Order Code RL33770
Department of Homeland Security Grants to State
and Local Governments: FY2003 to FY2006
Updated October 12, 2007
Steven Maguire
Analyst in Public Finance
Government and Finance Division
Shawn Reese
Analyst in American National Government
Government and Finance Division

---

Department of Homeland Security Grants to State and
Local Governments: FY2003 to FY2006
Summary
This report analyzes federal grants to state and local governments that were
administered by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) between FY2003
through FY2006. These grants, which were allocated primarily at the discretion of
DHS, were intended to enhance homeland security.
This report summarizes seven DHS grant programs — the State Homeland
Security Grant Program (SHSGP), the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI), the
Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP), the Emergency
Management Performance Grant Program (EMPG), the Metropolitan Medical
Response System (MMRS), the Citizen Corps Program (CCP), and the Critical
Infrastructure Protection Program (CIP — funded only in FY2003). These seven
DHS programs were chosen for analysis because the allocations were made to state
and local governments, not to private individuals or entities. These seven programs
accounted for $1.85 billion in FY2006.
The report also provides a state-by-state analysis of state and local spending on
public safety more generally. The homeland security grants described in this report
were likely included in the public safety categories of spending as reported by the
states and tabulated by the U.S. Census Bureau. The federal grants identified in this
report were a relatively small portion of overall public safety spending, ranging from
0.48% in Virginia to a maximum of 5.6% in North Dakota.
This report will not be updated.

---

Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
DHS State and Local Assistance Programs: An Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
State Homeland Security Grant Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Urban Area Security Initiative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Critical Infrastructure Protection Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Emergency Management Performance Grant Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Metropolitan Medical Response System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Citizen Corps Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Evolution of Grant Allocation Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Risk and Threat Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Congressional Response to FY2006 Allocations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Federal Goals and State and Local Spending on Homeland Security . . . . . 15
State and Local Spending on Public Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Implications for Homeland Security Grant Program Allocations . . . . 16
Methodological Note . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
List of Tables
Table 1. DHS Homeland Security Grants: Funding for FY2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Table 2. FY2003-FY2006 Homeland Security Grant Allocation Methods . . . . . 12
Table 3. State and Local Spending on Public Safety, Selected Measures . . . . . 18
Table A. State Allocations of Office of Grants and Training Homeland
Security Grants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

---

Department of Homeland Security Grants to
State and Local Governments: FY2003 to
FY2006
Introduction
This report summarizes seven programs that make homeland security grants to
states and selected local governments, and it analyzes the distribution of those grants
from FY2003 through FY2006. The seven grant programs, which are identified
below, were administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and
were designed to help elected state and local general-purpose governments enhance
their homeland security capabilities.
The report does not include all federal assistance programs with homeland
security or public safety components. It does not include such programs as
Community Oriented Policing Services and Justice Assistance Grants.1 Nor does it
include discretionary grants intended for such critical infrastructure sectors as ports,
rail and intercity bus systems, trucking, and buffer zone protection; these grants are
not allocated to elected, general-purpose state and local governments, but to private,
non-governmental, or special-purpose governmental organizations. Finally, the report
does not cover the Firefighter Grant Program because its grants are made not to
general-purpose governments, but directly to individual fire departments, be they
municipal or volunteer, and because the grant allocation method is different.2
The discussion that follows first summarizes the seven programs — their intent,
eligible recipients, and eligible activities — and then reviews the evolution of the
methods DHS has used to allocate funds in those programs. Finally, the report
examines how important the grants were in overall public safety spending by the state
and local governments that receive the grants. The rough estimates resulting from this
CRS analysis suggest that the DHS homeland security grants were relatively small
when compared to the level of recent state public safety expenditures. The ratio of
grant amounts to total state public safety spending averages 1.39%,3 and ranges from
1 Community Oriented Policing Services and Justice Assistance Grants, within the
Department of Justice, provide funding for numerous public safety activities that may not
be considered as part of homeland security.
2 For more on the Firefighter Grant Program, see CRS Report RS21302, Assistance to
Firefighters Program, by Len Kruger. The appropriation for the program for FY2007 was
$662 million. For information on the distribution of grants among the states, see CRS Report
RL32341, Assistance to Firefighters Program: Distribution of Fire Grant Funding, by Len
Kruger.
3 Among the states (i.e., excluding the District of Columbia), the mean is 1.39%; the median
(continued...)

---

CRS-2
approximately 0.5% in Virginia to approximately 5.6% in North Dakota.4 The ratio
is less than 1% in 23 states, less than 2% in 41 states, and less than 3% in 46 states.
DHS State and Local Assistance Programs: An Overview
Before the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the subsequent creation of
DHS, state and local governments were eligible for three grants pertinent to
homeland security: the State Domestic Preparedness Program (SDPP) administered
by the Department of Justice (DOJ) through the Office for Domestic Preparedness
(ODP),5 the Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG) Program
administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the
Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS) administered by the Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS). These three grant programs were subsequently
augmented with the funding of four more homeland security grant programs. The
seven programs are:
! State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP) — formerly
called the State Domestic Preparedness Program (SDPP),6
! Emergency Management Performance Grant Program (EMPG),7
! Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS),8
! Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP),9
! Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI),10
! Critical Infrastructure Protection Program (CIP),11 and
! Citizen Corps Program (CCP).12
3 (...continued)
is 1.0%.
4 The District of Columbia, with grants representing 6.74% of total public safety spending,
is greater than North Dakota, but is a special case because it is not a state and is home to the
federal government.
5 The Office for Domestic Preparedness was transferred to DHS in FY2003 (P.L. 107-296)
and renamed the Office of Grant Programs, within DHS, in FY2007.
6 The State Domestic Preparedness Program was renamed and transferred to DHS in
FY2003 (P.L. 107-296). Funded at the time of transfer through appropriations for FY2003
(P.L. 108-7 and P.L. 108-11).
7 Transferred to DHS in FY2003 (P.L. 107-296). Funded at the time of transfer through
appropriations for FY2003 (P.L. 108-7 and P.L. 108-11).
8 Transferred to DHS in FY2003 (P.L. 107-296).
9 Funded at the time of transfer through DHS appropriations for FY2004 (P.L. 108-90).
10 Funded at the time of transfer through appropriations for FY2003 (P.L. 108-7 and P.L.
108-11).
11 Funded only in FY2003 through appropriations for that year (P.L. 108-7 and P.L. 108-11).
12 Funded at the time of transfer through appropriations for FY2003 (P.L. 108-7 and P.L.
108-11).

---

CRS-3
States; the District of Columbia; U.S. insular areas; and certain high-risk, high-threat
urban areas are eligible for one or more of these programs.13 Funding for the seven
programs for FY2006 is shown in Table 1, below.
Table 1. DHS Homeland Security Grants: Funding for FY200614
FY2006 Funding
DHS Program
Amount
Share of
($millions)
Total
Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI)
$711
38.4%
State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHSGP)
$528
28.5%
Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP)
$384
20.8%
Emergency Management Performance Grant Program (EMPG)
$179
9.7%
Metropolitan Medical Response System (MMRS)
$29
1.6%
Citizen Corps Program (CCP)
$19
1.0%
Critical Infrastructure Protection Program (CIP)
$0
0.0%
Total
$1,850
100.0%
Source: P.L. 109-90 (FY2006 DHS Appropriations).
Funds for five of the seven programs — SHSGP, LETPP, CIP, EMPG, and CCP
— were appropriated and allocated among the states in accord with the provisions
of the USA PATRIOT Act, which said that states are to use the grants
in conjunction with units of local government, to enhance the capability of State
and local jurisdictions to prepare for and respond to terrorist acts including
events of terrorism involving weapons of mass destruction and biological,
nuclear, radiological, incendiary, chemical, and explosive devices.15
The act also said, “Grants under this section may be used to purchase needed
equipment and to provide training and technical assistance to State and local first
responders.”16
The act goes on to authorize appropriations for FY2002 through FY2007 and
set a minimum allocation to states and territories:
Each State shall be allocated in each fiscal year under this section not less than
0.75 percent of the total amount appropriated in the fiscal year for grants
pursuant to this section, except that the United States Virgin Islands, America
13 Only metropolitan medical systems, however, are eligible for MMRS grants.
14 Congress appropriated the FY2007 amounts for these programs in P.L. 109-295, but DHS
has yet to allocate funds to states, urban areas, and U.S. insular areas. When DHS
announces these allocations, this report will be updated.
15 P.L. 107-56, Sec. 1014(a).
16 P.L. 107-56, Sec. 1014 (b).

---

CRS-4
Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands each shall be allocated 0.25
percent.17
The other two programs — UASI and MMRS — provides grants allocated to
certain urban areas and metropolitan medical systems entirely at the discretion of
DHS. The only constraint on departmental administrative discretion was the budget
authority appropriated for the programs for each fiscal year.
Over the years, the DHS method of allocating discretionary grant amounts has
changed. Table 2 traces the grant allocation method for each of the programs for
each fiscal year since FY2003. Table A in the appendix presents the funding for
each program for FY2003 through FY2006, by state. Table A also presents the per
capita amounts for each state and the growth rate over the four-year period. A
description of the programs and their objectives follows below.
Within DHS, the Office of Grant Programs administered these homeland
security assistance grants for state and local governments. The grants helped such
state and local entities as law enforcement agencies, fire departments, emergency
medical services, hospitals, and emergency managers prepare for, prevent, mitigate,
and respond to manmade or natural disasters.
DHS appropriations for FY2007 was passed and signed by the President (P.L.
109-295). For information on FY2007 and FY2008 allocation of federal homeland
security grants, see CRS Report RL34181, Distribution of Homeland Security Grants
in FY2007 and P.L. 110-53, Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission
Act, by Shawn Reese and Steven Maguire.
State Homeland Security Grant Program. ($528 million for FY2006)
SHSGP provides assistance to state and local entities to prepare for terrorist attacks
involving weapons of mass destruction (WMD). It authorizes purchase of
specialized equipment to enhance state and local agencies’ capability in preventing
and responding to WMD incidents and other terrorist incidents, and provides funds
for protecting critical infrastructure of national importance. This program provides
funds for designing, developing, conducting, and evaluating terrorism response
exercises; developing and conducting counter-terrorism training programs; and
updating and implementing each state’s Homeland Security Strategy (SHSS).18
Funds from this program may also be used to plan, design, develop, conduct,
and evaluate exercises that train first responders, and to assess the readiness of state
and local jurisdictions to prevent and respond to terrorist attacks. Exercises must be
threat- and performance-based, in accordance with National Integration Center’s
(within the Federal Emergency Management Agency) Homeland Security Exercise
17 P.L. 107-56, Sec. 1014(c).
18 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Grants and Training, Fiscal Year 2006
Homeland Security Grant Program: Program Guidance and Application Kit (Washington:
2005), p. 2.

---

CRS-5
and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) manuals.19 Allowable training costs include
establishment of new training programs within existing training academies,
universities, and junior colleges.20 In accordance with their approved homeland
security plans, states must allocate 80% of the grant funds to localities. There is no
state or local matching fund requirement for this program.
States are the only authorized applicants, with the following state and local
entities eligible to receive and use funding:
! emergency management agencies or offices,
! homeland security agencies or offices,
! fire departments,
! law enforcement agencies,
! emergency medical services,
! hazardous material-handling personnel,
! public works agencies,
! public health agencies,
! governmental administrative agencies or offices, and
! public safety communication agencies or offices.21
This program represented 28.5% of federal grants to state and local governments
for public safety analyzed here for FY2006.22 Since FY2003, however, SHSGP
allocations have declined 74.4%, due to the reduction in appropriations for the
program. In FY2003, just over $2 billion was distributed, or roughly $7.18 per
capita. In FY2006, the per capita spending was $1.78. The total spending under the
SHSGP over the FY2003 to FY2006 period has been $5.34 billion, or over half of
the total amount provided through these seven grant programs.
Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program. ($384 million for
FY2006) In FY2004 DHS appropriations, Congress directed DHS to establish a local
law enforcement terrorism prevention program for states and localities.23 LETPP
provides funds to support activities to establish and enhance state and local law
enforcement efforts to prevent and respond to terrorist attacks. In accordance with
their approved homeland security plans, states must allocate 80% of the grant funds
to localities.
Authorized program activities include the following:
! information sharing to preempt terrorist attacks,
! target hardening to reduce vulnerability of identified high value
targets,
19 Ibid.
20 Ibid., p. 3.
21 Ibid., p. 2.
22 The percentage is based on the total spending in the seven programs analyzed in this
report.
23 P.L. 108-90, Title III.

---

CRS-6
! recognition of potential or actual threats, and
! interdiction of terrorists and terrorist cells.
Approved costs for the program include, but are not limited to, personnel costs
(overtime as approved by the state administering agency), equipment, computer
systems, and related expenses.24 State and local law enforcement entities are eligible
to receive funding from this program. There is no matching requirement for this
program.
This program represented almost 20.8% of federal assistance to state and local
governments through the programs analyzed here for FY2006. Since FY2004, the
first year of the program, LETPP allocations have declined 23.2%. In FY2004, $500
million was distributed, or roughly $1.72 per capita. In FY2006, the per capita
spending was $1.30. Over the FY2003 to FY2006 window, $1.27 billion has been
allocated through this program.
Urban Area Security Initiative. ($711 million for FY2006) UASI is a
discretionary program that provides funding to high-risk, high-threat urban areas
(including counties and mutual aid partners), to prepare for, prevent, and respond to
terrorist incidents.
The identified high-risk, high-threat urban areas are authorized to use funds to
purchase specialized WMD equipment, plan and execute exercises, pay first
responder overtime costs associated with heightened Homeland Security Advisory
System threat levels, and train first responders. Additionally, funds from this
program can be used for port and mass transit security, radiological defense systems,
pilot projects, and technical assistance.25
The DHS Secretary determines which urban areas are to receive funding, and
the following local entities are eligible to receive funding:
! emergency management agencies or offices,
! homeland security agencies or offices,
! fire departments,
! law enforcement agencies,
! emergency medical services,
! hazardous material-handling personnel,
! public works agencies,
! public health agencies,
! governmental administrative agencies or offices, and
! public safety communication agencies or offices.26
24 S.Rept. 108-86 to accompany P.L. 108-334.
25 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Grants and Training, Fiscal Year 2006
Homeland Security Grant Program: Program Guidance and Application Kit, p. 2.
26 Ibid.

