On February 13, 2009, both the House and Senate passed the conference version of H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA). The primary purposes of the ARRA focus on promoting economic recovery, assisting those most affected by the recession, improving economic efficiency by "spurring technological advances in science and health," investing in infrastructure, and stabilizing state and local government budgets. The House had previously passed its version of H.R. 1 (House-passed bill) on January 28, 2009, while the Senate passed S.Amdt. 570, an amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 1 (Senate-passed bill), on February 10, 2009.
The ARRA provides funds to several existing workforce development programs administered by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), including programs authorized by the Workforce Investment Act (WIA).
This report provides a brief overview of the key provisions related to workforce development programs administered by DOL that were included in the ARRA under Division A, Title VIII, Department of Labor, and provides estimates of state grants for programs for which these estimates are relevant and for which data needed to produce the estimates are available. It also includes a discussion of relevant provisions that were included in the House- and Senate-passed versions of H.R. 1.
The report will not be updated.
O n On February 13, 2009, both the House and the Senate passed the conference version of H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA, hereafter referred to as the "conference version"). The primary purposes of the ARRA focus on promoting economic recovery, assisting those most affected by the recession, improving economic efficiency by "spurring technological advances in science and health," investing in infrastructure, and stabilizing state and local government budgets. The House had previously passed its version of H.R. 1 (hereafter referred to as the "House bill") on January 28, 2009, while the Senate passed S.Amdt. 570, an amendment in the nature of a substitute to H.R. 1 (hereafter referred to as the Senate bill), on February 10, 2009.
Under the House bill and the Senate bill, funds would have been provided to several existing workforce development programs administered by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), including programs authorized by the Workforce Investment Act (WIA). The conference version provides $4.81 billion in funding for these workforce development programs.1
This report provides a brief overview of the key provisions related to workforce development programs administered by DOL that were included in the conference version under Division A, Title VIII, Department of Labor. It also provides estimates of state grants for programs for which these estimates are relevant and for which data needed to produce the estimates are available. The estimates are shown in appendix tables that present state-by-state allocations for adult, youth, and dislocated worker programs.2 It also includes a discussion of relevant provisions that were included in the House- and Senate-passed versions of H.R. 1.
Under the House bill, an additional $5.0 billion would have been provided for existing workforce development and related programs administered by DOL; the Senate bill would have provided $3.93 billion for these same programs. The conference version provides $4.81 billion for workforce development programs. Table 1 gives an overview of the specific funding provided under the House and Senate bills and the conference version. The remainder of this report provides a more detailed discussion of the specific funding provisions.
Table 1. Summary of Appropriations for Workforce Investment and Related Programs Included in H.R. 1
Program |
Total Appropriation ($) |
Total Appropriation ($) |
Total Appropriation ($) |
|||
Title I-B Grants to States for Adult Employment and Training Activities (WIA) |
|
|
|
|||
Title I-B Grants to States for Youth Activities (WIA) |
|
|
|
|||
Title I-B Grants to States for Dislocated Worker Employment and Training Activities (WIA) |
|
|
|
|||
Title I-D National Reserve Assistance for Dislocated Workers (WIA) |
|
|
|
|||
Title I-D YouthBuild Activities (WIA) |
|
|
|
|||
Title I-D Worker Training and Placement in High Growth and Emerging Industry Sectors (WIA) |
|
|
|
|||
Office of Job Corps |
|
|
|
|||
Community Service Employment for Older Americans |
|
|
|
|||
Employment Service Operations |
|
|
|
|||
Departmental Management |
|
|
|
|||
Total |
|
|
|
Source: Table prepared by CRS, February 13, 2009, based on H.R. 1 as passed by the House of Representatives, January 28, 2009, S.Amdt. 570, released by the Senate Committee on Appropriations, February 9, 2009, and conference report to accompany H.R. 1. See footnote 2 for references to online versions.
