ȱ
—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱ
ž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
Š—Ž–Š›’Žȱž•ŸŽ¢ȱ
™ŽŒ’Š•’œȱ’—ȱ’—ȱ˜•’Œ¢ȱ
˜‹ȱ¢”Žȱ

ȱ
Ž‹›žŠ›¢ȱŗŝǰȱŘŖŖşȱ
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŝȬśŝŖŖȱ
   ǯŒ›œǯ˜Ÿȱ
ŚŖŗŜśȱ
ȱŽ™˜›ȱ˜›ȱ˜—›Žœœ
Pr
epared for Members and Committees of Congress

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
ž––Š›¢ȱ
When workers lose their job, they can also lose their health insurance. For people with good
health and luck, loss of insurance might not matter as much since they would not use much health
care anyway. However, for people who have health problems or are injured, loss of coverage can
be serious. Without insurance, people often have difficulty obtaining needed care and problems
paying for the care they receive. Unemployed people who cannot postpone care may incur large
bills that add to their financial distress.
The 111th Congress has passed legislation that begins to address this problem. The American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, signed into law on February 17, includes: (1)
premium subsidies to help the unemployed afford health insurance coverage from their former
employer, (2) extension of Transitional Medical Assistance (TMA) under Medicaid through 2010,
and (3) an increase to the Health Coverage Tax Credit (HCTC) and extension of HCTC eligibility
to service sector workers. In addition to this legislation, other bills have been introduced in the
Senate (S. 29, S. 281) which would do one or more of the following: increase the HCTC, extend
eligibility for HCTC to COBRA enrollees, and/or temporarily extend the continuation period for
COBRA. In addition, several other bills introduced so far might provide some assistance through
either incremental or comprehensive changes, even though they are not focused on the
unemployed.
Future legislative solutions face three broad challenges. First, the unemployed are a diverse
population in terms of age, gender, marital status, income, and other characteristics. These
attributes indicate that the unemployed likely have different health care needs and different
capacities to pay for care and insurance. Over a quarter of the unemployed are under age 25, a
group that as a whole is relatively healthy, while about a third are age 45 or older. About 40% of
households that receive unemployment compensation have incomes under $25,000, while about
30% have incomes greater than $50,000. Some people are unemployed for a short period of time,
others for years. The diversity makes it difficult to craft targeted remedies that are both equitable
and effective.
A second challenge is that many people do not lose health insurance when they lose their job
since their employers did not provide it. While sometimes people choose jobs without insurance
because they do not want it, other times these jobs are their only options. Among the groups less
likely to have employment-based insurance are workers in the leisure and hospitality industry,
part-time workers, and people who were previously family caregivers. Whether legislation should
provide assistance to the unemployed in general or just to those who lost coverage involves
difficult cost and equity issues, as well as debate over whether they should be helped to obtain
public or private insurance.
A third challenge is whether legislation should build upon existing federal programs and
provisions or should create new solutions. Building upon what is established might be appropriate
given the immediate needs of the unemployed and their families, but new approaches might allow
solutions that some consider preferable.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
˜—Ž—œȱ
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Diversity of The Unemployed Population....................................................................................... 2
Age ............................................................................................................................................ 2
Marital Status and Gender......................................................................................................... 3
Duration of Unemployment ...................................................................................................... 4
Health Status ............................................................................................................................. 4
Income....................................................................................................................................... 5
Some Policy Implications ......................................................................................................... 6
The Link Between Health Insurance Coverage and Unemployment .............................................. 7
Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance by Industry: Implications for the Unemployed .......... 7
Health Insurance Coverage For Those Entering the Labor Force............................................. 8
Other At-Risk Groups ............................................................................................................... 9
Involuntary Part-Time Workers .......................................................................................... 9
Discouraged Workers.......................................................................................................... 9
Some Policy Implications ......................................................................................................... 9
Current Programs and Provisions That Assist Some Unemployed with Health Insurance ........... 10
COBRA ................................................................................................................................... 10
Health Coverage Tax Credit .....................................................................................................11
Medicaid...................................................................................................................................11
Itemized Deduction for Medical Expenses ............................................................................. 12
Health Savings Accounts......................................................................................................... 12
Individual Retirement Accounts.............................................................................................. 13
What Direction for Current Legislation .................................................................................. 13
Legislation Introduced in the 111th Congress ................................................................................ 14
Bills Directly Related to Providing Assistance to the Unemployed for the Purpose of
Health Insurance Coverage .................................................................................................. 14
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 .................................................. 14
Other Legislative Proposals .............................................................................................. 15
Bills of More General Nature that Might Provide Some Assistance....................................... 16

’ž›Žœȱ
Figure 1. Characteristics of the Unemployed by Gender and Marital Status, January
2009.............................................................................................................................................. 3

Š‹•Žœȱ
Table 1. Distribution of Unemployed by Age.................................................................................. 2
Table 2. Percent Reporting Perceived Health Status by Age........................................................... 5
Table 3. Unemployment Compensation Benefits By Household Income, 2005 ............................. 6
Table 4. Employer-Sponsored Insurance Coverage of Workers, By Industry ................................. 8
Table 5. Major Provisions—American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ........................ 15
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ

˜—ŠŒœȱ
Author Contact Information .......................................................................................................... 16
Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................................... 16
Key Policy Staff ............................................................................................................................ 17

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
—›˜žŒ’˜—ȱ
The nation’s unemployment rate reached a 16-year high of 7.6% in January 2009, and is expected
by many to continue to climb. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the unemployment
rate may reach 9% by 2010.1
One consequence of unemployment is that people can also lose their health insurance. The danger
of losing insurance is most obvious for coverage that is provided by employers, but people who
become unemployed might no longer be able to pay individual market premiums as well. Recent
estimates indicate for each percentage point increase in the unemployment rate, the number of
uninsured would increase by 1.1 million.2 Loss of insurance might not matter to people with good
health and luck since they would not be using much health care anyway. However, for people
who have health problems or are injured, loss of coverage can be serious. Without insurance,
people often have difficulty obtaining needed care and problems paying for the care they receive.
Unemployed people who cannot postpone care may incur large bills that add to their financial
distress.3
Legislative solutions face three broad challenges. First, the unemployed are a diverse population
with different health care needs and different capacities to pay for care and insurance. Their
differences makes it difficult to craft targeted remedies that are both equitable and effective.
Second, many people do not lose health insurance when they lose their job since their employers
did not provide it. Whether legislation should provide assistance to the unemployed in general or
just to those who lost coverage involves difficult cost and equity issues, as well as debate over
whether they should be helped to obtain public or private insurance. A third challenge is whether
legislation should build upon existing federal programs and provisions or should create new
solutions. Building upon what is established might be appropriate given immediate needs, but
new approaches might allow solutions that some consider preferable.
This report contains information and analysis that might inform debate over these challenges. It is
divided into four parts:
• Analysis showing the diversity of the unemployed population,
• Analysis showing the relationship between unemployment and loss of employer-
sponsored health insurance
• Summaries of current federal programs and provisions that can assist some
unemployed obtain or retain health insurance, and
• Summaries of relevant legislation in the 111th Congress.
The report will be updated to reflect legislative changes, which may occur frequently at times. It
will be also be updated to reflect additional analysis.

1 Congressional Budget Office, Economic Projections for 2009 to 2019, January 2009.
2 Dorn, S. “Medicaid, SCHIP and Economic Downturn: Policy Challenges and Policy Responses, “ Kaiser Commission
on Medicaid and the Uninsured, 2008 (#7770).
3 The Commonwealth Fund, Losing Ground: How the Loss of Adequate Health Insurance is Burdening Working
Families
, August 2008.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŗȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
’ŸŽ›œ’¢ȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ—Ž–™•˜¢Žȱ˜™ž•Š’˜—ȱ
The unemployed population now totals 11.6 million people.4 They are a diverse population in
terms of age, gender, marital status, income and other characteristics. These attributes indicate
that they likely have different health care needs and different capacities to pay for care and
insurance. This section will first describe the diversity of the unemployed within various
demographic categories and then briefly discuss some policy implications.
Žȱ
Table 1 shows the ages of people who were unemployed as of January 2008 and 2009.
• Over one-quarter of the unemployed (27%) are age 16 to 24, while 23% are ages
25 to 34. About one-third are over age 45 (31%).
• However, compared to a year ago, unemployed workers are increasingly older.
• The share of the unemployed ages 25 and older was 73% as of January 2009,
compared to 66% a year ago.
• Within this age group the highest rate of unemployment is for the 25 to
34 year olds, which one would consider a younger and likelier to be a
healthier population.
• While older Americans generally experience lower rates of unemployment
than their younger counterparts, those ages 55 and older have been the fastest
growing segment of the unemployed over the past year.
Table 1. Distribution of Unemployed by Age
Unemployment

% Distribution Of Unemployed
Rate
Age
January 2008
January 2009
January 2009
16 to 24
34%
27%
15.6
25 and older
66%
73%
6.4




25 to 34
22%
22%
7.9
35 to 44
17%
19%
6.5
45 to 54
16%
18%
5.9
55 +
11%
13%
5.2
Source: BLS, Employment Situation, January, 2009.


4 Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment Situation For January 2009.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
Řȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
The age distribution of the unemployed can affect their probability of needing health care services
and the availability of other financial resources while unemployed. The younger unemployed will
most likely incur lower health care expenditures and may rely more on parents for family
assistance as compared to their older counterparts. According to the a 2007 census survey, 55% of
males and 48% of females ages 18 to 24 still live with their parents.
Š›’Š•ȱŠžœȱŠ—ȱ Ž—Ž›ȱ
Figure 1 shows the unemployed by marital status, gender and the presence of children in a
household.
• The majority of the unemployed are single men (38%) and single women account
for 18% of the unemployed.
• Married women account for 15% and married men comprise 20% of the
unemployed.
• Single women with children comprise another 9% of the unemployed.
Figure 1. Characteristics of the Unemployed by Gender and Marital Status,
January 2009
Single women
No family
Married Men
18%
20%
Married women
15%
Single men
Single Women
38%
w/ Children
9%

Source: BLS, Employment Situation, January 2009

Marital status has a direct impact on the probability of the unemployed continuing to be covered
by health insurance. Those that are married (or heads of household) may be providing the main
source of health insurance coverage for their families. Those most at-risk in this category are
single mothers who are head of household and unemployed. Their loss of coverage reduces the
availability of employer-sponsored coverage to their children. Some may, however, be eligible for
public assistance through Medicaid or State Children Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) (see
discussion below). On the other hand, those married with a spouse who still has a job and health
insurance coverage, may allow him or her to enroll in their spouse’s plan.

