Order Code 97-684
The Congressional Appropriations Process:
An Introduction
Updated February 22, 2007
Sandy Streeter
Analyst in American National Government
Government and Finance Division

The Congressional Appropriations Process:
An Introduction
Summary
Congress annually considers several appropriations measures, which provide
funding for numerous activities, for example, national defense, education, homeland
security, crime, as well as general government operations. Congress has developed
certain rules and practices for the consideration of appropriations measures, referred
to as the congressional appropriations process.
Appropriations measures are under the jurisdiction of the House and Senate
Appropriations Committees. These measures provide only about 40% of total federal
spending for a fiscal year. The House and Senate legislative committees control the
rest.
There are three types of appropriations measures. Regular appropriations bills
provide most of the funding that is provided in all appropriations measures for a
fiscal year, and must be enacted by October 1 of each year. If regular bills are not
enacted by the deadline, Congress adopts continuing resolutions to continue funding
generally until regular bills are enacted. Supplemental appropriations bills provide
additional appropriations and are typically considered later.
Each year Congress considers a budget resolution that, in part, sets spending
ceilings for the upcoming fiscal year. Both the House and Senate have established
parliamentary rules that may be used to enforce certain spending ceilings associated
with the budget resolution during consideration of appropriations measures in the
House and Senate, respectively.
Congress has also established an authorization-appropriation process that
provides for two separate types of measures — authorization bills and appropriation
bills. These measures perform different functions and are to be considered in
sequence. First, authorization bills establish, continue, or modify agencies or
programs. Second, appropriations measures may provide spending for the agencies
and programs previously authorized.

Contents
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Annual Appropriations Cycle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
President Submits Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Congress Adopts Budget Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Timetable for Consideration of Appropriations Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Work of the Appropriations Committees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
House and Senate Floor Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
House . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Senate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
House and Senate Conference Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Presidential Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Types of Appropriations Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Regular Appropriations Bills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Continuing Resolutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Supplementals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Spending Ceilings for Appropriations Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Allocations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Enforcement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
House . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Senate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Emergency Spending . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Relationship Between Authorization and
Appropriation Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Rescissions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
For Additional Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
CRS Products . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Congressional Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Selected Websites . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
List of Tables
Table 1. Number of Regular Appropriations Bills Packaged in Omnibus
(or Minibus) Measure, FY1977-FY2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Table 2. Regular Appropriations Bills Completed by Deadline and
Number of Continuing Resolutions, FY1977-FY2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Table 3. House Committee on Appropriations’ 302(a) Allocations for
FY2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Table 4. Initial House Appropriations Committee’s 302(b) Allocations for
FY2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18


The Congressional Appropriations Process:
An Introduction
Introduction
Congress annually considers several appropriations measures, which provide
funding for numerous activities, such as national defense, education, homeland
security, crime, and general government operations. These measures are considered
by Congress under certain rules and practices, referred to as the congressional
appropriations process
. This report discusses the following aspects of this process:
! annual appropriations cycle;
! appropriations measures (types);
! spending ceilings for appropriations associated with the annual
budget resolution; and
! relationship between authorization and appropriation measures.
When considering appropriations measures, Congress is exercising the power
granted to it under the Constitution, which states, “No money shall be drawn from
the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.”1 The power to
appropriate is a legislative power. Congress has enforced its prerogatives with laws
setting limits on U.S. government officials. A U.S. government employee, for
example, may not commit the government to spend more than the amount
appropriated by law and may not make such government funding obligations before
an appropriation funding those activities becomes law, unless such action is
statutorily authorized.2 An appropriation may be used only for the programs and
activities for which Congress made the appropriation, except as otherwise provided
by law.3
The President has an important role in the appropriations process by virtue of
his constitutional power to approve or veto entire measures, unless Congress
overrides a veto. He also has influence, in part, because of various duties imposed
by statute, such as submitting an annual budget to Congress.
1 U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 9.
2 The Antideficiency Act (31 U.S.C. 1341). This prohibition originated from a statute
enacted in 1870 (16 Stat. 251). U.S. Government Accountability Office, Principles of
Federal Appropriations Law
, 3rd edition, vol. 2, GAO-06-382SP (Washington: GPO, Feb.
2006), pp. 6-34 through 6-35.
3 31 U.S.C. 1301(a). This requirement was originally enacted in 1809 (2 Stat. 535). U.S.
Government Accountability Office, Principles of Federal Appropriations Law, 3rd edition,
vol. 1, GAO-04-261SP (Washington: GPO, Jan. 2004), pp. 4-6.

CRS-2
The House and Senate Committees on Appropriations have jurisdiction over the
annual appropriations measures. At the beginning of the 110th Congress, both
committees reorganized their subcommittees. Each committee now has 12
subcommittees and each subcommittee has jurisdiction over an annual
appropriations measure that provides funding for departments and agencies under the
subcommittee’s jurisdiction.4
The jurisdictions of these House and Senate appropriations subcommittees are
generally parallel. That is, each House appropriations subcommittee is paired with
a Senate appropriations subcommittee and the two subcommittees’ jurisdictions are
generally identical. The subcommittees follow:
! Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration,
and Related Agencies;
! Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies;
! Defense;
! Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies;
! Financial Services and General Government;
! Department of Homeland Security;
! Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies;
! Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and
Related Agencies;
! Legislative Branch;
! Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies;
! State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs; and
! Departments of Transportation, and Housing and Urban
Development, and Related Agencies.
Annual Appropriations Cycle
President Submits Budget
The President initiates the appropriations process by submitting his annual
budget for the upcoming fiscal year5 to Congress. He is required to submit his annual
budget on or before the first Monday in February.6 Congress has, however, provided
deadline extensions; both statutorily and, sometimes, informally.7
4 The House has an additional subcommittee, Select Intelligence Oversight Panel (select
panel). It, however, does not have jurisdiction over providing spending. The select panel,
instead, makes intelligence funding recommendations to the House Defense Appropriations
Subcommittee, which has jurisdiction over legislation to provide intelligence spending.
5 Congress generally provides spending for fiscal years, in contrast to calendar years.
Federal government fiscal years begin on October 1 and end the following September 30.
FY2007 began on October 1, 2006.
6 31 U.S.C. 1105(a).
7 For information on deadline extensions in presidential transition years, see CRS Report
RS20752, Submission of the President’s Budget in Transition Years, by Robert Keith.

CRS-3
The President recommends spending levels for various programs and agencies
of the federal government in the form of budget authority (or BA) because Congress
provides budget authority instead of cash to agencies. Budget authority is the
authority provided by federal law to incur financial obligations that will result in
immediate or future expenditures (or outlays) involving federal funds. Examples of
financial obligations include entering into contracts to build a submarine or purchase
supplies. The resulting outlays are payments from the Treasury, usually in the form
of checks or electronic funds transfers.
An FY2006 appropriations act, for example, provided $1.6 billion in new
budget authority for FY2006 to the Department of Defense (DOD) to build a nuclear
attack submarine. That is, the act gave DOD legal authority to sign contracts to build
the submarine. The department could not commit the government to pay more than
$1.6 billion. The outlays occur when government payments are made to the
contractor.
An appropriation is a type of budget authority that not only provides the
authority to make obligations, but also gives the agency legal authority to make the
subsequent payments from the Treasury. Appropriations must be obligated in the
fiscal year(s) for which they are provided. Appropriations measures provide new
budget authority (as opposed to previously enacted budget authority).
Not all new budget authority provided for a fiscal year is expended that year.
For example, in the case of construction projects, the outlays may occur over several
years as various stages of the project are completed. In the example, the $1.6 billion
outlays may be spent over four fiscal years:
! FY2006, $0.2 billion;
! FY2007, $0.2 billion;
! FY2008, $0.6 billion; and
! FY2009, $0.6 billion.
In other cases, such as federal employee salaries, the outlays may occur in the same
fiscal year for which the appropriations are provided.
As Congress considers appropriations measures providing new budget authority
for a particular fiscal year, discussions on the resulting outlays only involve
estimates. Data on the actual outlays for a fiscal year are not available until the fiscal
year has ended.
When the President submits his budget to Congress, each agency generally
provides detailed justification materials to the House and Senate appropriations
subcommittees with jurisdiction over its funding.

