Order Code RS22713
Updated September 22, 2008
Health and Safety Concerns Over U.S. Imports
of Chinese Products: An Overview
Wayne M. Morrison
Specialist in International Trade and Finance
Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division
Summary
China is a major source of U.S. imports of consumer products (such as toys) and
an increasingly important supplier of various food products. Reports of unsafe seafood,
pet food, toys, tires, and other products imported from China over the past year or so
have raised concern in the United States over the health, safety, and quality of imported
Chinese products. This report provides an overview of this issue and implications for
U.S.-China trade relations and will be updated as events warrant.
In 2007, China overtook Canada to became the largest source of U.S. imports (at
$322 billion); about 17% of all U.S. imports now come from China. Over the past year
or so, numerous recalls and warnings have been issued by U.S. firms over various
products imported from China, due to health and safety concerns. This has led many U.S.
policymakers to question the adequacy of China’s regulatory environment in ensuring that
its exports to the United States meet U.S. standards for health, safety, and quality; as well
as the ability of U.S. government regulators, importers, and retailers to identify and take
action against unsafe imports (from all countries) before they enter the U.S. market.
Warnings, Recalls, and Detentions
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2007 issued warnings and
announced voluntary recalls on certain pet foods (and products use to manufacture pet
food and animal feed) from China believed to have caused the sickness and deaths of
numerous pets in the United States. In May 2007, the FDA issued warnings on certain
toothpaste products (some of which were found to be counterfeit) found to originate in
China that contained poisonous chemicals. In June 2007, the FDA announced import
controls on all farm-raised catfish, basa, shrimp, dace (related to carp), and eel from China
after antimicrobial agents, which are not approved in the United States for use in farm-
raised aquatic animals, were found. Such shipments will be detained until they are proven
to be free of contaminants. On January 25, 2008, the FDA posted on its website a notice
by Baxter Healthcare Corporation that it had temporarily halted the manufacture of its
multiple-dose vials of heparin (a blood thinner) for injection because of recent reports of

CRS-2
serious adverse events (including an estimated81 deaths and hundreds of complications)
associated with the use of this drug. On February 18, 2008, the New York Times reported
that a Chinese firm that produces an active ingredient used to produce heparin was not
certified by the Chinese government to make the drug and had not undergone FDA
inspection; many have speculated that the Chinese plant is likely the source of the
problem.1 On September 12, 2008, the FDA issued a health information advisory on
infant formula in response to reports of contaminated milk-based infant formula
manufactured and sold in China.2
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in June 2007
was informed by Foreign Tire Sales Inc., an importer of foreign tires, that it suspected that
up to 450,000 tires (later reduced to 255,000 tires) made in China may have a major safety
defect (i.e., missing or insufficient gum strip inside the tire). The company was ordered
by the NHTSA to issue a recall. The Chinese government and the manufacturer have
maintained that the tires in question meet or exceed U.S. standards.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued alerts and announced
voluntary recalls by U.S. companies on numerous products made in China in 2007. From
January-December 2007, over four-fifths of CPSC recall notices involved Chinese
products.3 Over this period, roughly 17.6 million toy units were recalled because of
excessive lead levels. Recalls were also issued on 9.5 million Chinese-made toys
(because of the danger of loose magnets), 4.2 million “Aqua Dots” toys (because beads
contain a chemical that can turn toxic if ingested) and 1 million toy ovens (due to
potential finger entrapment and burn hazzards).4

U.S. Imports of Products of Concern from China5
Table 1 lists products imported from China in 2007 that have been the subject of
recent U.S. health and safety concerns, such as toys, seafood, tires, animal foods, organic
chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and toothpaste. It indicates that China was a major
source of imports for many of these products. For example, China was the largest
supplier of imported toys (89% of total), seafood products (15%), and tires (26%); the 2nd
largest foreign supplier of animal food products (24%); the 6th largest supplier of
toothpaste (1%); and the 9th largest source of imported pharmaceuticals and organic
chemicals (3%). The table also indicates that, despite health and safety concerns, U.S.
imports of most of the products listed (with the exception of toothpaste) increased in 2007
over 2006 levels. For example, toy imports from China grew by 33.4%.
1 New York Times, China Didn’t Check Drug Supplier, Files Show, February 16, 2008.
2 On September 22, 2008, China Daily reported that melamine-tainted formula had to date killed
three children and sickened 53,000 others (13,000 of which had to be hospitalized).
3 According to the CPSC, there were 61 toy recalls in 2007 compared with 40 in 2006.
4 For a list of company recalls of Chinese products, see the CPSC website at
[http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prerel.html].
5 For an overview of issues concerning U.S. food imports from China, see CRS Report RL34080,
Food and Agricultural Imports from China, by Geoffrey S. Becker.

