ȱ
‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ
Ž›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
Ž——Ž‘ȱ Š£–Š—ȱ
™ŽŒ’Š•’œȱ’—ȱ’•ŽȱŠœŽ›—ȱŠ’›œȱ
Š—žŠ›¢ȱŜǰȱŘŖŖşȱ
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŝȬśŝŖŖȱ
   ǯŒ›œǯ˜Ÿȱ
ŘŗşŘŘȱ
ȱŽ™˜›ȱ˜›ȱ˜—›Žœœ
Pr
epared for Members and Committees of Congress

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ
ž––Š›¢ȱ
The central government’s limited writ and perceived corruption are helping sustain a Taliban
insurgency and feeding pessimism about the Afghanistan stabilization effort. However, ethnic
disputes remain confined largely to political debate and competition, enabling President Karzai to
try to focus on improving governance, reversing security deterioration and on his re-election bid
in the fall of 2009. Karzai is running for re-election, but he faces some loss of public confidence
and fluid coalitions of potentially strong election opponents. At the same time, U.S. and Afghan
officials are shifting toward promoting local governing bodies and security initiatives as a
complement to efforts to build central government capabilities. See CRS Report RL30588,
Afghanistan: Post-War Governance, Security, and U.S. Policy, by Kenneth Katzman.


˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ
˜—Ž—œȱ
Post-Conflict Political Transition and Political Landscape ............................................................. 1
Government Performance................................................................................................................ 3
Official Corruption and Compromises With Faction Leaders................................................... 3
Increasing Focus on Local Solutions and Governance ............................................................. 4
Overall Human Rights Issues.................................................................................................... 5
Funding Issues........................................................................................................................... 6
2009 Elections ................................................................................................................................. 6

Š‹•Žœȱ
Table 1. Afghanistan Political Transition Process .......................................................................... 8

˜—ŠŒœȱ
Author Contact Information ............................................................................................................ 9

˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ
˜œȬ˜—•’Œȱ˜•’’ŒŠ•ȱ›Š—œ’’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ˜•’’ŒŠ•ȱ
Š—œŒŠ™Žȱ
U.S. policy has been to extend the authority and encourage reform of Afghanistan’s President
Hamid Karzai and his central government, predicated on the observation that weak and corrupt
governance is causing some Afghans to acquiesce to Taliban insurgents as providers of stability
and credible justice. Karzai’s is the first fully elected government in Afghan history, although
there were parliamentary elections during the reign of King Zahir Shah (the last were in 1969).
Presidential, parliamentary, and provincial elections, and adoption of a constitution were part of a
post-Taliban transition roadmap established by a United Nations-sponsored agreement of major
Afghan factions signed in Bonn, Germany on December 5, 2001, (“Bonn Agreement”),1 after the
Taliban had fallen. The political transition process is depicted in the table below. The United
States provides about 22,000 forces to a 51,000 troop NATO-led peacekeeping coalition there;
another 14,000 U.S. troops continue the original post-September 11 counter-terrorism mission in
Afghanistan.
Since its formation in late 2001, Karzai’s government has come to be progressively dominated by
ethnic Pashtuns, who are about 42% of the population and traditionally have governed
Afghanistan. However, the Intelligence Directorate continues to be headed by a non-Pashtun
(Amrollah Saleh, a Tajik), and, adhering to a tacit consensus, the other security ministries
(Defense, Interior) tend to have Pashtun leadership but with non-Pashtuns in key deputy or
subordinate positions. One prominent example is the defense ministry, in which the chief of staff
is a Tajik (Bismillah Khan), who reports to a Pashtun Defense Minister (Abd al Rahim Wardak).
Still, it is the National Assembly (parliament), particularly the 249 seat elected lower house
(Wolesi Jirga), that is the key institution for the ethnic minorities to exert influence. Many seats in
the lower house are held by personalities and factions prominent in Afghanistan’s recent wars.
The lower house is divided into (mainly Pashtun) pro-Karzai, (mainly minority) opposition
figures, and “independents” of varied ethnicities, not strictly organized according to
Afghanistan’s 90 registered political parties. Karzai has not formed his own party, but his core
support in the Wolesi Jirga consists of former members of the hardline conservative Pashtun-
based Hizb-e-Islam party; and supporters of Abd-i-Rab Rasul Sayyaf – a prominent Islamic
conservative mujahedin party leader. Another base of support for him is the delegation from
Qandahar (Karzai’s home province), including several Karzai clan members. One clan member in
the body is his cousin Jamil Karzai, and relative by marriage Aref Nurzai. Karzai’s elder brother,
Qayyum, was in the lower house representing Qandahar until his October 2008 resignation due to
health reasons. Also pro-Karzai are former Pashtun militia and Taliban leaders, including Hazrat
Ali (Nangarhar Province), who had gained fame for leading the Afghan component of the failed
assault on Osama bin Laden’s purported redoubt at Tora Bora in December 2001; Pacha Khan
Zadran (Paktia) who, by some accounts, helped Osama bin Laden escape Tora Bora; and Mullah
Abdul Salam (“Mullah Rocketi”), from Zabol.
The “opposition,” led by ethnic minorities (Tajik, Uzbek, and Hazara) of the anti-Taliban
“Northern Alliance,” view as a betrayal Karzai’s firing of many of the non-Pashtuns from the

