Order Code RL34109
Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal
Civil Remedies and Criminal Penalties Related to
Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents
Updated October 31, 2008
Brian T. Yeh
Legislative Attorney
American Law Division

---

Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil
Remedies and Criminal Penalties Related to
Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents
Summary
This report provides information describing the federal civil remedies and
criminal penalties that may be available as a consequence of violations of the federal
intellectual property laws: the Copyright Act of 1976, the Patent Act of 1952, and
the Trademark Act of 1946 (conventionally known as the Lanham Act). The report
explains the remedies and penalties for the following intellectual property offenses:
! 17 U.S.C. § 501 (copyright infringement);
! 17 U.S.C. § 506(a)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319(b) (criminal
copyright infringement for profit);
! 17 U.S.C. § 506(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319(c) (criminal copyright
infringement without a profit motive);
! 17 U.S.C. § 506(a)(1)(c) and 18 U.S.C. § 2319(d) (pre-release
distribution of a copyrighted work over a computer network);
! 17 U.S.C. § 1309 (infringement of a vessel hull or deck design);
! 17 U.S.C. § 1326 (falsely marking an unprotected vessel hull or deck
design with a protected design notice);
! 17 U.S.C. §§ 1203, 1204 (circumvention of copyright protection);
! 18 U.S.C. § 2319A (bootleg recordings of live musical
performances);
! 18 U.S.C. § 2319B (unauthorized recording of motion pictures in
movie theaters);
! 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1) (unauthorized use in commerce of a
reproduction, counterfeit, or colorable imitation of a federally
registered trademark);
! 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (trademark infringement due to false
designation, origin, or sponsorship);
! 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c) (dilution of famous trademarks);
! 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(d) and 1129 (cybersquatting and cyberpiracy in
connection with Internet domain names);
! 18 U.S.C. § 2318 (counterfeit/illicit labels and counterfeit
documentation and packaging for copyrighted works);
! 35 U.S.C. § 271 (patent infringement);
! 35 U.S.C. § 289 (infringement of a design patent);
! 35 U.S.C. § 292 (false marking of patent-related information in
connection with articles sold to the public);
! 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (unauthorized use of a patented invention by or for
the United States, or copyright infringement by the United States);
! 19 U.S.C. § 1337 (unfair practices in import trade);
! 18 U.S.C. § 2320 (trafficking in counterfeit trademarks);
! 19 U.S.C. § 1526(e), 15 U.S.C. § 1124 (importing merchandise
bearing counterfeit marks),18 U.S.C. § 2320(h) (transshipment and
exportation of counterfeit goods);
! 18 U.S.C. § 1831 (trade secret theft to benefit a foreign entity); and
! 18 U.S.C. § 1832 (theft of trade secrets for commercial advantage).

---

Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Civil Remedies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Copyright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Trademark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Patent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Unfair Competition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Trade Secrets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Criminal Penalties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Copyright . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Trademark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Trade Secrets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

---

Intellectual Property Rights Violations:
Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal
Penalties Related to Copyrights,
Trademarks, and Patents
This report summarizes the federal civil remedies and criminal penalties that
may be available for violations of the rights granted by the federal intellectual
property laws: the Copyright Act of 1976, the Patent Act of 1952, and the Trademark
Act of 1946 (conventionally known as the Lanham Act).1
Introduction

Intellectual property (IP) law has three major branches, applicable to different
types of subject matter: copyright (original artistic and literary works of authorship),
patent (inventions of processes, machines, manufactures, and compositions of matter
that are useful, new, and nonobvious), and trademark (commercial symbols). The
source of federal copyright and patent law originates with the Copyright and Patent
Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which authorizes Congress “To promote the
Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and
Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.”2 By
contrast, the constitutional basis for federal trademark law is the Commerce Clause.3
The Copyright Act, Patent Act, and Lanham Act provide legal protection for
intellectual property against unauthorized use, theft, and other violations of the rights
granted by those statutes to the IP owner. The Copyright Act provides copyright
owners with the exclusive right to control reproduction, distribution, public
1 Unlike copyright and patent law, trademark rights and remedies for trademark infringement
may arise from both federal and state law. Although this report focuses exclusively on
federal trademark law, state common law may provide another source of legal protection for
trademark owners.
2 U.S. CONST. art. I, § 8, cl. 8.
3 U.S. CONST. art. I, § 8, cl. 3. In the Trade-Mark Cases, 100 U.S. 82, 93-94 (1879), the U.S.
Supreme Court held the first federal trademark act to be unconstitutional because it was
enacted pursuant to the Copyright and Patent clause: “Any attempt ... to identify the
essential characteristics of a trade-mark with inventions and discoveries in the arts and
sciences, or with the writings of authors, will show that the effort is surrounded with
insurmountable difficulties.” Subsequent federal trademark laws avoided this problem
because they were adopted pursuant to Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce,
foreign commerce, and commerce with the Indian Tribes.

---

CRS-2
performance, and display of their copyrighted works.4 The Patent Act grants patent
holders the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling
their patented invention throughout the United States, or importing the invention into
the United States.5 The Lanham Act allows sellers and producers of goods and
services to prevent a competitor from:
(1) using any counterfeit, copy, or imitation of their trademarks (that have been
registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office), in connection with the
sale of any goods or services in a way that is likely to cause confusion, mistake,
or deception,6 or
(2) using in commercial advertising any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or
any false or misleading designation of origin or false or misleading description
or representation of fact, which: (a) is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or
deception as to affiliation, connection, or association, or as to origin,
sponsorship, or approval, of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities
by another person, or (b) misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or
geographic origin of his or her or another person’s goods, services, or
commercial activities.7
In addition, the Lanham Act grants to owners of “famous” trademarks the right to
seek injunctive relief against another person’s use in commerce of a mark or trade
name if such use causes dilution by blurring or tarnishment of the distinctive quality
of the famous trademark.8
An alternative to patent law protection may be found in trade secret law, which
protects trade secrets9 from theft and espionage.10 The federal Economic Espionage
4 17 U.S.C. § 106.
5 35 U.S.C. §§ 154(a)(1), 271(a). However, there is no statutory requirement that a patentee
must practice the invention; the patentee is free to license to others the right to make, use,
or sell the invention. Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., Inc., 56 F.3d 1538, 1547 (Fed. Cir.
1995). Nor does the grant of a patent give a patent holder an affirmative right to use the
invention, as compliance with other laws may be required before such activity. For
example, if a company obtains a patent on a drug compound, it must still seek the approval
of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in order to market the drug to consumers.
6 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1).
7 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1).
8 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(1). For more information about trademark dilution, see CRS Report
RL33393, Protecting Famous, Distinctive Marks: The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of
2006, by Brian T. Yeh.
9 A “trade secret” means all forms and types of financial, business, scientific, technical,
economic, or engineering information, including patterns, plans, compilations, program
devices, formulas, designs, prototypes, methods, techniques, processes, procedures,
programs, or codes, whether tangible or intangible, and whether or how stored, compiled,
or memorialized physically, electronically, graphically, photographically, or in writing if:
(A) the owner thereof has taken reasonable measures to keep such information secret; and
(B) the information derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being
generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable through proper means by, the public.
(continued...)