---

CRS-7
In FY2003, the UASI program distributed $596 billion, or $2.07 per capita, to
29 metropolitan areas. Unlike the first two programs, UASI grants increased over
19% from FY2003 to FY2006. Nationally, per capita spending increased to $2.40,
but because more metropolitan areas were included in the eligible list of recipients
in FY2006 (46 metropolitan areas), many individual metropolitan areas actually
realized a decline in per capita allocations. In addition, the FY2006 amount was
roughly $139 million less than the FY2005 allocations. Nevertheless, over the
FY2003 to FY2006 budget window, over $2.8 billion has been distributed through
the UASI program. This amount represents about 27% of the total aid distributed
through these programs.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Program. (Program expired) As part
of the FY2003 SHSGP, funding was provided to pay for costs associated with
increased security measures at critical infrastructure sites during the invasion of Iraq
(March 17, 2003, to April 16, 2003) and future periods of heightened threat. States
and localities were to consider critical infrastructure to include any system or asset
an attack on which would result in catastrophic loss of life or catastrophic economic
loss. States and localities were to consider some of the following types of
infrastructure:
! public water systems,
! data storage and processing facilities,
! chemical facilities,
! major power generation facilities,
! rail and highway bridges,
! natural gas transmission pipelines,
! petroleum handling facilities, and
! mass transit subway systems.27
CIP was funded with a total of $200 million in FY2003. The base amount for
each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico was 0.75%, and U.S. insular
areas received a base of 0.25%. DHS, given the discretion to allocate the remainder,
used the jurisdiction’s portion of the U.S. population as the basis for allocation. The
CIP program was in place for FY2003 only and represented 6.5% of total grants to
state and local governments in that year.
Emergency Management Performance Grant Program. ($179 million
for FY2006) EMPG is designed to assist in the development, maintenance, and
improvement of state and local emergency management capabilities. It provides
support to state and local governments to achieve measurable results in key
functional areas of emergency management.28 The distribution of funds from states
to localities is at the discretion of each state’s EMPG administering agency, typically
27 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office for Domestic Preparedness, Fiscal Year
2003 State Homeland Security Grant Program: Program Guidance and Application Kit,
Part II (Washington: 2003), Annex A.
28 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Grants and Training, Fiscal Year 2006
Homeland Security Grant Program: Program Guidance and Application Kit, p. 2.

---

CRS-8
the state emergency management agency or office. The state matching requirement
for the program is 50%.
EMPG funds are used for emergency management personnel costs, travel,
training, supplies, and other routine expenditures for emergency management
activities. Funds for the program may also be used for consequence management
preparedness projects and programs that develop and improve the capabilities of
states and localities to prepare for, respond to, and recover from terrorist incidents.29
States may use the funds provided through EMPG to structure their individual
emergency management programs based on identified needs and priorities for
strengthening emergency management capabilities. States may also use EMPG funds
to develop intrastate emergency management systems that encourage partnership
building among government, business, and volunteer and community organizations.30
In FY2006, EMPG grants accounted for 9.7% of total DHS grants to state and
local governments, approximately $0.61 per capita. In FY2003, EMPG grants totaled
$165 million, or $0.57 per capita. From FY2003 to FY2006, EMPG grants increased
8.7%, and $692 million has been allocated.
Metropolitan Medical Response System. ($29 million for FY2006) The
MMRS program assists DHS-selected jurisdictions with funding to develop plans
and training, and conduct exercises related to terrorist attacks. Funding is intended
to enhance jurisdictions’ capability in responding to WMD mass casualty events.
Additionally, the program is used to prepare identified jurisdictions for mass casualty
incidents involving hazardous materials, epidemic disease outbreaks, or natural
disasters. The program intends to promote coordination among first responders,
medical treatment resources, public health officials, emergency management offices,
volunteer organizations, and other local entities to reduce the catastrophic effects of
a terrorist attack. Program funding is awarded in three categories:
! Capability Focus: Prepares localities to respond to WMD threats;
! Sustainment Focus: Provides funding for planning, training, and
equipment needed to maintain a locality’s capability to respond to
human health needs in the event of a mass casualty incident; and
! Special Project Focus: Provides funding for innovative solutions to
local issues and publicizes their applicability to localities across the
nation.31
In FY2006, the MMRS allocation was 31.9% less than the allocation in FY2003
of $42.29 million. The FY2006 amount was just 1.6% of the total amount of grants
29 Ibid.
30 Ibid.
31 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
“MMRS Fact Sheet,” available at [http://mmrs.fema.gov/main/events/mmrsfactsheet.aspx].

---

CRS-9
awarded to state and local governments. On a per capita basis, the allocation has
dropped from $0.15 to $0.10.32
Citizen Corps Program. ($19 million for FY2006) On January 29, 2002,
President Bush issued an executive order establishing the USA Freedom Corps.33
The USA Freedom Corps’ mission is to increase opportunities for citizens to
participate in their communities by expanding and enhancing public service. Within
the USA Freedom Corps, the Citizen Corps Program was created to coordinate
volunteer organizations with the mission to make local communities safe and
prepared to respond to any emergency situation. Community Emergency Response
Teams (CERT) is the only program that the Citizen Corps administers that funds
volunteer first responders.34
CERT trains citizens to be prepared to respond to emergency situations in their
own local communities. CERTs are groups of volunteers within communities who
are trained by professional first responders to assist in the event of a manmade or
natural disaster. CERT volunteers give support to first responders, provide
immediate assistance to victims, and organize spontaneous volunteers at a disaster
site. The program authorizes the funding to provide training to CERT volunteers.
This is the smallest of the seven programs analyzed here. In FY2003, $18.8
million was dedicated to the Citizen Corps Program, or approximately 0.6% of all
grants in that year. In FY2006, the Citizen Corps Program was allocated 1.0% of the
total grants awarded, and the FY2006 CCP allocation was 2.2% more than in
FY2003.
Evolution of Grant Allocation Methods
Congress gave DHS a considerable degree of discretion to allocate homeland
security grants among eligible states and urban areas. As noted in Table 2, the only
constraints on that discretion were
! the total amounts appropriated for any given fiscal year;
! instructions in the USA PATRIOT Act setting minimum grant
amounts ( applicable to the SHSGP, LETPP, CIP, EMPG, and CCP
programs); and
! an appropriations act (P.L. 108-334, Title III) instruction for FY2005
directing DHS to allocate the remainder for SHSGP, LETPP,
EMPG, and CCP as it had done in FY2004 (i.e., in direct proportion
to state population).
32 For additional information on the MMRS, see CRS Report RL31719, An Overview of the
U.S. Public Health System in the Context of Emergency Preparedness, by Sarah A. Lister.
33 U.S. President Bush, “Establishing the USA Freedom Corps,” Executive Order 13254,
Federal Register, vol. 67, February 1, 2002, Sec. 1, p. 4869.
34 Besides CERT, the other Citizen Corps Programs include Volunteers in Police Service,
Enhanced Neighborhood Watch, and Medical Response Corps.

---

CRS-10
Within those constraints, the DHS method for allocating SHSGP, LETPP,
EMPG, and CCP funds remaining after state and territorial minimums are met has
evolved to reflect the department’s calculations of risk, need, and the homeland
security capacities of grant recipients. Table 2 traces the annual steps in this
evolution.
In FY2003, the first year of the grant programs, DHS chose to allocate the
remainder for SHSGP, CIP, EMPG, and CCP in proportion to the state’s population.
In FY2004, the department used the same method for all those programs except CIP,
which was not funded after FY2003. In FY2005, the appropriations act for that year
directed DHS once again to allocate the remainder in proportion to population. In
FY2006, however, for SHSGP and LETPP, DHS decided to evaluate and score
homeland security grant applications on the basis of risk and the expected
effectiveness of the applicant’s proposed solutions to identified homeland security
needs. DHS allocated two-thirds of the remainder using its risk and threat
assessments and scoring system. It allocated one-third of the remainder based on
how well the state’s application demonstrated state capacity to effectively use federal
homeland security assistance.
From FY2003 through FY2006, DHS has allocated UASI grants at its own
discretion. From FY2003 through FY2005, the allocations of UASI grants were
based on risk and threat assessments. In FY2006, DHS chose to allocate two-thirds
of each UASI grant based on risk and threat assessments and one-third based on how
well applications demonstrated the ability to effectively use federal homeland
security assistance (see Table 2).
As with grants to states, DHS reasoned that using the effectiveness component
rewards “the significant efforts undertaken by applicants in presenting effective
solutions.”35
Risk and Threat Assessment. According to DHS, the degree of risk were
determined (or measured) using three variables: threat, consequences, and
vulnerability.36 DHS further evaluates the risk associated with specific assets and
geographic attributes using these variables. Shopping malls and airports were
examples of assets, and gross domestic product (GDP) and ratio of law enforcement
to population were examples of geographic attributes. DHS added the score for
asset risk to the score for geographic attribute risk to arrive at total risk. DHS
described the two risk measures as complementary, though asset risk and geographic
attribute risk arguably overlap. For example, the GDP of a location (a “geographic
attribute”) and the number and value of assets are likely highly correlated. Thus,
adding the two risk measures would tend to overvalue total risk.
35 FY2006 HSGP Fact Sheet, Allocation Methodology.
36 Tracy Henke, DHS, Assistant Secretary for Grants and Training, Press Release, May 31,
2006.

---

CRS-11
Congressional Response to FY2006 Allocations
DHS was criticized after the most recent allocation announcement, in part
because most jurisdictions received considerably less than in past years. In addition,
a new factor, effectiveness of proposed spending, was considered in this round
(FY2006) of allocations. Less effective proposals, as determined by a peer review
process, received less than they would have otherwise. What is unclear to many is
whether there exists a risk threshold where effectiveness would be irrelevant. For
example, if a jurisdiction submitted an ineffective plan for protecting a high risk
target, should the federal government fully fund an alternative mitigation strategy
based on peer recommendations?
DHS was also criticized for not providing enough guidance to the state and local
governments applying for grants. For more on DHS’s allocation methods and issues,
see CRS Report RL33583, Homeland Security Grants: FY2003-FY2006 Evolution
of Program Guidance and Grant Allocation Methods, by Shawn Reese.

---

CRS-12
Table 2. FY2003-FY2006 Homeland Security Grant Allocation Methods
Program
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006*
SHSGP
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
1014]
1014]
1014]
1014]
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of total appropriations at
Remainder of total appropriations at
Congress required DHS to
Remainder of total appropriations at
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 108-7,
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 108-90,
allocate the remainder of total
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 109-
P.L. 108-11]
Title III]
appropriations in the same
90, Title III]
manner as in FY2004. [P.L. 108-
334, Title III]
DHS Implementation
DHS Implementation
DHS Implementation
DHS chose to allocate the remainder
DHS chose to allocate the remainder
DHS chose to allocate the
of total SHSGP appropriations in
of total SHSGP appropriations in
remainder of total SHSGP
direct proportion to the state’s
direct proportion to the state’s
appropriations based on risk and the
percentage of the nation’s population.
percentage of the nation’s population.
effectiveness of the state’s proposed
[FY2003 SHSGP Program Guidance
[FY2004 SHSGP Program Guidance
solutions to identified homeland
and Application Kit]
and Application Kit]
security needs. [FY2006 HSGP
Program Guidance and Application
Kit]
LETPP
NA
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
1014]
1014]
1014]
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of total appropriations at
Congress required DHS to
Remainder of total appropriations at
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 108-90,
allocate the remainder of total
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 109-
Title III]
appropriations in the same
90, Title III]
manner as in FY2004. [P.L. 108-
334, Title III]
DHS Implementation
DHS Implementation
DHS chose to allocate the remainder
DHS chose to allocate the
of total LETPP appropriations in direct
remainder of total LETPP
proportion to the state’s percentage of
appropriations based on risk and the
the nation’s population. [FY2004
effectiveness of the state’s proposed
SHSGP Program Guidance and
solution to identified homeland
Application Kit]
security needs. [FY2006 HSGP
Program Guidance and Application
Kit]

---

CRS-13
Program
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006*
UASI
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
NA
NA
NA
NA
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Allocation of total appropriations at
Allocation of total appropriations at
Allocation of total appropriations
Allocation of total appropriations at
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 108-7,
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 108-90,
at the discretion of DHS. [P.L.
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 109-
P.L. 108-11]
Title III]
108-334, Title III]
90, Title III]
DHS Implementation
DHS Implementation
DHS Implementation
DHS Implementation
DHS allocated UASI funds based on
DHS allocated UASI funds based on
DHS allocated UASI funds based
DHS allocated UASI funds based
the following indicators of risk:
the following indicators of risk:
on the following indicators of
on risk and effectiveness of urban
credible threat, presence of critical
credible threat, presence of critical
risk: credible threat, presence of
area’s proposed solutions to
infrastructure, vulnerability,
infrastructure, vulnerability,
critical infrastructure,
identified homeland security needs.
population, population density, law
population, population density, law
vulnerability, population,
[FY2006 HSGP Program Guidance
enforcement investigative and
enforcement investigative and
population density, law
and Application Kit]
enforcement activity, and the existence
enforcement activity, and the existence
enforcement investigative and
of formal mutual aid agreements
of formal mutual aid agreements
enforcement activity, and the
among jurisdictions.[FY2003 UASI
among jurisdictions.[FY2004 UASI
existence of formal mutual aid
Program Guidance and Application
Program Guidance and Application
agreements among
Kit]
Kit]
jurisdictions.[FY2005 UASI
Program Guidance and
Application Kit]
CIP
Guaranteed Amount
NA
NA
NA
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
guaranteed 0.75% of total
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
1014]
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of total appropriations at
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 108-7,
P.L. 108-11]
DHS Implementation
DHS chose to allocate the remainder
of total CIP appropriations in direct
proportion to the state’s percentage of
the nation’s population. [FY2003
SHSGP Program Guidance and
Application Kit]

