reduce
access to needed services.36
35 Congressional Budget Office, “The Long-Term Budget Outlook,” June 2009, pp. 9-10, http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/
102xx/doc10297/06-25-LTBO.pdf.
36 CBO estimate of the effects of PPACA and the Reconciliation Act, March 20, 2010, http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/
113xx/doc11379/Manager'sAmendmenttoReconciliationProposal.pdf, p. 14; and CMS Office of the Actuary,
“Estimated Financial Effects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as Amended,” April 22, 2010.
Congressional Research Service
17
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Appendix A. Selected Medicare Provisions in the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act
of 2010
This appendix provides an overview of the majority of Medicare-related provisions in PPACA
and the Reconciliation Act, including a brief description of the law prior to enactment, a
description of the provision and, where possible, the associated CBO score for each provision.
The provisions are organized by the titles of PPACA (unless otherwise noted, the section numbers
refer to PPACA provisions). Title X provisions of PPACA and Reconciliation Act provisions have
been incorporated within the appropriate titles. The section number and topic of Medicare-related
sections that have been omitted from this appendix are included in footnotes to the immediately
preceding provision.
Title II—Role of Public Programs
Subtitle K—Protections for American Indians and Alaska Natives
Sec. 2902. Elimination of Sunset For Reimbursement for All Medicare Part B Services
Furnished By Certain Indian Hospitals and Clinics. Medicare covers specified Part B services
provided by, or at the direction of, a hospital or ambulatory care clinic (whether provider-based or
free-standing) that is operated by the Indian Health Service (IHS) and Indian tribe (IT) or a tribal
organization (TO). These services include physician services, health practitioners (physician
assistants, nurse anesthetists, certified nurse-midwives, clinical social workers, clinical
psychologists, and registered dietitians or nutrition professionals) and outpatient physical therapy
services provided by physical or occupational therapists. Section 630 of the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA, P.L. 108-173) instituted
a five-year expansion of the items and services covered under Medicare Part B when furnished in,
or at the direction of, IHS, IT, or TO hospitals or ambulatory care clinics, applying to items and
services furnished on or after January 1, 2005. The current five-year reimbursement extension
will expire on January 1, 2010. The provision amends SSA Sec. 1880(e) (1) (A) to extend the
period for which IHS, IT, and TO services are reimbursed by Medicare Part B indefinitely,
beginning January 1, 2010. The CBO score is $0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and is $0.2 billion
for FY2010-FY2019.
Title III—Improving the Quality and Efficiency of Health Care
Subtitle A—Transforming the Health Care Delivery System
Part I—Linking Payment to Quality Outcomes Under the Medicare Program
Sec. 3001 as modified by Sec. 10335. Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. Since
FY2005, acute care hospitals that submit required quality data have received higher payments
than those hospitals that do not submit such information under Medicare’s Reporting Hospital
Congressional Research Service
18
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Quality Data for Annual Payment Update (RHQDAPU) program (often referred to as the hospital
pay-for-reporting program or P4P program). There are 46 quality measures collected in the
RHQDAPU program that impact the FY2011 payment update. Individual hospital performance
on specific quality measures and on certain conditions is available on Hospital Compare available
on the CMS website. In November, 2007, CMS released a mandated report on the implementation
of a Medicare hospital value-based purchasing (VBP) program, which recommends expanding
the RQHDAPU program in order to financially reward hospitals differentially for performance;
public reporting of performance would be a key component as well.
Under PPACA, starting for discharges on October 1, 2012, hospitals will receive value-based
incentive payments from Medicare. The first year of the VBP program will be a data
collection/performance year. Beginning in FY2013, hospital payments will be adjusted based on
performance under the VBP program. Certain hospitals will be excluded in a fiscal year: those
that are subject to payment reductions associated with reporting required quality data in that fiscal
year; those that have been cited for deficiencies that pose immediate jeopardy to their patients;
and those for which there are not sufficient number of measures or cases that apply to the hospital
for a performance period. Acute-care hospitals in Maryland paid under their state specific
Medicare system will be exempt if an annual report documents that a similar state program
achieves at least comparable patient outcomes and cost savings. The Secretary is to select
measures other than measures of readmissions for the hospital VBP program from those used in
the RHQDAPU program. In FY2013, the measures are to cover at least five specified conditions.
For discharges occurring during FY2014 and subsequently, the Secretary is to ensure that
measures would include appropriate efficiency measures, such as adjusted Medicare spending per
beneficiary.
The Secretary is required to establish VBP performance standards, including levels of
achievement and improvement, and a methodology for assessing the total performance of each
hospital. The performance standards are to be announced no later than 60 days prior to the
beginning of the period. Hospitals with the highest scores will receive the largest VBP payments.
There will not be a minimum performance standard in determining the performance score for any
hospital. Hospitals that meet or exceed the established standards for a performance period are to
receive an increased base operating diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment for each discharge in
the fiscal year. Starting in FY2013, the Secretary is to fund the VBP incentive payments by
reducing the base operating DRG payments for each hospital’s discharges in a fiscal year by an
applicable percentage. These reductions will apply to all hospitals. The applicable percentage is
1.0% in FY2013; 1.25% in FY2014; 1.5% in FY2015; 1.75% in FY2016; and 2.0% in FY2017
and in subsequent years. Certain adjustments within Medicare’s inpatient hospital payment
system, such as those for outliers, indirect medical education, disproportionate share hospital and
low volume, will not be affected. Certain payments to sole community hospitals and Medicare
dependent hospitals (for FY2012 and FY2013) will also not be affected.
Individual hospital performance on each specific quality measure, on each condition or
procedure, and on total performance are all to be publicly reported. A process is to be established
that allows hospitals to appeal their performance assessment and score; these appeals are to be
resolved in a timely manner. There will be no judicial or administrative review of certain aspects
of the VBP program. The Secretary is to consult with small rural and urban hospitals on the
application of the VBP program to such hospitals. The RHAQDPU program is also to be
modified. The Secretary will be able to require hospitals to submit data on measures that are not
used for the determination of VBP payments. Effective for FY2013 payments, the Secretary is
Congressional Research Service
19
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
required to provide for appropriate risk adjustment for quality measures for outcomes of care.
These measures are to be validated appropriately.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) is required to conduct a study of the VBP program
with an interim report to Congress due by October 1, 2015 and a final report due by July 1, 2017.
The Secretary is also required to conduct a study of the VBP with a report to Congress due by
January 1, 2016. No later than two years from enactment, three-year, budget neutral VBP
demonstration projects are to be established in critical access hospitals (CAHs) and in hospitals
excluded from VBP because of an insufficient volume; reports on the demonstration projects are
due to Congress no later than 18 months after completion of the projects. The CBO score is
$0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3002 as modified by Sec. 10327. Improvements to the Physician Quality Reporting
System. The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 (TRHCA, P.L. 109-432) required the
establishment of a physician quality reporting system that would include an incentive payment to
eligible professionals who satisfactorily report data on quality measures, based on a percentage of
the allowed Medicare charges for all such covered professional services. CMS named this
program the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI). The Medicare Improvements for
Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA, P.L. 110-275) made this program permanent and
extended the bonuses through 2010; the incentive payment was increased from 1.5% of total
allowable charges under the physician fee schedule in 2007 and 2008 to 2% in 2009 and 2010.
PPACA extends PQRI incentive payments through 2014 and implements an incentive (penalty)
for providers who do not report quality measures beginning in 2015. Eligible professionals who
successfully report in 2010 are to receive a 1% bonus in 2011; those who successfully report in
2011, 2012, and 2013 will receive a 0.5% bonus in 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively.
An additional 0.5% incentive payment will be available in years 2011 through 2014 for eligible
professionals who also meet the requirements of a Maintenance of Certification Program
(MOCP), defined as a continuous assessment program that “advances quality and lifelong
learning and self-assessment of board certified specialty physicians” by focusing on the
competencies of patient care, medical knowledge, practice-based learning, interpersonal and
communication skills and professionalism. MOCPs will require the physician to (1) maintain a
valid, unrestricted medical license in the United States, (2) participate in educational and self-
assessment programs that require an assessment of what was learned, (3) demonstrate, through a
formalized, secure examination, that the physician has the fundamental diagnostic skills, medical
knowledge, and clinical judgment to provide quality care in their respective specialty, and (4)
successfully complete the MOCP practice assessment.
These eligible professionals will be required to participate in and successfully complete a
qualified MOCP practice assessment more frequently than is required to qualify for or maintain
board certification status. The MOCP is to submit information to the Secretary on behalf of the
eligible professional that the professional has successfully met the program criteria and on the
survey of patient experience with care, if requested. The provision authorizes the Secretary to
incorporate participation and successful completion in a MCOP into the composite of measure of
quality of care furnished pursuant to the physician fee schedule payment modifier.
Subsequently, eligible professionals who failed to participate successfully in the program would
face a 1.5% payment penalty in 2015, and a 2% payment penalty in 2016 and in subsequent years.
The incentive payments and adjustments in payment will be based on the allowed charges for all
Congressional Research Service
20
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
covered services furnished by the eligible professional, based on the applicable percentage of the
fee schedule amount. The provision also requires CMS to develop a plan to integrate the PQRI
program with the standards for meaningful use of certified electronic health records as created in
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. CBO estimates that the provision would
cost $600 million over FY2010-FY2014 and $300 million over FY2010-2019; savings will accrue
beginning in 2016 and in subsequent years.
Sec. 3003. Improvements to the Physician Feedback Program. MedPAC, GAO and others
have recently recommended providing information to physicians on their resource use. MedPAC
asserts that physicians would be able to assess their practice styles, evaluate whether they tend to
use more resources than their peers or what evidence-based research (if available) recommends,
and revise practice styles as appropriate. MedPAC notes that in certain instances, the private
sector use of feedback has led to a small downward trend in resource use. The GAO noted that
certain public and private health care purchasers routinely evaluate physicians in their networks
using measures of efficiency and other factors and that the purchasers it studied linked their
evaluation results to a range of incentives to encourage efficiency.
MIPPA established a physician feedback program with the intent to improve efficiency and to
control costs. Under the Physician Feedback Program, the Secretary will use Medicare claims
data to provide confidential reports to physicians that measure the resources involved in
furnishing care to Medicare beneficiaries. The resources to be considered in this program may be
measured on an episode basis, on a per capita basis, or on both an episode and a per capita basis.
The GAO will conduct a study of the Physician Feedback Program, including the implementation
of the Program, and will submit a report to Congress by March 1, 2011, containing the results of
the study, together with recommendations for such legislation and administrative action as the
Comptroller General determines appropriate.
This PPACA provision requires new types of reports and data analysis under the Physician
Feedback Program. Not later than January 1, 2012, the Secretary is to develop an episode grouper
that combines separate but clinically related items and services into an episode of care for an
individual, as appropriate. Beginning with 2012, the Secretary will also be required to provide
reports to physicians that compare patterns of resource use of the individual physician to such
patterns of other physicians.
In preparing these reports, the Secretary is to establish methodologies as appropriate to
(i) attribute episodes of care, in whole or in part, to physicians, (ii) identify appropriate physicians
for purposes of comparison, and (iii) aggregate episodes of care attributed to a physician into a
composite measure per individual. In preparing these reports, the Secretary is required to make
appropriate adjustments, including adjustments (i) to account for differences in socioeconomic
and demographic characteristics, ethnicity, and health status of individuals, and (ii) to eliminate
the effect of geographic adjustments in payment rates. CBO estimates that this provision will have
no effect on spending over the 5-year or 10-year budget window.
Sec. 3004. Quality Reporting for Long-term Care Hospitals, Inpatient Rehabilitation
Hospitals and Hospice Programs. Under current law, inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs),
long term care hospitals (LTCHs) and hospices are not required to report quality data to the
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Medicare pays for inpatient care provided
by IRFs and LTCHs, and for hospices, using different prospective payment systems (PPS). Each
PPS is updated annually using a market basket (MB) index which measures the estimated change
in the price of goods and services purchased by the provider to produce a unit of output. Under
Congressional Research Service
21
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
this provision of PPACA, the Secretary is directed to establish quality reporting programs for
LTCHs, IRFs, and hospices. Starting in rate year (RY) 2014, LTCHs will be required to submit
data on specified quality measures. This requirement will start in FY2014 for IRFs and hospices.
Entities that do not comply will have a reduction in their annual update of 2 percentage points.
The reduction could result in an annual update that is less than 0.0 which would result in a basis
of payment that is lower than in the preceding year. Any reduction is not to affect payments in
subsequent years. The required measures affecting these payments are to be published no later
than October 1, 2012. The providers will be able to review the data prior to being publically
available. The CBO score is $0 for FY2010-FY2014 and -$0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3005. Quality Reporting for PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospitals. Eleven cancer hospitals are
exempt from the Medicare inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) used to pay inpatient
hospital services provided by acute care hospitals. As part of these exemptions, these facilities are
paid on a reasonable cost basis for providing inpatient services, subject to certain payment
limitations and incentives. Currently, there are no quality reporting requirements for these
hospitals. Under this provision, the Secretary is directed to establish quality reporting programs
for IPPS-exempt cancer hospitals starting FY2014. These measures are to be published no later
than October 1, 2012. The providers will be able to review the data prior to being publically
available. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-
FY2019
Sec. 3006 as modified by Sec. 10301. Plans for a Value-Based Purchasing Program for
Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs), Home Health Agencies (HHAs), and Ambulatory Surgical
Centers (ASCs). Under this provision, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) is required to develop three plans (for HHAs, SNFs, and ASCs) to implement
Medicare value-based purchasing programs and submit them to Congress no later than January 1,
2011, for ASCs, and no later than October 1, 2011, for HHAs and SNFs. These plans are required
to consider the following: (1) the ongoing development, selection, and modification process of
measures, to the extent feasible and practicable, of all dimensions of quality and efficiency; (2)
the reporting, collection, and validation of quality data; (3) the structure of value-based payment
adjustments, including the determination of thresholds or improvements in quality that would
substantiate a payment adjustment; (4) methods for the public disclosure of information on
performance; and (5) other issues determined appropriate by the Secretary. In developing this
plan, the Secretary is required to consult with relevant affected parties and consider experience
with such demonstrations that the Secretary determines are relevant to the value-based purchasing
program. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-
FY2019.
Sec. 3007. Value-Based Payment Modifier Under the Physician Fee Schedule. Under this
provision, the Secretary of HHS is required to establish and apply a separate, budget-neutral
payment modifier to the Medicare physician fee schedule. The separate payment modifier is to be
based on the relative quality and cost of the care provided by physicians or physician groups.
Quality of care is to be evaluated on a composite of risk-adjusted measures of quality established
by the Secretary, such as measures that reflect health outcomes. Costs, defined as expenditures
per individual, are to be evaluated based on a composite of appropriate measures of costs
established by the Secretary that eliminate the effect of geographic adjustments in payment rates
and take into account risk factors (such as socioeconomic and demographic characteristics,
ethnicity, and health status of individuals) and other factors determined appropriate by the
Secretary.
Congressional Research Service
22
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
By January 1, 2012, the Secretary is required to publish the specific measures of quality and cost,
the specific dates for implementation of the payment adjustment, and the proposed prospective
performance period. The Secretary is to begin implementing the value-based payment adjustment
in the 2013 rulemaking process. During the performance period, which begins in 2014, the
Secretary is to provide information to physicians about the value of care they provide, as reflected
by the measures of relative quality and cost. The Secretary will be required to apply the payment
modifier for items and services furnished beginning on January 1, 2015, for specific physicians
and groups of physicians the Secretary determines appropriate, and not later than January 1, 2017,
for all physicians and groups of physicians. The Secretary is to apply the payment modifier in a
manner that promotes systems-based care and takes into account the special circumstances of
physicians or groups of physicians in rural areas and other underserved communities. CBO
estimates that this provision will have no effect on spending over the 5-year or 10-year budget
window.
Sec. 3008. Payment Adjustment for Conditions Acquired in Hospitals. Medicare pays acute
care hospitals using the inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS), where each patient is
classified into a Medicare severity adjusted diagnosis-related group (MS-DRG). Generally, except
for outlier cases, a hospital receives a predetermined amount for a given MS-DRG regardless of
the services provided to a patient. In some instances, Medicare patients may be assigned to a
different MS-DRG with a higher payment rate based on secondary diagnoses. Starting October 1,
2008, hospitals did not receive additional Medicare payment for complications that were acquired
during a patient’s hospital stay for certain select conditions. These hospital acquired conditions
(HACs) are: (1) high cost, high volume, or both; (2) identified though a secondary diagnosis that
will result in the assignment to a different, higher paid MS-DRG; and (3) reasonably preventable
through the application of evidence-based guidelines. Under this provision, starting for discharges
during FY2015, acute care hospitals in the top quartile of national, risk-adjusted hospital acquired
condition (HAC) rates for an applicable period in a fiscal year are to receive 99% of their
otherwise applicable payment.37 Acute care hospitals in Maryland paid under their state specific
Medicare system will be exempt if an annual report documents that a similar state program
achieves at least comparable quality outcomes and cost savings. Prior to FY2015, the hospitals
are tol receive confidential reports with respect to their HAC conditions which will be made
publicly available on the Hospital Compare Internet website after the hospital has the opportunity
to review and correct the data. There will be no administrative or judicial review of certain
aspects of the program. The Secretary is required to submit a report to Congress by January 1,
2012, with recommendations with respect to expanding Medicare’s HAC payment policy to other
facilities, including IRFs, LTCHs, hospital outpatient departments, inpatient psychiatric facilities,
cancer hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, ambulatory surgery centers and health clinics. The
CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$1.4 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 10322 Quality Reporting for Psychiatric Hospitals. Under current law, psychiatric
hospitals are not required to report quality data to CMS. Medicare pays for inpatient care
provided by inpatient psychiatric facilities (IPFs) using a unique prospective payment system
(PPS) with annual payment increases based on a market basket (MB) index which measures the
estimated change in the price of goods and services purchased by the provider to produce a unit
of output. Under this provision, the Secretary is directed to establish quality reporting programs
37 In addition, Sec. 3013(b) as modified by Sec. 10303(b) requires the Secretary to the extent practicable, to publicly
report on measures for hospital-acquired conditions that are currently used by CMS for the adjustment of payment to
hospitals based on rates of hospital-acquired infections.
Congressional Research Service
23
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
for IPFs starting in rate year 2014 (July 1, 2013). Entities that do not comply will have a
reduction in their annual update of 2 percentage points. The reduction could result in an annual
update that is less than 0.0 which would lower payments from the preceding year. Any reduction
is not applied to payments in subsequent years. The measures will be endorsed by a consensus
organization under contract to develop quality measures to the extent practicable and feasible;
unendorsed measures may be adopted if endorsed measures have been considered. The required
measures affecting these payments are to be published no later than October 1, 2012. The
providers will be able to review the data prior to being publically available. The quality data will
be published on the Internet website of CMS. CBO did not separately score this provision.
Sec. 10326. Pilot Testing Pay-For-Performance Programs for Certain Medicare Providers.
Under this provision, no later than January 1, 2016, a pilot pay-for-performance program is to be
established for IPFs, LTCHs, IRFs, IPPS-exempt cancer hospitals, and hospice programs.
Medicare requirements and those in Title XI and Title XVIII of the SSA are to be waived as
necessary. Payments under this section for each provider type will be established so that spending
will not be increased. The Secretary will be able to expand the duration and scope of the pilot
project at any point after January 1, 2018, if the Secretary determines that such expansion would
reduce Medicare spending without reducing quality of care or improve the quality of care and
reduce spending. The Chief Actuary of CMS is to certify that an expansion would reduce
Medicare spending. Finally, the Secretary is required to determine that an expansion would not
deny or limit the coverage or provision of Medicare benefits. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 10331. Public Reporting of Performance Information. SSA §1848(m)(5)(G) requires the
Secretary to post on the CMS Internet website a list of eligible professionals who satisfactorily
submitted data on quality measures as part of the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI).
In addition, Sec. 131(d) of the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008
requires the Secretary to develop a plan to transition to a value-based purchasing program for
payment under the Medicare program for covered professional services. Not later than May 1,
2010, the Secretary is required to submit a report to Congress containing the plan and
recommendations for legislative and administrative action.
This section of PPACA requires the Secretary, not later than January 1, 2011, to develop a
Physician Compare Internet website with information on physicians enrolled in the Medicare
program. In addition, the Secretary is required, not later than January 1, 2013, to implement a
plan for making publicly available information on physician performance through Physician
Compare. The section requires the Secretary to, in developing and implementing this plan,
include (1) processes to assure that data made public is statistically valid and reliable; (2)
processes by which providers whose performance is being publicly reported to have an
opportunity to review individual results prior to publication; (3) processes to assure that the
implementation of the plan provide a robust and accurate portrayal of a physician’s performance;
(4) data that reflects the care provided to all patients seen by physicians to the extent such
information would provide a more accurate portrayal of physician performance; (5) processes to
ensure appropriate attribution of care; (6) processes to ensure timely statistical performance
feedback is provided to physicians; and (7) implementation of computer and data systems by
CMS that support valid, reliable and accurate public reporting activities authorized under this
section. The section also requires the Secretary, in developing the plan under this section, to
consider the plan to transition to a value-based purchasing program for physicians and other
practitioners developed under Sec. 131 of MIPPA. The Secretary is required to submit to
Congress a report on the Physician Compare Internet website, including information on the plans
Congressional Research Service
24
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
to collect and publish data on physician quality and efficiency. Finally, the Secretary will be
allowed to establish a demonstration program to provide financial incentives to Medicare
beneficiaries who are furnished services by high quality physicians. The CBO score is $0.0 billion
for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019. 38
Part III—Encouraging Development of New Patient Care Models
Sec. 3021 as modified by Sec. 10306. Establishment of Center for Medicare and Medicaid
Innovation Within CMS. The Social Security Amendments of 1967, as amended by the Social
Security Amendments of 1972, provide the Secretary with broad authority to develop and engage
in experiments and demonstrations to test new approaches to paying providers, delivering health
care services, or providing benefits to beneficiaries participating in federal health care programs.
All demonstrations are required to be budget neutral and be approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) prior to implementation.
Scope. This provision requires the Secretary, no later than January 1, 2011, to establish a Center
for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMI) within CMS. The purpose of the CMI is to test
innovative payment and service delivery models to reduce program expenditures under Medicare,
Medicaid, and CHIP while preserving or enhancing the quality of care furnished to individuals
under such titles. In selecting these models, the Secretary is also required to give preference to
models that improve the coordination, quality, and efficiency of health care services. In carrying
out its functions, the Secretary is required to consult with relevant federal agencies and experts in
medicine and health care management.
Testing (Phase I). The Secretary is required to select models that address a defined population
with poor clinical outcomes or avoidable expenditures. The provision provides the Secretary with
the authority to limit testing to certain geographic areas and select demonstration models that
address a variety of themes, including medical homes, coordinated care, alternative payment
mechanisms, HIT, medication management, patient education, integrated care for dual-eligibles,
care for cancer patients, post-acute care, chronic care management, telehealth, and collaboration
among mixed provider types. The Secretary will not have to require, as a condition for testing,
that the model be budget neutral initially with respect to expenditures. When selecting models,
the Secretary is authorized to consider additional factors such as whether the model includes a
process for managing patient care plans, places the applicable individual at the center of the care
team, utilizes technology, and demonstrates effective linkage with other private and public sector
payers, among other elements.
Evaluation. The Secretary is required to conduct an evaluation of each model tested and make the
evaluations publicly available in a timely fashion. Evaluations are required to include an analysis
of (1) the quality of care furnished under the model, including the measurement of patient-level
outcomes and patient-centeredness criteria as determined by the Secretary, and (2) the changes in
spending. The Secretary may require States and other entities participating in the demonstrations
to collect and report information necessary to evaluate these models.
38 Provisions in Part II of Subtitle A of Title III, National Strategy to Improve Health Care Quality, and related Title X
provisions are discussed in CRS Report R40943, Public Health, Workforce, Quality, and Related Provisions in the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148), coordinated by C. Stephen Redhead and Erin D. Williams.
Congressional Research Service
25
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Termination Authority. The provision requires the Secretary to terminate or modify
demonstrations that do not meet one of three conditions: (1) improve quality without increasing
spending; (2) reduce spending without reducing quality; or (3) improve quality and reduce
spending.
Expansion Authority (Phase II). Taking into account the results of an evaluation, the Secretary
has the authority to expand the duration and scope of a demonstration, including nationwide, if
the Secretary determines that an expansion would: (1) reduce spending without reducing quality
or improve quality without increasing spending; (2) the CMS Office of the Actuary certifies that
an expansion would reduce (or not increase) net program spending under applicable titles; and (3)
not deny or limit coverage.
Waiver Authority. The provision grants the Secretary the authority to waive requirements of Titles
XI, Titles XVIII, and sections 1902(a)(1), 1902(a)(13), and 1902(m)(2)(A)(iii) as necessary to
conduct these demonstrations. The provision also exempts the testing, evaluation, and expansion
of demonstrations from Chapter 35 of title 44, the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), which
requires federal agencies to receive OMB approval for each collection of information request.
Funding. The provision appropriates $5 million for the design, implementation, and evaluation of
models for FY2010; $10 billion for the activities under this section for the years 2011 through
2019; and $10 billion for the activities initiated under this section for each subsequent 10-year
fiscal period beginning with 2020. Amounts are available until expended. The provision requires
that no less than $25 million be allocated to design, implement, and evaluate the specific models
identified in this provision.
Oversight. Beginning in 2012, the Secretary is required to submit to Congress, at least once every
other year, a report on the activities performed by the CMI. Reports are required to include a
description of the demonstrations, the number of participants, the amount of payments made on
behalf of these participants, models chosen for expansion, and evaluation results. Reports are also
required to include recommendations for legislative action to facilitate the development and
expansion of such models nationwide. The CBO score is $0.7 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$1.3 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3022 as modified by Sec. 10307. Medicare Shared Savings Program. In April 2005, CMS
initiated the Physician Group Practice (PGP) demonstration, which offers 10 large practices the
opportunity to earn performance payments for improving the quality and cost-efficiency of health
care delivered to Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries. Accountable care organizations (ACOs)
would go beyond the PGP model, which is based on physician groups, to include additional
providers.
The provision allows groups of providers who voluntarily meet certain statutory criteria,
including quality measurements, to be recognized as ACOs and be eligible to share in the cost-
savings they achieve for the Medicare program. Beginning no later than Jan. 1, 2012, this shared
savings program will enable eligible ACOs to qualify for an annual incentive bonus if they
achieve a threshold savings amount, established by the Secretary, for total per beneficiary
spending under Medicare Parts A and B for those beneficiaries assigned to the ACO. An eligible
ACO is defined as a group of providers and suppliers who have an established mechanism for
joint decision making, and are required to participate in the shared savings program for a
minimum of three years, among other requirements. An ACO includes practitioners (physicians,
regardless of specialty; nurse practitioners; physician assistants; and clinical nurse specialists) in
Congressional Research Service
26
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
group practice arrangements; networks of practices; and partnerships or joint-venture
arrangements between hospitals and practitioners, among others.
In each year of the three-year agreement period, an ACO will be eligible for a shared savings
payment only if the estimated average per capita Medicare expenditures for Parts A and B
services, adjusted for beneficiary characteristics is at least the specified percentage below the
applicable benchmark. This appropriate percentage is to account for the normal variation in
expenditures based on the number of beneficiaries assigned to the ACO. The ACO’s benchmark
for each agreement period is to be based on the most recent available three years of per
beneficiary Part A and B spending for its assigned beneficiaries. This benchmark will be adjusted
for beneficiary characteristics and updated by the projected absolute growth in national per
capital expenditures for Part A and B FFS Medicare services, as estimated by the Secretary. The
benchmark will be reset at the start of each agreement period. Subject to attaining quality
performance standards, an ACO will receive a percentage of the difference between the estimated
average per capita Medicare expenditures in a year, adjusted for beneficiary characteristics, under
the ACO and the ACO’s benchmark. The remainder of the difference will be retained by the
program. The Secretary is to establish limits on the total amount of shared savings that may be
paid to an ACO.
The Secretary may use a partial capitation model or other payment models. Under the partial
capitation model, a qualifying ACO would be at financial risk for some, but not all, of the Part A
and B items and services. The Secretary may limit participation in this model in highly integrated
systems capable of bearing risk. Also, spending under this model cannot result in greater spending
than would otherwise be expended if the model were not implemented.
To earn the incentive payment, the organization is to submit data pertaining to quality and fulfill
certain quality requirements related to clinical processes and outcomes, patient and caregiver
experience of care, and utilization measures. The Secretary has the authority to adjust the savings
thresholds to account for the varying sizes of participating ACOs. If the Secretary determines that
an ACO has taken steps to avoid at-risk patients in order to reduce the likelihood of increasing
costs, the Secretary is authorized to impose an appropriate sanction, including terminating
agreements with participating ACOs. The CBO score is -$0.5 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$4.9 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3023 as modified by Sec. 10308. National Pilot Program on Payment Bundling. As
Medicare beneficiaries with complex health conditions and multiple co-morbidities move
between hospital stays and a range of post-acute care providers, Medicare makes separate
payments to each provider for covered services. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
(MedPAC), among others, has suggested that Medicare test new incentives and payment models
to encourage providers to better coordinate across patients’ episodes of care and to evaluate the
full spectrum of care a patient may receive during these episodes.
Under this provision, no later than January 1, 2013, the Secretary is required to establish, test and
evaluate alternative payment methodologies for Medicare services through a five-year, national,
voluntary pilot program. This program is to be designed to provide incentives for providers to
coordinate patient care across the continuum and to be jointly accountable for an entire episode of
care around a hospitalization. An episode of care is the full period that a patient stays in a hospital
plus the first 30 days following discharge. The Secretary will be able to expand the duration and
scope of the pilot after January 1, 2016, if the Secretary, with certification from the Chief Actuary
Congressional Research Service
27
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
of CMS, determines that such expansion would reduce Medicare spending without reducing
quality of care, among other things.
The Secretary is required to develop provider payment methods that could include bundled
payments and bids from entities for episodes of care. The bundled payment is to comprehensively
cover the costs of applicable services, and other appropriate services, including acute care
inpatient services; physicians’ services delivered in and outside of an acute care hospital setting;
outpatient hospital services including emergency department services; post-acute care services,
including HH services, skilled nursing services, inpatient rehabilitation services; inpatient
hospital services furnished by a LTCH; among others. Participating beneficiaries are to be
entitled, to or enrolled in, Medicare Part A and enrolled for benefits under Medicare Part B.
Beneficiaries cannot be enrolled in Medicare Advantage or a Program for All-Inclusive Care for
the Elderly (PACE). Beneficiaries can have one or more of 10 conditions selected by the
Secretary.
The payment methodology is also to include payment for services, such as care coordination,
medication reconciliation, discharge planning and transitional care services, and other patient-
centered activities, as determined appropriate by the Secretary. Payments for items and services
cannot result in spending more than would otherwise be expended for such entities if the pilot
program were not implemented. No later than three years after implementation, the Secretary is
required to submit to Congress a final evaluation of this program. The CBO score is $0.0 billion
for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3024. Independence at Home Demonstration Program. The Secretary is required to
conduct a Medicare demonstration program, beginning no later than January 1, 2012, to test a
payment incentive and service delivery model that uses physician- and nurse practitioner-directed
home-based primary care teams designed to reduce expenditures and improve health outcomes in
the provision of items and services to certain chronically ill Medicare beneficiaries. The Secretary
is to enter into agreements with qualifying independence at home medical practices, legal entities
comprised of an individual physician or nurse practitioner or group of physicians and nurse
practitioners that provide care as part of a team that includes physicians, nurses, physician
assistants, pharmacists, and other health and social services staff, as appropriate. These practice
staff are to have experience providing home-based primary care services to applicable
beneficiaries. Practice staff are also required to make in-home visits, and be available 24 hours
per day, 7 days per week to implement care plans tailored to the individual beneficiary’s chronic
conditions and designed to reduce expenditures and improve health outcomes in the provision of
items and services to applicable beneficiaries.
The Secretary is required to establish a methodology for sharing savings with independence at
home medical practices that have expenditures below an annual target spending level. The annual
spending target (established by the Secretary) will be the amount the Secretary estimates would
have been spent in the absence of the demonstration, for items and services covered under
Medicare parts A and B provided to applicable beneficiaries. Subject to performance on quality
measures, qualifying practices will be eligible to receive incentive payments if actual annual
expenditures for applicable beneficiaries are less than the estimated spending target. Incentive
payments are to be equal to a portion (as determined by the Secretary) of the amount by which
actual expenditures (including incentive payments) are estimated to be less than 5% less than the
estimated annual spending target.
Congressional Research Service
28
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Agreements with practices under the program cannot cover more than a three-year period. The
Secretary is required to conduct an independent evaluation of the demonstration and submit to
Congress a final report on the demonstration’s best practices and the impact of the pilot program
on coordination of care, expenditures under this provision, access to services, and the quality of
health care services provided to applicable beneficiaries. The Secretary will also be required to
submit a plan, no later than January 1, 2016, for expanding the program if the Secretary
determines that such expansion would result in improving or not reducing the quality of patient
care and reducing spending under this provision. The provision appropriates to the CMS Program
Management Account $5 million for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2015 to administer the
demonstration program. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3025 as modified by Sec. 10309. Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program. Medicare
pays for inpatient care provided by acute care hospitals using an inpatient prospective payment
system (IPPS) where each patient is assigned to a MS-DRG and paid based on an estimate of the
average resources needed to care for a patient with specific diagnoses. Certain atypical cases may
qualify for additional outlier payments. Certain hospitals receive additional indirect medical
education (IME) payments because of their status as a teaching hospital, because they qualify for
disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments or because they treat a small number (or low
volume) of Medicare patients. Certain types of hospitals that qualify as sole community hospitals
(SCHs) or Medicare dependent hospitals (MDHs) receive additional hospital specific payments.
Medicare pays for inpatient services provided by acute care hospitals in Maryland using a state
specific reimbursement system established under a waiver. Medicare pays for inpatient services in
other types of hospitals such as inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), inpatient psychiatric
facilities (IPFs), children’s hospitals, and long-term care hospitals using different reimbursement
systems.
According to Medicare Payment Advisory Commission’s (MedPAC), in 2005, 6.2% of acute care
hospitalizations of Medicare beneficiaries resulted in readmission within 7 days and 17.6% of
hospitalizations resulted in readmission within 30 days. The 17.6% of hospital readmission
accounted for $15 billion in Medicare spending.
Under this provision, starting for discharges on October 1, 2012, the Secretary is to establish a
hospital readmissions reduction program for certain potentially preventable Medicare inpatient
hospital readmissions covering 3 conditions with high volume or high rate (or both). Medicare’s
base operating DRG payment amounts will be reduced by an adjustment factor. Certain
components of Medicare hospital payments will be exempt from these payment reductions,
including outlier, IME, DSH, and low volume payments. Hospital specific payments made to
SCHs and MDHs will be exempt in FY2012 and FY2013 as well. Acute care hospitals in
Maryland will be exempt from these payment adjustments if a comparable state program achieves
the same or higher patient outcomes and cost savings.
The adjustment factor for a hospital in a fiscal year is to be the greater of (1) a floor adjustment
factor equal to a reduced percentage of the discharge payment or (2) a ratio involving excess
readmissions payments for the applicable fiscal year. The floor adjustment factor will be 0.99 of
the discharge payments in FY2013, 0.98 of the discharge in FY2014, 0.97 in FY2015 and in
subsequent fiscal years. The ratio involving excess readmissions payments is to equal 1 minus the
ratio of the aggregate payments for excess readmissions for the hospital divided by the aggregate
payments for all discharges. (Each component of this formula is specified in the provision.)
Congressional Research Service
29
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Excess readmissions includes readmissions over an established minimum number for the specific
applicable condition within a certain period for a hospital.
An applicable condition is defined as a condition or procedure that represents high volume (above
a minimum threshold) or high expenditures for Medicare or meets other specified criteria that
also satisfies certain measures of readmissions (that have been endorsed by a consensus-based
entity with a performance measurement contract under Section 1890 of the Social Security Act).
Readmissions do not include those readmissions that are unrelated to the prior discharge, such as
a planned readmission or a transfer to another hospital. Beginning in FY2015, the number of
applicable conditions are to be expanded beyond the initial 3 conditions to 4 additional conditions
that were identified by MedPAC in its June, 2007, Report to Congress and other appropriate
conditions. These additional conditions do not necessarily need to be endorsed by a consensus
based organization as long as due consideration has been given to such endorsed or adopted
measures.
