Order Code 94-971 EPW
Federal Employees: Pay and Pension
Increases Since 1969
Updated January 25, 2007
Patrick Purcell
Specialist in Social Legislation
Domestic Social Policy Division

---

Federal Employees:
Pay and Pension Increases Since 1969
Summary
Pay increases for current federal employees and cost-of-living adjustments
(COLAs) for retired federal employees often differ because they are based on
changes in different economic variables. Increases in pay for civilian federal workers
are indexed to wage and salary increases in the private-sector, as measured by the
Employment Cost Index (ECI), whereas federal retirement and disability benefits are
indexed to price increases as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Both the
ECI and the CPI are calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S.
Department of Labor.
Under the terms of the Federal Employees’ Pay Comparability Act of 1990 (P.L.
101-509), pay for civilian federal employees is adjusted each year to keep the salaries
of federal workers competitive with comparable occupations in the private sector.
The annual increases in federal employee pay are based on changes in the cash
compensation paid to workers in the private sector, as measured by the ECI. Under
certain circumstances, the President may limit the annual increase in federal pay by
executive order. Federal law also requires Social Security benefits and the pensions
paid to retired federal employees to be adjusted each year. The COLAs for both
Social Security and civil service pensions are based on the rate of inflation as
measured by the CPI.
Congress has linked increases in federal pay to the ECI so that wages for federal
employees will remain competitive with wages paid by firms in the private sector.
Congress has linked COLAs for Social Security and federal retirement benefits to the
rate of increase in the prices of goods and services in order to protect retirement
income from losing purchasing power through the effects of inflation. In general,
wage increases reflect both improvements in the productivity of labor and increases
in the general level of prices in the economy. Consequently, when measured over
long periods of time, wages tend to rise faster than prices. Because COLAs for
retirees do not reflect increases in the productivity of people who are still in the work
force, COLAs do not make retirees financially better off. COLAs merely protect
retirees from becoming financially worse-off as prices rise over time.
Increases in retirement benefits for retired federal employees were first linked
to the CPI by law in 1962. Increases in Social Security benefits have been linked by
law to changes in the CPI since 1973. Before then, Congress periodically adjusted
Social Security benefits through legislation. Congress chose to tie increases in these
benefits to the CPI in order to make the process less subject to political influences.
The overall price level as measured by the CPI was 434% higher in 2006 than it was
in 1969. As of January 2007, federal civil service retirement benefits have risen by
451% since 1969, while Social Security benefits have risen by 570%. Average wages
among all workers in the economy have risen by 584% since 1969. Salaries for
civilian federal employees have increased by 381% since 1969, and the salaries of
Members of Congress have increased by 288%.
This report is updated annually.

---

Contents
COLAs Versus Pay Increases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
How to Use the Benefit and Pay Increase Table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Procedures for Determining Increases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Social Security and Civil Service Retirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Federal Civil Service Pay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
Federal Pay Raises for Within-grade Step Increases and Promotions . . 5
Pay for Members of Congress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Average Annual Wages and Salaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Price Increases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
List of Tables
Table 1. Increases in Social Security Benefits, Federal Civilian Pensions,
Federal Pay, Congressional Pay, National Average Wages, and
Consumer Prices, 1969 to 2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

---

Federal Employees:
Pay and Pension Increases Since 1969
Under the terms of the Federal Employees’ Pay Comparability Act of 1990 (P.L.
101-509), pay for civilian federal employees is adjusted each year to keep the salaries
of federal workers competitive with comparable occupations in the private sector.
The annual increases in federal employee pay are based on changes in the cash
compensation paid to workers in the private sector, as measured by the Employment
Cost Index (ECI). Under certain circumstances, the President may limit the annual
increase in federal pay by executive order. Federal law also requires Social Security
benefits and the pensions paid to retired federal employees to be adjusted each year.
The cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) both for Social Security and civil service
pensions are based on the rate of inflation as measured by the Consumer Price Index
(CPI). Table 1 shows the pay increases since 1969 for federal employees and
Members of Congress and COLAs made to Social Security benefits and federal civil
service pensions.1
Two national economic indexes also are displayed in Table 1 to provide a basis
for comparison with the benefit and pay increases. These are the average annual
change in the wages of all workers in the United States, as computed by the Social
Security Administration, and the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners
(CPI-W), a price index computed by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
COLAs Versus Pay Increases
Pay increases for current federal workers and cost-of-living adjustments
(COLAs) for retired or disabled federal workers often differ because they are based
on changes in different economic variables. Pay increases for federal workers are
based on changes in private-sector wages and salaries, whereas COLAs for retirees
are based on increases the general level of prices in the national economy. The
objective of federal pay policy is to keep pay in the federal government competitive
with pay in the private sector. Increases in pay for federal civil service workers
therefore are indexed to increases in the wages and salaries of private-sector
employees. Over time, wage increases reflect increases in the nation’s output of
goods and services as well as price increases. Because wage increases in the private
sector reflect growth in the productivity of labor, wages tend to increase faster than
prices when measured over long periods of time.
1 The income-tested programs of Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and veterans’
pensions use the cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) formula of Social Security. Each year
since 1983 their benefits have been increased at the same time and by the same percentage
as Social Security benefits.