---

CRS-14
Program
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006*
EMPG
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
1014]
1014]
1014]
1014]
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of total appropriations at
Remainder of total appropriations at
Congress required DHS to
Remainder of total appropriations at
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 108-7,
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 108-90,
allocate the remainder of total
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 109-
P.L. 108-11]
Title III]
appropriations in the same
90, Title III]
manner as in FY2004. [P.L. 108-
334, Title III]
DHS Implementation
DHS Implementation
DHS Implementation
DHS chose to allocate the remainder
DHS chose to allocate the remainder
DHS chose to allocate the
of total EMPG appropriations in direct
of total EMPG appropriations in direct
remainder of total EMPG
proportion to the state’s percentage of
proportion to the state’s percentage of
appropriations in direct proportion
the nation’s population. [FY2003
the nation’s population. [FY2004
to the state’s percentage of the
SHSGP Program Guidance and
SHSGP Program Guidance and
nation’s population. [FY2006
Application Kit]
Application Kit]
HSGP Program Guidance and
Application Kit]
CCP
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
Each state, DC, and Puerto Rico
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
guaranteed 0.75% of total
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
appropriations. [P.L. 107-56, Sec.
1014]
1014]
1014]
1014]
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of Appropriations
Remainder of total appropriations at
Remainder of total appropriations at
Congress required DHS to
Remainder of total appropriations at
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 108-7,
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 108-90,
allocate the remainder of total
the discretion of DHS. [P.L. 109-
P.L. 108-11]
Title III]
appropriations in the same
90, Title III]
manner as in FY2004. [P.L. 108-
334, Title III]
DHS Implementation
DHS Implementation
DHS Implementation
DHS chose to allocate the remainder
DHS chose to allocate the remainder
DHS chose to allocate the
of total CCP appropriations in direct
of total CCP appropriations in direct
remainder of total CCP
proportion to the state’s percentage of
proportion to the state’s percentage of
appropriations in direct proportion
the nation’s population. [FY2003
the nation’s population. [FY2004
to the state’s percentage of the
SHSGP Program Guidance and
SHSGP Program Guidance and
nation’s population. [FY2006
Application Kit]
Application Kit]
HSGP Program Guidance and
Application Kit]
MMRS
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
Guaranteed Amount
DHS determines what metropolitan
DHS determines what metropolitan
DHS determines what
DHS determines what metropolitan
medical systems receive funding and
medical systems receive funding and
metropolitan medical systems
medical systems receive funding
amount. [P.L. 108-7 and P.L. 108-11]
amount. [P.L. 108-90, Title III]
receive funding and amount.
and amount. [P.L. 109-90, Title III]
[P.L. 108-334, Title III]
*In the FY2007 DHS appropriations act (P.L. 109-295), Congress does not alter the funding methods for these grant programs. DHS has yet to
announce the allocation of FY2007 discretionary funds.

---

CRS-15
Federal Goals and State and Local Spending
on Homeland Security
Domestic public safety has traditionally been the responsibility of state and local
governments; and within each state, spending that generates the greatest benefit for
the state is a state priority. For the federal government, however, spending that
generates the greatest benefit for the nation is a priority; and the federal government’s
priorities for additional spending do not always align with state objectives. Under
the rubric of homeland security following the attacks of September 11, 2001, the
federal government increased its role in public safety. The various grants to state and
local governments, including the seven programs that are examined in this report and
that are now primarily administered by DHS, are manifestations of an elevated
federal role.
After the attacks of 9/11, a homeland security presidential directive (HSPD-8)
identified the need to implement a “national preparedness goal” that would
establish policies to strengthen the preparedness of the United States to prevent
and respond to threatened or actual domestic terrorist attacks, major disasters,
and other emergencies by requiring a national domestic all-hazards preparedness
goal, establishing mechanisms for improved delivery of Federal preparedness
assistance to State and local governments, and outlining actions to strengthen
preparedness capabilities of Federal, State, and local entities.37
The definition for “Federal preparedness assistance” in HSPD-8 did suggest the
notion that the federal aid is intended for preparedness spending whose benefit would
be national in scope. The definition, however, was somewhat ambiguous because the
catchall phrase “other emergencies” was included in it. Specifically, according to
HSPD-8, federal preparedness assistance to state and local governments is intended
“to prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from terrorist attacks, major
disasters, and other emergencies” [emphasis added]. Throughout HSPD-8, preparing
for and responding to terrorist attacks is the primary concern. Since HSPD-8 was
promulgated, DHS has issued several drafts of the National Preparedness Goal.
Throughout those drafts, government spending that enhances national preparedness
has remained a guiding principle.38
In the American federal system, a variety of police, public health, emergency
management, and other functions pertinent to homeland security are performed by
state and local governments. Thus, to assess the importance of the seven federal
homeland security grants relative to total public safety spending by state and local
37 On December 17, 2003, the President issued Homeland Security Presidential Directive 8,
National Preparedness (HSPD-8).
38 For more information on the national preparedness goal as related to federal homeland
security grants to states and selected urban areas, see CRS Report RL33583, Homeland
Security Grants: Evolution of Program Guidance and Grant Allocation Methods, by Shawn
Reese.

---

CRS-16
grant recipients, we must measure how much state and local governments spend on
public safety and how expenditures vary among states.39
State and Local Spending on Public Safety. Generally, spending on
public safety is a strong indicator of a jurisdiction’s provision of this government
service.40 The level of state and local spending on public safety varies considerably
by state and could serve as a rough approximation of existing government supply
(and thus public demand) for this service in the respective states. For example, in
FY2004, total state and local spending on public safety in California was 1.86% of
California’s gross domestic product (GDP). In contrast, South Dakota dedicated
0.83% of its GDP to public safety spending (see Table 3, column 4).
Another means of measuring a state’s provision of public safety is the spending
on public safety relative to a national mean. In the United States, 1.39% of total U.S.
GDP is devoted to public safety spending. Thus, if all states were equally invested
in public safety, 1.39% of each state’s GDP would be spent on fire, police,
corrections, and protective inspections activities. Multiplying this percentage by
GDP yields what a state would spend on public safety if it were spending the national
average (or “par” value). If actual spending exceeds the estimated par value, then the
state demands (and provides) relatively more public safety spending. Conversely, if
a state is below the national average, then the citizens demand less public safety
spending.
Using this method, each state can be scored in relation to par (see Table 3,
column 5). Again, states over par spend relatively more on public safety, and those
that are under par spend relatively less. Table 3 presents the par calculation for
each state based on FY2004 data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau. The top three
states in relation to par are Florida (26.3% over par), California (25.3%), and Arizona
(19.1%). The bottom three states are South Dakota (-67.2%), North Dakota
(-63.5%), and New Hampshire (-51.7%).
Implications for Homeland Security Grant Program Allocations. One
perspective on public safety spending is that it reflects the needs, not necessarily the
desires, of state and local governments. For example, of the top 10 states in public
safety spending as a share of state GDP, all but Nevada are international border
states, have extensive coastline, or both (see Table 3). One could argue that the
national benefit from state and local spending on border control and monitoring is
readily apparent. State and local public safety spending for the protection of critical
infrastructure also generates a national benefit. These assets include, but are not
limited to seaports, chemical facilities, federal facilities, dams, public utilities, oil and
natural gas refineries and pipelines, financial centers, and transportation assets.
Federal grants could be relatively larger for those states that spend more on activities
39 DHS allocates grants to states and urban areas based on risk and other factors; but, as far
as CRS can determine, the department does not explicitly consider current state and local
spending on public safety.
40 Another measure might be the actual output, like the number of police officers or fire
houses. Still other measures might be the reduction in crime rates, or the number of crimes
solved as a portion of total crimes committed.

---

CRS-17
that generate a measurable national benefit. The unpredictable nature of terrorism
and terrorists’ selection of targets, however, could lend credibility to the argument
that states and localities without international borders or large concentrations of
critical infrastructure assets may still need some level of federal homeland security
assistance to ensure their preparedness and protection.
The extent to which the objectives behind the federal grant programs correspond
with current state and local public safety spending objectives is critical. The
additional federal funds for public safety spending will initially augment existing
spending, but over time could begin to substitute for state and local own-source
spending. This outcome would mean that the federal tax system, primarily federal
income taxes, would substitute for state and local tax systems, typically property and
sales taxes. The shift, however, would be relatively small, given that FY2006 public
safety grants were about 1% of total state and local public safety spending in FY2004
(the latest available year for state and local public safety spending data).
Methodological Note. Data limitations are important to consider while
reviewing the data presented in Table 3. First, Table 3 reports data on Gross
Domestic Product by state for the 2004 calendar year. More recent estimates are
available, but the most recent state and local finance data are for FY2004. For most
states, FY2004 ended on or near June 30, 2004. Thus, data on GDP by state for 2004
are the most appropriate to use for standardized comparison of states. Second, the
last column in Table 3 reports the FY2006 federal grants to states as shares of
FY2004 state and local public safety spending. Ideally, data for state and local
spending on public safety for FY2006 would be available, though the FY2004 data
do allow for relatively robust comparisons among states. If FY2006 data were
available, they would likely show that the FY2006 federal grants as shares of state
and local public safety spending are less than reported in Table 3. The federal grants
have declined, whereas state and local public safety spending has likely remained
constant or increased in absolute terms since 2004.

---

CRS-18
Table 3. State and Local Spending on Public Safety, Selected Measures
Total S&L
S&L Public
2004 State Gross
Over/Under
Over/Under as
Total DHS Grants, FY2006
Public Safety
Safety
Domestic Product
Amount Relative
Percentage
State
Expenditures
Spending as
(GDP)
to National
of S&L
Share of S&L
FY2004
Share of State
(millions)
Average
Spending
Amount
Public Safety
(thousands)
GDP
Expenditures
Alabama
$1,764,422
$141,366
1.25%
($197,603)
-11.2%
$15,578,025
0.9%
Alaska
$490,536
$35,988
1.36%
($8,943)
-1.8%
$8,294,137
1.7%
Arizona
$3,333,580
$194,246
1.72%
$637,632
19.1%
$20,170,965
0.6%
Arkansas
$1,136,281
$82,712
1.37%
($11,682)
-1.0%
$8,342,875
0.7%
California
$28,208,145
$1,519,202
1.86%
$7,123,076
25.3%
$231,950,605
0.8%
Colorado
$2,561,220
$201,392
1.27%
($233,908)
-9.1%
$21,079,809
0.8%
Connecticut
$1,905,816
$182,468
1.04%
($626,665)
-32.9%
$13,520,893
0.7%
Delaware
$484,160
$52,298
0.93%
($241,686)
-49.9%
$10,296,370
2.1%
D.C.
$801,682
$77,510
1.03%
($274,083)
-34.2%
$54,015,142
6.7%
Florida
$11,470,989
$609,372
1.88%
$3,013,489
26.3%
$100,122,080
0.9%
Georgia
$4,426,127
$339,730
1.30%
($289,000)
-6.5%
$44,406,375
1.0%
Hawaii
$572,420
$50,238
1.14%
($124,835)
-21.8%
$12,935,242
2.3%
Idaho
$640,210
$43,509
1.47%
$36,347
5.7%
$11,758,809
1.8%
Illinois
$7,064,410
$533,735
1.32%
($343,321)
-4.9%
$90,405,480
1.3%
Indiana
$2,417,932
$229,449
1.05%
($766,600)
-31.7%
$21,129,053
0.9%
Iowa
$1,019,956
$110,210
0.93%
($509,653)
-50.0%
$13,480,048
1.3%
Kansas
$1,230,507
$98,927
1.24%
($142,505)
-11.6%
$14,273,884
1.2%
Kentucky
$1,624,188
$133,003
1.22%
($221,766)
-13.7%
$24,118,634
1.5%
Louisiana
$2,356,127
$160,186
1.47%
$132,899
5.6%
$30,436,715
1.3%

---

CRS-19
Total S&L
S&L Public
2004 State Gross
Over/Under
Over/Under as
Total DHS Grants, FY2006
Public Safety
Safety
Domestic Product
Amount Relative
Percentage
State
Expenditures
Spending as
(GDP)
to National
of S&L
Share of S&L
FY2004
Share of State
(millions)
Average
Spending
Amount
Public Safety
(thousands)
GDP
Expenditures
Maine
$517,738
$43,258
1.20%
($82,642)
-16.0%
$7,784,686
1.5%
Maryland
$3,503,625
$230,698
1.52%
$301,758
8.6%
$24,290,987
0.7%
Massachusetts
$3,533,282
$312,700
1.13%
($806,695)
-22.8%
$41,246,241
1.2%
Michigan
$5,467,987
$366,601
1.49%
$379,916
6.9%
$46,898,876
0.9%
Minnesota
$2,345,018
$224,620
1.04%
($772,493)
-32.9%
$13,395,399
0.6%
Mississippi
$1,128,986
$77,107
1.46%
$58,815
5.2%
$8,528,314
0.8%
Missouri
$2,419,289
$205,847
1.18%
($437,670)
-18.1%
$42,860,979
1.8%
Montana
$356,288
$27,583
1.29%
($26,538)
-7.4%
$7,929,901
2.2%
Nebraska
$711,620
$67,989
1.05%
($232,002)
-32.6%
$21,746,103
3.1%
Nevada
$1,612,240
$99,143
1.63%
$236,230
14.7%
$20,508,913
1.3%
New Hampshire
$476,545
$52,084
0.92%
($246,331)
-51.7%
$7,886,573
1.7%
New Jersey
$5,181,668
$410,306
1.26%
($512,986)
-9.9%
$51,982,785
1.0%
New Mexico
$990,473
$63,645
1.56%
$107,141
10.8%
$8,270,273
0.8%
New York
$14,557,355
$906,783
1.61%
$1,972,075
13.5%
$183,673,552
1.3%
North Carolina
$3,457,217
$323,962
1.07%
($1,039,065)
-30.1%
$30,483,786
0.9%
North Dakota
$192,622
$22,692
0.85%
($122,321)
-63.5%
$10,788,443
5.6%
Ohio
$5,710,111
$425,173
1.34%
($190,883)
-3.3%
$41,347,339
0.7%
Oklahoma
$1,504,172
$111,838
1.35%
($48,032)
-3.2%
$19,496,662
1.3%
Oregon
$2,173,637
$134,615
1.61%
$305,310
14.0%
$17,955,904
0.8%
Pennsylvania
$5,591,577
$463,752
1.21%
($844,857)
-15.1%
$49,335,020
0.9%
Rhode Island
$669,989
$41,844
1.60%
$89,234
13.3%
$7,837,616
1.2%

