Congressionally Designated Special Management Areas in the National Forest System

June 11, 2010 (R41285)

Contents

Tables

Appendixes

Summary

In 1891, Congress authorized the President to reserve public forests to protect the lands and resources. The many presidential proclamations and subsequent land purchases have led to the current National Forest System. These lands are managed to balance the many purposes and values through an interdisciplinary planning process, with public involvement, under the Multiple Use-Sustained Yield Act of 1960 and the National Forest Management Act of 1976.

Congress has also designated many specific national forest areas to emphasize particular values or resources, and continues to consider legislation to designate additional specially managed areas within the national forests. Congress has established two land management systems for which statutory guidelines generally apply to all areas in the system. The National Wilderness Preservation System has many units, with general management guidelines: no permanent roads or structures; no commercial enterprises; and no motorized or mechanical access. However, the 1964 Wilderness Act that created the Wilderness System and many subsequent wilderness statutes have also included numerous exceptions to these standards for specific areas. The other system is the Wild and Scenic Rivers System, with general management direction for the corridors identified along designated rivers.

In addition, Congress has designated at least 96 individual areas within the National Forest System, and continues to consider more such designations. The Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, for example, designated 10 individual special areas among its many provisions. While many of the designations are unique, the areas can generally be grouped into six categories: national monuments (5, plus one administrative designation); recreation areas (26); scenic areas (11); game refuges (6); protection areas (37); and other (11).

While the statutes designating these 96 areas differ, many provisions are found in multiple statutes. Common administrative provisions include findings of the importance and uniqueness of the area; purposes for administration of the area; designation of the area, often with references to maps and boundaries; applicable law, with most making the provisions supplemental to the management guidance for national forests generally; a management plan for the area; an advisory committee for the area or the plan; authorization of land acquisition; and withdrawal of the area from the public land laws. Less common administrative provisions include requiring regulations for the area; explicitly allowing inholder access; prohibiting buffer zones around the area; retaining most state and local governance provisions; and authorizing appropriations.

There are also three common resource management provisions in the many statutes designating special areas: withdrawal of the area from mining and mineral leasing laws, subject to valid existing rights; timber harvesting restrictions, often with exemptions for fire, insect, or disease control; and fish and wildlife management, generally preserving state responsibilities and jurisdiction, allowing fishing and hunting, and authorizing area or period closures for various purposes, in consultation with state officials. Less common resource management provisions include limitations on motorized access; authority for fire, insect, and disease control actions; permission to continue livestock grazing; authority for low-level military overflights; and directions on water use and water rights.


Congressionally Designated Special Management Areas in the National Forest System

In 1891, Congress authorized the President to reserve existing public forestlands to protect and preserve the lands and resources. Presidential proclamations of forest reserves (now called national forests), subsequent land purchases, and other congressional authorizations have led to the current National Forest System (NFS)—193 million acres of federal lands in 155 national forests, 20 national grasslands, and numerous other units (land utilization projects, purchase units, research and experimental areas, and more). These lands are generally administered by the Forest Service, in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, for many uses, including timber production, livestock grazing, and many types of recreation. Acceptable levels and locations of various uses are determined with public involvement in a land management planning process.

Congress has also designated specific national forest areas to emphasize particular resources or values. Some types of designations, such as wilderness areas, have statutory guidelines that apply to all designated areas, as well as some site-specific directions. Many other designations, with a variety of titles, are administered under the area-specific guidance enacted when the area was designated.

Congress continues to consider legislation to designate specific national forest areas for particular purposes. For example, the Omnibus Public Lands Management Act of 2009 (P.L. 111-11) designated 20 new national forest wilderness areas, added lands to 20 existing national forest wilderness areas, designated at least nine wild and scenic rivers through national forests, designated two new national scenic areas and one new national recreation area in national forests, and designated seven other areas in national forests with special management provisions.1

Additional legislation to designate wilderness and other special areas within the NFS has been introduced.2 For both enacted and pending legislation, designations differ in the nature of the provisions included and in the level of detail provided. Following a brief overview of NFS management generally, this report summarizes the management provisions for the two major systems and then for the individual areas with statutory guidelines only for each designated area. The Appendix provides a list of all 97 specially designated individual areas, with a summary of each enacted management provision.

Management of the National Forest System

In 1891, Congress authorized the President to proclaim forest reserves from existing federal lands.3 Six years later, in what has become known at the Forest Service Organic Administration Act, Congress defined the purposes of the reserves: "No public forest reservation shall be established, except to improve and protect the forest within the reservation, or for the purpose of securing favorable conditions of water flows, and to furnish a continuous supply of timber for the use and necessities of citizens of the United States ..."4

Initially the reserves were administered by the Forestry Division of the General Land Office, within the Department of the Interior. In 1905, the 75 million acres of forest reserves (renamed national forests in 1907) 5 were transferred to the Department of Agriculture;6 the Forestry Division was merged with the existing USDA Bureau of Forestry (whose purpose was to conduct forestry research and to provide assistance to forestland owners) to create a new agency: the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) in the Department of Agriculture. President Theodore Roosevelt increased the acreage of national forests to 172 million acres by 1909. The National Forest System (NFS) has continued to expand slowly, to 193 million acres in 2010.

Multiple-Use Management

The original NFS management goals in the Organic Administration Act were to improve and protect the forest, secure favorable water flows, and furnish timber for citizens. Congress expanded theses goals in the Multiple Use-Sustained Yield Act of 1960 (MUSYA).7 Section 1 of MUSYA directs that the national forests "shall be administered for outdoor recreation, range, timber, watershed, and wildlife and fish purposes." Section 2 requires that the surface resources be developed and administered for "multiple use and sustained yield," considering the relative values of the various resources, and notes that creating and managing areas of wilderness is consistent with the purposes of the act.