1 For text, see http://www.un.org/News/dh/latest/afghan/afghan-agree.htm.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŗȱ

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ
cabinet – such as former Foreign Minister Dr. Abdullah Abdullah, dismissed in 2006). However,
the bloc says its disputes with Karzai will remain political and peaceful. In April 2007, Wolesi
Jirga
Speaker Yunus Qanooni and former Afghan president Burhanuddin Rabbani, both
prominent Northern Alliance figures, organized a broader opposition bloc called the “United
Front” (UF), which includes both of Karzai’s vice presidents, and some Pashtuns prominent in the
Soviet-occupation era such as Sayed Muhammad Gulabzoi (Khost Province) and Nur ul-Haq
Ulumi, who chairs parliament’s defense committee. The UF advocates amending the constitution
to give more power to parliament and to empower the elected provincial councils (instead of the
President) to select governors and mayors. Fearing Pashtun consolidation, the UF has been
generally opposed to Karzai’s overtures to Taliban fighters to end their fight and join government
– an initiative that has begun to draw backing from the U.S. and British governments.
The opposition first showed its strength in March 2006, following the December 19, 2005
inauguration of parliament, by requiring Karzai’s cabinet to be approved individually, rather than
en bloc, increasing opposition leverage. However, Karzai rallied his support and all but 5 of the
25 nominees were confirmed. One of those defeated was a female nominee for Minister of
Women’s Affairs, leaving Afghanistan without any women ministers. The post was held by a
female since it was established in 2002. In May 2006, the opposition compelled Karzai to change
the nine-member Supreme Court, the highest judicial body, including ousting 74-year-old Islamic
conservative Fazl Hadi Shinwari as chief justice. Parliament approved his new Court choices in
July 2006, all of whom are trained in modern jurisprudence.
In May 2007, the UF achieved a majority in parliament to oust Karzai ally Rangin Spanta as
Foreign Minister. However, Karzai refused to replace him, instead seeking a Supreme Court
ruling that Spanta should remain, on the grounds that his ouster was related to a refugee issue
(Iran’s expulsion of 100,000 Afghan refugees), not a foreign policy issue. The Court has, to date,
supported Karzai, and Spanta remains Foreign Minister.
Karzai and the UF often battle for the support of the many “independents” in the lower house.
Among them are several outspoken women, intellectuals, and business leaders, such as 37 year-
old Malalai Joya (Farah Province), a leading critic of war-era faction leaders. In May 2007 the
lower house voted to suspend her for this criticism for the duration of her term, but she continues
to legally challenge the expulsion. Others in this camp include Ms. Fauzia Gailani (Herat
Province); Ms. Shukria Barekzai, editor of Woman Mirror magazine; and Mr. Ramazan
Bashardost, a former Karzai minister who champions parliamentary powers. U.S.-based
International Republican Institute (IRI) has helped train the independents; the National
Democratic Institute (NDI) has assisted the more established factions.
Karzai has fewer critics in the Meshrano Jirga, partly because of his 34 appointments (one-third
of that body). He engineered the appointment as Speaker an ally, Sibghatullah Mojadeddi, a noted
Islamic scholar who headed the post-Communist mujahedin government for one month (May
1992) and who now heads the effort to reconcile with Taliban figures (Peace and Reconciliation
Commission, or “PTSD” program). Karzai also appointed Northern Alliance military leader
Muhammad Fahim, perhaps to compensate for his removal as Defense Minister, although he
resigned after a few months and later joined the National Front. There is one Hindu, and 23
women; 17 are Karzai appointees and 6 were selected in their own right. This body tends to be
more Islamist conservative than the lower house, advocating a legal system that accords with
Islamic law, and restrictions on press and Westernized media broadcasts. In late 2008, the body
approved a law opposing a U.S.-Afghan plan to establish tribal militias to help keep Taliban
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
Řȱ