Readmission information for acute care hospitals is to be made publically available after a
hospital has the opportunity to review and correct the data prior to being made public. No judicial
and administrative review will be permitted for certain aspects of the readmission program.
Readmission data for all patients is to be submitted by acute care hospitals, IRFs, IPFs, children’s
hospitals, and LTCHs and be made publically available after appropriate review. The required
data is to be able to be submitted by a state or other appropriate entity rather than by each
hospital.
No later than two years after enactment, a program to improve readmission rates through the use
of patient safety organizations is to be established for eligible hospitals. Eligible hospitals are
those with historically high rates of risk adjusted readmissions that have not taken appropriate
steps to reduce readmissions and improve patient safety. Eligible hospitals and patient safety
organizations will be required to report on the processes used to improve readmission rates and
resulting impact on such readmissions. The CBO score is -$0.5 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$7.1 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3026. Community-Based Care Transitions Program. The provision establishes a five-year
Community Care Transitions Program under Medicare beginning January 1, 2011. Under this
program, the Secretary is to fund eligible hospitals (with high admission rates, as defined under
section 3025 of this bill) and certain community-based organizations (that provide transition
services across a continuum of care through arrangements with certain hospitals and whose
governing body includes sufficient representation of multiple health care stakeholders) that
furnish improved care transition services to high-risk Medicare beneficiaries. High-risk Medicare
beneficiaries refer to beneficiaries who have attained a minimum hierarchical condition category
score, as determined by the Secretary, based on a diagnosis of multiple chronic conditions or
other risk factors associated with a hospital readmission or substandard transition into post-
hospitalizations. Such diagnoses or risk factors could include cognitive impairment, depression,
or a history of multiple readmissions.
Applications by community-based organizations and hospitals to participate in this program will
be required to propose at least one care transition intervention, other than discharge planning,
such as initiating care transition services for targeted high-risk beneficiaries no later than 24 hours
prior to the hospital discharge; arranging timely post-discharge follow-up to educate patients and,
as appropriate, the primary caregiver, about responding to health symptoms that may indicate
additional health problems or a deteriorating condition; among others. In selecting participating
Congressional Research Service
30
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
entities, the Secretary will be required to prioritize those entities that participate in a program
administered by the Administration on Aging or provide services to medically underserved
populations, small communities, and rural areas.
A total of $500 million is to be transferred by the Secretary from the Federal Hospital Insurance
Trust Fund and the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund for this program. The
Secretary has the authority to continue or expand the scope and duration of the program if it were
determined that quality of care would improve and projected Medicare spending could be
reduced. The CBO score is $0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.5 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3027. Extension of Gainsharing Demonstration. Certain gainsharing demonstrations to
evaluate arrangements between hospitals and physicians have been authorized. CMS is currently
operating two projects, each consisting of one hospital in New York and West Virginia. Although
authorized to begin on January 1, 2007, the project began on October 1, 2008, and was scheduled
to end on December 31, 2009. The Secretary was required to submit mandated reports by certain
due dates. The project was appropriated $6 million in FY2006 to be available for expenditure
through FY2010. Under this provision of PPACA, the authority to conduct the gainsharing
demonstration project in operation as of October 1, 2008 will be extended until September 30,
2011. The due date of the required interim report is extended from December 1, 2008, to March
31, 2011, with the final report due on March 31, 2013. An additional $1.6 million is to be
appropriated in FY2010; all appropriations are available through FY2014 or until expended. The
CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Subtitle B—Improving Medicare for Patients and Providers
Part I—Ensuring Beneficiary Access to Physician Care and Other Services
Sec. 3101. Increase in the Physician Payment Update removed by Sec. 10310.39
Sec. 3102, as modified by Sec. 1108 of the Reconciliation Act. Extension of the Work
Geographic Index Floor and Revisions to the Practice Expense Geographic Adjustment
Under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. The Medicare fee schedule is adjusted
geographically for three factors to reflect differences in the cost of resources needed to produce
physician services: physician work, practice expense, and medical malpractice insurance. The
geographic adjustments are indices—known as Geographic Practice Cost Indices (GPCIs)—that
reflect how each area compares to the national average in a “market basket” of goods. A value of
1.00 represents an average across all areas. A series of bills set a temporary floor value of 1.00 on
the physician work index beginning January 2004; most recently, Section 134 of the MIPPA
extended the application of this floor when calculating Medicare physician reimbursement
through December, 2009. The other geographic indices (for practice expense and medical
malpractice) were not modified by these acts.
This provision provides a short extension of the floor and introduces a new methodology to
determine the practice expense GPCI. First, the provision extends the 1.00 floor for the
geographic index for physician work for an additional year through December 31, 2010. Second,
39 See CRS Report R40907, Medicare Physician Payment Updates and the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) System, by
Jim Hahn.
Congressional Research Service
31
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
the provision directs the Secretary to adjust the practice expense GPCI for 2010 and 2011 to
reflect 1/2 of the difference between the relative costs of employee wages and rents in each of the
different fee schedule areas and the national averages (i.e., a blend of 1/2 local and 1/2 national)
instead of the full difference under current law. Relief applies only to areas with a practice
expense GPCI less than 1.0. The provision holds harmless any areas negatively impacted by the
adjustment.
The provision directs the Secretary to analyze current methods of establishing practice expense
geographic adjustments under the physician fee schedule (PE GPCI) and evaluate data that fairly
and reliably establishes distinctions in the costs of operating a medical practice in the different
Medicare payment localities. Based on the analysis and evaluation, the Secretary is to make
appropriate adjustments to the PE GPCI to ensure accurate geographic adjustments across
payment areas, no later than January 1, 2012. Adjustments made in 2012 are to be made without
regard to the adjustments made in 2010 and 2011. If the Secretary has not completed the required
analysis and evaluation and made appropriate adjustments in the Medicare Physician Fee
Schedule rule for 2012 (or subsequent year), the 2011 payment rule would remain in effect. CBO
estimates that this provision will cost a total of $2.2 billion over the next three years with no
further impact over the remaining years of the 10-year budget window.
Sec. 3103. Extension of Exceptions Process for Medicare Therapy Caps. Current law places
two annual per beneficiary payment limits for all outpatient therapy services provided by non-
hospital providers. For 2009, the annual limit on the allowed amount for outpatient physical
therapy and speech-language pathology combined is $1,840, and there is a separate limit for
occupational therapy of $1,840. The Secretary was required to implement an exceptions process
for 2006, 2007, and the first half of 2008 for cases in which the provision of additional therapy
services was determined to be medically necessary. Section 141 of MIPPA extended the
exceptions process for therapy caps through December 31, 2009. The Temporary Extension Act
of 2010, H.R. 4691 extended the exceptions process through March 31, 2010. This provision of
PPACA extends the exceptions process for therapy caps through December 31, 2010. CBO
estimates that this provision will cost a total of $800 million over the next two years, with no
additional impact over the remaining years of the 10-year budget window.
Sec. 3104. Extension of Payment for Technical Component of Certain Physician Pathology
Services. In 1999, the Health Care Financing Administration, (now the Centers for Medicare and
Medicaid Services or CMS), proposed terminating an exception to a payment rule that had
permitted laboratories to receive direct payment from Medicare when providing technical
pathology services that had been outsourced by certain hospitals. This exception has been
extended through legislation at various times. Most recently, the Medicare Modernization Act of
2003 (MMA, P.L. 108-173) extended the provision until January 1, 2010. This proposal extends
the provision until January 1, 2011. CBO estimates that this provision will cost $100 million in
2010, with negligible or zero costs in future years.
Sec. 3105 as modified by Sec. 10311. Extension of Ambulance Add-ons. Bonus payments were
established for ground ambulance services furnished on or after July 1, 2004, and before January
1, 2010, that originate in a qualified rural area. The qualified rural areas are those with the lowest
population densities that collectively represent a total of 25% of the population. Subsequently, the
Medicare rate for ground ambulance services otherwise established for the year was increased an
additional 3% for rural ambulance services and 2% for other areas for the period July 1, 2008,
through December 31, 2009. Areas designated as rural on December 31, 2006, are treated as rural
for purposes of payments for air ambulance services during this period as well. This provision
Congressional Research Service
32
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
extends the bonus payments and the increased ground ambulance payments until January 1, 2011.
The provision to pay certain urban air ambulance services as rural is extended until January 1,
2011, as well. The CBO score is $0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.1 billion for FY2010-
FY2019.
Sec. 3106 as modified by 10312. Extension of Certain Payment Rules for Long-term Care
Hospital Services and of Moratorium on the Establishment of Certain Hospitals and
Facilities. Long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) are designed to provide extended medical and
rehabilitative care for patients who are clinically complex and have multiple acute or chronic
conditions. LTCHs that are distinct part units of other hospitals are not explicitly permitted by the
Medicare statute. Over time, however, the LTCH industry has evolved to include co-located
hospitals-within-hospitals (HwHs) or satellite facilities in addition to traditional freestanding
facilities. CMS has implemented additional organizational requirements on these LTCHs, in an
attempt to ensure that these are separate entities. Certain LTCHs (grandfathered HwHs) have been
exempted from the requirements. Starting October 1, 2004, CMS established limits on the number
of discharged Medicare patients that an HwHs and satellite LTCHs (except grandfathered LTCHs)
can admit and be paid as independent LTCHs; after that threshold has been reached, generally, the
LTCH will receive a substantially lower payment for subsequent patient admissions who have
been discharged from the host hospital. Starting July 1, 2007, CMS extended this payment policy
to other types of LTCHs, including grandfathered entities. Congress provided for a three-year
moratorium on the application of this payment policy for certain LTCHs starting December 29,
2007.
Effective for the first cost reporting period beginning on or after October 1, 2002, LTCHs are paid
according to a prospective payment system (PPS), subject to a five-year transition period. By
statute, total payments under LTCH-PPS must be equal to the amount that would have been paid
if the PPS had not been implemented in the initial year of implementation. CMS proposed to
review LTCH payments and make a one-time prospective adjustment to the LTCH PPS to correct
for any errors in the original budget neutrality calculations. The same moratorium was applied to
this policy.
The LTCH-PPS includes certain case level adjustments for short stay and interrupted stay cases.
CMS adopted a very short-stay outlier payment policy starting July 1, 2007 to reduce payments
for patients who have lengths of stay that are less than or equal to one standard deviation from the
geometric average length-of-stay of the same MS-DRG under the IPPS. The same moratorium
was applied to this policy. Finally, a three-year moratorium on new LTCHs, including HwHs and
satellite facilities, and on the increase of hospital beds in existing LTCHs was established.
This PPACA provision extends the existing three-year moratoriums for two years until December
29, 2012. The CBO score is $0.2 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.2 billion for FY2010-
FY2019.
Sec. 3107. Extension of Physician Fee Schedule Mental Health Add-On. The Medicare
Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA, P.L. 110-275) increased payments
for certain Medicare mental health services by 5% beginning on July 1, 2008 and ending on
December 31, 2009. This provision extends the add-on payment provision through December 31,
2010. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3108. Permitting Physician Assistants to Order Post-Hospital Extended Care Services.
In a skilled nursing facility (SNF), Medicare law allows physicians, as well as nurse practitioners
Congressional Research Service
33
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
and clinical nurse specialists who do not have a direct or indirect employment relationship with a
SNF, but who are working in collaboration with a physician, to certify the need for post-hospital
extended care services for purposes of Medicare payment. Section 20.2.1 of Chapter 8 of the
Medicare Benefit Policy Manual defines post-hospital extended care services as services provided
as an extension of care for a condition for which the individual received inpatient hospital
services. Extended care services are considered “post-hospital” if they are initiated within 30 days
after discharge from a hospital stay that included at least three consecutive days of medically
necessary inpatient hospital care.
This PPACA provision will allow a physician assistant who does not have a direct or indirect
employment relationship with a SNF, but who is working in collaboration with a physician, to
certify the need for post-hospital extended care services for Medicare payment purposes,
beginning on or after January 1, 2011. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
$0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3109. Exemption of Certain Pharmacies from Accreditation Requirements. MMA
required the Secretary to establish and implement quality standards for suppliers of durable
medical equipment, prosthetics and supplies (DMEPOS) under Part B of Medicare. MIPPA
required DMEPOS suppliers to prove their compliance with the quality standards by being
accredited by October 1, 2009; P.L. 111-72 extended the deadline for pharmacies to obtain
accreditation to before January 1, 2010. In general, MIPPA exempted specified eligible
professionals from having to comply with the accreditation requirements. Pharmacists and
pharmacies are not exempted from the accreditation requirements. PPACA extends to January 1,
2011, the accreditation deadline for all pharmacies not participating in competitive bidding.
Effective January 1, 2011, PPACA exempts certain pharmacies from the accreditation
requirements, although all pharmacies will still be required to meet accreditation requirements to
qualify for competitive bidding. A pharmacy will be exempt from the accreditation requirements
if the pharmacy (1) submits an attestation that its total Medicare DMEPOS billings represent less
than 5% of total pharmacy sales for the previous three-year period, or other period as specified by
the Secretary; (2) submits an attestation that it has been enrolled as a provider of DMEPOS under
Medicare for at least five years with no final adverse determinations against it for the past five
years; and (3) is willing to submit documentation to the Secretary (based on a random sample of
pharmacies) that would allow the Secretary to verify the above information. The documentation is
to consist of an accountant certification or filing of tax returns by the pharmacy. However,
PPACA allows the Secretary to create a more appropriate alternative accreditation requirement
and apply the alternative requirement to all pharmacies. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3110. Part B Special Enrollment Period for Disabled Tricare Beneficiaries. TRICARE,
the health care plan under the Department of Defense (DOD) that covers members of the
uniformed services, their families and survivors, was extended to Medicare-eligible military
retirees, their Medicare-eligible spouses and dependent children and Medicare-eligible
widow/widowers by the Floyd D. Spence National Defense Authorization Act of 2001 (P.L. 106-
398). This law authorized a program known as TRICARE For Life (TFL) which acts as a
secondary payer to Medicare and provides supplemental coverage to TRICARE-eligible
beneficiaries who are entitled to Medicare Part A based on age, disability or end stage renal
disease (ESRD). In order to participate in TFL, these TRICARE-eligible beneficiaries must enroll
in and pay premiums for Medicare Part B. Under Present Law (10 U.S.C. 1086(d)), TRICARE-
eligible beneficiaries who are entitled to Medicare Part A based on age, disability or ESRD, but
decline Part B, lose eligibility for TRICARE benefits. Additionally, individuals who choose not to
Congressional Research Service
34
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
enroll in Medicare Part B upon becoming eligible may elect to do so later during an annual
enrollment period; however, the Medicare Part B late enrollment penalty, would apply. Veterans’
advocacy groups have reported that many beneficiaries are not aware that their TRICARE
coverage is dependent upon Part B enrollment.
This provision creates a twelve-month special enrollment period (SEP) for military retirees, their
spouses (including widows/ widowers) and dependent children, who are otherwise eligible for
TRICARE and entitled to Medicare Part A based on disability or ESRD, but who have declined
Part B. This twelve-month special enrollment period (SEP) will be available to individuals once
in their lifetime and begin on the day after the last day of the initial enrollment period. Individuals
will also have the option of choosing Part B coverage retroactive to the first month after the initial
enrollment period. The late enrollment penalty will not apply to individuals who enroll during the
SEP. The Secretary of Defense is required to identify and notify individuals of their eligibility for
the SEP; the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Commissioner for Social Security
are to support these efforts. This provision is effective on the date of enactment. The CBO score is
$0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3111. Payment for Bone Density Tests. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machines
are used to measure bone mass to identify individuals who may have or be at risk of having
osteoporosis. For those individuals who are eligible, Medicare will pay for a bone density study
once every two years, or more frequently if the procedure is determined to be medically
necessary. As reported by CMS and MedPAC, spending for imaging services reimbursed under
the Medicare physician fee schedule grew rapidly between 2003 and 2005. The Deficit Reduction
Act of 2005 (DRA; P.L. 109-171) capped reimbursement of the technical component for x-ray
and imaging services at the lesser rate of the hospital outpatient rate or the physician fee schedule.
Additionally, CMS implemented a new methodology for determining resource-based practice
expense payments for all services that has led to reductions in the professional component
reimbursement. It is estimated that reimbursement rates for DXA services have been reduced by
more than half since 2006. This provision sets payments for DXA at 70% of the 2006
reimbursement rates for these services in 2010 and 2011. The provision also directs the Secretary
to arrange with the Institute of Medicine of the National Academies to study and report to the
Secretary and Congress on the ramifications of Medicare reimbursement reductions for DXA on
beneficiary access to bone mass measurement benefits. CBO estimates that this provision will
cost $0.1 billion in each of FY2010 and FY2011.
Sec. 3112. Revision to the Medicare Improvement Fund. Section 188 of MIPPA established the
Medicare Improvement Fund (MIF), available to the Secretary to make improvements under the
original fee-for-service program under Parts A and B for Medicare beneficiaries. Under prior law,
$22.3 billion was available for services furnished during FY2014. The provision will eliminate
the funding in the MIF. The CBO score is -$15.6 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and is -$20.7 billion
for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3113. Treatment of Certain Complex Diagnostic Laboratory Tests. Currently, Medicare
reimbursement for diagnostic laboratory tests performed on specimens collected from a hospital
patient is included in the hospital payment (DRG or outpatient PPS). The provision requires the
establishment of a demonstration project under Medicare Part B that will make separate payments
to laboratories for complex diagnostic laboratory tests provided to Medicare beneficiaries.
The term ‘‘complex diagnostic laboratory test’’ means a diagnostic laboratory test that is (1) an
analysis of gene protein expression, topographic genotyping, or a cancer chemotherapy sensitivity
Congressional Research Service
35
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
assay; (2) determined by the Secretary to be a laboratory test for which there is not an alternative
test having equivalent performance characteristics; (3) billed using a Health Care Procedure
Coding System (HCPCS) code other than a not otherwise classified code; (4) approved or cleared
by the Food and Drug Administration or is covered under the Medicare program; and (5)
described in section 1861(s)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(3)). The term
“separate payment” means direct payment to a laboratory (including a hospital-based or
independent laboratory) that performs a complex diagnostic laboratory test on a specimen
collected from a hospital patient if the test is performed after the hospitalization and if a separate
Medicare payment would not otherwise be made.
The demonstration project is to run for a two-year period beginning on July 1, 2011, so long as
the cost of the demonstration program does not exceed $100 million. Not later than two years
after the completion of the demonstration project, the Secretary is required to submit a report to
Congress that includes (1) an assessment of the impact of the demonstration project on access to
care, quality of care, health outcomes, and expenditures or savings to the Medicare program, and
(2) such recommendations as the Secretary would determine to be appropriate. CBO estimates
that this provision will cost a total of $100 million over the next 5 years with no additional impact
over the remaining years of the 10-year budget window.
Sec. 3114. Improved Access for Certified Nurse-Midwife Services. Section 1833 of the SSA
provides for Medicare payments for services received by covered individuals. For certified nurse-
midwife services, the amount required to be paid is 80% of the lesser of either (1) the actual
charge for the services, or (2) the amount determined by a fee schedule established by the
Secretary. The fee schedule is not allowed to exceed 65% of the prevailing charge that would be
allowed for the same services performed by a physician. This provision amends Section 1833 by
adding that for services provided on or after January 1, 2011, the fee schedule for certified-
midwife services will not be allowed to exceed 100% of the fee schedule amount provided under
Section 1848 for the same service performed by a physician. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 10323. Medicare Coverage for Individuals Exposed to Environmental Health Hazards.
To be eligible for Medicare, one must be (1) 65 years or older and eligible to receive Social
Security; or (2) under 65, permanently disabled, and have received Social Security disability
insurance payments for at least two years; or (3) have Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS-Lou
Gehrig’s disease); or (4) have end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This provision will provide
Medicare coverage and medical screening services to certain individuals exposed to
environmental health hazards. An individual with one or more specified lung diseases or types of
cancer who lived for 6 months during a specified period prior to diagnosis in an area subject to a
public health emergency declaration by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as of June
17, 2009, is be deemed entitled to benefits under Part A and eligible to enroll in Part B. The
Secretary is required to establish a pilot program, with appropriate reimbursement methodologies,
to provide comprehensive, coordinated, and cost-effective care to such individuals who enroll in
Part B. Further, the Secretary has the authority to so deem any other individual diagnosed with an
illness caused by an environmental hazard to which an EPA emergency declaration applies who
lived for 6 months in the affected area during a period determined by the Secretary. There is to be
appropriated $23 million for the period FY2010 through FY2014, and $20 million for each 5-
fiscal year period thereafter, to carry out the screening and public information dissemination
program. The CBO score is $0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.3 billion for FY2010-
FY2019.
Congressional Research Service
36
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Sec. 10336. GAO Study and Report on Medicare Beneficiary Access to High-Quality
Dialysis Services The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA,
P.L. 110-275) requires the Secretary to implement a bundled payment system, making a single
payment for Medicare renal dialysis services, to be phased in over four years beginning January
1, 2011. The bundled payment will include (1) items and services included in the composite rate
as of December 31, 2010; (2) erythropoiesis stimulating agents for the treatment of ESRD; (3)
injectable biologicals and medications that were paid for separately under Part B, (before
bundling) and any oral equivalent to such medications; and (4) diagnostic laboratory tests and
other items and services furnished to individuals for the treatment of ESRD. This section of
PPACA requires the Comptroller General to conduct a study and submit a report, within a year of
enactment, on the impact on Medicare beneficiary access to high-quality dialysis services of
including specified oral drugs that are furnished to beneficiaries for the treatment of ESRD and
included in the ESRD bundled prospective payment system. The study is to include an analysis of
(1) the ability of providers of services and renal dialysis facilities to furnish specified oral drugs;
(2) the ability of providers of services and renal dialysis facilities to comply with applicable State
laws, such as State pharmacy licensure requirements in order to furnish such drugs; (3) whether
appropriate quality measures exist to safeguard care for Medicare beneficiaries being furnished
specified oral drugs by providers of services and renal dialysis facilities; and (4) other areas
determined appropriate by the Comptroller General. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-
FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Part II—Rural Protections
Sec. 3121. Extension of Outpatient Hold Harmless Provision. Small rural hospitals (with no
more than 100 beds) that are not sole community hospitals (SCHs) can receive additional
Medicare payments if their outpatient payments under the prospective payment system are less
than under the prior hospital outpatient department (HOPD) reimbursement system. For calendar
year (CY) 2006, these hospitals received 95% of the difference between payments under the
prospective payment system and those that would have been made under the prior reimbursement
system. The hospitals received 90% of the difference in CY2007 and 85% of the difference in
CY2008 and CY2009. Sole community hospitals with not more than 100 beds received 85% of
the payment difference for covered HOPD services furnished on or after January 1, 2009, and
before January 1, 2010. The provision establishes that small rural hospitals are to receive 85% of
the payment difference in CY2010. SCHs with not more than 100 beds will receive 85% of the
payment difference in CY2010. The 100-bed limitation for SCHs is removed so that all SCHs are
receiving 85% of the payment difference in CY2010. The CBO score is $0.2 billion for FY2010-
FY2014 and $0.2 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3122. Extension of Medicare Reasonable Costs Payments for Certain Clinical
Diagnostic Laboratory Tests Furnished to Hospital Patients in Certain Rural Areas.40
Generally, hospitals that provide clinical diagnostic laboratory services under Part B are
reimbursed using a fee schedule. Hospitals with under 50 beds in qualified rural areas (certain
rural areas with low population densities) receive 100% of reasonable cost reimbursement for the
clinical diagnostic laboratories covered under Part B that are provided as outpatient hospital
services. Reasonable cost reimbursement for laboratory services provided by these hospitals
ended July 1, 2008. Under this provision, reasonable cost reimbursement for clinical diagnostic
40 H.R. 4213, as passed by the House of Representatives on May 28, 2010, would repeal this provision.
Congressional Research Service
37
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
laboratory service for qualifying rural hospitals with under 50 beds will be reinstated from July 1,
2010 and extended for one year, ending July 1, 2011. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-
FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3123 as modified by Sec. 10313. Extension of the Rural Community Hospital
Demonstration Program. CMS is conducting a five-year Rural Community Hospital
Demonstration Program to test the feasibility and advisability of reasonable cost reimbursement
for small rural hospitals (those with fewer than 51 beds) in low population density areas. No more
than 15 hospitals can participate in the demonstration. Currently, there are 10 hospitals
participating in the program. This provision extends the demonstration program for an additional
five years, expands the maximum number of participating hospitals to 30 for that period, and
specifies that the 20 states with low population densities will participate in the demonstration
project. The Secretary is to provide for the continued participation for those hospitals that are in
the demonstration at the end of the initial five-year period during the five-year extension unless
the hospital elects to discontinue such participation. Participants will receive the reasonable cost
for discharges occurring in the first cost reporting period beginning on or after the first day of the
five-year extension. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3124. Extension of the Medicare-Dependent Hospital (MDH) Program. Medicare
dependent hospitals (MDHs) are small rural hospitals with a high proportion of patients who are
Medicare beneficiaries. Specifically, the hospitals have at least 60% of acute inpatient days or
discharges attributable to Medicare in FY1987 or in 2 of the 3 most recently audited cost
reporting periods. As specified in regulation, they cannot be a sole community hospital and must
have 100 or fewer beds. MDHs receive special treatment, including higher payments, under
Medicare’s inpatient prospective payment system. The sunset date for the MDH classification has
been periodically extended by legislation and was set to expire September 30, 2011. Under this
provision, the MDH classification is extended one year, until September 30, 2012. The CBO score
is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3125 as modified by 10314. Temporary Improvements to the Medicare Inpatient
Hospital Payment Adjustment for Low-Volume Hospitals. Under Medicare’s inpatient
prospective payment system (IPPS), certain low-volume hospitals receive a payment adjustment
to account for their higher costs per discharge. A low-volume hospital is defined as an acute care
hospital that is located more than 25 road miles from another comparable hospital and that has
less than 800 total discharges during the fiscal year. The Secretary is required to determine an
appropriate percentage increase for these low-volume hospitals based on the empirical
relationship between the standardized cost-per-case for such hospitals and their total discharges to
account for the additional incremental costs (if any) that are associated with such number of
discharges. The low-volume adjustment is limited to no more than 25%. Accordingly, under
regulations, qualifying hospitals (those located more than 25 road miles from another comparable
hospital) with less than 200 total discharges receive a 25% payment increase for every Medicare
discharge.
Under this provision, a temporary adjustment that would increase payment in FY2011 and
FY2012 for certain low-volume hospitals will be created. A low volume hospital could be located
more than 15 road miles from another comparable hospital and have 1,600 discharges of
individuals entitled to or enrolled for Medicare Part A benefits. The Secretary is to determine the
applicable percentage increase using a continuous linear sliding scale ranging from 25% for low-
volume hospitals with 200 or fewer discharges of individuals with Medicare Part A benefits to no
Congressional Research Service
38
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
adjustment for hospitals with greater than 1,600 discharges of individuals with Medicare Part A
benefits. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3126. Improvements to the Demonstration Project on Community Health Integration
Models in Certain Rural Counties. A demonstration project to allow eligible entities to develop
and test new models for the delivery of health care services in eligible counties has been
authorized. Those eligible to participate in the demonstration project are limited to certain entities
in States with at least 65% of its counties in the State with 6 or fewer residents per square mile.
Based on these criteria, the Secretary is instructed to select up to 4 states to participate in the
demonstration program, and within those states, up to 6 counties. For a county to be eligible to
participate, it must have 6 or fewer residents per square mile and contain a critical access hospital
(CAH) that furnished one or more of specified services (home health, hospice, or rural health
clinic) and had a daily inpatient census of 5 or less as of date of enactment; skilled nursing facility
services must be available in the eligible county. The three-year demonstration project is to begin
on October 1, 2009, and be done in a budget neutral manner. This section of PPACA eliminates
the limit of 6 eligible counties that may participate in the demonstration project within the
qualifying states. Rural health clinic services will no longer be one of specified CAH services.
Rural health clinic services are removed from the definition of other essential services and
replaced with physician services. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
$0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3127. MedPAC Study on Adequacy of Medicare Payments for Health Care Providers
Serving in Rural Areas. Under this provision, MedPAC is required to review payment adequacy
for rural health care providers and suppliers serving the Medicare program and provide a report to
Congress by January 1, 2011. MedPAC is to analyze rural payment adjustments, beneficiaries’
access to care in rural communities, adequacy of Medicare payments to rural providers and
suppliers, and quality of care in rural areas, and submit a report to Congress by January 1, 2011.
The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3128. Technical Correction Related to Critical Access Hospital Services. Critical Access
Hospitals (CAHs) are limited-service rural facilities that meet certain distance criteria; offer 24-
hour emergency care; have no more than 25 acute care inpatient beds and have a 96-hour average
length of stay. Generally, a rural hospital designated as a CAH receives 101% reasonable, cost
based reimbursement for inpatient and outpatient care rendered to Medicare beneficiaries. A CAH
may elect an all-inclusive outpatient payment which is equal to a 101% of reasonable costs for
facility services plus 115% of the Medicare physician fee schedule payment for professional
services when the physician or practitioner has reassigned his or her billing rights to the CAH. As
part of its FY2010 rulemaking process, starting October 1, 2009, CMS will lower the facility
component of the all-inclusive, elective payment method from 101% to 100% of the CAH’s
reasonable costs; the payment for professional services will remain at 115% of the fee schedule
amount. Medicare pays for ambulance services provided by a CAH or by an entity owned and
operated by a CAH at 100% of reasonable costs, but only if CAH or the entity is the only supplier
or provider of ambulance services with a 35-mile drive of the CAH or the entity.
Under this provision, Medicare will pay the facility component of the all-inclusive elective CAH
payment for outpatient services at 101% of reasonable costs. Medicare will pay for qualifying
ambulance services provided by a CAH or by an entity owned and operated by a CAH at 101% of
reasonable cost. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-
FY2019.
Congressional Research Service
39
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Sec. 3129. Extension of and Revisions to Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Program. One
component of the Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Program is a grant program (FLEX grants)
that is administered by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). Under this
program, Flex grants may be awarded to States and to small rural hospital for certain purposes.
There are certain limitations imposed on the use of grant funds for administrative expenses, both
at the state and Federal level. The FLEX grant program is authorized at $55 million for each
fiscal year from 2009 and 2010 and the new rural mental health and other services grants would
be authorized at $55 million for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010. Under this provision, the
FLEX grant program will be extended two years until 2012. Starting January 1, 2010, grant
funding will be available to be used to assist small rural hospitals to participate in delivery system
reforms made by this legislation. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
$0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.41
Sec. 10324. Protections for Frontier States. Under this provision, starting for discharges on
October 1, 2010, the area wage index of a hospital located in a frontier state (where 50% of the
counties have less than six people per square mile) will be no less than one. This will not apply to
states where hospitals receive an adjustment to their non-labor related share. This provision will
not be applied on a budget neutral basis. The same provisions will apply to covered HOPD
services furnished after January 1, 2011, in frontier states. A floor of one on the practice expense
index will be established for physician services in these frontier states for physician services on or
after January 1, 2011. The CBO score is $0.8 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $2.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2019.
Part III—Improving Payment Accuracy
Sec. 3131 as modified by Sec. 10315. Payment Adjustments for Home Health Care. Home
health agencies (HHAs) are paid under a prospective payment system (PPS) that provides
payments based on 60-day episodes of care for beneficiaries, subject to several adjustments. The
base payment amount of the PPS is adjusted for differences in the care needs of patients (case
mix) using “HH resource groups” (HHRGs) and outlier adjustments (to account for
extraordinarily costly patients), among other adjustments. Presently, there is no difference
between urban and rural base payment amounts.
In CY2008, refinements to the Medicare HH PPS included, among other changes, a reduction in
the payment rate for four years (to continue through CY2011) to adjust for increases in case mix
that are related to changes in coding instead of increased patient severity of illness. The final
CMS rule for CY2010 continues with the 2.75% reduction to the HH PPS rates for CY2010. This
reduction is consistent with the CMS proposed and final rules for CY2008 explaining that
changes to calculations of case mix would result in a four-year adjustment to payment rates,
including an adjustment downward for 60-day episode of care of 2.75% for CYs 2008, 2009, and
2010, and 2.71% for CY2011. Among other things, the final rule also implements a cap on outlier
payments (i.e., payments for unusually costly 60-day episodes of care) at 10% of total payments
per HHA, and no more than 2.5% of total aggregate PPS payments for all of HH.
41 In a separate score of the potential effects of PPACA on discretionary spending, CBO estimated that this provision
would cost a total of $87 million for years 2011 and 2012 combined. Letter from Douglas W. Elmendorf to the
Honorable Jerry Lewis, May, 11, 2010, http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/114xx/doc11490/LewisLtr_HR3590.pdf.
Congressional Research Service
40
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Under PPACA, starting in CY2014, the Secretary will be required to rebase home health
payments by a percentage considered appropriate by the Secretary to, among other things, reflect
the number, mix and level of intensity of HH services in an episode, and the average cost of
providing care. In doing so, the Secretary may consider the differences between HH agencies in
regards to hospital-based and freestanding providers; for-profit and non-profit providers; and
resource costs between urban and rural providers. Any adjustments that result must be made
before the annual payment updates are applied for that year. A four-year phase-in, ending in 2017,
will be implemented, in equal increments; each increment may not exceed 3.5% of the HH PPS
base payment amount as of the date of enactment.
Regarding payments, the Secretary is required to reduce the standard HHRG amounts such that
the aggregate reduction in payments will equal 5% of total PPS payments for a period. And,
similar to the CMS final rule for CY2010, the total amount of additional payments for outliers
may not exceed 2.5% of the total PPS payments in a given fiscal year (or calendar year). Also
similar to the CMS final rule, starting in CY2011 the Secretary is required to establish a provider-
specific annual cap of 10% of revenues that a HH agency may be reimbursed in a given year from
outlier payments. For visits ending on or after Apri1 1, 2010, and before January 1, 2016, the
Secretary is directed to provide for a 3% add-on payment for HH providers serving rural areas.
The provision also requires MedPAC to conduct a study on the implementation of the HH
payment adjustment under the rebasing, including an analysis of its impact on access to care,
quality outcomes, the number of HH agencies, rural agencies, urban agencies, for-profit agencies,
and nonprofit agencies. MedPAC must submit to Congress a report on this study, together with
recommendations for legislation and administrative action no later than January 1, 2015.
No later than March 1, 2014, the Secretary is required to submit a study (after consulting with
appropriate stakeholders) to Congress on HH agency costs involved with providing ongoing
access to care to low-income Medicare beneficiaries or beneficiaries in medically underserved
areas, and in treating beneficiaries with varying levels of severity of illness. In conducting the
study, the Secretary could analyze methods to potentially revise the home health PPS to account
for costs related to patient severity of illness or improvements in beneficiary access to care.
Examples may include (1) payment adjustments for services involving additional or fewer
resources; (2) changes reflecting resources involved in providing HH services to low-income
Medicare beneficiaries or those residing in medically underserved areas; (3) ways outlier
payments may be revised to reflect costs of treating Medicare beneficiaries with high levels of
severity of illness; and (4) other issues determined appropriate by the Secretary. In conducting the
study, the Secretary could also analyze operational issues involved with potential implementation
of revisions to the home health payment system, including impacts on both home health agencies
and administrative and systems issues for CMS. It could also, among other factors, evaluate
whether additional research is needed.
Taking into account this study’s results, the Secretary may provide for a four-year demonstration,
beginning no later than January 1, 2015, to test whether payment adjustments for HH services
would substantially improve access to care for patients with high severity of illness, or low
income or underserved Medicare beneficiaries. The Secretary may not reduce standard PPS
amounts to offset any increase in payments from the demonstration during that or subsequent
periods. The Secretary will also be required to conduct an evaluation of the project, and submit a
report to Congress, by a date specified by the Secretary.
Congressional Research Service
41
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
The Secretary is to provide for the transfer from the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund and
the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund, in the proportion as the Secretary
determines appropriate, of $500 million for the period of fiscal years 2015 through 2018. Such
funds are to be made available for the study, as well as for the design, implementation, and
evaluation of the demonstration. Amounts are available until expended. The CBO score is -$4.2
billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$39.7 billion for FY2010-FY2019 and includes the effect of Sec.
3401 related to a productivity adjustment.
Sec. 3132. Hospice Reform. For a person to be considered terminally ill for eligibility purposes
for Medicare’s hospice benefit, the beneficiary’s attending physician and the medical director of
the hospice (or physician member of the hospice team) must certify that the individual has a life
expectancy of six months or less. The medical director or physician member of the hospice team
must recertify that the beneficiary is terminally ill at the beginning of each 90- or 60-day
eligibility period. Medicare payments to hospices are predetermined fixed daily amounts for each
case, and are based on one of four prospectively determined units of payment, which correspond
to four different levels of care (i.e., routine home care, continuous home care, inpatient respite
care, and general inpatient care).