Section 4(a) of MUSYA defines multiple-use management of national forest resources. It directs management to best meet the needs of the American people, with adjustments to changing needs and conditions. Multiple-use management also permits some land to be used for only one or a few resources. Finally, multiple-use management must maintain the productivity of the lands. Thus, MUSYA directs that national forest management balance recreation, timber, grazing, water, and wildlife, as desired by the American people, while sustaining productivity.

Land and Resource Management Planning

Planning for NFS use and management is guided by the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA).8 NFMA requires comprehensive land and resource management plans for each unit of the NFS,9 to be amended as needed and revised periodically but at least every 15 years. The planning requires an interdisciplinary approach combining "physical, biological, economic, and other sciences," directs that the plans provide for multiple use in accordance with MUSYA, and requires public participation in developing, reviewing, and revising the plans.

In Section 6 (16 U.S.C. § 1604), NFMA established numerous requirements and considerations for the planning process. Some provisions were particularly controversial, because of their potential to reduce or otherwise constrain timber harvesting. The more controversial provisions include:

Two of these provisions—Section 6(g)(3)(E) and Section 6(k)—were intended to constrain timber harvesting by establishing biophysical and economic requirements, respectively, for timber production. The NEPA provision—Section 6(g)(1)—establishes a procedural requirement that can be, and has been, used to delay or prevent timber harvesting and other development activities in the national forests. The biological diversity provision—Section 6(g)(3)(B)—has perhaps had the most significant impact, however. The 1979 and 1982 regulations to implement this provision required the USFS to maintain viable populations of all native and desirable non-native species. This requirement for viable populations was the initial basis for the litigation that reduced USFS (and BLM) timber harvesting in the Pacific Northwest by 90% or more to maintain the northern spotted owl. (The subsequent listing of the owl under the Endangered Species Act11 provided further impetus to reduce timber harvesting to preserve northern spotted owl habitat.)

In addition to the controversial provisions of NFMA, efforts to revise the 1982 implementing regulations have been controversial. In November 2000, the Clinton Administration finalized new rules (to be phased in) that emphasized planning for the biological sustainability of the national forests. The Bush Administration delayed implementing the Clinton rules, then replaced them in January 2005 before they went into effect. The final Bush rules were to balance biological and socioeconomic sustainability, to make fewer decisions nationally by reducing regulatory guidelines, and to exempt plans from NEPA and ESA, because the Bush Administration viewed plans as guides to decision-making that would not include site-specific decisions. The Bush planning rules were successfully challenged.12 In 2007, the USFS reissued the Bush rules as a proposed rule with a draft NEPA environmental impact statement and ESA consultation to meet court requirements. The final planning rules were issued in April 2008, and were invalidated by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in June 2009 for failing to comply with NEPA and ESA.13 In December 2009, the Obama Administration announced its intent to develop new NFMA planning regulations.14

Systems of Special Management Areas

Congress has at times seen fit to alter the general NFS management guidance for particular areas. These areas are commonly designated to emphasize particular resources or values, such as recreation or wildlife, sometimes with detailed congressional guidance for the areas.15

As part of its special area designations for some NFS lands, Congress has established two systems of special management areas, with general guidance that applies to all such designated areas: the National Wilderness Preservation System and the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.16 These two systems include lands administered by other federal land management agencies, as well as NFS lands, and the general guidance for the designated systems apply to all designated areas.

National Wilderness Preservation System17

In 1964, the Wilderness Act18 created the National Wilderness Preservation System, initially with 54 areas (totaling 9.1 million acres) that the USFS had previously established administratively as wilderness or wild areas.19 The act also reserved to Congress the right to expand the Wilderness System. Today, the Wilderness System contains 759 wilderness areas totaling nearly 110 million acres in 44 states. Of these, 441 areas with 36.2 million acres (33% of the total) are in the NFS. (See Table 1.) The remaining wilderness areas are administered by the National Park Service, the Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Bureau of Land Management.

The Wilderness Act established general objectives and standards for areas to be included in the Wilderness System. Section 2(c) defines wilderness.

A wilderness, in contrast with those areas where man and his own works dominate the landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this Act an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvements or human habitation, which is protected and managed so as to preserve its natural conditions and which (1) generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticeable; (2) has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation; (3) has at least five thousand acres of land or is of sufficient size as to make practicable its preservation and use in an unimpaired condition; and (4) may also contain ecological, geological, or other features of scientific, educational, scenic, or historical value. (16 U.S.C. §1131(c))

Table 1. Wilderness Areas in the National Forest System

State

No.

Acreage

 

State

No.

Acreage

Alabama

3

41,367

 

Nevada

21

1,087,624

Alaska

19

5,753,889

 

New Hampshire

5

138,418

Arizona

36

1,345,008

 

New Mexico

16

1,387,498

Arkansas

10

116,578

 

North Carolina

11

102,634

California

64

5,075,290

 

Oklahoma

2

14,543

Colorado

36

3,140,120

 

Oregon

41

2,228,103

Florida

7

74,495

 

Pennsylvania

2

9,002

Georgia

10

114,537

 

Puerto Rico

1

10,000

Idaho

5

3,961,864

 

South Carolina

5

16,671

Illinois

7

28,063

 

South Dakota

1

13,426

Indiana

1

12,463

 

Tennessee

11

66,349

Kentucky

2

18,132

 

Texas

5

38,483

Louisiana

1

8,679

 

Utah

14

775,537

Maine

1

11,232

 

Vermont

8

100,870

Michigan

10

89,529

 

Virginia

23

135,325

Minnesota

1

807,853

 

Washington

25

2,715,056

Mississippi

1

6,046

 

West Virginia

9

118,810

Missouri

7

64,119

 

Wisconsin

5

46,414

Montana

12

3,372,525

 

Wyoming

15

3,111,232

Nebraska

1

7,794

 

USFS Total

441a

36,165,579

Source: USDA Forest Service, Land Areas of the National Forest System, as of Sept. 30, 2009, Tables 7, 8, and 9, http://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar/2009/lar09index.html.

a. The total is less than the sum of areas by state, because 13 designated wilderness areas cross state boundaries.