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ
infiltrators out of Afghan communities. The plan is being reworked and tested (“Community
Guard Program”) in some provinces as of early 2009 (see below).
On less contentious issues, the executive and the legislature have worked well. During 2008,
parliament passed a labor law, a mines law, a law on economic cooperatives, and a convention on
tobacco control. It also confirmed several Karzai nominees, including the final justice to fill out
the Supreme Court. Both houses of parliament, whose budgets are controlled by the Ministry of
Finance, are staffed by about 275 Afghans, reporting to a “secretariat.” There are 18 oversight
committees, a research unit and a library.
˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽŘȱ
U.S. policy has been to help expand Afghan institutions and to urge reforms such as merit-based
performance criteria and weeding out of the rampant official corruption. Afghan ministries are
growing their staffs and technologically capabilities, although still suffering from a low resource
and skill base. U.S. officials have generally refrained from publicly criticizing Karzai when, in
the interests of political harmony, he has indulged faction leaders with appointments and tolerated
corruption. However, President-elect Obama has been somewhat more publicly critical of
Karzai’s shortcomings than has the Bush Administration. Karzai argues that compromises with
faction leaders and tribes are needed to keep the government intact as he focuses on fighting
“unrepentant” Taliban insurgents. Partly as a result of these compromises, as well as what many
Afghans view as a “predatory” central government, some Afghans are said to be losing faith in
the government and in Karzai’s leadership, to the point where his re-election appears increasingly
uncertain. Karzai’s popularity also is being undermined by civilian casualties resulting from
U.S./NATO operations. Following an August 21, 2008, airstrike that some Afghans said killed 90
civilians (the incident is in dispute) near Herat city, the Afghan cabinet called for bringing foreign
forces under Afghan law, replacing an 2001 interim “status of forces agreement” with the
coalition. Afghanistan and the United States conducted a joint investigation of the incident.
’Œ’Š•ȱ˜››ž™’˜—ȱŠ—ȱ˜–™›˜–’œŽœȱ’‘ȱŠŒ’˜—ȱŽŠŽ›œȱ
The issue of official corruption has become a key U.S. agenda item as Karzai’s leadership image
fades. Some observers, such as former Coordinator for Counter-Narcotics and Justice Reform
Thomas Schweich, in a July 27, 2008 New York Times article, have gone so far as to assert that
Karzai, to build political support, is deliberately tolerating officials in his government who are
allegedly involved in the narcotics trade. The New York Times reported allegations (October 5,
2008) that another Karzai brother, Qandahar provincial council chief Ahmad Wali Karzai, is
involved in narcotics trafficking. The perception of governmental corruption was not improved by
Karzai’s decisions in 2007 to empower two Supreme Court chief justice Abdul Salam Azimi and
Attorney General Abdul Jabbar Sabit to instill confidence in the justice sector and enhance
accountability. Nor was confidence improved when Karzai fired Sabit on July 16, 2008, after
Sabit declared his intention to run against Karzai in 2009. Several high officials, despite very low
official government salaries, have acquired ornate properties in west Kabul since 2002, and it

2 Some information in this section is from the State Department reports on human rights in Afghanistan for 2007.
March 11, 2008 http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2007/100611.htm; the International Religious Freedom Report,
released September 19, 2008. http://www.state.gov/g/drl/irf/2007/90225.htm; and Defense Department “Report on
Progress Toward Security and Stability in Afghanistan.” June 2008
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
řȱ