---

CRS-2
Social Security benefits and federal retirement annuities are indexed to increases
in the CPI, which measures changes in the price of a market basket of consumer
goods and services. Congress has linked COLAs for Social Security and federal
employee pensions to the rate of increase in the general level of prices in order to
protect retirement income from losing purchasing power through the effects of price
inflation. COLAs ensure that a retiree’s income will purchase the same amount of
goods and services after years of retirement that it purchased at the start of
retirement. COLAs do not reflect increases in the productivity of people who are still
in the work force, and thus they do not increase the real purchasing power of
retirement income. COLAs do not make retirees better off financially; they merely
protect them from becoming financially worse-off over time as prices rise.
How to Use the Benefit and Pay Increase Table
Table 1 shows the percentage increase in federal pay and retirement benefits for
each year since 1969, and an index relative to the base year. The index shows the
cumulative increase in pay or benefits, compounded annually, with a base of 100.0
in 1969. For example, Congress increased Social Security benefits by 15.0% in
1970, making benefits 115.0% of what they were in 1969. Another Social Security
benefit increase of 10.0% was granted in 1971, making benefits 126.5% of what they
had been in 1969. (1.15 X 1.10 = 1.265) Federal civilian retirees received a 5.6%
increase in their annuities in 1970, raising those benefits to 105.6% of the 1969 level.
The next increase in federal civilian retirement benefits was a 4.5% adjustment in
1971, bringing the average federal pension to 110.4% of its 1969 amount. (1.056 X
1.045 = 1.104)
The bottom row of the index column shows how much federal pay and
retirement benefits have grown since 1969. For example, with the COLA that was
paid in Social Security checks issued in January 2007, these benefits had increased
to 670% of their 1969 level, an increase of 570%.2 This means that a benefit initially
paid in 1969 would be 6.7 times as large in 2007 if it were still being paid this year.
Benefit increases can be compared across programs by looking at the index column
for any given year. For example, as of 1985, federal civilian pay had increased by
134% over what it had been in 1969, and Congressional pay had increased by 77%.
In comparison, average wages and salaries for all workers in the U.S. economy in
1985 were 185% greater than they had been in 1969. The column displaying the CPI
shows that by 1985 the price level had increased by 190% since 1969.
Procedures for Determining Increases
Social Security and Civil Service Retirement. Social Security and civil
service retirement benefits are adjusted to offset the effect of inflation in the cost of
living as measured by a price index.3 Cost-of-living adjustments enable retirees to
2 An index of 670 means that the number is 670% of the base, which is an increase of 570%,
just as 200 is 200% of 100 and represents an increase of 100% from a base of 100.
3 The two retirement systems for federal civil service workers use different adjustment
(continued...)