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
řȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
ž›Š’˜—ȱ˜ȱ—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱ
The duration of unemployment has increased over the past year.
• As of January 2009, 39% of the unemployed had been unemployed for 15 weeks
or longer. Nearly 1 in 5 (22%) were unemployed for more than 6 months, this
compares to 18% with a similar duration in unemployment a year earlier.
• Educational attainment of the unemployed may affect how quickly they can find
another job. Less skilled, less educated people may find it more difficult to find
employment.
• The majority of the unemployed (37%) were high school graduates as of
January 2009.
• The second highest group are the unemployed had some college or an
associate degree (27%). About 1 in 5 unemployed (20%) had a bachelor’s
degree or higher, while 17% of the unemployed did not have a high school
diploma.
The longer one stays unemployed and uninsured, the greater may be the delay in seeking medical
treatment 5 (see discussion on health status below).
ŽŠ•‘ȱŠžœȱ
The health status of the unemployed is dependent on whether or not they have health insurance
coverage, their demographic composition, and the duration of their unemployment.
• In 2007, about half of those individuals looking for work were uninsured.6
• As noted earlier, the unemployed today tend to be older than a year ago. Since
age and health status are strongly correlated, they may also be less healthy. Table
2
reports on data by perceived health status by age (regardless of employment
status).
• Of those ages 25 to 44, 9% report they are in fair to poor health. Whereas, of
those ages 45 to 64, 16% report they are in fair to poor health.
• Finally, as noted earlier, the unemployed today tend to have longer durations of
unemployment, which may further delay necessary medical treatment.


5 The Commonwealth Fund, Losing Ground: How the Loss of Adequate Health Insurance is Burdening Working
Families
, August 2008.
6 CRS Analysis of the 2008 March Supplement to the Current Population Survey.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
Śȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
Table 2. Percent Reporting Perceived Health Status by Age

Perceived Health Status
Very
Age Excellent
Good
Good
Fair
Poor
18 to 24
38% 35% 22% 4% 1%
25 to 44
28% 37% 27% 7% 2%
45 to 64
20% 33% 30% 11% 5%
Source: 2006 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
Studies show that more than 70% of adults with gaps in health care coverage tend to forgo needed
care because of cost, up from just over half in 2001. Uninsured adults are also less likely than
those with insurance to obtain screening such as blood pressure, cholesterol, and cancer screening
than their insured counterparts.7 These problems may be further exacerbated among the older
unemployed and/or those with longer durations of unemployment.
—Œ˜–Žȱ
Individuals who become unemployed may be eligible for unemployment compensation (UC).
Eligibility, benefit amount, and duration for unemployment compensation is determined by each
state.8
• Generally, UC benefits are based on wages for covered work over a 12-month
period. Most state benefit formulas replace half of a claimant’s average weekly
wage up to a weekly maximum.
• The average regular UC benefit duration as of December 2008 was 15 weeks. In
December 2008, approximately 5 million unemployed workers received UC
benefits in a given week.
Data on the income characteristics of those currently unemployed is not available. However,
according to the most recent data from the Internal Revenue Service, the annual average
unemployment compensation benefit was $3,524 in 2005 (see Table 3).
• Nearly 40% had household income below $25,000 and 30% of those who
received unemployment compensation benefits were paid with income of
$50,000 and over.



7 The Commonwealth Fund, Losing Ground: How the Loss of Adequate Health Insurance is Burdening Working
Families
, August 2008.
8 CRS Report RS22538, Unemployment Compensation: The Cornerstone of Income Support for Unemployed Workers,
by Julie M. Whittaker.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
śȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
Table 3. Unemployment Compensation Benefits By Household Income, 2005
Household Incomea Number (in 1,000s) Distribution by Income Average Annual Benefit
Less than $10,000
775
9.4%
$2,423
$10,000 to $15,000
865
10.7%
$3,015
$15,000 to $20,000
818
10.1%
$3,422
$20,000 to $25,000
758
9.4%
$3,487
$25,000 to $30,000
676
8.4%
$3,537
$30,000 to $40,000
955
11.8%
$3,707
$40,000 to $50,000
758
9.4%
$3,727
$50.000 to $100,000
1,944
24.1%
$3,766
$100,000 and over
536
6.6%
$4,597
Total 8,065
100%
$3,524
Source: CRS analysis of data from the Congressional Budget Office.
a. Represents individual, couple or family income where income is defined as adjusted gross income plus
statutory adjustments, tax-exempt interest, and nontaxable Social Security benefits.