CRS-3
Table 1. U.S. Imports of Selected Products from China in 2007
Percentage
China’s Rank
Imports from
Change in
Imports from
as a Source of
China as a %
Imports in
China
Imported
of Total U.S.
2007 over
Product Description
($ millions)
Product
Imports (%)
2006 (%)
Dolls, toys, and
games
19,460.5
1
89.4
33.4
Fish and other
seafood products
2,054.3
1
14.9
4.8
Tires
2,436.4
1
26.0
28.5
Animal foods
163.0
2
24.0
19.3
Toothpaste
1.3
6
1.0
-59.6
Organic chemicals
and pharmaceutical
products
3,235.3
9
3.4
25.0
Total imports from
China
321,507.8
1
16.5
11.7
Source: USITC DataWeb using various classifications systems and digit levels.
China’s Poor Regulatory System
China is believed to have a rather weak health and safety regime for manufactured
goods and agricultural products. Problems include weak consumer protection laws and
poorly enforced regulations, lack of inspections and ineffective penalties for code
violators, underfunded and understaffed regulatory agencies and poor interagency
cooperation, the proliferation of fake goods and ingredients, the existence of numerous
unlicensed producers, falsified export documents, extensive pollution,6 intense
competition that often induces firms to cut corners, the relative absence of consumer
protection advocacy groups, failure by Chinese companies to effectively monitor the
quality of their suppliers’ products, restrictions on the media,7 and extensive government
corruption and lack of accountability, especially at the local government level.
Chinese officials contend that most Chinese-made products are safe and note that
U.S. recalls for health and safety reasons have involved a number of countries (as well as
U.S. products). They also argue that some of the blame for recalled products belongs to
U.S. importers or by U.S. designers. They further contend that some U.S. products
imported into China have failed to meet Chinese standards.8 However, they have
6 For example, many fish farmers in China reportedly feed various drugs to the fish to help keep
them alive in polluted waters.
7 China’s media often reports on health and safety problems, but rarely criticizes the central
government for such problems.
8 Since June 2007, China has seized, rejected, or complained about U.S. shipments of orange pulp
(continued...)

CRS-4
acknowledged numerous product health and safety problems in China, as reflected in
reports that have appeared in China’s state-controlled media. For example, in June 2004,
the Chinese People’s Daily reported that fake baby formula had killed 50 to 60 infants in
China. In June 2006, the China Daily reported that 11 people had died from a tainted
injection used to treat gall bladders. In August 2006, Xinhua News Agency reported that
a defective antibiotic drug killed seven people and sickened many others.
China has announced a number of initiatives to improve and strengthen food and
drug safety supervision and standards, increase inspections, require safety certificates
before some products can be sold, and to crack down on government corruption:
! In May 2007, the Xinhua News Agency reported that former director of
China’s State Food and Drug Administration had been sentenced to death
for taking bribes (equivalent to $850,000) in return for approving
untested and/or fake medicines (he was executed on July 10, 2007). On
the same day, the Xinhua News Agency reported that the Chinese
government had announced that it would, by the end of 2007, complete
regulations for setting up a national food recall system would ban the sale
of toys that failed to pass a national compulsory safety certification.
! On June 27, 2007, the China Daily reported that a nationwide inspection
of the food production industry had found that a variety of dangerous
industrial raw materials had been used in the production of flour, candy,
pickles, biscuits, black fungus, melon seeds, bean curd, and seafood. As
a result, the government reportedly closed 180 food factories found to be
producing unsafe products and/or making fake commodities. It also
reported that in 2006, the government had conducted 10.4 million
inspections, uncovering problems in 360,000 food businesses, and had
closed 152,000 unlicensed food businesses.
! On July 4, 2007, the China Daily reported that the government had
finished making amendments to all food safety standards and had
established an emergency response mechanism among several ministries
to deal with major problems regarding food safety.
! On August 9, 2007, China Daily reported that the government had
pledged to spend $1 billion by 2010 to improve drug and food safety.
! On August 15, 2007, a spokesperson from the Chinese embassy in
Washington, DC, said that China would require that every food shipment
be inspected for quality by the government by September 1, 2007.
8 (...continued)
dried apricots, frozen chicken, pork products, pacemakers, soybeans, frozen potato slices, and
sardines. In September 2007, China reportedly ordered increased inspections of imported U.S.
products. Some analysts contend that these actions are retaliation for U.S. recalls of Chinese
products.