---

CRS-3
maintain the purchasing power of their retirement income. Automatic adjustments
to offset erosion in the value of retirement benefits caused by inflation were first
applied to civil service retirement by P.L. 87-783, enacted in 1962. In 1972, P.L. 92-
336, provided for automatic inflation-related increases in Social Security benefits.4
Benefit increases in Social Security preceding 1975 were not automatic COLAs
linked to inflation, but were special adjustments legislated by Congress. For
example, Congress granted the 1970, 1971, and 1972 Social Security increases of
15%, 10%, and 20%, respectively, in part because of concern about the number of
elderly Americans living in poverty. These increases were intended not just to offset
inflation in those years, but to raise the real level of benefits. The 8.0% Social
Security increase effective in June 1975 was the first automatic inflation-related
COLA.
The large increases in Social Security benefits that Congress provided
periodically before the program was indexed to inflation have had a substantial effect
on the cumulative index for Social Security shown in Table 1 because the table uses
1969 as the base year for the index. This may create a somewhat misleading
impression if Social Security benefit increases are compared with the civil service
retirement program, which was indexed to inflation in the early 1960s. For example,
if 1975 were used as the base year for the index instead of 1969, the cumulative
Social Security increase through January 2007 would be 268%. This is almost the
same as the 255% cumulative increase in civil service retirement benefits during that
period.5
The benefit adjustments in these programs are made by computing the average
monthly CPI for the third quarter of the current calendar year (July, August, and
September) and comparing it with the CPI for the third quarter of the previous year.
For example, the 3.3% Social Security COLA paid in January 2007 represents the
increase in the average monthly CPI for July, August, and September of 2006 over
the average monthly CPI for July, August, and September of 2005. The benefit
increases are first included in checks issued in the month of January and take place
automatically unless legislation is enacted to change them. In FY1986, the Gramm-
Rudman-Hollings Act canceled civil service retiree COLAs. In 1994, 1995, and
3 (...continued)
systems. The Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), which applies to workers first hired
into federal service before 1984, provides a full COLA for all retirees and survivors. The
Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS) covers workers hired on or after January
1, 1984 and others who voluntarily switched from CSRS to FERS. In order to constrain
retirement costs, Congress placed restrictions on COLAs to FERS retirees. FERS provides
COLAs to retirees under age 62 only if they are disabled or are survivor annuitants. FERS
retirees age 62 or over receive a full COLA only if the CPI increases by 2.0% or less. FERS
retirees receive a 2.0% COLA if the CPI increase is between 2.0 and 3.0%. If the CPI
increases by 3.0% or more, the FERS COLA is 1 percentage point less than the CPI.
4 This law was amended in 1973 by P.L. 93-66 and P.L. 93-233 before the 1972 law went
into effect.
5 From 1969 through 1976 the adjustment for civil service retirement was 1 percentage point
more than the rate of inflation.

---

CRS-4
1996, P.L. 103-66 (the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993) delayed civil
service nondisability retiree COLAs until April in order to achieve budget savings.
Federal Civil Service Pay. The Federal Employees’ Pay Comparability Act
of 1990 (P.L. 101-509) established a two-step system for setting and adjusting federal
pay. Step one is an annual increase that applies uniformly to all “white collar”
federal civil service employees covered by the general schedule (GS) pay system, the
foreign service pay system, and certain pay systems for employees of the Department
of Veterans Affairs. The second step comprises locality-based salary adjustments
that vary by geographic area.
Uniform Nationwide Pay Raises. The uniform nationwide annual
adjustment to the general schedule pay scales is based on the average pay raise
received by workers in the private sector from year to year. The Pay Comparability
Act specifies that the nationwide pay raises for federal white-collar GS workers are
to be one-half percentage point less than private sector wage increases, as measured
by the Employment Cost Index (ECI).6 The increase is computed by comparing the
ECI for the third quarter of the previous calendar year to the ECI in the third quarter
of the calendar year before that. Thus, there is a 15-month lag between the
measurement period and the effective date of the pay raise.
Although P.L. 101-509 specifies that the annual national increase in basic GS
pay rates will be equal to the percentage change in the ECI minus 0.5 percentage
point, the law gives the President authority to limit pay raises through executive
order in the event of serious economic conditions or a national emergency affecting
the general welfare.7
Based on the 3.0% increase in the ECI from the third quarter of 2004 to the third
quarter of 2005, the base pay increase for federal employees in January 2007 as
determined under the Pay Comparability Act would have been 2.5%. The President’s
budget for FY2007 proposed a 2.2% increase in federal civilian pay for calendar year
2007. Congress did not pass an appropriations bill for FY2007 for the Departments
of Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, the Judiciary, the
District of Columbia, and Independent Agencies before adjourning in December
2006. This bill usually includes increases in federal employee pay. On December
21, 2006, President Bush issued an executive order that provided a national average
pay increase of 2.2% for federal civilian employees to take effect on January 1, 2007.
Locality Pay. P.L. 101-509 authorized locality-based pay adjustments for
civilian federal employees in specified occupations and geographic locations to
reflect the salary levels of private-sector workers in similar occupations in those
areas. The original objective of the civil service locality pay program was to bring
federal salaries to within 5% of private sector salaries over a nine-year period (1994
6 The Bureau of Labor Statistics updates the ECI quarterly to measure changes in wages and
salaries in private-sector, non-farm employment.
7 Pay raises for members of the Senior Executive Service are not prescribed by law. They
are established by the President through an executive order. Thus, they may be the same as
or different from other civil service pay raises.

