Order Code RS22779
January 8, 2008
Food Safety: Provisions in the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of 2007
Donna V. Porter
Specialist in Nutrition and Food Safety
Domestic Social Policy Division
Summary
The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA; P.L.110-
85), while primarily concerned with drug and device regulation and their user fees, also
contains several provisions on food safety. As enacted, the law requires the Secretary
of Health and Human Services to establish processing and ingredient standards, update
labeling requirements for pet food, and establish an early warning and surveillance
system to identify adulteration and outbreaks of illness associated with pet food. The
Secretary is to work with states to improve the safety of produce and strengthen state
food safety programs. The Act requires the Secretary to create a registry for reportable
information on foods with safety problems, which will help identify the supply chain of
the reportable food. Alerts are to be issued for such foods, with records maintained and
available for inspection. Additional provisions require attention to aquaculture and
seafood inspection, environmental risks associated with genetically engineered seafood
products, imported foods, pesticide monitoring, and ginseng dietary supplements.
On September 27, 2007, the President signed the Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA; P.L. 110-85, H.R. 3580) into law. The Act primarily
addresses issues such as regulation and user fees for prescription drugs and medical
devices, clinical trials, pediatric research incentives, and conflicts of interest.1 However,
the Act also contains several provisions on food safety that address recent concerns about
contaminated pet food and tracking adulterated foods. This report reviews the food safety
provisions of the statute, their history, and certain issues surrounding their passage. It will
not be updated.
1 Theses issues are described in considerable detail elsewhere. For further information, see CRS
Report RL34102, FDA Legislation in the 110th Congress: A Side-By-Side Comparison of S. 1082
and H.R. 2900
, by Erin D. Williams, Susan Thaul, Sarah A. Lister, Donna V. Porter, and C.
Stephen Redhead.

CRS-2
Background
The original language of the Senate bill on FDA reform (S. 1082), as introduced, did
not contain any provisions on food safety. However, around the time that the Committee
on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) was considering the bill, health
problems with food ingredients from China used in pet food came to the nation’s
attention. It was ultimately determined that wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate,
common pet food ingredients, had been deliberately tainted with melamine (an industrial
chemical used in the manufacture of plastics, flame-retardants, and other products) to
increase the nitrogen content of the products. The contamination of pet food is believed
to have led to the death of thousands of companion pets in the United States. Some
contaminated feed was also found on farms in the feed of food animals, but no harm came
to those food animals or to humans. Following this news, Senator Durbin and
Representative DeLauro introduced the Human and Pet Food Safety Act of 2007 in their
respective chambers (S. 1274 and H.R. 2108, respectively) to address the problem of pet
and human food contamination. The bills were assigned to committee, but no further
action has been taken.
With the FDA legislation on drugs and devices moving forward in the Senate,
Senator Durbin introduced as an amendment to S. 1082 several food safety provisions
contained in his bill. The amendment passed the Senate 94 to 0 and was sent as part of
the FDA reform bill to the House. The FDA reform bill that passed the House, H.R.
2900, did not include any food safety provisions. During the conference on S. 1082 and
H.R. 2900, certain changes were made to the legislation, including renumbering it as H.R.
3580 and modifying the final language in the food safety provisions, which are outlined
below. The provisions on food safety would primarily establish new statutory authorities.
Any amendments to current law are noted, where appropriate.
Food Safety Provisions in P.L.110-85
The food safety provisions are contained in Title X of P.L. 110-85, the FDA
Amendments Act of 2007.
Section 1001. Findings. This section contains various findings about the safety
and integrity of the U.S. food supply, illnesses and deaths caused by contaminated food,
the task of preserving the safety of the food supply, and the current level of U.S. food
imports and inspections.
Section 1002. Ensuring the Safety of Pet Food. This provision requires that
within two years, the Secretary, in consultation with other stakeholders, shall, by
regulation, establish processing and ingredient standards for pet food, as well as update
nutrition and ingredient labeling on pet food. The Secretary will have one year to
establish by regulation an early warning and surveillance system to identify adulteration
of the pet food supply and outbreaks of illness associated with pet food. The Secretary
shall, in establishing such a system, use surveillance and monitoring mechanisms similar
to, or in coordination with, those used by CDC, consulting with relevant professional
organizations and working with existing networks to inform veterinarians and others
during a pet food recall.

