The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) is a block grant program under which the federal government gives annual grants to states, the District of Columbia, U.S. territories and commonwealths, and Indian tribal organizations to operate multi-component home energy assistance programs for needy households. This report contains two tables that show estimated LIHEAP allocations to the states. Table 1 shows state allocations at various levels: (1) the amount appropriated for FY2006, (2) the amount appropriated for FY2007, (3) the amount appropriated in FY2008, and (4) estimated state allocations based on the amount requested by the President for FY2009. Table 2 shows estimated state allocations at other hypothetical appropriations increments. For detailed information on how the LIHEAP formula allocates funds to the states, see CRS Report RL33275, The LIHEAP Formula: Legislative History and Current Law, by [author name scrubbed]. This report will be updated when proposed funding levels change.
The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) is a block grant program under which the federal government gives annual grants to states, the District of Columbia, U.S. territories and commonwealths, and Indian tribal organizations to operate multi-component home energy assistance programs for needy households.1 Established in 1981 by Title XXVI of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (P.L. 97-35), LIHEAP has been reauthorized and amended several times, most recently in 2005, when the Energy Policy Act (P.L. 109-58) reauthorized annual regular LIHEAP funds at $5.1 billion per year from FY2005 to FY2007. The total LIHEAP appropriation in the FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 110-161) was approximately $2.57 billion. In FY2007 Congress appropriated $2.16 billion for the program (P.L. 110-5), and in FY2006, $3.161 billion was appropriated for LIHEAP (P.L. 109-149 and P.L. 109-204), the largest amount ever appropriated for the program.
The LIHEAP statute provides for two types of program funding: regular funds and contingency funds. This report focuses on the distribution of regular funds, sometimes referred to as block grant funds, which are allotted to states according to methods prescribed by the LIHEAP statute.2 The allotment method may change depending on the amount of funds appropriated by Congress. In both FY2007 and FY2008, $1.98 billion was allocated to regular funds, and in FY2006, $2.48 billion of the LIHEAP appropriation was distributed as regular funds. The second type of LIHEAP funding, called contingency funds, may be released and allotted to one or more states at the discretion of the President and the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). The contingency funds may be released at any point in the fiscal year to meet additional home energy assistance needs created by a natural disaster or other emergency.3 Of the total appropriated for LIHEAP in FY2008, approximately $590 million was for contingency funds.
In the FY2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 110-161), Congress appropriated $1.98 billion for the LIHEAP regular fund. P.L. 110-161 contained an across-the-board rescission of 1.747% that reduced the stated amounts appropriated for most Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education programs.4 The $1.98 billion appropriation for regular funds is the amount available after this rescission. The first distribution to the states of the regular funds appropriated in P.L. 110-161 occurred in December 2007. Then, on June 26, 2008, HHS announced that it would distribute funds that were thought to have been allocated to leveraging incentive and REACH grants in the FY2008 Appropriations Act as part of the regular fund formula grants. Since the early 1990s, leveraging incentive and REACH grants have been made to states and tribes on the basis of their ability to obtain non-LIHEAP resources for energy assistance (leveraging incentive grants) and for increasing energy efficiency of low-income households (REACH grants). In recent years, Congress has allocated around $27 million for these two funds. However, in FY2008, P.L. 110-161 did not appropriate funds for leveraging incentive and REACH grants. When HHS discovered that language to appropriate the funds was missing from the law, it released the $26.7 million that would otherwise have been distributed as leveraging incentive and REACH grants as part of the LIHEAP formula distribution. The addition of nearly $27 million to the formula grants caused the funds to be released under the "new" LIHEAP formula. For more information about how the LIHEAP formula distributes funds, see CRS Report RL33275, The LIHEAP Formula: Legislative History and Current Law, by [author name scrubbed].
Column (c) of Table 1 shows the amount of funds that were initially allocated to the states in FY2008 before HHS discovered that the leveraging incentive grants had not been appropriated in P.L. 110-161. Column (d) shows the total distributed to the states on June 26, 2008, which includes the $26.7 million in leveraging incentive grants. Column (b) of Table 1 shows the amounts allocated to the states in FY2007. For FY2009, the President has requested a total of $2 billion for LIHEAP; of this amount, $1.7 billion would be allocated to regular funds. Column (e) of Table 1 shows estimated allocations to the states at an appropriation of $1.7 billion. Column (a) shows the amount allotted to each state in FY2006, when $2.48 billion was appropriated for LIHEAP regular funds.
Following Table 1, Table 2 shows estimated allocations to the states at various hypothetical appropriations levels. These amounts are $1.75 billion, $2.0 billion, $2.25 billion, $2.5 billion, $2.75 billion, $3.0 billion, $4.0 billion, and $5.1 billion (the amount at which LIHEAP regular funds were last authorized in P.L. 109-58).