Wilderness Management Guidelines20

In addition to the objectives and standards for areas to be designated as wilderness, the Wilderness Act established standards and guidelines for managing designated wilderness areas.21 In general, each agency administering wilderness areas is to preserve and protect the wilderness character of the areas under its jurisdiction.

To achieve these objectives, Section 4(c) of the Wilderness Act generally prohibits commercial activities; roads, structures, and other infrastructure; and motorized and mechanical access. Specifically, the act states:

Except as specifically provided for in this Act, and subject to existing private rights, there shall be no commercial enterprise and no permanent road within any wilderness area designated by this Act and, except as necessary to meet minimum requirements for the administration of the area for the purpose of this Act (including measures required in emergencies involving the health and safety of persons within the area), there shall be no temporary road, no use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment or motorboats, no landing of aircraft, no other form of mechanical transport, and no structure or installation within any such area.

Thus, this section prohibits commercial uses, such as timber harvesting. It bars motorized and mechanical access, such as via cars and trucks, bicycles and motorbikes, off-road and all-terrain vehicles, motorboats, and all aircraft. It also prevents construction and maintenance of temporary and permanent roads and structures, such as shelters, water impoundments, fire towers, and communication equipment.

Wilderness Management Exceptions

The Wilderness Act and subsequent statutes designating wilderness areas have included numerous exceptions to the prohibitions described above. In particular, Section 4(d) of the Wilderness Act provides for several specific exceptions:

Many of the 117 laws designating wilderness areas that have been enacted since 1964 also have exceptions to the no-commerce, no-structures, no-motorized access strictures of the Wilderness Act. Six general types of provisions in many wilderness statutes provide exceptions to the general wilderness management restrictions.22

National Wild and Scenic Rivers System

The National Wild and Scenic Rivers System was established in the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968.24 The act established a policy of preserving designated free-flowing rivers and their immediate environments "for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations." Rivers are generally added to the system by an act of Congress, although states can nominate, and the Secretary of the Interior can approve, rivers protected under state law and managed by a state agency. The Rivers System includes three classes of rivers—wild, scenic, and recreational—depending on the extent and nature of development along the river segment.

The administering agency establishes boundaries for the designated river's corridor, averaging not more than a half-mile in width (including the river and adjacent shoreline). Management of the lands within the corridor depends, in part, on the river's classification; developmental activities are most restricted along wild rivers and least restricted along recreational rivers. Administration is to emphasize the values that led to the designation, and uses are generally restricted only if they harm those values. Section 10(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act states:

Each component of the national wild and scenic rivers system shall be administered in such a manner as to protect and enhance the values which caused it to be included in said system without, insofar as is consistent therewith, limiting other uses that do not substantially interfere with public use and enjoyment of these values. In such administration primary emphasis shall be given to protecting its esthetic, scenic, historic, archaeologic, and scientific features.

Thus, the USFS is to manage the national forest lands within the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System under MUSYA and NFMA, as long as the activities are consistent with protecting the wild, scenic, or recreational nature of the designated rivers. Table 2 shows the area of wild and scenic river corridors within the National Forest System in each state with one or more designated rivers.

Table 2.Wild and Scenic River Corridors in the National Forest System

State

No.a

Acreage

 

State

No.a

Acreage

Alabama

1

8,780

 

Missouri

1

8,978

Arizona

2

16,937

 

Montana

1

40,627

Arkansas

8

34,364

 

New Hampshire

1

1,049

California

21

309,956

 

New Mexico

4

16,133

Colorado

1

15,141

 

North Carolina

3

5,616

Georgia

1

6,786

 

Oregon

45

326,856

Idaho

6

174,596

 

Pennsylvania

2

8,221

Kentucky

1

3,880

 

Puerto Rico

3

2,848

Louisiana

1

5,150

 

South Carolina

1

7,041

Michigan

15

125,410

 

Washington

3

28,282

Mississippi

1

4,599

 

Wyoming

2

107,481

 

 

 

 

USFS Totalb

124

1,258,731

Source: USDA Forest Service, Land Areas of the National Forest System, as of Sept. 30, 2009, Tables 7, 8, and 9, http://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar/2009/lar09index.html.

a. Includes the number of rivers regardless of designation; for example, the Verde River (AZ) has a segment designated as a wild river and another segment designated as a scenic river, but this is counted as one river in this report.

b. The total is less than the sum of rivers by state, because two designated wild and scenic rivers occur in more than one state.

Individual Special Management Areas

In addition to the two standardized systems of special management areas, Congress has designated numerous individual special management areas (SMAs) with management guidelines for each area. Six major types of designations have been enacted: national monuments, recreation areas, scenic areas, game refuges,25 protection areas, and other. These areas differ from the two standardized systems (wilderness and wild and scenic river corridors) in having neither general authorizing legislation for the type of designation nor general management direction for all such areas. Rather, each SMA has been created by an act of Congress with its own management guidelines and restrictions. Furthermore, there are no obvious differences in the guidelines and restrictions for the different types of designations. Table 3 shows the number of areas for each of the major types of SMAs, and the total area designated. The Appendix provides a complete list of the 97 SMAs designated to date, with a quotation or summary of the major provisions enacted for each.

Table 3. Special Management Areas in the National Forest System

Designation

No.