Under the provision, Secretary is required to begin, by January 1, 2011, collecting additional data
and information needed to revise payments for hospice care. Not earlier than October 1, 2013, the
Secretary will be required to, by rulemaking, implement budget neutral revisions to the
methodology for determining hospice payments for routine home care and other services that
could include per diem payments to hospices reflecting differences in resources used or additional
payments (end-of-episode payment) reflecting resource intensity of services provided at the end
of episode, among others.
In addition, the provision requires the Secretary to impose new requirements on hospice providers
that participate in Medicare, including requiring, on or after January 1, 2011, that (1) a hospice
physician or advanced practice nurse have a face-to-face encounter with the individual regarding
eligibility and recertification and attest that hospice visits are made; and (2) stays in excess of 180
days, that meet certain conditions, be medically reviewed by CMS or its contractors. The CBO
score is $0.0 for FY2010-FY2014 and -0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3133 as modified by Sec. 10316 of PPACA, and by Sec. 1041 of the Reconciliation Act.
Improvement to Medicare Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) Payments. Medicare’s
disproportionate share hospital (DSH) adjustment was included in the inpatient prospective
payment system (IPPS) in 1986 on the premise that low-income patients are more costly to treat
and those acute care hospitals serving a large number of such patients would be likely to have
higher costs for their Medicare patients than would otherwise similar institutions. Over time, as
the formulas for Medicare’s DSH adjustment have been changed, the justification for the higher
payments has evolved and the adjustment is viewed as a way to insure access to hospital care.
Medicare’s DSH payments are distributed through a hospital-specific percentage increase to its
prospective payment rate. In most instances, the size of a hospital’s DSH adjustment would
depend upon the number of patient days provided to poor Medicare patients or Medicaid patients.
In its March 2007 Report to Congress, MedPAC found that about three-quarters of the Medicare
DSH payments (accounting for about $5.5 billion in FY2004) was not empirically justified in
terms of higher patient care costs. Also, Medicare’s DSH payments were poorly targeted to
hospitals’ shares of uncompensated care
Congressional Research Service
42
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Under this provision, starting in FY2014 and for subsequent fiscal years, the Secretary will make
DSH payments equal to 25% of what otherwise would be made, a payment that represents the
empirically justified amount as determined by MedPAC in its March 2007 Report to Congress. In
addition to this amount, starting in FY2014, the Secretary will pay to such acute care hospitals an
additional amount using a formula that is the product of three factors:
• The difference in the hospital’s DSH payments because of this legislation.
• For FY2014, the difference in the percentage change in the uninsured under-65
population from 2013 (as calculated from current estimates from CBO data
before the vote to enroll the Act in the House) and those who are uninsured in the
most recent period for which data is available minus 0.1 percentage points; in
FY2015 through FY2019, there will be a 0.2 percentage point subtraction; in
FY2018 and subsequently, the calculation will use data from the Census Bureau
or other appropriate sources as certified by the Chief Actuary of CMS.
• The percentage of uncompensated care provided by the hospital (relative to all
acute care hospitals) for a selected period based on appropriate data.
There will be no administrative or judicial review of any estimate used to determine the factors or
any periods used to establish the factors. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$22.1 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3134. Misvalued Codes Under the Physician Fee Schedule. The Medicare physician fee
schedule is based on assigning relative weights to each of the more than 7,000 physician service
codes used to bill Medicare. The relative value for a service compares the relative work involved
in performing one service with the work involved in providing other physicians’ services. The
scale used to compare the value of one service with another is known as a resource-based relative
value scale (RBRVS). CMS is responsible for maintaining and updating the fee schedule,
including the modification and refinement of the methodology for estimating relative value units
(RVUs). CMS relies on advice and recommendations from the American Medical
Association/Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) in its assessments.
In general, as currently implemented, increases in RVUs for a service or number of services
lowers the resultant fees for other physician services because of the budget neutrality condition.
One consequence has been that the payments for evaluation and management codes, whose RVUs
typically are not increased over time, have fallen relative to other codes whose RVUs have
increased and as a consequence of new technologies that have been introduced into coverage with
relatively high RVUs. CMS is required to review the RVUs no less than every five years.
Under this provision, the Secretary is required to periodically identify physician services as being
potentially misvalued, and make appropriate adjustments to the relative values of such services
under the Medicare physician fee schedule. To identify potentially misvalued services, the
Secretary is to examine codes (and families of codes as appropriate) with the fastest growth, that
have experienced substantial changes in practice expenses, for new technologies or services, that
are frequently billed in conjunction with furnishing a single service, with low relative values,
particularly those that are often billed multiple times for a single treatment, that have not been
subject to review since the implementation of the RBRVS (the so-called ‘Harvard-valued codes’),
and other codes the Secretary determined to be appropriate. The Secretary is to review and make
appropriate adjustments to the work relative value units under the fee schedule.
The provision also repeals Section 4505(d) of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, which
established requirements for developing new resource-based practice expense relative value units,
Congressional Research Service
43
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
as well as Section 1868(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ee(a)), which established the
Practicing Physicians Advisory Council, a group of physicians who meet quarterly to discuss
proposed changes in regulations and carrier manual instructions related to physician services.
CBO estimates that this provision will have no impact on spending over the 5-year or 10-year
budget window.
Sec. 3135 as modified by Sec. 1107 of the Reconciliation Act. Modification of Equipment
Utilization Factor for Advanced Imaging Services. Under the Medicare fee schedule, some
services have separate payments for the technical component and the professional component.
For example, imaging procedures generally have two parts: the actual taking of the image (the
technical component), and the interpretation of the image (the professional component). Medicare
pays for each of these components separately when the technical component is furnished by one
provider and the professional component by another. When both components are furnished by one
provider, Medicare makes a single global payment that is equal to the sum of the payment for
each of the components.
CMS’s method for calculating the Medicare fee schedule reimbursement rate for advanced
imaging services assumed that imaging machines are operated 25 hours per week, or 50% of the
time that practices are open for business. Setting the equipment use factor at a lower rate has led
to higher payment for these services. Citing evidence showing that the utilization rate is 90%,
rather than the 50% previously assumed, MedPAC has urged CMS to use the higher utilization
rate in the calculation of fee schedule payments for advanced imaging services and CMS adopted
a 90% use rate assumption in its 2010 final rule for Medicare physician payment. The PPACA
and Reconciliation Act provisions change the utilization rate assumption for calculating the
payment for advanced imaging equipment from 50%, as assumed in prior years, to 75% for 2011
and in subsequent years. This overrides the CMS 2010 final rule that applied a 90% use rate
assumption.
According to MedPAC and the Government Accountability Office (GAO), there are opportunities
to improve the efficiency of the Medicare fee schedule. In 2005, MedPAC recommended
reducing certain fees to account for efficiencies and savings from the technical preparation and
supplies achieved when multiple imaging services are furnished sequentially on contiguous body
parts during the same visit. Starting January 1, 2006, physicians receive the full technical
component fee for the highest paid imaging service in a visit, but technical component fees for
additional imaging services are reduced by 25%. The provision increases the technical component
payment reduction for sequential imaging services on contiguous body parts during the same visit
from 25% to 50%. By January 1, 2013, the CMS Chief Actuary is to conduct and make publicly
available an analysis of whether the cumulative expenditure reductions attributable to these
adjustments are projected to exceed $3 billion for the period 2010 through 2019. The CBO score
is -$0.9 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$2.3 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3136. Revision of Payment for Power-Driven Wheelchairs. Prior to enactment of PPACA,
Medicare pays for new or replacement power-driven wheelchairs either through monthly rental
payments during the beneficiary’s period of medical need (not to exceed 13 continuous months),
or, on a lump-sum basis. Rental payments for wheelchairs are statutorily determined as 10% of
the purchase price of the chair for each of the first 3 months and 7.5% of the purchase price for
each of the remaining 10 months of the rental period. Medicare pays for most DME on the basis
of a fee schedule, except in Competitive Acquisition Areas where payments are to be determined
based on supplier bids. Starting January 1, 2011, PPACA restricts the lump-sum payment option
for new or replacement chairs to only the complex, rehabilitative power wheelchairs. The lump-
Congressional Research Service
44
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
sum payment option is eliminated for all other wheelchairs. The provision does not apply to
competitive acquisition areas prior to January 1, 2011. Also starting January 1, 2011, the rental
payment for power-driven wheelchairs will be 15% of the purchase price for each of the first
three months (instead of 10%), and 6% of the purchase price for each of the remaining 10 months
of the rental period (instead of 7.5%). The CBO score is -$0.6 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$0.8 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3137 as modified by Sec. 10317. Hospital Wage Index Improvement. A hospital wage
index is used to adjust the standardized amount to account for the local wage variation or cost of
labor in the hospital’s area. Starting in FY2005, CMS has adjusted this data to account for the
relative skill mix of the hospitals in the area. This occupationally mix adjusted average hourly
wage is then divided by the same measure calculated using data from all hospitals in the nation to
establish the area’s adjusted wage index. MedPAC issued its mandated report on recommended
changes to the hospital wage index in June 2007. CMS has hired an independent consulting firm
to further evaluate the impact of making the recommended changes.
Unlike other providers, acute care hospitals may apply to the Medicare Geographic Classification
Review Board (MGCRB) for a change in classification from a rural area to an urban area, or
reassignment from one urban area to another urban area. To reclassify, a hospital had to meet
certain standards, establishing that its average hourly wage (AHW) was within a certain threshold
of the AHW of the area where it wanted to reclassify. Starting in FY2010, CMS raised the
reclassification threshold. MGCRB hospital reclassifications are established on a budget neutral
basis so aggregate inpatient payments will not increase as a result of the reclassified hospitals’
higher payments.
Section 508 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
(MMA, P.L. 108-173) provided $900 million for a one-time, three year geographic
reclassification of certain hospitals who were otherwise unable to qualify for administrative
reclassification to areas with higher wage index values. These reclassifications were extended
legislatively at various points until September 30, 2009.
This provision will extend the Section 508 reclassifications until September 30, 2010.42 The
Secretary is required to use the FY2010 wage index data (promulgated in the August 27, 2009,
Federal Register and subsequent corrections). Beginning on April 1, 2010, the average hourly
wage data of these hospitals will be included in the reclassified area only if including the data
results in a higher wage index. Certain hospitals that had a lower wage index from October 1,
2009, through March 31, 2010, than from April 1, 2010, through September 30, 2010, will be
paid an additional amount to reflect such difference by December 31, 2010.
By December 31, 2011, the Secretary is required to provide a plan to Congress on how to
comprehensively reform the Medicare wage index system; this plan is to take into account
MedPAC recommendations included in its June 2007 Report to Congress. The Secretary is also
required to restore the reclassifications thresholds used in determining hospital reclassifications to
the percentages used for FY2009 Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board (MGCRB)
decisions, starting in FY2011 and in subsequent fiscal years (until the first fiscal year beginning
on or after the date that is one year after the date of the submission of the Secretary’s wage index
42 H.R. 4213, as passed by the House of Representatives on May 28, 2010, would extend Section 508 reclassifications
for an additional year, until September 30, 2011.
Congressional Research Service
45
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
reform plan). This provision is to be implemented in a budget neutral fashion. The CBO score is
$0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3138. Treatment of Certain Cancer Hospitals. Eleven cancer hospitals are exempt from
the inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) used to pay inpatient hospital services provided
by acute care hospitals. These hospitals are also held harmless under the outpatient prospective
payment system (OPPS) and will not receive less from Medicare under this payment system than
under the prior outpatient payment system. Under OPPS, Medicare pays for outpatient services
using ambulatory payment classification (APC) groups. This provision requires the Secretary to
conduct a study which would consider the cost of drugs and biologics to determine if the
outpatient costs incurred by IPPS-exempt cancer hospitals with respect to Medicare’s APCs
exceed those costs incurred by other hospitals reimbursed under OPPS. If so, the Secretary would
be required to provide for an appropriate OPPS adjustment starting January 1, 2011. The CBO
score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3139. Payment for Biosimilar Biological Products. A biologic is a preparation, such as a
therapeutic product or a vaccine, which is made from living organisms. Medicare Part B pays for
a limited number of drugs and therapeutic products, including biologics, administered to patients
in physician offices and hospital outpatient departments, or those administered through durable
medical equipment (DME) and billed by pharmacy suppliers. CMS assigns a Healthcare
Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code to each drug, and Medicare payments for
Part B drugs are based on the average sales price (ASP) for each HCPCS code. CMS uses the
same HCPCS code for all drug products listed as therapeutically equivalent in FDA’s Orange
Book. Therefore, a brand-name drug and any generic versions of the same drug would have the
same HCPCS code and the prices would be averaged together for ASP determinations. The
provision allows a Part B biosimilar product approved by the Food and Drug Administration to be
reimbursed at the ASP of the biosimilar plus 6% of the ASP of the reference product. (The term
reference biological product means the licensed biological product that is referred to in the
application for the biosimilar product.) The CBO score (Sections 3139 and Sections 7001-7003
combined) is -$0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$7.1 billion for FY2010-FY2019. 43
Sec. 3140. Medicare Hospice Concurrent Care Demonstration Program. Medicare covers
hospice care for terminally ill beneficiaries instead of most other Medicare services related to the
curative treatment of their illness. The provision requires the Secretary to conduct a three-year
demonstration program, from Medicare funds that would otherwise be paid for hospice care, to
allow patients who are eligible for hospice to also receive all other Medicare covered services
during the same period of time. The Secretary is to select not more than 15 hospice programs in
both urban and rural areas to examine improvement in patient care, quality of life, and cost-
effectiveness that results from the demonstration project. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3141. Application of Budget Neutrality on a National Basis in the Calculation of the
Medicare Hospital Wage Index Floor for Each All-Urban and Rural State. A hospital wage
index is used to adjust the standardized amount to account for the local wage variation or cost of
labor in the hospital’s area. As required by statute, the wage index for any urban area in a state
43 Sections 7001-7003 in Subtitle A of Title VII on biologic price competition and innovation are discussed in CRS
Report R40943, Public Health, Workforce, Quality, and Related Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act (P.L. 111-148), coordinated by C. Stephen Redhead and Erin D. Williams.
Congressional Research Service
46
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
cannot be less than the rural wage index of that state (often referred to as the rural floor). The
effect of the rural floor (that is, raising the wage index for urban areas in a state to that state’s
rural wage index) is required to be implemented on a budget neutral basis by adjusting the wage
index of all hospitals not affected by the rural floor. Until FY2009, CMS funded the budget
neutrality requirement associated with the impact of the rural floor though a nationwide
adjustment. Starting in FY2009, CMS began a transition to fund the budget neutrality
requirement through a state-specific adjustment; the statewide adjustment would be fully
implemented in FY2011. States with no hospitals receiving the rural floor wage index would not
have a reduced payment; those hospitals within each state with urban areas paid at the higher
rural wage index would fund the higher payments for the affected hospitals. The provision
requires the application of budget neutrality requirement associated with the effect of the imputed
rural and rural floor on a national basis (through a uniform, national adjustment to the area wage
index) for discharges starting October 1, 2010. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014
and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3142. HHS Study on Urban Medicare-Dependent Hospitals. Medicare dependent
hospitals (MDHs) are small rural hospitals with a high proportion of patients who are Medicare
beneficiaries. MDHs receive special treatment, including higher payments, under Medicare’s
inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS). Certain other hospitals, such as rural referral
centers (RRC) and sole community hospitals (SCHs) receive special treatment under IPPS. Other
small, limited service critical access hospitals (CAHs) are exempt from IPPS and paid 101% of
their reasonable costs. IPPS includes certain payment adjustments, such as the indirect medical
education (IME) adjustment for teaching hospitals, to compensate hospitals for higher average
costs which might not be in their control. The disproportionate share hospital (DSH) adjustment
increases payments for hospitals that serve a relatively high proportion of poor Medicare and
Medicaid patients. This provision requires the Secretary to conduct a study within 9 months of
enactment on the need for an additional Medicare payments for urban Medicare-dependent
hospitals paid under IPPS which receive no additional IPPS payments (have an IME or DSH
adjustment) or receive special treatment (as an RRC, SCH, or MDH). CAHs are to be excluded as
well. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3143. Protecting Home Health Benefits. This provision requires that nothing in PPACA
may result in a reduction of guaranteed home health benefits under title XVIII of the Social
Security Act. CBO did not score this provision.
Sec. 10325. Revision to Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System.44 SNFs are
paid through a PPS which is composed of a daily ("per-diem”) urban or rural base payment
amount that is then adjusted for case mix and area wages. The base payment is adjusted for
treatment type and care needs of the beneficiary based on 53 payment-adjusted resource
utilization groups (RUGs). In January 2006, CMS implemented a refined SNF PPS (using
FY2001 claims data), including a parity adjustment to ensure that estimated total payments under
the 53-group RUG model would maintain parity to the formerly used 44-group RUG model in a
budget neutral manner.
44 H.R. 4213, as passed by the House of Representatives on May 28, 2010, would repeal this provision.
Congressional Research Service
47
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
According to the CMS final rule for FY2010, published on August 11, 2009,45 the market basket
update for FY2010 is 2.2 percentage points. In addition, CMS described how it would establish a
revised case-mix classification methodology (Resource Utilization Group–Version Four; RUG-
IV) and implementation schedule for FY2011 (starting October 1, 2010), reflecting updated staff
time measurement data derived from the recently completed Staff Time and Resource Intensity
Verification (STRIVE) project, among other things. According to CMS, these revisions to the
case-mix are intended to correct for changes made for FY2006, in which changes that were
intended to better account for the resources used in the care of medically complex patients
resulted in payments exceeding budget neutrality estimates.
Among the changes described in the CMS FY2010 final rule are changes to the billing method for
concurrent therapy. According to CMS, concurrent therapy is defined as the practice of one
professional therapist treating multiple patients at the same time, each of whom can be receiving
different therapy treatments. (There were previously no MDS coding restrictions regarding the
number of patients that may be treated concurrently, among other things.) Prior to FY2010, SNFs
were allowed to bill for concurrent therapy as individual therapy time for each patient. The
FY2010 final rule requires SNFs to instead calculate the therapy minutes allocated to each
individual and to report only those minutes on the MDS 3.0 for billing purposes.
The FY2010 final rule also describes changes to billing for the following high-cost staff-intensive
services: ventilator/respirator, tracheostomy, suctioning, IV medications, and transfusions. Prior
to the implementation of the new law, the RUG billing system accounted for the costs of these
services when furnished within the prior 14 days, regardless of whether they were furnished prior
to a patient’s admission. According to CMS, the inclusion of these expenditures in the RUG
billing system was intended to serve as a proxy for the higher-cost medically complex services
delivered to certain categories of SNF residents. More recent analysis by CMS showed this to be
a poor proxy for medical complexity. As a result, the FY2010 rule modifies this look-back period
to include only services delivered after admission to a SNF.
Under PPACA, the Secretary is prohibited from implementing the revised case-mix classification
methodology (Resource Utilization Group–Version Four; RUG-IV) described in the FY2010 final
rule prior to October 1, 2011. (New CMS guidance explaining the delay of the RUG-IV
implementation, as a result of PPACA, has not yet been published.) In addition, the new law
required the Secretary to implement the change specified in the FY2010 final rule to therapy that
is furnished on a concurrent basis. Further, PPACA required the Secretary to implement the
changes to the look-back period described in the FY2010 final rule to ensure that only those
services furnished after admission to a SNF are used as factors in determining a SNF case mix
classification. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-
FY2019.
Sec. 1109 of the Reconciliation Act. Payment for Qualifying Hospitals. Medicare payments to
acute care hospitals in low-cost counties will be increased by a total of $400 million for two years
(FY2011 and FY2012). The qualifying hospitals are located in counties ranked in the lowest
quartile of adjusted Medicare Part A and B benefit spending (adjusted by age, sex, and race). The
additional payments to each qualifying hospital will be in proportion to its Medicare inpatient
45 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, “Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated
Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2010; Minimum Data Set, Version 3.0 for Skilled Nursing Facilities and
Medicaid Nursing Facilities,” 74 Federal Register 153, August 11, 2009.
Congressional Research Service
48
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
hospital payments relative to Medicare inpatient hospital payments for all qualifying hospitals.
The CBO score is $400 million from FY2011 through FY2012.
Subtitle C—Provisions Relating to Part C
Sec. 3201 as modified by Sec. 10318 of PPACA and Sec. 1102 of the Reconciliation Act.
Medicare Advantage Payment. Medicare Advantage (MA) is an alternative way for Medicare
beneficiaries to receive covered benefits. Under MA, private plans are paid a per-person amount
to provide all Medicare-covered benefits (except hospice) to beneficiaries who enroll in their
plan. Payments to MA plans are determined by comparing plan bids to a benchmark. Each bid
represents the plan’s estimated revenue requirement for providing required Medicare services to
an average Medicare beneficiary. The benchmark is the maximum amount Medicare will pay a
plan. If the plan bid is below the benchmark, the plan is paid its bid plus a rebate equal to 75% of
the difference between the bid and the benchmark. If the bid is above the benchmark, the plan is
paid the benchmark and each plan enrollee must pay a premium equal to the difference between
the bid and the benchmark. MA benchmarks are based, in part, on historical Medicare private
plan payment rates. (MA benchmarks for Regional MA plans are based in part on historical MA
plan payments, and in part on Regional MA plan bids.) Benchmark amounts are increased each
year by the growth in Medicare spending (the national MA per capita growth percentage), or in
certain years, the benchmark may be set at the greater of the previous year’s rate increased by the
growth in Medicare or average spending in original Medicare in that area, with adjustments.
Local MA plans choose the counties they wish to serve. Regional plans must serve an entire
region defined by the Secretary, and may choose to serve more than one region. Regions are made
up of states or groups of states. Though all MA organizations were required to have a quality
improvement program by January 1, 2010, payments to MA plans are not contingent on the
quality of care provided to plan enrollees.
Under PPACA:
MA Benchmarks. Under PPACA, the benchmarks in 2011 will be held at the 2010 levels. In
2012, PPACA phases-in blended benchmarks based on a percentage (95%, 100%, 107.5%, or
115%) of a base amount. In 2012, the base amount is to be set at per-capita spending in original
Medicare; after 2012, the base amount is either the previous year’s base amount increased by the
growth in overall Medicare, or per capita spending in original Medicare in that county. The
percentage adjustment to the base amount will be determined by the county’s per capita FFS
spending relative to that of other counties. Counties will be divided into 4 equal groups (or
quartiles). The 25% of counties with the highest per capita spending will have a benchmark based
on 95% of the base amount. The 25% of counties with the next highest per capita spending in
FFS Medicare will have a benchmark based on 100% of the base amount (i.e., 100% of per capita
FFS spending in the county). The 25% of counties with the third highest per capita FFS spending
will have benchmarks set at 107.5% of the base amount. Counties with the lowest per capita
spending in FFS Medicare will have a benchmark based on the 115% of that amount. The phase-
in schedule for the new benchmarks varies over two, four, or six years depending on the size of
the benchmark reduction, with a longer phase-in schedule for areas where the benchmark
decreases by larger amounts. The Secretary will periodically re-rank the counties. If a county’s
quartile ranking changes, the county will receive a one-year phase-in to the new ranking level.
The benchmarks as calculated under the new methodology cannot be greater than what they
Congressional Research Service
49
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
would have been in the absence of PPACA. The new blended benchmarks does not apply to the
Program for All Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE plans).46
Quality Increases to Benchmarks. PPACA increases benchmarks based on plan quality, with
higher increases for quality plans in qualifying areas. Starting in 2012, plans with at least a 4-star
rating on a 5-star quality rating scale will receive an increase in their benchmark. In 2012,
qualifying plans receive a 1.5 percentage point increase in their benchmark; in 2013, the increase
is 3.0 percentage points, and starting in 2014, the increase is 5.0 percentage points. The increases
are doubled for qualifying plans in a qualifying county. A qualifying county is defined as a county
with (1) lower than average per capita spending in original Medicare, (2) 25% or more
beneficiaries enrolled in MA, as of December 2009, and (3) a payment rate in 2004 based on the
minimum amount applicable to a metropolitan statistical area (i.e., an urban floor rate). New
plans or plans with low enrollment, as determined by the Secretary, may also qualify for a
benchmark increase. Plans with low enrollment will be deemed to qualify for a quality increase in
2012.47 Starting in 2013, the Secretary is required to establish a method of determining plan
quality for plans with low enrollment. New plans will be deemed to meet the quality
requirements, but the percentage increase in their benchmarks will be lower in 2013 and 2014.
Rebates. An MA plan receives a rebate if its bid is below the benchmark. The rebate is equal to a
percentage of the difference between the bid and the benchmark. Prior to PPACA, all such plans
received a 75% rebate to be used to provide additional benefits not covered under Medicare,
reduced cost-sharing, and/or reduced Part B or D premiums. PPACA varies plan rebates based on
quality. The highest quality plans (4.5 stars or higher) will receive a 70% rebate if their bid is
below the benchmark. Plans with at least 3.5 stars and less than 4.5 stars receive a 65% rebate.
Plans with less than 3.5 stars receive a 50% rebate if their bid is below the benchmark. In 2012,
plans with low enrollment will be treated as having a 4.5 star rating (with a 70% rebate). Starting
in 2012, new plans will be treated as having 3.5 stars. New plans are defined as those that are
offered by organizations that have not had a contract as an MA organization in the preceding three
years. The change in rebate percentages will be phased in over three years.
Application of Coding Intensity Adjustment. In general, MA plan payments are risk-adjusted to
account for the variation in the cost of providing care. Risk adjustment is designed to compensate
plans for the increased cost of treating older and sicker beneficiaries, and thus discourage plans
from preferential enrollment of healthier individuals. The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (P.L.
109-171, DRA) required the Secretary to adjust for patterns of diagnosis coding differences
between MA plans and providers under parts A and B of Medicare for plan payments in 2008,
2009, and 2010. PPACA requires the Secretary to conduct further analyses on the differences in
coding patterns and adjust for those differences after 2010. Starting in 2014, PPACA specifies
minimum coding intensity adjustments. In 2014, the adjustment will be at least the value of the
adjustment in 2010 plus 1.3 percentage points; for 2015 to 2018, the adjustment will be not less
than the adjustment for the previous year increased by 0.25 percentage points; starting in 2019,
the coding intensity adjustment will not be less than 5.7%.
46 Under the PACE program, Medicare contracts with organizations to provide comprehensive medical and social
services to the frail elderly who enroll in the program. PACE plans, like MA plans, are paid on a capitated basis.
47 MA plans with low enrollment may not have enough enrollees to either generate the quality data, or give an accurate
assessment of plan quality.
Congressional Research Service
50
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Repeal of Comparative Cost Adjustment Program. Comparative Cost Adjustment is a program
required by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (P.L.
108-132) to: (1) examine a new MA payment system under which payments to MA plans would
be based on a weighted average of plan bids; and (2) introduce possible adjustments (either
increases or decreases) to FFS Medicare Part B premiums, based on a comparison of the costs of
providing required Medicare benefits to the cost of providing the same benefits in the MA
program. PPACA repeals this program. The CBO score (combined with Section 3209 and Section
1103 of HCERA) is -$30.3 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$135.6 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Section 1103 of the Reconciliation Act. Savings from Limits on MA Plan Administrative
Costs. A Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) identifies the proportion of a plan’s premium revenue that
the plan devotes to the provision of health care services. The remaining proportion represents the
amount spent on managing the plan, including administrative costs, advertising, and profits.
Beginning in 2014, PPACA requires plans to have an MLR of less than .85 or remit to the
Secretary a payment equal to their total revenue multiplied by the difference between .85 and
their MLR. The Secretary is required to restrict enrollment in an MA plan if its MLR was below
.85 for three consecutive years and terminate the plan’s contract if the plan fails to meet the MLR
requirements for five consecutive years. The CBO score for this section was included in the
estimate for Section 3201.
Sec. 3202. Benefit Protection and Simplification. Under MA, enrollee cost sharing (i.e.,
coinsurance, copayments, and deductibles) is determined on a plan-by-plan basis. Cost sharing
for a particular service may be greater than or less than the cost sharing under original Medicare,
and may change from year to year. However, the total value of cost sharing required by an MA
plan is constrained by the estimated actuarial value of total cost sharing under original Medicare.
Under PPACA, beginning in 2011, MA plans will be prohibited from charging cost sharing that is
greater than the cost sharing under original Medicare for certain services including chemotherapy
treatment, renal dialysis, skilled nursing care, and services identified by the Secretary.48 The CBO
score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3203. Application of Coding Intensity Adjustment During MA Payment Transition. This
provision was repealed by the Reconciliation Act. A coding intensity adjustment provision was
added to Section 3201 and is discussed above.
Sec. 3204. Simplification of Annual Beneficiary Election Periods. Medicare beneficiaries may
enroll in or change their enrollment in MA from November 15 to December 31 each year (the
annual, coordinated election period). Changes go into effect January 1st of the next year. During
the first 3 months of the year, beneficiaries can enroll in an MA plan, and individuals enrolled in
an MA plan can either switch to a different MA plan or return to original Medicare (the
continuous open enrollment and disenrollment period). Effective beginning in 2011, PPACA
shifts the annual, coordinated election period for MA and Part D to October 15 through
December 7. Also beginning in 2011, this provision prohibits beneficiaries from switching MA
plans or enrolling in an MA plan from original Medicare after the start of the benefit year.
PPACA, however, allows beneficiaries who had enrolled in Medicare Advantage during the
annual, coordinated election period to disenroll and return to original Medicare during the first
48 Provisions in PPACA that would have (1) required plans to apportion their rebates and bonus payments according to
a priority order, and (2) prohibited plans from reducing or eliminating the Part B premium as an additional plan benefit,
were overridden by provisions in the reconciliation bill, and thus are not part of the reform law.
Congressional Research Service
51
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
45-day period of the new benefit year (January 1-February 15), and allows those beneficiaries to
enroll in a Part D prescription drug plan. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
$0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3205. Extension for Specialized MA Plans for Special Needs Individuals. The Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA, P.L. 108-173)
established a new type of Medicare Advantage (MA) coordinated care plan focused on
individuals with special needs. Special needs plans (SNPs) are allowed to target enrollment to one
or more types of special needs individuals including 1) institutionalized; 2) dually eligible; and/or
3) individuals with severe or disabling chronic conditions. This provision extends SNP authority
through December 31, 2013. The Secretary is required to establish a frailty payment adjustment,
similar to PACE, for fully integrated dual-eligible SNPs. The Secretary only has authority to
adjust payments to dual-eligible SNP when those plans have fully integrated Medicare and
Medicaid benefits, including long-term care, and met other criteria. Fully integrated dual-eligible
SNPs will be exempted from the IME payment phase-out applicable to all MA plans.
In addition, the provision temporarily extends authority through the end of 2012 for SNPs that do
not have contracts with state Medicaid programs to continue to operate, but not to expand their
service area. The provision requires the Secretary to establish a process to transition SNP
beneficiaries that do not qualify as special needs individuals, to fee-for-service Medicare and
other MA plans. As part of the transition process, the Secretary will provide for an exception
process for beneficiaries who lose Medicaid coverage to reapply for benefits. Beginning in 2012,
SNPs will be required to have approval of the National Committee for Quality Assurance in order
to serve targeted populations. Periodically, beginning in 2011, the Secretary is required to
evaluate, revise, and publish the MA risk adjustment payment methodology to recalibrate
payments for higher medical and care coordination costs for specified conditions. The CBO score
(combined with Section 3208) is $0.6 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.7 billion for FY2010-
FY2019.
Sec. 3206. Extension of Reasonable Cost Contracts. Reasonable cost plans are Medicare
Advantage (MA) plans that are reimbursed by Medicare for the actual cost of providing services
to enrollees. Cost plans were created in the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) of
1982. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 included a provision to phase-out the reasonable cost
contracts, however, the phase-out has been delayed over the years through congressional action.
These plans are allowed to operate indefinitely, unless two other plans of the same type (i.e.,
either 2 local or 2 regional plans) offered by different organizations operate for the entire year in
the cost contract’s service area. Under prior law, after January 1, 2010, the Secretary could not
extend or renew a reasonable cost contract for a service area if (1) during the entire previous year
there were either two or more MA regional plans or two or more MA local plans in the service
area offered by different MA organizations, and (2) these regional or local plans meet minimum
enrollment requirements. PPACA extends for three years—from January 1, 2010, to January 1,
2013—the length of time reasonable cost plans may continue operating regardless of any other
MA plans serving the area. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3207. Technical Correction to MA Private Fee-for-Service Plans. MA coordinated care
plans are required to meet medical access requirements by forming networks of contracted
providers. Prior to 2011, PFFS plans can meet medical access requirements either by establishing
payment rates for providers that are not less than rates paid under original Medicare or by
developing contracts and agreements with a sufficient number and range of providers within a
Congressional Research Service
52
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
category to provide covered services under the terms of the plan. Starting in 2011, PFFS plans
sponsored by employers or unions are required to establish contracted networks of providers to
meet access requirements. Non-employer sponsored MA PFFS plans are required to establish
contracted networks of providers in “network areas” defined as areas having at least two plans
with networks (such as health maintenance organizations [HMOs], provider sponsored
organizations [PSOs], or local preferred provider organizations [PPOs]). In areas without at least
two network-based plans, the non-employer PFFS plans retain the ability to establish access
requirements through establishing payment rates that are not less than those under original
Medicare.
PPACA allows the Secretary to grant employer-based PFFS plans with enrollment as of October
1, 2009, a waiver from the network requirements in a manner similar to the Secretary’s authority
to waive or modify other MA requirements for employer-based coordinated care plans as
specified in a 2008 service area extension waiver policy, as modified in an April 11, 2008 CMS
memo entitled “2009 Employer Group Waiver-Modification of the 2008 Service Area Extension
Waiver Granted to Certain MA Local Coordinated Care Plans.” The CBO score is $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2014 and $0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3208. Making Senior Housing Facility Demonstration Permanent. In general, MA plans
are required to serve an area no smaller than a county, which prevents plans from targeting
smaller areas of healthier, low-cost enrollees. However, it is possible for an MA plan to receive a
waiver of this requirement to be able to restrict enrollment to residents of a retirement
community. Effective January 1, 2010, PPACA requires the Secretary to establish a new type of
MA plan called an MA Senior Housing Facility Plan, which is to be allowed to limit its service
area to a senior housing facility within a geographic area. An MA Senior Housing Facility Plan is
to be an MA plan that serves beneficiaries who reside in a continuing care retirement community,
has a sufficient number of on-site primary care providers as determined by the Secretary, supplies
transportation benefits to other providers, and were in existence under a demonstration for at least
one year. The CBO score for this section was included in the estimate for Section 3205.
Sec. 3209. Authority to Deny Plan Bids. In general, the Secretary has the authority to negotiate
bids submitted by MA plans similar to the authority of the Director of the Office of Personnel
Management with respect to negotiations with plans participating in the Federal Employees
Health Benefits Program. The Secretary may only accept a bid after determining that it is
supported actuarially and that it reasonably and equitably reflects the revenue requirements of
benefits provided under the plan. The Secretary’s authority to negotiate with plans does not apply
to Private Fee-for-Service (PFFS) MA plans. Effective January 1, 2011, PPACA clarifies that the
Secretary is not required to accept any or every bid submitted by an MA plan or Part D
prescription drug plan. The CBO score for this section was included in the estimate for Section
3201.
Sec. 3210. Development of New Standards for Certain Medigap Plans. Many Medicare
beneficiaries have individually purchased health insurance policies, commonly referred to as
“Medigap” policies. Beneficiaries with Medigap insurance typically have coverage for
Medicare’s deductibles and coinsurance; they may also have coverage for some items and
services not covered by Medicare. Individuals generally select from one of a set of standardized
plans (Plan “A” through Plan “L”, though not all plans are offered in all states). The law
incorporates by reference, as part of the statutory requirements, certain minimum standards
established by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and provides for
modification where appropriate to reflect program changes. PPACA requests that NAIC create
Congressional Research Service
53
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
new model plans for C and F that include nominal cost sharing to encourage the use of
appropriate Part B physician services. The nominal cost sharing is to be based on evidence either
published or from integrated delivery systems. The revisions are to be consistent with rules
applicable to changes in NAIC Model Regulations. The new models C and F are to be available
in 2015. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$0.1 billion for FY2010-
FY2019.