---

CRS-3
Act of 199611 provides criminal penalties for the theft or misappropriation12 of trade
secrets in certain circumstances, by domestic and foreign entities.
Enforcement of IP rights may be accomplished by the IP owner bringing a
lawsuit against an alleged infringer. The U.S. Department of Justice may also
criminally prosecute particularly egregious violators of the IP laws in order to impose
greater punishment and possibly deter other would-be violators.13 In certain
circumstances, a variety of federal agencies may become involved in IP rights
enforcement:14 for example, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency has the
power to seize counterfeit goods upon their attempted importation in the United
States; the International Trade Commission may investigate and adjudicate
allegations of unfair trade practices due to the importing of goods that infringe U.S.
patents, trademarks, or copyrights; and the U.S. Trade Representative, the U.S.
Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration, and the U.S. State
Department are all involved in promoting and seeking IP rights enforcement by
trading partners and other foreign countries.15
9 (...continued)
18 U.S.C. § 1839(3).
10 Until 1996, trade secret protection was primarily governed by state law. The Uniform
Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) was published in 1979 by the National Conference of
Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and codifies the common law concerning trade
secrets. The UTSA has been adopted by 40 states and the District of Columbia. For a list
of the states that have adopted the UTSA, see [http://www.nccusl.org/nccusl/uniformact_
factsheets/uniformacts-fs-utsa.asp].
11 P.L. 104-294, §§ 1831-1839, 110 Stat. 3488 (codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1831-1839).
12 “Misappropriation” of a trade secret means an acquisition, disclosure, or use of a trade
secret by “improper means.” UNIFORM TRADE SECRETS ACT § 1(2). “Improper means” is
a term that “includes theft, bribery, misrepresentation, breach or inducement of a breach of
a duty to maintain secrecy, or espionage through electronic or other means.” Id. § 1(1).
13 The 94 U.S. Attorneys’ Offices located across the country have primary responsibility for
prosecution of IP offenses. Every office has a Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property
(“CHIP”) Coordinator, who are Assistant U.S. Attorneys with expertise in prosecuting IP
and computer crimes. U.S. DEP’T OF JUSTICE, COMPUTER CRIME & INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY SECTION, PROSECUTING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CRIMES (3rd ed., Sept. 2006),
available at [http://www.usdoj.gov/criminal/cybercrime/ipmanual/01ipma.html].
14 The scope of this report is limited to summarizing the penalties available under federal
law for IP rights violations; the report will not discuss in detail the various foreign, federal
and state entities that may become involved in IP enforcement and prosecution activities.
15 The “Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008,” P.L.
110-403, created the position of “Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator” (IPEC)
to serve within the Executive Office of the President, and established an interagency IP
enforcement advisory committee, chaired by the IPEC and composed of Senate-confirmed
representatives of departments and agencies involved in IP enforcement, including the
Office of Management and Budget, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Food and Drug
Administration, Copyright Office, and the Departments of State, Homeland Security,
Agriculture, and Justice. This advisory committee is charged with developing and
implementing a “joint strategic plan” to combat counterfeiting and infringement of IP rights.

---

CRS-4
In copyright cases, the statute of limitations for initiating a civil action is within
three years after the claim accrued, while a criminal proceeding must be commenced
within five years after the cause of action arose.16 Although there is no express
federal statute of limitations for civil trademark infringement claims, federal courts
generally follow the limitations period for the most analogous state-law cause of
action from the state in which the claim is heard; courts have also applied the
equitable doctrine of laches to determine whether a trademark infringement claim is
untimely.17 One federal appellate court has determined that criminal trademark
infringement prosecutions are governed by the general five-year statute of limitations
for non-capital offenses under Title 18 of the U.S. Code.18 Although there is no
statute of limitations in patent infringement actions, the Patent Act specifies a time
limit on monetary relief for patent infringement claims: damages are available only
for infringement that occurs within the six years prior to the filing of the complaint
or counterclaim for patent infringement.19
Both the Lanham Act and the Copyright Act have criminal and civil provisions
for violations of their respective provisions,20 while the Patent Act only provides civil
remedies in the event of patent infringement.21 Federal courts determine the civil
remedies in an action for infringement brought by the IP owner.22 If the federal
government chooses to prosecute individuals or organizations for IP violations, the
imprisonment terms are set forth in the substantive statutes describing the particular
IP crime, while the criminal fine amount is determined in conjunction with 18 U.S.C.
§ 3571 (specifies the amount of the fine under Title 18 of the U.S. Code).
Information regarding the civil remedies and criminal penalties for violations
of the copyright, trademark, and patent laws is presented on the following pages in
table-format. These penalties may be imposed upon conviction of the defendant in
the case of a criminal prosecution, and the civil remedies follow a judgment of
16 17 U.S.C. § 507.
17 Ronald J. Nessim, Criminal (and Civil) Trademark Infringement: What Statute of
Limitations Applies?, 76 J. PAT. & TRADEMARK OFF. SOC’Y 933, 937 (Dec. 1994).
18 18 U.S.C. § 3282; see also United States v. Foote, 413 F.3d 1240, 1247 (10th Cir.
2005)(“In the case of the Counterfeit Trademark Act, a criminal statute, Congress has
provided a specific statutory period in § 3282.”).
19 35 U.S.C. § 286. However, the equitable doctrine of laches may be raised as an
affirmative defense to a claim for patent infringement if the patent holder’s delay in bringing
suit is unreasonable and inexcusable, and the alleged infringer suffers material prejudice
attributable to the delay. See A.C. Aukerman Co. v. R.L. Chaides Constr. Co., 960 F.2d
1020, 1028 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (“A presumption of laches arises where a patentee delays
bringing suit for more than six years after the date the patentee knew or should have known
of the alleged infringer’s activity.”).
20 For copyright, 17 U.S.C. § 501 (civil) and § 506, 18 U.S.C. § 2319 (criminal); for
trademark, 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (civil) and 18 U.S.C. § 2320 (criminal).
21 35 U.S.C. § 281.
22 For copyright infringement civil actions, see 17 U.S.C. §§ 501-505; trademark
infringement claims, see 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114-1121; patent infringement actions, see 35
U.S.C. §§ 281-297.

---

CRS-5
infringement reached by a federal judge or jury in a civil action. (Certain injunctive
relief may be available prior to final judgment, such as temporary injunctions or
impounding of infringing articles.) For any offense that provides forfeiture penalties,
criminal forfeiture is available upon the conviction of the owner of the offending
property; civil forfeiture is available if the government establishes that the infringing
goods are subject to confiscation by a preponderance of the evidence.23 Restitution
is available when the defendant is convicted of a criminal property offense.24
23 For more information about forfeiture generally, see CRS Report 97-139, Crime and
Forfeiture, by Charles Doyle.
24 18 U.S.C. § 2323(c) (“When a person is convicted of an offense under section 506 of title
17 or section 2318, 2319, 2319A, 2319B, or 2320, or chapter 90, of this title, the court,
pursuant to sections 3556, 3663A, and 3664 of this title, shall order the person to pay
restitution to any victim of the offense as an offense against property referred to in section
3663A(c)(1)(A)(ii) of this title”). This new section of the U.S. Code was added by the
“Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008,” P.L.
110-403.