CRS-4
Congress Adopts Budget Resolution
The Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, as amended,
(the Congressional Budget Act)8 requires Congress to adopt an annual budget
resolution.9 The budget resolution is Congress’s response to the President’s budget.
The budget resolution must cover at least five fiscal years: the upcoming fiscal year
plus the four subsequent fiscal years.
The budget resolution, in part, sets total new budget authority and outlay levels
for each fiscal year covered by the resolution. It also distributes federal spending
among 20 functional categories (such as national defense, agriculture, and
transportation) and sets similar levels for each function.
Within each chamber, the total new budget authority and outlays for each fiscal
year are also distributed among committees with jurisdiction over spending, thereby
setting spending ceilings for each committee (see “Allocations” section below).10
The House and Senate Committees on Appropriations receive ceilings only for the
upcoming fiscal year, because appropriations measures are annual. Once the
appropriations committees receive their spending ceilings, they separately distribute
the funding among their respective subcommittees, providing spending ceilings for
each subcommittee.
The budget resolution is never sent to the President, nor does it become law. It
does not provide budget authority or raise or lower revenues; instead, it is a guide for
the House and Senate as they consider various budget-related bills, including
appropriations and tax measures. Both the House and Senate have established
parliamentary rules to enforce some of these spending ceilings when appropriations
measures are considered on the House or Senate floor, respectively. (For more
details, see “Spending Ceilings for Appropriations Measures” section below).
The Congressional Budget Act provides an April 15 deadline for final
congressional adoption of the budget resolution. However, during the 31 fiscal years
Congress has considered budget resolutions (FY1976-FY2006), Congress frequently
did not meet this deadline. For three of those years (FY1999, FY2003, and FY2005),
Congress never completed a budget resolution.11
8 2 U.S.C. 601-656 (2005). The Congressional Budget Act (Titles I-IX of P.L. 93-344 (88
Stat. 297) has been amended several times. Significant amendments were provided in the
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, P.L. 99-177 (99 Stat. 1037,
1038); Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Reaffirmation Act of 1987, P.L.
100-119 (101 Stat. 754); Budget Enforcement Act of 1990, P.L. 101-508 (104 Stat. 1388-
573 to 1388-630); Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, P.L. 103-66 (107 Stat. 312);
and Budget Enforcement Act of 1997, P.L. 105-33 (111 Stat. 251).
9 Budget resolutions are under the jurisdiction of the House and Senate Committees on the
Budget.
10 The committee ceilings are usually provided in the joint explanatory statement that
accompanies the conference report on the budget resolution.
11 Congress is also not expected to complete the FY2007 budget resolution. For more
information on budget resolutions, see CRS Report RL30297, Congressional Budget
(continued...)

CRS-5
While there is no penalty if the budget resolution is not completed or is tardy,
there may be significant difficulties. First, certain enforceable spending ceilings
associated with the budget resolution are not established until the budget resolution
is completed. Second, under the Congressional Budget Act, the Senate can not
consider appropriations legislation for the upcoming fiscal year until (1) Congress
completes the budget resolution and (2) Senate Committee on Appropriations
receives its spending allocations. Furthermore, a three-fifths vote of all Senators (60
Senators, if there are no vacancies) is required in the Senate to waive this rule or
appeal the presiding officer’s ruling on a point of order under this rule.12
The Congressional Budget Act prohibits House consideration of appropriations
measures for the first fiscal year of the budget resolution until Congress completes
the budget resolution. But, it provides an exception. Even if the budget resolution
is not in place, the House may begin considering most appropriations measures13 after
May 15. No similar exception exists in the Senate.
If Congress delays completion of the annual budget resolution (or does not
complete the resolution), each chamber may adopt a deeming resolution to address
these procedural difficulties.14
Timetable for Consideration of Appropriations Measures
Traditionally, the House of Representatives initiated consideration of
appropriations measures and the Senate subsequently amended the House-passed
bills. For the FY1998 through FY2005 regular appropriations bills,15 the Senate
appropriations subcommittees and committee did not generally wait for the House
bill; instead, they reported original Senate bills. Under this non-traditional approach,
both House and Senate appropriations committees and their subcommittees were
often considering the regular bills simultaneously. The Senate returned to the
traditional practice, however, for the FY2006 and FY2007 regular appropriations
bills.
The House Committee on Appropriations reports the 12 regular appropriations
bills separately to the full House. The committee begins reporting the bills in May
or June, completing all or almost all of them by July or the annual August recess.
11 (...continued)
Resolutions: Selected Statistics and Information Guide, by Bill Heniff Jr. and Justin Murray.
12 2 U.S.C. 634 (2005) and section 403(b)(5) of the Concurrent Resolutions on the Budget
for Fiscal Year 2006, H.Con.Res. 95 (109th Cong.).
13 2 U.S.C. 634 (2005). The House exception applies to regular appropriations bills and
supplemental appropriations measures that provide funding for more than one agency or
purpose (for more information, see “Types of Appropriations Measures” below).
14 For information on deeming resolutions, see “Allocations” section below and CRS Report
RL31443, The “Deeming Resolution:” A Budget Enforcement Tool, by Robert Keith.
15 Of the three types of appropriations measures, regular appropriations bills typically
provide most of the funding. A notable exception is the FY2007 full-year continuing
resolution (P.L. 110-5), which provides funding for nine FY2007 regular appropriations
bills.

CRS-6
Generally, the full House begins consideration of the regular appropriations bills in
May or June as well, passing most by July or the recess.
For FY2006 and FY2007, the Senate appropriations committee reported all or
almost all of the House-passed bills, with its amendments, before the August recess.
For FY2006, the Senate passed about half of the bills before the August recess and
the remaining bills in September and October.16
For half of the past 10 years (FY1998-FY2007), neither chamber passed all the
regular appropriations bills.17 The regular bills that did not pass were generally
funded in omnibus appropriations measures (see “Regular Appropriations Bills”
section below).18
During the fall, the appropriations committees are usually heavily involved in
conferences to resolve differences between the two chambers. Relatively little or no
time is left before the fiscal year begins to resolve what may be wide disparities
between the House and Senate, to say nothing of those between Congress and the
President. Congress is usually faced with the need to enact one or more temporary
continuing resolutions pending the final disposition of the regular appropriations
bills.19
Work of the Appropriations Committees
After the President submits his budget, the House and Senate appropriations
subcommittees hold hearings on the segments of the budget under their jurisdiction.
They focus on the details of the agencies’ justifications, primarily obtaining
testimony from agency officials.
After the hearings have been completed and the House and Senate
appropriations committees have generally received their spending ceilings, the
subcommittees begin to mark up20 the regular bills under their jurisdiction and report
16 The Senate only passed 3 of the 11 FY2007 regular appropriations bills.
17 For FY2003, the Senate did not separately pass 11 regular bills, but the Senate considered
for amendment and passed an omnibus measure that included all 11 bills. For purposes of
this report, the FY2003 bills are, therefore, considered as passed.
18 From FY1998 through FY2005, both the House and Senate considered 13 regular
appropriations bills. Due to a reorganization of the House and Senate committees in 2005,
Congress approved 11 regular bills for FY2006 and FY2007. Nine of the FY2007 regular
bills are packaged in a single measure (P.L. 110-5), which the President enacted on February
15, 2007.
19 For a description of continuing resolutions, see “Continuing Resolutions” section below.
20 The chair usually proposes a draft bill (the chair’s mark). The chair and other
subcommittee members discuss amendments to the draft and may agree to include some
(referred to as marking up the bill). Regular appropriations bills are not introduced prior to
full committee markup. The bill is introduced when the House appropriations committee
reports the bill; a bill number is assigned at that time. House rules allow the House
appropriations committee to originate a bill. In contrast, most House committees do not
(continued...)