Sec. 10327(c). Elimination of MA Regional Plan Stabilization Fund. MMA created the MA
Regional Program and established the MA Regional Plan Stabilization Fund to encourage plans to
enter into and/or remain in the MA Regional Program. The fund was originally set at $10 billion
with additional money added to the fund from savings in the bidding process. Funds were to be
available from 2007 through the end of 2013. Subsequent legislation decreased the amount of
funds available and delayed their availability. Most recently, MIPPA reduced the initial funding of
the program to one dollar. Money from the regional plan bidding process continued to flow into
the Fund, but availability had been delayed until 2014. PPACA eliminates the Fund and transfers
amounts in the Fund to the Part B Trust Fund. The CBO score is -$0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2014
and -$0.2 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Subtitle D—Medicare Part D Improvements for Prescription Drug Plans and
MA-PD Plans
Sec. 3301 as modified by Sec. 1101 of the Reconciliation Act. Medicare Coverage Gap
Discount Program for Brand-Name Drugs and Closing the Medicare Prescription Drug
“Donut Hole.”
Medicare law sets out a defined standard benefit structure under the Part D prescription drug
benefit that includes a gap in coverage, commonly referred to as the “doughnut hole.” In 2010,
the standard benefit includes a $310 deductible and a 25% coinsurance until the enrollee reaches
$2,830 in total covered drug spending (Medicare and beneficiary spending combined). After this
initial coverage limit is reached, the enrollee is responsible for the full cost of the drugs until total
costs hit the catastrophic threshold, $6,440 in 2010. In general, in 2010, Part D enrollees who do
not receive assistance in the form of the Part D low-income subsidy would be responsible for a
total of $4,550 in out-of-pocket costs before reaching the catastrophic phase ($310 deductible,
$630 in co-insurance in the initial coverage phase, and $3,610 in the coverage gap).49
This provision incorporates a voluntary agreement with the Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) to provide discounts of 50% for brand-name drugs used by
Part D enrollees in the Part D coverage gap. Manufacturers of prescription drugs will be required
to enter into agreements with Medicare Part D drug plan sponsors to provide discounts on drugs
provided to plan enrollees in the coverage gap period beginning January 1, 2011. The amount of
the discount, in addition to the amount actually paid by the enrollee, will count toward costs
incurred by the plan enrollee. Plan enrollees receiving the low-income subsidy or enrolled in an
employee–sponsored retiree drug plan will not be eligible for the discount. Drugs sold and
marketed in the U.S. by a manufacturer will not be covered under Part D unless the manufacturer
agrees to participate in the discount program. The provision also requires the Secretary to contract
49 Part D premiums are not included in the calculation of a beneficiary’s out-of-pocket costs.
Congressional Research Service
54
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
with a third party entity (or entities) to administer the drug discount program and to establish
performance requirements and data standards for the third-party contractor(s).
Section 1101 of the Reconciliation Act added provisions to close the coverage gap by 2020 and to
provide for an immediate reduction in costs for beneficiaries who enter the coverage gap in 2010.
Specifically, in 2010, Medicare Part D enrollees who enter the coverage gap will receive a rebate
of $250. Additionally, the Reconciliation Act reduces beneficiary cost sharing for brand-name
drugs from 100% in 2010 (minus the $250 rebate) to 25% by 2020. In 2011 and 2012, per the
manufacturer discount provision in PPACA, beneficiary cost-sharing will be reduced to 50% of
the price of the drug. In 2013 and beyond, the Medicare program will cover additional costs
beyond the 50% discount to further reduce cost-sharing; in total, beneficiary cost-sharing for
brand-name drugs during the coverage gap will be 47.5% in 2013 and 2014, 45% in 2015 and
2016, 40% in 2017, 35% in 2018, 30% in 2019, and 25% in 2020 and beyond (in 2020, the
manufacturer discounts account for 50% of the reduction and the Medicare Part D program pays
the remaining 25%). For generic drugs, which are not subject the required 50% discount,
beneficiary cost-sharing in the coverage gap will be reduced to 93% in 2011; in 2012 and for each
succeeding year, the percentage will decrease by an additional 7%,50 until 2020 when
beneficiaries’ cost-sharing for generic drugs will equal 25% (in 2020, the Medicare Part D
program will pay 75% of the cost of generic drugs).
The Reconciliation Act also makes several modifications to the methodology used to determine
updates to the total out-of-pocket expenditure amounts for years 2014 through 2019. In general,
these changes will reduce the rate of growth in the total amount that Part D enrollees would need
to spend before reaching the catastrophic threshold for these years.51 The CBO score is +$9.2
billion for FY2010-FY2014 and +$42.6 billion for FY2010-FY2019.52
Sec. 3302. Improvement in Determination of Part D Low-Income Benchmark Premium. The
federal government pays up to 100% of the Part D premiums for low-income subsidy (LIS)
beneficiaries who are enrolled in “benchmark” plans. A Part D plan qualifies as a benchmark plan
if it offers basic Part D coverage with premiums equal to or lower than the regional low-income
premium subsidy amount. MA plans offering prescription drug coverage submit a separate bid for
the Part D portion. Payment for the portion of the premium attributable to basic prescription drug
benefits is calculated in the same way as that for stand-alone PDPs, however an MA plan may
choose to apply some of its Part C rebate payments to lower the Part D premium. If an MA plan
uses rebate payments to reduce its Part D premium, this reduced amount is factored into the
calculation of the regional low-income benchmark. This has the effect of lowering the benchmark
50 Beneficiary cost sharing amounts in 2012 will be 86% of the price of the drug, 79% in 2013, 72% in 2014, 65% in
2015, 58% in 2016, 51% in 2017, 44% in 2018, 37% in 2019, and 25% in 2020.
51 In a preliminary analysis, CBO estimated that the coverage gap provisions in the PPACA and the Reconciliation Act
combined would lead to an average increase in premiums for Part D beneficiaries of about 4% in 2011, rising to about
9% in 2019—an increase of 1% in 2011 and 6% in 2019 from PPACA alone. The increase in premiums is attributed to
the increased value of the drug benefit (premiums represent a percentage of total benefit spending). See “Comparison
of Projected Medicare Part D Premiums Under Current Law and Under Reconciliation Legislation Combined with H.R.
3590 as Passed by the Senate,” March 19, 2010, http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/113xx/doc11355/Comparison.pdf.
52 In its March 11, 2010, analysis of Section 3301 under H.R. 3590 prior to changes made by the Reconciliation Act,
CBO scored the coverage gap discount program alone at a cost of $17.7 billion over 10 years. That projected cost
increase was, in part, based on the expectation that under the provision a larger number of enrollees would reach the
catastrophic phase when Medicare bears most of the costs, and on the possibility that enrollees who switch from
generic to brand-name drugs to take advantage of discounts during the coverage gap may stay on the more expensive
brand-name drugs during the catastrophic period.
Congressional Research Service
55
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
and potentially of reducing the number of plans that qualify as low-income plans. MedPAC has
noted that the number of plans that qualify as low-income benchmark plans has been decreasing
in recent years, resulting in fewer options for LIS enrollees. This provision excludes the Medicare
Advantage rebate amounts from the MA-PDP premium bids when calculating the low-income
regional benchmark. This provision will be effective starting in the 2011 plan year. The CBO
score is +$0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and +$0.7 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3303. Voluntary De Minimus Policy for Subsidy Eligible Individuals Under
Prescription Drug Plans and MA-PD Plans. To help maintain plans that wish to serve LIS
beneficiaries at fully subsidized or $0 premiums, this provision authorizes a policy, beginning in
2011, through which plans that bid a nominal amount above the regional low-income subsidy
(LIS) benchmark amount could choose to absorb the cost of the small difference between their
bid and the LIS benchmark in order to qualify as a LIS-eligible plan. The Secretary has discretion
to auto-enroll LIS beneficiaries into these plans in order to maintain adequate LIS plan choices.
The de minimus threshold amount will be established by the Secretary. The CBO score is +$0.1
billion for FY2010-FY2014 and +$0.4 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3304. Special Rule for Widows and Widowers Regarding Eligibility for Low-Income
Assistance. To qualify for financial assistance under the Part D low-income subsidy (LIS)
program, Medicare beneficiaries must have resources no greater than the income and resource
limits established by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of
2003 (MMA, P.L. 108-173). Each year, the Secretary conducts a redeeming process to determine
whether those who automatically qualified for the full subsidy in a given year continue to meet
the criteria for eligibility in the following year. For those who have qualified for the full or partial
subsidy through the application process, the agency that made the determination decision (SSA or
an individual state) is responsible for monitoring a recipient’s eligibility. For example, for cases in
which eligibility has been established through an application with SSA, a report of a subsidy-
changing event, such as marriage, divorce, or death of a spouse, will trigger a redetermination of
subsidy eligibility during the calendar year. This can result in changes to the individual’s
deductible, premium and cost sharing subsidy, or even termination of his or her LIS eligibility
status. In the case of the death of a spouse, it is possible that the surviving spouse, as the sole
owner of the previously combined resources, may exceed the resource limit for an individual and
may no longer qualify for the LIS program.
This provision requires that, beginning in 2011, the surviving spouse of an LIS-eligible couple
undergo a redetermination of his or her eligibility status no earlier than one year from the next
redetermination that would have occurred after the death of a spouse. Subsequently, the LIS
widow/widower is to be determined or redetermined, as appropriate, for LIS on the same basis as
other LIS-eligible beneficiaries. The CBO score is +$0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and +$0.2
billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3305. Improved Information for Subsidy Eligible Individuals Reassigned to
Prescription Drug Plans and MA-PD Plans. According to the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA, P.L. 108-173), low-income subsidy (LIS)
beneficiaries who are enrolled in plans with premiums below the low-income regional benchmark
amount receive assistance with premiums and cost sharing. Those who are enrolled in LIS-
eligible plans whose plan bids exceed the regional benchmark amount for the next benefit year
are randomly reassigned by the Secretary of HHS to new plans whose bids are at or below the
regional benchmark amount in order to ensure that these beneficiaries continue to receive a
subsidy of plan premiums. It is possible that the new plan’s exceptions, appeals and grievance
Congressional Research Service
56
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
mechanisms could differ from the old plan and that some covered drug(s) a beneficiary is
currently taking would not be covered by the new plan.
In the case of an LIS beneficiary who has been reassigned to another LIS plan, the provision
requires the Secretary, beginning in 2011, to transmit within 30 days of the reassignment
information to the beneficiary about formulary differences between the former plan and the new
plan with respect to the beneficiary’s drug regimen, as well as a description of the beneficiary’s
rights to request a coverage determination, exception or reconsideration, or resolve a grievance.
The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3306. Funding Outreach and Assistance for Low-Income Programs. Section 119 of the
Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA, P.L. 110-275) provided
$25 million for fiscal years 2008 and 2009 for beneficiary outreach and education activities
related to low-income programs related to the Medicare through State Health Insurance
Counseling and Assistance Programs (SHIPs), Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs), Aging and
Disability Resource Centers (ADRCs), and the Administration on Aging (AoA). This provision
extends MIPPA Section 119 and provides an additional $45 million for outreach and education
activities related to Medicare low-income assistance programs, including the Part D low-income
subsidy (LIS) program and the Medicare Savings Program (MSP). Funds are to be allocated to
SHIPs, AAAs, ADRCs, and the National Center for Benefits Outreach and Enrollment in the
same proportion as under MIPPA and will be available for obligation through 2012. The Secretary
was also provided the authority to enlist the support of these entities to conduct outreach activities
aimed at preventing disease and promoting wellness as an additional use of these funds. The CBO
score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3307. Improving Formulary Requirements for Prescription Drug Plans and MA-PD
Plans with Respect to Certain Categories or Classes of Drugs. The Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA, P.L. 108-173) requires Part D plans
to operate formularies that cover drugs within each therapeutic category and class of covered Part
D drugs, although not necessarily all drugs within such categories and classes. The Secretary of
HHS published a regulation (42 CFR Section 423.120) that requires Part D plans to have at least
two drugs within each therapeutic category and class. However, through sub-regulatory guidance,
the Secretary protected access to certain classes of drugs by requiring Part D plans to cover all, or
substantially all, of the drugs in the following six drug classes: immunosuppressant,
antidepressant, antipsychotic, anticonvulsant, antiretroviral, and anti-neoplastic. Section 176 of
the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA, P.L. 110-275)
codified that, beginning in plan year 2010, the Secretary would identify the classes and categories
of drugs that should be protected, or covered entirely by Part D plans, to ensure that beneficiaries
have access to certain therapies and to a wide variety of therapy options for certain conditions and
established certain criteria the Secretary would use to identify such drugs.
This provision of PPACA gives the Secretary authority to identify classes of clinical concern as
defined by the Secretary and PDP sponsors will be required to include all drugs in these classes in
their formularies. The provision also codifies the current six classes of clinical concern as they are
currently specified through sub-regulatory guidance until the Secretary issues a rule regarding
classes of clinical concern to be protected on plan formularies. The provision also removes the
criteria specified in Section 176 of MIPPA that would have been used by the Secretary to identify
protected classes of drugs. The provision will be effective starting the 2011 plan year. The CBO
score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Congressional Research Service
57
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Sec. 3308. Reducing Part D Premium Subsidy for High-Income Beneficiaries. Beginning in
2007, as required by the MMA, high-income beneficiaries are required to pay higher premiums
for Part B benefits. Beneficiaries with modified adjusted gross income that exceeds a threshold
amount are charged additional premiums based on a sliding scale that ranges from 35% to 80% of
the value of Part B. In 2010, threshold levels start at $85,000 for an individual tax return and
$170,000 for a joint return (based on 2008 returns). The threshold amounts are specified in the
law, and are adjusted annually for inflation using the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The income
thresholds are tied to specific premium shares. Beneficiary premiums under Part D are not subject
to income thresholds or means testing. This provision requires Part D enrollees who exceed
certain income thresholds to pay higher premiums. The income thresholds will be set in a similar
manner to those under Part B. The provision will also inflate the income thresholds by the CPI,
except for the period between 2010 and 2019 when the income thresholds would not be updated.
In addition, the provision expands the current authority for IRS to disclose income information to
SSA for purposes of adjusting the Part B subsidy to include the Part D subsidy adjustments. The
CBO score is -$2.4 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$10.7 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3309. Elimination of Cost Sharing for Certain Dual Eligible Individuals. Cost-sharing
subsides for LIS enrollees are linked to the standard Part D prescription drug coverage. Full-
subsidy eligibles have no deductible, minimal cost sharing during the initial coverage period and
coverage gap, and no cost-sharing over the catastrophic threshold. Full-benefit dual eligibles who
are residents of medical institutions or nursing facilities have no cost-sharing. This provision will
eliminate cost sharing for drugs dispensed to beneficiaries receiving care under a home and
community based waiver who would otherwise require institutional care. This provision is
effective on a date specified by the Secretary, but no earlier than January 1, 2012. The CBO score
is +$0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and +$1.1 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3310. Reducing Wasteful Dispensing of Outpatient Prescription Drugs in Long-Term
Care Facilities Under Prescription Drug Plans and MA-PD Plans. Part D plans are required to
offer a contract to any pharmacy willing to participate in its long-term care (LTC) pharmacy
network so long as the pharmacy is capable of meeting certain minimum performance and service
criteria and any other standard terms and conditions established by the plan for its network
pharmacies. Each LTC facility selects at least one eligible LTC pharmacy to provide Medicare
drug benefits to its residents. Plan formularies must be structured so that they meet the needs of
long-term care residents and provide coverage for all medically necessary medications at all
levels of care. Both physician prescribing patterns and pharmacy benefit manager (PBM)
payment practices result in prescriptions commonly being dispensed in 30- or 90-day quantities.
In situations when the full amount dispensed is not utilized by the patient, for example. due to
discharge, death, adverse reactions, the remaining medication may become waste. This provision
will require Part D sponsors, starting January 1, 2012, to employ utilization management
techniques, determined by the Secretary in consultation with relevant stakeholders, to reduce the
quantity dispensed per fill when dispensing medications to beneficiaries who reside in long-term
care facilities in order to reduce waste associated with 30-day fills. These techniques could
include such things as weekly, daily, or automated dose dispensing. The CBO score is
-$1.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$5.7 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3311. Improved Medicare Prescription Drug Plan and MA-PD Complaint System.
Part D and Medicare Advantage (MA) related complaints are tracked and resolved through a
centralized complaints system within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS),
while complaints submitted directly to plan sponsors (grievances) are tracked and resolved by
each plan sponsor using its own system. CMS maintains a central repository of MA and Part D-
Congressional Research Service
58
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
related complaints received by its Regional Offices, Central Office, or through 1-800-
MEDICARE. This provision requires the Secretary to develop and maintain a system, which is
widely known and easy to use, to handle complaints regarding MA and Part D plans or their
sponsors. The system is to have the ability to report and initiate appropriate interventions and
monitoring based on substantial complaints and to guide quality improvement. A plan complaint
is defined as a complaint that is received (including by telephone, letter, e-mail, or any other
means) by the Secretary (including by a regional office, the Medicare Beneficiary Ombudsman, a
sub-contractor, a carrier, a fiscal intermediary, or a Medicare Administrative Contractor). The
Secretary is required to develop a model electronic complaint form to be used for reporting
complaints under the system that would be displayed on the Medicare.gov and Medicare
Beneficiary Ombudsman websites. The Secretary is also required to conduct annual reports of the
complaint system that would include an analysis of the numbers and types of complaints reported
under the system; geographic variations in the complaints; the timeliness of agency or plan
responses to the complaints; and the resolution of the complaints. The CBO score is $0.0 billion
for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3312. Uniform Exceptions and Appeals Process for Prescription Drug Plans and MA-
PD Plans. Section 1852(g) of the Social Security Act outlines general requirements regarding
Medicare Advantage exceptions and appeals processes. The Part D program adapted many of the
existing rules for appeals that apply to Medicare Advantage program. The coverage and
determination and appeals processes may vary among MA and Part D plans as long as these
general requirements are met. This provision will require a prescription drug plan sponsor or a
MA organization offering MA-PD plans to use a single, uniform exceptions and appeals process
with respect to the determination of prescription drug coverage for an enrollee under the plan and
to provide instant access to this process through a toll-free telephone number and an Internet
website. This provision will apply to exceptions and appeals made on or after January 1, 2012.
The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3313. Office of the Inspector General Studies and Reports. According to Section 1860D-
14 of the SSA, full-benefit dual-eligible individuals who have not elected a Part D plan are to be
auto-enrolled into one by CMS. Because plans vary in the formularies they offer, some dual
eligibles could find that they have been auto-enrolled in a plan that may not best meet their needs.
Additionally, when the Medicare prescription drug program was created, it was expected that
drug plan sponsors would negotiate with drug manufacturers to obtain price concessions on drugs
covered under Part D, and thus reduce total costs to the government and to beneficiaries. Some
studies have suggested that Part D plans are not obtaining rebates equivalent to those required
under Medicaid.
PPACA requires the Office of Inspector General of HHS (OIG) to report annually, beginning
July 1, 2011, on the extent to which formularies used by prescription drug plans and MA-PD
plans under Part D include drugs commonly used by full-benefit dual eligible individuals. OIG is
also required to complete a study by October 1, 2011, that compares covered prescription drug
prices paid under the Medicare Part D program to those negotiated by state Medicaid plans for the
top 200 drugs determined by both volume and expenditures including all rebates and discounts
received by the Medicaid and Part D plans. The report is not to disclose information that is
deemed proprietary or likely to negatively impact a Medicaid program or Part D plans’ ability to
negotiate drug prices. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2019.
Congressional Research Service
59
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Sec. 3314. Including Costs Incurred By AIDS Drug Assistance Programs And Indian Health
Service In Providing Prescription Drugs Toward The Annual Out Of Pocket Threshold
Under Part D. Under a standard Medicare Part D plan design, beneficiaries must incur a certain
level of out-of-pocket costs ($4,550 in 2010) before catastrophic protection begins. These include
costs that are incurred for the deductible, cost-sharing, or benefits not paid because they fall in the
coverage gap. Generally, costs are counted as incurred, and thus treated as true out-of-pocket
(true out-of-pocket) costs only if they are paid by the individual (or by another family member on
behalf of the individual), paid on behalf of a low-income individual under the subsidy provisions,
or paid under a State Pharmaceutical Assistance Program. Additional payments that do not count
toward TrOOP include Part D premiums and coverage by other insurance, including group health
plans, workers’ compensation, Part D plans’ supplemental or enhanced benefits, or other third
parties. This provision will allow costs paid by the Indian Health Service or under an AIDS Drug
Assistance Program to count toward the out-of-pocket threshold for costs incurred on or after
January 1, 2011. The CBO score is +$0.2 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and +$0.6 billion for
FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3315. Immediate Reduction in Coverage Gap in 2010 (repealed by Section 1101 of the
Reconciliation Act).
Sec. 10328. Improvement in Part D Medication Therapy Management (MTM) Programs.
Section 1860-D-4(c) of the SSA requires Part D sponsors to incorporate a Medication Therapy
Management Program (MTM) into their plan benefit structures. An MTM program is a program
of drug therapy management that may be furnished by a pharmacist and is designed to assure,
with respect to targeted beneficiaries, that covered Part D drugs are appropriately used to
optimize therapeutic outcomes through improved medication use and to reduce the risk of adverse
events. Targeted individuals are those who have multiple chronic diseases, are taking multiple
covered part D drugs, and are identified to likely incur annual costs for covered Part D drugs that
exceed a level specified by the Secretary. The MTM program may include elements that promote
enrollee understanding of the appropriate use of medication and increased adherence with
medication regimes, and must be developed in cooperation with licensed and practicing
pharmacists and physicians. This provision amends Section 1860D-4(c) to require Part D
sponsors to include in their MTM programs an annual comprehensive medication review
furnished in person or using telehealth technologies by a licensed pharmacist or other qualified
provider, and follow-up interventions as warranted based on the findings of the annual review or
the targeted medication enrollment starting in plan years beginning on or after the date that is
2 years after the date of enactment. Additionally, the plan sponsor will be required to have in
place a process to assess on a quarterly basis the medication use of individuals who are at risk but
not enrolled in the MTM program, including individuals who have experienced a transition in
care. The plan sponsor will also be required to have in place a process to automatically enroll
targeted beneficiaries in the MTM program and permit such beneficiaries to opt out of enrollment
in the program. The Secretary of HHS has been given authority to modify or broaden
requirements for MTM programs and to study new MTM models through the Center for
Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (as added by Section 3021). The CBO score is $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Subtitle E—Ensuring Medicare Sustainability
Sec. 3401 as modified by Sec. 10319 of PPACA, and Sec. 1105 of the Reconciliation Act.
Revision of Certain Market Basket Updates and Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market Basket Updates That Do Not Already Incorporate Such
Congressional Research Service
60
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Improvements. Most fee-for-service Medicare providers receive predetermined payment
amounts established under different, unique prospective payment systems. Each year, the base
payment amounts in the different Medicare payment systems are increased by an update factor to
reflect the increase in the unit costs associated with providing health care services. Generally,
Medicare’s annual updates are linked to either: (1) projected changes in specific market basket
(MB) indices which are designed to measure the change in the price of goods and services (such
as labor and equipment) that are purchased by the provider and intended to reflect the effect of
inflation on providers’ costs per service; or (2) the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consumers (CPI-U). Generally, PPACA provides for updates based on the MB or CPI minus full
productivity estimates for all Parts A and B providers and suppliers who are subject to a MB or
CPI update. The productivity offset is to equal the percentage change in the 10-year moving
average of annual economy-wide private nonfarm business multi-factor productivity. The
estimate used will be that published before the promulgation of the regulation establishing
increases in the Medicare rates for the year or period.
Specifically, this provision will implement a full productivity adjustment for inpatient hospital
services, inpatient rehabilitation, long-term care hospital services, skilled nursing facilities and
hospices beginning October 1, 2012, for inpatient psychiatric facilities beginning July 1, 2012, for
hospital outpatient departments beginning January 1, 2012, and for home health providers
beginning in October 1, 2014. For providers paid through the clinical laboratory test fee schedule,
the proposal will replace the scheduled 0.5% payment reduction for calendar years 2011 through
2013 with a full productivity adjustment for calendar year (CY) 2011 and subsequent years.
Dialysis providers will be subject to the productivity adjustment starting in CY2012; the
productivity adjustments for other Part B providers will begin in CY2011. Except where noted
below, the application of the update adjustments may result in a negative factor and a basis of
payment that would be lower than in the preceding year. The update factors for Medicare
providers and suppliers will be subject to the following adjustments:
Acute care hospitals, long-term care hospitals, inpatient rehabilitation facilities, inpatient
psychiatric facilities, and outpatient hospitals: Aside from the productivity factors mentioned
earlier, the MB update for acute care inpatient (IPPS) services and inpatient rehabilitation
facilities (IRFs) will be reduced 0.25 percentage points starting in FY2010, effective for
discharges starting April 1, 2010) and FY2011; 0.1 percentage points in FY2012 and FY2013; 0.3
percentage points in FY2014; 0.2 percentage points in FY2015 and FY2016; and 0.75 percentage
points in FY2017 though FY2019. These same reductions also apply to the update for long-term
care hospitals except that a larger reduction of 0.5 percentage points will apply starting October 1,
2010 (RY2010). The MB update for the hospital outpatient prospective system will be reduced
0.25 percentage points in CY2010 and CY2011 and by 0.1 percentage points in CY2012 and
CY2013. 0.3 percentage points in CY2014; 0.2 percentage points in CY2015 and CY2016; and
0.75 percentage points in CY2017 though CY2019. Skilled nursing facilities: The SNF MB
update will be subject to the productivity factor adjustment beginning in FY2012. Home health
agencies: Aside from the productivity factor adjustment beginning in 2015, the MB update for
home health services will be reduced by 1.0 percentage point in CY2011, CY2012, and CY2013.
Hospice care: The hospice MB update will be subject to the productivity factor adjustment
beginning in FY2013. Aside from the productivity factor adjustment, the MB update will be
reduced by 0.3 percentage points in FY2013. For each of the fiscal years from FY2014 through
FY2019, a 0.3 percentage point reduction to the MB will be contingent upon the level of the
insured population relative to the projection of insured population for the year preceding
enactment. Specifically, only if the level of non-elderly insured population is 5 or fewer
percentage points above the projections would the MB update be reduced by 0.3 percentage
Congressional Research Service
61
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
points. Dialysis: The ESRD MB will no longer be subject to a 1 percentage point reduction
beginning in 2012, but will be subject to the productivity factor adjustments starting in CY2012.
Ambulance services: The productivity adjustment factor will be applied to the CPI-U used to
increase the ambulance fee schedule starting in CY2011. Ambulatory surgical services: The
productivity adjustment factor will be applied to the CPI-U used to update payments for
ambulatory surgical services starting in CY2011. Laboratory services: The existing 0.5
percentage point reduction to the CPI-U update to the fee schedule in CY2009 and CY2010 will
be retained. A 1.75 percentage point reduction to the update in CY2011 through CY2015 will be
established; this reduction may result in a negative update. The productivity adjustment factor
will be applied to the CPI-U starting in CY2011, but in the application of the adjustment will not
be able to reduce the increase to less than zero. Certain durable medical equipment: The
productivity adjustment factor will be applied to the CPI-U used to increase the fee schedules for
certain durable medical equipment (DME) beginning in CY2011. Certain DME would have
received a payment increase of CPI-U plus 2 percentage points in CY2014. The 2 percentage
point increase was eliminated. Prosthetic devices, orthotics, and prosthetics: The productivity
adjustment factor will be applied to the CPI-U update for the applicable fee schedule for this
DME category starting in CY2011. Other items: The productivity adjustment factor will be
applied to the CPI-U update for this DME category starting in CY2011. (See Appendix B for
timeline of update reductions including productivity adjustments.) The CBO score is -$23.7
billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$156.6 billion for FY2010-FY2019.53
Sec. 3402. Temporary Adjustment to the Calculation of Part B Premiums. Medicare Part B
finances coverage for physicians’ and other outpatient services, in part, through premiums paid by
beneficiaries who enroll in the voluntary program. Before January 2007, the Part B premium was
set at 25% of the program’s costs per aged enrollee (enrollees who were age 65 or older) and was
applied universally to all enrollees. Since then, under a provision of the Medicare Modernization
Act, approximately 1.7 million higher-income beneficiaries have faced progressively greater
shares of those costs—35 percent, 50 percent, 65 percent, or 80 percent, depending on income.
The income categories that those shares apply to are based on enrollees’ modified adjusted gross
income. In 2010, the income thresholds for those premium shares are $85,000, $107,000,
$160,000, and $214,000, respectively. (For married couples, the corresponding income thresholds
are twice those values.) The income thresholds rise each year with changes in the consumer price
index. The provision will freeze the current income thresholds for the period of 2011 through
2019 at the 2010 levels. The CBO score is -$7.5 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and is -$25.0 billion
for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 3403 as modified by Sec. 10320. Independent Payment Advisory Board.54 This provision
establishes an Independent Payment Advisory Board to develop and submit detailed proposals to
Congress and the President to reduce Medicare spending. The Board is to consist of 15 members
with expertise in health care financing, delivery, and organization. All members are to be
appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Proposals are to primarily focus on
payments to MA and PDP plans and reimbursement rates for certain providers. The Board will be
prohibited from developing proposals related to Medicare benefits, eligibility, or financing.
Proposals, which will only be required in certain years, will have to meet specific savings targets.
Recommendations made by the Board automatically go into effect unless Congress enacts
53 The effect of the productivity adjustment for home health service is included in the estimate for Sec. 3131.
54 Name changed from Independent Medicare Advisory Board by Sec. 10320.
Congressional Research Service
62
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
specific legislation to prevent their implementation. The first year the Board’s proposals can take
effect is 2015.
Membership and Structure. The Board is to be composed of 15 members, appointed by the
President with the advice and consent of the Senate. Members of the Board will serve six-year,
staggered terms. Members may not serve more than 2 full consecutive terms. The Senate Majority
Leader, the Speaker of the House, the Senate Minority Leader, and the House Minority Leader
will each present three recommendations for appointees to the President. The President, with the
advice and consent of the Senate, is required to appoint a Chair for the Board. The Board will
elect a Vice Chairman. Members can only be removed by the President for neglect of duty or
malfeasance in office. In addition to the 15 members of the Board, the Secretary of Health and
Human Services (HHS), the Administrator of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
(CMS), and the Administrator of the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) will
serve as ex-officio, non-voting members of the Board.
Qualifications for membership are similar to the qualifications required for members of the
Medicare Payment Advisory Board (MedPAC). Individuals involved in the delivery or
management of health care services cannot constitute a majority of the Board. In addition to these
qualifications, the President is required to establish a system for publicly disclosing any financial
or other conflicts of interests relating to members. Individuals that engage in any other business,
vocation, or employment cannot serve as appointed members of the Board. Members will be
considered officers in the executive branch for purposes of applying Title I of the Ethics in
Government Act of 1978. After serving on the Board, former members will be barred from
lobbying the Board and other relevant executive branch departments and agencies and relevant
congressional committees for one year.
The Chair will be responsible for exercising all of the Board’s executive and administrative
functions, including those related to the appointment and supervision of employees and the use of
funds. All requests for discretionary appropriations to fund the Board’s activities must be
approved by a majority vote.
Requirements for Proposal Submission. The provision requires that the Board submit proposals
to the President for years in which the projected rate of growth in Medicare spending per
beneficiary exceeds a target growth rate. Determinations of the projected and target growth rates
are to be made by the CMS Office of the Actuary (OACT) beginning in 2013.55 The Board is
required to submit its first proposal to the President by January 15, 2014, for implementation in
2015. If the Board fails to submit a proposal to the President by January 15, the Secretary will be
required to submit a contingent proposal to Congress meeting the same requirements by
January 25.
For years 2014 through 2017, the Board will be required to submit proposals for years in which
the projected rate of growth in Medicare spending per beneficiary exceeds the average of the
projected percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI) and
the Consumer Price Index for Medical Care (CPI-M). Beginning in 2018, proposals will only be
required for years in which the projected rate of growth in Medicare spending exceeds the Gross
55 The projected Medicare growth rate per beneficiary is to be calculated as a projected five-year average of the growth
in Medicare spending. Projections are to assume a zero update in payments for physicians. The projection will also be
required to take into account any delivery system reforms or payment changes that have not yet been implemented.
Congressional Research Service
63
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Domestic Product (GDP) plus 1.0%. Recommendations proposed by the Board are required to
reduce Medicare spending by the lesser of 0.5 percentage points in 2015, 1.0 percentage points in
2016, 1.25 percentage points in 2017, 1.5 percentage points in 2018, and the amount by which the
rate of growth in Medicare spending exceeds the target growth rate. Proposals cannot increase
Medicare spending over a 10-year period.
Scope of Proposals. The provision lays out a number of specific fiscal and policy criteria which
the Board will be required to meet in making its recommendations. When developing and
submitting proposals, the Board is required, to the extent feasible, to (1) prioritize
recommendations that would extend Medicare solvency and target reductions to sources of excess
cost growth; (2) include only those recommendations that improve the health care delivery
system, including the promotion of integrated care, care coordination, prevention and wellness
and quality improvement and protect beneficiary access to care, including in rural and frontier
areas; (3) consider the effects of changes in provider and supplier payments on beneficiaries;
consider the effects of proposals on any provider who has, or is projected to have, negative profit
margins or payment updates; (4) consider the unique needs of individuals dually eligible for
Medicare and Medicaid, and (5) include recommendations for administrative funding to carry out
its recommendations.
As appropriate, each proposal is required to include recommendations that would reduce
spending in Medicare Parts C and D. Reductions could be obtained by reducing Medicare
payments for administrative expenses to MA and PDP plans, denying or removing high bids for
drug coverage from the calculation of the monthly bid amount for Part D plans, and reducing
performance bonuses for MA plans. Recommendations may not target the base beneficiary
premium percentage or the full premium subsidy for Part D plans.
The Board is prohibited from making recommendations that would ration care, raise revenues,
increase beneficiary premiums, increase beneficiary cost-sharing, restrict benefits, or modify
eligibility. Additionally, proposals submitted before December 2018 for implementation in 2020,
cannot include recommendations that would reduce payments to providers and suppliers
scheduled to receive a reduction in their payment updates in excess of a reduction due to
productivity.
Presidential Review. At the beginning of the year following the determination by the Secretary,
the Advisory Board is to submit its recommendations to the President who is to, in turn,
immediately submit them to Congress. The provision dictates certain information which must
accompany the Advisory Board’s submission, including a requirement for legislative language
implementing the recommendations.
Congressional Consideration. Section 3403 directs the Secretary to automatically implement the
Board’s recommendations unless Congress, by August 15 of the year in which the
recommendations are submitted, enacts legislation superseding the Board’s proposal. The
provision establishes special “fast track” parliamentary procedures governing congressional
consideration of legislation implementing the Board’s recommendations. These fast track
procedures differ from the normal parliamentary mechanisms used by the chambers to consider
most legislation and are designed to ensure that Congress, should it choose to do so, can act
quickly on the proposal put forth by the Advisory Board.
The fast track procedures established by the provision mandate the introduction of the Board’s
legislative proposal by the House and Senate majority leaders “by request” on the day it is
Congressional Research Service
64
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
submitted to Congress. When introduced, such legislation is to be referred to the Senate
Committee on Finance and to the House Committees on Energy and Commerce and Ways and
Means. These committees may mark up the measure, and must report it to their respective
chambers not later than April 1 or be discharged of its further consideration. The expedited
procedure waives the provisions of Senate Rule XV, which would ordinarily bar the Finance
Committee from reporting a committee amendment containing significant matter not in its
jurisdiction so long as the amendment in question “is relevant” to a proposal in the Advisory
Board bill.
The provision also restricts the House or Senate from considering any amendment (including
committee amendment), bill, or conference report which would repeal or change the Board’s
recommendations unless those changes meet the same fiscal and policy criteria (described above)
that the Board was required to meet in developing its recommendations. PPACA provides for this
restriction to apply not only to House and Senate consideration of the Board legislation submitted
by the President, but to all other legislation Congress considers as well. This restriction may be
waived solely by a vote of three-fifths of the Members.
No expedited procedures are established for initial House floor consideration of the Board’s
legislation. In the Senate, a motion to proceed to consider the legislation is privileged and not
debatable. Amendments offered to the legislation on the Senate floor must be germane and may
not reduce the savings in Medicare per capita growth below established targets. Debate in the
Senate on each amendment to the bill is limited and overall Senate consideration of the legislation
may not exceed 30 hours, after which a final vote will be taken on it. In the event that there is a
need to resolve bicameral differences on the legislation, debate on any conference report or
amendment exchange is limited to no more than 10 hours, after which a final vote will occur.