---

CRS-6
Civil Remedies
Copyright
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Availablea
Copyright
Violation of any of the exclusive
(1) Injunctions, 17 U.S.C. § 502.
Infringement, 17
rights of the copyright owner as
(2) Impounding, destruction, or other reasonable disposition of: all copies made in violation of
U.S.C. § 501
provided by 17 U.S.C. §§ 106-
the copyright owner’s rights; all plates, molds, matrices, masters, tapes, film negatives, or other
122, 602, including the right to
articles by means of which such copies may be reproduced; and any records documenting the
control reproduction, distribution,
manufacture, sale, or receipt of things involved in the violation — the court shall take such
public performance, and display
records into custody and shall enter an appropriate protective order (with respect to discovery
of copyrighted works.
and use of the records) that assures that confidential information contained in such records is
not improperly disclosed or used, 17 U.S.C. § 503.
(3) Actual damages suffered by the copyright owner due to the infringement, and any profits of
the infringer attributable to the infringement, 17 U.S.C. § 504(b).
(4) Statutory damages (at the copyright owner’s election to recover in lieu of actual damages
and profits), in the amount of not less than $750 or more than $30,000 as the court deems just,
17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(1). For willful infringement, a court may, in its discretion, increase the
statutory damages award to a sum of not more than $150,000, 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(2).b
(5) Costs and attorney’s fees, 17 U.S.C. § 505.

---

CRS-7
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Availablea
Infringement of a
Violation of any of the rights of
(1) Injunctions, 17 U.S.C. § 1322.c
Vessel Hull or Deck
the owner of a vessel hull or deck
(2) Destruction or other disposition of all infringing articles, and any plates, molds, patterns,
Design, 17 U.S.C. §
design registered with the U.S.
models, or other means specially adapted for making the articles, 17 U.S.C. § 1323(e).
1309
Copyright Office, including the
(3) Actual damages suffered by the copyright owner due to the infringement, 17 U.S.C. §
right to: (1) make, have made, or
1323(a). The court may increase the damages to such amount, not exceeding $50,000 or $1 per
import, for sale or for use in
copy, whichever is greater, as the court determines to be just.
trade, any useful article
(4) Infringer’s profits (may only be awarded as an alternative to compensatory damages)
embodying the design; and (2)
resulting from the sale of the copies if the court finds that the infringer’s sales are reasonably
sell or distribute any useful
related to the use of the owner’s design, 17 U.S.C. § 1323(b).
article with the design.
(5) Attorney’s fees, 17 U.S.C. § 1323(d).
A seller/distributor who did not
make or import an infringing
article is liable if he induces or
acts in collusion to make/import
the article. A seller/distributor
can also be liable if a design
owner asks where the article
came from and the
seller/distributor refuses to
disclose its source and orders or
reorders the article with the
infringing design after being
notified that the design is
protected.

---

CRS-8
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Availablea
Falsely Marking an
For the purpose of deceiving the
(1) A fine of not more than $500 for each such offense, 17 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
Unprotected Vessel
public, marking or using in
(2) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing
Hull or Deck Design
advertising in connection with an
and the remainder awarded to the United States, 17 U.S.C. § 1326(b).
with a Protected
unprotected vessel hull or deck
Design Notice, 17
design (not registered with the
U.S.C. § 1326
U.S. Copyright Office) a design
notice or other words or symbols
suggesting that the design is
protected, knowing that the
design is not so protected.

---

CRS-9
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Availablea
Circumvention of
(1) 17 U.S.C. § 1201:
(1) Temporary and permanent injunctions to prevent or restrain a violation of this offense, but
Copyright Protection
Descrambling, decrypting, or
in no event shall the court impose a prior restraint on free speech or the press protected under
Systems in Violation
otherwise avoiding, bypassing,
the First Amendment to the Constitution.
of
removing, deactivating, or
(2) At any time while an action is pending, the court may order the impounding of any device or
§§ 1201 and 1202 of
impairing a technological
product that is in the custody or control of the alleged violator and that the court has reasonable
the Digital
measure, without the authority of
cause to believe was involved in a violation.
Millennium
the copyright owner, that
(3) Recovery of costs by or against any party other than the United States or an officer thereof.
Copyright Act
effectively controls access to a
(4) Reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party.
(DMCA), 17 U.S.C. §
copyrighted work.
(5) The court may order the remedial modification or the destruction of any device or product
1203
involved in the violation that is in the custody or control of the violator or that has been
(2) 17 U.S.C. § 1202:
impounded.
Manufacturing, importing,
(6) Actual damages and any additional profits of the violator that are attributable to the
offering to the public, providing,
violation and are not taken into account in computing the actual damages.
or otherwise trafficking in any
(7) Statutory damages (at the election of the complaining party in lieu of actual damages), as
technology, product, service,
follows:
device, or component, that is
! For each violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1201, in the sum of not less than $200 or
primarily designed or produced
more than $2,500 per act of circumvention, device, product, component, offer,
for the purpose of circumventing
or performance of service, as the court considers just.
copyright protection measures.
! For each violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1202, in the sum of not less than $2,500 or
more than $25,000.
(8) For repeated violations: If the injured party proves, and the court finds, that a person has
violated 17 U.S.C. §§ 1201 or 1202 within 3 years after a final judgment was entered against
the person for another such violation, the court may increase the award of damages up to triple
the amount that would otherwise be awarded, as the court considers just.
(9) For innocent violations: The court in its discretion may reduce or remit the total award of
damages in any case in which the violator proves, and the court finds, that the violator was not
aware and had no reason to believe that its acts constituted a violation.