The House and Senate bills would have provided, and the Conference version did provide, funding for a number of existing workforce development programs, including the three state formula grant programs that provide funding for youth, adults, and dislocated workers—Title I-B of the WIA. Other programs authorized by the WIA will receive funding from the Conference version (and would have received funding under the House and Senate bills): National Reserve (WIA Title I-D, Section 173), YouthBuild (WIA Title I-D, Section 173A), and Pilot and Demonstration Programs (WIA Title I-D, Section 171). Additional workforce development programs provided for in the ARRA include state unemployment insurance and employment service operations, Title V of the Older Americans Act of 1965, and DOL management. Provisions applicable to each of these programs are discussed below.
The Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-220) provides job training and related services to unemployed and underemployed individuals. WIA programs are administered by the DOL, primarily through its Employment and Training Administration (ETA). State and local WIA training and employment activities are provided through a system of One-Stop Career Centers. Authorization of appropriations under WIA expired in FY2003 but is annually extended through appropriations acts.3
WIA authorizes numerous job training programs, including:
The adult program provides training and related services to individuals ages 18 and older through formula grants allocated to states, which in turn allocate funds to local entities. Any individual may receive "core" services (e.g., job search assistance). To receive "intensive" services (e.g., individual career planning and job training), an individual must have received core services and need intensive services to become employed or to obtain or retain employment that allows for self-sufficiency. To receive training services (e.g., occupational skills training), an individual must have received intensive services and need training services to become employed or to obtain or retain employment that allows for self-sufficiency.
Both the House and Senate bills would have provided an additional $500 million for Title I-B grants to states for adult employment and training activities, which would have been available for obligation on the date of enactment of the ARRA. The Senate bill would have required that priority for use of these funds be given to recipients of public assistance and other low-income individuals for intensive services and training. The House bill, however, did not indicate prioritization for use of funds under this section of the act.
The conference version provides an additional $500 million for Title I-B grants to states for adult employment and training activities. Similar to the Senate bill, the conference version requires that priority for use of these funds be given to recipients of public assistance and other low-income individuals for intensive services and training.
Funds for adult employment and training are allocated through the state grant formulas. Estimated state grants were calculated using these formulas after reserving 0.25% of the total appropriation for the outlying areas (as is done when making regular Title I-B allocations). Appendix Table A-1 details the results of these calculations.
The youth program provides training and related services to low-income youth ages 14-21 through formula grants allocated to states, which, in turn, allocate funds to local entities.
Both the House and Senate bills would have provided a total of $1.2 billion for grants for youth activities, including summer employment, which would be available for obligation on the date of enactment of the ARRA.4 Each measure includes provisions affecting the expenditure of these funds:
The conference version provides $1.2 billion for grants for youth activities and specifies that:
Appendix Table A-2 provides estimated state grants under this program.
A majority of WIA dislocated worker funds are allocated by formula grants to states (which in turn allocate funds to local entities) to provide training and related services to individuals who have lost their jobs and are unlikely to return to those jobs or similar jobs in the same industry. The remainder of the appropriation is reserved by DOL for a National Reserve account, which in part provides for National Emergency Grants to states or local entities (as specified under Section 173).
Both the House and Senate bills would have provided a total of $1.0 billion for formula grants to states for employment and training activities for dislocated workers, which would have been available for obligation on the date of enactment of the ARRA.
The House bill would have provided a total of $500 million for the Dislocated Workers National Reserve for grants to eligible entities serving areas of high unemployment or high poverty and experiencing major economic dislocations. Additionally, the House bill would have directed the Secretary of Labor to ensure that applicants for these funds demonstrate the manner in which supportive services (e.g. income support, child care) necessary for participation in job training would be provided.
The Senate bill would have provided a total of $450 million for the Dislocated Workers National Reserve, $200 million of which would have been for national emergency grants.7 Additionally, the Senate bill would have directed the remaining $250 million for competitive grants to train workers for high growth and emerging industry sectors (see details in section on "Title I-D Grants for High Growth and Emerging Industry Sectors," below).