Should the measure be vetoed, Senate debate on a veto message is limited to one hour.
Fast Track Consideration of Legislation to Discontinue Payment Advisory Board. The
provision establishes an additional set of fast track parliamentary procedures governing House
and Senate consideration of a joint resolution to discontinue the Independent Payment Advisory
Board and the “automatic” process of implementation described above. These procedures ensure
that the House and Senate may act promptly on such a measure by limiting debate and
amendment at the committee and floor level. The procedures also establish a supermajority
requirement of three-fifths of Members duly chosen and sworn for passage of such a joint
resolution in each chamber.56
Implementation by the Secretary. The Secretary is required to implement the Board’s
recommendations by August 15 of the year in which the proposal was submitted. Any
recommendation that would change a provider’s payment rate will apply on the first day of the
first fiscal year, calendar year, or rate year (which varies depending on provider type) after
August 15th.
Beginning in 2019, the Secretary will be prohibited from implementing the Board’s
recommendations if two conditions are met: (1) the Board was required to submit a proposal to
Congress in the preceding year, and (2) the OACT determined that the rate of growth in per capita
NHE exceeded the rate of growth in per capita Medicare spending. These restrictions are not to
56 If such a joint resolution were vetoed, it would require a two-third’s vote of each chamber to override and enact the
measure.
Congressional Research Service
65
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
affect requirements pertaining to the Board’s submission of proposals to Congress or the rules
related to congressional consideration of these proposals.
Additional Review Procedures. The Board must submit a draft copy of each proposal it develops
to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and to the Secretary for review.
Advisory Functions. Beginning in 2014, for any year the Board is not required to submit a
proposal to the President and Congress, the Board will be required to submit to Congress advisory
reports on matters related to the Medicare program. Prior to 2020, these reports may include
recommendations to improve payment systems for those providers and suppliers exempted from
the Board’s recommendations.
Beginning in 2015, the provision also requires that the Board submit to Congress and the
President advisory recommendations to slow the rate of growth in NHE. These recommendations
could not target expenditures in federal health care programs. The Board will be required to
coordinate these recommendations, which must be made available to the public, with those
contained in other Board proposals and advisory reports. Recommendations, which are required
at a minimum once every two years, could be implemented either administratively by the
Secretary or legislatively by Congress. These advisory reports will not be subject to the rules for
congressional consideration.
Funding. The provision appropriates $15 million to the Board to carry out its functions beginning
in year 2012. This amount will increase by the rate of inflation for each year thereafter. Sixty
percent of the appropriation will come from the Part A Medicare Trust Fund and 40% from the
Part B Trust Fund.
Oversight Mechanisms. The provision establishes a consumer advisory council to advise the
Board on the impact of payment policies on consumers. The Council is to be composed of 10
consumer representatives appointed by the Comptroller General of the United States, each from
among the 10 regions established by the Secretary. The provision also requires the GAO to
conduct a study on changes in payment policies, methodologies, rates, and coverage policies
under Medicare resulting from the Board’s proposal. Specifically, the study is to provide an
assessment of the effect of the Board’s proposal on Medicare beneficiary’s access to providers,
affordability of premiums and cost-sharing, the potential impact of changes on other government
or private sector purchasers of care, and the quality of care provided. The report is due by July 1,
2015. The GAO is to conduct additional studies as appropriate. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2014 and -$15.5 billion for FY2015-FY2019.57
Subtitle G—Protecting and Improving Guaranteed Medicare Benefits
Sec. 3601. Protecting and Improving Guaranteed Medicare Benefits. This section requires
that that no provisions in PPACA may result in a reduction in Medicare benefits currently
guaranteed under Title XVIII. This section also requires that Medicare savings achieved under the
PPACA are to be used to extend the solvency of the Medicare trust funds, reduce Medicare
57 Subtitle F on health care quality improvements is discussed in CRS Report R40943, Public Health, Workforce,
Quality, and Related Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148), coordinated by C.
Stephen Redhead and Erin D. Williams.
Congressional Research Service
66
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
premiums and other cost-sharing for beneficiaries, improve or expand guaranteed Medicare
benefits, and protect access to Medicare providers. This provision was not scored by CBO.
Sec. 3602. No Cuts in Guaranteed Benefits. Under prior law, MA plans were required to
provide all Medicare covered benefit except hospice. This provision requires that nothing in the
PPACA may result in the reduction or elimination of any benefits guaranteed by law to
participants in Medicare Advantage plans. This provision was not scored by CBO.
Title IV—Prevention of Chronic Disease and Improving
Public Health
Subtitle B—Increasing Access to Clinical Prevention Services.58
Sec. 4103 as modified by 10402(b). Medicare Coverage of Annual Wellness Visit Providing a
Personalized Prevention Plan.59 Medicare covers a one-time initial preventive physical
examination (IPPE), for purposes of health promotion and disease detection, which includes
education, counseling, and referrals with respect to screening and other preventive services. The
IPPE is reimbursable only if provided within one year of Medicare Part B enrollment. Medicare
does not otherwise cover periodic routine health examinations (i.e., those provided in the absence
of symptoms).
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), administered by the HHS Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), is an independent panel of private-sector experts in
primary care and prevention that conducts assessments of scientific evidence of the effectiveness
of a broad range of clinical preventive services, including screening, counseling, and preventive
medications.60 It provides evidence-based recommendations for the use of preventive services,
which may vary depending on age, gender, and risk factors for disease, among other
considerations. Services are given a grade of A, B, C, D or an I Statement. Services graded A or B
are recommended. For services graded C, the USPSTF makes no recommendation for or against
their routine use. For services graded D, the USPSTF recommends against routinely providing the
service to asymptomatic patients, based on evidence that the service is not beneficial, and may be
harmful. “I” Statements are provided when evidence is insufficient to support a recommendation.
This provision amends SSA§1861 to require that Medicare Part B cover, without cost-sharing,
“personalized prevention plan services,” including a comprehensive health risk assessment
58 All other provisions in Title IV are addressed in CRS Report R40943, Public Health, Workforce, Quality, and
Related Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148), coordinated by C. Stephen
Redhead and Erin D. Williams.
59 An adopted amendment could affect the implementation of several provisions in the PPACA, including sections
4103, 4104, and 4105 (discussed in this report). On December 2, 2009, the Senate adopted S.Amdt. 2808, introduced
by Senator Vitter, which would provide that “for the purposes of this Act, and for the purposes of any other provisions
of law, the current recommendations of the Unite States Preventive Services Task Force regarding breast cancer
screening, mammography, and prevention shall be considered the most current other than those issued in or around
November 2009.” Previously, the panel had recommended routine screening for women beginning at age 40; in
November 2009, it recommended that routine screening begin at age 50. The USPSTF and the relationship between its
recommendations and coverage decisions is discussed further in CRS Report R40978, Medicare Coverage of Clinical
Preventive Services, by Sarah A. Lister and Kirsten J. Colello.
60 See the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstfix.htm.
Congressional Research Service
67
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
beginning on January 1, 2011. The personalized plan can include several specified elements,
including medical and family history, identification of health risk factors, and a plan for
preventive screenings. All enrolled beneficiaries will be eligible for personalized prevention plan
services once every year without any cost-sharing. During the first year of Part B enrollment,
beneficiaries can receive only the IPPE. Beneficiaries will be eligible to receive personalized
prevention plan services each year thereafter provided that the beneficiary has not received either
an IPPE or personalized prevention plan services within the preceding 12 months. The Secretary
is required to develop appropriate guidance and conduct outreach and related activities with
respect to personalized prevention plan services and health risk assessments. These services are
included in the list of Medicare covered preventive services under Sec. 4104 of PPACA. The
CBO score is $1.4 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $3.6 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 4104. Removal of Barriers to Preventive Services in Medicare. Section 1833(a) of the
SSA establishes coinsurance for the beneficiary, generally requiring Medicare to cover 80% of the
costs of covered services under Part B, with specified exceptions. Section 1833(b) establishes an
annual deductible for which the beneficiary is responsible. These sections have been amended
over the years to waive coinsurance and/or the deductible for many, but not all, covered
preventive services.
The provision amends SSA Sec. 1861 to define preventive services covered by Medicare to mean
a specified list of currently covered services, including colorectal cancer screening services even
if diagnostic or treatment services were furnished in connection with the screening. The list also
includes the IPPE, as well as the personalized prevention plan services that are covered pursuant
to Sec. 4103 of PPACA. Coverage will continue to be subject to all criteria that apply to each
preventive service covered under prior law. The provision also amends SSA Sec. 1833 to waive
beneficiary coinsurance requirements for most preventive services, requiring Medicare to cover
100% of the costs. Services for which no coinsurance will be required are the IPPE, personalized
prevention plan services, any additional preventive service covered under the Secretary’s
administrative authority, and any currently covered preventive service (including medical
nutrition therapy, and excluding electrocardiograms) if it is recommended with a grade of A or B
by the USPSTF. The provision generally waives the application of the deductible for the same
types of preventive services noted above for which coinsurance would be waived. It does not,
however, waive the application of the deductible for any additional preventive service covered
under the Secretary’s administrative authority. The CBO score is $0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2014
and $0.8 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 4105. Evidence-Based Coverage of Medicare Preventive Services. The provision
authorizes the Secretary to modify the coverage of any currently covered preventive service
(including services included in the IPPE, but not the IPPE itself), to the extent that the
modification is consistent with USPSTF recommendations. The provision also allows the
Secretary to withhold payment for any currently covered preventive service graded D (i.e., not
recommended) by the USPSTF. The enhanced authority and the prohibition do not apply to
services furnished for the purposes of diagnosis or treatment (rather than as preventive services
furnished to asymptomatic patients). The CBO score is -$0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$0.7 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Subtitle C—Creating Healthier Communities.
Sec. 4202. Medicare Demonstration: Promotion of Healthy Lifestyles. Subsection (b) of this
provision requires the Secretary to conduct an evaluation of community-based prevention and
Congressional Research Service
68
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
wellness programs, and based on findings, develop a plan for promoting healthy lifestyles and
chronic disease self-management for Medicare beneficiaries. The evaluation is to include an
evidence review of literature, best practices, and resources, and an evaluation of existing
community prevention and wellness programs sponsored by the Administration on Aging. To
fund the evaluation, the Secretary is required to transfer to CMS $50 million in total from the Part
A and Part B Trust Funds, in whatever proportion the Secretary determines. Activities under this
evaluation will not be subject to review under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, which
subjects collections of information from the public to clearance by OMB. The CBO score is
$0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 4204. Immunizations. Among other requirements, this section requires GAO to conduct a
study and report to Congress on the impact of the coverage of vaccines under Medicare Part D on
access to those vaccines by beneficiaries who are 65 years of age or older. The section
appropriates $1 million for FY2010 for this study. The CBO score is $0.0 for FY2010-FY2014
and $0.0 for FY2010-FY2019.
Title V—Health Care Workforce
Subtitle F—Strengthening Primary Care and Other Workforce Improvements61
Sec. 5501. Expanding Access to Primary Care Services and General Surgery Services.
Medicare uses a fee schedule to reimburse physicians for the services they provide. In certain
circumstances, physicians receive an additional payment to encourage targeted activities. These
bonuses, typically a percentage increase above the Medicare fee schedule amounts, can be
awarded for a number of activities including demonstrating quality achievements, participating in
electronic prescribing, or practicing in underserved areas. For instance, Section 1833(m) of the
Social Security Act provides bonus payments for physicians who furnish medical care services in
geographic areas that are designated by the Health Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA) as primary medical care health professional shortage areas (HPSAs) under Section 332
(a)(1)(A) of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act. The bonus payment equals 10% of what would
otherwise be paid under the fee schedule.
The provision establishes a new 10% bonus on select evaluation & management (E&M) and
general surgery codes under the Medicare fee schedule for five years, beginning January 1, 2011.
The primary care service codes to which this bonus applies will be office visits, nursing facility
visits, and home visits. The bonus will be available to primary care practitioners who (1) are
physicians who have a specialty designation of family medicine, internal medicine, geriatric
medicine, or pediatric medicine, or are nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, or physician
assistants, and (2) furnish 60% of their services in the select codes.
Practitioners providing major surgical procedures in health professional shortage areas will also
be eligible for a bonus under this provision. Over the same five year period beginning January 1,
2011, general surgeons providing care in a HPSA will be eligible for a 10% bonus on major
61 All other Title V provisions are discussed in CRS Report R40943, Public Health, Workforce, Quality, and Related
Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148), coordinated by C. Stephen Redhead and
Erin D. Williams.
Congressional Research Service
69
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
surgical procedure codes, defined as surgical procedures for which a 10-day or 90-day global
period is used for payment under the Medicare fee schedule.
The review and adjustment of RVUs (under Section 1848(c)(2)(B)) will be adjusted for these
incentives; only half (50%) of the cost of the bonuses are to be taken into consideration in the
budget neutrality calculation in 2011 and in subsequent years, with an across-the-board reduction
to all codes (through a modification of the conversion factor) accounting for the adjustment,
except for physicians who primarily provide services in health professionals shortage areas. The
CBO score is $2.5 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and is $3.5 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 10501(i). Development and Implementation of Prospective Payment System (PPS) for
FQHCs. A federally qualified health center (FQHC) is a type of provider defined by the
Medicare and Medicaid statutes. FQHCs include all organizations receiving grants under section
330 of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA), clinics that have been certified as meeting such
requirements (called FQHC Look-Alikes) or outpatient facilities that are operated by tribal
organization or urban Indian organizations. FQHC services are defined by Medicare statute as
rural health clinic services (such as physician services, those provided by physician assistants,
nurse practitioners, nurse midwives, visiting nurses, clinical psychologist or social workers and
related services and supplies), diabetes outpatient self-management training services, medical
nutrition therapy services and preventive primary health services required under section 330 of
the Public Health Service Act (PHSA).62
FQHCs receive cost-based reimbursement from Medicare, subject to a per-visit payment limit
and certain productivity standards. Medicare pays FQHCs on an interim basis for covered
services furnished to beneficiaries using an all-inclusive rate for each visit (except for certain
vaccines which are paid on a cost basis). Generally, the FQHC’s final payment rate is calculated
by dividing the FQHC’s total allowable cost for such services by the total visits which is subject
to the maximum per-visit payment limit. The payment limits are increased each year by the
Medicare Economic Index (MEI) and are different for urban and rural FQHCs. The upper
payment limit per visit for urban FQHCs is $119.29 starting January 1, 2009, through December
31, 2009, and per visit limit for rural FQHCs is $102.58 effective January 1, 2009.
This provision repealed Sec. 5502 established earlier in the legislation. Under Sec. 10501(i),
effective for services starting on January 1, 2011, the statutory definition of FQHC services will
include the Medicare definition of preventive services at 1861(ddd)(3) that were established in
Section 2002 of PPACA. These services include screening and preventive services (other than
electrocardiograms), an initial preventive physical examination, and personalized prevention plan
services. The cross reference to preventive services in the PHSA will be retained.
The Secretary is to develop a prospective payment system (PPS) for FQHC services as
established by a new Section 1834(o) of the SSA. The PPS will establish payment rates for
specific codes that take into account the type, intensity and duration of services and can include
appropriate geographic adjusters. FQHCs will be required to submit necessary data no later than
January 1, 2011. The new payment system will be established for cost reporting periods
beginning on or after October 1, 2014. Initial FQHC payments under the new PPS are to equal
62 The preventive services as defined by the PHSA include prenatal and perinatal services; appropriate cancer
screening; well-child services; immunizations against vaccine-preventable diseases; screenings for elevated blood lead
levels, communicable diseases, and cholesterol; pediatric eye, ear, and dental screenings to determine the need for
vision and hearing correction and dental care; voluntary family planning services; preventive dental services.
Congressional Research Service
70
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
100% of reasonable costs (determined without application of a per visit payment limit or
productivity screen) that would have been reimbursed if the PPS system had not been
implemented. In subsequent years, payments rates will be increased by the MEI (in the first year)
or by a MB promulgated by regulations if available. FQHC payment codes may be implemented
by program instruction. Program payments for FQHC services will be made at 80% of the lesser
of actual charge or the PPS amount. FQHCs that contract with MA plans will receive what they
would otherwise receive under the new PPS. Medicare’s payments for FQHCs services will no
longer be subject to reasonableness tests. CBO did not provide a separate score for this
subsection of the provision.
Title VI—Transparency and Program Integrity
Subtitle A—Physician Ownership and Other Transparency
Sec. 6001 as modified by Sec. 10601 of PPACA, and by Sec. 1106 of the Reconciliation Act.
Limitation on Medicare Exception to the Prohibition on Certain Physician Referrals for
Hospitals. Physicians are generally prohibited from referring Medicare patients for certain
services to facilities in which they (or their immediate family members) have financial interests.
However, among other exceptions, physicians are not prohibited from referring patients to whole
hospitals in which they have ownership or investment interests. Providers that furnish
substantially all of their designated health services to individuals residing in rural areas are
exempt as well. Under this provision, beginning no later than 18 months after the date of
enactment, only physician-owned hospitals meeting certain requirements will be exempt from the
prohibition on self-referral. Hospitals that have physician ownership and a provider agreement in
operation on December 31, 2010, and that meet other specified requirements will be exempt from
this self-referral ban. These requirements include a limitation on the expansion of the facilities’
service capacity and address conflicts of interest, bona fide investments, and patient safety issues.
In addition, the hospital could not have converted from an ambulatory surgical center to a hospital
after the date of enactment.
Exempt hospitals meeting those requirements will not be permitted to increase the number of
operating rooms, procedure rooms or beds for which the hospital is licensed as the date of
enactment. A process is to be established to allow certain hospitals to expand by February 1,
2011, as established by regulations promulgated by January 1, 2011. Hospitals can apply for such
an expansion once every two years. The increase will be limited to facilities on the main campus
of the hospital. There will be no administrative or judicial review of this process. The Secretary is
required to establish policies and procedures to ensure compliance with these requirements,
beginning on their effective date, including unannounced site reviews of hospitals. These audits
are to begin no later than May 1, 2012. The CBO score is -$0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$0.5 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6002. Transparency Reports and Reporting of Physician Ownership or Investment
Interests. This provision adds a new section 1128G to the Social Security Act to require covered
drug, device, biological, or medical supply manufacturers that make a payment or another transfer
of value to a physician (other than employees of a manufacturer) or a teaching hospital to report
annually, in electronic form, specified information on such transactions to the Secretary of HHS.
Certain information is to be excluded from these reporting requirements, including payments or
transfers of $10 or less, unless the aggregate annual payments or transfers to a recipient exceeds
$100 (which, after 2012, would be indexed for inflation), samples intended for patient use, patient
Congressional Research Service
71
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
educational materials, and loans of a covered device for a short-term time period. The provision
also requires manufacturers, or group purchasing organizations to report annually to the
Secretary, in electronic form, certain information regarding an ownership or investment interest
held by a physician (or an immediate family member) in the manufacturer or group purchasing
organization during the preceding year. Certain penalties will apply for failure to submit these
reports to the Secretary. The Secretary is also required to establish procedures to ensure public
availability of the information to be submitted under this section. The CBO score is $0.0 billion
for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6003. Disclosure Requirements for In-Office Ancillary Services Exception to the
Prohibition on Physician Self-Referral for Certain Imaging Services. This section amends
section 1877 of the Social Security Act, which prohibits physician referrals, for certain services
that may be paid for by Medicare, to entities with which the physician has a financial relationship.
Specifically, section 6003 amends one of the exceptions to this prohibition, the in-office ancillary
services exception. The provision adds a requirement that with respect to magnetic resonance
imaging, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and any other designated health
services as determined by the Secretary, the referring physician must inform the individual in
writing at the time of the referral that the individual may obtain the services from a person other
than the referring physician, a physician who is a member of the same group practice as the
referring physician, or an individual who is directly supervised by the physician or by another
physician in the group practice. The individual must be provided with a written list of suppliers
who furnish these services in the area in which the individual resides. The CBO score is $0.0
billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6004. Prescription Drug Sample Transparency. The provision adds a new section 1128H
of the Social Security Act to require drug manufacturers and authorized distributors of an
applicable drug to submit annually to the Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services
the identity and quantity of drug samples requested and distributed under section 503 of the
Prescription Drug Marketing Act of 1987 (PDMA, P.L. 100-293). This submission must be
aggregated by the name, address, professional designation, and signature or the practitioner
making the request for the sample (or an individual acting on the practitioner’s behalf), as well as
any other category of information that the Secretary determines is appropriate. An applicable drug
is defined to include drugs that are available by prescription and for which payment is available
under Medicare or a Medicaid state plan (or a waiver of such plan). The CBO score is $0.0 billion
for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6005. Pharmacy Benefit Managers Transparency Requirements. Pharmacy benefit
managers (PBMs) are companies that administer drug benefit programs for employers and health
insurance carriers. Drug manufacturers may provide “rebates” to PBMs for a particular drug in
exchange for the placement of the drug on the PBM’s formulary (it’s list of approved drugs). This
provision requires PBMs that manage prescription drug coverage under a contract with a Part D
drug plan or a qualified health plan offered through an exchange (established by a state under
Section 1311 of PPACA) to share certain financial information with the Secretary of HHS, the
plans the PBMs contract with through Medicare Part D, or the exchanges in a manner, form, and
timeframe specified by the Secretary. Specifically, PBMs are required to disclose information on:
(1) the percentage of all prescriptions that are provided through retail pharmacies compared to
mail order pharmacies, and the generic dispensing rates for each type of pharmacy (for example,
independent, chain, supermarket or mass merchandiser pharmacy) that is paid by the PBM under
contract; (2) the aggregate amount and types of rebates, discounts or price concessions that the
PBM negotiates on behalf of the plan and the aggregate amount of these that are passed through
Congressional Research Service
72
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
to the plan sponsor, and the total number of prescriptions dispensed; and (3) the aggregate amount
of the difference between the amount the plan pays the PBM and the amount that the PBM pays
the retail and mail order pharmacy, and the total number of prescriptions dispensed. This
information is considered confidential and is to be protected by the Secretary. The CBO score is
$0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.63
Subtitle D—Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Sec. 6301. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research as modified by Sec. 10602. The need for
credible information about which clinical strategies work best, under what circumstances and for
whom has been widely recognized by clinicians, patients, researchers and policy makers.
Commonly referred to as comparative effectiveness research (CER), the Institute of Medicine
(IOM) defines this type of research as the “the generation and synthesis of evidence that
compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, monitor a
clinical condition and improve delivery of care” with the aim of tailoring decisions to the needs of
individual patients. CBO has referred to CER as “a comparison of the impact of different options
that are available for treating a given medical condition for a particular set of patients.” MedPAC
has referred to “comparative-effectiveness” as “analysis [that] compares the clinical effectiveness
of a service (drugs, devices, diagnostic and surgical procedures, diagnostic tests, and medical
services) with its alternatives.” The phrase “patient-centered outcomes research” has also been
used as an alternate term.
Most recently, comparative effectiveness research has been addressed in current law by the
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA, P.L. 108-173)
and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA, P.L. 111-5). Section 1013 of
the MMA authorizes the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to conduct and
support research on outcomes, comparative clinical effectiveness, and appropriateness of
pharmaceuticals, devices, and health care services. The section also prohibits the Center for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) from using the data to withhold coverage of a
prescription drug. The ARRA provided $1.1 billion in funds to support the development and
dissemination of CER. ARRA also asked the Institute of Medicine to recommend national
priorities for the research to be addressed by ARRA funds.
This section of the PPACA modifies Title XI of the Social Security Act to add a Part D,
Comparative Clinical Effectiveness Research after sections on General Provisions, Peer Review,
and Administrative Simplification. The provision authorizes the establishment of a private, non-
profit, tax-exempt corporation, which is to be neither an agency nor establishment of the United
States government called the “Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.” This institute is to
enhance the capacity to conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research (CCER). The purpose
of the Institute would be to “assist patients, clinicians, purchasers, and policy makers in making
informed health decisions by advancing the quality and relevance of evidence concerning the
manner in which diseases, disorders, and other health conditions can effectively and appropriately
be prevented, diagnosed, treated, monitored, and managed through research and evidence
synthesis that considers variations in patient sub-populations, and the dissemination of research
63 Subtitle B on nursing home transparency and Subtitle C on background checks are discussed in CRS Report R40943,
Public Health, Workforce, Quality, and Related Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L.
111-148), coordinated by C. Stephen Redhead and Erin D. Williams.
Congressional Research Service
73
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
findings with respect to the relative health outcomes, clinical effectiveness, and appropriateness
of the medical treatments, services, and items.”
The duties of the Institute are to (1) identify research priorities and establish a research agenda,
(2) carry out the research project agenda, (3) collect relevant data from CMS and other sources,
(4) appoint expert advisory panels, (5) support patient and consumer representatives, (6) establish
a methodology committee, (7) provide for a peer-review process for primary research, (8) release
research findings, (9) adopt the national priorities, the research project agenda, the
methodological standards developed and updated by the methodology committee, and any peer-
review process provided under point (7), and (10) submit an annual report to Congress and the
President. The Institute is to give preference to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
and the National Institutes of Health in the awarding of contracts to conduct the research, if the
organizations are so authorized in their governing statutes.
The provision establishes a Board of Governors for the Institute, which would be responsible for
carrying out the duties of the Institute. The Institute’s Board is to consist of the Directors of
AHRQ and the NIH (or their designee) as well as 17 members appointed by the Comptroller
General of the United States representing patients and health care consumers, physicians and
providers, private payers, pharmaceutical, device, and diagnostic manufacturers or developers,
representatives of quality improvement or independent health service researchers, and
representatives of the federal government or the states.
The provision includes a number of limitations on the use of CCER. A rule of construction
specifies that the Institute is not to be permitted to mandate coverage, reimbursement or other
policies for any public or private payer nor to prevent the Secretary from covering the routine
costs of clinical care received by Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP beneficiaries in the case where the
individual is participating in a clinical trial where the costs would be covered by the program. In
addition, the Secretary could only use evidence and findings from CCER to make a Medicare
coverage determination if the process is iterative and transparent and includes public comment
and considers the effect on subpopulations.
CCER is not to be construed as (1) superseding or modifying the coverage of items or services
under Medicare that the Secretary determines are reasonable and necessary, nor (2) authorizing
the Secretary to deny coverage of items or services under Medicare solely on the basis of
comparative clinical effectiveness research. The Secretary is prohibited from using CCER
evidence and findings in determining Medicare coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs
in a manner that treats extending the life of an elderly, disabled, or terminally ill individual as of
lower value than extending the life of an individual who is younger, non-disabled, or not
terminally ill, nor in a manner that would preclude or have the intent to discourage individuals
from choosing health care treatments based on how the individual values the tradeoff between
extending the length of life and the risk of disability. The Institute will also not be allowed to
develop or employ a dollars-per-quality adjusted life year or similar measure that discounts value
of life because of disability as a threshold to establish what type of care is cost effective or
recommended, nor would the Secretary utilize such an adjusted life year (or such a similar
measure) as a threshold to determine coverage, reimbursement, or incentive programs under
Medicare.
The provision creates a new trust fund, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund (the
PCORTF) in the U.S. Treasury to fund the Institute and its activities. Monies will be directed to
this fund from the general fund of the Treasury as well as the Medicare Trust Funds and from fees
Congressional Research Service
74
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
imposed on health insurance and self-insured plans. In years 2010, 2011, and 2012, $10 million,
$50 million, and $150 million will be appropriated from Treasury to the fund.
Beginning in 2013, the PCORTF will also be financed from fees on health insurance and self-
insured health plans. For FY2013, the Secretary will transfer amounts from the Medicare Federal
Hospital Insurance and the Federal Supplemental Medical Trust Funds to the PCORTF in
proportion to total Medicare expenditures that come from each Fund for a given year. In FY2013,
the amount is to be equivalent to $1 multiplied by the average number of individuals entitled to
benefits under Part A or enrolled under Part B of Medicare during the year. (In FY2014 through
FY2019, the amounts are to be equivalent to $2, adjusted for increases in health care spending
FY2014, multiplied by the average number of such individuals for the given year.)
For fiscal years 2014 through 2019, the provision requires a transfer of $150 million from the
Treasury as well as the net revenues from a fee of $1 in FY2013 and $2 (adjusted for health care
spending increases) in FY2014 through FY2019, on each health insurance policy in the United
States multiplied by the number of lives covered under that policy. Insurance policies that
primarily provide non-health benefits will be exempt. This fee will sunset after FY2019 (plan
years ending after September 30, 2019). The CBO score is $0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Subtitle E—Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP Program Integrity Provisions
Sec. 6401 as modified by Sec. 10603 of PPACA, and Sec. 1304 of the Reconciliation Act.
Provider Screening and Other Enrollment Requirements Under Medicare, Medicaid, and
CHIP. CMS has implemented regulations requiring providers and suppliers to complete an
application to enroll in the Medicare program and receive billing privileges. As part of the
enrollment process, providers and suppliers are required to submit information necessary to verify
identity and state licensure. CMS reserves the right to perform on-site inspections of a provider or
supplier to verify compliance with standards. If enrollment requirements are not met, CMS may
revoke Medicare billing privileges. Providers and suppliers must resubmit and recertify the
accuracy of their enrollment information every five years. This provision requires the Secretary to
establish procedures for enrolling providers and suppliers enrolling in the Medicare, Medicaid,
and CHIP programs. The enrollment process is required to include provider screening, enhanced
oversight measures, disclosure requirements, moratoriums on enrollment, and requirements for
developing compliance programs.
Provider Screening. The Secretary, in consultation with the OIG, has six months to develop the
procedures related to provider screening. The Secretary is to determine the level of screening
according to risk and with respect to a category of providers and suppliers. At a minimum, all
providers and suppliers will be subject to licensure checks, including checks across states. The
Secretary has the authority to impose additional screening measures such as criminal background
checks, fingerprinting, unannounced site visits, database checks, and other screening measures as
appropriate. To cover the costs of screening, institutional providers will be subject to fees. Fees
will start at $500 in 2010 and increase by the rate of inflation annually thereafter. The provision
requires the Secretary to use the fees collected to fund program integrity efforts. The Secretary
has the authority to exempt providers from fees in case of hardship. The revised screening
measures will apply to providers and suppliers who have not yet enrolled in Medicare, Medicaid,
and CHIP in one year, to current providers and suppliers in two years, and to providers and
suppliers re-enrolling in one or more of these programs in 6 months. No provider or supplier will
Congressional Research Service
75
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
be allowed to participate in Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP if they have not been screened within
three years.
Enhanced Oversight. The Secretary is required to establish procedures for imposing periods of
enhanced oversight, such as prepayment review and payment caps, on new providers and
suppliers. The period cannot be less than 30 days or last more than one year. Beginning January 1,
2011, in instance when there is a significant risk of fraud, the Secretary will be required to impose
a 90-day period of enhanced oversight on DME suppliers initially enrolling in the program. The
Secretary will also have the authority to impose temporary moratoriums on enrolling new
providers and suppliers if the Secretary determines that these moratoriums are necessary to
combat fraud.
Disclosure Requirements. The provision imposes new disclosure requirements on providers and
suppliers enrolling or re-enrolling in Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP. Applicants will be required to
disclose current or previous affiliations with any provider or supplier that has uncollected debt,
has had their payments suspended, has been excluded from participating in Medicare, Medicaid,
or CHIP, or has had their billing privileges revoked. The Secretary is authorized to adjust
payments or deny enrollment in these programs if these affiliations pose an undue risk to the
program.
Compliance Programs. The provision requires Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP providers and
suppliers, within a particular industry or category, to establish a compliance program. The
requirements for the compliance program are to be developed by the Secretary and the OIG. The
Secretary is required to consider the extent to which compliance programs have been adopted by
providers when creating a timeline for implementation. The CBO score is $0.0 for FY2010-
FY2014 and -$0.1 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6402 as modified by Sec. 1303 of the Reconciliation Act. Enhanced Medicare and
Medicaid Program Integrity Provisions.
Data Matching. Currently, claims and payment data for Medicare and Medicaid are housed in
multiple databases. CMS is in the process of consolidating information stored in these databases
into an Integrated Data Repository (IDR). According to the agency’s website, the eventual goal of
the IDR is to support an integrated data warehouse containing data related to Medicare &
Medicaid claims, beneficiaries, providers, and health plans. The provision requires CMS to
include in the IDR claims and payment data from the following programs: Medicare (Parts A, B,
C, and D), Medicaid, CHIP, health-related programs administered by the Departments of Veterans
Affairs (VA) and Defense (DOD), Social Security, and the Indian Health Service (IHS). The
priority is the integration of Medicare and Medicaid claims and payment data. Data for the
remaining programs is to be integrated as appropriate. The Secretary is required to enter into data
sharing agreements with the federal agencies listed above for the purposes of identifying fraud,
waste, and abuse. This provision also grants the OIG and the DOJ explicit access to Medicare,
Medicaid, and CHIP payment and claims data (including Medicare Part D data) for the purposes
of conducting law enforcement and oversight activities.
Access to Data. Inspectors General have substantial independence and powers to carry out their
mandate to combat waste, fraud, and abuse, including relatively unlimited authority to access all
records and information of an agency. This provision grants the OIG the authority, under
Medicare and Medicaid, to obtain information from any individual (including a beneficiary) or
entity (i.e., provider, supplier, contractor, subcontractor, etc.) that directly or indirectly provides
Congressional Research Service
76
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
medical services payable by a Federal health care program. Types of information include any
supporting documentation necessary to validate a claim for payment such as medical records for
individuals prescribed Medicare Part B or Part D drugs. PPACA includes a separate clause
mandating that the HHS OIG, the DOJ, and the GAO have access to Medicare Part D data for the
purposes of carrying out health oversight activities.
Beneficiary Participation in Health Care Fraud Scheme. The provision requires the Secretary to
impose penalties against beneficiaries entitled to or enrolled in Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP who
knowingly participate in a health care fraud offense.
Overpayments. In accordance with CMS instructions, overpayments must be repaid to CMS
within 30 days of receiving a demand letter. If the debt is not paid in full after 30 days, interest is
assessed and CMS reserves the right to collect the overpayment by offset. Under this provision,
individuals will be required to report and return an overpayment within 60 days. Overpayments
reported after this date will be considered an obligation as defined in Title 31 of the USC.
National Provider Identifier. Health care providers often have many different provider numbers,
one for billing each private insurance plan or public health care program. The administrative
simplification provisions of HIPAA required the adoption and use of a standard unique identifier
for health care providers or National Provider Identifier (NPI). All health care providers who are
considered covered entities under HIPAA were required to obtain and submit claims using an NPI
as of May 2007. This provision requires the Secretary to issue a regulation by January 1, 2011,
mandating that all Medicare and Medicaid providers include their NPI on all claims and
enrollment applications.
Permissive Exclusions. HHS OIG has the authority to exclude health care providers from
participation in federal health care programs. Exclusions are mandatory under certain
circumstances, and permissive in others (i.e., HHS OIG has discretion in whether to exclude an
entity or individual). This provision subjects any individual or entity that makes a false statement
or misrepresentation on an application to enroll or participate in a federal health care program to
the OIG’s permissive exclusion authority. The provision explicitly applies to MA plans, Medicare
prescription drug plans (PDPs), and Medicaid managed care plans as well as their participating
providers and suppliers.
Civil Monetary Penalties (CMPs). Section 1128A (a) of the SSA authorizes the imposition of
CMPs on a person, organization, agency, or other entity that engages in various types of improper
conduct with respect to federal health care programs. This section generally provides for CMPs of
up to $10,000 for each false claim submitted, $15,000 or $50,000 under other circumstances, and
an assessment of up to three times the amount claimed. This provision adds additional actions that
are subject to CMPs. Specifically, individuals who have been excluded from a Federal health care
program who order or prescribe an item or service; individuals who make false statements on
enrollment applications, bids, or contracts to participate in a federal health care program; or
persons who know of an overpayment and do not return the overpayment may be subject to a
CMPs of $50,000.
Kickbacks and Revising the Intent Requirement. Under the federal anti-kickback statute, SSA
Section 1128B(b), it is a felony for a person to knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit, or
receive anything of value (i.e., “remuneration”), in return for a referral or to induce generation of
business reimbursable under a federal health care program. Violations of section 1128B carry
penalties of up to $25,000, imprisonment of five years, or both.
Congressional Research Service
77
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
The federal False Claims Act (FCA)64 is considered by many to be an important tool for
combating fraud against the U.S. government. In general, the FCA imposes civil liability on
persons who knowingly submit a false or fraudulent claim or engage in various improper
activities involving federal government money or property. Penalties under the FCA include
treble damages, plus an additional penalty of $5,500 to $11,000 for each false claim filed.