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ
apparently is a widespread view in Afghanistan that obtaining government services or assistance
routinely requires sometimes onerous bribes.3 Transparency International, a German organization
that assesses governmental corruption worldwide, ranked Afghanistan in 2008 as 176th out of 180
countries ranked in terms of government corruption.
To try to address the criticism, in August 2008 Karzai, with reported U.S. prodding, set up the
“High Office of Oversight for the Implementation of Anti-Corruption Strategy” with the power to
investigate the police, courts, and the attorney general’s office, and to catalogue the overseas
assets of Afghan officials. Karzai said publicly in December 2008 that he believes that many high
officials have bank accounts overseas, such as in Dubai. In October 2008, Karzai replaced the
ministers of Interior, of Education, and of Agriculture with officials, particularly the new Interior
Minister – former Soviet-era official Muhammad Hanif Atmar – believed to be dedicated to
reform of their ministries and weeding out of official corruption. However, Atmar’s appointment
incurred further UF concern because Atmar, a Pashtun, replaced a Tajik (Zarrar Moqbel) in that
post. In December 2008, the lower house voted Commerce Minister Amin Farhang out of office
(nearly unanimous vote) for failing to bring down energy prices.
Karzai has marginalized several major regional strongmen but has been hesitant to confront them
to the point where their followers go into armed rebellion. In 2008, some observers cited Karzai’s
handling of prominent Uzbek leader Abdurrashid Dostam as evidence of political weakness.
Dostam is often referred to as a “warlord” because of his command of partisans in his redoubt in
northern Afghanistan (Jowzjan and Balkh provinces), and he is widely accused of human rights
abuses of political opponents in the north. To try to separate him from his militia, in 2005 Karzai
appointed him to the post of chief of staff of the armed forces. On February 4, 2008, Afghan
police surrounded Dostam’s villa in Kabul in response to reports that his followers attacked and
beat an ethnic Turkmen rival, but Karzai did not order his arrest for fear of stirring unrest among
Dostam’s followers. To try to resolve the issue without stirring unrest, in early December 2008
Karzai purportedly reached an agreement with Dostam under which he resigned as chief of staff
and went into exile in Turkey in exchange for the dropping any case against him.4 Karzai has
curbed prominent Tajik political leader, former Herat governor Ismail Khan, by appointing him
Minister of Energy and Water. In February 2007, both houses passed a law giving amnesty to so-
called “warlords”; Karzai altered the draft to give victims the right to seek justice for any abuses;
Karzai did not sign a modified version in May 2007, leaving the status unclear.
—Œ›ŽŠœ’—ȱ˜Œžœȱ˜—ȱ˜ŒŠ•ȱ˜•ž’˜—œȱŠ—ȱ ˜ŸŽ›—Š—ŒŽȱ
U.S. and Afghan government policy is in the process of shifting toward a reduced focus on
empowering the central government and promoting local security and governance solutions. A
key indicator of this shift came in August 2007 when Karzai placed the selection process for local
leaders (provincial governors and down) in a new Independent Directorate for Local Governance
(IDLG)—and out of the Interior Ministry. The IDLG, with advice from India and other donors,
has also developed plans to empower localities to decide on development priorities. In March
2008 Karzai replaced the weak and ineffective governor of Helmand - Asadullah Wafa - with
Gulab Mangal, who is from Laghman Province and who the U.N. Office of Drugs and Crime said
in an August 2008 report is taking relatively effective action to convince farmers not to grow

3 Filkins, Dexter. “Bribes Corrode Afghan’s Trust in Government.” New York Times, January 2, 2009.
4 CRS e-mail conversation with National Security aide to President Karzai. December 2008.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
Śȱ