---

CRS-10
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Availablea
Counterfeit or Illicit
Knowingly trafficking in a
(1) Injunctions, 18 U.S.C. § 2318(e)(2)(A).
Labels and
counterfeit label or illicit label
(2) Impounding of any article in the custody/control of the alleged violator that the court has
Counterfeit
affixed to, enclosing, or
reasonable cause to believe was involved in a violation of this offense, 18 U.S.C. §
Documentation and
accompanying a copyrighted
2318(e)(2)(B).
Packaging for
work, or trafficking in counterfeit
(3) Reasonable attorney fees and costs, 18 U.S.C. § 2318(e)(2)(C).
Copyrighted Works,
documentation or packaging.
(4) Actual damages and any additional profits of the violator, 18 U.S.C. § 2318(e)(2)(C)(ii)(I).
18 U.S.C. § 2318(e)(1)c
(5) Statutory damages (at the election of the plaintiff to recover instead of actual damages and
profits), in the amount of not less than $2,500 or more than $25,000, as the court considers
appropriate, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2318(e)(2)(C)(ii)(II), (f)(4).
(6) Treble damages for subsequent violations by an individual within 3 years after a final
judgment was entered against that person for a violation of this offense, 18 U.S.C. §2318(e)(5).
Infringement of a
Infringement of a copyrighted
The exclusive remedy is for the copyright owner to commence an action against the United
Copyrighted Work by
work by the United States
States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of his or her reasonable and
the United States,d 28
government, by a corporation
entire compensation as damages for such infringement, including the minimum statutory
U.S.C. § 1498(b)
owned or controlled by the
damages as set forth in 17 U.S.C. § 504(c). However, before the copyright owner may bring
United States government, or by
such an action, the appropriate corporation owned or controlled by the United States or the head
a contractor, subcontractor, or
of the appropriate department or agency of the Government, as the case may be, is authorized to
any person, firm, or corporation
enter into an agreement with the copyright owner for the damages caused by such infringement
acting for the United States and
and to settle the claim administratively out of available appropriations.
with the authorization or consent
of the United States government.
a. Throughout this report, the list of “remedies available” or “authorized penalties” describes the range of remedies and penalties that are associated with the particular violation; whether
some or all the remedies/penalties apply in any given case depends on several factors, including the court’s discretion, the plaintiff’s election of remedy, the defendant’s conduct,
and other factual circumstances of the case.
b. Where an infringer proves that he was not aware and had no reason to believe his acts constituted copyright infringement, the court may, in its discretion, reduce the award of
statutory damages to a sum of not less than $200, 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(2).
c. While this offense also carries criminal penalties, discussed infra, the statute also provides civil remedies, permitting any copyright owner who is injured, or is threatened with injury
due to this offense, to file suit in an appropriate U.S. district court.
d. Under the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, a state (or instrumentality thereof) enjoys governmental immunity from lawsuits brought by private parties. Therefore,
a state that violates intellectual property rights may not be sued by the intellectual property owner unless the state consents. Congress has attempted to abrogate the states’
sovereign immunity from patent, trademark, or copyright infringement lawsuits, by passing laws in the early 1990s that explicitly required states to submit to suit in federal court
for their intellectual property violations. However, federal courts have held these laws unconstitutional. See Florida Prepaid v. College Savings, 527 U.S. 627 (1999) (invalidating
the Patent and Plant Remedy Clarification Act of 1992); Chavez v. Arte Publico Press, 204 F.3d 601 (5th Cir. 2000) (invalidating the Copyright Remedy Clarification Act of
1990); Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wisconsin System v. Phoenix Software Int’l, Inc., 565 F.Supp.2d 1007 (W.D. Wis. 2008)(invalidating the Trademark Remedy
Clarification Act of 1992).

---

CRS-11
Trademark
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Available
Trademark
Unauthorized use in commerce of
(1) Injunctions, 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a).
Infringement Due to
any reproduction, copy, or colorable
(2) Any damages sustained by the plaintiff, defendant’s profits, and the costs of the action, 15
Unauthorized Use of
imitationa of a federally registered
U.S.C. § 1117(a).
Any Reproduction,
mark in connection with the sale,
(3) In exceptional cases,b reasonable attorney fees, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a).
Copy, or Colorable
offering for sale, distribution, or
(4) The court may order that any infringing articles bearing the reproduction, copy, or
Imitation of a
advertising of any goods or
colorable imitation of a registered mark be destroyed, 15 U.S.C. § 1118.
Federally Registered
services, where such use is likely to
Mark, 15 U.S.C.
cause consumer confusion, mistake,
§ 1114(1)
or deception.
Trademark
Intentional use in commerce of a
(1) Injunctions, 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a).
Infringement Due to
counterfeit mark or designationc, in
(2) The court may order that any infringing articles bearing the counterfeit of the registered
Use of a Counterfeit
either of two circumstances:
mark be destroyed, 15 U.S.C. § 1118.
of a Federally
(3) Seizure of goods and counterfeit marks as ordered by a court upon an ex parte
Registered Mark, 15
(1) in connection with the sale,
application, as well as the means of making such marks, and records documenting the
U.S.C.
offering for sale, or distribution of
manufacturer, sale, or receipt of things involved in such violation, 15 U.S.C. §
§ 1114(1)
goods or services, knowing that
1116(d)(1)(A).
such mark or designation is a
(4) Unless the court finds extenuating circumstances, treble any damages sustained by the
counterfeit mark, or
plaintiff or defendant’s profits, whichever is greater, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees, 15
U.S.C. § 1117(b).
(2) providing goods or services
(5) Statutory damages (at the election of the plaintiff to recover instead of actual damages
necessary to the commission of the
and profits), in the amount of not less than $1,000 or more than $200,000 per counterfeit
violation described in the first
mark per type of goods or services sold, offered for sale, or distributed, as the court considers
circumstance above, with the intent
just, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(1). If the court finds that the use of the counterfeit mark was
that the recipient of the goods or
willful, the statutory damages award is not more than $2,000,000 per counterfeit mark per
services would put the goods or
type of goods or services sold, offered for sale, or distributed, as the court considers just, 15
services to use in committing the
U.S.C. § 1117(c)(2).
violation.

---

CRS-12
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Available
Trademark
Use in connection with any goods or
(1) Injunctions, 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a).
Infringement Due to
services of any word, term, name,
(2) Any damages sustained by the plaintiff, defendant’s profits, and the costs of the action, 15
False Designation,
symbol, or device, or any false
U.S.C. § 1117(a).
Origin, or
designation of origin, false or
(3) In exceptional cases, reasonable attorney fees, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a).
Sponsorship, 15
misleading description of fact, or
(4) The court may order that any infringing articles bearing the word, term, name, symbol, or
U.S.C. § 1125(a)
false or misleading representation of
device be destroyed, 15 U.S.C. § 1118.
fact, which:
(A) is likely to cause confusion,
mistake, or deception as to the
affiliation, connection, or
association of such person with
another person, or as to the origin,
sponsorship, or approval of his or
her goods, services, or commercial
activities by another person, or
(B) in commercial advertising or
promotion, misrepresents the nature,
characteristics, qualities, or
geographic origin of his or her or
another person’s goods, services, or
commercial activities.

---

CRS-13
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Available
Dilution of Famous
Use in commerce of a mark or trade
(1) Injunctions, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1116(a), 1125(c)(1).
Trademarks, 15
name if such use causes dilutiond by
U.S.C. § 1125(c)
blurringe or tarnishmentf of the
Under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(5), owners of famous marks may also be entitled to the following
distinctive quality of a famous
additional remedies listed below if:
trademark.
! the mark or trade name that is likely to cause dilution by blurring or dilution
by tarnishment was first used in commerce by the alleged infringer after
Oct. 6, 2006; and
! (A) in a dilution by blurring action, the person willfully intended to trade on
the recognition of the famous mark; or (B) in a dilution by tarnishment
action, the person willfully intended to harm the reputation of the famous
mark.
(2) For a willful violation, any damages sustained by the plaintiff, defendant’s profits, and
the costs of the action, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a).
(3) In exceptional cases, reasonable attorney fees, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a).
(4) For a willful violation, the court may order that any infringing articles bearing the word,
term, name, symbol, or device be destroyed, 15 U.S.C. § 1118.