Section 6402(f)(1) of PPACA amends section 1128B to provide that a claim for items or services
resulting from a violation of section 1128B will also constitute a false or fraudulent claim that
may be subject to penalties under the FCA. Further, section 6402(f)(2) of PPACA addresses the
intent requirements of section 1128B. This section amends section 1128B to specify that with
respect to violations of the section, a person does not have to have actual knowledge of section
1128B, or specific intent to commit a violation of it.
Treatment of Certain Charitable and Other Innocuous Programs. Under Section 1128A of the
SSA, the HHS OIG is authorized to impose CMPs and assessments on a person, including an
organization, agency, or other entity, who engages in various types of improper conduct with
respect to federal health care programs.65 One type of prohibited conduct, described in section
1128A(a)(5), occurs when a person offers or transfers remuneration to a Medicare or Medicaid
beneficiary when such person knows or should know the remuneration is likely to influence the
beneficiary’s ordering or receiving items or services (payable, at least in part, by Medicare or
Medicaid) from a particular provider, practitioner, or supplier. Further, individuals who commit
violations of the federal anti-kickback statute,66 Section 1128B(b), may be subject to CMPs under
section 1128A for damages amounting to not more than three times the total amount of
remuneration offered, paid, solicited, or received, without regard to whether a portion of such
remuneration was offered, paid, solicited, or received for a lawful purpose.
Section 6402(d)(2)(B) of PPACA amends the definition of “remuneration” in section 1128A(i)(6)
of the SSA to exclude remuneration that promotes access to care and poses a low risk of harm to
patients and federal health care programs; the offer or transfer of items or services for free or less
than fair market value by a person, subject to certain additional requirements; and, effective on a
date specified by the Secretary (but no earlier than January 1, 2011), a waiver of the copayment
amount (under prescription drug plan offered by a PDP sponsor or an MA-PD plan offered by an
MA organization) for the first fill of a covered part D drug that is a generic drug for individuals
enrolled in a the prescription drug plan or a MA-PD drug plan.
Testimonial Subpoena Authority. The testimonial subpoena authority grants the authority to issue
subpoenas and require the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of any other
evidence that relates to matters under investigation or in question. Under this provision, the
Secretary is given the authority to issue subpoenas and require the attendance and testimony of
witnesses and the production of any other evidence that relates to matters under investigation or
in question by the Secretary. The Secretary also has the ability to delegate this authority to the
OIG and the Administrator of CMS for the purposes of a program exclusion investigation.
Surety Bonds. To be eligible to receive a provider number from CMS and bill Medicare, DME
suppliers are required to provide the Secretary with a surety bond in the amount of $50,000 or
64 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-3733.
65 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a.
66 See discussion under the section “Health Care Fraud” for a description of the federal anti-kickback statute.
Congressional Research Service
78
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
greater. A surety bond issued by a State would satisfy this requirement. The Secretary has the
authority to impose these requirements on other Part A and B providers and suppliers, except
physicians. Home health agencies are required to provide the Secretary with a surety bond equal
to 10% of the aggregate Medicare and Medicaid payments made to the agency for that year or
$50,000, whichever is smaller. A surety bond for a home health agency is effective for four years,
with limited exceptions. This provision gives the Secretary the authority to require certain
providers and suppliers to provide surety bonds commensurate with the volume of billing. The
value of the bond, however, cannot be less than $50,000. The Secretary also has the authority to
impose this requirement on other providers and suppliers considered to be at risk by the Secretary.
Payment Suspensions. Under CMS regulations, CMS and its contractors have the authority to
withhold payment in whole or in part if there is reliable evidence of an overpayment or fraud.
CMS regulations stipulate the procedures CMS and its contractors must follow when deciding to
suspend payment. This provision provides the Secretary with explicit statutory authority to
suspend payments to providers and suppliers pending an investigation of fraud, unless the
Secretary determines that there is good cause not to suspend payments. The provision also
requires the Secretary to consult with the OIG to determine whether there is a credible allegation
of fraud and requires the Secretary to implement this provision through rulemaking.
Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control (HCFAC) Account. Activities to fight health care fraud,
waste, and abuse are funded by the Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control (HCFAC) account. The
HCFAC account funds two programs: (1) the HCFAC program, which finances the investigative
and enforcement activities undertaken by HHS, the OIG, the DOJ, and the FBI, and (2) the
Medicare Integrity Program (MIP), which finances the program integrity activities undertaken by
CMS contractors. HCFAC was established by HIPAA, which sought to increase and stabilize
Federal funding for health care anti-fraud activities. HIPAA appropriated funds to the HCFAC
account for years 1997 through 2003. In December 2006, Congress passed the Tax Relief and
Health Care Act, or TRHCA, which extended the mandatory annual appropriation for the HCFAC
program by a CPI adjustment until 2010. TRHCA did not extend the annual appropriation for
MIP. This provision appropriates an additional $10 million annually to the HCFAC program for
fiscal years 2011 through 2020. Funds are to be appropriated in the same proportion as allocated
in FY2010 and are to be available until expended. The provision also permanently applies the CPI
adjustment mandated under TRHCA to the HCFAC program and adds a CPI-adjustment to the
MIP program beginning in 2011. Sec. 1303 of the Reconciliation Act appropriates additional
funding to the HCFAC program for fiscal years 2011 through 2016: (1) $95 million for FY2011;
(2) $55 million for FY2012; (3) $30 million for FY2013 and FY2014; and $20 million for
FY2015 and FY2016. Funding is to be available without further appropriation until expended.
Medicare and Medicaid Integrity Programs. Under the Medicare Integrity Program (MIP), CMS
contracts with private entities to conduct a variety of activities designed to protect Medicare from
fraud, waste, and abuse. Activities include auditing providers, identifying and recovering
improper payments, educating providers about fraudulent providers, and instituting a Medicare-
Medicaid data matching program. This provision requires MIP contractors to provide the
Secretary and the OIG with performance statistics, including the number and amount of
overpayments recovered, the number of fraud referrals, and the return on investment for such
activities as requested by the Secretary or the OIG. The Secretary is also required to conduct
evaluations of eligible entities at least every three years and, beginning in FY2011, submit a
report to Congress describing the use and effectiveness of MIP funds. The reports will be due
6 months after the end of each fiscal year. The CBO score is -$1.1 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$2.9 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Congressional Research Service
79
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Sec. 10330. Modernizing Computer and Data Systems of CMS to Support Improvements in
Care Delivery. The provision requires the Secretary to develop a plan along with a budget to
modernize the computer and data systems of CMS. In developing the plan, the Secretary is
required to consider how such a system could make data available in a timely and reliable manner
to providers and suppliers to support their efforts to better manage and coordinate care, and
support consistent evaluations of payment and delivery system reforms. The Secretary is required
to post the plan on the CMS website within 9 months from the date this legislation is enacted. The
CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6403. Elimination of Duplication Between the Healthcare Integrity and Protection Data
Bank (HIPDB) and the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB). The HIPAA of 1996
required the Secretary to develop and maintain a national health care fraud and abuse data
collection program for the reporting of adverse actions taken against health care providers. This
database is called the Healthcare Integrity and Protection Data Bank (HIPDB). The statute
requires the following types of health care related adverse actions be reported to the HIPDB -
civil judgments, federal or state criminal convictions, actions taken by federal or state licensing
agencies, and provider exclusions from Medicare and Medicaid. Only final adverse actions are
reportable to the HIPDB. Administrative fines, citations, corrective action plans, and other
personnel actions are not reportable except under certain circumstances. Settlements, in which a
finding of liability has not been established, are also not reportable. Both federal and state
government agencies as well as health plans are required to report to the HIPDB. Prior to the
HIPDB, Congress established the National Practitioner Data Bank or NPDB with the Health Care
Quality Improvement Act of 1986. The NPDB collects data related to the professional
competence of physicians, dentists, and other health care practitioners. The types of information
included in the NPDB are medical malpractice payments, certain adverse licensure actions,
adverse privilege actions, adverse professional society actions, and exclusions from Medicare and
Medicaid. Section 1921 of the SSA expanded the scope of reporting requirements for the NPDB
to encompass additional adverse licensure actions and actions taken by State licensing and
certification agencies, peer review organizations, and private accreditation organizations. States
are required to have a system for reporting adverse actions to the NPDB.
This provision requires the Secretary to maintain a national health care fraud and abuse data
collection program for the reporting of certain final adverse actions (excluding settlements in
which no findings of liability have been made) taken against health care providers and furnish
such information to the NPDB. Information collected in the NPDB is to be available to the
agencies and authorities listed under section 1921(b). The Secretary has the authority to establish
fees for the disclosure of such information. The provision requires States to have a system for
reporting information with respect to any final adverse action taken against a health care provider,
supplier, or practitioner. The Secretary is also required to implement a transition process, which
must be completed within one year, for transferring all information collected in the HIPDB to the
NPDB, thereby eliminating the HIPDB. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
$0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6404. Maximum Period of Submission of Medicare Claims Reduced to Not More Than
12 Months. Prior Medicare statute required that payments only be made if a written request for
payment is filed within three calendar years after the year in which the services were provided.
The Secretary is authorized to reduce this period to no less than one year if it deems it necessary
for the efficient administration of the program. As established by CMS regulations, the time limit
on submitting a claim for payment is the close of the calendar year after the year in which the
services were furnished. This provision requires that beginning January 2010, the maximum
Congressional Research Service
80
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
period for submission of Medicare claims be reduced to not more than 12 months. The CBO score
is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6405 as modified by Sec. 10604. Physicians Who Order Items and Services Required to
be Medicare Enrolled Physicians or Eligible Professionals. In order to receive payment from
Medicare, physicians are required to certify that specified services (i.e., inpatient psychiatric
services, post-hospital extended care services, and home health services) meet certain conditions.
In the case of home health services, physicians are required to certify that such services were
required because the individual was confined to his home and needs skilled nursing care or
physical, speech, or occupational therapy; a plan for furnishing services to the individual has been
established; and such services were provided under the care of a physician. In the case of DME,
the Secretary is authorized to require, for specified covered items, that payment be made for items
and services only if a physician has communicated to the supplier a written order for the item.
This provision requires that for written orders and certifications made on or after July 1, 2010,
physicians or eligible professionals who order DME or HH services be enrolled in the Medicare
program. The Secretary is given the authority to extend these requirements to physicians and
eligible professionals that order other categories of Medicare items and services, including
covered Part D drugs, if the Secretary determines that it would help reduce fraud, waste, and
abuse. The CBO score is -$0.2 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$0.4 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6406. Requirement for Physicians to Provide Documentation on Referrals to Programs
at High Risk of Waste and Abuse. OIG has “permissive” authority to exclude an entity or an
individual from a federal health program under numerous circumstances, including failing to
supply documentation related to payment for items and services. Under this provision, beginning
January 1, 2010, the Secretary has the authority to disenroll, for no more than one year, a
Medicare enrolled physician or supplier that fails to maintain and provide access to written orders
or requests for payment for DME, certification for home health services, or referrals for other
items and services to the Secretary. The provision also extends the OIG’s permissive exclusion
authority to include individuals or entities that order, refer, or certify the need for health care
services that fail to provide adequate documentation to the Secretary to verify payment. The CBO
score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6407 as modified by Sec. 10605. Face-to-Face Encounter with Patient Required Before
Physicians May Certify Eligibility for Home Health Services or Durable Medical
Equipment Under Medicare. Home health services are covered under Medicare Parts A and B.
In order to receive payment from Medicare, physicians are required to certify and re-certify that
specified services (i.e., inpatient psychiatric services, post-hospital extended care services, and
home health services) meet certain conditions. In the case of home health services, physicians are
required to certify that such services were required because the individual was confined to his
home and needs skilled nursing care or physical, speech, or occupational therapy; a plan for
furnishing services to the individual has been established; and such services were provided under
the care of a physician. In the case of DME, the Secretary is authorized to require, for specified
covered items, that payment be made for items and services only if a physician has communicated
to the supplier a written order for the item. Under this provision, beginning January 1, 2010,
physicians are required to have a face-to-face encounter (including through telehealth) with the
individual prior to issuing a certification or re-certification for home health services or DME.
Physicians furnishing home health services under Part A are required to document that they had a
face-to-face encounter with the patient within a reasonable time frame. Physicians furnishing
home health services under Part B are required to document that they had a face-to-face
encounter within the six-month period preceding the certification. In the case of DME, physicians
Congressional Research Service
81
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
are required to document that a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse
specialist have a face-to-face encounter during the six-month period preceding the certification.
The Secretary is authorized to apply the face-to-face encounter requirement to other Medicare
items and services based upon a finding that doing so would reduce the risk of waste, fraud, and
abuse. The provision also specifies that eligible professionals include nurse practitioners or
clinical nurse specialists who are collaborating with the physician, a certified nurse midwife, or
physician assistant as defined in statute. The CBO score is -$0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$1.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6408. Enhanced Penalties. Section 1128A (a) of the SSA authorizes the imposition of
CMPs on a person, organization, agency, or other entity that engages in various types of improper
conduct with respect to federal health care programs, and generally provides for CMPs of up to
$10,000 for each false claim submitted, $15,000 or $50,000 under other circumstances, and an
assessment of up to three times the amount claimed. This provision of PPACA mandates that
persons who knowingly make, use, or cause to be made or used any false statement material to a
fraudulent claim be subject to a civil monetary penalty of $50,000 for each violation. This
provision also adds a new clause to the CMP statute—persons who fail to grant timely access,
upon reasonable request (as defined by the Secretary in regulations), to the OIG, for the purpose
of audits, investigations, evaluations, or other statutory functions of the OIG, will be subject to
CMPs of $15,000 for each day of failure.
Penalties for MA and Part D plans. MA plans enter into contracts with the Secretary to
participate in the Medicare program. The Secretary has the authority to impose sanctions and
CMPs on MA plans that violate the terms of the contract. Among the types of violations are
failing to provide medically necessary care, imposing excess beneficiary premiums, expelling or
refusing to re-enroll beneficiaries, and misrepresenting or falsifying information. This provision
increases the number of violations subject to sanctions and CMPs by the Secretary. Under the
provision, plans that enroll individuals in a MA or Part D plan without their consent (except
Part D dual eligibles), transfer an individual from one plan to another for the purpose of earning a
commission, fail to comply with marketing requirements, or employ or contract with an
individual or entity that violates the terms of the contract will be subject to sanctions imposed by
the Secretary. The provision also enhances penalties for plans that misrepresent or falsify
information furnished to the Secretary or to an individual by an additional assessment equal to the
amount claimed by the plan based on the false information.
These new penalties apply to acts committed on or after January 1, 2010. The CBO score is $0.0
billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6409. Medicare Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol. In 1998, the HHS Office of the
Inspector General (HHS OIG) issued a Self-Disclosure Protocol (SDP), which includes a process
under which a health care provider can voluntarily self-disclose evidence of potential fraud, in an
effort, to avoid the costs or disruptions that may be associated with an investigation or litigation.
On March 24, 2009, HHS OIG issued an “Open Letter to Health Care Providers” that makes
refinements to the SDP. In the Open Letter, HHS OIG announced that it would no longer accept
disclosure of a matter that involves only liability under the physician self-referral law in “the
absence of a colorable anti-kickback statute violation.” Further, for anti-kickback-related
submissions accepted into the SDP following the date of the letter, HHS OIG requires a minimum
$50,000 settlement amount to resolve the matter. This provision requires that the Secretary, in
cooperation with the OIG, establish a self-referral disclosure protocol (SRDP) to enable health
care providers and suppliers to disclose actual or potential violations of the physician self-referral
Congressional Research Service
82
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
law. In addition, the Secretary will be required to post information on CMS’ website to inform
stakeholders of how to disclose actual or potential SRDP violations. The CBO score is $0.0
billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6410. Adjustments to the Medicare Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics,
and Supplies Competitive Acquisition Program. Medicare generally pays for most durable
medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies (DMEPOS) on the basis of a fee schedule.
MMA required the Secretary to establish a Competitive Acquisition Program for specified
medical equipment in specified areas to replace the Medicare fee schedule. The program is to be
phased-in, starting in nine of the largest metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in 2009 (round 1),
expanding to an additional 70 of the largest MSAs in 2011 (round 2) and remaining areas after
2011. PPACA expands the number of areas included in round 2 of the program from 70 to 91
MSAs. The 21 additional MSAs will be the next largest MSAs by population. The Secretary is
required to extend the program, or apply competitively bid rates, to remaining areas by 2016. The
CBO score is -$0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and -$1.4 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 6411. Expansion of the Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Program. Recovery Audit
Contractors, or RACs, are private organizations that contract with CMS to identify and collect
improper payments made in Medicare Parts A and B. Congress originally required the Secretary
to conduct a three-year demonstration program using RACs in the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA, P.L. 108-173). In December 2006,
Congress passed the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 (TRHCA, P.L. 109-432), which
made the program permanent and mandated the expansion of RACs nationwide by January 1,
2010. Medicare pays RACs differently than it pays other administrative contractors. Historically,
Medicare’s administrative contractors have been paid a fixed annual budget for a defined scope of
work. In contrast, Congress mandated that CMS pay RACs using contingency fees. A
contingency fee is a negotiated payment, typically a percentage, for every overpayment
recovered. This provision requires that the Secretary enter into contracts with RACs for Medicare
Part C and D activities by December 31, 2010. Among the requirements for Part C and D RACs
are ensuring that each MA or PDP plan have in place an anti-fraud plan, reviewing the
reinsurance payments of Part D plans, and comparing Part D plan’s enrollment estimates for high
cost beneficiaries. The CBO score is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for
FY2010-FY2019.67
Sec. 10606. Health Care Fraud Enforcement. This section contains a variety of requirements
related to health care fraud enforcement. Among these provisions, the U.S. Sentencing
Commission will now be required to review and amend the federal sentencing guidelines and
policy statements applicable to persons convicted of federal health care offenses, as specified by
the legislation. In addition, PPACA deems existing certain criminal offenses to be “federal health
care fraud offenses” under the U.S. Criminal Code.68 By defining a particular offense as a
“federal health care offense,” convictions for violations of these listed statutes may be punishable
by longer prison terms and/or higher fines, and other enforcement mechanisms may apply.69 The
new federal health care offenses include the federal anti-kickback statute under section 1128B of
67 Provisions in Subtitle F regarding Medicaid program integrity are discussed in CRS Report R41210, Medicaid and
the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Provisions in PPACA, coordinated by Julie Stone.
68 18 U.S.C. § 24.
69 For example, under 18 U.S.C. §1345, the Attorney General may seek injunctive relief and freeze assets for persons
committing or about to commit a “federal health care offense.”
Congressional Research Service
83
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b), section 1349 of the U.S. Criminal Code
(attempting or conspiring to commit a criminal offense), section 301 of the Federal Food Drug
and Cosmetic Act, and section 501 of ERISA.
This section also amends certain subpoena authority relating to health care. For example, this
section amends the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA, 42 U.S.C. §1997 et
seq.), which provides authority for the Department of Justice (DOJ) to initiate or intervene in
lawsuits in federal courts in order to protect the rights of institutionalized persons. Under CRIPA,
the Attorney General, or a person at his or her direction, could require access by subpoena to any
institution that is the subject of an investigation under CRIPA and to additional information
relating to any institution that is the subject of an investigation under the Act. The information
obtained under a subpoena may not be used for any purpose other than to protect the
constitutional and legal rights, privileges, or immunities of persons who reside or will reside in an
institution, and the DOJ could not transmit this information for any other purpose. The CBO score
is $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and $0.0 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Sec. 1301 of the Reconciliation Act. Community Mental Health Centers. Under current law,
community mental health centers (CMHCs) must meet certain requirements in order to receive
payment under Medicare. For example, CMHCs must demonstrate that they can provide the core
mental health services described in the Public Health Service Act and that they are licensed in the
state in which they are operating. Section 1301 of the Reconciliation Act requires that a CMHC
also demonstrate that they provide at least 40% of their services to individuals not eligible for
Medicare. Section 1301 also restricts Medicare reimbursement for mental health services
delivered in an individual’s home or in an inpatient or residential setting.
Sec. 1302 of the Reconciliation Act. Medicare Prepayment Medical Review Limitations. To
protect the Medicare program from improper payments and fraudulent billing, Medicare
contractors have the authority to review a provider’s claims prior to payment. This is referred to
as prepayment medical review. Under Medicare statute, contractors can only conduct prepayment
review of a provider’s claims only under certain circumstances: (1) to develop a claims payment
error rate and (2) when there is a likelihood of a sustained or high level of improper billing.
Section 1302 of the Reconciliation Act repeals these statutory limitations on prepayment review.
The combined CBO score for1301, 1302, and 130370 is -$0.3 billion for FY2010-FY2014 and
-$0.9 billion for FY2010-FY2019.
Title IX—Revenue Provisions
Subtitle A—Revenue Offset Provisions
Sec. 9015 as modified by Sec. 10906 of PPACA, and Sec. 1402 of the Reconciliation Act.
Additional Hospital Insurance Tax on High-Income Taxpayers and Unearned Income
Medicare Contribution. Under current law, employees and employers each pay a payroll tax of
1.45% to finance Medicare Part A. PPACA imposes an additional tax of 0.9% on high-income
70 The March 20, 2010, CBO score does not include changes made by the Manager’s amendment to the Reconciliation
Act. The prior Section 1303 was deleted and 1304 (as scored by CBO) was renumbered as 1303 in the Reconciliation
Act as enacted.
Congressional Research Service
84
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
workers with wages over $200,000 for single filers and $250,000 for joint filers effective for
taxable years after December 31, 2012. Since employers cannot be expected to know the wages
of a spouse, they will be directed to collect these revenues from all workers with wages exceeding
$200,000 and then the individuals would have to reconcile any excess withholding on their tax
return. The 0.9% tax will also be levied on the self-employed if their incomes exceed the
specified thresholds. The self-employed will not be allowed to deduct this additional tax as a
business expense.
The Reconciliation Act imposes an additional tax on net investment income, defined as interest,
dividends, annuities, royalties, rents and taxable net capital gains. It excludes distributions from a
qualified annuity from a pension plan.71 Households with modified adjusted gross income under
these thresholds will not be subject to the investment income tax. Specifically, effective for
taxable years after December 31, 2012, the Reconciliation Act will a tax equal to 3.8% of the
lesser of
• net investment income for such taxable year, or
• the excess of modified adjusted gross income (MAGI)72 over $250,000 for joint
filers ($125,000 for married filing separately and $200,000 for all other returns).
This tax is also applicable to income from estates and trusts. The active income from trade for
self-employed and S-corporations will not be subject to the tax.73 For these entities, the tax will
apply only to passive income and trade income related to commodity trading. There is also a
special provision for the application of the tax to S. Corporations which sell their businesses. JCT
estimates that this provision will increase revenues by $38.3 billion during FY2010-FY2014 and
$210.2 billion during FY2010-FY2019.
71 As defined in the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Sec. 401(a), 403(a), 403(b), 408, 408A, or 457(b).
72 Modified adjusted gross income is defined as adjusted gross income increased by the excess of foreign earned
income (defined in IRC Sec. 911(a)(1)) over the amount of any deductions or exclusions disallowed under IRC Sec.
911(d)(6) when determining foreign earned income.
73 Corporations may elect S-corporation status if they meet a number of Internal Revenue Code requirements. Among
other things, they cannot have more than 100 shareholders or more than one class of stock. S-corporations are tax-
reporting rather than tax-paying entities, in contrast to C-corporations, which are subject to the corporate income tax.
Congressional Research Service
85
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Appendix B. Timeline for Update Reductions Including Productivity
Adjustments, by Provider Type
Table B-1. Timeline for Update Reductions Including Productivity Adjustments, by Provider
Productivity
Provider
Adjustment CY2009 CY2010 CY2011 CY2012 CY2013 CY2014 CY2015 CY2016 CY2017 CY2018
Acute care
October 1,
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.75
0.75
0.75
hospitals
2011
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
Sec. 3401(a)
points starting points
point
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
of PPACA.
October 1,
starting
reduction in October 1,
October 1,
October 1, October 1,
October 1,
October 1,
October 1,
2009. Sec.
October 1,
October 1,
2012.
2013.
2014.
2015.
2016.
2017.
2018.
3401(a)
2010.
2011.
Sec.10319(a) Sec. 1105(a)
Sec
Sec. 1105(a)
Sec. 1105(a)
Sec. 1105(a)
Sec. 1105(a)
(effective
Sec. 3401(a) Sec.10319(a) of PPACA.
of the
1105(a) of
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
April 1, 2010) of PPACA.
of PPACA.
Reconciliation HCERA.
Sec. 3401(p)
Act.
of PPACA.
Hospital
January 1,
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.75
0.75
outpatient
2012.
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
departments
Sec. 3401(i)
points
point
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
of PPACA.
starting
reduction in January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
2012
2013.
2014
2015.
2016.
2017.
2018,a and
2010
2011
Sec.
Sec. 10319(g) Sec.
Sec. 1105(e)
Sec. 1105(e)
Se.c 1105(e)
January 1,
Sec. 3401(i)
Sec. 3401(i)
10319(g) of
of PPACA.
1105(e) of
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
2019
of PPACA.
of PPACA.
PPACA.
HCERA.
Sec. 1105(e)
of HCERA.
Inpatient
July 1, 2012.
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.75
0.75
psychiatric
Sec. 3401(f)
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
facilities
of PPACA.
points
point
points in July points in July,
points in
points in July
points in July
points in July
points in July
starting July reduction in 1, 2012
1, 2013
July 1,
1, 2015
1, 2016
1, 2017
1, 2018,b and
1, 2010.
July 1, 2011
Sec.10319(e) Sec 1105(d)
2014.
Sec. 1105(d)
Sec. 1105(d)
Sec. 1105(d)
July 1, 2019
Sec. 3401(f)
Sec.10319(e) of PPACA.
of HCERA.
Sec.
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
Sec. 1105(d)
of PPACA
of PPACA.
2 point
1105(d) of
of HCERA.
reduction for
HCERA.
no quality
data starting
July 1, 2013
Sec. 10322 of
PPACA.
CRS-86
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Productivity
Provider
Adjustment
CY2009 CY2010 CY2011 CY2012 CY2013 CY2014 CY2015 CY2016 CY2017 CY2018
Inpatient
October 1,
0.25
0.25
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.75
0.75
0.75
rehabilitation
2011.
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
facilities
Sec. 3401(d)
points starting points
point
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
of PPACA.
October 1,
starting
reduction in October 1,
October 1,
October 1, October 1,
October 1,
October 1,
October 1,
2009. Sec.
October 1,
October 1,
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
3401(d)
2010
2011
Sec.10319(c) Sec. 1105(c)
Sec.1105(c) Sec. 1105(c)
Sec. 1105(c)
Sec. 1105(c)
Sec. 1105(c)
(effective
Sec. 3401(d) Sec.10319(c) of PPACA.
of HCERA.
of HCERA. of HCERA.
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
April 1, 2010) of PPACA.
of PPACA.
Sec. 3401(p)
of PPACA.
Home health
January 1,
1.0
1.0
1.0
agencies
2015.
percentage
percentage
percentage
Sec. 3401(e)
point
point
point
of PPACA.
reduction in reduction in
reduction in
January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
2011
2012
2013
Sec. 3401(e) Sec. 3401(e) Sec.10319(d)
of PPACA.
of PPACA.
of PPACA.
Skilled
October 1,
nursing
2011. Sec.
homes
3401(b) of
PPACA.
Long term
October 1,
0.25
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.75
0.75
0.75
care hospitals 2011. Sec.
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
3401(c) of
points starting points
point
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
PPACA.
October 1,
starting
reduction in October 1,
October 1,
October 1, October 1,
October 1,
October 1,
October 1,
2009.
October 1,
October 1,
2012
2013
2014
2015.
2016.
2017.
2018.
Sec. 3401(c)
2010
2011
Sec.
Sec. 1105(b)
Sec
Sec. 1105(b)
Sec. 1105(b)
Sec. 1105(b)
Sec. 1105(b)
(effective
Sec.
Sec.
10319(b) of
of HCERA.
1105(b) of
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
of HCERA.
April 1, 2010). 10319(b) of
10319(b) of
PPACA.
HCERA.
Sec. 3401(p)
PPACA.
PPACA.
of PPACA.
Hospice October
1,
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
2012. Sec.
percentage
percentage
percentage percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage
3401(g) of
points [from points [from
points
points [from
points [from
points [from
points [from
PPACA.
0.5 by Sec.
0.5 by Sec.
[from 0.5
0.5 by Sec.
0.5 by Sec.
0.5 by Sec.
0.5 by Sec.
10319(f)] in
10319(f)] in
by Sec.
10319(f)] in
10319(f)] in
10319(f)] in
10319(f)] in
October 1,
October 1,
10319(f)]
October 1,
October 1,
October 1,
October 1,
2012
2013 subject
in October 2015 subject
2016 subject
2017 subject
2018 subject
CRS-87
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Productivity
Provider
Adjustment
CY2009 CY2010 CY2011 CY2012 CY2013 CY2014 CY2015 CY2016 CY2017 CY2018
Sec. 3401(g) to a change in 1, 2014
to a change
to a change
to a change
to a change
of PPACA.
the number of subject to
in the
in the
in the
in the
insured above a change
number of
number of
number of
number of
a 5%
in the
insured above insured above insured above insured above
threshold.
number of
a 5%
a 5%
a 5%
a 5%
Sec. 3401(g)
insured
threshold.
threshold.
threshold.
threshold.
of PPACA.
above a 5% Sec. 3401(g)
Sec. 3401(g)
Sec. 3401(g)
Sec. 3401(g)
threshold.
of PPACA.
of PPACA.
of PPACA.
of PPACA.
Sec.
3401(g) of
PPACA.
Clinical
January 1,
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
laboratory
2011
percentage
percentage
percentage
percentage percentage
services
(Replaces
points in
points in
points in
points in
points in
existing
January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
January 1,
reduction of
2011.
2012.
2013.
2014.
2015.
0.5% in
Sec. 3401(l)
Sec. 3401(l) Sec. 3401(l)
Sec.
Sec. 3401(l)
CY2011-
of PPACA.
of PPACA.
of PPACA.
3401(l) of
of PPACA.
CY2013)
PPACA.
Sec. 3401(l)
of PPACA.
Dialysis
January 1,
2012.
(Replaces
existing
reduction of
1.0
percentage
point)
Sec. 3401(h)
of PPACA.
Ambulance
January 1,
services
2011.
Sec. 3401(j)
of PPACA
ASCs January
1,
2011.
Sec. 3401(k)
of PPACA.
CRS-88
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Productivity
Provider
Adjustment
CY2009 CY2010 CY2011 CY2012 CY2013 CY2014 CY2015 CY2016 CY2017 CY2018
Al other Part January 1,
B providers
2011.
Sec. 3401(o)
of PPACA.
a. The hospital outpatient department payment update will also be reduced 0.75 percentage points starting January 1, 2019.
b. The inpatient psychiatric facility payment update will also be reduced 0.75 percentage points starting July 1, 2019
CRS-89
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Appendix C. Implementation Timeline of Medicare
Provisions in PPACA
Table C-1 through Table C-12 list the start date, effective date, or deadline for the Medicare
changes established by PPACA (P.L. 111-148, as amended by P.L. 111-152) in chronological
order. Where applicable, the frequency, duration, and end date associated with specific changes or
requirements are noted in a separate column. Provisions that had non-specific implementation
requirements or deadlines are presented separately in Table C-13. For additional information on
provisions that appear in the timeline, refer to the more detailed summaries in Appendix A.74 For
definitions of acronyms used in the timeline, refer to Appendix D.
74 For ease of reference to related provision titles in Appendix A, the section numbers of PPACA Title X or
Reconciliation Act provisions that modify a PPACA (Title I through IX) provision are included in each line item
associated with that PPACA provision, even though that particular implementation date may not be specifically
affected by the Title X or Reconciliation Act changes.
Congressional Research Service
90
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Table C-1. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—Prior to 2010
Prior to 2010
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3128
Technical Correction Related
Establishes Medicare payments for qualifying ambulance
1/1/2004
to Critical Access Hospital
services provided by a CAH or by an entity owned and
Services.
operated by a CAH at 101% of reasonable costs rather
than 100%.
3137(a)
10317
Hospital Wage Index
Extends Section 508 Classifications (for hospitals unable
10/1/2009 9/30/2010
Improvement.
to otherwise qualify for administrative reclassification to
areas with higher wage index values) through 9/30/2010.
6301 10602
Patient-Centered
Outcomes
$10 million transferred from Treasury to PCORTF for
10/1/2009 9/30/2010
Research.
FY2010.
Table C-2. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2010
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
2902
Elimination of Sunset For
Requires Medicare Part B reimbursements for items and
1/1/2010 Al
Reimbursement for Al Medicare
services furnished in, or at the direction of, facilities operated
subsequent
Part B Services Furnished By
by the Indian Health Service, an Indian tribe or an Indian tribal
years.
Certain Indian Hospitals and
organization. Authority for these reimbursements had expired
Clinics.
on January 1, 2010.
3002
10327
Improvements to the Physician
Successful reporting in 2010 creates eligibility for 1.0% bonus
1/1/2010 12/31/2010
Quality Reporting System.
paid in 2011.
3027
Extension
of
Gainsharing
Duration of existing gainsharing projects extended from
1/1/2010 9/30/2011
Demonstration.
current termination date of 12/31/2009.
CRS-91
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
3102
Extension of the Work
Extends the 1.00 floor for the geographic index for physician
1/1/2010 12/31/2010
Geographic Index Floor and
work from prior termination date of 12/31/2009.
Revisions to the Practice Expense
Geographic Adjustment Under
the Medicare Physician Fee
Schedule.
3102
Extension of the Work
Secretary to adjust the practice expense GPCI for 2010 and
1/1/2010 12/31/2011
Geographic Index Floor and
2011 to reflect 1/2 of the difference between the relative costs
Revisions to the Practice Expense of employee wages and rents in each of the different fee
Geographic Adjustment Under
schedule areas and the national averages.
the Medicare Physician Fee
Schedule.
3103
Extension of Exceptions Process
Extends the exceptions process for therapy caps from prior
1/1/2010 12/31/2010
for Medicare Therapy Caps.
expiration of 12/31/2009.
3104
Extension of Payment for
Direct payment for the technical component of certain
1/1/2010 12/31/2010
Technical Component of Certain
pathology services is extended from prior expiration date of
Physician Pathology Services.
12/31/2009.
3105(a)
10311
Extension of Ambulance Add-
Bonus payments and increased ground ambulance payments are 1/1/2010 1/1/2011
ons.
extended from prior expiration date of 12/31/2009.
3105(b)
10311
Extension of Ambulance Add-
Payment of certain urban air ambulance services as rural air
1/1/2010 12/31/2010
ons.
ambulance services is extended from current expiration date of
12/31/2009,
3107
Extension of Physician Fee
Extends a 5% add-on payment for mental health services, from
1/1/2010 12/31/2010
Schedule Mental Health Add-On. prior expiration date of 12/31/2009.
3111
Payment for Bone Density Tests.
Increases payments for DXA services in 2010 and 2011;
1/1/2010 12/31/2011
payments set at 70% of the 2006 reimbursement rates.
3121
Extension and Expansion of
Rural hospitals (with no more than 100 beds) that are not
1/1/2010 12/31/2010
Outpatient Hold Harmless
SCHs are eligible for hold harmless payments of 85% of the
Provision.
prior HOPD payment amount. All SCHs will receive 85%
HOPD hold harmless payments.
3129
Extension of and Revisions to
Establishes new uses for Medicare flex grants.
1/1/2010
Al
Medicare Rural Hospital
subsequent
Flexibility Program.
years.
CRS-92
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
1109
Payment
for
Qualifying
Hospitals. Pay $400 million to IPPS hospitals in lowest quartile of counties
1/1/2010 9/30/2012
according to age, sex and race adjusted Part A and B benefit
payments per beneficiary.
3201
10318 1102(f)
Medicare Advantage Payment.
Repeal of Comparative Cost Adjustment Program
1/1/2010
3205
Extension for Specialized MA
Temporarily extends SNP authority.
1/1/2010
12/31/2013
Plans for Special Needs
Individuals.
3205
Extension for Specialized MA
Extends period during which SNPs that do not have contracts
1/1/2010 12/31/2012
Plans for Special Needs
with Medicaid programs may continue to operate, but not
Individuals.
expand their service area.
3206
Extension of Reasonable Cost
Extends for 3 years the time reasonable cost plans may operate 1/1/2010 1/1/2013
Contracts.
regardless of other MA plans in the area.