Acreagea

National monuments

6

2,827,634

Recreation areas

26

3,199,000

Scenic areas

11

324,853b

Game refuges

6

884,452c

Protection areas

37

1,059,716d

Other designations

11

277,451e

Total

97

9,573,106

Source: Appendix and USDA Forest Service, Land Areas of the National Forest System, as of Sept. 30, 2009, Tables 11, 12, 15-20, and 22-26, http://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar/2009/lar09index.html.

a. Acreage as reported in Land Areas of the National Forest System, where available.

b. Excludes two areas for which acreage is not reported in statute or in Land Areas of the National Forest System.

c. Excludes six areas with 240,932 acres proclaimed by the President.

d. Excludes seven areas for which acreage is not reported in statute or in Land Areas of the National Forest System.

e. Excludes four areas for which acreage is not reported in statute or in Land Areas of the National Forest System.

Numerous provisions have been used commonly in many of the statutes designating SMAs. The common provisions can be grouped into administrative provisions and resource management provisions. In addition, some provisions have been used in a few of the SMA statutes, and can similarly be grouped into administrative and resource management provisions.

Common Administrative Provisions

Eight types of administrative provisions have commonly been enacted for SMAs in the National Forest System. The details of the language used often differs, especially for the first two types of provisions, but the intent and effect is usually quite similar.

1. Findings. Many SMA statutes include findings about the unique attributes of the area being designated.

2. Purpose. Most SMA statutes include a statement about the purpose(s) for designating the area. Such statements often provide a basis for management that may differ from management of the area prior to designation.

3. Designation. Many SMA statutes include a provision explicitly designating and naming the area. These provisions often include a reference to the area's boundaries and to a map (commonly identified by a name and date) to be retained in a specific office (typically the Forest Supervisor's office for the national forest in which the SMA is located).

4. NFS Laws. Most SMA statutes direct that the SMA is to be managed consistent with the laws, rules, and regulations generally applicable to National Forest System lands. Thus, the purposes and provisions enacted for the designated area are generally supplemental to existing governance, and not a substitute for that management guidance.

5. Management Plan. Many SMA statutes require a management plan for the designated area, commonly completed within a specified period. Sometimes the planning guidance requires public participation; sometimes it does so indirectly, by reference to the NFMA planning process and requirements.

6. Advisory Committee. Many SMA statutes provide for an advisory committee or group for the designated area. This advisory committee is frequently permanent, but sometimes is just for the development of the management plan. Also, some advisory groups are to represent the array of general public interests, but others are to focus on scientific issues associated with management of the area.

7. Land Acquisition. Most SMA statutes authorize land acquisition for nonfederal land within the boundaries of the area. As the USFS has general land acquisition authority under the Weeks Law (16 U.S.C. § 515 et al.) and the SMAs are within the NFS, such land acquisition authority might be redundant.

8. Withdrawal. Many of the SMA statutes withdraw the lands of the designated area from access under public land laws, such as the Homestead Act. As most of the public land laws were repealed in the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA)26 and are no longer applicable to NFS or other federal lands, the more recent SMA statutes are less likely to include such a provision.

Common Resource Management Provisions

Three resource provisions have been included in many of the statutes designating SMAs in the NFS. These provisions generally address management of, and access to, minerals, timber, and fish and wildlife.

1. Minerals. Most SMA statutes withdraw the designated lands from access under the mining and the mineral and geothermal leasing laws, subject to valid existing rights. This is very similar to the provisions of the Wilderness Act for withdrawing lands from access for mineral exploration and development. Some statutes authorize the USFS to continue to sell mineral materials (sand and gravel) from within the designated area.

2. Timber. Many SMA statutes restrict timber harvesting. The most common approach is to use the restrictions of the Wilderness Act: no commercial timber harvesting, except as needed for fire, insect, and disease control and for visitor and administrative safety. Other approaches include requiring uneven-aged management practices,27 directing that harvesting be adjusted for possible scenic impacts, or limiting the size or species of trees that can be cut and removed.

3. Fish and Wildlife. Most of the statutes designating SMAs include provisions relating to fish and wildlife management. In general, the statutes explicitly retain state jurisdiction over the management of the animals, limiting federal SMA administration to habitat management. Many of the statutes also explicitly allow hunting and fishing, and sometimes trapping, consistent with state law. These provisions also typically allow seasonal and/or area closures to protect critical wildlife needs (e.g., elk calving grounds), usually in consultation with the relevant state agency.

Less Common Administrative Provisions

Several additional administrative provisions have been enacted in at least a few statutes designating SMAs.

1. Regulations. Several SMA statutes direct that the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, promulgate regulations for administering the designated area.

2. Inholder Access. Some SMA statutes explicitly allow access for nonfederal landowners whose lands are within the designated SMA. In some instances, the language parallels the Wilderness Act, allowing "reasonable" rights of access.

3. Buffer Zones. Some of the statutes designating SMAs prohibit the USFS from establishing buffer zones around the SMA. This provision is akin to provisions enacted in several statutes designating wilderness areas, which note that the ability to see or hear a nonconforming activity from within the wilderness is not sufficient authority to restrict or prohibit that activity.

4. Effect on Governance. Several SMA statutes direct that the designation is to have no effect on state or local laws and regulations, including law enforcement and taxation of private enterprise within the SMA.

5. Authorization of Appropriations. Some SMA statutes explicitly authorize appropriations for administering the area consistent with the statute. However, since few, if any, SMA statutes authorize any activity not already authorized for NFS lands generally (typically they restrict already-authorized activities), and since USFS appropriations are enacted for activities, not for specific units, it is not clear that an authorization is required for an SMA.

Less Common Resource Management Provisions

In addition to administrative provisions, several of the statutes designating SMAs have included additional provisions governing natural resource management within the SMA.

1. Motorized Access. Several SMA statutes prohibit motorized access in the area, except on existing roads and other routes designated for motorized access. In addition, some of the statutes also prohibit the construction of new roads within the SMA. Exceptions to this prohibition have been included for new roads to replace existing, environmentally damaging roads and for new roads as decided in the planning process for the area.