The conference version provides a total of $1.25 billion for formula grants to states for employment and training for dislocated workers. In addition, the conference version provides $200 million for the Dislocated Workers National Reserve, which is used for technical assistance, projects, and emergency grants.
Appendix Table A-3 provides estimated state grants under this program.
This competitive grant program funds projects that provide education and construction skills training for disadvantaged youth. Since its inception in 1992, the program was administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, but was moved to DOL by the YouthBuild Transfer Act (P.L. 109-281), effective for FY2007. Participating youth work primarily through mentorship and apprenticeship programs to rehabilitate and construct housing for homeless and low-income families.
Both the House and Senate bills would have provided additional funding for YouthBuild, which would be available for obligation on the date of enactment of the ARRA. The House bill would have provided $50 million for YouthBuild activities, but, unlike the Senate bill, did not specify any stipulations on expenditures. The Senate bill would have provided $100 million for YouthBuild grants. However, the Senate bill would have allowed, in program years 2008 and 2009, participation for individuals who have dropped out of high school and re-enrolled in an alternative school.8 In addition, the Senate bill would have allowed a local YouthBuild board to award a training contract to an institution of higher education if such a choice would facilitate the training of multiple individuals in high-demand occupations.
The conference version provides $50 million for YouthBuild and, similar to the Senate bill, allows, in program years 2008 and 2009, participation for individuals who have dropped out of high school and re-enrolled in an alternative school, if that re-enrollment is part of a "sequential service strategy" (see footnote 8).
Funds for this program would be distributed by a competitive grant process to provide worker training and placement in high growth and emerging industry sectors.
The House bill would have provided a total of $750 million for these grants. Of the total proposed allotment in the House bill, $500 million would have been reserved for research, labor exchange, and job training projects that prepare workers for careers in the following energy efficiency and renewable energy industries:9
In the House bill, the remainder of $250 million would have been allocated on the basis of priority for projects preparing workers for careers in the health care industry.
The Senate bill would have required the Secretary of Labor, in awarding the $250 million from the Dislocated Workers National Reserve, to give priority to projects that prepare workers for careers in the energy efficiency and renewable energy industries listed above and for careers in the health care sector.
The conference version provides $750 million for competitive grants for worker training in high-growth and emerging sectors. The conference version specifies that:
Job Corps is a residential job training program first established in 1964 that provides services to low-income individuals ages 16-24 primarily through contracts administered by DOL with corporations and nonprofit organizations. Currently, there are 122 Job Corps centers in 48 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. On February 8, 2007, DOL announced that three new centers will open, including the first centers in each of the remaining two states, New Hampshire and Wyoming.
The House bill would have provided a total of $300 million to the Job Corps program, and the Senate bill would have provided $160 million for the Job Corps program. Both allocations would have been available for obligation on the date of enactment of the ARRA and would have remained available for obligation through June 30, 2010. While both the House and Senate bills would have allowed the Secretary of Labor to transfer up to 15% of the allocated funds for operational needs of Job Corps Centers, the House and Senate bills contained different stipulations:
The conference version provides $250 million for the construction, rehabilitation, and acquisition of Job Corps Centers, with the following provisions:
In addition to adding funds to the job training programs in Title I of WIA, both the House and Senate bills would have provided additional funding for three related programs:
The conference version also provides additional funding for three workforce development-related programs:
Table A-1. Estimated Additional State Grants for Adult Activities (WIA Title I-B) Grants to States at an Appropriation Level of $500 Million
State |
Estimated Additional State Grants |
|||||
FY2009 ($) |
FY2009 ($) |
FY2009 ($) |
||||
Alabama |
|
|
|
|||
Alaska |
|
|
|
|||
Arizona |
|
|
|
|||
Arkansas |
|
|
|
|||
California |
|
|
|
|||
Colorado |
|
|
|
|||
Connecticut |
|
|
|
|||
Delaware |
|
|
|
|||
District of Columbia |
|
|
|
|||
Florida |
|
|
|
|||
Georgia |
|
|
|
|||
Hawaii |
|
|
|
|||
Idaho |
|
|
|
|||
Illinois |
|
|
|
|||
Indiana |
|
|
|
|||
Iowa |
|
|
|
|||
Kansas |
|
|
|
|||
Kentucky |
|
|
|
|||
Louisiana |
|
|
|
|||
Maine |
|
|
|
|||
Maryland |
|
|
|
|||
Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|||
Michigan |
|
|
|
|||
Minnesota |
|
|
|
|||
Mississippi |
|
|
|
|||
Missouri |
|
|
|
|||
Montana |
|
|
|
|||
Nebraska |
|
|
|
|||
Nevada |
|
|
|
|||
New Hampshire |
|
|
|
|||
New Jersey |
|
|
|
|||
New Mexico |
|
|
|
|||
New York |
|
|
|
|||
North Carolina |
|
|
|
|||
North Dakota |
|
|
|
|||
Ohio |
|
|
|
|||
Oklahoma |
|
|
|
|||
Oregon |
|
|
|
|||
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|||
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|||
Rhode Island |
|
|
|
|||
South Carolina |
|
|
|
|||
South Dakota |
|
|
|
|||
Tennessee |
|
|
|
|||
Texas |
|
|
|
|||
Utah |
|
|
|
|||
Vermont |
|
|
|
|||
Virginia |
|
|
|
|||
Washington |
|
|
|
|||
West Virginia |
|
|
|
|||
Wisconsin |
|
|
|
|||
Wyoming |
|
|
|
|||
Subtotal to states, DC, and Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|||
Outlying areas |
|
|
|
|||
Total |
|
|
|
Source: CRS estimates based on analysis of FY2009 DOL data. Table prepared by CRS, February 13, 2009, based on H.R. 1 as passed by the House of Representatives, January 28, 2009, S.Amdt. 570, released by the Senate Committee on Appropriations, February 9, 2009, and conference report to accompany H.R. 1. See footnote 2 for references to online versions.
Notes: Funds were allocated through the WIA Adult Activities Grant formulas. Details may not add to totals due to rounding.
Notice: These are estimated grants only. These estimates are provided solely to assist in comparisons of the relative impact of alternative formulas and funding levels in the legislative process. They are not intended to predict specific amounts states will receive.
Table A-2. Estimated Additional State Grants for Youth Activities (WIA Title I-B) Grants to States at an Appropriation Level of $1.2 Billion
State |
Estimated Additional State Grants |
|||||
FY2009 ($) |
FY2009 ($) |
FY2009 ($) |
||||
Alabama |
|
|
|
|||
Alaska |
|
|
|
|||
Arizona |
|
|
|
|||
Arkansas |
|
|
|
|||
California |
|
|
|
|||
Colorado |
|
|
|
|||
Connecticut |
|
|
|
|||
Delaware |
|
|
|
|||
District of Columbia |
|
|
|
|||
Florida |
|
|
|
|||
Georgia |
|
|
|
|||
Hawaii |
|
|
|
|||
Idaho |
|
|
|
|||
Illinois |
|
|
|
|||
Indiana |
|
|
|
|||
Iowa |
|
|
|
|||
Kansas |
|
|
|
|||
Kentucky |
|
|
|
|||
Louisiana |
|
|
|
|||
Maine |
|
|
|
|||
Maryland |
|
|
|
|||
Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|||
Michigan |
|
|
|
|||
Minnesota |
|
|
|
|||
Mississippi |
|
|
|
|||
Missouri |
|
|
|
|||
Montana |
|
|
|
|||
Nebraska |
|
|
|
|||
Nevada |
|
|
|
|||
New Hampshire |
|
|
|
|||
New Jersey |
|
|
|
|||
New Mexico |
|
|
|
|||
New York |
|
|
|
|||
North Carolina |
|
|
|
|||
North Dakota |
|
|
|
|||
Ohio |
|
|
|
|||
Oklahoma |
|
|
|
|||
Oregon |
|
|
|
|||
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|||
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|||
Rhode Island |
|
|
|
|||
South Carolina |
|
|
|
|||
South Dakota |
|
|
|
|||
Tennessee |
|
|
|
|||
Texas |
|
|
|
|||
Utah |
|
|
|
|||
Vermont |
|
|
|
|||
Virginia |
|
|
|
|||
Washington |
|
|
|
|||
West Virginia |
|
|
|
|||
Wisconsin |
|
|
|
|||
Wyoming |
|
|
|
|||
Subtotal for states, DC, and Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|||
Outlying areas and Native Americans |
|
|
|
|||
Total |
|
|
|
Source: CRS estimates based on analysis of FY2009 DOL data. Table prepared by CRS, February 13, 2009, based on H.R. 1 as passed by the House of Representatives, January 28, 2009, S.Amdt. 570, released by the Senate Committee on Appropriations, February 9, 2009, and conference report to accompany H.R. 1. See footnote 2 for references to online versions.