3208
Making Senior Housing Facility
Secretary required to establish new MA plan allowed to limit
1/1/2010 Al
Demonstration Permanent.
service area to a senior housing facility.
subsequent
years.
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap
Medicare Part D enrollees who reach the coverage gap in 2010
1/1/2010 12/31/2010
Discount Program for Brand-
receive a $250 rebate.
Name Drugs and Closing the
Medicare Prescription Drug
“Donut Hole.”
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
HOPD: CY2010 and CY2011 update reduction of 0.25
1/1/2010 12/31/2011
Basket Updates and
percentage points.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
4105
Evidence-Based Coverage of
Authorizes the Secretary to modify coverage of preventive
1/1/2010 Al
Medicare Preventive Services.
services under Part B, including by withholding payment, as long
subsequent
as changes are consistent with recommendations of the U.S.
years.
Preventive Services Task Force
CRS-93
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
6003
Disclosure Requirements for In-
With respect to MRI, CT, PET, and other services as
1/1/2010 Al
Office Ancillary Services
determined by Secretary, referring physician must inform
subsequent
Exception to the Prohibition on
individual in writing at time of referral that individual may
years.
Physician Self-Referral for Certain obtain services from someone other than referring physician,
Imaging Services.
physician in same group practice as referring physician, or
individual supervised by referring physician or physician in
group practice. A written list of area suppliers must be
provided.
6404
Maximum Period of Submission
Secretary is required to reduce maximum period for
1/1/2010 Al
of Medicare Claims Reduced to
submission of Medicare claims to no more than 12 months
subsequent
Not More Than 12 Months.
instead of 3 years.
years.
6406
Requirement for Physicians to
Secretary has the authority to disenroll, for no more than one
1/1/2010 Al
Provide Documentation on
year, a Medicare enrolled physician or supplier that fails to
subsequent
Referrals to Programs at High
maintain and provide access to written orders or requests for
years.
Risk of Waste and Abuse.
payment for DME, certification for home health services, or
referrals for other items and services to the Secretary.
6407
10605
Face-to-Face Encounter with
Physicians required to have a face-to-face encounter (including
1/1/2010 Al
Patient Required Before
through telehealth) with the individual prior to issuing a
subsequent
Physicians May Certify Eligibility
certification or re-certification for home health services or
years.
for Home Health Services or
DME.
Durable Medical Equipment
Under Medicare.
6408
Enhanced Penalties.
Secretary has the authority to impose penalties on MA or Part
1/1/2010 Al
D plans that commit certain marketing violations, including
subsequent
enrolling beneficiaries in a plan without their consent,
years.
transferring an individual from one plan to another for the
purpose of earning a commission, failing to comply with
marketing requirements, or employing or contracting with an
individual or entity that violates the terms of the contract.
6408
Enhanced Penalties.
Secretary has the authority to impose a CMP in the amount of
1/1/2010 Al
$50,000 on persons who knowingly make, use, or cause to be
subsequent
made or used any false statement material to a fraudulent claim.
years.
CRS-94
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
6408
Enhanced Penalties.
Secretary has the authority to impose a CMP of $15,000 on
1/1/2010 Al
persons who fail to grant timely access, upon reasonable
subsequent
request to the OIG, for the purpose of audits, investigations,
years.
evaluations, or other statutory functions of the OIG for each
day of failure.
3109
Exemption of Certain Pharmacies Upon enactment, delays accreditation requirement for all
3/23/2010 1/11/2011
from Accreditation Requirements pharmacies, although all pharmacies must meet accreditation
requirements to participate in competitive bidding.
3110
Part B Special Enrollment Period
A 12-month special enrollment period is created so that
3/23/2010 Al
for Disabled Tricare
military retirees eligible for TRICARE and entitled to Medicare
subsequent
Beneficiaries.
Part A, who had previously declined Part B, may sign up for
years.
Part B without penalty during the 12-month period beginning
on the day after the last day of the initial enrollment period of
the individual or, if later, the 12-month period beginning with
the month the individual is notified by the Secretary of Defense
of enrollment.
3112
Revision to the Medicare
Eliminates the funding in the MIF.
3/23/2010
Improvement Fund.
10323
Medicare
Coverage
for
Certain individuals exposed to environmental hazards are
3/23/2010
Individuals Exposed to
eligible for medical coverage and medical screening services.
Environmental Health Hazards.
3123
10313
Extension and Expansion of
Expansion of budget neutral demonstration project for
3/23/2010 9/30/2015
Rural Community Hospital
additional qualifying rural hospitals.
Demonstration Program.
3126
Improvements
to
the
Eliminates the limit of 6 eligible counties that may participate in
3/23/2010 Al
Demonstration Project on
the demonstration project within the qualifying states. Rural
subsequent
Community Health Integration
health clinic services no longer one of specified CAH services.
years.
Models in Certain Rural
Rural health clinic services removed from the definition of
Counties.
other essential services and replaced with physician services.
3131
10315
Payment Adjustments for Home
Reduces the standard HHRG payment amounts for home
3/23/2010 Al
Health Care.
health agencies such that aggregate reduction will equal five
subsequent
percent of total prospective HH payments. Restricts the total
years.
amount of additional payments for outliers from exceeding
2.5% of total HH prospective payments in a given fiscal year (or
calendar year). Implementation date for this provision was not
specified.
CRS-95
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
3134
Misvalued Codes Under the
Secretary to periodically identify physician services as being
3/23/2010 Al
Physician Fee Schedule.
potentially misvalued, and make appropriate adjustments to the
subsequent
relative values of such services under the Medicare physician
years.
fee schedule.
3134
Misvalued Codes Under the
Repeals Section 4505(d) of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997,
3/23/2010
Physician Fee Schedule.
which established requirements for developing new resource-
based practice expense relative value units, as wel as Section
1868(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ee(a)), which
established the Practicing Physicians Advisory Council, a group
of physicians who meet quarterly to discuss proposed changes
in regulations and carrier manual instructions related to
physician services.
Elimination of MA Regional Plan
Eliminates the MA regional plan stabilization fund and transfers
3/23/2010
10327(c)
Stabilization Fund.
amounts in the fund to the Part B trust fund.
3306
Funding Outreach and Assistance Extends MIPPA Section 119 and provides an additional $45
3/23/2010 Until
for Low-Income Programs.
million for outreach and education activities related to
expended.
Medicare low-income assistance programs for FY2010-FY2012
and is available until expended.
3311
Improved Medicare Prescription
The Secretary is to develop and maintain a system to handle
3/23/2010 Al
Drug Plan and MA-PD Complaint complaints regarding Part D plans or their sponsors which has
subsequent
System.
the ability to report and initiate appropriate interventions and
years.
monitoring and to guide quality improvement.
6001
10601
1106
Limitation on Medicare Exception Precludes physician-owned ambulatory surgery centers from
3/23/2010 Al
to the Prohibition on Certain
converting to a hospital and qualifying for exemption from the
subsequent
Physician Referrals for Hospitals.
Stark self-referral prohibition after the date of enactment.
years.
6001
10601
1106
Limitation on Medicare Exception Establishes that the percentage of the total value of the
3/23/2010 Al
to the Prohibition on Certain
physician ownership or investment interest in the hospital or in
subsequent
Physician Referrals for Hospitals.
an entity whose assets include the hospital cannot increase
years.
after the date of enactment.
6301 10602
Patient-Centered
Outcomes PCOR Trust Fund created.
3/23/2010
Research.
CRS-96
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
6401
10603
1304
Provider Screening and Other
Providers or suppliers enrolling or re-enrolling in Medicare,
3/23/2010 Al
Enrollment Requirements Under
Medicaid, or CHIP will be required to disclose current or
subsequent
Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP.
previous affiliations with any provider or supplier that has
years.
uncollected debt, has had their payments suspended, has been
excluded, or has had their billing privileges revoked.
6401
10603
1304
Provider Screening and Other
Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP providers will be required to
3/23/2010 Al
Enrollment Requirements Under
establish a compliance program, in accordance with
subsequent
Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP.
requirements established by the Secretary.
years.
6402
1303
Enhanced Medicare and Medicaid
CMS is to include in its IDR claims and payment data from the
3/23/2010 Al
Program Integrity Provisions.
following programs: Medicare (Parts A, B, C, and D), Medicaid,
subsequent
CHIP, health-related programs administered by the VA and
years.
DOD, Social Security, and IHS. The Secretary is required to
enter into data sharing agreements with the federal agencies
above for the purposes of identifying fraud, waste, and abuse.
6402
1303
Enhanced Medicare and Medicaid
Secretary is required to impose penalties against beneficiaries
3/23/2010 Al
Program Integrity Provisions.
entitled to or enrolled in Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP who
subsequent
knowingly participate in a health care fraud offense.
years.
6402
1303
Enhanced Medicare and Medicaid
Individuals required to report and return an overpayment
3/23/2010 Al
Program Integrity Provisions.
within 60 days (instead of 30 days). Overpayments reported
subsequent
after this date will be considered an obligation as defined in
years.
Title 31 of the USC.
6402
1303
Enhanced Medicare and Medicaid
Individuals or entities that make a false statement or
3/23/2010 Al
Program Integrity Provisions.
misrepresentation on an application to enroll or participate in a
subsequent
federal health care program are subject to OIG’s permissive
years.
exclusion authority.
6402
1303
Enhanced Medicare and Medicaid
Secretary has the authority to impose a penalty in the amount
3/23/2010 Al
Program Integrity Provisions.
of $50,000 on individuals who have been excluded from a
subsequent
federal health care program who order or prescribe an item or
years.
service; individuals who make false statements on enrollment
applications, bids, or contracts to participate in a federal health
care program; or persons who know of an overpayment and do
not return the overpayment.
6402
1303
Enhanced Medicare and Medicaid
The Secretary has statutory authority to suspend payments to
3/23/2010 Al
Program Integrity Provisions.
providers and suppliers pending an investigation of fraud.
subsequent
years.
CRS-97
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
6403
Elimination of Duplication
The Secretary is required to begin implementing a transition
3/23/2010
Between the Healthcare Integrity
process for transferring data stored in the HIPDB to the
and Protection Data Bank and
NPDB.
the National Practitioner Data
Bank.
6411
Expansion of the Recovery Audit
The Secretary is required to begin entering into contracts with
3/23/2010 12/31/2010
Contractor Program.
RACs for Medicare Part C and D activities.
10606
Health Care Fraud Enforcement.
The U.S. Sentencing Commission will now be required to
3/23/2010
review and amend the federal sentencing guidelines and policy
statements applicable to persons convicted of federal health
care offenses.
10606
Health Care Fraud Enforcement.
Certain existing criminal offenses are deemed as “federal
3/23/2010
healthcare fraud offenses” under the U.S. Criminal Code.
Convictions for violations of the specified statutes may be
punishable by longer prison terms and/or higher fines, and
other enforcement mechanisms may apply.
1302
Medicare
Prepayment
Medical
Medicare contractors no longer have to abide by limitations
3/23/2010 Al
Review Limitations.
established in the MMA related to pre-payment review of
subsequent
claims.
years.
3131
10315
Payment Adjustments for Home
Start date for rural add-on payments to HHAs.
4/1/2010
1/1/2016
Health Care.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IPPS hospital: FY2010 update reduction of 0.25 percentage
4/1/2010 9/30/2010
Basket Updates and
points (applies to discharges beginning on the specified date).
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IRF: FY2010 update reduction of 0.25 percentage points
4/1/2010 9/30/2010
Basket Updates and
(applies to discharges beginning on the specified date).
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
CRS-98
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
LTCH: RY2010 update reduction of 0.25 percentage points
4/1/2010 9/30/2010
Basket Updates and
(applies to discharges beginning on the specified date).
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3122
Extension
of
Medicare
Cost reimbursement for clinical laboratory services provided
7/1/2010 7/1/2011
Reasonable Costs Payments for
by certain qualifying rural hospitals with less than 50 beds will
Certain Clinical Diagnostic
be reinstated for one year.
Laboratory Tests Furnished to
Hospital Patients in Certain Rural
Areas.
3135
1107
Modification of Equipment
Increase the technical component payment reduction for
7/1/2010 Al
Utilization Factor for Advanced
sequential imaging services on contiguous body parts during the
subsequent
Imaging Services.
same visit from 25% to 50%.
years.
3139
Payment for Biosimilar Biological
A Part B biosimilar product approved by the FDA may be
7/1/2010 Al
Products.
reimbursed at the ASP of the biosimilar plus 6% of the
subsequent
reference product.
years.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IPF: RY2011 and RY2012 update reduction of 0.25 percentage
7/1/2010 6/30/2012
Basket Updates and
points.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
6405
10604
Physicians Who Order Items and
Deadline for physicians or eligible professionals who submit
7/1/2010
Services Required to be Medicare written orders or certifications for DME or HH services to be
Enrolled Physicians or Eligible
enrolled in the Medicare program.
Professionals.
6401
10603
1304
Provider Screening and Other
Secretary has 180 days to develop, in consultation with the
9/19/2010
Enrollment Requirements Under
OIG, procedures related to provider screening, Secretary has
Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP.
the authority to begin charging institutional providers $500 to
cover the costs of the screening.
6301 10602
Patient-Centered
Outcomes CG appoints 17 PCORI Board members.
9/23/2010
Research.
CRS-99
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
6409
Medicare
Self-Referral
Disclosure
Secretary, in cooperation with the OIG, must establish a SRDP
9/23/2010
Protocol.
to enable health care providers and suppliers to disclose actual
or potential violations of the physician self-referral law.
Secretary must also post information on CMS' website on how
to disclose actual or potential SRDP violations.
3123
10313
Extension of the Rural
Extends budget neutral demonstration project for participating
10/1/2010 9/30/2015
Community Hospital
rural hospitals for an additional 5 years.
Demonstration Program.
3125
10314
Temporary Improvements to the
Eases the distance requirements (from a 25 to a 15 road mile
10/1/2010 10/1/2012
Medicare Inpatient Hospital
separation), alters the number of discharges (from 800 total
Payment Adjustment for Low-
discharges to 1,600 Medicare discharges) and increases the
Volume Hospitals.
percentage adjustment qualifying low volume hospitals
(beginning FY 2011).
3128
Technical Correction Related to
Reinstates Medicare payments for certain HOPD facility
10/1/2010 Al
Critical Access Hospital Services. services to 101% of reasonable costs.
subsequent
years.
10324
Protections for Frontier States.
Establish wage index floor of 1 for IPPS hospitals in certain
10/1/2010 Al
frontier states
subsequent
years.
3137
10317
Hospital Wage Index
Restores reclassification thresholds (to be used by the MGCRB
10/1/2010 12/31/2012
Improvement.
when making reclassification decisions) to the percentages used
or earlier
in FY2009 and in subsequent fiscal years until the first fiscal
year that is one year after the date of submission of the
Secretary’s wage index reform plan. This date could be earlier if
HHS submits report to Congress earlier than 12/31/2011.
3141
Application of Budget Neutrality
Application of national budget neutrality adjustment to adjust
10/1/2010 Al
on a National Basis in the
for the effect of the rural and imputed rural floor. This replaces
subsequent
Calculation of the Medicare
the state budget neutrality adjustment that had begun to be
years.
Hospital Wage Index Floor for
phased in by CMS.
Each Al -Urban and Rural State.
10325
Revision
to Skilled Nursing
Secretary must implement change in final rule for FY2010
10/1/2010
Facility Prospective Payment
regarding concurrent therapy and changes to the lookback
System.
period.
CRS-100
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IPPS hospital: FY2011 update reduction of 0.25 percentage
10/1/2010 9/30/2011
Basket Updates and
points.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IRF: FY2011 update reduction of 0.25 percentage points.
10/1/2010
9/30/2011
Basket Updates and
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
LTCH: RY2011 update reduction of 0.5 percentage points.
10/1/2010
9/30/2011
Basket Updates and
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
6301 10602
Patient-Centered
Outcomes $50 million transferred from Treasury to PCORTF for FY2011.
10/1/2010
9/30/2011
Research.
3142
HHS Study on Urban Medicare-
Secretary submits study and recommendations to Congress
12/23/2010
Dependent Hospitals.
about increased payments to certain smal urban Medicare
dependent hospitals.
3106
10312
Extension of Certain Payment
The 3 year moratorium on the enforcement of certain LTCH
12/29/2010 12/29/2012
Rules for Long-term Care
payment rules and the establishment of new LTCHs is
Hospital Services and of
extended from 12/29/2010 for 2 years.
Moratorium on the Establishment
of Certain Hospitals and
Facilities.
CRS-101
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2010
Start or
PPACA
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
or Duration
3137
10317
Hospital Wage Index
Deadline by which CMS pays certain hospitals an additional
12/31/2010
Improvement.
amount to reflect the fact that those hospitals had a lower
wage index from October 1, 2009, through March 31, 2010,
than from April 1, 2010, through September 30, 2010, due to
the temporary expiration of Section 508 reclassifications.
6001
10601
1106
Limitation on Medicare Exception Establishes that physician-owned hospitals that have provider
12/31/2010
to the Prohibition on Certain
agreements by this date and meet certain requirements will be
Physician Referrals for Hospitals.
exempt from the Stark self-referral prohibition.
Table C-3. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2011
2011
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3002 10327
Improvements
to
the
Successful reporting of PQRI measures by physicians in
1/1/2011 12/31/2013
Physician Quality Reporting
2011, 2012, and 2013 creates eligibility for 0.5% bonus
System.
for 2012, 2013, and 2014, respectively.
3002 10327
Improvements
to
the
For physicians who meet requirements for Maintenance
1/1/2011 12/31/2014
Physician Quality Reporting
of Certification Program during this time, an additional
System.
0.5% bonus is available.
3006
10301
Plans for a Value-Based
Secretary submits to Congress plans to implement
1/1/2011
Purchasing Program for
Medicare value-based purchasing programs for ASCs.
Skilled Nursing Facilities,
Home Health Agencies, and
Ambulatory Surgical
Centers.
3021
10306
Establishment of Center for
The Secretary is required to establish a Center for
1/1/2011
Medicare and Medicaid
Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMI) within CMS that
Innovation Within CMS.
will test innovative payment and service delivery models
to reduce program expenditures under Medicare,
Medicaid, and CHIP.
CRS-102
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2011
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3026
Community-Based
Care Secretary establishes a 5-year program in which eligible
1/1/2011 12/31/2015
Transitions Program.
hospitals and community-based organizations are funded
to provide transition services.
3108
Permitting
Physician Physician assistants without employment relationships
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Assistants to Order Post-
with a SNF may certify the need for post-hospital
years.
Hospital Extended Care
extended care services.
Services.
3109
Exemption
of
Certain Exempts certain pharmacies from Medicare’s
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Pharmacies from
accreditation requirement, although all pharmacies must
years.
Accreditation Requirements
meet accreditation requirements to participate in
competitive bidding.
3114
Improved
Access
for Increased payments for certified nurse-midwife services
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Certified Nurse-Midwife
will be allowed—up to 100% of the amount provided to
years.
Services.
physicians for the same service.
3127
MedPAC
Study
on
MedPAC study including recommendations due to
1/1/2011
Adequacy of Medicare
Congress.
Payments for Health Care
Providers Serving in Rural
Areas.
10324
Protections for Frontier
Establish wage index floor of 1 for HOPD services
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
States.
provided by acute care hospitals and in certain frontier
years.
states.
10324
Protections for Frontier
Establish a floor on the practice expense component for
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
States.
physician services provided in certain frontier states.
years.
3131 10315
Payment
Adjustments
for
Secretary establishes a provider-specific annual outlier
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Home Health Care.
cap of 10% of HHA revenues.
years.
3132
Hospice Reform.
Secretary begins col ecting additional data and
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
information to revise hospice payments.
years.
3132
Hospice Reform.
Secretary requires, on and after this date, that hospice
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
physicians or advance practice nurses have face-to-face
years.
encounters to determine continued eligibility prior to
recertification.
3135
1107
Modification of Equipment
Changes the utilization rate assumption for calculating
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Utilization Factor for
the payment for advanced imaging equipment from 50%,
years.
Advanced Imaging Services.
as assumed in prior years, to 75%.
CRS-103
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2011
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3136(a)(1)
Revision of Payment for
Changes rental payments for power wheelchairs from
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Power-Driven Wheelchairs.
10% to 15% of the purchase price for the first 3 months,
years.
and from 7.5% to 6% for the remaining 10 months.
3136(a)(2)
Revision of Payment for
Restricts lump-sum purchase option to complex,
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Power-Driven Wheelchairs.
rehabilitative power wheelchairs.
years.
3138
Treatment
of
Certain If outpatient costs incurred by IPPS-exempt cancer
1/1/2011
Cancer Hospitals.
hospitals for drugs and biologics are determined to
exceed those of other HOPDs, establishes an
appropriate OPPS adjustment for cancer hospitals, which
applies to services furnished on or after this date.
3201
10318
1102(b)
Medicare Advantage
Holds the 2011 MA benchmarks at the 2010 level.
1/1/2011
12/31/2011
Payment.
3201
10318
1102(e)
Medicare Advantage
Application of coding intensity adjustment.
1/1/2011
Al subsequent
Payment.
years.
3202
Benefit Protection and
First year MA plans are prohibited from charging cost -
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Simplification.
sharing above FFS amounts for certain services.
years.
3204
Simplification of Annual
First year beneficiaries are prohibited from switching MA
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Beneficiary Election Periods.
plans or enrolling in MA plan from FFS Medicare after the
years.
start of the new benefit year.
3205
Extension for Specialized
Secretary is required to establish a frailty payment
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
MA Plans for Special Needs
adjustment, similar to PACE, for fully integrated dual-
years.
Individuals.
eligible SNPs.
3205
Extension for Specialized
Requires the Secretary to periodically evaluate, revise,
1/1/2011 Periodical y
in
MA Plans for Special Needs
and publish MA risk adjustment payment methodologies
subsequent
Individuals.
and recalibrate payments for higher medical and care
years.
coordination costs for specified conditions.
3207
Technical Correction to MA Secretary is granted authority to waive certain network
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Private Fee-for-Service
requirements for employer-based PFFS with enrollment
years.
Plans.
as of 10/1/2009.
3209
Authority to Deny Plan Bids. Clarifies that Secretary is not required to accept any or
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
every bid submitted by an MA or Part D plan.
years.
CRS-104
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2011
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap
Medicare Part D enrollees in the coverage gap receive a
1/1/2011 12/31/2011
Discount Program for
50% manufacturer discount off the price of brand name
Brand-Name Drugs and
drugs, and receive a Medicare subsidy of 7% of the cost
Closing the Medicare
of generic drugs.
Prescription Drug “Donut
Hole.”
3302
Improvement
in
The Medicare Advantage rebate amounts and
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Determination of Part D
performance bonus payments will be excluded from the
years.
Low-Income Benchmark
MA-PDP premium bids when calculating the low-income
Premium.
subsidy benchmark amounts.
3303
Voluntary De Minimus
Plan sponsors who bid a nominal amount above the
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Policy for Subsidy Eligible
regional low-income subsidy benchmark will be allowed
years.
Individuals Under
to absorb the cost of the difference in order to qualify as
Prescription Drug Plans and
an LIS-eligible plan.
MA-PD Plans.
3304
Special Rule for Widows and A redetermination of low-income subsidy eligibility will
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Widowers Regarding
be delayed for a year after the death of a spouse.
years.
Eligibility for Low-Income
Assistance.
3305
Improved
Information
for
For beneficiaries who are reassigned to new LIS plans,
1/1/2011
Subsidy Eligible Individuals
the Secretary is to transmit within 30 days of the
Reassigned to Prescription
reassignment, information to the beneficiary about
Drug Plans and MA-PD
formulary differences between the former plan and the
Plans.
new plan with respect to the beneficiary's drug regime.
3307
Improving
Formulary Drug plan sponsors will be required to include in their
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Requirements for
plans' formularies all drugs in classes identified as classes
years.
Prescription Drug Plans and
of clinical concern by the Secretary.
MA-PD Plans with Respect
to Certain Categories or
Classes of Drugs.
3308
Reducing Part D Premium
Beneficiaries whose incomes exceed certain income
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Subsidy for High-Income
thresholds will be required to pay higher premiums.
years.
Beneficiaries.
10331
Public
Reporting
of
The Secretary is required to develop a Physician
1/1/2011
Performance Information.
Compare Internet website with information on
physicians enrolled in the Medicare program.
CRS-105
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2011
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3314
Including Costs Incurred By
Costs paid by the Indian Health Service or under an
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
AIDS Drug Assistance
AIDS Drug Assistance Program will count toward a Part
years.
Programs And Indian Health
D enrollee's out-of-pocket threshold.
Service In Providing
Prescription Drugs Toward
The Annual Out Of Pocket
Threshold Under Part D.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
HHA: CY2011, CY2012, and CY2103 update reduction
1/1/2011 12/31/2013
Basket Updates and
of 1.0 percentage point.
Incorporation of
Productivity Improvements
into Market Basket Updates
That Do Not Already
Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
SNF: implement productivity adjustment.
10/1/2011
Al subsequent
Basket Updates and
years.
Incorporation of
Productivity Improvements
into Market Basket Updates
That Do Not Already
Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
Clinical lab: CY2011-CY2015 update reduction of 1.75
1/1/2011 12/31/2015
Basket Updates and
percentage points.
Incorporation of
Productivity Improvements
into Market Basket Updates
That Do Not Already
Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
Ambulance services, ASCs, clinical labs, and all other Part 1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Basket Updates and
B services: implement productivity adjustment.
years.
Incorporation of
Productivity Improvements
into Market Basket Updates
That Do Not Already
Incorporate Such
Improvements.
CRS-106
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2011
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3402
Temporary
Adjustment
to
Freeze at the 2010 levels the income thresholds for
1/1/2011 12/31/2019
the Calculation of Part B
determining beneficiaries subject to the income-related
Premiums.
premium for the period of 2011 through 2019.
4103
10402(b)
Medicare Coverage of
Coverage without cost-sharing required for an annual
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Annual Wel ness Visit
wellness visit and personalized prevention plan for Part B
years.
Providing a Personalized
enrollees.
Prevention Plan.
4104
10406
Removal of Barriers to
Cost-sharing eliminated for almost all preventive services 1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Preventive Services in
covered under Part B (i.e., those services recommended
years.
Medicare.
for use by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force).
5501
Expanding
Access
to A 10% bonus for select E&M and general surgery codes
1/1/2011 12/31/2015
Primary Care Services and
under the Medicare fee schedule for five years.
General Surgery Services.
10501(i)
Development and
Includes the new Medicare definition of preventive
1/1/2011
Implementation of
services as an FQHC service.
Prospective Payment System
for FQHCs.
10501(i)
Development and
Requires FQHCs to submit necessary data to establish
1/1/2011
Implementation of
the PPS.
Prospective Payment System
for FQHCs.
FQHCs May Be Reimbursed
Provides that FQHCs may be reimbursed for Medicare
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
10501(i)(2)
for Medicare Covered
covered preventive services.
years.
Preventive Services.
6401
10603
1304
Provider Screening and
The Secretary is required to impose a 90-day period of
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Other Enrollment
enhanced oversight on DME suppliers initially enrolling in
years.
Requirements Under
the program in instances when there is a significant risk
Medicare, Medicaid, and
of fraud.
CHIP.
6402
1303 Enhanced
Medicare
and Deadline for the Secretary to issue a regulation
1/1/2011
Medicaid Program Integrity
mandating that all Medicare and Medicaid providers
Provisions.
include their NPI on all claims and enrollment
applications.
CRS-107
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2011
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
6410(a)
Adjustments to the
Expands the number of competitive bidding areas
1/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Medicare Durable Medical
included in round 2 by 21 areas when round 2 is
years.
Equipment, Prosthetics,
implemented in 2011 (not necessarily 1/1/2011).
Orthotics, and Supplies
Competitive Acquisition
Program
10330
Modernizing
Computer
and
Deadline for the Secretary to post a plan on its website
1/23/2011
Data Systems of CMS to
for modernizing the computer and data systems of CMS.
Support Improvements in
Care Delivery.
10336
GAO Study and Report on
The Comptroller General is to submit a report on the
3/23/2011
Medicare Beneficiary Access
impact on beneficiaries’ access to quality ESRD services
to High-Quality Dialysis
by including specified oral drugs in the ESRD bundled
Services.
prospective payment system.
6401
10603
1304
Provider Screening and
Revised screening measures will apply to new providers
3/23/2011
Other Enrollment
and suppliers enrolling in Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP.
Requirements Under
Medicare, Medicaid, and
CHIP.
3027
Extension
of
Gainsharing
The current due date of 12/1/2008 for required interim
3/31/2011
Demonstration.
report on quality improvement and savings is extended.
1301
Community
Mental
Health
CMHCs required to demonstrate that they provide at
4/1/2011
Centers.
least 40% of their services to individuals not eligible for
Medicare.
4204(e)
Immunizations.
Deadline for submission of GAO report on access to
6/1/2011
Part D-funded immunizations among Medicare
beneficiaries
3113
Treatment
of
Certain Demonstration project under Medicare Part B that will
7/1/2011 6/30/2013
Complex Diagnostic
make separate payments to laboratories for complex
Laboratory Tests.
diagnostic laboratory tests provided to Medicare
beneficiaries.
3313
Office of the Inspector
The Office of the Inspector General of HHS is to issue its 7/1/2011 Annual y.
General Studies and
first report on the extent to which drugs commonly used
Reports.
by dual eligibles are included on drug formularies
(reports required annual y thereafter).
CRS-108
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2011
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3006
10301
Plans for a Value-Based
Secretary is to submit plans to Congress to implement
10/1/2011
Purchasing Program for
Medicare value-based purchasing for HHAs and SNFs.
Skilled Nursing Facilities,
Home Health Agencies, and
Ambulatory Surgical
Centers.
3124
Extension of the Medicare
Extends the Medicare dependent hospital program, which 10/1/2011 10/1/2012
Dependent Hospital
provides additional payments to certain smal rural
Program.
hospitals.
10325
Revision
to Skilled Nursing
Secretary may not implement RUG-IV changes published
10/1/2011
Facility Prospective Payment
in FY2010 final rule until this date.
System.
3313
Office of the Inspector
The Office of the Inspector General of HHS is to issue a
10/1/2011
General Studies and
report that compares covered prescription drug prices
Reports.
under Medicare Part D to those negotiated by state
Medicaid plans.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IPPS hospital, IRF, and LTCH: implement productivity
10/1/2011 Al
subsequent
Basket Updates and
adjustment.
years.
Incorporation of
Productivity Improvements
into Market Basket Updates
That Do Not Already
Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IPPS hospital and IRF: FY2012 and FY2013 update
10/1/2011 9/30/2013
Basket Updates and
reduction of 0.1 percentage points.
Incorporation of
Productivity Improvements
into Market Basket Updates
That Do Not Already
Incorporate Such
Improvements.
CRS-109
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2011
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
LTCH: implement productivity adjustment.
10/1/2011
Al subsequent
Basket Updates and
years.
Incorporation of
Productivity Improvements
into Market Basket Updates
That Do Not Already
Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
LTCH: RY2012 and RY2013 update reduction of 0.1
10/1/2011 9/30/2013
Basket Updates and
percentage points.
Incorporation of
Productivity Improvements
into Market Basket Updates
That Do Not Already
Incorporate Such
Improvements.
6301 10602
Patient-Centered
Outcomes
$150 million transferred from Treasury to PCORTF for
10/1/2011 9/30/2012
Research.
FY2012.
3137(b)
10317
Hospital Wage Index
Deadline for HHS Secretary report to Congress on
12/31/2011
Improvement.
reforming wage index.
CRS-110
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Table C-4. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2012
2012
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3003
Improvements
to
the Secretary to provide comparative resource use pattern
1/1/2012 Al
subsequent
Physician Feedback Program.
reports to physicians.
years.
3003
Improvements
to
the Secretary to develop episode grouper.
1/1/2012
Physician Feedback Program.
3007
Value-Based
Payment Secretary to publish (1) specific measures of cost and
1/1/2012
Modifier Under the Physician
quality, (2) specific dates for implementation, and (3) the
Fee Schedule.
proposed prospective performance period for a budget-
neutral value-based payment modifier.
3008
Payment
Adjustment
for HHS study on extending HAC policy to other providers
1/1/2012
Conditions Acquired in
is due to Congress.
Hospitals.
3022
10307
Medicare Shared Savings
Secretary establishes a shared savings program in which
1/1/2012 Al
subsequent
Program.
eligible ACOs qualify for an annual incentive bonus if
years.
they achieve a threshold savings amount established for
the three-year agreement period.
3024
Independence at Home
Secretary establishes Medicare demonstration project to 1/1/2012
Demonstration Program.
test the use of home-based primary care teams for
certain chronically ill beneficiaries.
3102
Extension of the Work
Based on the Secretary’s analysis and evaluation of
1/1/2012 Al
subsequent
Geographic Index Floor and
current methods of establishing PE GPCI under the
years.
Revisions to the Practice
physician fee schedule, the Secretary will make
Expense Geographic
appropriate adjustments (for 2012 and subsequent
Adjustment Under the
years) to the PE GPCI to ensure accurate geographic
Medicare Physician Fee
adjustments across payment areas.
Schedule.
3201
10318
1102(b)
Medicare Advantage Payment. Begin phase-in of calculation tying benchmarks to
1/1/2012 1/1/2013
spending in FFS Medicare. (Phase-in to take 2-6 years.)
3201
10318
1102(c)
Medicare Advantage Payment. In general, 1.5 percentage point benchmark bonus for
1/1/2012 12/31/2012
quality MA plans (4 stars or more out of a 5 star quality
scale). Double the bonus for quality plans in qualifying
areas.
3201
10318
1102(d)
Medicare Advantage Payment. 3-year phase-in of rebate calculation based on plan
1/1/2012 Fully
phased
in
quality: 4.5 stars or greater = 70% rebate; 3.5 stars but
by 1/1/2015
less than 4.5 stars = 65%; less than 3.5 stars = 50%.
CRS-111
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2012
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3204
Simplification of Annual
MA and Part D annual coordinated election period
1/1/2012 Al
subsequent
Beneficiary Election Periods.
changed to October 15 to December 7th each year
years.
(from November 15 to December 31).
3205
Extension for Specialized MA
SNPs are required to be approved by the National
1/1/2012 Al
subsequent
Plans for Special Needs
Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) in order to
years.
Individuals.
serve targeted populations.
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap
Medicare Part D enrollees in the coverage gap receive a
1/1/2012 12/31/2012
Discount Program for Brand-
50% manufacturer discount off the price of brand name
Name Drugs and Closing the
drugs, and receive a Medicare subsidy of 14% of the cost
Medicare Prescription Drug
of generic drugs.
“Donut Hole.”
3309
Elimination of Cost Sharing
No earlier than this date, cost-sharing may be eliminated 1/1/2012 Al
subsequent
for Certain Dual Eligible
for low-income enrollees who receive care under a
years.
Individuals.
home and community based waiver who would
otherwise require institutional care.
3310
Reducing Wasteful Dispensing Part D sponsors will be required to employ utilization
1/1/2012 Al
subsequent
of Outpatient Prescription
management techniques determined by the Secretary
years.
Drugs in Long-Term Care
when dispensing medications to beneficiaries in long-
Facilities Under Prescription
term care facilities to reduce waste.
Drug Plans and MA-PD Plans.
3312
Uniform
Exceptions
and Part D plans will be required to use a single, uniform
1/1/2012 Al
subsequent
Appeals Process for
exceptions and appeals process.
years.
Prescription Drug Plans and
MA-PD Plans.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
HOPD: implement productivity adjustment.
1/1/2012
Al subsequent
Basket Updates and
years.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
CRS-112
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2012
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
HOPD: CY2012 and CY2013 update reduction of 0.1
1/1/2012 12/31/2013
Basket Updates and
percentage points.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
Dialysis: implement productivity adjustment.
1/1/2012
Al subsequent
Basket Updates and
years.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
6001
10601
1106
Limitation on Medicare
Requires that the regulations establishing the application
1/1/2012
Exception to the Prohibition
process be implemented.
on Certain Physician Referrals
for Hospitals.
6001
10601
1106
Limitation on Medicare
Requires the application process to permit expansion of
2/1/2012
Exception to the Prohibition
certain qualifying physician-owned hospitals be
on Certain Physician Referrals established.
for Hospitals.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based Requires a 3-year budget-neutral VBP demonstration
3/23/2012 3/23/2015
Purchasing Program.
projects for CAHs be established.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based Requires a 3-year budget-neutral VBP demonstration
3/23/2012 3/23/2015
Purchasing Program.
projects for small volume IPPS hospitals be established.