The availability of other forms of income for the unemployed is important to their ability to pay
for health insurance coverage or health care services directly out-of-pocket. Unemployment
compensation by itself is most likely insufficient to pay for these costs. Beyond unemployment
compensation, individuals also may draw down their savings (including retirement savings) to
pay for household expenses. These savings, however, have faced financial strains of their own.
Recent estimates show that retirement savings, one of the largest sources of savings, have lost
nearly a third of their value over the past year. 9
˜–Žȱ˜•’Œ¢ȱ –™•’ŒŠ’˜—œȱ
One approach to helping the unemployed retain or obtain health insurance is to provide assistance
to everyone who loses their job. However, in an environment of limited resources, some policy
makers might prefer to target assistance on the unemployed who have the greatest needs. The
diversity described above indicates that this approach might raise some complex issues:
• Should older unemployed workers be given higher priority (or maybe larger
subsidies) since on average they have higher health care expenditures? In
general, this approach might provide the greatest benefit per dollar spent.
However, some younger workers also have high costs, and some older workers
may have more assets.
• Should higher priority be given people who are out of work a long time? They
often have greater financial need and arguably people might be expected to pay
health care costs for the first few months of unemployment. On the other hand,
some people need immediate assistance to avoid unbroken insurance coverage,
which could prevent application of pre-existing condition exclusions.

9 Mauricio Soto, How is The Financial Crises Affecting Retirement Savings, Urban Institute, December 10, 2008.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
Ŝȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
• Should equal assistance be provided to all unemployed, or should more help be
given to those with lower incomes? Should there be an income limit to receiving
any assistance at all? Some current forms of assistance (such as the Health
Coverage Tax Credit, described below on page 11) are not adjusted or limited by
income, nor is the income tax exclusion for employer-provided coverage.10
Limitations would likely involve administrative complexity, such as defining and
measuring income. However, some would argue that new subsidies should be
viewed as a form of means-tested payments to be focused on those most in need.
‘Žȱ’—”ȱŽ ŽŽ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽȱ˜ŸŽ›ŠŽȱŠ—ȱ
—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱ
While some people lose health insurance when they lose their job, either because they could not
continue their employer-sponsored coverage or could not pay for it, other unemployed had no
coverage to lose since their employer did not provide it. Sometimes people choose jobs without
insurance because they do not want it, but other times these jobs are their only options.
Complicating the link between coverage and unemployment are other at-risk groups who are not
technically unemployed but who may not have coverage due to change in work status. These
groups include involuntary part-time workers and discouraged workers who no longer seek
employment.
–™•˜¢Ž›Ȭ™˜—œ˜›Žȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽȱ‹¢ȱ —žœ›¢DZȱ –™•’ŒŠ’˜—œȱ
˜›ȱ‘Žȱ—Ž–™•˜¢Žȱȱ
Employment-based health insurance does represent an important source of coverage to workers
and their dependents. In 2007, about 71% of workers received employment-based coverage from
an employer, either in their own name (53%) or as a dependent of another family member’s
employer (17%).11 Certain characteristics of the unemployed increase the likelihood of losing
employer-sponsored coverage.
A closer look at the industry characteristics of the unemployed provides some insight into their
health insurance status prior to becoming unemployed. Those most likely to have lost employer
sponsored coverage are the nearly 5 million unemployed who report that they have been
permanently laid off from their jobs.
• Permanently laid-off workers represent nearly half (49%) of unemployed workers
as of January 2009.
• 75% of unemployed workers had previously worked in manufacturing, retail,
construction, professional and business services, leisure and hospitality.

10 For more information on the tax exclusion, see CRS Report RL34767, The Tax Exclusion for Employer-Provided
Health Insurance: Policy Issues Regarding the Repeal Debate
, by Bob Lyke.
11 EBRI, Sources of Health Insurance and Characteristics of the Uninsured: Analysis of the March 2008 Current
Population Survey
, September, 2008.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŝȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
• Workers laid off in the manufacturing and information sectors had the highest
likelihood of having health insurance from their previous employer (see
Table 4).
• Workers laid of in the leisure and hospitality, construction and wholesale and
retail trade sectors were less likely to have health insurance from their
previous employer prior to being laid off.
• 13% of the unemployed have been temporarily laid off. These workers may still
have access to health insurance and other employer-provided benefits (if they
were available prior to their change in work status).
• 8% of the unemployed left their jobs voluntarily.
Table 4. Employer-Sponsored Insurance Coverage of Workers, By Industry
Share of Workers in
Industry with Employer
% Unemployed, Sponsored Insurance in their
% Uninsured while
Industry
January, 2009
Own Name, 2007
Employed, 2007
Total
100% 53%
17%