Notes: Funds were allocated through the WIA Youth Activities Grant formulas. Details may not add to totals due to rounding. As noted in footnote 4, the statutory formulas for state allotments for WIA Youth Activities stipulate that a total allotment in excess of $1 billion normally triggers a change in the allocation formula; however, the ARRA specifies the formula allocation is to remain the same as if the total allocation were less than $1 billion.
Notice: These are estimated grants only. These estimates are provided solely to assist in comparisons of the relative impact of alternative formulas and funding levels in the legislative process. They are not intended to predict specific amounts that states will receive.
Table A-3. Estimated Additional State Grants for Dislocated Worker Activities (WIA Title I-B) Grants to States at an Appropriation Level of $1.25 Billion
State |
Estimated Additional State Grants |
|||||
FY2009 ($) |
FY2009 ($) |
FY2009 ($) |
||||
Alabama |
|
|
|
|||
Alaska |
|
|
|
|||
Arizona |
|
|
|
|||
Arkansas |
|
|
|
|||
California |
|
|
|
|||
Colorado |
|
|
|
|||
Connecticut |
|
|
|
|||
Delaware |
|
|
|
|||
District of Columbia |
|
|
|
|||
Florida |
|
|
|
|||
Georgia |
|
|
|
|||
Hawaii |
|
|
|
|||
Idaho |
|
|
|
|||
Illinois |
|
|
|
|||
Indiana |
|
|
|
|||
Iowa |
|
|
|
|||
Kansas |
|
|
|
|||
Kentucky |
|
|
|
|||
Louisiana |
|
|
|
|||
Maine |
|
|
|
|||
Maryland |
|
|
|
|||
Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|||
Michigan |
|
|
|
|||
Minnesota |
|
|
|
|||
Mississippi |
|
|
|
|||
Missouri |
|
|
|
|||
Montana |
|
|
|
|||
Nebraska |
|
|
|
|||
Nevada |
|
|
|
|||
New Hampshire |
|
|
|
|||
New Jersey |
|
|
|
|||
New Mexico |
|
|
|
|||
New York |
|
|
|
|||
North Carolina |
|
|
|
|||
North Dakota |
|
|
|
|||
Ohio |
|
|
|
|||
Oklahoma |
|
|
|
|||
Oregon |
|
|
|
|||
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|||
Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|||
Rhode Island |
|
|
|
|||
South Carolina |
|
|
|
|||
South Dakota |
|
|
|
|||
Tennessee |
|
|
|
|||
Texas |
|
|
|
|||
Utah |
|
|
|
|||
Vermont |
|
|
|
|||
Virginia |
|
|
|
|||
Washington |
|
|
|
|||
West Virginia |
|
|
|
|||
Wisconsin |
|
|
|
|||
Wyoming |
|
|
|
|||
Subtotal for states, DC, and Puerto Rico |
|
|
|
|||
Outlying areas |
|
|
|
|||
Total |
|
|
|
Source: CRS estimates based on analysis of FY2009 DOL data. Table prepared by CRS, February 13, 2009, based on H.R. 1 as passed by the House of Representatives, January 28, 2009, S.Amdt. 570, released by the Senate Committee on Appropriations, February 9, 2009, and conference report to accompany H.R. 1. See footnote 2 for references to online versions.