---

CRS-5
through 2002). Once pay parity is achieved, locality pay adjustments are no longer
to be made unless the gap subsequently widens to more than 5%. Although Congress
suspended the uniform nationwide civil service pay raise for 1994, it agreed to pay
locality raises to civil service workers. Since 1994, Congress has set aside P.L. 101-
509 and specified in appropriations bills the amounts available for distribution each
year as locality pay increases.
Federal Pay Raises for Within-grade Step Increases and
Promotions. The data in the column labeled “federal civil service pay” in Table
1 reflect post-1969 uniform nationwide pay raises and locality pay increases
applicable to the government’s overall pay scales for workers in GS positions, from
GS-1, step 1, through the highest grade of GS-15, step 10. As noted above, the
government increases the federal GS pay scale periodically (usually once a year) to
be competitive with wages and salaries paid by other employers. The pay increases
in Table 1 do not portray the total pay increases that any individual or group of
individuals might have received. As federal employees move through their careers,
they receive pay raises when they are granted a within-grade step increase or when
they receive a promotion to a higher pay grade. Both step increases and promotions
to higher grades are merit increases that are based on an individual’s performance in
his or her job. If a worker were to receive all within-grade step increases at the first
point of eligibility without being promoted to a higher pay grade, it would take 18
years to move from step 1 of a pay grade to step 10. The pay increases between steps
range from 2.5% to 3.3%. Thus, although Table 1 indicates that GS pay scales have
increased by 226% since 1975, the pay in 2006 of an individual who had been
continuously employed in a federal GS job between 1975 and 2006 would have risen
by more than 226% due to the combined effects of increases in the overall pay scales,
within-grade step increases, and promotions to higher grades. Some workers receive
step increases but few promotions; others receive steady, periodic promotions; and
still others receive rapid promotions and spend many years at high pay grades. Thus,
it is not possible to characterize in general terms how the actual pay of long-term
federal workers increases over time. Consequently, Table 1 should not be construed
as characterizing the salary history of a typical federal employee.
Pay for Members of Congress. The procedures for raising the pay of
civilian federal employees were applied to Members of Congress and other high-level
federal officials by P.L. 94-82, enacted on August 9, 1975. In the Government Ethics
Reform Act of 1989 (P.L. 101-194), Congress approved different pay increases for
the House and the Senate for 1990 and 1991. Subsequent legislation passed by
Congress once again made Senators’ pay equal to that of Representatives, effective
in August 1991. P.L. 101-194 also established a new procedure for setting Members’
pay. Pay increases for Members and top level federal officials are now based on two
pay-setting systems, one annual and one quadrennial. Beginning in 1991, Members’
annual pay raises were based on changes in the ECI reduced by 0.5 percentage point
and capped at 5.0%. In addition, approximately every four years a special
commission is to review Members’ pay in comparison with that of private sector
executives and recommend adjustments that they deem appropriate. On several
occasions, Congress has voted to cancel the pay raises it was authorized to receive