Manufacturing
10.9% 69%
13%
Information
7.4% 67%
11%
Transportation
/Utilities
8.4% 63%
16%
Financial
Activities
6.0% 61%
9%
Professional and
Business Services
10.4% 49%
19%
Wholesale/ Retail
Trade
8.7% 47%
19%
Construction
18.2% 40%
34%
Leisure and
11.6% 28%
28%
Hospitality
Source: Unemployment data derived from BLS, Employment Situation, Dec. 2008. Percent with employer-
sponsored coverage and uninsured calculated by CRS from March 2008 Current Population Survey.
ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽȱ˜ŸŽ›ŠŽȱ˜›ȱ‘˜œŽȱ—Ž›’—ȱ‘ŽȱŠ‹˜›ȱ˜›ŒŽȱȱ
Those considered unemployed include individuals entering or re-entering the workforce.
Nearly one-third of the unemployed are just entering the labor force either for the first
time (6.8%) or re-entering after being out for some time (24%). This later group most
likely include family caregivers returning to work, retirees returning to work to
supplement their income in the “down” economy, or those returning after an extended
illness. Those entering or the re-entering the labor force, most likely did not lose
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
Şȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
employer-sponsored coverage in their own name.12 Many may have coverage through
their spouse, parents, retiree-health through their prior employer, or were uninsured.13
‘Ž›ȱȬ’œ”ȱ ›˜ž™œȱ
Legislative proposals to help the unemployed with health insurance typically focus on people
who do not have a job and are actively searching for work. They may or may not be receiving (or
have received) unemployment benefits. However, there are others who may be without health
insurance due to a change in work status: the involuntary part-time worker and the discouraged
worker who has left the workforce altogether.
—Ÿ˜•ž—Š›¢ȱŠ›Ȭ’–Žȱ˜›”Ž›œȱ
• The number of involuntary part-time workers have nearly doubled over the past
year to 7.3 million. These are individuals who wanted to work full-time but
instead had to work part-time.
• Involuntary part-time workers report two reasons for not working full-time:
• 74% report it is due to slack work of their current employer (a reduction in
hours in response to unfavorable business conditions)
• 21% report they cannot find full-time employment due to economic reasons.
’œŒ˜ž›ŠŽȱ˜›”Ž›œȱ
• Another group that raises concerns with respect to health insurance coverage are
discouraged workers—persons not currently looking for work because they
believe jobs are not available for them.
• As of January 2009, there were 739,000 discouraged workers. This number has
more than doubled over the past year. 14
˜–Žȱ˜•’Œ¢ȱ –™•’ŒŠ’˜—œȱ
As discussed above, some people lose employer-sponsored health insurance when they lose their
job, but other unemployed did not have coverage to begin with. In addition, there are involuntary
part-time workers and discouraged workers who do not have coverage. Should all of these groups
be given assistance, or should some be given higher priority? Several issues are involved:
• In general, there appears to be a trade-off between concerns about cost and
concerns about equity. Providing assistance to all the groups mentioned above
would cost more than helping just those who lost employer-sponsored coverage,
but on grounds of equity it may be difficult to justify not helping all. At the same

12 Some could have retiree-health coverage from a prior employer and some could still be purchasing COBRA
coverage.
13 See CRS Report RL34596, Health Insurance Coverage of People Aged 55 to 64, by Chris L. Peterson.
14 BLS, Employment Situation, January 2009, Published February 6, 2009.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
şȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
time, there is something to be said for giving higher priority to those who
recently had coverage if the immediate goal is not to allow things to get worse.
• If assistance is given to those who did not have employer-sponsored coverage,
what form of coverage should they have? Should they be enrolled in public
programs such as Medicaid or Medicare (for those near age 65), or should they
be permitted private insurance options? If the latter were allowed, what benefit
and consumer protection standards might apply?
ž››Ž—ȱ›˜›Š–œȱŠ—ȱ›˜Ÿ’œ’˜—œȱ‘Šȱœœ’œȱ˜–Žȱ
—Ž–™•˜¢Žȱ ’‘ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽȱ
Current federal law includes some programs and provisions that might assist the unemployed
with respect to health insurance. The ones that are directly or otherwise closely related include the
following, each of which is briefly summarized and assessed below:
• COBRA
• Health Coverage Tax Credit
• Medicaid
• Itemized Deduction for Medical Expenses
• Health Savings Accounts
• Individual Retirement Accounts
At the end of these summaries and assessments is a brief discussion of whether current solutions
should build upon these current law measures or develop new approaches.
ȱ
Title X of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA)
requires employers with 20 or more employees to provide employees and their families
the right to continue participation in the employer’s group health plan in case of certain
events, one of which is involuntary dismissal. Depending on the triggering event, the
continuation period generally lasts up to 18 or 36 months.15
• One attraction of COBRA for the unemployed is that they can continue in the
health plan they had while working; this is especially important when the plan is
linked to particular doctors and other providers. Employer plans have group
rates, which often are lower than individual market insurance premiums when
people are older or have health conditions.