CRS-7
them to their respective full committees. Under the traditional practice, which the
Senate resumed for the FY2006 and FY2007 regular bills, each Senate subcommittee
would wait to amend the House-passed bill. Both appropriations committees
consider each of their subcommittee’s recommendations separately. The committees
may adopt amendments to a subcommittee’s recommendations and then report the
bill as amended to their respective floors for action.
House and Senate Floor Action
After the House or Senate appropriations committee reports an appropriations
bill to the House or Senate, respectively, the bill is brought to the floor. At this point,
Representatives or Senators are generally provided an opportunity to propose floor
amendments to the bill.
House. Prior to floor consideration of a regular appropriations bill, the House
generally considers a special rule reported by the House Committee on Rules setting
parameters for floor consideration of the bill.21 If the House adopts the special rule,
it usually considers the appropriations bill immediately.
The House considers the bill in the Committee of the Whole House on the State
of the Union (or Committee of the Whole) of which all Representatives are
members.22 A special rule on an appropriations bill usually provides for one hour of
general debate on the bill. The debate includes opening statements by the chair and
ranking minority member23 of the appropriations subcommittee with jurisdiction over
the regular bill, as well as other interested Representatives.
After the Committee of the Whole debates the bill, it considers amendments.
A regular appropriations bill is generally read for amendment, by paragraph.24
Amendments must meet requirements of the
20 (...continued)
have such authority.
21 Because the regular appropriations bills must be completed in a timely fashion, House
Rule XIII, clause 5, provides that these appropriations bills are privileged. This allows the
House Committee on Appropriations to bring a regular appropriations bill directly to the
floor in contrast to asking the rules committee to report a special rule providing for the
measure’s consideration. The latter method is used for most major bills.
In recent years, the House appropriations committee has usually used the special rule
procedure, however. These special rules typically include waivers of certain parliamentary
rules regarding the consideration of appropriations bills and certain provisions within them.
Special rules may also be used for other purposes, such as restricting floor amendments.
22 House Rule XVIII, clause 3, requires that appropriations measures be considered in the
Committee of the Whole before the House votes on passage of the measures (see CRS
Report 95-563, The Legislative Process on the House Floor: An Introduction, by
Christopher M. Davis).
23 A ranking minority member of a committee or subcommittee is the head of the minority
party members of the particular committee or subcommittee.
24 For more information, see CRS Report 98-995, The Amending Process in the House of
Representatives
, by Christopher M. Davis and Stanley Bach.

CRS-8
! House standing rules and precedents, for example, amendments must
be germane to the bill;
! congressional budget process (see “Spending Ceilings for
Appropriations Measures” section below);
! authorization-appropriation process, which enforces the relationship
between authorization and appropriation measures (see
“Relationship Between the Authorization and Appropriation
Measures” section below); and
! special rule providing for consideration of the particular bill.
If an amendment violates any of these requirements, any Representative may raise
a point of order to that effect. If the presiding officer rules the amendment out of
order, it cannot be considered on the House floor. The special rule may waive any
of these requirements, thereby allowing the House to consider the amendment.
During consideration of individual regular appropriations bills, the House
sometimes sets additional parameters, either by adopting a special rule or by
unanimous consent. That is, the House agrees to the new parameters only if no
Representative objects. For example, the House sometimes agrees to limit debate on
individual amendments by unanimous consent.
After the Committee of the Whole completes consideration of the measure, it
rises (dissolves) and reports the bill with any adopted amendments to the full House.
The House then votes on the adopted amendments and passage. After House
passage, the bill is sent to the Senate.
Senate. The full Senate considers the bill as reported by its appropriations
committee.25 The Senate does not utilize the device of a special rule to set
parameters for consideration of bills. Before taking up the bill, however, or during
its consideration, the Senate sometimes sets parameters by unanimous consent.
When the bill is brought up on the floor, the chair and ranking minority member
of the appropriations subcommittee make opening statements on the contents of the
bill as reported.
Committee and floor amendments to the reported bills must meet requirements
under the Senate standing rules and precedents, congressional budget process,
authorization-appropriation process, as well as requirements agreed to by unanimous
consent. The specifics of the Senate and House requirements differ, including the
waiver procedures.26
25 In cases in which the non-traditional practice is utilized, the Senate Committee on
Appropriations reports a Senate bill and after the full Senate has completed action on it, the
Senate waits for the House to send its bill to the Senate and amends the House-passed bill
with generally a substitute amendment that contains the text of the Senate bill, as amended
on the Senate floor.
26 The Senate may waive these rules either by unanimous consent or, in some cases, by
motion.

CRS-9
The Senate, in contrast to the House, does not consider floor amendments in the
order of the bill. Senators may propose amendments to any portion of the bill at any
time unless the Senate agrees to set limits.
House and Senate Conference Action
Generally, members of the House and Senate appropriations subcommittees
having jurisdiction over a particular regular appropriations bill, and the chair and
ranking minority members of the full committees meet to negotiate over differences
between the House- and Senate-passed bills.27
Under House and Senate rules, the negotiators (or conferees or managers) are
generally required to remain within the scope of the differences between the positions
of the two chambers.28 Their agreement must be within the range established by the
House- and Senate-passed versions. For example, if the House-passed bill
appropriates $3 million for a program and a separate Senate amendment provides $5
million, the conferees must reach an agreement that is within the $3-$5 million range.
However, these rules are not always followed.29
The Senate typically passes a single substitute amendment to each House bill.
In such instances, the conferees must reach agreement on all points of difference
between the House and Senate versions before reporting the conference report in
agreement to both houses. When this occurs, the conferees propose a new conference
substitute for the bill as a whole. The conferees attach a joint explanatory statement
(or managers’ statement) explaining the new substitute.
Usually, the House considers conference reports on appropriations measures
first because it traditionally considers the measures first. The first house to consider
a conference report has the option of voting to recommit the report to the conference
for further consideration, rejecting the conference report, or adopting it. After the
first house adopts the conference report, the conference is automatically disbanded;
therefore, the second house has two options — adopt or reject the conference report.
Conference reports cannot be amended in either the House or Senate.
If the conference report is rejected, or is recommitted by the first house, the
conferees negotiate further over the matters in dispute between the two houses.30 The
27 If the Senate and/or House does not pass a bill, informal negotiations typically take place
on the basis of the reported version of that chamber(s). For example, the provisions of the
House-passed bill and Senate committee-reported bill might be negotiated. Typically, the
compromise is included in a conference report on an omnibus appropriations measure (see
“Regular Appropriations Bill” section below).
28 House Rule XXII, clause 9, and Senate Rule XXVIII, paragraphs 2 and 3.
29 Generally, before the House considers a conference report on an appropriations measure,
it adopts a special rule waiving all points of order against the conference report and its
consideration, including points of order that the conference report goes beyond the scope
of the differences.
30 Technically, if either house rejects the conference report, the two houses normally agree
to further conference, usually appointing the same conferees.

CRS-10
measure cannot be sent to the President until both houses have agreed to the entire
text of the bill.
Presidential Action
After Congress sends the bill to the President, he has 10 days to sign or veto the
measure. If he takes no action, the bill automatically becomes law at the end of the
10-day period. Conversely, if he takes no action when Congress has adjourned, he
may pocket veto the bill.
If the President vetoes the bill, he sends it back to Congress. Congress may
override the veto by a two-thirds vote in both houses. If Congress successfully
overrides the veto, the bill becomes law. If Congress is unsuccessful, the bill dies.
Types of Appropriations Measures
There are three major types appropriations measures: regular appropriations
bills, continuing resolutions, and supplementals. Of the three types, regular
appropriations bills typically provide most of the funding.31
Regular Appropriations Bills
The House and Senate annually consider several regular appropriations
measures. Each House and Senate appropriations subcommittee has jurisdiction over
one regular bill. Due to the House and Senate appropriations committees’ recent
reorganization, therefore, each chamber will consider 12 regular bills.
Regular appropriations bills contain a series of unnumbered paragraphs with
headings; each is generally an account. The basic unit of appropriation is the
account. Under these measures, funding for each department and large independent
agency is distributed among several accounts. Each account, generally, includes
similar programs, projects, or items, such as a “research and development” account
or “salaries and expenses” account. For small agencies, a single account may fund
all of the agency’s activities. These acts typically provide a lump-sum amount for
each of these accounts. A few accounts include a single program, project, or item,
which the appropriations acts fund individually.
In report language,32 the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations
provide more detailed directions to the department and agencies on the distribution
of funding among various activities funded within an account. Funding for most
local projects are included in report language, as opposed to the text of the
appropriations bill.
31 A notable exception is an FY2007 continuing resolution (P.L. 110-5), which provides
funding for nine FY2007 regular appropriations bills through the end of FY2007.
32 Report language refers to the content of committee reports and joint explanatory
statements, which are attached to the back of conference reports.