2. Wildfire, Insect, and Disease Control. Some SMA statutes explicitly allow activities to control fires, insects, and diseases. In general, these provisions use the same language as the Wilderness Act—necessary measures subject to reasonable restrictions as determined by the Secretary.

3. Livestock Grazing. Some of the statutes designating SMAs explicitly allow livestock grazing to continue where it existed prior to the designation. Motorized access, even in areas where such access is generally prohibited, is generally permitted, consistent with historic use. The provisions, when enacted, are commonly similar in intent to the provisions in the Wilderness Act.

4. Military Overflights. Some SMA statutes explicitly direct that the designation is not to prohibit or otherwise affect low-level military training overflights of the SMA. Again, the language is generally the same as is used in the several statutes designating wilderness areas.

5. Water Use/Water Rights. A few statutes designating SMAs specifically address water use and water rights associated with the area. These provisions are more difficult to summarize, as they are more variable than many of the other provisions, ranging from those that stipulate no effect on water rights and water use, to an explicit reservation of water as needed for the SMA, to an explicit denial of water rights for the SMA.

Appendix. Individual Congressionally Designated Areas in the National Forest System

This appendix lists the 97 specially designated individual areas, grouped into six major types of designations: national monuments; recreation areas; scenic areas; game refuges; protection areas; and other. The areas are listed chronologically for each type of designation. For each area, the entry displays the statute designating the area and the length of its statutory provisions; the length cited for each is the number of pages in the U.S. Code Congressional and Administrative News, by West Publishing Co. (St. Paul, MN), or in the free-standing slip law produced by the U.S. Government Printing Office, except as otherwise noted.28 Each entry then identifies the management purposes, provisions, requirements, and prohibitions with quotations or brief CRS annotations.

National Monuments

Four national monuments and two national volcanic monuments have been established within the National Forest System.29 Five have been designated by acts of Congress; one was established by presidential proclamation under the Antiquities Act of 1906 (16 U.S.C. §§ 431 et seq.).30 No conclusions can be drawn about the general management guidance for these areas, or the differences compared to recreation or scenic areas. The sizes of the national monuments vary widely, from about 55,000 acres for the Newberry National Volcanic Monument to nearly 2.3 million for the Misty Fjords National Monument.

1 & 2. Misty Fjords National Monument and Admiralty Island National Monument (AK)—P.L. 96-487, Alaska National Interests Lands Conservation Act of 1980 (ANILCA); 13 pages.

3. Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument (WA)—P.L. 97-243; 8+ pages.

4. Newberry National Volcanic Monument (OR)—P.L. 101-522; 8+ pages.

5. Giant Sequoia National Monument (CA)—Proclamation 7295 of April 15, 2000, under the authority of the Antiquities Act of 1906 (16 U.S.C. §431 et seq.); 4+ pages in 65 Fed. Reg. 24095, 4/25/2000).

Recreation Areas

Congress has designated 26 recreational areas within the National Forest System, each with distinct management direction enacted in the law establishing the area. Most have been named national recreation areas, although two are recreation areas, one is a recreational area, one is a scenic recreation area, and one is a winter recreation area. The rationale for these distinctions is not apparent. Also, no conclusions can be drawn about the general management guidance for these areas, or the differences compared to national monuments or scenic areas. The sizes of the recreational areas vary widely, from less than 10,000 acres for three units to more than 700,000 acres for the Sawtooth NRA.

1. Spruce Knob-Seneca Rocks National Recreation Area (WV)—P.L. 89-207; 2 pages.

2. Whiskeytown-Shasta-Trinity National Recreation Area (CA)—P.L. 89-336; 6+ pages. Jointly managed with National Park Service.

3. Mount Rogers National Recreation Area (VA)—P.L. 89-438; 1½ pages.

4. Flaming Gorge National Recreation Area (UT-WY)—P.L. 90-540; 2½ pages.

5. Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area (OR)—P.L. 92-259; 4½ pages.

6. Sawtooth National Recreation Area (ID)—P.L. 92-400; 5+ pages.

7. Hells Canyon National Recreation Area (ID-OR)—P.L. 94-199; 6+ pages.

8. Arapaho National Recreation Area (CO)—P.L. 95-450, Indian Peaks Wilderness Area, the Arapaho National Recreation Area and the Oregon Islands Wilderness Area Act; 2½ pages.

9. Rattlesnake National Recreation Area (MT)—P.L. 96-476, Rattlesnake National Recreation Area and Wilderness Act of 1980; 2½ pages.

10. Robert T. Stafford White Rocks National Recreation Area (VT)—P.L. 98-322, Vermont Wilderness Act of 1984, Title II; 2 pages.

11. Oregon Cascades Recreation Area (OR)—P.L. 98-328, Oregon Wilderness Act of 1984, §4; 2+ pages.

12. Mount Baker National Recreation Area (WA)—P.L. 98-339, Washington State Wilderness Act of 1984 §7; ½ page.

13. Allegheny National Recreation Area (PA)—P.L. 98-585, Pennsylvania Wilderness Act of 1984, §6; 1+ pages.

14. Pine Ridge National Recreation Area (NE)—P.L. 99-504, Nebraska Wilderness Act of 1986, Title II; 1½ pages.

15. Winding Stair Mountain National Recreation Area (OK)—P.L. 100-499, Winding Stair Mountain National Recreation Area and Wilderness Act, §8; 1 page

16. Grand Island National Recreation Area (MI)—P.L. 101-292; 6+ pages.

17. Smith River National Recreation Area (CA)—P.L. 101-612, 10 pages (excluding 4+ pages designating wild and scenic rivers).

