Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S.
Interests

Jim Nichol
Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs
September 10, 2009
Congressional Research Service
7-5700
www.crs.gov
97-1055
CRS Report for Congress
P
repared for Members and Committees of Congress

Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

Summary
This report examines the political, economic, and foreign policies undertaken by Turkmenistan’s
President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow, who came to power in late 2006. The report discusses
U.S. policy and assistance and provides basic facts and biographical information. It may be
updated. Related products include CRS Report RL33458, Central Asia: Regional Developments
and Implications for U.S. Interests
.


Congressional Research Service

Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

Contents
U.S. Policy.................................................................................................................................. 1
Contributions to Counter-Terrorism............................................................................................. 3
Foreign Policy and Defense......................................................................................................... 3
Political and Economic Developments ........................................................................................ 4

Figures
Figure 1. Map of Turkmenistan ................................................................................................... 1

Contacts
Author Contact Information ........................................................................................................ 9

Congressional Research Service


Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

U.S. Policy
According to the Obama Administration, Turkmenistan’s new government “has demonstrated its
commitment to an overall positive trajectory of reform” in internal security, education, foreign
policy, and economic policy. U.S. assistance aims to help Turkmenistan navigate such challenges
as “a surging illegal drug trade, a potential rise of radical violent Islam, monetary instability, and
a legacy of Soviet repression.”1
Figure 1. Map of Turkmenistan

Source: Map Resources
Cumulative U.S. aid budgeted for Turkmenistan in FY1992-FY2007 was $285.6 million
(FREEDOM Support Act and other agency funding), most involving food aid and training and
exchanges. Turkmenistan’s lack of progress in economic and political reforms under its late
president was cited by successive Administrations as a reason why only limited U.S. aid was
provided (compared with other Central Asian states). Budgeted aid for FY2008 was $7.2 million,
estimated aid for FY2009 was $8.9 million, and the Administration requested $16.65 million for
FY2010 (FREEDOM Support Act and other Function 150 foreign aid, excluding Defense and
Energy Department funds).
The Administration states that “the request for FY2010 is a significant increase over previous
years,” and will focus on supporting stabilization operations and security sector reform, economic
growth, and civil society development. In the area of stabilization operations and security sector
reform, the Administration expects to boost training for Turkmen officers in U.S. military

1 U.S. Department of State. Congressional Budget Justification for Foreign Operations, FY2010, May 12, 2009.
Congressional Research Service
1

Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

institutions and to provide more equipment to enhance border security and counter-narcotics
efforts. In the area of civil society, the Administration plans to “continue to test the waters” by
providing support for “culturally-accepted” NGO activities, such as HIV awareness and advocacy
for disabled persons and agricultural workers. In the area of economic growth, the Administration
plans to continue and bolster an array of programs now permitted by the new government,
including advice to the government on financial sector reform, trade policy, and business
development; support for establishing a transparent export market for excess electricity that can
be sold to Afghanistan and other countries; and training in new agricultural techniques,
marketing, and water usage. 2
During his July 2009 visit to Turkmenistan, Undersecretary of State William Burns stated that his
meetings with President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow and other officials and civil society
representatives were “a reflection of the high priority that President Obama attaches to our
relationship.” He announced that a bilateral commission would be formed to “make progress in
economic cooperation, in energy cooperation, and working together against the spread of
narcotics and terrorism, in contribut[ing] to stability in Afghanistan and across the region, and
also in [discussing] issues related to civil society, education, cultural exchanges and human
rights.”3

2 Congressional Budget Justification for Foreign Operations, FY2010.
3 U.S. Embassy, Ashgabat, Turkmenistan. Remarks to the Press by Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs
William J. Burns
, July 11, 2009.
Congressional Research Service
2

Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

Contributions to Counter-Terrorism
Immediately after the terrorist attacks on the
Basic Facts
United States on September 11, 2001, the
Area and Population: Land area is 188,457 sq. mi.;
Turkmen foreign ministry stated that
slightly larger than California. The Kara Kum desert
Turkmenistan’s policy of neutrality and its
covers about 80% of land area. Population is 4.88 million
friendship with the Taliban precluded
(The World Factbook, mid-2009 est.).
cooperation in a U.S.-led military campaign.
Ethnicity: 85% are Turkmen, 5% are Uzbek, 4% are
After Russia’s then-President Vladimir Putin
Russian, and others (The World Factbook, 2003 est.).
acceded to an expanded U.S. military
Turkmen clans include the Tekke, Ersary, and Yomud.
presence in Central Asia, however, former
About 150,000 ethnic Turkmen reside elsewhere in the
former Soviet Union, over 2 million in Iran, and over
Turkmen President Saparamurad Niyazov on
900,000 in Afghanistan.
September 24, 2001, gave his consent for
Gross Domestic Product: $29.8 billion; per capita
ground transport and overflights to deliver
GDP is about $6,200 (The World Factbook, 2008 est.,
humanitarian aid to support U.S.-led anti-
purchasing power parity).
terrorism efforts in Afghanistan because “evil
Political Leaders: President and Prime Minister:
must be punished.” Turkmenistan also
Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow (also spelled
permitted refueling privileges for
Berdymukhammedov); Chairman of the Mejlis (legislature):
humanitarian flights and reportedly sold and
Akja Nurberdiyewa; Foreign Minister (and deputy prime
transported jet fuel by rail to Afghanistan.
minister): Rashid Meredow; Minister of Defense: Yaylym
Land transport reportedly was ramped down
Berdiyew.
or ended in recent years.4 In February 2009,
Biography: Berdimuhamedow was born in 1957 in the
President Berdimuhamedow agreed in
Ashkhabad Region. He graduated from the Turkmen
Medical Institute in 1979 and undertook graduate work in
principle that the country would again
Moscow. Until 1995, he was a junior member of the
facilitate the land transit of humanitarian
dentistry department, an associate professor, and the
cargoes to Afghanistan. There have been
dean of the dentistry faculty of the Turkmen Medical
reports that authorities have blocked or
Institute. In 1995-1997, he was an official in the Turkmen
hampered some NATO overflights to
Ministry of Health and was minister 1997-2006. In 2001-
2006, he also was a deputy prime minister. He was named
Afghanistan. In late August 2009,
acting president on December 21, 2006, and was elected
Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan reportedly
president on February 11, 2007.
refused permission for German Airborne
Warning and Control System (AWAC)
aircraft to transit to Afghanistan.
Foreign Policy and Defense
Turkmenistan’s “neutral” foreign policy is enshrined in its constitution and the U.N. General
Assembly in 1995 recognized Turkmenistan’s neutrality. Berdimuhamedow has eschewed joining
political or military alliances and has pursued good relations with both East and West.
Turkmenistan has pursued close ties with both Iran and Turkey. In addition to trade ties with Iran,
Turkmenistan is also interested in cultural ties with the approximately one million Turkmen
residing in Iran. Turkmenistan has cooperated with Russia in some areas while seemingly
resisting other Russian influence. In 1992, the two states signed a Friendship and Cooperation
Treaty containing security provisions. Although Turkmenistan joined the post-Soviet

4 Deirdre Tynan, “Turkmenistan: Ashgabat Hosts US Military Refueling, Resupply Operations,” Eurasia Insight, July
8, 2009.
Congressional Research Service
3

Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), it did not sign the Collective Security Treaty and
refused to sign other CIS agreements viewed as violating its sovereignty and neutrality. Relations
with Uzbekistan and Azerbaijan have been tense but have improved somewhat during
Berdimuhamedow’s leadership. Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan have vied for regional influence
and argued over water sharing. Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan have rival claims to some Caspian
Sea oil and gas fields.
Turkmenistan’s armed forces number about 22,000, including 18,500 ground, 3,000 air, and about
500 naval/coast guard forces.5 Other forces include police and security troops, a presidential
guard, and border troops. In late 1999, Russia’s 1,000 border troops in Turkmenistan pulled out at
Turkmenistan’s request (some “special border troops” reportedly remain), and by 2002,
Turkmenistan had replaced its officer corps with ethnic Turkmen. In 1994, Turkmenistan became
the first Central Asian state to join NATO’s Partnership for Peace (PFP). Turkmen officers have
participated in or observed several PFP exercises. In January 2009, a new defense doctrine was
released that calls for Turkmenistan to be able to provide for its own national security.
Turkmenistan reportedly is actively purchasing military equipment in accordance with the new
doctrine. In August 2009, President Berdimuhamedow decreed that the navy/coast guard base of
Turkmenbasy would be upgraded and coastal radars and ships would be purchased “to fight
effectively against smugglers, terrorists and any other forces who try to illegally use our state sea
border or create an unstable situation.”6
Political and Economic Developments
During Berdimuhamedow’s rule, Turkmenistan has continued to be the most authoritarian of the
Central Asian states, according to the State Department. Turkmenistan’s May 1992 constitution
set up a “secular democracy” granted the president overwhelming powers to rule by decree. The
constitution includes an impressive list of individual rights, but emphasizes that the exercise of
rights must not violate public order or damage national security. It created a 2,500-member
People’s Council (Halk Maslahaty or HM) with mixed executive and legislative powers,
consisting of the president, ministers, the fifty legislators of the Supreme Council (Mejlis),
“people’s representatives,” and others. The HM has served as an occasional forum and rubber
stamp for the president’s policy initiatives. The Mejlis routinely has supported presidential
decrees and has little legislative initiative. All judges are appointed by the president without
legislative review. In December 1999, members of the HM and Niyazov’s National Revival
Movement (a civic group) met in a joint session to approve changes to the Constitution, including
naming Niyazov president for life. In August 2003, the HM approved constitutional changes
making it the supreme legislative and executive body and greatly expanding its size. Niyazov
explained that it would be harder for coup plotters to take over such a large body.

Exile groups opposed to the regime have included those formed by former officials who have fled
the country. Such groups include the United Democratic Opposition, headed by former foreign
minister Awdy Kulyyew (Kuliyev); the Watan Social-Political Movement, headed by former
deputy chairman of the Central Bank Annadurdy Hajyyew (Khadzhiyev); the Republican Party,

5 International Institute of Strategic Studies. The Military Balance, February 1, 2009.
6 Open Source Center. Central Eurasia: Daily Report (hereafter CEDR), August 31, 2009, Doc. No. CEP-950194.
Congressional Research Service
4

Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

headed by former ambassador to Turkey Nurmuhammet Hanamow (Khanamov); and the
Fatherland movement, founded by former prime minister Hudayberdi Orazow (Orazov). The
latter three leaders received life sentences in absentia on charges of instigating the 2002 coup
attempt. Another alleged coup plotter, former foreign minister Boris Orazowic Syhmyradow
(Shikhmuradov), supposedly remains imprisoned.
President Niyazov died on December 21, 2006, at age 66, ostensibly from a heart attack. The
morning of his death, the government announced that Berdimuhamedow, then the deputy prime
minister and health minister, would serve as acting president. The HM convened on December 26
and changed the constitution to make legitimate Berdimuhamedow’s position as acting president.
It quickly approved an electoral law and announced that the next presidential election would be
held on February 11, 2007. The HM designated six candidates for the presidential election, one
from each region, all of whom were government officials. Exiled politicians were banned from
participation. Reportedly, nearly 99% of 2.6 million voters turned out, and 89.23% endorsed
acting president Berdimuhamedow.
An OSCE needs assessment mission visited during the campaign. It praised some provisions of a
new presidential election law, such as those permitting multiple candidacies and access by
electoral observers, but criticized others, including those permitting only citizens approved by the
legislature and who had served as state officials to run. A small OSCE delegation on election day
reportedly was not allowed to view vote-counting. According to the U.S. State Department, the
election “represent[ed] a modest step toward political electoral change that could help create the
conditions in the future for a free, fair, open and truly competitive elections.”7
In his inaugural address on February 14, 2007, Berdimuhamedow pledged to continue to provide
free natural gas, salt, water, and electricity and subsidized bread, gasoline, and housing to the
populace, and to uphold the foreign policy of the previous government. Berdimuhamedow was
acclaimed head of the HM in late March 2007, thus assuming all the top posts held by the late
Niyazov. Berdimuhamedow has removed some of Niyazov’s statues from Ashkhabad and other
symbols of Niyazov’s cult of personality, but Niyazov’s spiritual guide, the Ruhnama, remains
required reading in the schools. Berdimuhamedow appears to be the subject of an emerging cult
of personality, which includes a monument being built in part to glorify his proclamation of a
“new revival era” for Turkmenistan.
A constitutional commission unveiled a draft constitution in July 2008 that after public debate
was approved by the HM on September 26, 2008. The new constitution abolished the HM and
divided its powers between the Mejlis and the president. It enlarged the Mejlis from 65 to 125
members. An early legislative election was held on December 14, 2008. An OSCE pre-election
needs assessment mission stated that “a lack of distinction between civil society organizations,
the party, and the State,” had resulted in only government-approved candidates running for seats,
so that a democratic election was not possible.8 At least two approved candidates ran in each
district, but campaigning was muted and noncontroversial. The Turkmen Central Electoral
Commission reported that almost 94% of the electorate voted on December 14, but some