CRS-11
Appropriations measures may also provide transfer authority.33 Transfers shift
budget authority from one account or fund to another. For example, if the DOD
moved budget authority from the “Aircraft Procurement, Navy” account to the
“Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy” account, that would be a transfer. Agencies
are prohibited from making such transfers without statutory authority.
In contrast, agencies may generally shift budget authority from one activity to
another within an account without such statutory authority; this activity is referred
to as reprogramming.34 The appropriations subcommittees have established
notification and other oversight procedures for the various agencies to follow
regarding reprogramming actions. Generally, these procedures differ with each
subcommittee.
Congress has traditionally considered and approved each regular appropriations
bill separately, but Congress has recently combined bills together. For 18 of the past
31 years (FY1977-FY2007), Congress packaged two or more regular appropriations
bills together in one measure, or, in the case of FY2001, into two measures.35 These
packages are referred to as omnibus measures or mini-bus measures.36
In these cases, Congress typically began consideration of each regular bill
separately, but generally in conference combined some of the bills together. During
conference on a single regular appropriations bill, the conferees typically included
in the conference report final agreements on other outstanding regular appropriations
bills, thereby creating an omnibus or minibus appropriations measure.
Packaging, as Table 1 shows, was used for nine consecutive fiscal years
beginning for FY1980. The first two of those years (FY1980-FY1981) occurred
while President Jimmy Carter was in the White House, and the remaining seven were
during Ronald Reagan’s presidency. Since that time, it has been used nine times —
five during President William Jefferson Clinton’s presidency (FY1996-FY1997 and
FY1999-FY2001) and four while President George W. Bush has been in the White
House (FY2003-FY2005 and FY2007).
In two of the years (FY1987 and FY1988) during Ronald Reagan’s presidency,
all the bills were enacted together, and in two years (FY2003 and FY2007) while
President George W. Bush has been in the White House, all but two bills were
33 Authorization measures may also provide transfer authority. For information on
authorization measures, see “Relationship Between the Authorization and Appropriation
Measures” section below.
34 Transfer authority may be required, however, in cases in which the appropriations act
includes a set aside for a specified activity within an account.
35 The FY2001 Energy and Water Development bill was attached to the FY2001 Veterans
Affairs, Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies bill. The FY2001
Legislative Branch bill and Treasury and General Government bill were attached to the
FY2001 Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies bill.
36 There is no agreed upon definition of minibus or omnibus appropriations measures, but
a minibus appropriations measure generally refers to a measure including a few regular
appropriations bills and an omnibus appropriations measure refers to a measure containing
several regular bills.

CRS-12
enacted together. (From FY1977 through FY2005, Congress annually considered 13
regular appropriations bills and, for FY2006 and FY2007, Congress generally
considered 11 regular bills.)37
Packaging regular appropriations bills can be an efficient means of resolving
outstanding differences within Congress and between Congress and the President.
The negotiators can make more convenient trade-offs between issues among several
bills.
Table 1. Number of Regular Appropriations Bills Packaged in
Omnibus (or Minibus) Measure, FY1977-FY2007
Fiscal
Presidential
Regular Bills in Omnibus
Year
Administration
or Minibus Measure
1977
Gerald Ford
0
1978
Jimmy Carter
0
1979
0
1980
2
1981
5
1982
Ronald Reagan
3
1983
6
1984
3
1985
8
1986
7
1987
13
1988
13
1989
0
1990
George H.W. Bush
0
1991
0
1992
0
1993
0
1994
William Clinton
0
1995
0
1996
5
1997
6
1998
0
1999
8
2000
5
2001
2,3a
2002
George W. Bush
0
2003
11
2004
7
37 During the 2005 reorganization of the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations,
the House committee reduced the number of its subcommittees from 13 to 10 and the Senate
committee reduced its number from 13 to 12. The full House committee had jurisdiction
over one bill. The House, therefore, initially considered 11 regular bills and the Senate
considered 12. During consideration of the appropriations bills, the Senate combined two
bills, resulting in 11 regular bills.

CRS-13
Fiscal
Presidential
Regular Bills in Omnibus
Year
Administration
or Minibus Measure
2005
9
2006
0
2007
9
Sources: U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Appropriations, Budget Estimates,
Etc.
, committee prints, 94th Cong., 2nd sess.-103rd Cong., 2nd sess. (Washington: GPO, 1976-1994);
and U.S. Congress, House, Calendars of the U.S. House of Representatives and History of Legislation,
94th-108th Congresses
(Washington: GPO, 1976-2004).
a. The FY2001 Energy and Water Development bill was attached to the FY2001 Veterans Affairs,
Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies bill. The FY2001 Legislative
Branch bill and Treasury and General Government bill were attached to the FY2001 Labor,
Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies bill.
Continuing Resolutions
Regular appropriations bills expire at the end of the fiscal year. If action on one
or more regular appropriations measures has not been completed by the deadline, the
agencies funded by these bills must cease nonessential activities due to lack of budget
authority. Traditionally, continuing appropriations have been used to maintain
temporary funding to agencies and programs until the regular bills are enacted. Such
appropriations continuing funding are usually provided in a joint resolution, hence
the term continuing resolution (or CR).
In November and again in December 1995, FY1996 continuing resolutions
expired and some regular appropriations bills had not been enacted. As a result,
nonessential activities that would have been funded in those regular bills stopped and
federal workers hired to perform those services did not report for duty.
In 26 of the past 31 years (FY1977-FY2007), Congress and the President did not
complete action on a majority of the regular bills by the start of the fiscal year (see
Table 2). In eight years, they did not finish any of the bills by the deadline. They
completed action on all the bills on schedule only four times: FY1977, FY1989,
FY1995, and FY1997.
On or before the deadline, Congress and the President generally complete action
on an initial continuing resolution that temporarily funds the outstanding regular
appropriations bills. In contrast to funding practices in regular bills (i.e., providing
appropriations for each account), temporary continuing resolutions generally provide
funding by a rate and/or formula. Recently, the continuing resolutions have generally
provided a rate at the levels provided in the previous fiscal year. The initial CR
typically provides temporary funding until a specific date or until the enactment of
the applicable regular appropriations acts, if earlier. Once the initial CR becomes
law, additional interim continuing resolutions are frequently utilized to sequentially
extend the expiration date. These subsequent continuing resolutions sometimes
change the funding methods. Over the past 31 fiscal years, Congress has approved,
on average, four continuing resolutions each year (see Table 2).

CRS-14
Table 2. Regular Appropriations Bills Completed by Deadline
and Number of Continuing Resolutions, FY1977-FY2007
Regular Appropriations
Continuing
Fiscal
Presidential
Bills Became Law by or
Resolutions
Year
Administration
on October 1st
Became Law
1977
Gerald Ford
13
(2a)
1978
Jimmy Carter
9
3
1979
5
1
1980
3
2
1981
1
2
1982
Ronald Reagan
0
4
1983
1
2
1984
4
2
1985
4
5
1986
0
5
1987
0
5
1988
0
5
1989
13
0
1990
George H.W. Bush
1
3
1991
0
5
1992
3
4
1993
1
1
1994
William J. Clinton
2
3
1995
13
0
1996
0
14b
1997
13c
0
1998
1
6
1999
1
6
2000
4
7
2001
2
21
2002
George W. Bush
0
8
2003
0
8
2004
3
5
2005
1
3
2006
2
3
2007
1
4d
Sources: U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Appropriations, Budget Estimates,
Etc.
, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. - 104th Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1976-1995). U.S. Congress,
House, Calendars of the U.S. House of Representatives and History of Legislation, 104th Cong., 1st
sess. - 107th Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 1995-2005).
a. The two CRs did not provide continuing funding for entire regular bills; instead, they provided
funding for selected activities.
b. All measures providing continuing funding are included. However, two of these bills were not
initially appropriations bills. Later, Congress added continuing funding to both.
c. Five regular bills were attached to the FY1997 defense regular act, which became law on September
30. As a result, the FY1997 appropriations process was completed by October 1.
d. The initial FY2007 CR was included in the FY2007 Department of Defense regular appropriations
act (P.L. 109-289, Division B).