---

CRS-6
under P.L. 101-194. Congress refused the pay raises that it otherwise would have
received in 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1999.8
The annual pay increase for Members of Congress is computed by comparing
the ECI for the fourth quarter of the previous calendar year with the ECI in the fourth
quarter of the year before that. Thus, there is a 12-month lag between the measuring
period and implementation of the pay raise. Based on the 3.2% increase in the ECI
from December 2004 to December 2005, Members would have received a pay
increase of 2.7% on January 1, 2007. Congress has delayed the pay raise, and as of
January 2007, their pay remains at its 2006 level of $165,200.
Average Annual Wages and Salaries. The column labeled “average
annual wages/salaries” displays the average annual increases in wages and salaries
earned by all workers in the United States as reported by the Social Security
Administration Board of Trustees. Like the data on civil service pay, this column
does not reflect the pay raises an individual worker might receive from year to year
because as workers gain skills and experience they usually receive both pay raises
and promotions. The data in Table 1 reflect average wage growth for the entire
workforce, which is influenced by the retirement of older, higher-paid workers and
the entrance of younger, lower-paid workers. It also reflects shifts in the structure of
wages caused by declining employment in certain sectors of the economy and
increasing employment in other sectors. Because of the combined effects of pay
raises and promotions, the typical worker with a permanent attachment to the labor
force would have experienced wage growth greater than that shown in the “average
wage” column.
Price Increases. The final column of Table 1 shows the annual percentage
change in consumer prices as measured by the Consumer Price Index for Urban
Wage Earners (CPI-W). The CPI represents the average change nationwide in a
typical “market basket” of goods and services purchased by consumers. The CPI is
constructed from several component indexes. The goods and services that consumers
purchase are classified into 207 strata of items, and the urban areas in the United
States are divided into 44 areas, each with its own index. Thus, there are 9,108 (207
times 44) basic CPI components into which expenditures are classified. The items
included in the index change as new products or brands are introduced, and old
products are modified, improved, or dropped.
Using the price level of 1969 as the base for the index, the CPI had risen to
534.0 by 2006, meaning that consumer prices had risen by 434% over a 37-year
period. This represents an average annual increase in consumer prices of 4.1% over
the period from 1969 to 2007. Over the same period, wages and salaries rose at an
average annual rate of 5.2%, or 1.1% faster than prices. The 2006 index for Social
Security benefits was higher than the price index (649 compared to 534), but this
largely reflects the ad hoc increases granted by Congress in the early 1970s. Between
1975 and 2005, the Social Security index rose by 242% and the CPI-W rose by
8 For more information, see CRS Report RL30014, Salaries of Members of Congress:
Current Procedures and Recent Adjustments, by Paul Dwyer.

---

CRS-7
253%.9 Federal civilian retirement benefits grew at nearly the same rate as consumer
prices from 1969 to 2006, with the only differences accounted for by the lag-time
between price measurement and the implementation date of the COLAs for these
benefits. Increases in pay for civilian federal employees grew more slowly than
consumer prices over the period shown in Table 1, standing at an index value of 471
in 2006, compared to a CPI of 534.
9 Social Security and civil service retirement are indexed to the Consumer Price Index for
Urban Wage Earners (CPI-W).

---

CRS-8
Table 1. Increases in Social Security Benefits, Federal Civilian Pensions, Federal Pay,
Congressional Pay, National Average Wages, and Consumer Prices, 1969 to 2007
Civilian (CSRS)
Federal Civil
Congressional
Average Annual
Consumer
Year
Social Security
Retirementa
Service Pay
Payb
Wages/Salariesc
Prices (CPI-W)
Change
Index
Change
Index
Change
Index
Change
Index
Change
Index
Change
Index
1969
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
1970
15.0%
115.0
5.6%
105.6
6.0%
106.0
5.0%
105.0
5.7%
105.7
1971
10.0%
126.5
4.5%
110.4
6.0%
112.4
5.0%
110.2
4.4%
110.3
1972
20.0%
151.8
4.8%
115.6
10.9%
124.6
9.8%
121.0
3.4%
114.1
1973
6.1%
122.7
4.8%
130.6
6.3%
128.6
6.2%
121.1
1974
11.0%
168.5
12.2%
137.6
5.5%
137.7
5.9%
136.3
11.0%
134.4
1975
8.0%
182.0
12.8%
155.2
5.0%
144.6
4.9% 104.9
7.5% 146.4

9.1%
146.6
1976
6.4%
193.6
5.4%
163.6
4.8%
151.6
6.9%
156.5
5.7%
155.0
1977
5.9%
205.0
9.3%
178.8
7.0%
162.2
28.9%
135.2
6.0%
165.9
6.5%
165.0
1978
6.5%
218.4
7.4%
192.0
5.5%
171.1
7.9%
179.1
7.7%
177.8
1979
9.9%
240.0
11.1%
213.3
7.0%
183.1
5.5% 142.7
8.7% 194.8
11.4%
198.1
1980
14.3%
274.3
14.2%
243.5
9.1%
199.7
9.0%
212.3
13.4%
224.7
1981
11.2%
305.0
4.4%
254.2
4.8%
209.4
10.1%
233.7
10.3%
247.7
1982
7.4%
327.6
8.7%
276.3
4.0%
217.7
15.1%
164.2
5.5% 246.6