---

CRS-14
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Available
Cyberpiracy and
Registering of, trafficking in,
(1) Injunctions, 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a).
Cybersquatting in
offering to sell, or use of an Internet
(2) Any damages sustained by the plaintiff, defendant’s profits, and the costs of the action, 15
Connection With
domain name that is
U.S.C. § 1117(a).
Internet Domain
(3) Statutory damages (at the election of the plaintiff to recover instead of actual damages
Names, 15 U.S.C. §
(A) identical or confusingly similar
and profits), in the amount of not less than $1,000 and not more than $100,000 per domain
1125(d)
to a trademark that is distinctive at
name, as the court considers just, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(d).
the time the domain name is
(4) In exceptional cases, reasonable attorney fees, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a).
registered; or
(5) Forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the
owner of the mark, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(1)(C)
(B) identical, confusingly similar to,
or dilutive of a trademark that is
If the trademark owner is not able to obtain in personam jurisdiction over a person who
famous at the time the domain name
would have been a defendant in this action (for example, the domain name registrant lives in
is registered,
a foreign country), or is otherwise unable through due diligence to identify the person to
bring such an action, the trademark owner may file an in rem civil action against a domain
with a bad faith intent to profit from
name in the judicial district in which the domain name registrar, domain name registry, or
the goodwill of another’s
other domain name authority that registered or assigned the domain name is located. In such
trademark.
an in rem action, the remedies are limited to a court order for the forfeiture or cancellation of
the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark, 15 U.S.C. §
1125(d)(2).
Cyberpiracy
Registering an Internet domain
(1) Injunctive relief, including the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the
Protection for
name, on or after November 29,
transfer of the domain name to the plaintiff, 15 U.S.C. § 1129(2).
Individuals, 15 U.S.C.
1999, that consists of the name of
(2) Costs and attorneys fees to the prevailing party, at the court’s discretion, 15 U.S.C. §
§ 1129
another living person, or a name
1129(2).
substantially and confusingly
similar thereto, without that
person’s consent, with the specific
intent to profit from such name by
selling the domain name for
financial gain to that person or any
third party.

---

CRS-15
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Available
Importation of
Importing goods bearing infringing
(1) Seizure by the U.S. Customs Serviceh and, in the absence of the written consent of the
Merchandise Bearing
marks or names that are identical
trademark owner, forfeiture for violations of the customs laws.
Counterfeit Mark,19
with, or substantially
(2) Upon seizure of such merchandise, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland
U.S.C. § 1526(e); 15
indistinguishable from, registered
Security shall notify the owner of the trademark, and shall, after forfeiture, destroy the
U.S.C. §1124
marks, in violation of Section 526
merchandise. If, however, the merchandise is not unsafe or a hazard to health, and the
of the Tariff Act of 1930, and
trademark owner provides his consent to the Secretary, the Secretary may remove the
Section 42 of the Lanham Act.g
trademark (if feasible) and dispose of the seized goods by giving it to federal, state, and local
government agencies or to charitable organizations that the Secretary believes have a need
Transshipment and
Transshipping through or exporting
for such merchandise. If none of these parties have established such a need, and it has been
Exportation of
from the United States counterfeit
at least 90 days after the date of forfeiture, the Customs Service may sell the merchandise at
Counterfeit Goods
goods or services
public auction.
and Services, 18
(3) Any person who directs, assists financially or otherwise, or aids and abets the importation
U.S.C. § 2320(h)
of merchandise for sale or public distribution that is seized in violation of this offense is
subject to a civil fine. For the first seizure of such merchandise, the fine shall be not more
than the domestic value of the merchandise as if it had been genuine, according to the
manufacturer’s suggested retail price. For the second seizure and thereafter, the fine shall be
not more than twice the value that the merchandise would have had if it were genuine. The
imposition of this fine is within the discretion of the Customs Service, and is in addition to
any other civil or criminal penalty or other remedy authorized by law, 19 U.S.C. § 1526(f).
a. The term “colorable imitation” includes any mark which so resembles a registered mark as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake or to deceive. 15 U.S.C. § 1127.
b. Although the Lanham Act does not define what constitutes an “exceptional” case, federal courts have determined that malicious, fraudulent, deliberate, or willful trademark
infringement could qualify for this characterization. See, e.g., United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc., 205 F.3d 1219, 1232 (10th Cir. 2000).
c. A “counterfeit mark or designation” means: (1) a counterfeit of a mark that is registered on the principal register of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or (2) a spurious
designation that is identical with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a designation relating to the United States Olympic Committee and other sports-related symbols and
names protected under 36 U.S.C. § 220506. 15 U.S.C. § 1116(d).
d. “Dilution” is statutorily defined in 15 U.S.C. § 1127 to mean “the lessening of the capacity of a famous mark to identify and distinguish goods or services, regardless of the presence
or absence of ... (1) competition between the owner of the famous mark and other parties, or (2) likelihood of confusion, mistake, or deception.”
e. “Blurring” occurs when the famous mark’s ability to identify its product has been impaired due to an association in the minds of consumers arising from similarity between another
mark and the famous mark. 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(2)(B).
f. Tarnishment occurs when the reputation of a famous mark has been harmed by negative associations arising from the similarity between another mark and the famous mark. 15
U.S.C. § 1125(c)(2)(C). Situations in which tarnishment could result are when a famous trademark is “linked to products of shoddy quality, or is portrayed in an unwholesome
or unsavory context, with the result that the public will associate the lack of quality or lack of prestige in the defendant’s goods with the plaintiff’s unrelated goods.” Hormel
Foods Corp. v. Jim Henson Prods., 73 F.3d 497, 507 (2d Cir. 1996) (citations and internal quotations omitted).
g. Under the “personal use exemption,” 19 U.S.C. §1526(d)(1), this restriction does not apply to the importation of one article bearing a protected trademark that accompanies any
traveler arriving in the United States, when such article is for his personal use and not for sale.