CRS-15
Supplementals
Congress frequently considers one or more supplemental appropriations
measures for a fiscal year that provide additional funds for specified activities.
Supplementals may provide funding for unforeseen needs (such as funds to recover
from a hurricane, earthquake or flood); or increase or provide funding for other
activities. These measures, like regular appropriations bills, provide specific
amounts of funding for individual accounts in the bill. Sometimes Congress includes
supplemental appropriations in regular bills and continuing resolutions.
During a calendar year, Congress typically considers, at least
! 12 regular appropriations bills for the fiscal year that begins on
October 1;
! several continuing resolutions for the same fiscal year; and
! one or more supplementals for the previous fiscal year.
Spending Ceilings for Appropriations Measures
Congress established the congressional budget process through which it
annually sets spending ceilings associated with the budget resolution and enforces
those ceilings with parliamentary rules, or points of order, during congressional
consideration of appropriations bills.38
Allocations
As mentioned previously, within each chamber, the total budget authority and
outlays included in the annual budget resolution are distributed among the House and
Senate committees with jurisdiction over spending, including the House and Senate
Committees on Appropriations. Through this allocation process, the budget
resolution sets total spending ceilings for each House and Senate committee (referred
to as the 302(a) allocations).39 Table 3 provides 302(a) allocations to the House
Committee on Appropriations for FY2006.
38 The congressional budget process was established by the Congressional Budget Act,
(Titles I-IX of P.L. 93-344, 88 Stat. 297, 2 U.S.C. 601-656 (2005). The act has been
amended several times. Significant amendments were provided in the Balanced Budget and
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, P.L. 99-177 (99 Stat. 1037, 1038); Balanced
Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Reaffirmation Act of 1987, P.L. 100-119 (101 Stat.
754); Budget Enforcement Act of 1990, P.L. 101-508 (104 Stat. 1388-573 to 1388-630);
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, P.L. 103-66 (107 Stat. 312); and Budget
Enforcement Act of 1997, P.L. 105-33 (111 Stat. 251).
39 This refers to section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act. Typically, these are
provided in the joint explanatory statement that accompanies the conference report on the
budget resolution.

CRS-16
Table 3. House Committee on Appropriations’
302(a) Allocations for FY2006
(in billions of dollars)
Spending Category
Budget Authority
Outlays
Discretionary
843.020
916.836
Mandatory
528.504
510.843
Source: U.S. Congress, Conference Committees, 2005, Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for
Fiscal Year 2006
, conference report to accompany H.Con.Res. 95, H.Rept. 109-62, 109th Cong., 1st
sess. (Washington: GPO, 2006), p. 86.
Table 3 includes allocations for discretionary spending and mandatory
spending. Congress divides budget authority and the resulting outlays into two
categories: discretionary spending and mandatory spending (including net interest40).
Discretionary spending is controlled by the annual appropriations acts, which are
under the jurisdiction of the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations. In
contrast, mandatory spending is controlled by authorization (or legislative) acts under
the jurisdiction of the authorization (or legislative) committees (principally the House
Committee on Ways and Means and Senate Committee on Finance).41
Appropriations measures include all the discretionary spending and some of the
mandatory spending.
Discretionary spending provides funds for a wide variety of activities, such as
those described in the “Introduction” above, whereas mandatory spending primarily
funds entitlement programs42 as well as other mandatory spending programs. Of total
actual outlays for FY2006, only 38% was discretionary spending; the remaining 62%
was mandatory spending (9% was net interest).
40 “In the federal budget, net interest comprises the government’s interest payments on debt
held by the public ... offset by interest income that the government receives on loans and
cash balances and by earnings of the National Railroad Retirement Investment Trust.” U.S.
Congressional Budget Office, The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2007 to
2016
(Washington: GPO, 2006), p. 167.
41 Most standing committees are legislative committees, such as the House Committee on
Armed Services and the Senate Committee on the Judiciary. For more information, see
“Relationship Between Authorization and Appropriation Measures” section below.
42 The Congressional Budget Office defines entitlement as:
A legal obligation of the federal government to make payments to a person,
group of people, business, unit of government, or similar entity that meets the
eligibility criteria set in law and for which the budget authority is not provided
in advance in an appropriation act. Spending for entitlement programs is
controlled through the eligibility criteria and benefit or payment rules.
Major entitlement programs include Social Security and Medicare. U.S. Congressional
Budget Office, pp. 162-163.

CRS-17
Regarding the distribution of discretionary spending outlays for FY2006, 51%
of the outlays was for defense activities, 45% for domestic activities, and 4% for
international activities.
The mandatory spending provided in appropriations measures is predominantly
for entitlement programs, referred to as appropriated entitlements. Appropriated
entitlements are funded through a two-step process. First, authorizing legislation
becomes law that sets program parameters (through eligibility requirements and
benefit levels, for example); then the appropriations committees must provide the
budget authority needed to meet the commitment. The appropriations committees
have little control over the amount of budget authority provided, since the amount
needed is the result of previously enacted commitments in legislative law.43
Instead of directly controlling outlays, Congress controls discretionary spending
by setting levels of new budget authority for specific activities, programs, and
agencies in annual appropriations measures. Congress could have, for example,
provided $2.6 billion in new budget authority to build the nuclear attack submarine,
mentioned earlier, instead of $1.6 billion.
Congress also controls mandatory spending by controlling budget authority. It
does not, however, generally control this form of budget authority by setting specific
spending levels. It controls mandatory spending by establishing parameters for
government commitments in permanent law, such as Social Security benefit levels
and eligibility requirements.
After the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations receive their 302(a)
allocations, they separately divide their allocations among their subcommittees,
providing each subcommittee with a ceiling. These subdivisions are referred to as
the 302(b) allocations.44 Table 4 provides the House Committee on Appropriations’
initial 302(b) allocations of discretionary, mandatory, and total spending for FY2006.
Making 302(b) allocations is within the jurisdiction of the House and Senate
appropriations committees, and they typically make revisions to reflect action on the
appropriations bills.
43 Some mandatory spending is provided through a one-step process. The authorization act
sets the program parameters and provides the budget authority.
44 This refers to section 302(b) of the Congressional Budget Act.

CRS-18
Table 4. Initial House Appropriations Committee’s 302(b)
Allocations for FY2006
(in billions of dollars)
Subcommittee
Discretionary
Mandatory
Total
Agriculture
New Budget Authority
16.832
69.535
86.367
Outlays
18.691
50.456
69.147
Defense
New Budget Authority
363.440
0.245
363.685
Outlays
372.696
0.245
372.941
Energy and Water Development
New Budget Authority
29.746
29.746
Outlays
30.236
30.236
Foreign Operations
New Budget Authority
20.270
0.042
20.312
Outlays
25.380
0.042
25.422
Homeland Security
New Budget Authority
30.846
0.931
31.777
Outlays
33.233
0.924
34.157
Interior and Environment
New Budget Authority
26.107
0.054
26.161
Outlays
27.500
0.060
27.560
Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education
New Budget Authority
142.514
402.591
545.105
Outlays
143.802
404.083
547.885
(Legislative Branch)a
New Budget Authority
3.719
0.118
3.837
Outlays
3.734
0.117
3.851
Military Quality of Life and Veterans Affairs
New Budget Authority
85.158
35.640
120.798
Outlays
81.651
35.570
117.221
Science, State, Justice, and Commerce
New Budget Authority
57.453
0.361
57.814
Outlays
58.856
0.373
59.229
Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban
Development, the Judiciary, and District of Columbia
New Budget Authority
66.935
18.987
85.922
Outlays
120.908
18.973
139.881
Totalb
New Budget Authority
843.020
528.504
1,371.524
Outlays
916.836
510.843
1,427.679
Source: U.S. Congress, House Committee on Appropriations, Report on the Suballocation to Budget Allocations for
Fiscal Year 2006
, 109th Cong., 1st sess. (Washington: GPO, 2005), pp. 2-3.
a. During the 109th Congress, the House Committee on Appropriations had jurisdiction over Legislative Branch funding,
instead of a subcommittee. The full committee, therefore, received 302(b) allocations for those activities.
b. The committee also set aside a small full committee allowance of $0.149 billion in discretionary outlays.