---

CRS-20
Total S&L
S&L Public
2004 State Gross
Over/Under
Over/Under as
Total DHS Grants, FY2006
Public Safety
Safety
Domestic Product
Amount Relative
Percentage
State
Expenditures
Spending as
(GDP)
to National
of S&L
Share of S&L
FY2004
Share of State
(millions)
Average
Spending
Amount
Public Safety
(thousands)
GDP
Expenditures
South Carolina
$1,601,653
$131,492
1.22%
($223,330)
-13.9%
$14,679,434
0.9%
South Dakota
$246,481
$29,699
0.83%
($165,713)
-67.2%
$7,733,780
3.1%
Tennessee
$2,197,748
$216,769
1.01%
($810,798)
-36.9%
$13,761,872
0.6%
Texas
$10,088,160
$903,208
1.12%
($2,447,502)
-24.3%
$89,880,352
0.9%
Utah
$1,025,243
$82,546
1.24%
($120,416)
-11.7%
$8,271,012
0.8%
Vermont
$228,978
$21,992
1.04%
($76,250)
-33.3%
$10,907,921
4.8%
Virginia
$3,555,043
$327,032
1.09%
($983,848)
-27.7%
$16,888,018
0.5%
Washington
$3,316,389
$253,085
1.31%
($196,188)
-5.9%
$32,221,988
1.0%
West Virginia
$498,085
$49,903
1.00%
($194,521)
-39.1%
$13,293,669
2.7%
Wisconsin
$3,107,195
$207,739
1.50%
$223,977
7.2%
$24,430,858
0.8%
Wyoming
$289,768
$24,092
1.20%
($44,606)
-15.4%
$7,673,562
2.6%
United States
$161,764,890
$11,655,338
1.39%
na
na
$1,650,307,965
1.0%

---

CRS-21
Appendix
Table A. State Allocations of Office of Grants and Training
Homeland Security Grants
(all amounts in millions except dollar per capita figures)
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Alabama
Population**
4,480,139
4,501,862
4,525,375
4,557,808
1.7%
SHSGP
$88.64
$34.51
$28.14
$17.69
$8.30
-75.9%
$7.70
$6.25
$3.91
$1.82
-76.4%
LETPP
$20.81
na
$8.35
$6.43
$6.03
-27.8%
$0.00
$1.85
$1.42
$1.32
-28.7%
EMPG
$11.53
$2.75
$2.89
$2.90
$2.99
8.7%
$0.61
$0.64
$0.64
$0.66
6.9%
MMRS
$4.76
$1.32
$1.60
$0.91
$0.93
-29.5%
$0.29
$0.36
$0.20
$0.20
-30.7%
CCPa
$1.43
$0.31
$0.58
$0.22
$0.32
3.2%
$0.07
$0.13
$0.05
$0.07
1.5%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$3.34
$3.34
na
na
na
na
$0.75
na
na
na
na
Total
$130.51
$42.23
$41.56
$28.15
$18.57
-56.0%
$9.43
$9.23
$6.22
$4.07
-56.8%
Alaska
Population**
640,699
648,510
657,755
663,661
3.6%
SHSGP
$45.12
$16.46
$14.86
$9.37
$4.43
-73.1%
$25.69
$22.92
$14.24
$6.68
-74.0%

---

CRS-22
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
LETPP
$11.05
na
$4.41
$3.41
$3.23
-26.8%
$0.00
$6.80
$5.18
$4.87
-28.4%
EMPG
$6.09
$1.45
$1.53
$1.53
$1.58
8.6%
$2.27
$2.36
$2.33
$2.38
4.8%
MMRS
$1.80
$0.88
$0.00
$0.46
$0.46
-47.2%
$1.37
$0.00
$0.69
$0.70
-49.0%
CCP
$0.76
$0.17
$0.31
$0.12
$0.17
2.2%
$0.26
$0.48
$0.18
$0.26
-1.3%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$1.76
$1.76
na
na
na
na
$2.75
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$66.59
$20.73
$21.11
$14.88
$9.87
-52.4%
$32.35
$32.55
$22.62
$14.88
-54.0%
Arizona
Population**
5,438,159
5,577,784
5,739,879
5,939,292
9.2%
SHSGP
$95.05
$34.88
$31.49
$20.02
$8.66
-75.2%
$6.41
$5.65
$3.49
$1.46
-77.3%
LETPP
$22.91
na
$9.34
$7.28
$6.29
-32.7%
$0.00
$1.68
$1.27
$1.06
-36.8%
EMPG
$12.90
$3.08
$3.24
$3.24
$3.35
8.8%
$0.57
$0.58
$0.56
$0.56
-0.4%
MMRS
$4.81
$1.12
$1.85
$0.91
$0.93
-17.0%
$0.21
$0.33
$0.16
$0.16
-24.0%
CCP
$1.63
$0.35
$0.65
$0.25
$0.37
5.8%
$0.06
$0.12
$0.04
$0.06
-3.1%
UASI
Phoenix
$37.15
$11.03
$12.20
$10.00
$3.92
-64.5%
$2.03
$2.19
$1.74
$0.66
-67.5%
CIP
$3.74
$3.74
na
na
na
na
$0.69
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$178.19
$54.20
$58.77
$41.70
$23.52
-56.6%
$9.97
$10.54
$7.27
$3.96
-60.3%

---

CRS-23
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Arkansas
Population**
2,706,606
2,726,166
2,750,000
2,779,154
2.7%
SHSGP
$67.38
$26.98
$22.00
$13.85
$4.55
-83.1%
$9.97
$8.07
$5.04
$1.64
-83.6%
LETPP
$14.88
na
$6.53
$5.04
$3.31
-49.3%
$0.00
$2.39
$1.83
$1.19
-50.3%
EMPG
$9.02
$2.15
$2.26
$2.26
$2.34
8.6%
$0.80
$0.83
$0.82
$0.84
5.8%
MMRS
$0.74
$0.28
$0.00
$0.23
$0.23
-17.0%
$0.10
$0.00
$0.08
$0.08
-19.2%
CCP
$1.13
$0.25
$0.46
$0.18
$0.25
2.1%
$0.09
$0.17
$0.06
$0.09
-0.6%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.61
$2.61
na
na
na
na
$0.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$95.76
$32.27
$31.25
$21.56
$10.68
-66.9%
$11.92
$11.46
$7.84
$3.84
-67.8%
California
Population**
34,988,088
35,456,602
35,842,038
36,132,147
3.3%
SHSGP
$430.44
$164.28
$133.96
$84.61
$47.58
-71.0%
$4.70
$3.78
$2.36
$1.32
-72.0%
LETPP
$112.89
na
$39.75
$30.77
$42.37
6.6%
$0.00
$1.12
$0.86
$1.17
4.6%
EMPG
$54.89
$13.09
$13.77
$13.79
$14.24
8.7%
$0.37
$0.39
$0.38
$0.39
5.3%
MMRS
$21.17
$6.04
$6.85
$4.10
$4.18
-30.8%
$0.17
$0.19
$0.11
$0.12
-33.0%
CCP
$6.88
$1.49
$2.78
$1.07
$1.53
2.3%
$0.04
$0.08
$0.03
$0.04
-1.0%
UASI
Anaheim
$57.21
$0.00
$25.40
$19.83
$11.98
-52.8%
$0.00
$0.72
$0.55
$0.33
-53.7%
Bay Area
$134.80
$28.94
$44.32
$33.23
$28.32
-2.1%
$0.83
$1.25
$0.93
$0.78
-5.2%
Fresno
$7.08
$0.00
$7.08
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.20
$0.00
$0.00
na

---

CRS-24
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Los Angeles
$228.02
$37.76
$40.40
$69.24
$80.61
113.5%
$1.08
$1.14
$1.93
$2.23
106.7%
Sacramento
$28.41
$6.91
$8.02
$6.09
$7.39
6.9%
$0.20
$0.23
$0.17
$0.20
3.5%
San Diego
$44.61
$11.36
$10.48
$14.78
$7.99
-29.7%
$0.32
$0.30
$0.41
$0.22
-31.9%
CIP
$15.90
$15.90
na
na
na
na
$0.45
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$1,142.30
$285.78
$332.83
$277.50
$246.19
-13.9%
$8.17
$9.39
$7.74
$6.81
-16.6%
Colorado
Population**
4,498,407
4,548,071
4,601,821
4,665,177
3.7%
SHSGP
$88.68
$34.59
$28.21
$17.80
$8.08
-76.64%
$7.69
$6.20
$3.87
$1.73
-77.5%
LETPP
$22.44
na
$8.37
$6.47
$7.60
-9.20%
$0.00
$1.84
$1.41
$1.63
-11.5%
EMPG
$11.56
$2.76
$2.90
$2.90
$3.00
8.61%
$0.61
$0.64
$0.63
$0.64
4.7%
MMRS
$3.42
$0.84
$1.20
$0.68
$0.70
-16.67%
$0.19
$0.26
$0.15
$0.15
-19.6%
CCP
$1.45
$0.31
$0.59
$0.23
$0.32
3.23%
$0.07
$0.13
$0.05
$0.07
-0.5%
UASI
Denver
$37.32
$15.57
$8.65
$8.72
$4.38
-71.87%
$3.46
$1.90
$1.89
$0.94
-72.9%
CIP
$0.00
na
na
na
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$164.87
$54.07
$49.92
$36.80
$24.08
-55.47%
$12.02
$10.98
$8.00
$5.16
-57.1%
Connecticut
Population**
3,458,382
3,485,881
3,498,966
3,510,297
1.5%
SHSGP
$81.40
$30.16
$24.59
$15.49
$11.16
-63.0%
$8.72
$7.05
$4.43
$3.18
-63.5%
LETPP
$14.78
na
$7.30
$5.63
$1.85
-74.7%
$0.00
$2.09
$1.61
$0.53
-74.8%
EMPG
$10.08
$2.41
$2.53
$2.53
$2.61
8.4%
$0.70
$0.73
$0.72
$0.74
6.8%
MMRS
$1.34
$0.48
$0.40
$0.23
$0.23
-52.1%
$0.14
$0.11
$0.07
$0.07
-52.8%

---

CRS-25
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
CCP
$1.26
$0.27
$0.51
$0.20
$0.28
3.7%
$0.08
$0.15
$0.06
$0.08
2.2%
UASI
$9.63
$0.00
$9.63
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$2.76
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.92
$2.92
na
na
na
na
$0.84
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$121.41
$36.24
$44.96
$24.08
$16.13
-55.5%
$10.48
$12.90
$6.88
$4.60
-56.1%
Delaware
Population**
805,767
817,827
830,069
843,524
4.7%
SHSGP
$50.15
$18.92
$15.43
$9.73
$6.07
-67.9%
$23.48
$18.87
$11.72
$7.20
-69.4%
LETPP
$12.17
na
$4.58
$3.54
$4.05
-11.6%
$0.00
$5.60
$4.26
$4.80
-14.3%
EMPG
$6.33
$1.51
$1.59
$1.59
$1.64
8.6%
$1.87
$1.94
$1.92
$1.94
3.7%
MMRS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$0.79
$0.17
$0.32
$0.12
$0.18
5.9%
$0.21
$0.39
$0.14
$0.21
1.1%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$1.83
$1.83
na
na
na
na
$2.27
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$71.27
$22.43
$21.92
$14.98
$11.94
-46.8%
$27.84
$26.80
$18.05
$14.15
-49.2%
D.C.
Population**
564,624
557,846
554,239
550,521
-2.5%
SHSGP
$45.98
$17.92
$14.61
$9.18
$4.27
-76.2%
$31.74
$26.19
$16.56
$7.76
-75.6%
LETPP
$10.79
na
$4.34
$3.34
$3.11
-28.3%
$0.00
$7.78
$6.03
$5.65
-27.4%
EMPG
$5.98
$1.43
$1.50
$1.50
$1.55
8.6%
$2.53
$2.69
$2.71
$2.82
11.3%