7 Open Source Center. Central Eurasia: Daily Report (hereafter CEDR), February 12, 2007, Doc. No. CEP-950160.
U.S. Department of State. Daily Press Briefing, February 15, 2007.
8 OSCE. ODIHR. Turkmenistan, Early Parliamentary Elections: OSCE/ODIHR Needs Assessment Mission Report,
October 20, 2008.
Congressional Research Service
5

Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

observers reported a light turnout. President Berdimuhamedow hailed the election as advancing
Turkmen democracy.9
According to the State Department’s Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2008, the
Turkmen government continued to commit serious abuses, and its human rights record remained
poor. Some modest improvements in human rights during the year included the reinstatement of
graduate and postgraduate education for 80 students, the de-emphasis of former President
Niyazov’s Ruhnama (Book of the Soul, a quasi-spiritual guide) and the registration of one
independent non-governmental organization (NGO), the Ak Bugday Gardener’s Association.10
The security services continued to carry out arbitrary arrests and detentions, including
incarceration in psychiatric hospitals. They tortured, routinely beat, and used excessive force
against criminal suspects, prisoners, and individuals critical of the government in order to obtain
confessions. Hundreds of political prisoners allegedly remained imprisoned. The judiciary was
widely reputed to be corrupt and inefficient. Some politically sensitive trials were closed to the
public. There were few defense lawyers and no trial by jury. The courts at times did not allow
defendants to question witnesses against them and in most cases ignored allegations by
defendants that they were tortured. Security personnel were unchecked in tapping telephones,
opening mail, and using other means to monitor citizens and foreigners. Some journalists and
their families reportedly were detained, harassed, and intimidated. The government controlled
radio and television, but many citizens used satellite dishes to gain access to foreign
programming. The government owned all publishing companies and prohibited citizens from
subscribing to foreign print media. There was some progress in extending dial-up Internet service
to the population, although police permission was necessary for hookup and surfing was
monitored by the government. A Russian cellular telephone company provided mobile Internet
service that was available to many citizens.11
The government closely controlled and monitored all religious activities. The government-
appointed Council on Religious Affairs (CRA) exercised direct control over the hiring and firing
of Islamic and Russian Orthodox clergy and the publication of religious materials. Some minority
religious groups reportedly experienced police harassment, disruption of meetings, surveillance,
detentions, and administrative fines.12 The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom
(USCIRF) recommended in its 2009 annual report—as it had since 2000—that the Secretary of
State designate Turkmenistan a “country of particular concern” (CPC), where severe human
rights violations could lead to U.S. sanctions.13
In the summer of 2009, the Turkmen government announced restrictions on permission for
citizens to attend foreign institutions of higher education, affecting thousands of students.
Although most restrictions later were eased, the government allegedly still barred more than 60
students from returning to the American University of Central Asia in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan (a
school supported by U.S. and other international donors). Authorities reportedly had deemed the

9 Annette Bohr, “Turkmenistan,” Nations in Transit 2009, Freedom House, June 30, 2009; CEDR, December 19, 2008,
Doc. No. CEP-950107.
10 U.S. Department of State. Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2008, February 25, 2009.
11 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2008.
12 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2008.
13 USCIRF. Annual Report 2009, May 1, 2009.
Congressional Research Service
6

Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

school illegitimate and allegedly had stated that Turkmenistan did not need citizens trained in
entrepreneurship or liberal arts.14
Turkmenistan’s GDP growth was 10.5% in 2008, and consumer price inflation was 13% (The
World Factbook
; according to the Factbook, official Turkmen economic data are problematic).
Rising food prices during 2008 boosted inflation. Turkmenistan was among the world’s top cotton
producers, but in recent years poor harvests have greatly reduced export earnings. About one-half
of the employed population works in agriculture. State ownership continues in the oil and gas
industry, electrical power generation, and the textile, construction, transport, and communications
sectors. These sectors account for about 75% of GDP. According to the World Bank,
Turkmenistan’s underlying fiscal position has weakened over the years as public sector deficits
have ballooned (including subsidies for consumer goods and industry and agriculture). About
one-third of the population lives in poverty, and about 60% are unemployed (leaving an employed
labor force of less than 1.3 million), although a few necessities of life are provided free or at low
cost. Some observers allege that government corruption is exacerbated by official involvement in
drug trafficking.
In the face of the global economic downturn, in October 2008 President Berdimuhamedow
decreed the establishment of a stabilization fund. Turkmenistan introduced a re-denominated
currency, the new manat, in January 2009. In August 2009, Berdimuhamedow asserted that high
gas prices and stable policies had enabled Turkmenistan to weather the global downturn without
using the stabilization fund. The Economist Intelligence Unit has raised concerns that the fall-off
in gas revenues from Russia since April 2009 will contribute to a 5% decline in Turkmenistan’s
GDP in 2009. However, the expected renewal of gas exports to Russia, along with the beginning
of gas exports to China, are expected to contribute to GDP growth of 8% in 2010.15
The U.S. Department of Energy in early 2008 reported estimates of 600 million barrels of proven
oil reserves and 100 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of proven natural gas reserves in Turkmenistan (which
is less than 1% of the proven world oil reserves and less than 4% of the proven gas reserves in the
Persian Gulf). In the late 1980s, Turkmenistan was the world’s fourth largest natural gas producer.
It is now largely dependent on Russian export routes, and gas and oil production have been held
back by aging infrastructure, inadequate investment, and poor management. In 1993, Russia
halted Turkmen gas exports to Western markets through its pipelines, diverting Turkmen gas to
other Eurasian states that had trouble paying for the gas. In 1997, Russia cut off these shipments
because of transit fee arrears and as leverage to obtain Turkmenistan’s agreement to terms offered
by Russia’s state-owned gas firm Gazprom.
The late Niyazov signed a 25-year accord with Putin in 2003 on supplying Russia up to 211.9
billion cubic feet (bcf) of gas in 2004 (about 12% of production), rising to 2.83 trillion cubic feet
(tcf) in 2009-2028, perhaps then tying up most if not all of Turkmenistan’s future production.
After signing the accord, Turkmenistan has requested several price hikes for its exported gas. In
late 2007, Turkmenistan and Russia agreed on a price of $3.68 per million cubic feet for the first
half of 2008 and $4.25 starting in July 2008, and a price thereafter based on “market principles.”

14 “Turkmenistan Says It Won't Recognize AUCA,” RFE/RL, September 05, 2009; “Turkmenistan: Rules Switch
Hampering Young Scholars from Studying Abroad,” Eurasia Insight, July 28, 2009; “Turkmenistan: Hundreds of
Students Caught in Educational Limbo,” Eurasia Insight, August 7, 2009; “Turkmenistan Eases Restrictions For
Studying Abroad,” RFE/RL, August 20, 2009; Open Source Center. Europe: Daily Report, August 26, 2009, Doc. No.
EUP-950021.
15 Economist Intelligence Unit. Turkmenistan: Country Report, July 2009.
Congressional Research Service
7

Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

President Berdimuhamedow has declared that “adherence to diverse fuel export schemes will
remain as a basic principle of [Turkmenistan’s] economic development strategy.”16 In 2007,
Berdimuhamedow signaled Turkmen interest in building a trans-Caspian gas pipeline. The United
States has advocated building trans-Caspian oil and gas pipelines, because Central Asia could
transport some of its energy through routes not controlled by Russia and Iran. The United States
also has endorsed his proposal to build a gas pipeline through Afghanistan to Pakistan and India,
but investment remains elusive. Some observers warn that Turkmenistan has pledged large
amounts of gas to Russia, China, and other customers in coming years, although it is unclear
whether production can be ramped up in a timely fashion to meet these pledges.
In December 1997, Turkmenistan opened the first pipeline from Central Asia to the outside world
beyond Russia, a 125-mile gas pipeline linkage to Iran. Turkmenistan provided 282.5 bcf of gas
to Iran in 2006 and reportedly a larger amount in 2007. At the end of 2007, however,
Turkmenistan suddenly suspended gas shipments, causing hardship in northern Iran. Turkmen
demands for higher payments were the main reason for the cut-off. Gas shipments resumed in late
April 2008 after Iran agreed to a price boost (see also below).17
As another alternative to pipelines through Russia, in early April 2006, Turkmenistan and China
signed a framework agreement calling for Chinese investment in developing gas fields in
Turkmenistan and in building a gas pipeline with a capacity of about 1.0 tcf per year through
Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan to China. All three Central Asian states will send gas through this
pipeline to China. Construction of the Turkmen section of the gas pipeline reportedly began in
August 2007. Construction of Uzbek section started in June 2008, and construction of the Kazakh
section began in July 2008. This pipeline is planned to be completed by the end of 2009.
Perhaps a further effort to diversify export routes, Turkmenistan signed a memorandum of
understanding in April 2008 with the European Union to supply 353 bcf of gas per year starting in
2009, presumably through a trans-Caspian pipeline.
On the night of April 8-9, 2009, a section of a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to Russia
exploded, halting Turkmen gas shipments. Each side blamed the other for the explosion.18 About
two weeks previously, visiting Turkmenistani President Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow had failed
to reach agreement with Russian President Dmitriy Medvedev on Moscow’s financing for an
east-west gas pipeline across Turkmenistan, to be linked to a proposed pipeline to Russia.
Turkmenistan had then announced an international tender for the east-west pipeline to ensure
“reliable and safe supplies of energy resources to world markets,” and hinted that the pipeline
could link to a possible trans-Caspian pipeline to Azerbaijan and European markets (rather than to
Russia). In July 2009, Turkmenistan announced that a new gas pipeline—from a field that until
April had supplied gas to Russia—would be completed by the end of 2009 to more than double
Turkmenistan’s export capacity to Iran. President Medvedev will visit Turkmenistan in mid-
September 2009, and reportedly he and Berdimuhamedow may agree to renew Turkmen gas
supplies and to build new pipeline links to Russia.

16 CEDR, February 9, 2008, Doc. No. CEP-950154.
17 Iran: Daily Report, January 21, 2008, Doc. No. IAP-11017; January 24, 2008, Doc. No. IAP-950014; April 26, 2008,
Doc. No. IAP-950049; and May 6, 2008, Doc. No. IAP-950052.
18 Open Source Center. OSC Feature, April 14, 2009, Doc. No. FEA-844966; CEDR, April 14, 2009, Doc. No. CEP-
950339; ITAR-TASS, April 3, 2009; Sergey Blagov, “Turkmenistan: Ashgabat Wonders Whether Russia Still Has Deep
Pockets,” Eurasia Insight, March 26, 2009.
Congressional Research Service
8

Turkmenistan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests

At a late April 2009 Turkmen energy conference, U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George
Krol reportedly stressed that Turkmenistan and other states should diversify their energy export
routes.19 President Berdimuhamedow also called for such diversification and for closer European-
Turkmen ties. At an EU energy summit in Prague in early May 2009, U.S. Special Envoy for
Eurasian Energy Richard Morningstar endorsed further development of the “southern corridor”
for the shipment of gas and oil to Western markets. However, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and
Uzbekistan balked at signing a communique pledging the states to back the Nabucco pipeline.
Despite this move, Berdimuhamedow asserted on July 10, 2009, that there are “immense volumes
of natural gas in Turkmenistan [that] make it possible for us to carry out certain work related to
the implementation of various [gas export] projects, including the Nabucco project.”20


Author Contact Information

Jim Nichol

Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs
jnichol@crs.loc.gov, 7-2289





19 Alexander Vershinin, “U.S. Urges Central Asia to Boost Gas Export Routes,” Associated Press, April 24, 2009.
20 CEDR, July 11, 2009, Doc. No. CEP-950124.
Congressional Research Service
9