CRS-19
The spending ceilings associated with the annual budget resolution that apply
to appropriations measures are generally for a single fiscal year (the upcoming fiscal
year), since appropriations measures are annual.45 If the budget resolution is
significantly delayed (or is never completed), there are no total spending ceilings,
302(a) allocations, or 302(b) allocations to enforce until the budget resolution is
completed. In such instances, the House and Senate have often adopted separate
deeming resolutions providing, at least, temporary 302(a) allocations, thereby,
establishing some enforceable spending ceilings.46
Since Congress was not expected to adopt a FY2007 budget resolution, both the
House and Senate adopted separate deeming resolutions last year. The House
adopted a special rule47 that, in part, deemed the House-adopted FY2007 budget
resolution48 and accompanying committee report in effect for enforcement purposes.
As a result, the FY2007 total spending ceilings and 302(a) allocations (and therefore,
subsequent 302(b) allocations) are in effect.49 The Senate included in a FY2006
supplemental appropriations act a deeming provision that, in part, set FY2007 302(a)
allocations for the Senate Committee on Appropriations.50
Enforcement
Certain spending ceilings associated with the budget resolution are enforced
through points of order raised on the House and Senate floors when the
appropriations measures are considered. These points of order are not self-enforcing.
A Representative or Senator must raise a point of order that a measure, amendment,
or conference report violates a specific rule. Generally, if a Member raises a point
of order below and the presiding officer rules that the measure, amendment, or
conference report violates the parliamentary rule, it may not be considered on the
floor.
45 In contrast, spending ceilings associated with the budget resolution that apply to
legislative measures are generally provided for several fiscal years.
46 For more information, see CRS Report RL31443, The “Deeming Resolution:” A Budget
Enforcement Tool
, by Robert Keith.
47 H.Res. 818 (109th Cong.), section 2.
48 H.Con.Res. 376 (109th Cong.).
49 This special rule expired with adjournment sine die of the 109th Congress. On January 5,
2007, the House adopted Title V of H.Res. 6 (110th Cong.) which, in part, extends the
effectiveness of the FY2007 budget resolution until Congress completes the FY2008 budget
resolution (see sec. 511(a)(4). Each title of H.Res. 6 was considered and adopted under a
division of the question.
50 P.L. 109-234, section 7035(a). The FY2007 allocations are in effect for the 110th
Congress.

CRS-20
House. Two Congressional Budget Act points of order, 302(f) and 311(a),51
as well as a separate order in the House52 are available to enforce certain spending
ceilings associated with the annual budget resolution. The Congressional Budget Act
points of order apply to committee-reported appropriations bills,53 certain non-
reported appropriations bills,54 amendments, and conference reports to these
measures; they do not apply to appropriations bills amended on the floor. The
separate order, however, provides a procedure to enforce the 302(b) ceilings for
certain amended appropriations measures during the 110th Congress.
The 302(f) point of order prohibits floor consideration of such legislation55 and
conference reports that provide budget authority exceeding the committee or
subcommittee allocations of new budget authority (the 302(a) or 302(b) allocations,
respectively). In effect, this point of order applies to total discretionary spending
(and any mandatory spending changes initiated on the appropriations measures).56
For example, the reported FY2006 Agriculture regular appropriations bill could not
have exceeded the Agriculture subcommittee’s total discretionary spending allocation
for FY2006 — $16.832 billion — provided in Table 4.57
51 These refer to sections 302(f) and 311(a), respectively, of the Congressional Budget Act
(see also, section 403 of H.Res. 6 (110th Cong.).
52 A separate order is a provision that is not a part of the House Standing Rules, but is
provided under the rulemaking authority of the House. Section 511(a)(5) of H.Res. 6 (110th
Cong.) established the separate order, which is identical to a separate order established in
the previous Congress (section 2 of H.Res. 248 (109th Cong.).
53 The House Committee on Appropriations almost always reports regular and major
supplemental appropriations bills. It, however, does not generally report continuing
resolutions.
54 If a special rule expedites consideration of a measure by ordering the previous question
directly to passage, the form of the measure considered is subject to the points of order.
Some continuing resolutions are considered by this procedure.
55 In this context, legislation refers the committee-reported and non-committee reported bills
as well as amendments to those bills. This definition contrasts with “legislation” as it is
defined for purposes of the authorization-appropriation process (see “Relationship Between
Authorization and Appropriation Measures” below).
56 It does not affect increased mandatory spending that the appropriators are required to
provide. For example, if the House Committee on Appropriations is required to increase
new budget authority for unemployment compensation due to a recession, such budget
authority would not be subject to the point of order.
57 Although the 302(f) point of order in the House enforces new budget authority ceilings,
under House rules certain offset amendments must remain within the total new budget
authority and outlay levels provided in the bill. Due to the 302(f) point of order, Members
frequently must decrease budget authority in a bill for certain activities in order to finance
increases in funding for other activities in order to stay within the 302(a) or 302(b)
allocations (the decreases are referred to as offsets.) An amendment providing both the
increases and decreases is referred to as an offset amendment. Frequently, the increases and
offsets Members prefer are not located in the same place in the bill, and the affected
segments would normally be considered at different times on the House floor.
Offset amendments that amend the text of the bill in more than one place must remain
within the total new budget authority and outlay levels provided in the bill (House Rule
(continued...)

CRS-21
The 311(a) point of order prohibits floor consideration of such legislation or
conference reports that would exceed the total new budget authority or outlay ceilings
in the budget resolution. As Congress acts on various spending bills for a fiscal year,
the amount of total new budget authority and the resulting outlays accumulate and
the budget resolution ceilings are eventually reached. An appropriations bill that
would go over either ceiling is subject to the 311(a) point of order. If all spending
bills stay within the applicable committee spending ceilings, a bill will not exceed the
total ceilings established in the budget resolution. However, in the past, some
funding bills have exceeded their committee ceilings, thereby making the last
spending bills considered subject to the 311(a) point of order. In the House, the
Fazio Exception58 exempts certain appropriations from the 311(a) point of order. If
the House Committee on Appropriations does not exceed its total committee
allocations, then the appropriations measures, amendments, and conference reports
are exempt from the 311(a) point of order.59
For the 110th Congress, the separate order extends enforcement of 302(b)
allocations to appropriations bills amended in the Committee of the Whole.60
Regular appropriations bills and major supplemental appropriations measures are
typically considered for amendment in the Committee of the Whole. The order
generally establishes a point of order in the Committee of the Whole against a motion
to rise and report to the House an appropriations bill that, as amended, exceeds the
applicable 302(b) allocation in new budget authority. If the Presiding Officer
sustains a point of order against such a motion, the bill does not fall or automatically
remain in the Committee of the Whole; instead, the Committee of the Whole decides,
by a vote, whether to adopt the motion even though the amended measure exceeds
the allocation.61
57 (...continued)
XXI, clause 2(f)). An offset amendment added at the end of a bill that indirectly effects
earlier provisions in the bill would not fall under the procedure provided in Rule XXI,
clause 2(f). However it would still be subject to requirements in section 302. That is, it may
not cause the bill to exceed new budget authority allocations made pursuant to 302(a) or (b).
(For more information, see CRS Report RL31055, House Offset Amendments to
Appropriations Bills: Procedural Considerations
, by Sandy Streeter.)
58 The title of the exception refers to former Representative Victor Herbert Fazio, Jr., (CA).
59 Section 311(c) of the Congressional Budget Act, as amended.
60 For general information on the Committee of the Whole, see “House and Senate Floor
Action, House” above and, for more detailed information, see CRS Report RL32200,
Debate, Motions, and Other Actions in the Committee of the Whole, by Bill Heniff Jr. and
Elizabeth Rybicki; and CRS Report RS20147, Committee of the Whole: An Introduction, by
Judy Schneider.
61 If the committee votes against “rising,” it may consider one proper amendment, such as
an amendment reducing funds in the bill to bring it into compliance with the allocation. The
separate order also provides an up-or-down vote on the amendment. Only one such point
of order may be raised against a measure.
Special rules providing for the consideration of bills routinely preclude a motion to rise
and report by ordering the Committee of the Whole to rise and report after all amendments
have been considered. Since adoption of the original separate order (H.Res. 248 (109th
Cong.) on April 28, 2005, almost all special rules providing for the consideration of regular
(continued...)