---

CRS-26
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
MMRS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$0.75
$0.16
$0.30
$0.12
$0.17
6.3%
$0.28
$0.54
$0.22
$0.31
9.0%
UASI
N.C.R.b
$218.26
$60.49
$29.30
$82.00
$46.47
-23.2%
$107.13
$52.52
$147.95
$84.41
-21.2%
CIP
$1.73
$1.73
na
na
na
na
$3.06
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$283.49
$81.73
$50.05
$96.14
$55.57
-32.0%
$144.75
$89.72
$173.46
$100.95
-30.3%
Florida
Population**
16,677,860
16,993,369
17,385,430
17,789,864
6.7%
SHSGP
$227.01
$86.31
$70.38
$44.73
$25.59
-70.4%
$19.27
$15.63
$9.88
$5.61
-70.9%
LETPP
$55.76
na
$20.89
$16.26
$18.61
-10.9%
na
$4.64
$3.59
$4.08
-12.0%
EMPG
$28.82
$6.87
$7.23
$7.24
$7.48
8.9%
$1.53
$1.61
$1.60
$1.64
7.0%
MMRS
$7.97
$2.36
$2.39
$1.59
$1.63
-30.9%
$0.53
$0.53
$0.35
$0.36
-32.1%
CCP
$3.65
$0.79
$1.46
$0.57
$0.83
5.1%
$0.18
$0.32
$0.13
$0.18
3.3%
UASI
Ft. Lauderdale
$9.98
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$9.98
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.56
na
Jacksonville
$16.15
$0.00
$0.00
$6.88
$9.27
34.7%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.40
$0.52
31.7%
Miami
$64.14
$13.18
$19.15
$15.83
$15.98
21.2%
$0.79
$1.13
$0.91
$0.90
13.7%
Orlando
$18.21
$0.00
$8.77
$0.00
$9.44
7.6%
$0.00
$0.52
$0.00
$0.53
2.8%
Tampa
$31.62
$5.77
$9.28
$7.77
$8.80
52.5%
$0.35
$0.55
$0.45
$0.49
43.0%
CIP
$8.35
$8.35
na
na
na
na
$0.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$471.66
$123.63
$139.55
$100.87
$107.61
-13.0%
$7.41
$8.21
$5.80
$6.05
-18.4%

---

CRS-27
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Georgia
Population**
8,581,731
8,746,849
8,918,129
9,072,576
5.7%
SHSGP
$134.07
$51.77
$42.21
$26.73
$13.36
-74.2%
$6.03
$4.83
$3.00
$1.47
-75.6%
LETPP
$33.68
na
$12.53
$9.72
$11.43
-8.8%
$0.00
$1.43
$1.09
$1.26
-12.1%
EMPG
$17.30
$4.12
$4.34
$4.35
$4.49
8.9%
$0.48
$0.50
$0.49
$0.49
3.0%
MMRS
$2.02
$0.60
$0.50
$0.46
$0.46
-23.3%
$0.07
$0.06
$0.05
$0.05
-27.5%
CCP
$2.18
$0.47
$0.88
$0.34
$0.49
4.3%
$0.05
$0.10
$0.04
$0.05
-1.4%
UASI
Atlanta
$42.73
$0.00
$10.74
$13.33
$18.66
73.7%
$0.00
$1.23
$1.49
$2.06
67.5%
CIP
$5.01
$5.01
na
na
na
na
$0.58
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$236.99
$61.97
$71.20
$54.93
$48.89
-21.1%
$7.22
$8.14
$6.16
$5.39
-25.4%
Hawaii
Population**
1,234,401
1,248,200
1,262,124
1,275,194
3.3%
SHSGP
$52.88
$20.77
$16.94
$10.68
$4.49
-78.4%
$16.83
$13.57
$8.46
$3.52
-79.1%
LETPP
$12.17
na
$5.03
$3.88
$3.26
-35.2%
$0.00
$4.03
$3.07
$2.56
-36.6%
EMPG
$6.94
$1.66
$1.74
$1.74
$1.80
8.4%
$1.34
$1.39
$1.38
$1.41
5.0%
MMRS
$1.14
$0.28
$0.40
$0.23
$0.23
-17.9%
$0.23
$0.32
$0.18
$0.18
-20.5%

---

CRS-28
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
CCP
$0.87
$0.19
$0.35
$0.14
$0.19
0.0%
$0.15
$0.28
$0.11
$0.15
-3.2%
UASI
Honolulu
$18.08
$6.87
$0.00
$6.45
$4.76
-30.7%
$5.57
$0.00
$5.11
$3.73
-32.9%
CIP
$2.01
$2.01
na
na
na
na
$1.63
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$94.09
$31.78
$24.46
$23.12
$14.73
-53.7%
$25.75
$19.60
$18.32
$11.55
-55.1%
Idaho
Population**
1,343,973
1,368,111
1,395,140
1,429,096
6.3%
SHSGP
$56.06
$21.18
$17.27
$10.92
$6.69
-68.4%
$15.76
$12.62
$7.83
$4.68
-70.3%
LETPP
$13.97
na
$5.13
$3.97
$4.87
-5.1%
$0.00
$3.75
$2.85
$3.41
-9.1%
EMPG
$7.09
$1.69
$1.78
$1.78
$1.84
8.6%
$1.26
$1.30
$1.28
$1.28
2.1%
MMRS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$0.89
$0.19
$0.36
$0.14
$0.20
5.3%
$0.14
$0.26
$0.10
$0.14
-1.0%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.05
$2.05
na
na
na
na
$1.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$80.06
$25.11
$24.54
$16.81
$13.60
-45.9%
$18.68
$17.94
$12.05
$9.51
-49.1%

---

CRS-29
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Illinois
Population**
12,586,839
12,649,940
12,712,016
12,763,371
1.4%
SHSGP
$179.43
$68.88
$56.17
$35.30
$19.08
-72.3%
$5.47
$4.44
$2.78
$1.49
-72.7%
LETPP
$47.71
na
$16.67
$12.84
$18.20
9.2%
$0.00
$1.32
$1.01
$1.43
8.2%
EMPG
$23.00
$5.48
$5.77
$5.78
$5.97
8.9%
$0.44
$0.46
$0.45
$0.47
7.4%
MMRS
$1.14
$0.28
$0.40
$0.23
$0.23
-17.9%
$0.02
$0.03
$0.02
$0.02
-19.0%
CCP
$2.88
$0.63
$1.17
$0.45
$0.63
0.0%
$0.05
$0.09
$0.04
$0.05
-1.4%
UASI
Chicago
$175.27
$40.87
$34.14
$48.00
$52.26
27.9%
$3.25
$2.70
$3.78
$4.09
26.1%
CIP
$6.67
$6.67
na
na
na
na
$0.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$436.10
$122.81
$114.32
$102.60
$96.37
-21.5%
$9.76
$9.04
$8.07
$7.55
-22.6%
Indiana
Population**
6,154,739
6,196,269
6,226,537
6,271,973
1.9%
SHSGP
$107.68
$41.59
$33.92
$21.35
$10.82
-74.0%
$6.76
$5.47
$3.43
$1.73
-74.5%
LETPP
$22.92
na
$10.07
$7.76
$5.09
-49.5%
$0.00
$1.63
$1.25
$0.81
-50.1%
EMPG
$13.89
$3.31
$3.49
$3.49
$3.60
8.9%
$0.54
$0.56
$0.56
$0.57
6.9%
MMRS
$2.48
$0.76
$0.80
$0.46
$0.46
-39.5%
$0.12
$0.13
$0.07
$0.07
-40.6%

---

CRS-30
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
CCP
$1.73
$0.38
$0.70
$0.27
$0.38
0.0%
$0.06
$0.11
$0.04
$0.06
-1.9%
UASI
Indianapolis
$20.18
$0.00
$10.15
$5.66
$4.37
-56.9%
$0.00
$1.64
$0.91
$0.70
-57.5%
CIP
$4.03
$4.03
na
na
na
na
$0.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$106.82
$50.07
$25.21
$17.64
$13.90
-72.2%
$8.14
$4.07
$2.83
$2.22
-72.7%
Iowa
Population**
2,934,340
2,941,362
2,952,904
2,966,334
1.1%
SHSGP
$72.57
$27.94
$22.78
$14.33
$7.52
-73.1%
$9.52
$7.74
$4.85
$2.54
-73.4%
LETPP
$17.44
na
$6.76
$5.21
$5.47
-19.1%
$0.00
$2.30
$1.76
$1.84
-19.8%
EMPG
$9.34
$2.23
$2.34
$2.35
$2.42
8.6%
$0.76
$0.80
$0.80
$0.82
7.4%
MMRS
$0.74
$0.28
$0.00
$0.23
$0.23
-17.9%
$0.10
$0.00
$0.08
$0.08
-18.7%
CCP
$1.16
$0.25
$0.47
$0.18
$0.26
4.0%
$0.09
$0.16
$0.06
$0.09
2.9%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.70
$2.70
na
na
na
na
$0.92
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$103.95
$33.40
$32.35
$22.30
$15.90
-52.4%
$11.38
$11.00
$7.55
$5.36
-52.9%

---

CRS-31
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Kansas
Population**
2,712,454
2,724,224
2,733,697
2,744,687
1.2%
SHSGP
$70.72
$27.00
$22.02
$13.85
$7.85
-70.9%
$9.95
$8.08
$5.07
$2.86
-71.3%
LETPP
$17.28
na
$6.53
$5.04
$5.71
-12.6%
$0.00
$2.40
$1.84
$2.08
-13.2%
EMPG
$9.02
$2.15
$2.26
$2.27
$2.34
8.8%
$0.79
$0.83
$0.83
$0.85
7.6%
MMRS
$2.36
$0.76
$0.68
$0.46
$0.46
-39.5%
$0.28
$0.25
$0.17
$0.17
-40.2%
CCP
$1.14
$0.25
$0.46
$0.18
$0.25
0.0%
$0.09
$0.17
$0.07
$0.09
-1.2%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.61
$2.61
na
na
na
na
$0.96
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$103.13
$32.77
$31.95
$21.80
$16.61
-49.3%
$12.08
$11.73
$7.97
$6.05
-49.9%
Kentucky
Population**
4,088,510
4,116,780
4,141,835
4,173,405
2.1%
SHSGP
$86.99
$32.84
$26.78
$16.86
$10.51
-68.0%
$8.03
$6.51
$4.07
$2.52
-68.6%
LETPP
$18.40
na
$7.95
$6.13
$4.32
-45.7%
$0.00
$1.93
$1.48
$1.04
-46.4%
EMPG
$10.98
$2.62
$2.75
$2.76
$2.85
8.6%
$0.64
$0.67
$0.67
$0.68
6.4%
MMRS
$1.85
$0.28
$0.65
$0.46
$0.46
64.3%
$0.07
$0.16
$0.11
$0.11
60.9%
CCP
$1.37
$0.30
$0.56
$0.21
$0.30
0.0%
$0.07
$0.14
$0.05
$0.07
-2.0%

---

CRS-32
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
UASI
Louisville
$22.51
$0.00
$8.99
$5.00
$8.52
-5.2%
$0.00
$2.18
$1.21
$2.04
-6.5%
CIP
$3.18
$3.18
na
na
na
na
$0.78
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$145.28
$39.22
$47.68
$31.42
$26.96
-31.3%
$9.59
$11.58
$7.59
$6.46
-32.7%
Louisiana
Population**
4,475,003
4,490,380
4,506,685
4,523,628
1.1%
SHSGP
$92.32
$34.49
$28.13
$17.68
$12.02
-65.1%
$7.71
$6.26
$3.92
$2.66
-65.5%
LETPP
$23.52
na
$8.35
$6.43
$8.74
4.7%
$0.00
$1.86
$1.43
$1.93
3.9%
EMPG
$11.53
$2.75
$2.89
$2.90
$2.99
8.7%
$0.61
$0.64
$0.64
$0.66
7.5%
MMRS
$4.60
$1.32
$1.44
$0.91
$0.93
-29.5%
$0.30
$0.32
$0.20
$0.21
-30.3%
CCP
$1.43
$0.31
$0.58
$0.22
$0.32
3.2%
$0.07
$0.13
$0.05
$0.07
2.1%
UASI
Baton Rouge
$16.16
$0.00
$7.19
$5.23
$3.74
-48.0%
$0.00
$1.60
$1.16
$0.83
-48.4%
New Orleans
$21.15
$0.00
$7.15
$9.31
$4.69
-34.4%
$0.00
$1.59
$2.07
$1.04
-34.9%
CIP
$3.34
$3.34
na
na
na
na
$0.75
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$174.04
$42.21
$55.73
$42.68
$33.43
-20.8%
$9.43
$12.41
$9.47
$7.39
-21.7%

---

CRS-33
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Maine
Population**
1,296,978
1,308,245
1,314,985
1,321,505
1.9%
SHSGP
$53.27
$20.98
$17.11
$10.79
$4.39
-79.1%
$16.18
$13.08
$8.21
$3.32
-79.5%
LETPP
$12.20
na
$5.08
$3.92
$3.20
-37.0%
$0.00
$3.88
$2.98
$2.42
-37.6%
EMPG
$7.01
$1.67
$1.76
$1.76
$1.82
8.9%
$1.29
$1.35
$1.34
$1.38
6.9%
MMRS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$0.88
$0.19
$0.36
$0.14
$0.19
0.0%
$0.15
$0.28
$0.11
$0.14
-1.9%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.03
$2.03
na
na
na
na
$1.57
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$75.39
$24.87
$24.31
$16.61
$9.60
-61.4%
$19.18
$18.58
$12.63
$7.26
-62.1%
Maryland
Population**
5,442,268
5,512,477
5,561,332
5,600,388
2.9%
SHSGP
$98.11
$38.62
$31.50
$19.87
$8.12
-79.0%
$7.10
$5.71
$3.57
$1.45
-79.6%
LETPP
$22.48
na
$9.35
$7.22
$5.91
-36.8%
$0.00
$1.70
$1.30
$1.06
-37.8%
EMPG
$12.91
$3.08
$3.24
$3.24
$3.35
8.7%
$0.57
$0.59
$0.58
$0.60
5.6%
MMRS
$1.20
$0.28
$0.46
$0.23
$0.23
-17.9%
$0.05
$0.08
$0.04
$0.04
-20.2%
CCP
$1.61
$0.35
$0.65
$0.25
$0.36
2.9%
$0.06
$0.12
$0.05
$0.06
0.0%