Table 1. LIHEAP Actual State Block Grant Fund Allotments for FY2006, FY2007, and FY2008, and Estimated Allotments for FY2009
($ in millions)
State |
FY2006 |
FY2007 |
FY2008 |
FY2008 |
FY2009 Est. Allotments at President's Request: |
||||||||||
Alabama |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Alaska |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Arizona |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Arkansas |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
California |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Connecticut |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
District of Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Hawaii |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Idaho |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Indiana |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Iowa |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Kansas |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Kentucky |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Louisiana |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Maine |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Maryland |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Minnesota |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Mississippi |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Missouri |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Montana |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
New Hampshire |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
New Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
New York |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
North Dakota |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Ohio |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Oklahoma |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Rhode Island |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
South Dakota |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Utah |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Vermont |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
West Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Wisconsin |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Wyoming |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) final allocations for FY2006, FY2007 and FY2008. Estimated allotments for FY2009 are CRS estimates based on factors provided by HHS.
Note: These estimates take into account current program practice where HHS sets aside funds out of the regular LIHEAP fund appropriation for the territories, training and technical assistance, leveraging incentive grants, and the Residential Energy Assistance Challenge Option Program (REACH). This has implications for the total amount of funds going directly to the states. For example, an appropriation of $1.98 billion is estimated to result in $1.95 billion in regular LIHEAP funds going directly to the states, after the amounts for these set-asides are subtracted from the total appropriation.
a. The total regular fund appropriation for FY2006 was $2.48 billion, $1.98 billion of which was appropriated in P.L. 109-149, and $500 million in P.L. 109-204. Initially, P.L. 109-149 appropriated $2.0 billion for regular funds, but the amount was subject to a 1% across-the-board rescission, resulting in a $1.98 billion appropriation (P.L. 109-148). In addition, both training and technical assistance and the leveraging incentive and REACH funds were reduced by 1% in column (a).
b. Congress approved a year-long continuing resolution for FY2007 (P.L. 110-5), which was enacted on February 15, 2007. The law provided that LIHEAP receive the same amount of funds for FY2007 that was appropriated for FY2006 in P.L. 109-149, as reduced by a 1% rescission (P.L. 109-148).
c. The initial allotments for FY2008 were slightly greater than for FY2007, despite the similar appropriations levels, due to a 1.747% across-the-board rescission for most Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education programs. See P.L. 110-161, Division G, Section 528. This meant that set asides for leveraging incentive and REACH grants, and for training and technical assistance, were slightly reduced from FY2007 levels.
d. On June 26, 2008, HHS released an additional $26.7 million in formula grants to the states. These funds had been set aside for leveraging incentive and REACH grants until HHS realized that Congress had not appropriated these funds in P.L. 110-161. As a result, distributions were re-calculated under the "new" LIHEAP formula, and additional funds were provided to the states.
e. For FY2009, the President's budget would allocate $27.225 million for leveraging incentive and REACH grants, and $297,000 for training and technical assistance. The estimates at $1.7 billion assume that these amounts would be set aside out of the regular LIHEAP fund.
Table 2. LIHEAP Estimated State Allotments
at Hypothetical Block Grant Fund Appropriations Levels
($ in millions)
State |
$1.75 billion |
$2.0 billion |
$2.25 billion |
$2.5 billion |
$2.75 billion |
$3.0 billion |
$4.0 billion |
$5.1 billion |
||||||||||||||||
Alabama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Alaska |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Arizona |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Arkansas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Connecticut |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Delaware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
District of Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Hawaii |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Idaho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Indiana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Iowa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Kansas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Kentucky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Louisiana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Maine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Maryland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Minnesota |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Mississippi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Missouri |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Montana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
New Hampshire |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
New Mexico |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
North Dakota |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Ohio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Oklahoma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Rhode Island |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
South Dakota |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Utah |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Vermont |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
West Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Wisconsin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Wyoming |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Congressional Research Service (CRS) calculations based on factors provided by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in May 2007.
Note: For each of these estimates, $27.5 million for leveraging incentive grants, $300,000 for training and technical assistance, and the estimated grants to the territories have been removed from the total hypothetical grant amounts.
1. |
For additional information on LIHEAP, see CRS Report RL31865, The Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP): Program and Funding, by [author name scrubbed]. |
2. |
See Section 2604(a)-(d) of the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Act (Title XXVI of P.L. 97-35), as amended. The section is codified at 42 U.S.C. ยง8623(a)-(d). |
3. |
Depending on how Congress appropriates them, contingency funds may remain available for distribution in more than one fiscal year or they may expire with the fiscal year for which they were appropriated. |
4. |
See Division G, Section 528 of P.L. 110-161. |