CRS-22
Significantly, the separate order does not apply to a motion to rise and report
proposed after the bill has been read for amendment, if offered by the majority leader
(or a designee).
The House may waive or suspend the three points of order by adopting, by
majority vote, a special rule waiving the particular point of order prior to floor
consideration of the appropriations legislation.
Senate. Two points of order, 302(f) and 311(a),62 enforce spending ceilings
that affect appropriations measures. The Senate versions of these rules vary from the
House versions. In the Senate, these points of order apply to all appropriations
measures, both those reported by the committee and amended on the floor, as well
as amendments, motions, and conferences reports to these measures.
The Senate 302(f) point of order prohibits floor consideration of legislation,
motions, and conference reports that exceed the subcommittee allocations in new
budget authority and total outlays. In contrast to the House, it does not enforce the
302(a) allocations. As in the House, this point of order, in effect, applies to total
discretionary spending (and any mandatory spending changes initiated on the
appropriations measures). The 311(a) point of order in the Senate is similar to the
House version; however, it does not include the Fazio Exception.
Senators may make motions to waive these points of order at the time the issue
is raised. Currently, a vote of three-fifths of all Senators (60 Senators, if there are no
vacancies) is required to approve a waiver motion for any of these points of order.
A vote to appeal the presiding officer’s ruling also requires three-fifths vote of all
Senators. These super-majority vote requirements expire on September 30, 2010.
Emergency Spending. Since 1990, both the House and Senate have,
generally, developed procedures to exempt from the above spending ceilings funding
for emergencies. These procedures have evolved; now, budget authority (and
resulting outlays) designated as emergency spending in appropriations measures,
amendments, and conference reports are exempt.63
For FY2007, the House also exempts spending in appropriations legislation and
conference reports that are designated “for contingency operations directly related to
61 (...continued)
appropriations bills have not included such an order, thereby, providing an opportunity for
Representatives to raise this point of order.
62 These refer to sections 302(f) and 311(a), respectively, of the Congressional Budget Act.
63 For current House procedures, see H.Con.Res. 376 (109th Cong.), as adopted by the
House, sec. 402 and title V. For current Senate procedures, see U.S. Congress, Conference
Committees, 2005, Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2006, conference
report to accompany H.Con.Res. 95, 109th Cong., 1st sess., H.Rept. 109-62 (Washington:
GPO, 2005), sec. 402; P.L. 109-234, sec. 7035; and S.Con.Res. 83 (109th Cong.), as adopted
by the Senate, sec. 402. For general information on rules regarding emergency designations,
see CRS Report RS21035, Emergency Spending: Statutory and Congressional Rules, by
James V. Saturno.

CRS-23
the global war on terrorism, and other unanticipated defense-related operations”
(contingency operations).
In practice, House emergency and contingency operations designations may be
included in the committee-reported bills and conference reports, but not in floor
amendments. Under House precedents, these designations are considered legislation
on an appropriations bill, which are prohibited.64 The House, sometimes, adopts a
special rule waiving this point of order against emergency and contingency
operations designations in the reported bills and conference reports, but not such
provisions in floor amendments.
By contrast, under Senate precedents such designations are not considered
legislation on an appropriations bill. Emergency designations may be included in
Senate floor amendments as well as committee amendments, reported bills, amended
bills, and conference reports.
Emergency designations for non-defense spending are, however, subject to
another point of order.65 If this point of order is raised and sustained, the emergency
designation is stricken and the funding is then subject to the points of order enforcing
the spending ceilings. In order to waive this point of order, a three-fifths vote of all
Senators is required, thereby requiring super-majority support. A vote to appeal the
presiding officer’s ruling also requires three-fifths vote of all Senators.
For FY2007, both chambers have established different ceilings on designated-
funding exemptions. Under House procedures, there is a $6.450 billion limit on non-
defense discretionary spending, any additional non-defense discretionary designated
funds may only be exempt if approved generally by the House Committee on the
Budget.66 There is no House ceiling on defense spending, “contingency operations.”
The Senate, by contrast, set a FY2007 total limit of $86.3 billion on all funds
designated as an emergency, both defense and non-defense spending.67
64 Specifically, special budgetary designations pursuant to the concurrent resolution on the
budget
are considered “legislation on an appropriations bill.” Special budgetary
designations include provisions (1) designating funds as “making appropriations for
contingency operations directly related to the global war on terrorism and other
unanticipated defense-related operations” under sec. 402 of H.Con.Res 376 (109th Cong.);
and (2) designating funds as “an emergency requirement” under title v of the same
resolution. For more information on legislation on an appropriations bill, see “Relationship
Between Authorization and Appropriation Measures” section below.
65 H.Con.Res. 95 (109th Congress), sec. 402(b).
66 H.Con.Res. 376 (109th Cong.), as adopted by the House, sec. 402 and title V.
67 P.L. 109-234, sec. 7035; and S.Con.Res. 83 (109th Cong.), sec. 402, as adopted by the
Senate.

CRS-24
Relationship Between Authorization and
Appropriation Measures
Congress has established an authorization-appropriation process that provides
for two separate types of measures — authorization measures and appropriation
measures. These bills perform different functions and are to be considered in
sequence. First, the authorization measure is considered and then the appropriation
measure.
Authorization acts establish, continue, or modify agencies or programs. For
example, an authorization act may establish or modify programs within the
Department of Defense. The authorization act also authorizes subsequent
appropriations for specific agencies and programs, frequently setting spending
ceilings for them. These authorization of appropriations provisions may be
permanent, annual, or multi-year authorizations. Annual and multi-year provisions
require re-authorizations when they expire. Congress is not required to provide
appropriations for an authorized discretionary spending program.
Authorization measures are under the jurisdiction of legislative committees such
as the House Committees on Agriculture and Homeland Security, or the Senate
Committees on Armed Services and the Judiciary. Most congressional committees
are legislative committees.68 The House and Senate Committees on Appropriations,
however, are not. Appropriations measures provide new budget authority for the
program, activity, or agency previously authorized.
The authorization-appropriation process enforces separation of these functions
into different measures by separating committee jurisdiction over authorization and
appropriations bills and with points of order prohibiting certain provisions in
appropriations measures.69 The House and Senate prohibit, in varying degrees,
language in appropriations bills providing unauthorized appropriations or legislation
on an appropriations bill (or legislation). An unauthorized appropriation is new
budget authority in an appropriations measure (amendment or conference report) for
agencies or programs whose authorization has expired or was never authorized, or
whose budget authority exceeds the ceiling authorized. Legislation refers to language
in appropriations measures that change existing law, such as establishing new law,
or amending or repealing current law. Legislation is under the jurisdiction of the
authorizing committees (also called legislative committees).
House rules prohibit unauthorized appropriations and legislation in regular
appropriations bills and supplemental appropriations measures, which provide funds
for more than one purpose or agency (referred to in the House as general
appropriations bills
). However, House rules do not prohibit such provisions in
68 The House Ways and Means Committee and Senate Finance Committee have jurisdiction
over some authorization measures, all revenue measures, and some mandatory spending
measures.
69 House Rule XXI, clause 2; House Rule XXII, clause 5; and Senate Rule XVI. House rules
also prohibit appropriations in authorization measures, amendments, or conference reports
(Rule XXI, clause 4 and House Rule XXII, clause 5).