---

CRS-34
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
UASI
Baltimore
$47.93
$10.90
$15.92
$11.44
$9.67
-11.3%
$2.00
$2.89
$2.06
$1.73
-13.8%
CIP
$3.74
$3.74
na
na
na
na
$0.69
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$187.98
$56.97
$61.12
$42.25
$27.64
-51.5%
$10.47
$11.09
$7.60
$4.93
-52.9%
Massachusetts
Population**
6,411,568
6,417,565
6,407,382
6,398,743
-0.2%
SHSGP
$111.15
$42.73
$34.85
$21.86
$11.71
-72.6%
$6.66
$5.43
$3.41
$1.83
-72.5%
LETPP
$28.53
na
$10.34
$7.95
$10.24
-1.0%
$0.00
$1.61
$1.24
$1.60
-0.7%
EMPG
$14.28
$3.41
$3.58
$3.59
$3.70
8.6%
$0.53
$0.56
$0.56
$0.58
8.8%
MMRS
$3.77
$1.24
$1.15
$0.68
$0.70
-43.5%
$0.19
$0.18
$0.11
$0.11
-43.4%
CCP
$1.78
$0.39
$0.72
$0.28
$0.39
0.0%
$0.06
$0.11
$0.04
$0.06
0.2%
UASI
Boston
$82.15
$16.73
$19.13
$28.08
$18.21
8.8%
$2.61
$2.98
$4.38
$2.85
9.1%
CIP
$4.14
$4.14
na
na
na
na
$0.65
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$245.80
$68.64
$69.77
$62.44
$44.95
-34.5%
$10.71
$10.87
$9.75
$7.03
-34.4%

---

CRS-35
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Michigan
Population**
10,039,379
10,078,146
10,104,206
10,120,860
0.8%
SHSGP
$150.83
$58.08
$47.36
$29.74
$15.65
-73.1%
$5.79
$4.70
$2.94
$1.55
-73.3%
LETPP
$36.25
na
$14.05
$10.81
$11.39
-18.9%
$0.00
$1.39
$1.07
$1.13
-19.3%
EMPG
$19.41
$4.63
$4.87
$4.88
$5.03
8.7%
$0.46
$0.48
$0.48
$0.50
7.8%
MMRS
$3.07
$1.04
$0.65
$0.68
$0.70
-32.7%
$0.10
$0.06
$0.07
$0.07
-33.2%
CCP
$2.42
$0.53
$0.98
$0.38
$0.53
0.0%
$0.05
$0.10
$0.04
$0.05
-0.8%
UASI
Detroit
$62.23
$12.27
$13.75
$17.58
$18.63
51.8%
$1.22
$1.36
$1.74
$1.84
50.6%
CIP
$5.62
$5.62
na
na
na
na
$0.56
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$279.83
$82.17
$81.66
$64.07
$51.93
-36.8%
$8.18
$8.10
$6.34
$5.13
-37.3%
Minnesota
Population**
5,023,526
5,061,662
5,096,546
5,132,799
2.2%
SHSGP
$90.44
$36.77
$29.98
$18.90
$4.79
-87.0%
$7.32
$5.92
$3.71
$0.93
-87.3%
LETPP
$19.26
na
$8.90
$6.87
$3.49
-60.8%
$0.00
$1.76
$1.35
$0.68
-61.3%
EMPG
$12.29
$2.93
$3.08
$3.09
$3.19
8.7%
$0.58
$0.61
$0.61
$0.62
6.4%
MMRS
$2.28
$0.56
$0.80
$0.46
$0.46
-17.9%
$0.11
$0.16
$0.09
$0.09
-19.6%

---

CRS-36
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
CCP
$1.53
$0.33
$0.62
$0.24
$0.34
3.0%
$0.07
$0.12
$0.05
$0.07
0.8%
UASI
Minneapolis
$30.18
$0.00
$20.11
$5.76
$4.31
-78.6%
$0.00
$3.97
$1.13
$0.84
-78.9%
CIP
$3.56
$3.56
na
na
na
na
$0.71
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$159.54
$44.15
$63.49
$35.32
$16.58
-62.5%
$8.79
$12.54
$6.93
$3.23
-63.3%
Mississippi
Population**
2,866,349
2,880,793
2,900,768
2,921,088
1.9%
SHSGP
$69.07
$27.67
$22.56
$14.19
$4.65
-83.2%
$9.65
$7.83
$4.89
$1.59
-83.5%
LETPP
$15.24
na
$6.69
$5.16
$3.39
-49.3%
$0.00
$2.32
$1.78
$1.16
-50.0%
EMPG
$9.25
$2.21
$2.32
$2.32
$2.40
8.5%
$0.77
$0.81
$0.80
$0.82
6.4%
MMRS
$1.14
$0.28
$0.40
$0.23
$0.23
-17.9%
$0.10
$0.14
$0.08
$0.08
-19.4%
CCP
$1.16
$0.25
$0.47
$0.18
$0.26
4.0%
$0.09
$0.16
$0.06
$0.09
2.1%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.68
$2.68
na
na
na
na
$0.94
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$98.54
$33.09
$32.44
$22.08
$10.93
-67.0%
$11.54
$11.26
$7.61
$3.74
-67.6%

---

CRS-37
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Missouri
Population**
5,681,045
5,718,717
5,759,532
5,800,310
2.1%
SHSGP
$110.04
$39.53
$32.24
$20.29
$17.98
-54.5%
$6.96
$5.64
$3.52
$3.10
-55.5%
LETPP
$22.56
na
$9.57
$7.38
$5.61
-41.4%
$0.00
$1.67
$1.28
$0.97
-42.2%
EMPG
$13.21
$3.15
$3.31
$3.32
$3.43
8.8%
$0.55
$0.58
$0.58
$0.59
6.5%
MMRS
$2.53
$0.56
$1.05
$0.46
$0.46
-17.9%
$0.10
$0.18
$0.08
$0.08
-19.5%
CCP
$1.66
$0.36
$0.67
$0.26
$0.37
2.8%
$0.06
$0.12
$0.05
$0.06
0.7%
UASI
Kansas City
$40.45
$9.70
$13.30
$8.21
$9.24
-4.7%
$1.71
$2.33
$1.43
$1.59
-6.7%
St. Louis
$36.88
$9.85
$10.79
$7.04
$9.20
-6.6%
$1.73
$1.89
$1.22
$1.59
-8.5%
CIP
$3.83
$3.83
na
na
na
na
$0.67
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$231.16
$66.98
$70.93
$46.96
$46.29
-30.9%
$11.79
$12.40
$8.15
$7.98
-32.3%
Montana
Population**
910,395
917,885
926,920
935,670
2.8%
SHSGP
$49.57
$19.35
$15.78
$9.95
$4.49
-76.8%
$21.25
$17.19
$10.73
$4.80
-77.4%
LETPP
$11.56
na
$4.68
$3.62
$3.26
-30.3%
$0.00
$5.10
$3.91
$3.48
-31.7%
EMPG
$6.46
$1.54
$1.62
$1.62
$1.68
8.9%
$1.69
$1.76
$1.75
$1.79
5.9%

---

CRS-38
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
MMRS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$0.82
$0.18
$0.33
$0.13
$0.18
0.0%
$0.20
$0.36
$0.14
$0.19
-2.7%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$1.87
$1.87
na
na
na
na
$2.05
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$70.28
$22.94
$22.41
$15.32
$9.61
-58.1%
$25.20
$24.41
$16.53
$10.27
-59.3%
Nebraska
Population**
1,726,753
1,738,013
1,747,704
1,758,787
1.9%
SHSGP
$64.35
$22.82
$18.61
$11.72
$11.20
-50.9%
$13.22
$10.71
$6.71
$6.37
-51.8%
LETPP
$11.32
na
$5.52
$4.26
$1.54
-72.1%
$0.00
$3.18
$2.44
$0.88
-72.4%
EMPG
$7.63
$1.82
$1.91
$1.92
$1.98
8.7%
$1.05
$1.10
$1.10
$1.12
6.7%
MMRS
$1.98
$0.56
$0.50
$0.46
$0.46
-17.9%
$0.32
$0.29
$0.26
$0.26
-19.4%
CCP
$0.96
$0.21
$0.39
$0.15
$0.21
0.0%
$0.12
$0.22
$0.09
$0.12
-1.8%
UASI
Omaha
$13.48
$0.00
$0.00
$5.15
$8.33
61.7%
$0.00
$0.00
$2.95
$4.74
60.7%
CIP
$2.21
$2.21
na
na
na
na
$1.28
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$101.93
$27.62
$26.93
$23.66
$23.72
-14.1%
$16.00
$15.49
$13.54
$13.49
-15.7%

---

CRS-39
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Nevada
Population**
2,167,867
2,241,700
2,332,898
2,414,807
11.4%
SHSGP
$65.78
$24.71
$20.15
$12.81
$8.11
-67.2%
$11.40
$8.99
$5.49
$3.36
-70.5%
LETPP
$14.82
na
$5.98
$4.66
$4.18
-30.1%
$0.00
$2.67
$2.00
$1.73
-35.1%
EMPG
$8.25
$1.97
$2.07
$2.07
$2.14
8.7%
$0.91
$0.92
$0.89
$0.89
-2.4%
MMRS
$1.14
$0.28
$0.40
$0.23
$0.23
-17.9%
$0.13
$0.18
$0.10
$0.10
-26.3%
CCP
$1.04
$0.22
$0.42
$0.16
$0.24
9.1%
$0.10
$0.19
$0.07
$0.10
-2.1%
UASI
Las Vegas
$26.74
$0.00
$10.53
$8.46
$7.75
-26.4%
$0.00
$4.70
$3.63
$3.21
-31.7%
CIP
$2.39
$2.39
na
na
na
na
$1.10
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$120.16
$29.57
$39.55
$28.39
$22.65
-23.4%
$13.64
$17.64
$12.17
$9.38
-31.2%
New Hampshire
Population**
1,274,666
1,287,594
1,299,169
1,309,940
2.8%
SHSGP
$53.01
$20.90
$17.04
$10.75
$4.32
-79.3%
$16.40
$13.23
$8.27
$3.30
-79.9%
LETPP
$12.11
na
$5.06
$3.91
$3.14
-37.9%
$0.00
$3.93
$3.01
$2.40
-39.0%
EMPG
$6.98
$1.67
$1.75
$1.75
$1.81
8.5%
$1.31
$1.36
$1.35
$1.38
5.5%
MMRS
$1.46
$0.60
$0.40
$0.23
$0.23
-61.7%
$0.47
$0.31
$0.18
$0.18
-62.7%

---

CRS-40
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
CCP
$0.87
$0.19
$0.35
$0.14
$0.19
0.0%
$0.15
$0.27
$0.11
$0.15
-2.7%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.02
$2.02
na
na
na
na
$1.58
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$76.45
$25.38
$24.60
$16.78
$9.69
-61.8%
$19.91
$19.11
$12.92
$7.40
-62.8%
New Jersey
Population**
8,576,089
8,640,028
8,685,166
8,717,925
1.7%
SHSGP
$130.01
$51.89
$42.32
$26.63
$9.17
-82.3%
$6.05
$4.90
$3.07
$1.05
-82.6%
LETPP
$29.78
na
$12.56
$9.68
$7.54
-40.0%
$0.00
$1.45
$1.11
$0.86
-40.5%
EMPG
$17.35
$4.14
$4.35
$4.36
$4.50
8.6%
$0.48
$0.50
$0.50
$0.52
6.9%
MMRS
$2.13
$0.56
$0.65
$0.46
$0.46
-17.9%
$0.07
$0.08
$0.05
$0.05
-19.2%
CCP
$2.17
$0.47
$0.88
$0.34
$0.48
2.1%
$0.05
$0.10
$0.04
$0.06
0.5%
UASI
Jersey City
$97.56
$11.89
$32.17
$19.17
$34.33
188.7%
$1.39
$3.72
$2.21
$3.94
184.0%
CIP
$5.02
$5.02
na
na
na
na
$0.59
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$284.02
$73.97
$92.93
$60.64
$56.48
-23.6%
$8.63
$10.76
$6.98
$6.48
-24.9%

---

CRS-41
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
New Mexico
Population**
1,855,400
1,879,252
1,903,006
1,928,384
3.9%
SHSGP
$58.96
$23.36
$19.05
$12.02
$4.53
-80.6%
$12.59
$10.14
$6.32
$2.35
-81.3%
LETPP
$13.31
na
$5.65
$4.37
$3.29
-41.8%
$0.00
$3.01
$2.30
$1.71
-43.3%
EMPG
$7.80
$1.86
$1.96
$1.96
$2.02
8.8%
$1.00
$1.04
$1.03
$1.05
4.7%
MMRS
$0.91
$0.28
$0.40
$0.00
$0.23
-17.9%
$0.15
$0.21
$0.00
$0.12
-21.0%
CCP
$0.98
$0.21
$0.40
$0.15
$0.22
4.8%
$0.11
$0.21
$0.08
$0.11
0.8%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.26
$2.26
na
na
na
na
$1.22
na
na
na
na
Total
$84.22
$27.97
$27.46
$18.50
$10.29
-63.2%
$15.07
$14.61
$9.72
$5.34
-64.6%
New York
Population**
19,164,755
19,228,031
19,280,727
19,254,630
0.5%
SHSGP
$252.37
$96.66
$78.83
$49.42
$27.46
-71.6%
$5.04
$4.10
$2.56
$1.43
-71.7%
LETPP
$67.37
na
$23.39
$17.97
$26.01
11.2%
$0.00
$1.22
$0.93
$1.35
11.0%
EMPG
$32.29
$7.70
$8.10
$8.11
$8.38
8.8%
$0.40
$0.42
$0.42
$0.44
8.3%
MMRS
$6.79
$1.60
$2.89
$1.14
$1.16
-27.5%
$0.08
$0.15
$0.06
$0.06
-27.8%
CCP
$4.03
$0.88
$1.64
$0.63
$0.88
0.0%
$0.05
$0.09
$0.03
$0.05
-0.5%