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ
crops other than poppy. Some observers say that the central government has not given Mangal the
support he is requesting, such as delivery of seeds and other goods to encourage Helmand farmers
to grow legitimate crops, and there are reports Karzai wants to replace him with the former
governor, Sher Mohammad Akhundzadeh, who is accused of human rights abuses when he was
governor during 2002-2005 but who remains powerful in the province. The UNODC report said
that improving governance in some provinces had contributed to the increase to 18 “poppy free”
provinces (out of 34), from 13 in the same report in 2007. The governor of Qandahar was
changed (to former General Rahmatullah Raufi, replacing Asadullah Khalid) after the August 7,
2008 Taliban assault on the Qandahar prison that led to the freeing of several hundred Taliban
fighters incarcerated there. Karzai changed that governorship again in December 2008, naming
Canadian-Afghan academic Tooryalai Wesa as governor, perhaps hoping that his ties to Canada
would assuage Canadian reticence to continuing its mission in Qandahar beyond 2011. The IDLG
also has replaced the governor of Ghazni Province, and several other governors are slated to be
changed.
The IDLG is also the chief implementer of the recently-launched “Social Outreach Program”
which provides financial support (about $125 per month) and other benefits to tribal and local
leaders in exchange for their cooperation with U.S./NATO led forces against the Taliban
insurgency. The civilian aspects of the program are funded partly by USAID. A more
controversial security aspect of the program is called the “Community Guard program” – a partial
resurrection of the traditional tribal militias (“arbokai”) that provided local security before
Afghanistan’s recent wars. U.S. commanders say U.S. weapons will not be provided to the
militias – only training – but some weapons may come from the Afghan government. The security
components of the program are partially funded with DoD funds (“CERP” – Commanders
Emergency Response Program.). The program has been launched in Wardak province and will
also be implemented in Kapisa, Ghazni, and Lowgar in early 2009 Some see the shift toward new
local militias as a reversal of the 2001-2007 programs to disarm militias nationwide, although
U.S. commanders say they will be able to control the new militias.
ŸŽ›Š••ȱ ž–Š—ȱ’‘œȱ œœžŽœȱ
On human rights issues, the overall State Department judgment is that the country’s human rights
record remains poor, but primarily because of the weakness of the central government. The
security forces are widely cited for abuses and corruption, including torture and abuse of
detainees. In debate over a press law, both houses of parliament approved a joint version, but
Karzai has vetoed it on the grounds that it gives the government too much control over private
media. In the absence of a new law, Afghanistan’s conservative Council of Ulema (Islamic
scholars) has been ascendant. With the Council’s backing, in April 2008 the Ministry of
Information and Culture banned five Indian-produced soap operas on the grounds that they are
too risque, although the programs were restored in August 2008 under a compromise that also
brought in some Islamic-oriented programs from Turkey. At the same time, press reports say that
there are growing numbers of arrests or intimidation of journalists who criticize the central
government or local leaders. On the other hand, many women are now in parliament (numbers in
the table below), and there is one female governor (Bamiyan Province), 67 female judges, and
almost 500 female journalists working nationwide.
The September 2008 International Religious Freedom report says the Afghan government took
limited steps during the year to increase religious freedom. Still, members of minority religions,
including Christians, Sikhs, Hindus, and Baha’i’s, often face discrimination; the Supreme Court
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
śȱ