---

CRS-16
h. Pursuant to agency policy, the U.S. Customs Service prioritizes enforcement efforts on trademarks and trade names that are recorded with U.S. Customs Service. U.S. Customs
Directive No. 2310-008A (April 2000), available at [http://www.cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/trade/legal/directives/2310-008a.ctt/2310-008a.pdf]. Trademarks registered by the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may be recorded with U.S. Customs if the registration is current. 19 C.F.R. § 133.1.
Patent
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Available
Patent Infringement,
(a) Unauthorized making, using, or
(1) Injunctions, 35 U.S.C. § 283.
35 U.S.C. §§ 271; 281-
selling any patented invention within
(2) Damages adequate to compensate for the infringement (including lost profits if the
297.
the United States or importing into the
patent holder can demonstrate a causal connection between the infringement and the
United States any patented invention
unearned profits), but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use of the invention
during the patent term;
by the infringer, together with interest and costs as determined by the court, 35 U.S.C. §
(b) Actively inducing patent
284. The court may receive expert testimony as an aid to the determination of damages or
infringement;
of what royalty would be reasonable under the circumstances.
(c) Selling within the United States or
(3) The court in its discretion (for example, in cases of egregious, willful infringement)
importing into the United States a
may increase the damages up to three times the amount found or assessed by either the
component of a patented invention, for
jury or the court, 35 U.S.C. § 284.
use in practicing a patented process,
(4) In exceptional cases, the court may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing
constituting a material part of the
party, 35 U.S.C. § 285.
invention, knowing it to be especially
made for use in an infringement of
NOTE: Monetary damages shall not be awarded for any infringement committed more
such patent;
than 6 years prior to the filing of the complaint or counterclaim for infringement, 35
(d) Manufacturing within the United
U.S.C. § 286.
States the components of a patented
invention and then exporting those
disassembled parts for combination
abroad into an end product.
Infringement of a
Unauthorized application of a patented
(1) The offender is liable to the patent design owner to the extent of his total profit, but in
Design Patent, 35
design (or any colorable imitation
no event less than $250, recoverable in any U.S. district court having jurisdiction of the
U.S.C. § 289
thereof) to any article of manufacture
parties.
for the purpose of sale, or the sale of
(2) The remedies for patent infringement described in the box immediately above may also
such article.
be available to the owner of a design patent infringed in this manner, but he is not allowed
to twice recover the profit made from the infringement, 35 U.S.C. § 289.

---

CRS-17
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Available
False Marking of
(1) Unauthorized use in connection
(1) A fine of not more than $500 for every such offense, 35 U.S.C. § 392(a).
Patent-related
with anything made, used, or sold
(2) Any person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person
Information in
within the United States, or imported
suing and the other to the use of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 392(b).
Connection with
into the United States, of the name of a
Articles Sold to the
patent owner, patent number, or the
Public, 35 U.S.C. §
words “patent” or “patentee,” with the
292
intent of counterfeiting the mark of the
patentee, or of deceiving the public;
(2) Marking any unpatented article
with the word “patent” or any word or
number, for the purpose of deceiving
the public; or
(3) Using the words “patent applied
for,” “patent pending,” or any word
falsely suggesting that a patent
application has been made or is
pending, for the purpose of deceiving
the public.
Unauthorized Use or
(1) Use or manufacture of a patented
(1) An action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for the
Manufacture of a
invention by or for the United States
recovery of the patent holder’s reasonable and entire compensation for such use and
Patented Invention by
government without the patent
manufacture.
or for the United
owner’s authorization.
(2) Reasonable and entire compensation shall include the owner’s reasonable costs,
States,a28 U.S.C. §
including reasonable fees for expert witnesses and attorneys, in pursuing the action if the
1498(a)
patent owner is an independent inventor, a nonprofit organization, or an entity that had no
more than 500 employees at any time during the 5-year period preceding the use or
manufacture of the patented invention by or for the United States. However, unless the
action has been pending for more than 10 years from the time of filing to the time that the
owner applies for such costs and fees, reasonable and entire compensation shall not
include such costs and fees if the court finds that the position of the United States was
substantially justified or that special circumstances make an award unjust.
a. A state (or instrumentality thereof) that infringes a patent may not be sued by the patent holder because of the Eleventh Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Legislation that would
have abrogated the states’ sovereign immunity from patent infringement lawsuits was invalidated by the U.S. Supreme Court in the late 1990s. See Florida Prepaid v. College
Savings, 527 U.S. 627 (1999).

---

CRS-18
Unfair Competition
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Available
Unfair Practices in
Infringement by importing
(1) General or limited exclusion orders issued by the ITC barring the importation of
Import Trade, 19
counterfeit and infringing products
infringing products into the United States (enforced by the U.S. Bureau of Customs and
U.S.C. § 1337a
into the United States.
Border Protection).
(2) Cease and desist orders issued by the ITC to specific U.S. persons to prohibit the use or
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
purchase of such infringing products from abroad (enforced by the ITC), 19 U.S.C. §§
grants intellectual property rights
1337(d)-(f).
holders the right to seek relief from
(3) Monetary damages are not available in a Section 337 proceeding, although the
the United States International Trade
intellectual property owner can seek such monetary relief by filing a suit in federal district
Commission (ITC), for the
court.
importation of goods that infringe a
(4) Civil forfeiture is authorized if the owner or importer of the infringing article previously
trademark, patent, or copyright. To
attempted to import the article into the United States, 19 U.S.C. § 1337(i).
initiate a “Section 337 action,”
(5) Anyone who violates an order of the ITC must pay to the United States a civil penalty
intellectual property rights owners
for each day on which an importation of articles, or their sale, occurs in violation of the
must file a complaint with the ITC to
order. The amount of the civil penalty is to be not more than the greater of $100,000 or
allege unfair acts in the importation
twice the domestic value of the articles entered or sold on such day in violation of the ITC’s
of infringing goods into the United
order. To recover the civil penalty, the ITC may bring a civil action in the U.S. District
States.
Court for the District of Columbia or in the district in which the violation occurs, 19 U.S.C.
§ 1337(f)(2).
a. While the majority of Section 337 cases usually involve a claim of patent infringement, the statute expressly allows trademark and copyright owners to seek relief, 19 U.S.C. §
1337(a)(1)(B)(i) (registered copyrighted work), 19 U.S.C. § 1337(a)(1)(C) (registered U.S. trademark).

---

CRS-19
Trade Secrets
Cause of Action
Description of Violation
Remedies Available
Theft of a Trade
With intent or knowledge that the offense
The Attorney General of the United States may, in a civil action brought in a U.S.
Secret to Benefit a
will benefit any foreign government, foreign
district court, obtain appropriate injunctive relief, 18 U.S.C. § 1836.
Foreign Entity, 18
instrumentality, or foreign agent, knowingly:
U.S.C. § 1831
(1) stealing or without authorization taking
or obtaining a trade secret; (2) without
authorization copying, destroying, or
transmitting a trade secret; (3) receiving,
buying, or possessing a trade secret, knowing
it to have been stolen or obtained without
authorization; (4) attempting to commit any
offense described above; (5) conspiring with
one or more other persons to commit any
offense described above, and one or more of
such persons do any act to effect the object
of the conspiracy.
Theft of Trade Secrets
With intent to convert a trade secret related
The Attorney General of the United States may, in a civil action brought in a U.S.
for Commercial
to a product that is placed in interstate or
district court, obtain appropriate injunctive relief, 18 U.S.C. § 1836.
Advantage, 18 U.S.C.
foreign commerce, to the economic benefit
§ 1832
of anyone other than the owner thereof, and
intending or knowing that the offense will
injure any owner of that trade secret,
knowingly: (1) stealing, or without
authorization taking or obtaining such
information; (2) without authorization
copying, destroying, or communicating a
trade secret; (3) receiving, buying, or
possessing a trade secret, knowing it to have
been stolen or obtained without
authorization; (4) attempting to commit any
offense described above; (5) conspiring with
one or more other persons to commit any
offense described above, and one or more of
such persons do any act to effect the object
of the conspiracy.