18. Ed Jenkins National Recreation Area (GA)—P.L. 102-217, Chattahoochee National Forest Protection Act of 1991, §4; 1 page. Originally named Springer Mountain National Recreation Area; name changed in P.L. 102-456.

19. Spring Mountains National Recreation Area (NV)—P.L. 103-63; 4+ pages.

20. Fossil Ridge Recreation Area (CO)—P.L. 103-77, Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993, §5; 1 page.

21. Jemez National Recreational Area (NM)—P.L. 103-104; 4½ pages.

22. Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area (OR)—P.L. 104-208, Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1997; Division B—Oregon Resource Conservation Act of 1996; Title I—Opal Creek Wilderness and Scenic Recreation Area; 6 pages. [Also enacted in P.L. 104-333, Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996, §1023.]

23. Land Between the Lakes National Recreation Area (KY-TN)—P.L. 105-277, Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations, 1999, Div. A, §101(e), Title V; 2 pages (6 columns) in the Congressional Record.

24. Moosalamoo National Recreation Area (VT)—P.L. 109-382, New England Wilderness Act of 2006, Title II—Vermont, Subtitle B; 1 page.

25. Mount Hood National Recreation Area (OR)—P.L. 111-11, Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, Title I, Subtitle C—Mount Hood Wilderness, Oregon, §1204; 2 pages.

26. Bridgeport Winter Recreation Area (CA)—P.L. 111-11, Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, Title I, Subtitle K—Eastern Sierra and Northern San Gabriel Wilderness, California, §1806; 1+page.

Scenic Areas

Congress has designated 11 scenic areas within the National Forest System, each with distinct management direction enacted in the law establishing the area. More than half have been named national scenic areas, but several are unique variations: scenic-research area; scenic highway; national forest scenic area; and national scenic and wildlife area. The rationale for these distinctions is not apparent. No conclusions can be drawn about the general management guidance for these areas, or the differences compared to national monuments and recreation areas. In general, scenic areas are smaller than national monuments and recreation areas; most are less than 10,000 acres, but they range up to 128,303 acres for the Mono Basin National Forest Scenic Area.

1. Cascade Head Scenic-Research Area (OR)—P.L. 93-535; 3½ pages.

2. North Cascades Scenic Highway (WA)—P.L. 98-339, Washington State Wilderness Act of 1984, §8; ½ page.

3. Mono Basin National Forest Scenic Area (CA)—P.L. 98-425, California Wilderness Act of 1984, Title III; 6 pages.

4. Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area (OR-WA)—P.L. 99-663, Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act; 28½ pages.

5. Indian Nations National Scenic and Wildlife Area (OK)—P.L. 100-499, Winding Stair Mountain National Recreation Area and Wilderness Act, §10; ½ page.

6. Beech Creek National Scenic Area (OK)—P.L. 100-499, Winding Stair Mountain National Recreation Area and Wilderness Act, §11; ½ page.

7. Coosa Bald National Scenic Area (GA)—P.L. 102-217, Chattahoochee National Forest Protection Act of 1991, §3; 1 page.

8. Mount Pleasant National Scenic Area (VA)—P.L. 103-314, George Washington National Forest Mount Pleasant National Scenic Area Act; 2+ pages.

9. Saint Helena Island National Scenic Area (MI)—P.L. 106-431, Saint Helena Island National Scenic Area Act; 3 pages.

10 & 11. Seng Mountain National Scenic Area and Bear Creek National Scenic Area (VA)—P.L. 111-11, Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, Title I, Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness, §1104; 2 pages.

Wildlife Preserves

Congress has designated six wildlife preserves within the National Forest System.34 These designations contrast with the other designations. First, they are much older, all having been designated prior to 1934; the oldest of all the other congressionally designated areas is Spruce Knob-Seneca Rocks NRA, designated in 1965. Also, the general management guidance for these areas is much less specific than for other congressionally designated areas, focusing exclusively on wildlife management activities. Finally, the preserves are more difficult to identify on the ground; none have reference maps showing the areas, and none identify the acreage encompassed. According to USFS data, the congressionally designated preserves range from less than 10,000 acres (for several units of the Ouachita and Ozark Preserves) to 612,736 acres for the Grand Canyon Preserve.35

1. Grand Canyon Preserve (AZ)—Act of June 29, 1906, ch. 3593; ½ page in Stats.

2. Norbeck Wildlife Preserve (SD)—Act of June 5, 1920, ch. 247; 1 page in Stats. Originally named Custer State Park Game Sanctuary.

3. Ozark Wildlife Preserve (AR; 5 units)—Act of Feb. 28, 1925, ch. 376; ½ page in Stats.

4. Tahquitz National Game Preserve (CA)—Act of July 3, 1926, ch. 776; 1 page in Stats.

5. Ocala National Game Refuge (FL)—Act of June 28, 1930, ch. 709; ½ page in Stats.

6. Ouachita Wildlife Preserve (AR; 4 units)—Act of June 13, 1933, ch. 63;½ page in Stats.

Protection Areas

Congress has designated 37 areas within the National Forest System for some form of special protection. Each has distinct purposes and management direction enacted in the law designating the area. A few general designations are used—special management area, protection area, etc.—but many are unique and some areas have no title or name in the enabling legislation. Because of the broad array of purposes and guidance, no general conclusions can be drawn about these designations, or their differences compared to national monuments, recreation areas, and/or scenic areas. These designations are generally smaller than the monuments and recreation areas, but have a wide range of acreage, from less than 300 acres to 222,000 acres.

1. Special Management Unit adjacent to Washakie Wilderness (WY)36—P.L. 92-476, §5; ½ page.

2. Bull Run Watershed Management Unit (OR)—P.L. 95-200; 3+ pages.

3. Boundary Waters Canoe Area (BWCA) Mining Protection Zone (MN)—P.L. 95-495, Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act; 2½ pages.