CRS-3
Section 1003. Ensuring Efficient and Effective Communications During
a Recall. During an ongoing recall of human or pet food, the Secretary shall work with
relevant stakeholders to collect and aggregate pertinent information through existing
networks of communication, including in electronic form, and post information regarding
the recall on FDA’s website in an easily accessible form.
Section 1004. State and Federal Cooperation. The Secretary shall work with
the states on activities and programs that assist in improving the safety of fresh and
processed produce to facilitate coordination and cost-effectiveness. The Secretary shall
encourage states to strengthen their food safety programs, especially for retail commercial
food establishments, and establish procedures and requirements for ensuring that
processed produce is not unsafe for human consumption. The Secretary may provide
assistance to states in implementing their food safety programs in the following areas:
advisory, technical, training, laboratory, and financial. Under an agreement with a
federal, state, or local agency, the Secretary may use, on a reimbursable basis, the
personnel, services, and facilities of the agency to assist states.
Section 1005. Reportable Food Registry. The Act amends the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act to create a new section 417 that requires the Secretary within one
year to establish an adulterated food registry within FDA, to which reportable adulterated
food cases may be submitted via electronic portal by public health officials and other
responsible parties. The Secretary shall review and determine the validity of information
submitted for the purpose of identifying adulterated food and shall exercise other existing
food safety authorities to protect public health. The Secretary shall issue an alert if a food
is a reportable adulterated food. A responsible party, who determines that a food is a
reportable adulterated food, has 24 hours to report to FDA through the electronic system
and must investigate the cause of the adulteration if the food originated with the
responsible party. No report to FDA is required if the responsible party detected the
adulteration prior to any transfer of the food or if the adulteration was corrected or the
food was destroyed. The Act outlines the data elements required for reporting to FDA for
the registry.
The Secretary shall create a numbering system that allows reports to be linked and
amended and that identifies the supply chain for the reportable food. The Secretary shall
promptly review a report and require the responsible party to notify appropriate parties
in the supply chain and submit a subsequent report or amend a previous report with
further information as it becomes available. The Secretary shall share information and
coordinate regulatory efforts with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) for any
report on a food product that is within USDA’s jurisdiction. The Secretary shall work
with state and local public health officials to share information and coordinate regulatory
efforts, while reducing duplication, to ensure coverage of the safety of the food supply
chain, including food establishments not registered with the FDA (e.g., restaurants).
Records must be maintained and available for inspection, if needed. The Secretary of
Homeland Security Secretary shall be notified immediately if it is suspected that such
food may have been deliberately adulterated. Failure to provide a report, or the
falsification of a report for food considered to be adulterated, is prohibited. Within nine
months, the Secretary shall issue guidance to industry about submitting reports to the
electronic portal and providing notification to other persons in the supply chain for a
reportable food.

CRS-4
Section 1006. Enhanced Aquaculture and Seafood Inspection. The
Secretary is authorized to enhance FDA’s aquaculture and seafood inspection regime
consistent with international agreements and U.S. law. The provision requires a report
to Congress within six months of enactment that describes the specifics of the inspection
program, the feasibility of developing traceability systems for catfish and seafood
products to both foreign and domestic processing plants, and an assessment of the risks
associated with contaminants and banned substances. The Secretary may enter into
partnerships with the states to implement this inspection program for aquaculture and
seafood import products.
Section 1007. Consultation Regarding Genetically Engineered Seafood
Products. The FDA Commissioner shall consult with the Assistant Administrator of
the National Marine Fisheries Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration to produce a report on any environmental risks associated with any
genetically engineered seafood products, including the impact on wild fish stocks.
Section 1008. Sense of Congress. This provision states that it is vital for
Congress to provide FDA with additional resources, authorities, and direction to ensure
the safety of the U.S. food supply, and to provide additional inspectors to improve FDA’s
ability to safeguard the U.S. food supply. Further, the Secretary should prioritize entering
into agreements with U.S. trading partners with regard to food safety, because of the
increased volume of international trade in food products, and Congress should work to
develop a comprehensive response to the issue of food safety.
Section 1009. Annual Report to Congress. The Secretary shall submit an
annual report to the appropriate congressional authorizing and appropriations committees
that includes the number and amount of imported food products aggregated by country
and type of food, a listing of the number of FDA inspectors of imported food and the
number of inspections performed, and aggregate data on the findings of inspections,
including data on the violations and enforcement actions used to follow up on the findings
and violations.
Section 1010. Publication of Annual Reports. This provision requires the
FDA Commissioner to submit to Congress and publish on the FDA website an annual
report containing the results of the agency’s pesticide monitoring program. The annual
report is to include information and analysis similar to that found in the FDA’s June 2005
report on pesticide residue monitoring, the results and analysis of the Ginseng Dietary
Supplements Special Survey, and certain specified data and other information on
interstate and imported shipments of food. Reports are to start with the fiscal years 2004-
2006 combined into a single report. The FDA Commissioner, the Administrator of the
Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), the Secretary of Commerce, and the head of
the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) shall enter into a memorandum of
understanding to permit inclusion in their reports of data from FSIS and AMS on meat,
poultry, eggs, and certain raw agricultural products.
Section 1011. Rule of Construction. This provision indicates that nothing in
the title affects the regulation of, or the adverse reporting system for, dietary supplements
created under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (P.L. 103-417)
or the Dietary Supplement and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act of 2006
(P.L.109-462), respectively.