CRS-5
! On August 20, 2007, the Chinese government announced that it had
created a 19-member cabinet-level panel to oversee product quality and
food safety (headed by Vice-Premier Wu Yi) and would start a four-
month nationwide campaign to improve the quality of goods and food.
! On December 5, 2007, the government stated that during the first 10
months of the year, it had shut down 47,800 food factories without
operating licenses.
! On January 15, 2008, China announced it had inspected over 3,000
export-oriented toy manufacturers and had revoked licences for 600 firms
that failed to meet quality standards.
Despite these efforts, reports of tainted products persist. For example in January
2008, dozens of people in Japan reportedly became ill from eating dumplings imported
from China that contained pesticide. In addition, hundreds of cancer patients in China
were reportedly sickened by tainted drugs produced by a major Chinese drug company.
On September 16, 2008, China Daily reported that tainted baby formula had killed 2
infants and sickened more than 1,200 others.
The United States and China reached a number of agreements in 2007 to address
health and safety concerns:
! On September 11, 2007, the CPSC and its Chinese counterpart, the
General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and
Quarantine (AQSIQ), signed a Joint Statement on enhancing consumer
product safety. China pledged to implement a comprehensive plan to
intensify efforts (such as increased inspections, efforts to educate Chinese
manufacturers, bilateral technical personal exchanges and training,
regular meetings to exchange information with U.S. officials, and the
development of a product tracking system) to prevent exports of unsafe
products to the United States, especially in regard to lead paint and toys.
! On September 12, 2007, the NHTSA signed a Memorandum of
Cooperation with its Chinese counterpart on enhanced cooperation and
communication on vehicles and automotive equipment safety.
! On December 11, 2007, the U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS)
announced that it had signed two Memoranda of Agreement (MOA) with
its Chinese counterparts; the first covering specific food and feed items
that have been of concern to the United States, and the second covering
drugs and medical devices. Both MOAs would would require Chinese
firms that export such products to the United States to register with the
Chinese government and to obtain certification before they can export.
Such firms would also be subject to annual inspections to ensure they
meet U.S. standards. The MOAs also establish mechanisms for greater
information sharing, increase access of production facilities by U.S.
officials, and creates working group in order to boost cooperation. On
March 13, 2008, the FDA announced that it planned to place eight FDA

CRS-6
staffers in China. Some members of Congress have proposed placing a
CPSC official at the U.S. embassy in Beijing.
Economic Implications
Many Members of Congress have called for tighter rules (such as increased
inspections, certification requirements, and mandatory standards for toys), and increased
funding for U.S. product safety agencies. On December 19, 2007, the House passed
H.R. 4040 (Rush): the Consumer Product Safety Modernization Act. On March 6, 2008,
the Senate passed its version of H.R. 4040 as a substitute amendment (S. 2263: the CPSC
Reform Act
). House and Senate Conferees reached a compromise agreement on H.R.
4040 on July 28, 2008, and the bill was signed into law (P.L. 110-314) on August 14.9
Concerns over the health, safety, and quality of Chinese products could have a
number of important economic implications. Both the United States and China have
accused each other of using health and safety concerns as an excuse to impose
protectionist measures and some observers contend that this issue could lead to growing
trade friction between the two sides. International concerns over the safety of Chinese
exports may diminish the attractiveness of China as a destination for foreign investment
in export-oriented manufacturing, as well as for foreign firms that contract with Chinese
firms to make and export products under their labels (such as toys). Efforts by China to
restore international confidence in the health and safety of its exports through increased
inspections, certification requirements, mandatory testing, etc., could have a significant
impact on the cost of doing business in China, which could slow the pace of Chinese
exports and hurt employment in the export sector. Moreover, international concerns over
the safety of Chinese products could prove to be a setback to the government’s efforts to
develop and promote internationally recognized Chinese brands (such as cars), which it
views as important to the country’s future economic development. Thus, it is very likely
the Chinese government will take this issue very seriously. However, it is unclear how
long it will take for the central government to effectively address the numerous challenges
it faces (especially government corruption and counterfeiting) to ensure that its exports
comply with the health and safety standards of the United States and other trading
partners. Additionally, a sharp decrease in purchases by U.S. consumers of Chinese
products could negatively impact U.S. firms that import and/or sell such products and may
raise prices of some commodities as firms attempt to rectify various safety problems.
The current crisis in China over melamine-tainted milk (which can cause kidney
stones) and the growing number of children who have reportedly have become ill (tens
of thousands) have seriously challenged the government’s assertions that most products
made in China are safe and that an effective regulatory regime has been established. The
government announced on September 22, 2008, that China’s chief quality supervisor had
stepped down from his post over the incident. Other local and provincial officials have
reportedly been sacked for trying to cover up incident. At least 22 Chinese baby formula
companies have been found to have tainted products. Press reports indicate that other
milk products made in China may have been contaminated as well.
9 See CRS Report RL34399, Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008: H.R. 4040, by
Margaret Mikyung Lee, and CRS Report RS22821, Consumer Product Safety Commission:
Current Issues
, by Bruce Mulock.