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ
declared the Baha’i faith to be a form of blasphemy in May 2007. In October 2007, Afghanistan
resumed enforcing the death penalty after a four-year moratorium, executing 15 criminals. One
major case incurring international criticism has been the January 2008 death sentence, imposed in
a quick trial, against 23 year old journalist Sayed Kambaksh for allegedly distributing material
critical of Islam. On October 21, 2008, a Kabul appeals court changed his sentence to 20 years in
prison; he remains in jail but has several avenues of appeal remaining. Afghanistan was again
placed in Tier 2 in the State Department’s June 4, 2008, Trafficking in Persons report for 2008 on
the grounds that it does not fully comply with minimum standards for the elimination of
trafficking in persons. However, the report says it is making significant efforts to do so, including
by establishing anti-trafficking offices in the offices of the Attorney General in all 34 provinces.
One positive development is that Afghanistan’s Shiite minority, mostly from the Hazara tribes of
central Afghanistan (Bamiyan and Dai Kundi provinces) can celebrate their holidays openly – a
development unknown before the fall of the Taliban. Some Afghan Shiites follow Iran’s clerical
leaders politically, but Afghan Shiites tend to be less religious and more socially open than their
co-religionists in Iran. The Minister of Justice is a Shiite.
ž—’—ȱ œœžŽœȱ
USAID has spent about $440 million (FY2002-2007) to build democracy and rule of law, and
assist the elections. A revised request for FY2008 supplemental funding included $100 million to
assist with the presidential elections planned for 2009. For FY2009, $707 million in Economic
Support Funds (ESF) was requested which will be used in part to enable the Karzai government
to “extend the reach of good governance....” Some of the aid for FY2009 is being extended to the
IDLG for its operations and to support the Social Outreach Program discussed above. In FY 2009,
according to a September 25, 2008 State Department fact sheet, USAID is providing $8.5 million
to support the IDLG and to fund the Social Outreach Program and a separate “Governor’s
Performance Fund” intended to promote good governance. Another $95 million will go to the
IDLG to help it construct new district centers and rehabilitate fifty provincial and district offices.
For comprehensive tables on U.S. aid to Afghanistan, by fiscal year and by category and type of
aid, see CRS Report RL30588. Afghanistan: Post-War Governance and Security, by Kenneth
Katzman.
ŘŖŖşȱ•ŽŒ’˜—œȱ
The next major political milestone in Afghanistan is the 2009 presidential and provincial
elections. No firm date is yet set, but a consensus, backed by Afghanistan’s Independent Election
Commission (IEC) that will run the elections, seems to be forming around a late summer time
frame. The UF, sensing vulnerability for Karzai, had wanted the elections in May 2009 in
accordance with a strict interpretation of the constitution. Security conditions could still derail the
elections, in which case a loya jirga would convene to select a president. However, enthusiasm
among the public appears to be high, and pre-election maneuvering is advancing, according to
observers. Registration (updating of 2005 voter rolls) began in October 2008 and is expected to
be completed by February 2009. However, there are also reports of some registration fraud, with
some voters registering on behalf of women who do not, by custom, show up at registration sites.
U.S./NATO military operations in some areas, including in Helmand in January 2009, were
conducted to secure registration centers. Still, registration percentages in restive areas are lower
than in more secure areas.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
Ŝȱ

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ
In the election-related political jockeying,5 Karzai said in August 2008 that he is seeking re-
election; the two-round election virtually assures victory by a Pashtun. Anti-Karzai Pashtuns at
first attempted, unsuccessfully, to coalesce around one challenger, possibly former Interior
Minister Ali Jalali (who resigned in 2005 over Karzai’s compromises with faction leaders), or
former Finance Minister and Karzai critic Ashraf Ghani. In December 2008, Ghani, a member of
the prominent Ahmedzai clan, returned to Afghanistan to a welcoming ceremony in which he was
“nominated” for president by “32 political parties,” according to Afghan media. Some observers
say that there is discussion of an agreement under which Jalali, a Pashtun, might head a UF ticket,
a move that would be intended to win votes from both Pashtuns and minorities. Under this
scenario, former Foreign Minister Dr. Abdullah (a Tajik) might run as a vice presidential
candidate on the UF ticket, and neither he nor former President Burhanuddin Rabbani (a Tajik,
and president during 1992-1996), would head the UF slate. Others say Rabbani, as the elder
statesman of the UF bloc, is insisting on heading the ticket himself. Other potential contenders
include Hazara leader Mohammad Mohaqqeq; Ramazan Bashardost (another Hazara); Sabit
(Pashtun, mentioned above); and Pashtun monarchist figures Pir Gaylani and Hedayat Arsala
Amin. Rumors have recently abated that U.S. Ambassador to U.N., Afghan-born Zalmay
Khalilzad, might himself run.

5 Some of the information in this paragraph obtained in CRS interviews with a Karzai national security aide. December
2008.
˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
ŝȱ