4. Area adjacent to Lee Metcalf Wilderness (MT)—P.L. 96-140, Lee Metcalf Wilderness Act of 1978, §2(c); ½ page.

5. Antone Bench Area (UT)—P.L. 98-428, Utah Wilderness Act of 1984, §306; 1 page.

6. Klamath River Basin Conservation Area (CA)—P.L. 99-552; 6½ pages.

7. Kings River Special Management Area (CA)—P.L. 100-150, §2; 2 pages.

8 & 9. Beech Creek Botanical Area and Robert S. Kerr Arboretum, Natural Center, and Botanical Area (OK)—P.L. 100-499, Winding Stair Mountain National Recreation Area and Wilderness Act, §9; 1 page.

10-21. Tongass National Forest Land Use Designation (LUD) II Management Areas (AK)—P.L. 101-626, Tongass Reform Act, §201; 1 page.

22 & 23. East Fork and Eagle Creek Areas (IL)—P.L. 101-633, Illinois Wilderness Act of 1990, §10; ½ page.

24. Greer Spring Special Management Area (MO)—P.L. 102-220, Greer Spring Acquisition and Protection Act of 1991, §4; 1 page.

25. Bowen Gulch Protection Area (CO)—P.L. 103-77, Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993, §6; ½ page.

26, 27, & 28. Piedra, Roubideau, and Tabeguache Areas (CO)—P.L. 103-77, Colorado Wilderness Act of 1993, §9; 1 page.

29. Kelly Butte Special Management Area (WA)—P.L. 105-277, Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appropriations, 1999, Div. A, §101(e), Title VI, §611; ½ page.

30. Granite Watershed Area (CA)—P.L. 105-281, Granite Watershed Enhancement and Protection Act of 1998; 2 pages.

31. James Peak Protection Area (CO)—P.L. 107-216, James Peak Wilderness and Protection Area Act, §3; 3 pages

32. T'uf Shur Bien Preservation Trust Area (NM)—P.L. 108-7, Consolidated Appropriations Resolution, 2003, Division F, Title IV—T'uf Shur Bien Preservation Trust Area Act; 15 pages.

33. Crystal Springs Watershed Special Resources Management Unit (OR)—P.L. 111-11, Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, Title I, Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon, §1205(a); 2½ pages.

34 & 35. Upper Big Bottom and Cultus Creek Areas (OR)—P.L. 111-11, Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, Title I, Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon, §1205(b); 1 page.

36. Ancient Bristlecone Pine Forest (CA)—P.L. 111-11, Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, Title I, Subtitle K—Eastern Sierra and Northern San Gabriel Wilderness, California, §1808; 1 page.

37. Wyoming Range Withdrawal Area (WY)—P.L. 111-11, Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, Title III, Subtitle C—Wyoming Range; 2 pages.

Other Designations

Congress has enacted 11 other designations that do not have common purposes or management schemes as described in the previous sections of this appendix. Two are historic sites—the Cradle of Forestry, which is largely the Biltmore Estate, where Gifford Pinchot (the first USFS chief) first practiced forestry; and Grey Towers, the Pinchot family estate. Another one is a special site for astronomical research. Four provide management direction that seems to differ little from the general management direction for National Forest System lands and units. One provides special mining access at the edge of a designated wilderness; another provides special allocation of timber revenues. The last two are unique—a tallgrass prairie and a working ranch/forest intended to be managed on a self-sustaining basis. These areas range in size from less than 5,000 acres to nearly 550,000 acres.

1. Cradle of Forestry in America (NC)—P.L. 90-398; 1 page.

2. Alpine Lakes Area Management Unit (WA)—P.L. 94-357; 4½ pages.

3 & 4. Gospel-Hump Management Areas and Development Areas (ID)—P.L. 95-237, Endangered American Wilderness Act of 1978, §4; 2½ pages.

5. Special Mining Management Zone—Clear Creek (ID)—P.L. 96-312, Central Idaho Wilderness Act of 1980, §5(d); 1 page.

6. Langmuir Research Site (NM)—P.L. 96-550, New Mexico Wilderness Act of 1980, Title II; 1 page.

7. Quinault Special Management Area (WA)—P.L. 100-638; 3+ pages.

8. Midewin National Tallgrass Prairie (IL)—P.L. 104-106, National Defense Authorization Act for FY1996, Title XXIX—Illinois Land Conservation Act of 1995, Subtitle A; 10½ pages.

9. Valles Caldera National Preserve (NM)—P.L. 106-248, Valles Caldera Preservation Act; 15+ pages.

10. Grey Towers National Historic Site (PA)—P.L. 108-447, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, Division E, §348; 3 pages.

11. Pickerel Hill Management Area (CA)—P.L. 111-11, Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009, Title I, Subtitle K—Eastern Sierra and Northern San Gabriel Wilderness, California, §1807; ¼ page.

Footnotes

1.

The act also designated areas on lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service, in the Department of the Interior, including 33 new wilderness areas, 7 additions to existing wilderness areas, at least 25 wild and scenic rivers, and 3 new conservation areas.

2.

For information on pending wilderness legislation (which also commonly includes other congressional land area designations), see CRS Report R40237, Federal Lands Managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Forest Service (FS): Issues for the 111th Congress, coordinated by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed].

3.

Act of March 3, 1891, ch. 561; 16 U.S.C. §471. The forest reserves were renamed national forests in the Act of March 4, 1907. The authority for the President to proclaim forest reserves was repealed in 1976; now only Congress can create new national forests or modify the existing boundaries.

4.

Seventh unnumbered paragraph under "Surveying the Public Lands" in § 1 of the Sundry Civil Appropriations Act for FY1898, Act of June 4, 1897, ch. 2; 16 U.S.C. §475.

5.

Act of March 4, 1907, ch. 2907.

6.

Act of February 1, 1905, ch. 288; 16 U.S.C. §472.

7.