---

CRS-20
Criminal Penalties
Copyright
Criminal Law
Description of Offense
Authorized Penalties
Copyright
Willful infringement of
(1) If the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution (including by electronic means)
Infringement for
copyright for purposes of
during any 180-day period of at least 10 copies of one or more copyrighted works, which have a
Profit, 17 U.S.C. §
commercial advantage or
total retail value of more than $2,500, an imprisonment sentence of not more than 5 years, or a
506(a)(1)(A), 18
private financial gain.
fine in the amount of up to $250,000, or both (for corporate offenders or an organization, up to a
U.S.C. § 2319(b)
$500,000 fine is permitted), 18 U.S.C. § 2319(b)(1).
(2) If the offense is a felony and is a second or subsequent offense, the maximum imprisonment
term is doubled to 10 years, or a fine of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for organizations), or both, 18
U.S.C. § 2319(b)(2).
(3) Anyone who commits this offense in any other case is subject to an imprisonment sentence of
not more than 1 year, or a fine of up to $100,000 ($200,000 for organizations), or both, 18 U.S.C.
§ 2319(b)(3).
(4) Civil and criminal forfeiture of any article (the making or trafficking of which is prohibited
by this offense), any property used (or intended to be used) in any manner or part to commit or
facilitate the commission of this offense, and any property derived constituting or derived from
any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the commission of the offense, 17
U.S.C. § 506(b), 18 U.S.C. § 2323.
(5) Mandatory restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2323(c).

---

CRS-21
Criminal Law
Description of Offense
Authorized Penalties
Copyright
Willful infringement of a
(1) If the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution of 10 or more copies of 1 or more
Infringement Without
copyright by reproducing or
copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of $2,500 or more, a statutory maximum
Profit Motive, 17
distributing, including by
penalty of 3 years imprisonment, or a fine of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for organizations), or
U.S.C. § 506(a)(1)(B),
electronic means, during any
both, 18 U.S.C. § 2319(c)(1).
18 U.S.C. § 2319(c)
180-day period, one or more
(2) If the offense is a felony and is a second or subsequent offense, the maximum imprisonment
copies of one or more
term is 6 years, or a fine of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for organizations), or both, 18 U.S.C. §
copyrighted works which have a
2319(c)(2).
total retail value of more than
(3) If the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution of 1 or more copies of 1 or more
$1,000.
copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $1,000, an imprisonment
sentence of not more than 1 year, or a fine of up to $100,000 ($200,000 for organizations), or
both, 18 U.S.C. § 2319(c)(3).
(4) Civil and criminal forfeiture of any article (the making or trafficking of which is prohibited
by this offense), any property used (or intended to be used) in any manner or part to commit or
facilitate the commission of this offense, and any property derived constituting or derived from
any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the commission of the offense, 17
U.S.C. § 506(b), 18 U.S.C. § 2323.
(5) Mandatory restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2323(c).

---

CRS-22
Criminal Law
Description of Offense
Authorized Penalties
Pre-Release
Distributing a copyrighted work
If infringement committed for commercial
If infringement has no commercial purpose:
Distribution of a
being prepared for commercial
purpose:
Copyrighted Work
distribution, by making it
(1) For a first offense, imprisonment of not
Over a Publicly-
available on a publicly-
(1) Imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or
more than 3 years, or a fine of up to $250,000
Accessible Computer
accessible computer network, if
a fine of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for
($500,000 for organizations), or both, 18
Network,
the infringer knew or should
organizations), or both, 18 U.S.C. §
U.S.C. § 2319(d)(1).
17 U.S.C.
have known that the work was
2319(d)(2). If the offense is a felony and is a
(2) If the offense is a felony and is a second or
§ 506(a)(1)(C), 18
intended for commercial
second or subsequent offense, the maximum
subsequent offense, the maximum
U.S.C. § 2319(d)
distribution.
imprisonment term is 10 years, or a fine of up
imprisonment term is 6 years, or a fine of up to
to $250,000 ($500,000 for organizations), or
$250,000 ($500,000 for organizations), or
both, 18 U.S.C. § 2319(d)(4).
both, 18 U.S.C. § 2319(d)(3).
(2) Civil and criminal forfeiture of any article
(3) Civil and criminal forfeiture of any article
(the making or trafficking of which is
(the making or trafficking of which is
prohibited by this offense), any property used
prohibited by this offense), any property used
(or intended to be used) in any manner or part
(or intended to be used) in any manner or part
to commit or facilitate the commission of this
to commit or facilitate the commission of this
offense, and any property derived constituting
offense, and any property derived constituting
or derived from any proceeds obtained directly
or derived from any proceeds obtained directly
or indirectly as a result of the commission of
or indirectly as a result of the commission of
the offense, 17 U.S.C. § 506(b), 18 U.S.C. §
the offense, 17 U.S.C. § 506(b), 18 U.S.C. §
2323.
2323.
(3) Mandatory restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2323(c).
(4) Mandatory restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2323(c).

---

CRS-23
Criminal Law
Description of Offense
Authorized Penalties
Circumvention of
Willfully and for purposes of
(1) For a first offense: imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or a fine of not more than
Copyright Protection
commercial advantage or
$500,000,a or both.
Systems in Violation
private financial gain:
(2) For the second or subsequent offense: imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or a fine of
of the Digital
not more than $1,000,000, or both.
Millennium
(1) Descrambling, decrypting,
Copyright Act
or otherwise avoiding,
(DMCA), 17 U.S.C. §
bypassing, removing,
1204
deactivating, or impairing a
technological measure, without
the authority of the copyright
owner, that effectively controls
access to a copyrighted work; or
(2) Manufacturing, importing,
offering to the public,
providing, or otherwise
trafficking in any technology,
product, service, device, or
component, that is primarily
designed or produced for the
purpose of circumventing
copyright protection measures.