6.0%
262.6
1983
3.9%
287.1
4.9%
258.6
3.0%
270.5
1984
3.5%
339.1

4.0%
226.5
4.0%
170.8
5.9%
273.8
3.5%
279.9
1985
3.5%
350.9
3.5%
297.2
3.5%
234.4
3.4%
176.6
4.3%
285.4
3.5%
289.7
1986
3.1%
361.8


3.0%
293.9
1.6%
294.3
1987
1.3%
366.5
1.3%
301.0
3.0%
241.4
19.2%
210.5
6.4% 312.6

3.6%
304.9
1988
4.2%
381.9
4.2%
313.7
2.0%
246.2
4.9%
328.0
4.0%
317.1
1989
4.0%
397.2
4.0%
326.2
4.1%
256.3
4.0%
341.0
4.8%
332.2
1990
4.7%
415.9
4.7%
341.6
3.6%
265.6
7.9%
227.1
4.6%
356.8
5.2%
349.6
1991
5.4%
438.3
5.4%
360.0
4.1%
276.5
29.5%
294.1
3.7% 370.1

4.1%
364.0
1992
3.7%
454.5
3.7%
373.3
4.2%
288.1
3.5%
304.4
5.2%
389.1
2.9%
374.5
1993
3.0%
468.2
3.0%
384.5
3.7%
298.7
3.2%
314.1
0.9%
392.5
2.8%
385.1
1994
2.6%
480.3
2.6%
394.5
4.0%
310.6
2.7%
403.0
2.5%
394.6
1995
2.8%
493.8
2.8%
405.6
2.6%
318.7
4.0%
419.2
2.9%
406.0
1996
2.6%
506.6
2.6%
416.1
2.4%
326.3
4.9%
439.7
2.9%
417.6
1997
2.9%
521.3
2.9%
428.2
3.0%
336.1
5.8%
465.3
2.3%
427.1
1998
2.1%
532.2
2.1%
437.2
2.9%
345.9
2.3%
321.4
5.2%
489.7
1.3%
432.8
1999
1.3%
539.1
1.3%
442.9
3.6%
358.3
5.6%
517.0
2.2%
442.3
2000
2.4%
552.0
2.4%
453.5
4.8%
375.5
3.4%
332.3
5.5%
545.6
3.5%
457.7
2001
3.5%
571.4
3.5%
469.4
3.7%
389.4
2.7%
341.3
2.4%
558.6
2.7%
470.2
2002
2.6%
586.2
2.6%
481.6
4.6%
407.3
3.4%
352.9
1.0%
564.2
1.4%
476.7
2003
1.4%
594.4
1.4%
488.3
4.1%
424.0
3.1%
363.8
2.4% 577.7
2.2%
487.2
2004
2.1%
606.9
2.1%
498.6
4.1%
441.4
2.2%
371.8
4.6% 604.3
2.6%
499.9
2005
2.7%
623.3
2.7%
512.1
3.5%
456.8
2.5%
381.1
4.3% 630.3
3.5%
517.3
2006
4.1%
648.8
4.1%
533.1
3.1%
471.0
1.9%
388.4
4.0% 655.5
3.2%
533.9
2007
3.3%
670.2
3.3%
550.7
2.2%
481.4
4.3%
683.7
1.9%
544.0
Source: Congressional Research Service.
Notes: Changes are shown for the calendar year in which the increase appeared in the checks issued. For years in which payments were
increased more than once, the compounded effects are shown.

---

CRS-9
a. The COLAs in this column are those paid to CSRS annuitants. The COLAs paid under FERS (which are lower than CSRS COLAs in
any year that inflation exceeds 2.0%), are not shown. See CRS Report 94-834 for a table showing FERS COLAs each year since
1988.
b. The changes in each year are those for members of the House of Representatives. In 1969, Representatives and Senators were each paid
$42,500. In 2007, Representatives and Senators are each paid $165,200 per year. As of January 2007, there was no pay raise for
Senators in Representatives for calendar year 2007.
c. Computed by the Social Security Administration, based on wage data reported by employers to the Internal Revenue Service. Average
wages for 2006 and 2007 are estimates of the Office of the Actuary of the Social Security Administration. The CPI for 2007 is the
January 2007 CBO estimate

---