P.L. 86-517; 16 U.S.C. §§ 528-531.

8.

P.L. 94-588; 16 U.S.C. §§ 1600-1614. NFMA was largely an amendment to the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 (RPA; P.L. 93-378). RPA requires a periodic national assessment of resource conditions, a program for all USFS activities to address needs identified in the assessment, a presidential statement of policy, and an annual report, as well as requiring management plans for NFS units. Despite this unit planning requirement in RPA, such planning is commonly referred to as NFMA planning (or forest planning) because NFMA added many details on considerations and requirements in the planning process.

9.

The USFS is allowed to combine national forests administratively for planning purposes. Thus, while there are 155 proclaimed national forests, there are only 105 national forest units for planning and administration.

10.

P.L. 91-190; 42 U.S.C. §4321-4347.

11.

P.L. 93-205; 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1540.

12.

Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 481 F.Supp. 2d 1059 (N.D. Cal. 2007).

13.

Citizens for Better Forestry v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 632 F.Supp. 2d 968 (N.D. Cal. 2009).

14.

For more information, and the current status of planning regulations and litigation, see CRS Report R40237, Federal Lands Managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Forest Service (FS): Issues for the 111th Congress, coordinated by [author name scrubbed] and [author name scrubbed].

15.

Congress also created a National Park System and a National Wildlife Refuge System, both administered within the Department of the Interior, for special management emphasis on the federal lands included in those systems. While there are hearings and committee reports on most statutes designating special management areas, there has been very little discussion of why Congress has chosen to designate some areas for special management emphasis by the USFS and other areas for relatively similar management emphasis by a different federal agency.

16.

A third "system" with a specific purpose, the National Trails System, also contains NFS lands. However, the National Trails System Act (P.L. 90-543; 16 U.S.C. §§1241-1249) includes no direction for managing corridors along the designated routes, and thus creates no special management areas.

17.

For background, see CRS Report RL31447, Wilderness: Overview and Statistics, by [author name scrubbed].

18.

P.L. 88-577; 16 U.S.C. §§ 1130-1136.

19.

Although protection of the forest reserves was an original purpose of the NFS, some early USFS employees (notably Aldo Leopold and Bob Marshall) recognized the need to protect some areas in their natural state. Acting at its own discretion, the USFS created the first wilderness area in the Gila National Forest (NM) in 1924. In the succeeding decades, the agency's system of wilderness, wild, and primitive areas (most of which have been subsequently designated as wilderness by Congress) grew to 14.6 million acres.

20.

For more detailed information on management directions and exceptions, see CRS Report RL33827, Wilderness Laws: Permitted and Prohibited Uses, by [author name scrubbed].

21.

The language only directly applied to the areas designated in the 1964 act, but it has generally been applied to other designated areas by reference to the 1964 act in the subsequent laws designating wilderness areas.

22.

Many bills also contain provisions withdrawing the lands from entry appropriation, and disposal under the public land, mining, and mineral and geothermal leasing laws, effectively reinforcing Wilderness Act provisions. "No buffer zone" language is also often included to prevent the wilderness designation from affecting management of adjoining lands, even though the Wilderness Act contains no authority to regulate activities outside the designated areas.

23.

See CRS Report RL30755, Forest Fire/Wildfire Protection, by [author name scrubbed].

24.

P.L. 90-542; 16 U.S.C. §§ 1271-1287.

25.

The congressionally designated game refuges and wildlife preserves within the NFS remain part of the NFS, and have not been transferred to and are not part of the National Wildlife Refuge System administered by the Fish and Wildlife Service in the Department of the Interior.

26.

P.L. 98-579; 43 U.S.C. §§ 1701 et seq. The repeal of most of the public land laws was done in several sections in Title VII of FLPMA, and generally allowed their continued application in Alaska for an additional 10 years (i.e., through 1986).

27.

Uneven-aged timber management is a silvicultural approach where a relatively few trees are harvested at relatively frequent intervals to yield timber stands with a variety of sizes (and of species, where that is natural and feasible). This contrasts with even-aged timber management, where all or the majority of trees on a site are harvested at the same time (e.g., by clearcutting) and the regenerated stand is generally trees of the same size and species.

28.

The length is provided for the statute, and sometimes for relatively long provisions in the statute, as an indication of the level of detail enacted by Congress.

29.

The Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument is jointly managed with the BLM; more than 2 million acres of the 2.7 million acre monument are BLM land.

30.

Misty Fjords and Admiralty Island National Monuments were initially created by presidential proclamation, but the designations were subsequently enacted by Congress.

31.

The Transferal Area, Corridor, and Area Adjacent are unique designations on the referenced map that are to become part of the Monument upon the termination, cancellation, or relinquishment of the three specified geothermal leases.

32.

Now the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).

33.

Uneven-aged timber management is one of the standard silvicultural approaches to timber management (the other being even-aged timber management). See David M Smith et al., The Practice of Silviculture: Applied Forest Ecology, 9th ed. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1997).

34.

This excludes six comparable areas established by presidential proclamation under the authority of the Act of August 11, 1916 (16 U.S.C. §683 et seq.): Pisgah National Game Refuge (10/17/1916); Cherokee Game Refuge (8/5/1924); Big Levels Game Refuge (7/6/0935); Noontootly National Game Refuge (7/6/1938), National Catahoula Wildlife Management Preserve (9/27/1941), and National Red Dirt Wildlife Management Preserve (9/27/1941).

35.

USDA Forest Service, Land Areas Report (LAR)—as of Sept 30, 2009, Washington, Table 17, http://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar/2009/LAR_Table_17.html.

36.

Identified as DuNoir Basin Special Management Area in legislation subsequently introduced (but not enacted) to modify the designation.

37.

This is essentially the same provision as in §13 of NFMA (16 U.S.C. §1611).