Notes: The allocation formula for dislocated worker funding typically includes a set-aside for the National Reserve account. However, the ARRA includes a separate provision for this National Reserve; thus the full $1 billion is allocated for state grants in Table A-3. Details may not add to totals due to rounding. The allocation formula for Dislocated Worker grants uses a three-factor formula based on a state's relative share of total unemployed, excess unemployed, and long-term unemployed.
Notice: These are estimated grants only. These estimates are provided solely to assist in comparisons of the relative impact of alternative formulas and funding levels in the legislative process. They are not intended to predict specific amounts states will receive.
1. |
Relevant proposed statutory language is included in Title IX, Subtitle A, of H.R. 1; Title VIII of S.Amdt. 570; and Title VIII of the conference report for H.R. 1. |
2. |
Textual and data analysis of the ARRA is based on H.R. 1 as passed by the House of Representatives, January 28, 2009, available online at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&docid=f:h1ih.txt.pdf. Textual and data analysis of S.Amdt. 570 is based on the version released by the Senate Committee on Appropriations, February 9, 2009, available online at http://appropriations.senate.gov/News/2009_02_09_Substitute_Amendment_to_HR1_%7BCollins_Nelson_Amendment%7D.pdf?CFID=5810469&CFTOKEN=89153593. Textual and data analysis of conference report to accompany H.R. 1 is based on the version released by the House Committee on Rules, February 13, 2009, available online at http://www.house.gov/billtext/hr1_legtext_cr.pdf. |
3. |
For additional information about programs for Title I of WIA, see CRS Report RL33687, The Workforce Investment Act (WIA): Program-by-Program Overview and Funding of Title I Training Programs, by [author name scrubbed]. |
4. |
As specified in the statutory formulas for state allotments for WIA Youth Activities, a total allotment in excess of $1 billion would trigger a change in the allocation formula; however, the ARRA specifies the formula allocation is to remain the same as if the total allocation were less than $1 billion. |
5. |
Although the ARRA specifically excludes funding for Youth Opportunity Grants, the most recent appropriation for these grants was FY2003. |
6. |
See footnote 4. |
7. |
Although it is not identified specifically in the legislation, the Senate Appropriations Committee Report indicates that these funds are to be used for grants authorized under WIA Section 173(a)(1), which refers to workers affected by major economic dislocations, such as plant closures or mass layoffs. |
8. |
The YouthBuild program includes an education component and occupational skills training component for youth ages 16 through 24. At least three-quarters of enrolled youth must be school dropouts and either low-income, in foster care (or have "aged out" of foster care), an offender, disabled, children of incarcerated parents, or migrants. S. 336 authorizes the program to serve youth who have dropped out of school and "re-enrolled in an alternative school, if that re-enrollment is part of a sequential service strategy." The accompanying report to S. 336 (S.Rept. 111-3) does not clarify whether these newly eligible youth could forgo participating in the educational component of the program and/or dually enroll in both YouthBuild's educational component and a separate alternative school. The report does not define the term "sequential service strategy." |
9. |
These industries are specified in WIA Section 171(e)(1)(B)(ii), as amended by the Green Jobs Act of 2007 (Title X of P.L. 110-140). |
10. |
Local employment service (ES) offices are known by different names, such as Employment Service, Job Service, One-Stop Career Center, and Workforce Development Center. These offices offer an array of services to job seekers and employers, including career counseling, job search workshops, labor market information, job listings, applicant screening, and referrals to job openings. States provide ES services through three tiers of service delivery: self-service, facilitated self-help, and staff-assisted. As the names of the tiers imply, progressively more active staff involvement is required as services range from internet job postings to career counseling. Funds for the ES are allocated to states by a formula using civilian labor force and unemployment data. This report will not provide a state-by-state estimate of the distribution of ES funds due to current limits on CRS modeling capacity for this program. |