6409
Medicare
Self-Referral Secretary must submit report to Congress, not later
3/23/2012
Disclosure Protocol.
than 18 months after the date on which the SRDP is
established (no later than 6 months after enactment),on
implementation of this section.
6402
1303 Enhanced
Medicare
and Beginning with FY2011, the Secretary is required to
3/28/2012 Al
subsequent
Medicaid Program Integrity
submit an annual report (not later than 180 days after
years.
Provisions.
the end of each fiscal year) to Congress on the
effectiveness of Medicare Integrity Program (MIP) funds.
CRS-113
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2012
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
6004
Prescription
Drug
Sample
No later than April 1 of each year, drug manufacturers
4/1/2012 Al
subsequent
Transparency.
and authorized distributors of applicable drugs must
years.
submit to Secretary the identity and quantity of drug
samples requested and distributed under Section 503 of
the Prescription Drug Marketing Act of 1987.
6001
10601
1106
Limitation on Medicare
Requires that compliance audits for physician owned
5/1/2012
Exception to the Prohibition
hospitals be established.
on Certain Physician Referrals
for Hospitals.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IPF: implement productivity adjustment.
7/1/2012
Al subsequent
Basket Updates and
years.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IPF: RY2013 and RY2014 update reduction of 0.1
7/1/2012 6/30/2014
Basket Updates and
percentage points.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based 1.0% penalty to base DRG payment amounts for
10/1/2012 9/30/2013
Purchasing Program.
discharges from IPPS hospitals that do not provide high
quality care to Medicare beneficiaries as indicated by
their performance on certain measures.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based Hospital quality reporting requirements are modified to
10/1/2012
Purchasing Program.
incorporate risk adjustment and to the extent
practicable measures would be endorsed by consensus
organizations.
3004
Quality Reporting for Long-
Applicable quality measures for RY2014 for LTCHS and
10/1/2012
term Care Hospitals,
FY2014 for IRFs and hospices must be published.
Inpatient Rehabilitation
Hospitals and Hospice
Programs.
CRS-114
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2012
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3005
Quality Reporting for PPS-
Starting FY2014, IPPS exempt cancer hospitals that do
10/1/2012 Al
subsequent
Exempt Cancer Hospitals.
not submit required quality data will have their update
years.
reduced by 2 percentage points.
3005
Quality Reporting for PPS-
Applicable quality measures for FY2014 for cancer
10/1/2012
Exempt Cancer Hospitals.
hospitals must be published.
10322
Quality Reporting for
Applicable quality measures for RY2014 for IPFs must be 10/1/2012
Psychiatric Hospitals.
published.
3025(a) 10309
Hospital
Readmissions Starting for discharges on this date, the Secretary is to
10/1/2012 Al
subsequent
Reduction Program.
establish a hospital readmissions reduction program for
years.
certain potential y preventable Medicare inpatient
hospital readmissions covering 3 conditions with high
volume or high rate (or both).
3025(a) 10309
Hospital
Readmissions The floor adjustment factor for hospital discharges is
10/1/2012 9/30/2013
Reduction Program.
0.99. The greater of the floor adjustment factor or the
excess readmissions ratio will be used to lower hospital
discharge payments for hospitals with excess
readmissions.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
Hospice: implement productivity adjustment.
10/1/2012
Al subsequent
Basket Updates and
years.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
Hospice: FY2013 update reduction of 0.3 percentage
10/1/2012 9/30/2013
Basket Updates and
points.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
6301 10602
Patient-Centered
Outcomes
Fees from insured (including self-insured) plans
10/1/2012 9/30/2019
Research.
transferred to PCORTF: $1 per insured life in 2013, $2
(adjusted for inflation) per insured life in FY2014
through FY2019.
CRS-115
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2012
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
6301 10602
Patient-Centered
Outcomes
Funds transferred from Medicare Trust Funds to
10/1/2012 9/30/2019
Research.
PCORTF: $1 per insured life in 2013, $2 (adjusted for
inflation) per insured life inFY2014 through FY2019.
3021
10306
Establishment of Center for
Beginning in 2012 (no date specified), the Secretary is
Unspecified date Not less than
Medicare and Medicaid
required to submit a report to Congress at least every
in 2012
once every
Innovation Within CMS.
other year on CMI activities.
other year.
Table C-5. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2013
2013
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
or Duration
10331
Public Reporting of Performance
The Secretary is required to implement a plan for making
1/1/2013
Information.
publicly available information on physician performance
through Physician Compare on the CMS website.
3023
10308
National Pilot Program on
Secretary establishes a 5-year pilot to coordinate care
1/1/2013 12/31/2017
Payment Bundling.
across a hospital episode (inpatient and post-hospital).
3201
10318
1102(c)
Medicare Advantage Payment.
In general, 3.0 percentage point benchmark bonus for
1/1/2013 12/31/2013
quality MA plans (4 stars or more out of a 5 star quality
scale). Double the bonus for quality plans in qualifying
areas.
3205
Extension for Specialized MA
Secretary is required to establish a process to transition
1/1/2013
Plans for Special Needs
SNP beneficiaries that do not qualify as special needs
Individuals.
individuals to FFS Medicare or other MA plans (non-SNP).
Beneficiaries enrolled in specialized MA plans prior to
1/1/2010 are to be transitioned FFS Medicare or non-SNP
MA plans by this date.
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap
Medicare Part D enrollees in the coverage gap receive a
1/1/2013 12/31/2013
Discount Program for Brand-
50% manufacturer discount and a Medicare subsidy of
Name Drugs and Closing the
2.5% of the cost of brand name drugs, and receive a
Medicare Prescription Drug
Medicare subsidy of 21% of the cost of generic drugs.
“Donut Hole.”
CRS-116
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2013
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
or Duration
10328
Improvement in Part D
Part D sponsors will be required to include in their MTM
1/1/2013 Al
Medication Therapy Management
programs an annual comprehensive medication review,
subsequent
Programs.
furnished in person or using telehealth technologies, and
years.
provide follow-up interventions as warranted.
10501(i)
Development
and
Establishes a new PPS for FQHC services.
1/1/2013
Implementation of Prospective
Payment System for FQHCs.
9015 10906
Additional
Hospital
Insurance
PPACA imposes an additional income tax of 0.9% on high-
1/1/2013 Al
Tax on High-Income Taxpayers.
income workers on wages over $200,000 for single filers
subsequent
and $250,000 for joint filers. Revenues from this provision
years.
are transferred to the Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust
Fund (Part A)
1402
Unearned
Income
Medicare
PPACA imposes a new tax on net investment income for
1/1/2013 Al
Contribution.
households with modified adjusted gross income over
subsequent
$200,000 single and $250,000 filing jointly.
years.
3027
Extension
of
Gainsharing The due date of 5/1/2010 for the required final report is
3/31/2013
Demonstration.
extended.
6002
Transparency Reports and
On this date and on the 90th day of each calendar year
3/31/2013 Al
Reporting of Physician
thereafter, covered drug, device, biological and medical
subsequent
Ownership or Investment
supply manufacturers that make a payment or another
years.
Interests.
transfer of value to a covered recipient must report
specified information on those transactions to the
Secretary of HHS.
6002
Transparency Reports and
On this date and on the 90th day of each calendar year
3/31/2013 Al
Reporting of Physician
thereafter, manufacturers and group purchasing
subsequent
Ownership or Investment
organizations must report to the Secretary of HHS certain
years.
Interests.
information regarding an ownership or investment interest
held by a physician (or an immediate family member) in the
manufacturer or group purchasing organization during the
preceding year.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
Chief Actuary of CMS submits determination of whether
4/30/2013 Al
Board.
projected Medicare per capita growth rate for the
subsequent
implementation year (two years later) exceeds the
years.
projected Medicare per capita target growth rate for the
implementation year; determination submitted annual y
thereafter.
CRS-117
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2013
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
or Duration
10322
Quality Reporting for Psychiatric
Starting RY2014, IPFs that do not submit required quality
7/1/2013 Al
Hospitals.
data will have their update reduced by 2 percentage
subsequent
points.
years.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
By this date, IPAB submits draft copy of proposal to the
9/1/2013 Al
Board.
Secretary for Secretary's review and comment, and to
subsequent
MedPAC.
years (subject
to certain
conditions)
4202(b)
Medicare
Demonstration:
Deadline for Secretary to submit report to Congress on
9/30/2013
Promotion of Healthy Lifestyles.
required evaluation of community-based prevention and
wellness programs that have demonstrated potential to
help Medicare beneficiaries through reducing their risk of
disease, disability, and injury by making healthy lifestyle
choices, including exercise, diet, and self-management of
chronic diseases.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based
Purchasing
1.25% penalty to base DRG payment amounts for
10/1/2013 9/30/2014
Program.
discharges from IPPS hospitals that do not provide high
quality care to Medicare beneficiaries as indicated by their
performance on certain measures.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based
Purchasing
Hospital specific payments for MDHs would be subject to
10/1/2013 Al
Program.
VBP penalty for discharges starting in FY2014 (such
subsequent
payments to SCHs are exempt in perpetuity).
years.
3004(a)
Quality Reporting for Long-term
Starting RY2014, LTCHs that do not submit required
10/1/2013 Al
Care Hospitals, Inpatient
quality data will have their update reduced by 2 percentage
subsequent
Rehabilitation Hospitals and
points.
years.
Hospice Programs.
3004(b)
Quality Reporting for Long-term
Starting FY2014, IRFs that do not submit required quality
10/1/2013 Al
Care Hospitals, Inpatient
data will have their update reduced by 2 percentage
subsequent
Rehabilitation Hospitals and
points.
years.
Hospice Programs.
3004(c)
Quality Reporting for Long-term
Starting FY2014, hospices that do not submit required
10/1/2013 Al
Care Hospitals, Inpatient
quality data will have their update reduced by 2 percentage
subsequent
Rehabilitation Hospitals and
points.
years.
Hospice Programs.
CRS-118
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2013
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
or Duration
3025(a)
10309
Hospital Readmissions Reduction
The floor adjustment factor for hospital discharges is 0.98.
10/1/2013 9/30/2014
Program.
The greater of the floor adjustment factor or the excess
readmissions ratio will be used to lower hospital discharge
payments for hospitals with excess readmissions.
3132
Hospice
Reform.
Not earlier than this date, Secretary will implement budget 10/1/2013 Al
neutral revisions to the hospice payment methodology.
subsequent
years.
3133 10316
1041
Improvement
to
Medicare
Lowers Medicare DSH payments to IPPS hospitals to 25%
10/1/2013 Al
Disproportionate Share Hospital
of what otherwise would have been made.
subsequent
Payments.
years.
3133 10316
1041
Improvement
to
Medicare
Pays IPPS hospitals an additional amount that reflects (1)
10/1/2013 9/30/2014
Disproportionate Share Hospital
the difference in its DSH payments; (2) the difference in
Payments.
the uninsured minus 0.1 percentage points; and (3) the
relative percentage of the hospital's uncompensated care.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IPPS hospital: FY2014 update reduction of 0.3 percentage
10/1/2013 9/30/2014
Basket Updates and
points.
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
IRF: FY2014 update reduction of 0.3 percentage points.
10/1/2013
9/30/2014
Basket Updates and
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
LTCH: RY2014 update reduction of 0.3 percentage points.
10/1/2013
9/30/2014
Basket Updates and
Incorporation of Productivity
Improvements into Market
Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
CRS-119
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2013
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
or Duration
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market
Hospice: FY2014-FY2019 update reduction of 0.3
10/1/2013 9/30/2019
Basket Updates and
percentage points contingent on the level of the insured
Incorporation of Productivity
population relative to the projected insured population for
Improvements into Market
the year preceding enactment (the level of the non-elderly
Basket Updates That Do Not
insured population must be 5 or fewer percentage points
Already Incorporate Such
above the projections for the update to take effect).
Improvements.
3007
Value-Based
Payment
Modifier
Secretary to begin implementing the value-based payment
“2013
Under the Physician Fee
adjustment.
rulemaking
Schedule.
process.”
Table C-6. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2014
2014
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3007
Value-Based
Payment
Modifier During performance period, Secretary is to provide
1/1/2014 12/31/2014
Under the Physician Fee Schedule.
information to physicians about the value of care they
provide, as reflected by the measures of relative quality
and cost.
3131
10315
Payment Adjustments for Home
Secretary rebases home health payments. These
1/1/2014 12/31/2017
Health Care.
adjustments are phased in over 4 years in equal
increments that must not exceed 3.5% of the HH PPS
base payment amount as of the date of enactment.
3133 10316
1041
Improvement
to
Medicare Pays IPPS hospitals an additional amount that reflects
10/1/2014 9/30/2019
Disproportionate Share Hospital
(1) the difference in its DSH payments; (2) the
Payments.
difference in the uninsured minus 0.2 percentage points
and (3) the relative percentage of the hospital’s
uncompensated care.
3201
10318
1102(c)
Medicare Advantage Payment.
In general, 5.0 percentage point benchmark bonus for
1/1/2014 Al
subsequent
quality MA plans (4 stars or more out of a 5 star
years.
quality scale). Double the bonus for quality plans in
qualifying areas.
CRS-120
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2014
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3201
10318
1102(e)
Medicare Advantage Payment.
Start of minimum required coding intensity adjustment
1/1/2014 Al
subsequent
of 1.3 percentage points above the 2010 adjustment,
years.
unless Secretary implements risk adjustment based on
MA diagnostic, cost, and use data.
1103
Savings from Limits on MA Plan
MA plans required to have a MLR of at least .85 or pay
1/1/2014 Al
subsequent
Administrative Costs.
a fee. Restrict enrollment after 3 years of MLR below
years.
.85; terminate after 5 years.
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap Discount
Medicare Part D enrollees in the coverage gap receive
1/1/2014 12/31/2014
Program for Brand-Name Drugs
a Medicare subsidy of 2.5% and a 50% manufacturer
and Closing the Medicare
discount on the cost of brand name drugs, and receive
Prescription Drug “Donut Hole.”
a Medicare subsidy of 28% of the cost of generic drugs;
growth of true out-of-pocket expenses reduced by
0.25%.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
HOPD: CY2014 update reduction of 0.3 percentage
1/1/2014 12/31/2014
Updates and Incorporation of
points.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do
Not Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
Board is required to submit its first proposal to the
1/15/2014 Al
subsequent
Board.
President and Congress if the projected Medicare per
years (subject
capita growth rate for the implementation year
to certain
exceeds the target growth rate for the implementation
conditions).
year. If the Medicare per capita growth rate does not
exceed the target growth rate, the Board is required
to submit an annual advisory report to Congress on
matters related to the Medicare program.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
If Board fails to submit proposal to Congress and the
1/25/2014 Each
Board.
President, Secretary submits contingent proposal.
subsequent
year (subject to
certain
conditions).
3131
10315
Payment Adjustments for Home
Secretary submits a report to Congress on HHA costs
3/1/2014
Health Care.
associated with providing ongoing access to care to
low-income Medicare beneficiaries or those in
medically underserved areas, among other things.
CRS-121
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2014
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
Secretary submits report to Congress on results of
3/1/2014 Al
subsequent
Board.
review of Board’s proposal (unless Secretary submits a
years (subject
proposal in that year). MedPAC submits comments to
to certain
Congress on Board's proposal or the Secretary's
conditions).
proposal.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
Deadline for specified Congressional Committees to
4/1/2014 Al
subsequent
Board.
consider the Board's proposal and report out
years (subject
legislative language implementing the
to certain
recommendations. Congress has the authority to
conditions).
develop its own proposal provided it meets the same
fiscal requirements as established for the Board.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
IPF: RY2015 update reduction of 0.3 percentage points. 7/1/2014
6/30/2015
Updates and Incorporation of
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do
Not Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
Deadline for the Board to produce a public report
7/1/2014 Al
subsequent
Board.
containing standardized information on system-wide
years.
health care costs, patient access to care, utilization, and
quality of care that allows for comparison by region,
types of services, types of providers, and both private
and public payers. Report is to be produced annual y
thereafter.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
Start date for the Secretary to begin implementing the
8/15/2014 Each
Board.
Board's proposal. Any recommendation that would
subsequent
change a provider's payment rate will apply to items
year (subject to
and services furnished on the first day of the first fiscal
certain
year, calendar year, or rate year (which varies
conditions).
depending on provider type) that begins after August
15.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based
Purchasing
1.5% penalty to base DRG payment amounts for
10/1/2014 9/30/2015
Program.
discharges from IPPS hospitals that do not provide high
quality care to Medicare beneficiaries as indicated by
their performance on certain measures.
CRS-122
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2014
PPACA
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3008
Payment Adjustment for Conditions IPPS hospitals in the top quartile of all IPPS hospitals as
10/1/2014 Al
subsequent
Acquired in Hospitals.
ranked by rates of HACs will have applicable payments
years.
reduced by 1.0%.
3025(a)
10309
Hospital Readmissions Reduction
The floor adjustment factor for hospital discharges is
10/1/2014 Al
subsequent
Program.
0.97 for FY2015 and beyond. The greater of the floor
years.
adjustment factor or the excess readmissions ratio will
be used to lower hospital discharge payments for
hospitals with excess readmissions.
3025(a)
10309
Hospital Readmissions Reduction
Secretary expands the number of applicable
10/1/2014 Al
subsequent
Program.
procedures or conditions that are part of the hospital
years.
readmissions reduction program.
3131
10315
Payment Adjustments for Home
Secretary transfers $500 million for FY2015 through
10/1/2014 9/30/2018
Health Care.
FY2018 for study and the home health care payment
adjustment demonstration.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
IPPS hospital: FY2015 and FY2016 update reduction of
10/1/2014 9/30/2016
Updates and Incorporation of
0.2 percentage points.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do
Not Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
IRF:FY2015 and FY2016 update reduction of 0.2
10/1/2014 9/30/2016
Updates and Incorporation of
percentage points.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do
Not Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
LTCH: RY2015 and RY2016 update reduction of 0.2
10/1/2014 9/30/2016
Updates and Incorporation of
percentage points.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do
Not Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
CRS-123
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Table C-7. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2015
2015
PPACA
Reconciliation
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Start or Effective
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Date or Deadline
Duration
3002
10327
Improvements to the Physician
For physicians who do not report quality measures 1/1/2015 12/31/2015
Quality Reporting System.
during this time, there is a penalty of 1.5% of
Medicare Part B allowed charges.
3007
Value-Based
Payment
Modifier Secretary to apply the payment modifier for items
1/1/2015 Al
subsequent
Under the Physician Fee Schedule.
and services furnished for specific physicians and
years.
groups of physicians the Secretary determines
appropriate.
10331
Public Reporting of Performance
The Secretary is required to submit to Congress a
1/1/2015
Information.
report on the Physician Compare Internet
website.
3131
10315
Payment Adjustments for Home
Taking into account the results of the study due
1/1/2015 12/31/2018
Health Care.
March 1, 2014, the Secretary may conduct a 4-
year demonstration testing whether HH payment
adjustments would improve access for patients
with high severity of illness or low income, or
underserved patients. The demonstration would
begin not later than this date.
3131
10315
Payment Adjustments for Home
MedPAC submits a report to Congress on
1/1/2015
Health Care.
implementation of home health payment rebasing
adjustments.
3201
10318 1102(e)
Medicare Advantage Payment.
Minimum required coding intensity adjustment of
1/1/2015 12/31/2015
0.25 percentage points above previous year's
adjustment, unless Secretary implements risk
adjustment based on MA diagnostic, cost, and use
data.
3210
Development of New Standards for
The National Association of Insurance
1/1/2015
Certain Medigap Plans.
Commissioners to create new model plans for
Medigap C and F. To the extent practicable, the
revised standards for benefit packages will be
implemented as of this date.
CRS-124
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2015
PPACA
Reconciliation
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Start or Effective
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Date or Deadline
Duration
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap Discount
Medicare Part D enrollees in the coverage gap
1/1/2015 12/31/2015
Program for Brand-Name Drugs and receive a Medicare subsidy of 5% and a 50%
Closing the Medicare Prescription
manufacturer discount on the cost of brand name
Drug “Donut Hole.”
drugs, and receive a Medicare subsidy of 35% of
the cost of generic drugs; growth of TrOOP
expenses reduced by 0.25%.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
HOPD: CY2015 and CY2016 update reduction of
1/1/2015 12/31/2016
Updates and Incorporation of
0.2 percentage points.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do
Not Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
HHA: implement productivity adjustment.
1/1/2015
Al subsequent
Updates and Incorporation of
years.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do
Not Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
Deadline for the Board to submit to Congress and
1/15/2015 At
least
once
Board.
the President advisory recommendations to slow
every 2 years
the rate of growth in NHE. These
thereafter.
recommendations could not target expenditures in
federal health care programs. Recommendations
are required at a minimum once every two years.
3113
Treatment of Certain Complex
Secretary to submit assessment report on the 2-
6/30/2015
Diagnostic Laboratory Tests.
year demonstration project (begun on July 1,
2011) and recommendations to Congress.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
IPF: RY2016 and RY2017 update reduction of 0.2
7/1/2015 6/30/2017
Updates and Incorporation of
percentage points.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do
Not Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
Due date for GAO report on changes to payment
7/1/2015 Periodical y
in
Board.
policies, methodologies, and rates resulting from
subsequent years.
the Board's recommendations.
CRS-125
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2015
PPACA
Reconciliation
End Date,
(P.L. 111-
PPACA
Act
Start or Effective
Frequency or
148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Date or Deadline
Duration
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based
Purchasing
1.75% penalty to base DRG payment amounts for
10/1/2015 9/30/2016
Program.
discharges from IPPS hospitals that do not provide
high quality care to Medicare beneficiaries as
indicated by their performance on certain
measures
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based
Purchasing
Interim report from GAO on VBP program is due
10/1/2015
Program.
to Congress.
Table C-8. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2016
2016
Reconciliation
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Start or Effective
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Date or Deadline
Duration
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based
Purchasing
HHS study on VBP program is due to Congress.
1/1/2016
Program.
3002
10327
Improvements to the Physician
Penalty of 2% of Part B charges for physicians
1/1/2016 Al
subsequent
Quality Reporting System.
who do not report quality measures.
years.
10326
Pilot Testing Pay-For-Performance
VBP pilot programs for IPFs, LTCHs, IRFs, IPPS
1/1/2016
Programs for Certain Medicare
exempt cancer hospitals, and hospice programs
Providers.
are implemented on a budget neutral basis.
Subject to certain certifications by OACT, the
Secretary would be able to expand the pilot
projects after 1/1/2018.
3023
10308
National Pilot Program on Payment
Secretary may expand the program after this
1/1/2016
Bundling.
date.
3201
10318
1102(e)
Medicare Advantage Payment.
Minimum required coding intensity adjustment of
1/1/2016 12/31/2016
0.25 percentage points above previous year's
adjustment, unless Secretary implements risk
adjustment based on MA diagnostic, cost, and
use data.
CRS-126
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2016
Reconciliation
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Start or Effective
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Date or Deadline
Duration
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap Discount
Medicare Part D enrollees in the coverage gap
1/1/2016 12/31/2016
Program for Brand-Name Drugs and
receive a Medicare subsidy of 5% and a 50%
Closing the Medicare Prescription
manufacturer discount on the cost of brand
Drug “Donut Hole.”
name drugs; and receive a Medicare subsidy of
42% of the cost of generic drugs, growth in true
out-of-pocket costs indexed to the lower of the
original annual percentage increase of drug
expenditures or CPI-Urban plus 2%.
6410(b)
Adjustments to the Medicare
Requires the Secretary to extend the
1/1/2016 Al
subsequent
Durable Medical Equipment,
Competitive Acquisition Program or apply
years.
Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies
competitively bid rates to remaining areas.
Competitive Acquisition Program.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based
Purchasing
HHS evaluation of VBP demonstration project
9/23/2016
Program.
for CAHs is due to Congress no later than 18
months from completion of the VBP
demonstration project in CAHs.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based
Purchasing
HHS evaluation of VBP demonstration project
9/23/2016
Program.
for small volume IPPS hospitals is due to
Congress no later than 18 months from
completion of those VBP demonstration
projects.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based
Purchasing
2.0% penalty to base DRG payment amounts for
10/1/2016 Al
subsequent
Program.
discharges from IPPS hospitals that do not
years.
provide high quality care to Medicare
beneficiaries as indicated by their performance
on certain measures.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
IPPS hospital: FY2017, FY2018, and FY2019
10/1/2016 9/30/2019
Updates and Incorporation of
update reduction of 0.75 percentage points.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
CRS-127
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2016
Reconciliation
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Start or Effective
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Date or Deadline
Duration
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
IRF: FY2017, FY2018, and FY2019 update
10/1/2016 9/30/2019
Updates and Incorporation of
reduction of 0.75 percentage points.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
LTCH: RY2017, FY2018, and RY2019 update
10/1/2016 9/30/2019
Updates and Incorporation of
reduction of 0.75 percentage points
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
Table C-9. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2017
2017
Reconciliation
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Start or Effective
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Date or Deadline
Duration
3007
Value-Based Payment Modifier Under
Secretary to apply the payment modifier for items
1/1/2017 Al
subsequent
the Physician Fee Schedule.
and services furnished for all physicians and groups
years.
of physicians.
3133 10316
1041
Improvement
to
Medicare Uses data from the Census Bureau as certified by
1/1/2017 Al
subsequent
Disproportionate Share Hospital
OACT for certain aspects of the formula for
years.
Payments.
hospitals' additional payments.
3201
10318
1102(e)
Medicare Advantage Payment.
Minimum required coding intensity adjustment of
1/1/2017 12/31/2017
0.25 percentage points above previous year's
adjustment, unless Secretary implements risk
adjustment based on MA diagnostic, cost, and use
data.
CRS-128
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
2017
Reconciliation
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Start or Effective
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Date or Deadline
Duration
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap Discount
Medicare Part D enrollees in the coverage gap
1/1/2017 12/31/2017
Program for Brand-Name Drugs and
receive a Medicare subsidy of 10% and a 50%
Closing the Medicare Prescription
manufacturer discount on the cost of brand name
Drug “Donut Hole.”
drugs; and receive a Medicare subsidy of 49% of the
cost of generic drugs, growth in true out-of-pocket
costs indexed to the lower of the original annual
percentage increase of drug expenditures or CPI-
Urban plus 2%.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
HOPD: CY2017, CY2018, and CY2019 update
1/1/2017 12/31/2019
Updates and Incorporation of
reduction of 0.75 percentage points.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory Board. Deadline for Congress to introduce a joint
2/1/2017
resolution discontinuing the Board's activities.
3001 10335
Hospital
Value-Based
Purchasing
Final report from GAO on VBP program is due to
7/1/2017
Program.
Congress.
3401
10319
1105
Revision of Certain Market Basket
IPF: RY2018, RY2019, and RY2020 update
7/1/2017 6/30/2020
Updates and Incorporation of
reduction of 0.75 percentage points.
Productivity Improvements into
Market Basket Updates That Do Not
Already Incorporate Such
Improvements.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory Board. Deadline for Congress to enact a joint resolution
8/15/2017
discontinuing the Board's activities.
CRS-129
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Table C-10. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2018
2018
Reconciliation
End Date,
PPACA PPACA
Act
Start or Effective
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Date or Deadline
Duration
3201
10318 1102(e)
Medicare Advantage Payment.
Minimum required coding intensity adjustment of
1/1/2018 12/31/2018
0.25 percentage points above previous year’s
adjustment, unless Secretary implements risk
adjustment based on MA diagnostic, cost, and use
data.
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap Discount Medicare Part D enrollees in the coverage gap
1/1/2018 12/31/2018
Program for Brand-Name Drugs
receive a Medicare subsidy of 15% and a 50%
and Closing the Medicare
manufacturer discount on the cost of brand name
Prescription Drug “Donut Hole.”
drugs; and receive a Medicare subsidy of 56% of the
cost of generic drugs, growth in true out-of-pocket
costs indexed to the lower of the original annual
percentage increase of drug expenditures or CPI-
Urban plus 2%.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
Board is only required to submit proposals to the
1/15/2018 Al
subsequent
Board.
President and Congress for years in which the
years.
projected rate of growth in Medicare spending
exceeds the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) plus
1.0%.
6301 10602
Patient-Centered
Outcomes
CG review of the adequacy and use of the funding
3/23/2018
Research.
for the Institute.
CRS-130
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Table C-11. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2019
2019
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
3201
10318
1102(e)
Medicare Advantage Payment.
Minimum required coding intensity adjustment of not
1/1/2019 Al
subsequent
less than 5.7 percent.
years.
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap Discount
Medicare Part D enrollees in the coverage gap receive a 1/1/2019 12/31/2019
Program for Brand-Name Drugs
Medicare subsidy of 20% and a 50% manufacturer
and Closing the Medicare
discount on the cost of brand name drugs; and receive
Prescription Drug “Donut Hole.”
a Medicare subsidy of 63% of the cost of generic drugs,
growth in true out-of-pocket costs indexed to the
lower of the original annual percentage increase of drug
expenditures or CPI-Urban plus 2%.
3403
10320
Independent Payment Advisory
The first year the Board may begin submitting proposals 1/15/2019 Al
subsequent
Board.
that may reduce payments to providers and suppliers
years.
scheduled to receive a reduction in their payment
updates in excess of a reduction due to productivity.
These proposals would take effect in 2020.
Table C-12. Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline—CY2020
2020
Start or
Reconciliation
Effective
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Date or
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
Deadline
Duration
3301
1101
Medicare Coverage Gap Discount
Medicare Part D enrollees in the coverage gap receive a 1/1/2020 Al
subsequent
Program for Brand-Name Drugs and
Medicare subsidy of 25% and a 50% manufacturer
years.
Closing the Medicare Prescription
discount on the cost of brand name drugs, and receive a
Drug “Donut Hole.”
Medicare subsidy of 75% of the cost of generic drugs;
true out-of-pocket costs determined as if the 2014-
2019 adjustments had not been made.
CRS-131
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Table C-13. Unspecified Start Date, Effective Date, or Deadline
Unspecified
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
6301
10602
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
Methodology Committee to submit (1) methodological
18 months after
standards and (2) translation table for guidance to the
establishment of
PCORI Board.
the Institute.
3023
10308
National Pilot Program on Payment
Secretary submits interim report to Congress.
Not later than 2
Bundling.
years after
implementation
of pilot project.
3023
10308
National Pilot Program on Payment
Secretary submits final report to Congress.
Not later than 3
Bundling.
years after
implementation
of pilot project.
3111
Payment for Bone Density Tests.
Secretary to arrange with the IOM to study and report to
Report due as
the Secretary and Congress on the ramifications of
provided in
Medicare reimbursement reductions for DXA on
agreement
beneficiary access to bone mass measurement benefits.
between
Secretary and
IOM.
6005
Pharmacy
Benefit
Managers
Pharmacy Benefit Managers that contract with Part D
To be
Transparency Requirements.
drug plans or qualified health plans must share certain
determined by
financial information with the Secretary of HHS, the plans
the Secretary.
the PBMs contract with through Medicare Part D, or the
exchanges in a manner, form and timeframe specified by
the Secretary.
3024
Independence at Home Demonstration
Secretary submits a final report to Congress with an
Unspecified.
Program.
analysis of the demonstration project on coordination of
care, expenditures, access to care, and quality of care.
3140
Medicare Hospice Concurrent Care
Secretary conducts a 3-year demonstration to al ow
Unspecified.
Demonstration Program.
hospice patients to receive all other Medicare covered
services.
3140
Medicare Hospice Concurrent Care
Secretary conducts independent evaluation of the
Unspecified.
Demonstration Program.
demonstration program and submits report to Congress
containing the results of the evaluation.
3311
Improved Medicare Prescription Drug
The Secretary must submit annual reports on the
Unspecified. Al
subsequent
Plan and MA-PD Complaint System.
complaint system regarding Part D plans or their
years.
sponsors.
CRS-132
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Unspecified
Reconciliation
Start or
End Date,
PPACA
PPACA
Act
Effective Date
Frequency or
(P.L. 111-148)
Title 10
(P.L. 111-152)
Provision Title
Description
or Deadline
Duration
6301
10602
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
PCORI incorporated.
Unspecified.
6301
10602
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
CG appoints 15 methodology committee members.
Unspecified.
6301
10602
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
Methodology Committee report to PCORI Board. PCORI Unspecified.
annual report to Congress and the President.
6301
10602
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
Contract for annual financial audit of the PCORI.
Unspecified.
6301
10602
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
CG review of the annual financial audits of the PCORI.
Unspecified.
Al subsequent
years.
6301
10602
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
CG review of the processes of the PCORI for objectivity
Unspecified. Every
5
years.
and credibility.
6301
10602
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
CG review of the dissemination and training activities and
Unspecified. Every
5
years.
data networks established by the PCORI.
6301
10602
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
CG review of the overal effectiveness of activities of the
Unspecified. Every
5
years.
PCORI.
10323
Medicare Coverage for Individuals
The Secretary is required to establish a pilot program,
Unspecified.
Exposed to Environmental Health
with appropriate reimbursement methodologies, to
Hazards.
provide comprehensive, coordinated, and cost-effective
care to certain individuals who enroll in Part B and who
are diagnosed with an illness caused by an environmental
hazard to which an EPA emergency declaration applies.
6301
10602
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research.
CG annual report to Congress on results of reviews done April 1, first
Al subsequent
that year. Due April 1st of each year (does not specify
year unspecified years.
year of first due date).
CRS-133
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Appendix D. List of Acronyms
ACO Accountable
Care
Organization
ASC Ambulatory
Surgery
Center
ASP
Average Sales Price
CY Calendar
Year
CAH
Critical Access Hospital
CG
Comptroller General (of the Government Accountability Office)
CHIP
State Children’s Health Insurance Program
CMI
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation
CMP Civil
Monetary
Penalty
CMS
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
DGME
Direct Graduate Medical Education
DOD
Department of Defense
DRG
Diagnostic Related Group
DSH
Disproportionate Share Hospital
DXA
Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
E&M Evaluation
and
Management
FFS Fee-for-Service
FQHC
Federally Qualified Health Center
FY Fiscal
Year
GAO
Government Accountability Office
GPCI
Geographic Practice Cost Indices
HAC
Hospital Acquired Condition
HHA
Home Health Agency
HHRG
Home Health Resource Group
HHS
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
HIPD
Healthcare Integrity and Protection Data Bank
HOPD
Hospital Outpatient Department
IDR
Integrated Data Repository
IHS Indian
Health
Services
IME Indirect
Medical
Education
IOM Institute
of
Medicine
IPF
Inpatient Psychiatric Facility
IPPS
Inpatient Prospective Payment System
IRF
Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility
LIS
Low Income Subsidy
Congressional Research Service
134
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
LTCH
Long Term Care Hospital
MA Medicare
Advantage
MA-PDP
Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan
MDH Medicare
Dependent
Hospital
MedPAC
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
MGCRB
Medicare Geographic Classification Review Board
MIF Medicare
Improvement
Fund
MIPPA
Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (P.L. 110-275; enacted
July 15, 2008)
MTM Medication
Therapy
Management
NPDB
National Practitioner Data Bank
OACT
Office of the Actuary of CMS
OIG
Office of Inspector General of HHS
PBM Pharmacy
Benefit
Manager
PCOR
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
PCORI
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
PCORTF
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Trust Fund
PE GPCI
Practice Expense Geographic Practice Cost Indices
PFFS
Private Fee for Service
PPS
Prospective Payment System
PQRI
Physician Quality Reporting Initiative
RAC Recovery
Audit
Contractors
RY Rate
Year
SCH Sole
Community
Hospital
Secretary
Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services
SNF
Skilled Nursing Facility
SNP Special
Needs
Plans
SRDP Self-Referral
Disclosure
Protocol
USC
United States Code
VA
Departments of Veterans Affairs
VBP Value-Based
Purchasing
Congressional Research Service
135
Medicare Provisions in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Author Contact Information
Patricia A. Davis, Coordinator
Paulette C. Morgan
Specialist in Health Care Financing
Specialist in Health Care Financing
pdavis@crs.loc.gov, 7-7362
pcmorgan@crs.loc.gov, 7-7317
Jim Hahn
Julie Stone
Analyst in Health Care Financing
Specialist in Health Care Financing
jhahn@crs.loc.gov, 7-4914
jstone@crs.loc.gov, 7-1386
Geoffrey J. Hoffman
Sibyl Tilson
Analyst in Health Care Financing
Specialist in Health Care Financing
ghoffman@crs.loc.gov, 7-0152
stilson@crs.loc.gov, 7-7368
Acknowledgments
Cliff Binder, Christopher Davis, Sarah Lister, Janemarie Mulvey, Kirsten Colello, Amanda Sarata, Jennifer
Staman, and Holly Stockdale also contributed to this report.
Congressional Research Service
136