CRS-5
Related Activities
The 110th Congress has held numerous hearings on food safety in both chambers
because several committees have FDA jurisdiction. While the primary focus has been the
safety of imported food, concerns about food safety in general and steps to take in
bringing the entire system up-to-date with current science, technology, and globalization
of the food supply are the underlying issues. In addition, numerous bills have been
introduced in both chambers on various aspects of food safety, several of which have been
the subject of the hearings. While all the bills have been assigned to the appropriate
committees, none has received any further action, except for the provisions in the FDA
Amendments Act of 2007 discussed above.
The Administration has addressed the recent food safety problems in several ways.
In May 2007, the FDA Commissioner appointed Dr. David Acheson to the new position
of FDA Assistant Commissioner for Food Protection. In this position, he will serve as
the coordinator for working with individual FDA product centers and the Office of
Regulatory Affairs to coordinate FDA’s food safety and security of the food supply
assignments and commitments. In addition, Dr. Acheson will serve as the FDA
Commissioner’s direct liaison to the Department of Health and Human Services and other
federal departments and agencies on interagency initiatives on food safety. In November
2007, he completed the integrated strategic plan for protecting the nation’s food supply.
The Food Protection Plan is organized by the core elements of prevention, intervention,
and response to food safety problems, with particular emphasis on prevention. The report
describes for each core element the action steps that the agency needs to take and includes
legislative proposals needed to fully implement the plan.2 No time frame for
implementation of the plan is provided in the report.
In July 2007, the President appointed a working group on the safety of imported
products, including food, to conduct a comprehensive review of current import safety
practices and to determine where improvements can be made. This group, headed by
HHS Secretary Leavitt, was formed following the revelations about tainted pet food,
unsafe tires, antibiotics in seafood, and contaminated toothpaste, all originating in China.
Several public meetings and foreign trips were used by the working group to determine
the current situation and develop options for the action plan. The group released its
Strategic Framework to promote import safety to the President on September 10, 2007.3
In November 2007, the working group released its Action Plan, which outlined the
activities to be completed in 200 days.4 The action plan contains a number of actions
specifically to protect the American food supply, which include the setting of safety
standards in the FDA’s Food Protection Plan; certification for the seafood inspection
program and seafood inspectors stationed in Asian countries; establishment of a security
2 The Food Protection Plan is available at [http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/advance/food/
factsheet.html].
3 Interagency Working Group on Import Safety, Protecting Americans Every Step of the Way: A
Strategic Framework for Continual Improvement in Import Safety
, report to the President,
September 10, 2007, available at [http://www.importsafety.gov/report/index.html].
4 Interagency Working Group on Import Safety, The Action Plan for Import Safety: A Road Map
for Continued Improvement
, report to the President, November 2007, available at
[http://www.importsafety.gov].

CRS-6
and prosperity partnership for safe food and other products with Mexico and Canada; a
memoranda of agreement with China on food and animal feed; foreign training on U.S.
safety standards for meat, poultry, and eggs; and a marking requirement on imported food
refused entry into the United States to prevent port-shopping. Other actions are planned
for non-food imported goods.