---

CRS-24
Criminal Law
Description of Offense
Authorized Penalties
Bootleg Recordings of
Knowingly and for purposes of
(1) For a first offense, imprisonment of up to 5 years, or a fine of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for
Live Musical
commercial advantage or
organizations), or both.
Performances, 18
private financial gain:
(2) For a second or subsequent offense, the maximum imprisonment sentence doubles to 10 years
U.S.C.
(with the same fine amounts as the first offense).
§ 2319A
(1) making an unauthorized
(3) Civil and criminal forfeiture of any article (the making or trafficking of which is prohibited
recording of sounds or
by this offense), any property used (or intended to be used) in any manner or part to commit or
sounds/images of a live musical
facilitate the commission of this offense, and any property derived constituting or derived from
performance, or copies of such
any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the commission of the offense, 18
recording; (2) transmitting or
U.S.C. §§ 2319A(b), 2323.
other communication to the
(4) Mandatory restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2323(c).
public of such sounds and/or
images of a live musical
performance; or (3) distribution,
sale, or trafficking in any copy
of an unauthorized live musical
performance recording (whether
or not such recording was done
in the United States).
Unauthorized
Knowingly using an audiovisual
(1) For a first offense, imprisonment of not more than 3 years, or a fine of up to $250,000
Recording of Motion
recording device to transmit or
($500,000 for organizations).
Pictures in a Movie
make a copy of a motion picture
(2) For a second or subsequent offense, the maximum imprisonment sentence doubles to 6 years
Theater
from a performance of such
(with the same fine amounts as the first offense).
(Camcording), 18
work in a movie theater.
(3) Civil and criminal forfeiture of any article (the making or trafficking of which is prohibited
U.S.C.
by this offense), any property used (or intended to be used) in any manner or part to commit or
§ 2319B
facilitate the commission of this offense, and any property derived constituting or derived from
any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the commission of the offense, 18
U.S.C. §§ 2319B(b), 2323
(4) Mandatory restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2323(c).

---

CRS-25
Criminal Law
Description of Offense
Authorized Penalties
Counterfeit or Illicit
Knowingly trafficking in a
(1) Imprisonment of not more than 5 years, a fine of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for
Labels and
counterfeit label or illicit label
organizations), or both.
Counterfeit
affixed to, enclosing, or
(2) Civil and criminal forfeiture of any article (the making or trafficking of which is prohibited
Documentation and
accompanying a copyrighted
by this offense), any property used (or intended to be used) in any manner or part to commit or
Packaging for
work, or trafficking in
facilitate the commission of this offense, and any property derived constituting or derived from
Copyrighted Works,
counterfeit documentation or
any proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the commission of the offense, 18
18 U.S.C. § 2318
packaging.
U.S.C. §§ 2318(d), 2323.
(3) Mandatory restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2323(c).
a. The fines listed in this box are the same for an individual or for organizations.

---

CRS-26
Trademark
Criminal Law
Description of Offense
Authorized Penalties
Trafficking in
(1) Intentionally trafficking or attempting to
(1) For a first offense, imprisonment of not more than 10 years, or a fine of not
Counterfeit
traffic in goods or services and knowingly
more than $2,000,000 ($5,000,000 for organizations), or both.
Trademarks, Service
using a counterfeit marka on or in connection
(2) For a second or subsequent offense, the maximum imprisonment term doubles
Marks, and
with such goods or services;
to 20 years, and the maximum fines increase to $5,000,000 ($15,000,000 for
Certification Marks,
organizations).
18 U.S.C. § 2320
(2) Intentionally trafficking or attempting to
(3) If the offender knowingly or recklessly causes or attempts to cause serious
traffic in labels, patches, stickers, wrappers,
bodily injury from conduct in violation of this offense, imprisonment of not more
badges, emblems, medallions, charms, boxes,
than 20 years, a fine of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for organizations), or both, 18
containers, cans, cases, hangtags,
U.S.C. § 2320(a)(2)(A).
documentation, or packaging of any type or
(4) If the offender knowingly or recklessly causes or attempts to cause death from
nature, knowing that a counterfeit mark has
conduct in violation of this offense, imprisonment for any term of years up to life,
been applied thereto, the use of which is likely
or a fine of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for organizations), or both, 18 U.S.C. §
to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to
2320(a)(2)(B).
deceive.
(5) Civil and criminal forfeiture of any article (the making or trafficking of which
is prohibited by this offense), any property used (or intended to be used) in any
manner or part to commit or facilitate the commission of this offense, and any
property derived constituting or derived from any proceeds obtained directly or
indirectly as a result of the commission of the offense, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2320(b), 2323.
(6) Mandatory restitution, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2320(b), 2323(c).
a. 18 U.S.C. § 2320(e) defines “counterfeit mark” for the purposes of this offense as a spurious mark that: (1) is used in connection with trafficking in any goods, services, labels,
patches, stickers, wrappers, badges, emblems, medallions, charms, boxes, containers, cans, cases, hangtags, documentation, or packaging of any type or nature; (2) is identical
with, or substantially indistinguishable from, a mark registered on the principal register in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and in use, whether or not the defendant
knew such mark was so registered; (3) is applied to or used in connection with the goods or services for which the mark is registered with the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, or is applied to or consists of a label, patch, sticker, wrapper, badge, emblem, medallion, charm, box, container, can, case, hangtag, documentation, or packaging of any
type or nature that is designed, marketed, or otherwise intended to be used on or in connection with the goods or services for which the mark is registered in the United States
Patent and Trademark Office; and (4) the use of which is likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive.

---

CRS-27
Trade Secrets
Criminal Law
Description of Offense
Authorized Penalties
Trade Secret Theft to
With intent or knowledge that the offense will benefit
(1) Imprisonment of up to 15 years, or a fine of up to $500,000
Benefit a Foreign
any foreign government, foreign instrumentality, or
($10,000,000 for organizations), or both.
Entity, 18 U.S.C. §
foreign agent, knowingly: (1) stealing or without
(2) Civil and criminal forfeiture of any article (the making or trafficking of
1831
authorization taking or obtaining a trade secret; (2)
which is prohibited by this offense), any property used (or intended to be
without authorization copying, destroying, or
used) in any manner or part to commit or facilitate the commission of this
transmitting a trade secret; (3) receiving, buying, or
offense, and any property derived constituting or derived from any
possessing a trade secret, knowing it to have been
proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the commission of the
stolen or obtained without authorization; (4)
offense, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1834, 2323.
attempting to commit any offense described above;
(3) Mandatory restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2323(c).
(5) conspiring with one or more other persons to
commit any offense described above, and one or more
of such persons do any act to effect the object of the
conspiracy.
Theft of Trade Secrets
With intent to convert a trade secret related to a
(1) Imprisonment of up to 10 years, or a fine of up to $250,000 ($5,000,000
for Commercial
product that is placed in interstate or foreign
for organizations), or both.
Advantage, 18 U.S.C.
commerce, to the economic benefit of anyone other
(2) Civil and criminal forfeiture of any article (the making or trafficking of
§ 1832
than the owner thereof, and intending or knowing that
which is prohibited by this offense), any property used (or intended to be
the offense will injure any owner of that trade secret,
used) in any manner or part to commit or facilitate the commission of this
knowingly: (1) stealing, or without authorization
offense, and any property derived constituting or derived from any
taking or obtaining such information; (2) without
proceeds obtained directly or indirectly as a result of the commission of the
authorization copying, destroying, or communicating
offense, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1834, 2323.
a trade secret; (3) receiving, buying, or possessing a
(3) Mandatory restitution, 18 U.S.C. § 2323(c).
trade secret, knowing it to have been stolen or
obtained without authorization; (4) attempting to
commit any offense described above; (5) conspiring
with one or more other persons to commit any offense
described above, and one or more of such persons do
any act to effect the object of the conspiracy.

---