15 CRS Report R40142, Health Insurance Continuation Coverage Under COBRA, by Janet Kinzer. Forty states have
continuation laws of their own which extend federal COBRA protections to some firms, including firms with 20 or
fewer employees. Kaiser Family Foundation, Expanded COBRA Continuation Coverage for Small Firm Employees,
2007.
[http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparetable.jsp?cat=7&ind=357&typ=5].
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŗŖȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
• A limitation of COBRA for the unemployed is that covered individuals usually
must pay 102% of the health plan’s full premium (i.e., both the employee’s and
the employer’s share, plus 2%). Premiums can consume a large part of the
unemployment benefit, or even exceed it in the case of family coverage.16 In
addition, employers find that people with higher than average health care needs
are more likely to elect COBRA coverage, so the actual cost may substantially
exceed the plan premium. (ARRA ’09 provides a 65% premium subsidy to
unemployed workers, see discussion below).
ŽŠ•‘ȱ˜ŸŽ›ŠŽȱŠ¡ȱ›Ž’ȱ
The Health Coverage Tax Credit (HCTC) is an individual income tax credit that is both
refundable (allowing taxpayers to receive the full amount regardless of their tax liability) and
advanceable to health plans (allowing taxpayers to benefit from the credit while they have
coverage, not after they file their returns the next year). The 65% credit (temporarily set at 80%
under ARRA ’09, see discussion below) can be applied to premiums for ten types of health
insurance, three of which (including COBRA) are available nationwide but seven of which first
require state approval. Eligible taxpayers must be receiving Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
benefits (or would be except they have not exhausted their unemployment benefits), Alternative
Trade Adjustment Assistance benefits, or pension benefits being paid because the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation has taken over their pension plan. Individuals are not eligible if they are
enrolled in employer subsidized insurance, Medicare Part B, Medicaid, or SCHIP (among others)
or of they are entitled to Medicare Part A (among others).17
• One attraction of the HCTC for the unemployed is that the 65% rate applies
regardless of annual income, which can help people who have income earned in
the year prior to unemployment or who have a spouse who remains employed.
• Limitations of the HCTC for the unemployed include the narrow eligibility
categories, short eligibility periods for some TAA beneficiaries (eligibility can
range from less than a year to over two years, depending on residence and other
circumstances), and the inability of cash-strapped taxpayers to pay the remaining
35% of the premium.18 (ARRA ’09 extends eligibility to trade-affected service
sector workers, see discussion below).
Ž’ŒŠ’ȱ
Medicaid is an entitlement program that is targeted toward low-income households. It finances
health and long-term care services primarily for the elderly, people with disabilities, members of
families with dependent children, and certain other pregnant women and children. Participants
must meet low income and sometimes limited resource or asset tests that are established by states

16 Squeezed! Caught between Unemployment Benefits and Health Care Costs. Families USA January 2009.
17 The HCTC eligibility rules are complex. For more information, see CRS Report RL32620, Health Coverage Tax
Credit Authorized by the Trade Act of 2002
, by Bernadette Fernandez.
18 For more information about the limitations of the HCTC, see Stan Dorn, Health Coverage Tax Credits: A Small
Program Offering Large Policy Lessons.
The Urban Institute (February, 2008).
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŗŗȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
within federal guidelines. States must cover certain categorical groups and provide various
defined services, but they have options to cover other groups and add other services.19
• One attraction of Medicaid for the unemployed is that the program can pay for a
wide range of medically-necessary treatments, usually with small deductibles or
copayments relative to employment-based coverage.
• A limitation of Medicaid for the unemployed is that they might not meet income
and asset tests the states impose, and some (such as childless, non-disabled
adults) might not be categorically eligible. In addition, the doctors they had prior
to becoming unemployed might not accept Medicaid.
Ž–’£ŽȱŽžŒ’˜—ȱ˜›ȱŽ’ŒŠ•ȱ¡™Ž—œŽœȱȱ
Taxpayers who itemize their deductions may deduct unreimbursed medical expenses that exceed
7.5% of their adjusted gross income.20 Medical expenses include direct payments to providers,
insurance deductibles and copayments, and insurance premiums, among other things. The federal
income tax provision just described is also followed by most state income tax systems, providing
additional tax savings.
• One attraction of the itemized deduction for the unemployed is that it has no
employment-related eligibility tests; some people who have lost full-time jobs
but are not defined as unemployed (such as those who can only find intermittent
part-time work) could still use it.
• A limitation of the itemized deduction is that one must itemize deductions to use
it; most lower-income taxpayers find that their standard deduction is larger. The
7.5% adjusted gross income floor further limits its use. In addition, deductions
result in relatively low tax savings for lower income taxpayers since their
marginal tax rates are relatively low.
ŽŠ•‘ȱŠŸ’—œȱŒŒ˜ž—œȱ
Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) are tax-advantaged accounts that people can use to pay
unreimbursed medical expenses such as deductibles, copayments, and services not covered by
insurance. Contributions, which are either excluded from taxes (if by employers) or deductible (if
by individuals) can be made only when people have qualifying high deductible health insurance;
for most, they are limited to $3,000 for self-only coverage and $5,950 for family coverage.
Amounts not used one year can be rolled over to the next. Withdrawals used to pay health
insurance premiums usually are taxable, but not when one is receiving unemployment benefits or
within a COBRA continuation period.21