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ

Table 1. Afghanistan Political Transition Process
Interim
Formed by Bonn Agreement. Headed by Hamid Karzai, an ethnic Pashtun, but key security
Administration positions dominated by mostly minority “Northern Alliance.” Karzai reaffirmed as leader by June
2002 “emergency loya jirga.” (A jirga is a traditional Afghan assembly).
Constitution
Approved by January 2004 “Constitutional Loya Jirga” (CLJ). Set up strong presidency, a rebuke to
Northern Alliance that wanted prime ministership to balance presidential power, but gave
parliament significant powers to compensate. Gives men and women equal rights under the law,
allows for political parties as long as they are not “un-Islamic”; allows for court rulings according
to Hanafi (Sunni) Islam (Chapter 7, Article 15). Set out electoral roadmap for simultaneous (if
possible) presidential, provincial, and district elections by June 2004. Named ex-King Zahir Shah to
non-hereditary position of “Father of the Nation;” he died July 23, 2007.
Presidential
Elections for President and two vice presidents, for five year term, held October 9, 2004. Turnout
Election
was 80% of 10.5 million registered. Karzai and running mates (Ahmad Zia Masud, a Tajik and
brother of legendary mujahedin commander Ahmad Shah Masud, who was assassinated by Al
Qaeda two days before the September 11 attacks, and Karim Khalili, a Hazara) elected with 55%
against 16 opponents. Second highest vote getter, Northern Alliance figure (and Education
Minister) Yunus Qanooni (16%). One female ran, got about 1%. Hazara leader Mohammad
Mohaqiq got 11.7%; and Dostam won 10%. Funded with $90 million in international aid, including
$40 million from U.S. (FY2004 supplemental, P.L. 108-106).
Parliamentary
Elections held September 18, 2005 on Single Non-Transferable Vote” System; candidates stood as
Elections
individuals, not part of party list. Parliament consists of a 249 elected lower house (Wolesi Jirga,
House of the People) and a selected 102 seat upper house (Meshrano Jirga, House of Elder).
Voting was for one candidate only, although number of representatives varied by province, ranging
from 2 (Panjshir Province) to 33 (Kabul Province). Herat has 17; Nangahar, 14; Qandahar, Balkh,
and Ghazni, 11 seats each. The body is 28% female (68 persons), in line with the legal minimum of
68 women - two per each of the 34 provinces. Upper house appointed by Karzai (34 seats, half of
which are to be women), by the provincial councils (34 seats), and district councils (remaining 34
seats). There are 23 women in it, above the 17 required by the constitution. Because district
elections (400 district councils) were not held, provincial councils selected 68 on interim basis.
2,815 candidates for Wolesi Jirga, including 347 women. Turnout was 57% (6.8 million voters) of
12.5 million registered. Funded by $160 million in international aid, including $45 million from U.S.
(FY2005 supplemental appropriation, P.L. 109-13).
Provincial
Provincial elections held September 18, 2005, simultaneous with parliamentary elections. Exact
Elections/
powers vague, but now taking lead in deciding local reconstruction Provincial councils size range
District
from 9 to the 29 seats on the Kabul provincial council. Total seats are 420, of which 121 held by
Elections
women. l3,185 candidates, including 279 women. Some criticize the provincial election system as
disproportionately weighted toward large districts within each province. District elections not
held due to complexity and potential tensions of drawing district boundaries.
Cabinet
Full-term 27 seat cabinet named by Karzai in December 2004. Heavily weighted toward Pashtuns,
and created new Ministry of Counter-Narcotics. Rahim Wardak named Defense Minister,
replacing Northern Alliance military leader Mohammad Fahim. Qanooni not in cabinet,
subsequently was selected Wolesi Jirga Speaker. Northern Alliance figure Dr. Abdullah replaced as
Foreign Minister in March 2006. Cabinet reshuffle in October 2008 including appointment of
Atmar as Interior Minister.
Next Elections Presidential and provincial elections to be held in fall 2009; parliamentary, district, and municipal
elections in 2010. Each election to cost $100 million. Elections also to be held for 23,000
“Community Development Councils” (CDC’s) nationwide that decide development priorities.


˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
Şȱ

‘Š—’œŠ—DZȱ ˜ŸŽ›—–Ž—ȱ˜›–Š’˜—ȱŠ—ȱŽ›˜›–Š—ŒŽȱ
ȱ
ž‘˜›ȱ˜—ŠŒȱ —˜›–Š’˜—ȱ

Kenneth Katzman

Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs
kkatzman@crs.loc.gov, 7-7612




˜—›Žœœ’˜—Š•ȱŽœŽŠ›Œ‘ȱŽ›Ÿ’ŒŽȱ
şȱ