---

CRS-42
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
UASI
Buffalo
$31.29
$10.27
$10.10
$7.21
$3.71
-63.9%
$0.54
$0.53
$0.37
$0.19
-64.0%
New York
$528.79
$149.77
$47.01
$207.56
$124.45
-16.9%
$7.81
$2.44
$10.77
$6.46
-17.3%
CIP
$9.36
$9.36
na
na
na
na
$0.49
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$932.29
$276.24
$171.96
$292.04
$192.05
-30.5%
$14.41
$8.94
$15.15
$9.97
-30.8%
North Carolina
Population**
8,312,755
8,422,375
8,540,468
8,683,242
4.5%
SHSGP
$129.04
$50.75
$41.38
$26.13
$10.78
-78.8%
$6.11
$4.91
$3.06
$1.24
-79.7%
LETPP
$31.34
na
$12.28
$9.50
$9.56
-22.2%
$0.00
$1.46
$1.11
$1.10
-24.5%
EMPG
$16.96
$4.05
$4.25
$4.26
$4.40
8.6%
$0.49
$0.50
$0.50
$0.51
4.0%
MMRS
$5.43
$2.62
$1.20
$0.91
$0.70
-73.3%
$0.32
$0.14
$0.11
$0.08
-74.4%
CCP
$2.13
$0.46
$0.86
$0.33
$0.48
4.3%
$0.06
$0.10
$0.04
$0.06
-0.1%
UASI
Charlotte
$21.85
$0.00
$7.40
$5.48
$8.97
21.2%
$0.00
$0.88
$0.64
$1.03
17.6%
CIP
$4.91
$4.91
na
na
na
na
$0.59
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$211.66
$62.79
$67.37
$46.61
$34.89
-44.4%
$7.55
$8.00
$5.46
$4.02
-46.8%

---

CRS-43
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
North Dakota
Population**
633,571
633,051
636,308
636,677
0.5%
SHSGP
$48.62
$18.18
$14.83
$9.34
$6.27
-65.5%
$28.69
$23.43
$14.68
$9.85
-65.7%
LETPP
$12.14
na
$4.40
$3.39
$4.35
-1.1%
$0.00
$6.95
$5.33
$6.83
-1.7%
EMPG
$6.08
$1.45
$1.52
$1.53
$1.58
8.7%
$2.29
$2.40
$2.40
$2.48
8.1%
MMRS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$0.77
$0.17
$0.31
$0.12
$0.17
0.0%
$0.27
$0.49
$0.19
$0.27
-0.5%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$1.76
$1.76
na
na
na
na
$2.78
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$69.37
$21.56
$21.06
$14.38
$12.37
-42.6%
$34.03
$33.27
$22.60
$19.42
-42.9%
Ohio
Population**
11,404,651
11,431,748
11,450,143
11,464,042
0.5%
SHSGP
$161.29
$63.89
$52.10
$32.67
$12.63
-80.2%
$5.60
$4.56
$2.85
$1.10
-80.3%
LETPP
$36.52
na
$15.46
$11.88
$9.18
-40.6%
$0.00
$1.35
$1.04
$0.80
-40.8%
EMPG
$21.36
$5.10
$5.36
$5.36
$5.54
8.6%
$0.45
$0.47
$0.47
$0.48
8.0%
MMRS
$6.75
$1.68
$2.31
$1.37
$1.39
-17.3%
$0.15
$0.20
$0.12
$0.12
-17.7%
CCP
$2.65
$0.58
$1.08
$0.41
$0.58
0.0%
$0.05
$0.09
$0.04
$0.05
-0.5%
UASI
Cincinnati
$31.27
$7.99
$12.75
$5.87
$4.66
-41.7%
$0.70
$1.12
$0.51
$0.41
-42.0%
Cleveland
$28.45
$5.87
$10.46
$7.39
$4.73
-19.4%
$0.51
$0.92
$0.65
$0.41
-19.8%

---

CRS-44
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Columbus
$20.60
$0.00
$8.71
$7.57
$4.32
-50.4%
$0.00
$0.76
$0.66
$0.38
-50.5%
Toledo
$9.16
$0.00
$0.00
$5.31
$3.85
-27.5%
$0.00
$0.00
$0.46
$0.34
-27.6%
CIP
$6.18
$6.18
na
na
na
na
$0.54
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$324.23
$91.29
$108.23
$77.83
$46.88
-48.7%
$8.00
$9.47
$6.80
$4.09
-48.9%
Oklahoma
Population**
3,487,076
3,504,917
3,523,546
3,547,884
1.7%
SHSGP
$79.04
$30.30
$24.71
$15.55
$8.48
-72.0%
$8.69
$7.05
$4.41
$2.39
-72.5%
LETPP
$19.16
na
$7.33
$5.66
$6.17
-15.8%
$0.00
$2.09
$1.61
$1.74
-16.8%
EMPG
$10.13
$2.42
$2.54
$2.54
$2.63
8.5%
$0.69
$0.72
$0.72
$0.74
6.6%
MMRS
$2.90
$0.56
$1.42
$0.46
$0.46
-17.9%
$0.16
$0.40
$0.13
$0.13
-19.3%
CCP
$1.27
$0.28
$0.51
$0.20
$0.28
0.0%
$0.08
$0.15
$0.06
$0.08
-1.7%
UASI
Ok. City
$9.67
$0.00
$0.00
$5.57
$4.10
-26.4%
$0.00
$0.00
$1.58
$1.16
-26.9%
CIP
$2.93
$2.93
na
na
na
na
$0.84
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$125.09
$36.49
$36.51
$29.98
$22.12
-39.4%
$10.46
$10.42
$8.51
$6.23
-40.4%

---

CRS-45
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Oregon
Population**
3,522,342
3,562,681
3,591,363
3,641,056
3.4%
SHSGP
$75.56
$30.42
$24.80
$15.66
$4.68
-84.6%
$8.64
$6.96
$4.36
$1.29
-85.1%
LETPP
$16.45
na
$7.36
$5.69
$3.40
-53.8%
$0.00
$2.07
$1.58
$0.93
-54.8%
EMPG
$10.16
$2.42
$2.55
$2.55
$2.64
8.9%
$0.69
$0.72
$0.71
$0.72
5.4%
MMRS
$1.14
$0.28
$0.40
$0.23
$0.23
-17.9%
$0.08
$0.11
$0.06
$0.06
-20.5%
CCP
$1.28
$0.28
$0.52
$0.20
$0.28
0.0%
$0.08
$0.15
$0.06
$0.08
-3.3%
UASI
Portland
$34.78
$6.77
$8.16
$10.49
$9.36
38.3%
$1.92
$2.29
$2.92
$2.57
33.7%
CIP
$2.94
$2.94
na
na
na
na
$0.83
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$142.31
$43.11
$43.79
$34.82
$20.59
-52.2%
$12.24
$12.29
$9.70
$5.65
-53.8%
Pennsylvania
Population**
12,324,415
12,364,930
12,394,471
12,429,616
0.9%
SHSGP
$170.51
$67.76
$55.26
$34.68
$12.81
-81.1%
$5.50
$4.47
$2.80
$1.03
-81.3%
LETPP
$40.06
na
$16.40
$12.61
$11.05
-32.6%
$0.00
$1.33
$1.02
$0.89
-33.0%
EMPG
$22.64
$5.40
$5.68
$5.69
$5.87
8.7%
$0.44
$0.46
$0.46
$0.47
7.8%
MMRS
$1.88
$0.56
$0.40
$0.46
$0.46
-17.9%
$0.05
$0.03
$0.04
$0.04
-18.6%

---

CRS-46
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
CCP
$2.83
$0.62
$1.15
$0.44
$0.62
0.0%
$0.05
$0.09
$0.04
$0.05
-0.8%
UASI
Philadelphia
$79.64
$14.22
$23.08
$22.82
$19.52
37.3%
$1.15
$1.87
$1.84
$1.57
36.1%
Pittsburgh
$33.31
$6.82
$11.98
$9.64
$4.87
-28.6%
$0.55
$0.97
$0.78
$0.39
-29.2%
CIP
$6.56
$6.56
na
na
na
na
$0.53
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$357.43
$101.94
$113.95
$86.34
$55.20
-45.8%
$8.27
$9.22
$6.97
$4.44
-46.3%
Rhode Island
Population**
1,068,550
1,075,729
1,079,916
1,076,189
0.7%
SHSGP
$51.11
$20.03
$16.33
$10.29
$4.46
-77.7%
$18.75
$15.18
$9.53
$4.14
-77.9%
LETPP
$11.55
na
$4.85
$3.74
$2.96
-39.0%
$0.00
$4.51
$3.46
$2.75
-39.0%
EMPG
$6.70
$1.60
$1.68
$1.68
$1.74
8.5%
$1.50
$1.56
$1.56
$1.61
7.7%
MMRS
$0.94
$0.48
$0.00
$0.23
$0.23
-52.1%
$0.45
$0.00
$0.21
$0.21
-52.4%
CCP
$0.84
$0.18
$0.34
$0.13
$0.19
5.6%
$0.17
$0.32
$0.12
$0.18
4.8%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$1.94
$1.94
na
na
na
na
$1.82
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$73.08
$24.23
$23.20
$16.07
$9.58
-60.5%
$22.68
$21.57
$14.88
$8.90
-60.8%

---

CRS-47
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
South Carolina
Population**
4,102,568
4,146,753
4,197,892
4,255,083
3.7%
SHSGP
$86.70
$32.90
$26.83
$16.93
$10.04
-69.5%
$8.02
$6.47
$4.03
$2.36
-70.6%
LETPP
$18.21
na
$7.96
$6.15
$4.10
-48.5%
$0.00
$1.92
$1.47
$0.96
-49.8%
EMPG
$10.99
$2.62
$2.76
$2.76
$2.85
8.8%
$0.64
$0.67
$0.66
$0.67
4.9%
MMRS
$1.19
$0.48
$0.25
$0.23
$0.23
-52.1%
$0.12
$0.06
$0.05
$0.05
-53.8%
CCP
$1.38
$0.30
$0.56
$0.21
$0.31
3.3%
$0.07
$0.14
$0.05
$0.07
-0.4%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$3.18
$3.18
na
na
na
na
$0.78
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$121.65
$39.48
$38.36
$26.28
$17.53
-55.6%
$9.62
$9.25
$6.26
$4.12
-57.2%
South Dakota
Population**
760,368
764,599
770,621
775,933
2.0%
SHSGP
$47.99
$18.72
$15.27
$9.62
$4.38
-76.6%
$24.62
$19.97
$12.48
$5.64
-77.1%
LETPP
$11.21
na
$4.53
$3.50
$3.18
-29.8%
$0.00
$5.92
$4.54
$4.10
-30.8%
EMPG
$6.25
$1.49
$1.57
$1.57
$1.62
8.9%
$1.96
$2.05
$2.04
$2.09
6.7%
MMRS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$0.78
$0.17
$0.32
$0.12
$0.17
0.0%
$0.22
$0.42
$0.16
$0.22
-2.0%

---

CRS-48
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$1.81
$1.81
na
na
na
na
$2.38
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$68.04
$22.19
$21.69
$14.81
$9.35
-57.9%
$29.18
$28.37
$19.22
$12.05
-58.7%
Tennessee
Population**
5,790,312
5,841,585
5,893,298
5,962,959
3.0%
SHSGP
$98.10
$40.06
$32.67
$20.59
$4.78
-88.1%
$6.92
$5.59
$3.49
$0.80
-88.4%
LETPP
$20.66
na
$9.69
$7.49
$3.48
-64.1%
$0.00
$1.66
$1.27
$0.58
-64.8%
EMPG
$13.38
$3.19
$3.36
$3.36
$3.47
8.8%
$0.55
$0.58
$0.57
$0.58
5.7%
MMRS
$4.81
$1.52
$1.45
$0.91
$0.93
-38.8%
$0.26
$0.25
$0.15
$0.16
-40.6%
CCP
$1.67
$0.36
$0.68
$0.26
$0.37
2.8%
$0.06
$0.12
$0.04
$0.06
-0.2%
UASI
Memphis
$20.34
$6.07
$10.07
$0.00
$4.20
-30.8%
$1.05
$1.72
$0.00
$0.70
-32.8%
CIP
$3.88
$3.88
na
na
na
na
$0.67
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$162.84
$55.08
$57.92
$32.61
$17.23
-68.7%
$9.51
$9.92
$5.53
$2.89
-69.6%
Texas
Population**
21,722,394
22,099,136
22,471,549
22,859,968
5.2%
SHSGP
$277.55
$107.78
$87.89
$55.74
$26.14
-75.7%
$4.96
$3.98
$2.48
$1.14
-76.9%
LETPP
$71.09
na
$26.08
$20.27
$24.74
-5.1%
$0.00
$1.18
$0.90
$1.08
-8.3%
EMPG
$36.00
$8.58
$9.03
$9.05
$9.34
8.8%
$0.40
$0.41
$0.40
$0.41
3.4%
MMRS
$15.18
$4.36
$4.84
$2.96
$3.02
-30.7%
$0.20
$0.22
$0.13
$0.13
-34.2%

---

CRS-49
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
CCP
$4.54
$0.98
$1.83
$0.71
$1.02
4.1%
$0.05
$0.08
$0.03
$0.04
-1.1%
UASI
Dallas
$60.79
$10.40
$12.20
$24.36
$13.83
33.0%
$0.48
$0.55
$1.08
$0.61
26.4%
Houston
$78.97
$23.77
$19.96
$18.57
$16.67
-29.9%
$1.09
$0.90
$0.83
$0.73
-33.4%
San Antonio
$16.73
$0.00
$6.30
$5.97
$4.46
-29.2%
$0.00
$0.29
$0.27
$0.20
-31.6%
CIP
$10.43
$10.43
na
na
na
na
$0.48
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$571.28
$166.30
$168.13
$137.63
$99.22
-40.3%
$7.66
$7.61
$6.12
$4.34
-43.3%
Utah
Population**
2,336,673
2,378,696
2,420,708
2,469,585
5.7%
SHSGP
$63.52
$25.31
$20.64
$13.05
$4.52
-82.1%
$10.83
$8.68
$5.39
$1.83
-83.1%
LETPP
$14.15
na
$6.13
$4.74
$3.28
-46.5%
$0.00
$2.58
$1.96
$1.33
-48.5%
EMPG
$8.45
$2.02
$2.12
$2.12
$2.19
8.6%
$0.86
$0.89
$0.88
$0.89
2.7%
MMRS
$1.14
$0.28
$0.40
$0.23
$0.23
-17.9%
$0.12
$0.17
$0.10
$0.09
-22.3%
CCP
$1.07
$0.23
$0.43
$0.17
$0.24
4.3%
$0.10
$0.18
$0.07
$0.10
-1.3%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.45
$2.45
na
na
na
na
$1.05
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$90.78
$30.29
$29.72
$20.31
$10.46
-65.5%
$12.96
$12.49
$8.39
$4.24
-67.3%

---

CRS-50
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
Vermont
Population**
616,274
619,092
621,233
623,050
1.10%
SHSGP
$49.40
$18.11
$14.77
$9.30
$7.22
-60.1%
$29.39
$23.86
$14.97
$11.59
-60.6%
LETPP
$11.28
na
$4.38
$3.38
$3.52
-19.6%
$0.00
$7.07
$5.44
$5.65
-20.1%
EMPG
$6.05
$1.44
$1.52
$1.52
$1.57
9.0%
$2.34
$2.46
$2.45
$2.52
7.8%
MMRS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$0.76
$0.16
$0.31
$0.12
$0.17
6.3%
$0.26
$0.50
$0.19
$0.27
5.1%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$1.75
$1.75
na
na
na
na
$2.84
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$69.24
$21.46
$20.98
$14.32
$12.48
-41.8%
$34.82
$33.89
$23.05
$20.03
-42.5%
Virginia
Population**
7,286,061
7,383,387
7,481,332
7,567,465
3.9%
SHSGP
$116.88
$46.40
$37.84
$23.92
$8.72
-81.2%
$6.37
$5.13
$3.20
$1.15
-81.9%
LETPP
$26.27
na
$11.23
$8.70
$6.34
-43.5%
$0.00
$1.52
$1.16
$0.84
-44.9%
EMPG
$15.50
$3.70
$3.89
$3.89
$4.02
8.7%
$0.51
$0.53
$0.52
$0.53
4.6%
MMRS
$7.84
$2.35
$2.73
$1.37
$1.39
-40.9%
$0.32
$0.37
$0.18
$0.18
-43.1%
CCP
$1.94
$0.42
$0.79
$0.30
$0.43
2.4%
$0.06
$0.11
$0.04
$0.06
-1.4%

---

CRS-51
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
UASI
$6.54
$0.00
$6.54
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.89
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$4.49
$4.49
na
na
na
na
$0.62
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$179.46
$57.36
$63.02
$38.18
$20.90
-63.6%
$7.87
$8.54
$5.10
$2.76
-64.9%
Washington
Population**
6,066,319
6,131,131
6,207,046
6,287,759
3.7%
SHSGP
$108.76
$41.21
$33.61
$21.21
$12.73
-69.1%
$6.79
$5.48
$3.42
$2.02
-70.2%
LETPP
$26.94
na
$9.97
$7.71
$9.26
-7.1%
$0.00
$1.63
$1.24
$1.47
-9.4%
EMPG
$13.76
$3.28
$3.45
$3.46
$3.57
8.9%
$0.54
$0.56
$0.56
$0.57
5.0%
MMRS
$3.02
$0.84
$0.80
$0.68
$0.70
-16.7%
$0.14
$0.13
$0.11
$0.11
-19.6%
CCP
$1.72
$0.37
$0.70
$0.27
$0.38
2.7%
$0.06
$0.11
$0.04
$0.06
-0.9%
UASI
Seattle
$67.05
$29.39
$16.52
$11.99
$9.15
-68.9%
$4.84
$2.69
$1.93
$1.46
-70.0%
CIP
$3.99
$3.99
na
na
na
na
$0.66
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$225.24
$79.08
$65.05
$45.32
$35.79
-54.7%
$13.04
$10.61
$7.30
$5.69
-56.3%

---

CRS-52
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
West Virginia
Population**
1,804,529
1,810,347
1,812,548
1,816,856
0.7%
SHSGP
$61.44
$23.13
$18.86
$11.88
$7.57
-67.3%
$12.82
$10.42
$6.55
$4.17
-67.5%
LETPP
$15.43
na
$5.60
$4.32
$5.51
-1.6%
$0.00
$3.09
$2.38
$3.03
-2.0%
EMPG
$7.72
$1.84
$1.94
$1.94
$2.00
8.9%
$1.02
$1.07
$1.07
$1.10
8.2%
MMRS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$0.96
$0.21
$0.39
$0.15
$0.21
0.0%
$0.12
$0.22
$0.08
$0.12
-0.7%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$2.24
$2.24
na
na
na
na
$1.24
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$87.79
$27.42
$26.79
$18.29
$15.29
-44.2%
$15.20
$14.80
$10.09
$8.42
-44.6%
Wisconsin
Population**
5,439,137
5,471,792
5,503,533
5,536,201
1.8%
SHSGP
$98.49
$38.55
$31.44
$19.79
$8.71
-77.4%
$7.09
$5.75
$3.60
$1.57
-77.8%
LETPP
$22.86
na
$9.33
$7.20
$6.33
-32.2%
$0.00
$1.71
$1.31
$1.14
-32.9%
EMPG
$12.88
$3.07
$3.23
$3.24
$3.34
8.8%
$0.56
$0.59
$0.59
$0.60
6.9%
MMRS
$2.28
$0.56
$0.80
$0.46
$0.46
-17.9%
$0.10
$0.15
$0.08
$0.08
-19.3%
CCP
$1.61
$0.35
$0.65
$0.25
$0.36
2.9%
$0.06
$0.12
$0.05
$0.07
1.1%

---

CRS-53
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
UASI
Milwaukee
$25.08
$0.00
$10.18
$6.33
$8.57
-15.8%
$0.00
$1.86
$1.15
$1.55
-16.8%
CIP
$3.73
$3.73
na
na
na
na
$0.69
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$166.93
$46.26
$55.63
$37.27
$27.77
-40.0%
$8.51
$10.17
$6.77
$5.02
-41.0%
Wyoming
Population**
499,045
501,915
505,887
509,294
2.1%
SHSGP
$45.44
$17.61
$14.36
$9.05
$4.42
-74.9%
$35.29
$28.61
$17.89
$8.68
-75.4%
LETPP
$10.64
na
$4.26
$3.29
$3.09
-27.5%
$0.00
$8.49
$6.50
$6.07
-28.5%
EMPG
$5.90
$1.41
$1.48
$1.48
$1.53
8.2%
$2.83
$2.95
$2.93
$3.00
6.1%
MMRS
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$0.73
$0.16
$0.30
$0.11
$0.16
0.0%
$0.32
$0.60
$0.22
$0.31
-2.0%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$1.71
$1.71
na
na
na
na
$3.43
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$64.42
$20.89
$20.40
$13.93
$9.20
-56.0%
$41.86
$40.64
$27.54
$18.06
-56.9%
Puerto Rico
Population**
3,859,606
3,877,881
3,895,107
3,912,054
1.4%
SHSGP
$78.46
$31.85
$25.97
$16.34
$4.30
-86.5%
$8.25
$6.70
$4.20
$1.10
-86.7%

---

CRS-54
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
LETPP
$16.78
na
$7.71
$5.94
$3.13
-59.4%
$0.00
$1.99
$1.53
$0.80
-59.8%
EMPG
$10.64
$2.54
$2.67
$2.67
$2.76
8.6%
$0.66
$0.69
$0.69
$0.71
7.2%
MMRS
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CCP
$1.33
$0.29
$0.54
$0.21
$0.29
0.0%
$0.08
$0.14
$0.05
$0.07
-1.3%
UASI
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
CIP
$3.08
$3.08
na
na
na
na
$0.80
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$110.29
$37.76
$36.89
$25.16
$10.48
-72.2%
$9.78
$9.51
$6.46
$2.68
-72.6%
U.S. Virgin Is.
Population**
108,612
108,612
108,612
108,612
0.0%
SHSGP
$14.67
$5.63
$4.59
$2.89
$1.56
-72.3%
$51.84
$42.26
$26.61
$14.36
-72.3%
LETPP
$3.54
na
$1.36
$1.05
$1.13
-16.9%
$0.00
$12.52
$9.67
$10.40
-16.9%
EMPG
$2.54
$0.63
$0.63
$0.63
$0.65
3.8%
$5.80
$5.80
$5.80
$6.02
3.8%
CCP
$0.24
$0.05
$0.10
$0.04
$0.05
0.0%
$0.46
$0.92
$0.37
$0.46
0.0%
CIP
$0.55
$0.55
na
na
na
na
$5.06
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$21.54
$6.86
$6.68
$4.61
$3.39
-50.5%
$63.16
$61.50
$42.44
$31.25
-50.5%
American Samoa
Population**
57,794
57,794
57,794
57,794
0.0%
SHSGP
$14.72
$5.41
$4.41
$2.78
$2.12
-60.8%
$93.61
$76.31
$48.10
$36.68
-60.8%
LETPP
$4.85
na
$1.31
$1.01
$2.53
93.1%
$0.00
$22.67
$17.48
$43.78
93.1%

---

CRS-55
Amount Allocated (in millions)
Per Capita Amount
Percent
Percent
State and Program
FY2003 to
Change*
Change*
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003
FY2004
FY2005
FY2006
FY2003 to
FY2003 to
Total
FY2006
FY2006
EMPG
$1.80
$0.43
$0.45
$0.45
$0.47
9.0%
$7.44
$7.79
$7.79
$8.11
9.0%
CCP
$0.23
$0.05
$0.09
$0.04
$0.05
0.0%
$0.87
$1.56
$0.69
$0.87
0.0%
CIP
$0.52
$0.52
na
na
na
na
$9.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$22.12
$6.41
$6.26
$4.28
$5.17
-19.4%
$110.91
$108.32
$74.06
$89.43
-19.4%
Guam
Population**
171,019
171,019
171,019
171,019
0.0%
SHSGP
$15.11
$5.82
$4.75
$2.99
$1.55
-73.4%
$34.03
$27.77
$17.48
$9.06
-73.4%
LETPP
$3.63
na
$1.41
$1.09
$1.13
-19.9%
$0.00
$8.24
$6.37
$6.61
-19.9%
EMPG
$2.38
$0.59
$0.59
$0.59
$0.61
3.3%
$3.45
$3.45
$3.45
$3.56
3.3%
CCP
$0.24
$0.05
$0.10
$0.04
$0.05
0.0%
$0.29
$0.58
$0.23
$0.29
0.0%
CIP
$0.56
$0.56
na
na
na
na
$3.27
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$21.92
$7.02
$6.85
$4.71
$3.34
-52.4%
$41.05
$40.05
$27.54
$19.53
-52.4%
Northern Marianas
Population**
82,459
82,459
82,459
82,459
0.0%
SHSGP
$14.42
$5.46
$4.45
$2.81
$1.70
-68.9%
$66.21
$53.97
$34.08
$20.62
-68.9%
LETPP
$3.31
na
$1.32
$1.02
$0.97
-26.5%
$0.00
$16.01
$12.37
$11.76
-26.5%
EMPG
$1.90
$0.47
$0.47
$0.47
$0.49
3.7%
$5.70
$5.70
$5.70
$5.91
3.7%
CCP
$0.23
$0.05
$0.09
$0.04
$0.05
0.0%
$0.61
$1.09
$0.49
$0.61
0.0%
CIP
$0.53
$0.53
na
na
na
na
$6.43
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$20.39
$6.51
$6.33
$4.34
$3.21
-50.7%
$78.95
$76.77
$52.63
$38.90
-50.7%

---

CRS-56
Total for the United States, Puerto Rico, and Outlying Areas
Population**
287,984,799
290,850,005
293,656,842
296,410,404
2.9%
SHSGP
$5,341.76
$2,066.30
$1,685.00
$1,062.29
$528.17
-74.4%
$7.18
$5.79
$3.62
$1.78
-75.2%
LETPP
$1,270.41
na
$500.00
$386.29
$384.12
-23.2%
$0.00
$1.72
$1.32
$1.30
-24.6%
EMPG
$691.99
$165.14
$173.57
$173.83
$179.45
8.7%
$0.57
$0.60
$0.59
$0.61
5.6%
MMRS
$145.47
$42.29
$46.15
$28.22
$28.81
-31.9%
$0.15
$0.16
$0.10
$0.10
-33.8%
CCP
$86.50
$18.80
$35.00
$13.49
$19.21
2.2%
$0.07
$0.12
$0.05
$0.06
-0.7%
UASI
$2,822.23
$596.35
$665.72
$849.54
$710.62
19.2%
$2.07
$2.29
$2.89
$2.40
15.8%
CIP
$200.00
$200.00
na
na
na
na
$0.69
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
na
Total
$10,558.36
$3,088.88
$3,105.44
$2,513.66
$1,850.38
-40.1%
$10.73
$10.68
$8.56
$6.24
-45.9%
Source: Data for FY2003 to FY2005 are from U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office for Domestic Preparedness, program guidance and application kit for each respective
fiscal year. For FY2006, the data are from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Grants and Training.
* In some instances, the beginning year for calculating percentage change is a fiscal year later than FY2003.
** Population for the stated fiscal year is the population estimate on July 1 of the previous calendar year. For example, the population estimate for FY2006 is the population on July
1, 2005.
a. CRS calculations based on FY2003 CCP appropriations (P.L. 108-7).
b. The National Capital Region population used for this table is the Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C., 2002 estimated population from the U.S. Census Bureau.

---