19 For more information, see CRS Report RL33202, Medicaid: A Primer, by Elicia J. Herz and CRS Report RL31698,
Transitional Medical Assistance (TMA) Under Medicaid, by April Grady.
20 For taxpayers who are subject to the alternative minimum tax, as middle income families increasingly are, the
income floor is higher, 10% of adjusted gross income.
21 For more information about HSAs, see CRS Report RL33257, Health Savings Accounts: Overview of Rules for 2008,
by Bob Lyke.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŗŘȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
• One attraction of HSAs for the unemployed (or who might become so in the
future) is that if regular contributions are made people could accumulate a
balance that can be used as a rainy day health care fund. Unlike other individual
health care funds, HSAs are portable and not tied to continued employment.
• A limitation of HSAs for the unemployed is that one must have high deductible
insurance (deductibles of at least $1,150 for single coverage or $2,300 for family
coverage in 2009) to make contributions; many people are reluctant to accept this
risk even though high deductible insurance premiums are somewhat lower.
People with high deductible insurance often do not contribute to an HSA or, if
they do, they use the money soon afterwards and cannot build up substantial
balances.
—’Ÿ’žŠ•ȱŽ’›Ž–Ž—ȱŒŒ˜ž—œȱ
Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) are tax-advantaged accounts to help people save for
retirement. Contributions to Traditional IRAs are deductible (depending on income and whether
one participates in other retirement plans), though after-tax contributions are also allowed.
Distributions are taxable (aside from sums attributable to after-tax contributions) and subject to
an additional 10% penalty if occurring before age 59 and one-half. In contrast, contributions to
Roth IRAs are not deductible though distributions of contributions (always deemed to come first)
are tax-exempt, as are distributions of earnings after age 59 and one-half. Early distributions of
earning are taxable and subject to an additional 10% penalty. For 2009, contribution limits for
both types of IRAs generally are $5,000 plus an additional $1,000 for those age 50 and over. For
both types of IRAs, the 10% early withdrawal penalty is waived for several reasons, including
unreimbursed medical expenses exceeding 7.5% of adjusted gross income and distributions that
are less than health insurance premiums paid after loss of a job.22
• One attraction of IRAs for the unemployed is that one does not need to get prior
approval before withdrawing funds.
• A limitation of IRAs for the unemployed is that distributions to pay medical
expenses likely would be taxed; it is only the penalty tax that is waived. Once
withdrawn, funds cannot be repaid, so there will be less money available for
retirement.
‘Šȱ’›ŽŒ’˜—ȱ˜›ȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱ
An issue for helping unemployed people with health insurance is whether it is better to
build upon these enacted provisions and programs or to develop new solutions. The
principal advantage of the former approach is that often it is easier to modify current law
than it is to design new initiatives and draft legislative language that would effectively
carry them out. Current law can provide a starting point that is based upon a legislative
consensus, though this is not always the case. A second advantage of building upon
enacted provisions and programs is that administrative procedures and legal
interpretations are already in place. For example, states already have procedures for
measuring income for determining Medicaid eligibility. Responsibilities and assignments

22 For additional information see CRS Report RL31770, Individual Retirement Accounts and 401(k) Plans: Early
Withdrawals and Required Distributions
, by Patrick Purcell.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŗřȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
will change, but they need not be created anew. New agencies or offices do not have to be
established.
On the other hand, current provisions and programs may have features that might not be
optimal for helping some unemployed have health insurance. For example, COBRA
establishes the right to continue with coverage offered by the prior employer; it does not
establish a right to guaranteed issue of health insurance available under state law.
(Guaranteed issue of the latter was later established by the Health Insurance Portability
and Accountability Act, or HIPAA). As a consequence, subsidies tied to COBRA cannot
be used for individual market insurance, even though some unemployed would find that
preferable. Expanding eligibility for Medicaid ties individuals to both the strengths and
limitations of that program. For example, Medicaid is especially helpful to individuals
who could not obtain private insurance; at the same time, people with Medicaid
sometimes have difficulty finding doctors who will see them.
Ž’œ•Š’˜—ȱ —›˜žŒŽȱ’—ȱ‘Žȱŗŗŗ‘ȱ˜—›Žœœȱ
The following discusses key legislation enacted and other proposals introduced in the current
Congress that could provide some assistance to the unemployed regarding health insurance. The
first set of bills has provisions that are directly aimed at providing assistance to the unemployed,
while the second has provisions of a more general nature that might help some.
’••œȱ’›ŽŒ•¢ȱŽ•ŠŽȱ˜ȱ›˜Ÿ’’—ȱœœ’œŠ—ŒŽȱ˜ȱ‘Žȱ—Ž–™•˜¢Žȱ
˜›ȱ‘Žȱž›™˜œŽȱ˜ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽȱ˜ŸŽ›ŠŽȱ
‘Žȱ–Ž›’ŒŠ—ȱŽŒ˜ŸŽ›¢ȱŠ—ȱŽ’—ŸŽœ–Ž—ȱŒȱ˜ȱŘŖŖşȱ
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 was signed into law by
President Obama on February 17 and reflects the conference agreement passed by the 111th
Congress (H.R. 1. as reported in H.Rept. 111-16). ARRA ‘09 includes the following:
• Temporary premium subsidies of 65% for 9 months to help the unemployed
afford COBRA coverage from their former employer.23 To qualify a worker must
be involuntarily unemployed between September 1, 2008, and December 31,
2009. The subsidy would terminate upon offer of any new employer-sponsored
health care coverage or Medicare eligibility. Workers who were involuntarily
terminated between September 1, 2008, and the date of enactment, but failed to
initially elect COBRA are to be notified by their former employer that they are
entitled to elect COBRA and receive the subsidy. The subsidy is phased-out for
workers whose annual household adjusted gross income exceeds $125,000 for
single filers and $250,000 for joint filers.
• Extension of Transitional Medical Assistance (TMA) under Medicaid through
2010.