CRS-25
continuing resolutions. The House prohibition applies to bills reported by the House
Appropriations Committee, amendments, and conference reports. The House may
adopt a special rule waiving this rule prior to floor consideration of the
appropriations bill or conference report.70 The point of order applies to the text of the
bills, amendments, and conference reports; not the committee report or the joint
explanatory statement.
In the Senate, unauthorized appropriations and legislation are treated differently.
The Senate rule regarding such language applies to regular bills, supplementals which
provide funds for more than one purpose or agency, and continuing resolutions
(referred to in the Senate as general appropriations bills).
This Senate rule applies only to amendments to general appropriations bills,
such as, those
! introduced on the Senate floor;
! reported by the Senate Appropriations Committee to the House-
passed measure; or
! proposed as a substitute for the House-passed text.
The rule does not apply to provisions in Senate bills or conference reports.71 For
example, this rule did not apply to provisions in S. 1005, the FY1998 Defense
appropriations bill, as reported by the Senate Appropriations Committee. But it did
apply to provisions in H.R. 2107, the FY1998 Interior bill, as reported by the Senate
Appropriations Committee, since this version of the bill consisted of amendments to
the House-passed bill.72 Recently, the Senate has adopted procedures, on a bill-by-
bill basis, that make these points of order applicable to the provisions of Senate bills.
The Senate rule is less restrictive than the House on unauthorized
appropriations. For example, the Senate Appropriations Committee may report
committee amendments containing unauthorized appropriations. An appropriation
is considered authorized if the Senate previously passes the authorization bill during
the same session of Congress. In contrast, in the House, the authorization must be
in law.
Although the Senate rule generally prohibits unauthorized appropriations in non-
committee amendments, Senators rarely raise this point of order because of
exceptions to the rule.
70 The special rule may provide a waiver for specified provisions or all provisions in the bill
that are subject to the point of order. The special rule may also provide a waiver for specific
amendments. Special rules typically waive points of order against all provisions in all
conference reports on general appropriations measures.
71 The rule also does not apply to language in committee reports or joint explanatory
statements.
72 The Senate rule reflects Senate practices at the time the rule was established. The Senate
Appropriations Committee traditionally reported numerous amendments to the House-
passed appropriations bill, instead of reporting an original Senate bill. Therefore, the rule’s
prohibition only applies to amendments, both committee and floor amendments.

CRS-26
The Senate rule prohibits legislation in both Senate Appropriations Committee
amendments and non-committee amendments.73 It also prohibits non-germane
amendments.
The division between an authorization and an appropriation is limited to
congressional consideration of appropriations measures. If unauthorized
appropriations or legislation remain in a measure as enacted, either because no one
raised a point of order or the House or Senate waived the rules, the provision will
have the force of law. Again, enacted unauthorized appropriations are generally
available for obligation or expenditure.
Rescissions
Rescissions cancel previously enacted budget authority. To continue the earlier
example, after Congress enacted the $1.6 billion to construct the submarine, it could
enact legislation canceling the budget authority prior to its obligation. Rescissions
are an expression of changed or differing priorities. They may also be used to offset
increases in budget authority for other activities.
The President may recommend rescissions to Congress, but it is up to Congress
to act on them. Under Title X of the Congressional Budget Act,74 Congress must
enact a bill approving the President’s rescissions within 45 days of continuous
session of Congress
or the budget authority must be spent.
In practice, this usually means that funds proposed for rescission not approved
by Congress must be made available for obligation after about 60 calendar days,
although the period can extend to 75 days or longer.75
In response to the President’s recommendation, Congress may decide not to
approve the amount specified by the President, approve the total amount, or approve
a different amount. In 2005, the President requested a rescission of $106 million
from the Department of Defense (DOD), Operations and Maintenance, Defense-Wide
account and $48.6 million from DOD, Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation,
Army account. Congress provided a rescission of $80 million from the first account
in the Department of Defense, Emergency Supplemental Appropriations to Address
73 Under Senate precedents, an amendment containing legislation may be considered if it is
germane to language in the House-passed appropriations bill. That is, if the House opens
the door by including a legislative provision in an appropriations bill, the Senate has an
“inherent right” to amend it. However, if the Senate considers an original Senate bill, rather
than the House-passed bill with amendments, there is no House language to which the
legislative provision could be germane. Therefore, the defense of germaneness is not
available.
74 Title X is referred to as the Impoundment Control Act.
75 CRS Report RL33635, Item Veto and Expanded Impoundment Proposals: Legislative
History and Current Status
, by Virginia A. McMurtry.

CRS-27
Hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico, and Pandemic Influenza Act, 2006.76 The act did
not provide a rescission from the second account.
Congress may also initiate rescissions. In the above act, Congress also initiated
a rescission of $10 million from the Department of State, Diplomatic and Consular
Programs account.
As budget authority providing the funding must be enacted into law, so, too, a
rescission canceling the budget authority must be enacted into law. Rescissions can
be included in either separate rescission measures or any of the three types of
appropriations measures.
For Additional Reading
CRS Products
CRS Report RL32153. Across-the-Board Spending Cuts in Omnibus Appropriations
Acts, by Robert Keith.
CRS Report RS20441. Advance Appropriations, Forward Funding, and Advance
Funding, by Sandy Streeter.
CRS Report 98-648. Appropriations Bills: What are “General Provisions?,” by
Sandy Streeter.
CRS Report 98-558. Appropriations Bills: What is Report Language?, by Sandy
Streeter.
CRS Report RS20095. The Congressional Budget Process: A Brief Overview, by
James V. Saturno.
CRS Report RL33122. Congressional Budget Resolutions: Revisions and
Adjustments, by Robert Keith.
CRS Report RL30297. Congressional Budget Resolutions: Selected Statistics and
Information Guide, by Bill Heniff Jr. and Justin Murray.
CRS Report RL30343. Continuing Appropriations Acts: Brief Overview of Recent
Practices, by Sandy Streeter.
CRS Report RL31443. The “Deeming Resolution:” A Budget Enforcement Tool, by
Robert Keith.
CRS Report RL32614. Duration of Continuing Resolutions in Recent Years, by
Robert Keith.
76 P.L. 109-148.

CRS-28
CRS Report RL33397, Earmark Reform Proposals: Analysis of Latest Versions of
S. 2349 and H.R. 4975, by Sandy Streeter.
CRS Report RS21035. Emergency Spending: Statutory and Congressional Rules,
by James V. Saturno.
CRS Report RL30619. Examples of Legislative Provisions in Omnibus
Appropriations Acts, by Robert Keith.
CRS Report RS20348. Federal Funding Gaps: A Brief Overview, by Robert Keith.
CRS Report RL31055. House Offset Amendments to Appropriations Bills:
Procedural Considerations, by Sandy Streeter.
CRS Report 98-721. Introduction to the Federal Budget Process, by Robert Keith
and Allen Schick.
CRS Report 95-563. The Legislative Process on the House Floor: An Introduction,
by Christopher M. Davis.
CRS Report 96-548. The Legislative Process on the Senate Floor: An Introduction,
by Valerie Heitshusen.
CRS Report RL32473. Omnibus Appropriations Acts: Overview of Recent
Practices, by Robert Keith.
CRS Report 97-865. Points of Order in the Congressional Budget Process, by
James V. Saturno.
CRS Report RS20752. Submission of the President’s Budget in Transition Years,
by Robert Keith.
Congressional Documents
U.S. Congress. House. Constitution, Jefferson’s Manual, and Rules of the House
of Representatives, 109th Congress (or House Manual), H.Doc. 108-241, 108th
Congress, 2nd session (Washington: GPO, 2005).
——. House Practice: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the
House. 108th Congress, 1st session (Washington: GPO, 2003).
U.S. Congress. Senate. Riddick’s Senate Procedure: Precedents and Practices, S.
Doc. 101-28, 101st Congress, 2nd sess., prepared by Floyd M. Riddick and Alan
S. Frumin (Washington: GPO, 1992).
U.S. Congress. Senate. Standing Rules of the Senate, S.Doc. 106-15, 106th
Congress, 2nd session (Washington: GPO, 2000).

CRS-29
Selected Websites
Cannon’s Precedents (House)
[http://www.gpo.gov/congress/house/precedents/cannons/srchcan.html]
Constitution, Jefferson’s Manual, and Rules of the House of Representatives, 109th
Congress (or House Manual)
[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/hrm/browse_109.html]
CRS Guides to Congressional Processes: Federal Budget Process
[http://www.crs.gov/products/guides/budget/index/BudgetIndex.shtml]
Deschler’s Precedents of the U.S. House of Representatives
[http://www.gpo.gov/congress/house/precedents/srchdeschler.html]
Hinds’ Precedents (House)
[http://www.gpo.gov/congress/house/precedents/hinds/hinds.html]
The House Practice: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the House
[http://www.gpoaccess.gov/hpractice/browse.html]
Riddick’s Senate Procedure: Precedents and Practices
[http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/riddick/]
Standing Rules of the Senate
[http://rules.senate.gov/senaterules/standingrules.txt]