23 The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the COBRA subsidy provision in ARRA 09, which would apply to
state continuation laws as well, would cost $24.7 billion over FY2009-FY2013.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŗŚȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
• Extension of Trade Adjustment Assistance to service-sector workers who lost
their jobs due to increased foreign imports or shifts in production outside the U.S.
and an increase in the HCTC to 80% for all TAA eligible beneficiaries (from its
current rate of 65%).
Table 5 shows the key differences between the House and Senate ARRA legislation and the final
legislation passed by the two chambers and signed by the President.
Table 5. Major Provisions—American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
H.R. 1 as
Major Provisions
H.R. 1 as first
amended in
H.R. 1 as enacted
passed in House Senate (S. Amdt. (H. Rept 111-16)
570)
Temporary COBRA Subsidy for
65% subsidy for 12 50% subsidy for 12 65% subsidy for 9
Involuntary Unemployed (12 months)
months no income months no income months with
limits
limits
income limits

Extension of COBRA Continuation
Included
Not Included
Not Included
Coverage for 55+ and Long-Tenured
Employees
Extend Transitional Medical Assistance
Included Included Included
Under Medicaid
Expand Medicaid to 4 Groups of
Included
Not included
Not included
Unemployed Workers
(1) Unemployment Compensation
Recipients
(2) Unemployed who have exhausted
unemployment benefits
(3) Unemployed after September 2008
and have income below 200% of poverty
(4) Unemployed and eligible for food
stamps
Source: CRS analysis of H.R. 1 and S.Amdt. 570 and H.Rept. 111-16.
‘Ž›ȱŽ’œ•Š’ŸŽȱ›˜™˜œŠ•œȱ
• H.R. 694 (Representative Sestak): This bill would temporarily extend COBRA
coverage from 18 months to 24 months.
• S. 29 (Senator Brown): This bill would increase the Health Coverage Tax Credit
rate from 65% to 85%, add COBRA enrollees to the list of taxpayers eligible for
the credit, and extend the COBRA continuation period by 12 months for
enrollees who exhaust their continuation eligibility during calendar year 2009.
• S. 281 (Senator Kohl): This bill would extend COBRA coverage for up to 36
months (until they are eligible for Medicare).
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŗśȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
’••œȱ˜ȱ˜›Žȱ Ž—Ž›Š•ȱŠž›Žȱ‘Šȱ’‘ȱ›˜Ÿ’Žȱ˜–Žȱœœ’œŠ—ŒŽȱ
• H.R. 153 (Representative McHugh): This bill would authorize the establishment
of tax-advantaged worker savings accounts to make payment during periods of
unemployment. (While this legislation would not help those who are currently
unemployed, or soon will be, it could help some who become unemployed in the
future.)
• H.R. 198 (Representative Stearns): This bill would allow taxpayers to deduct the
cost of health insurance and unreimbursed prescription drug purchases from their
federal income taxes. The deduction would not be limited to itemizers.
• H.R. 502 (Representative Bachmann: This bill would allow taxpayers who
itemize to deduct unreimbursed medical expenses, including health insurance
premiums, without the 7.5% adjusted gross income floor in current law.
• H.R. 879 (Representative Granger): This bill would authorize a refundable tax
credit for purchasers of health insurance ($1,000 each for the taxpayer and
spouse plus $500 for each dependent). The credit would be phased out for higher-
income taxpayers.
• H.R. 965 (Representative Kaptur): This bill would (among other things) allow
certain taxpayers with incomes under 200% of federal poverty levels to receive a
refundable tax credit for health insurance.
• S. 207 (Senator Boxer): This bill would allow taxpayers to deduct up to $2,000
($4,000 in the case of a joint return) of the cost of health insurance from their
federal income taxes. The deduction would not be limited to itemizers. The
deduction would be phased out for higher-income taxpayers.
The 111th Congress might also consider comprehensive health care reform. Most broad reform
proposals could include provisions that provide assistance to people who become unemployed,
have low income, or lose employment-based coverage (assuming the latter is still permitted).
Comprehensive reform bills that have been introduced so far include: H.R. 15 (Representative
Dingell), H.R. 193 (Representative Stark), H.R. 676 (Representative Conyers), and S. 391
(Senator Wyden).

ž‘˜›ȱ˜—ŠŒȱ —˜›–Š’˜—ȱ

Janemarie Mulvey
Bob Lyke
Specialist in Aging Policy

jmulvey@crs.loc.gov, 7-6928



Œ”—˜ •Ž–Ž—œȱ
This report was co-authored by Bob Lyke. He can be reached at: 7-7355. Comments were also provided by
Julie Whittaker, Pat Purcell, and Lisa Herz.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŗŜȱ

—Ž–™•˜¢–Ž—ȱŠ—ȱ ŽŠ•‘ȱ —œž›Š—ŒŽDZȱž››Ž—ȱŽ’œ•Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
ȱ
Ž¢ȱ˜•’Œ¢ȱŠȱ
Area of Expertise
Name
Phone E-mail
Medicaid Lisa
Herz
7-1377
eherzz@crs.loc.gov
COBRA Hinda
Chaikind
7-7569
hchaikind@crs.loc.gov
Unemployment Compensation
Julie Whittaker
7-2587 jwhittaker@crs.loc.gov
Health Coverage Tax Credit
Bernadette Fernandez
7-0322
bfernandez@crs.loc.gov
Older Workers and Unemployment
Janemarie Mulvey
7-6928
jmulvey@crs.loc.gov
Trade Adjustment Assistance
John Topoleski
7-2290
jtopoleski@crs.loc.gov





˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŗŝȱ